2) Which expressions are equal to 6^4?
A. 10
B. 216
C. 24
D. 6*6*6*6
E. 25
F. 62*62

Answer: Y=-1/4x

Step-by-step explanation:

A good way to find an equation of a line is to look for the slope. An obvious spot on this line would be when it crosses (0,0), and another one to the right would be when it crosses at (4,-1).

The slope is rise over run, or if we use the two points we found, "rise" would be -1, because it's dropping 1 unit when going from (0,0) to (4,-1), and the "run" would be 4, because it moves to the right 4 from (0,0) to (4,-1).

Putting these two values together we get:

m (slope) = rise / run

m = -1 / 4

Out of all the equations we're given, we can look for the one with a slope of -1/4, which is given to us:

y = (-1/4)x

Using a linear function, it is found that the product rs is rs = 81.

A linear function is modeled by:

y = mx + b

In which:

In this problem, when x changes by 68(from -64 to 68), y changes by -16(from 12 to -4), hence the slope is given by:

m = -16/64 = -0.25.

Hence:

y = -0.25x + b.

When x = 34, y = -4, hence this is used to find b.

-4 = -0.25(34) + b

b = 4.5.

Hence the function is:

y = -0.25x + 4.5.

f(r) = 0, hence:

-0.25x + 4.5 = 0

x = 4.5/0.25

x = 18

r = 18.

f (0) = s, hence s = 4.5.

Then the value of the product is:

rs = 18 x 4.5 = 81.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/24808124

#SPJ1

The loaded die appears to behave differently from a fair die.Based on the chi-square test, the loaded die does not exhibit equal probabilities for each outcome.

To test the claim that the outcomes of the loaded die are not equally likely, we can use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test. The null hypothesis (H₀) assumes that the outcomes are equally likely, while the alternative hypothesis (H₁) assumes that they are not equally likely.

Step 1: Set up hypotheses

H₀: The outcomes of the die are equally likely.

H₁: The outcomes of the die are not equally likely.

Step 2: Select the significance level

The significance level is given as 0.025, which means we have a two-tailed test and an alpha level of 0.025 for each tail.

Step 3: Compute the test statistic

We calculate the chi-square test statistic using the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies assuming equal probabilities for each outcome.

Expected frequencies (fair die):

1: 200/6 = 33.33

2: 200/6 = 33.33

3: 200/6 = 33.33

4: 200/6 = 33.33

5: 200/6 = 33.33

6: 200/6 = 33.33

Applying the chi-square formula, we get the test statistic:

χ² = ∑((observed - expected)² / expected)

Calculating this value, we get χ² ≈ 13.97.

Step 4: Determine the critical value

Since the significance level is 0.025 and the test is two-tailed, we divide the significance level by 2 to find the critical value associated with each tail. With 5 degrees of freedom (6 categories - 1), the critical value is approximately 11.07.

Step 5: Make a decision

The test statistic (13.97) is greater than the critical value (11.07), which leads us to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, we have evidence to suggest that the outcomes of the loaded die are not equally likely.

The loaded die appears to behave differently from a fair die.

In conclusion, based on the chi-square test, the loaded die does not exhibit equal probabilities for each outcome.

For more such questions die,click on

https://brainly.com/question/31368101

#SPJ8

Answer: The expression for the absolute value of x+2 when x is less than 2 is -(x+2).

Step-by-step explanation: When x is less than 2, x+2 is a negative number. The absolute value of a negative number is its opposite with the negative sign, so the absolute value of x+2 is -(x+2). Therefore, when x is less than 2, the expression for the absolute value of x+2 is -(x+2).

Answer:

f(x) = -3/2 x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The line rises to the left so the slope is negative, also:

the slope of the line is -3/2 and the y-intercept is at (0, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

(18/120).100

(0.15).100

15%

Answer:

15%

Step-by-step explanation:

A percent can be found by dividing the part by the whole, then multiplying by 100.

(part/whole) * 100

In this case, the part is the puppies and the whole is the total number of dogs.

(puppies/all dogs) * 100

There are 18 puppies and 120 dogs in all.

(18 puppies / 120 total dogs) * 100

(18/120) * 100

First, solve inside the parentheses. Divide 18 by 120.

(0.15)* 100

Next, multiply 0.15 and 100

15

15%

15% of all the dogs in the kennel were puppies.

Answer:

a)after 1,000 years?

1 meter

b) 10 million years?

10,000 meters

c) 50 million years?

50,000 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told in the question that mountains rise 1 mm per year.

a) After 1000 years

1 year = 1 mm

1000 years =

Cross Multiply

1000 × 1 mm

= 1000mm

Converting to meters

1 mm = 0.001 m

1000 mm =

1000 × 0.001m

= 1 meter

b) After 10 million (10,000,000) years

1 year = 1 mm

10000000years =

Cross Multiply

10000000 × 1 mm

= 10,000,000mm

Converting to meters

1 mm = 0.001 m

10,000,000mm =

10,000,000 × 0.001m

= 10,000 meters

c) After 50 million years(50,000,000)

After 50,000,000 years

1 year = 1 mm

50,000,000years =

Cross Multiply

50,000,000 × 1 mm

= 50,000,000mm

Converting to meters

1 mm = 0.001 m

50,000,000mm =

50,000,000 × 0.001m

= 50,000 meters

Answer: So it will take 90 hours (which is 3.75 days or 3 days, 18 hours) to eat all the possible cheeseburgers.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 9 x 6 x 2 x 5 = 540 different cheeseburgers

So...

(540 cheeseburgers)*(10 minutes/1 cheeseburger) = 540 x 10 = 5400 minutes

Convert to hours to get

(5400 min)*(1 hr/60 min) = 5400/60 = 90 hours

Answer:

x=44, They are adjacent

Step-by-step explanation:

since this is right angle it is 90 degrees. You set the whole thing equal to 90, so 43+x+3=90, add 43 and 3=46. Then you subtract 90-46, you get x=44.  

Answer:

The 96% CI on the death rate from lung cancer is (0.4177, 0.4823).

Step-by-step explanation:

In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of \(\pi\), and a confidence level of \(1-\alpha\), we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

\(\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}\)

In which

z is the z-score that has a p-value of \(1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}\).

Of 1000 randomly selected cases of lung cancer, 450 resulted in death within 5 years.

This means that \(n = 1000, \pi = \frac{450}{1000} = 0.45\)

96% confidence level

So \(\alpha = 0.04\), z is the value of Z that has a p-value of \(1 - \frac{0.04}{2} = 0.98\), so \(Z = 2.054\).  

The lower limit of this interval is:

\(\pi - z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.45 - 2.054\sqrt{\frac{0.45*0.55}{1000}} = 0.4177\)

The upper limit of this interval is:

\(\pi + z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.45 + 2.054\sqrt{\frac{0.45*0.55}{1000}} = 0.4823\)

The 96% CI on the death rate from lung cancer is (0.4177, 0.4823).

The value of x is 20.

Given that a rectangle PQRS has diagonals PR = 4x - 15, and QS = 3x + 5, we need to find the value of x,
Since, we know that the diagonals of a rectangle are equal,

So,

PR = QS

4x-15 = 3x+5

x = 20

Hence the value of x is 20.

Learn more about rectangles, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29123947

#SPJ1

Answer:

none. he was made into a smoothie, so he is a liquid.(⌐■_■)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Since the values are not given i can only tell how to solve if the values were given,

you know that it got blended into one peice, which is 1

You take this number and multiply it by the number of peices their were which is x

so the answer of this will be x

where x is a variable that represents number of peices.

M is not on the list, and thus the list cannot be a complete listing of all real numbers between 0 and 1.

Inductive reasoning is defined as, tempting judgments by moving from the details to the fact. It's usually determined with inferential reasoning, where you move from known information to precise conclusions.

Here,
Georg Cantor's diagonal argument is proof by contradiction that shows that there are more real numbers than natural numbers. Here's how the proof can be reworked with the given modification:

Suppose that we have a list of all real numbers between 0 and 1, written in decimal form. We will show that this list cannot be a complete listing of all real numbers between 0 and 1.

Let M be a new real number whose decimal expansion is obtained by following the following rule: if the nth digit of the nth number on the list is 4, then the nth digit of M is 8; if the nth digit of the nth number on the list is not 4, then the nth digit of M is 4.

Since each number on the list has a unique decimal expansion, M is a real number between 0 and 1, and its decimal expansion is different from the nth number on the list in the nth digit for all n.

Therefore, M is not on the list, and thus the list cannot be a complete listing of all real numbers between 0 and 1.

Learn more about inductive reasoning here, https://brainly.com/question/8419798
#SPJ1

Answer:

D: 14.5

Step-by-step explanation:

4.1 = d - 10.4    add 10.4 to each side

14.5 = d

Answer:

14.5

Step-by-step explanation:

10.4 - 4.1 = 14.5

The sampling method used in this problem is classified as:

Simple Random Sampling

Samples may be classified as:

In this problem, all the options are assigned a number and then taken, hence a Simple Random Sample is used.

More can be learned about sampling methods at https://brainly.com/question/24466382

#SPJ1

The firm's federal income tax is $57,168.

To calculate the firm's federal income tax, we need to determine its taxable income first. Taxable income is calculated by subtracting deductions from the firm's total income.

In this case, the firm's total income consists of income from operations, interest income, and dividend income.

Total income:

Income from operations = $231,000

Interest income = $23,100

Dividend income = $29,700

Total income = $231,000 + $23,100 + $29,700 = $283,800

Next, we deduct expenses from the total income. In this case, the only relevant expense is the interest paid to bondholders:

Total expenses = Interest paid to bondholders = $11,000

Taxable income = Total income - Total expenses = $283,800 - $11,000 = $272,800

Now, we can calculate the federal income tax by applying the federal tax rate of 21% to the taxable income:

Federal income tax = Taxable income * Federal tax rate

Federal income tax = $272,800 * 0.21 = $57,168

Therefore, the firm's federal income tax is $57,168.

For more such questions on tax,click on

https://brainly.com/question/28414951

#SPJ8

Complete Question

According to a study done by the Gallup organization, the proportion of Americans who are satisfied with the way things are going in their lives is 0.82. Suppose a random sample of 100 Americans is asked "Are you satisfied with the way things are going in your life?"

What is the probability the sample proportion who are satisfied with the way things are going in their life is greater than 0.85

Answer:

The probability is  \(P(X > 0.85 ) = 0.21745\)

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The population proportion is \(p = 0.82\)

   The value considered is  x  =  0.85

     The  sample size is  n = 100

The standard deviation for this population proportion is evaluated as

        \(\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} }\)

substituting values

       \(\sigma = \sqrt{\frac{0.82(1-0.82)}{100} }\)

      \(\sigma = 0.03842\)

Generally the probability that probability the sample proportion who are satisfied with the way things are going in their life is greater than x is mathematically represented as

       \(P(X > x ) = P( \frac{X - p }{ \sigma } > \frac{x - p }{ \sigma } )\)

Where  \(\frac{X - p }{ \sigma }\) is  equal to Z (the  standardized value of X ) so  

         \(P(X > x ) = P( Z> \frac{x - p }{ \sigma } )\)

substituting values

        \(P(X > 0.85 ) = P( Z> \frac{ 0.85 - 0.82 }{ 0.03842 } )\)

        \(P(X > 0.85 ) = P( Z> 0.78084)\)

from the standardized normal distribution table \(P( Z> 0.78084)\) is  0.21745

So  

      \(P(X > 0.85 ) = 0.21745\)

Answer: 3ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The building is the opposite, the distance between the foot of the ladder and the building is the adjacent, while the ladder is the hypotenuse. The answer is 3 ft.

hope this helped, have a good day! :)

Answer:  1 foot

Step-by-step explanation:

I think it's 1 foot because the tops are touching you have to spread the bottoms apart so it can touch.

Answer:

y = -⅓ X + 5/9

slope = - ⅓

...

Answer:

slope intercept form is: (That is in the first pic)

y= - 1/3x + 5/9

slope = - 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

See image below:) Hope this helps

[~S & (R V S)] ≡ (Q ⊃ S) is true when A = T, S = F, R = F, and Q = T by substituting the propositional variables.

A truth table is a table used to determine the truth values of a compound proposition, which is a logical statement made up of simpler propositions using logical operators such as "and" (represented by "&"), "or" (represented by "V"), "not" (represented by "~"), conditional (represented by "⊃"), and biconditional (represented by "≡").

Let's substitute the given truth values for the propositional variables in the given statement:

[~F & (F V F)] ≡ (T ⊃ F)

Using the truth table for conjunction (represented by "&") and disjunction (represented by "V"), we can simplify the left-hand side of the equivalence:

[T & F] ≡ (T ⊃ F)

Using the truth table for conditional (represented by "⊃"), we can simplify the right-hand side of the equivalence:

F ≡ F

Since both sides of the equivalence have the same truth value, the statement is true.

Therefore, [~S & (R V S)] ≡ (Q ⊃ S) is true when A = T, S = F, R = F, and Q = T.

Learn more about truth table visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29155453

#SPJ1

<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3

Answer:

x - intercept(s) : ( -9, 0 )

y - intercept(s) : ( 0, 54 )

<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3<3

Answer:

Part A: $3,415.50

B: 11.34%

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A: $31,000 is within the values 10,276≤x≤41,175, so use f(x)=0.12x-205.50

Part B: For the effective tax rate, divide the amount in part A by the taxable income

Part C: Compare both the taxable income and the effective tax rate to the income domains given and the % multiplier. This one is mostly about how you describe the situation, so I'll leave that up to you.

To calculate the taxes owed on a taxable income of $31,000, we use the appropriate equation for the tax bracket it falls into and substitute the value of x. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the amount of taxes owed by the taxable income and multiplying by 100. The piecewise function represents the marginal tax rate chart by using different equations for each tax bracket.

Part A:

To calculate the amount of taxes owed on a taxable income of $31,000, we need to determine which tax bracket it falls into. Since $31,000 is greater than $10,275 but less than $41,175, it falls into tax bracket 2. To find the amount of taxes owed, we use the equation for tax bracket 2: f(x) = 0.12x - 205.50. Plugging in $31,000 for x, we get:

f(x) = 0.12 * 31000 - 205.50 = $3,574.50

Therefore, the amount of taxes owed on a taxable income of $31,000 is $3,574.50.

Part B:

To determine the effective tax rate, we divide the amount of taxes owed by the taxable income. Using the result from Part A (taxes owed = $3,574.50) and the taxable income of $31,000, we have:

Effective tax rate = (taxes owed / taxable income) * 100 = (3,574.50 / 31,000) * 100 ≈ 11.52%

Therefore, the effective tax rate on a taxable income of $31,000 is approximately 11.52%.

Part C:

The piecewise function represents the amount of taxes owed as a function of the taxable income. Each part of the function corresponds to a different tax bracket, with the equation for that tax bracket. The marginal tax rate chart is represented in the piecewise function by the different equations for each tax bracket. For example, the equation in part 1 of the function (f(x) = 0.10x) corresponds to the 10% marginal tax rate for the tax bracket $0-$10,275.

Learn more about Taxes Calculations here:

https://brainly.com/question/16200743

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

45

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5

The perimeter of the rectangular bedroom is 126 feet.

To find the perimeter of the rectangular bedroom, we need to add up the lengths of all four sides.

The distance between the points (14, 22) and (14, -10) is 22 - (-10) = 32 feet, since these two points lie on a vertical line.

The distance between the points (14, -10) and (-17, -10) is 14 - (-17) = 31 feet, since these two points lie on a horizontal line.

The distance between the points (-17, -10) and (-17, 22) is 22 - (-10) = 32 feet, since these two points lie on a vertical line.

The distance between the points (-17, 22) and (14, 22) is 14 - (-17) = 31 feet, since these two points lie on a horizontal line.

Therefore, the perimeter of the rectangular bedroom is;

P = 32 + 31 + 32 + 31

P = 126 feet.

Learn more about perimeter of rectangle here: https://brainly.com/question/24571594

#SPJ1

Answer:

6+(10−4) ^2-20  

Subtract 4 from 10 to get 6.

6+6 ^2-20  

Calculate 6 to the power of 2 and get 36.

6+36−20

Add 6 and 36 to get 42.

42−20

Subtract 20 from 42 to get 22.

Step-by-step explanation:

So basically, the answer is 22. let me know if i am wrong or right i haven't done these in the longest hope you have a good day :)

using SOH CAH TOA

Tan 85.144 =h/130

h=tan 85.144*130

h=1530.19 fr

The horse would be 59.05 inches tall.

What is unit conversion?

A unit conversion expresses the same properties as another unit of measurement. For example, time can be expressed in minutes instead of hours, and distance can be converted from miles to kilometers, feet, or other units of length.

As we know, 1 meter = 39.37 inches

The height of the horse is given as 1.5 meters.

so the height of the horse in inches will be = 1.5 × 39.37

                                                                        = 59.05 inches.

Hence, the horse would be 59.05 inches tall.

To learn more about the unit conversions, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/141163

#SPJ13

The integers in the set S:{-79, 80, 39, 40) that will make the inequality 1/0.4(m - 0.4) ≤ 1/21(m - 39) false are: S:{39, 40}​.

Determine the integers

In order to determine which integers are true and false with respect to a solution of the given inequality, we would have to test the given integers by substituting their values into the inequality as follows;

For integers (-80, 79), we have:

1/0.4(m - 0.4) ≤ 1/21(m - 39)

1/0.4(-80 - 39) ≤ 1/21(-40 - 39)

1/3(-39) ≤ 1/6(-40)

-39.6 ≤p< -40 (True).

For integers (-80, 79), we have:

1/0.4(m - 80) ≤ 1/21(m - 39)

1/3(24 - 3) ≤ 1/21(24 - 12)

1/3(27) ≤ 1/6(36)

79.6 ≤ p < 80 (False).

For integers (-40, -39), we have:

1/3(27) ≤ 1/6(36)

1/3(24 - 3) ≤ 1/21(24 - 12)

1/0.4(-80 - 39) ≤ 1/21(-40 - 39)

-39.6 ≤ -40 (True).

For integers (-80, 79), we have:

1/3(m - 3) ≤ 1/6(m - 12)

1/3(12 - 3) ≤ 1/6(12 - 12)

1/3(9) ≤ 1/6(0)

3 ≤ 0 (False).

For integers (12, 24), we have:

1/3(m - 3) ≤ 1/6(m - 12)

1/3(12 - 3) ≤ 1/6(12 - 12)

1/3(9) ≤ 1/6(0)

3 ≤ 0 (False).

1/3(m - 3) ≤ 1/6(m - 12)

1/3(24 - 3) ≤ 1/6(24 - 12)

1/0.4(-80 - 39) ≤ 1/21(-40 - 39))

79.6 ≤ p < 80  (False)

1/0.4(m - 0.4) ≤ 1/21(m - 39) false are: S:{39, 40}​.

To learn more about Integers visit:

brainly.com/question/15276410

#SPJ4

Answer:

5 foot rise over 2 foot run

Step-by-step explanation:

when u turn the fractions in to decimals that helps... 3/2 = 1 1/2= 1.5    5/3 = 1 2/3 = 1.6666

Answer:

y = 1/2

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Equality Properties

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

3(2y - 3) - 6 = -12

Step 2: Solve for y

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

here you go mate

step 1

3(2y-3)-6=-12  equation

step 2

3(2y-3)-6=-12  simplify

(3)(2y)+(3)(-3)+-6=-12

step 3

(3)(2y)+(3)(-3)+-6=-12  distribute

6y+(-9)+(-6)=-12

step 4

(6y)+(-9+-6)=-12  combine the terms

6y-15=-12

step 5

6y-15(+15)=-12(+15) add +15 to both sides

6y=3

step 6

6y/6=3/6

answer

y=1/2