Answer:E E
1 2 4 233E E ED3546QW2423U97432
Explanation:
Insurance companies never require the patient to submit the claim form
Insurance companies never require the patient to submit the claim form is untrue.
What is Insurance?
The word “insurance” refers to the management of risk. The way insurance companies operate is that the amount of compensation paid is inversely correlated to the loss caused by the unfavorable event.
The record will be kept by the insurance company. Filling out the paperwork for a Medicare claim is necessary. Understanding the necessary supporting documents is crucial in order to receive payment.
The Affordable Care Act shortened the time required to submit claims from 15 to 27 months to 12 months, which Medicare providers should be aware of.
Hence, the significance of the insurance is aforementioned.
Learn more about on insurance, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ1
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
6. What is the goal of social policy? Name some programs and state how they help communities.
The goal of social policy is in order to identify and find ways of reducing inequalities in access to services and as well as support between social groups.
The main goal of social policies is in order to ensure that everyone in the society lives in peace and harmony and also away from the conflicts. With the social policies, it is aimed to ensure that social development, social integration, social justice, social balance, and social peace to the social groups.
Social policy aims to improve human welfare and also to meet human needs for health, education, housing and also economic security. For instance, in the United States, a few programs are: Medicare- Health insurance for individuals over 65 and those with certain illnesses or disabilities.
Hence, important areas of social policy are welfare, social security, poverty reduction, justice, etc.
To learn more about social policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/25451003
#SPJ1
Do you think the federal government should be able to force Texas and other
states to follow federal policies that they normally wouldn't have to in exchange for receiving money
from the federal government?
I do not think that the federal government should force Texas and other states to follow federal policies in exchange for federal aid because the constititution discourages this.
What is federal aid?Federal aid includes federal grants, loans, or other federal assistance for certain federal programs or policies.
The constitution does not empower the federal government to hamstring states to follow its policies. However, with federal aid, the federal government can influence states, including Texas.
Thus, I do not think that the federal government should force Texas and other states to follow federal policies in exchange for federal aid.
Learn more about federal aid and constitutional conflicts at https://brainly.com/question/5496965
#SPJ1
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
What do you think is the political culture of the United States? What role do your personal values, ideology, and socialization play in your view? Have you considered your personal biases, preferences, prejudices, and beliefs in your opinion of your own culture compared to that of the country. Since we are such a diverse country, how much influence should one persons cultural beliefs/values, influence that of the country?
The political culture in the United States is one where there are core values.
These values include:
Equality UnityDemocracyDiversityMy personal values has to do with my belief that everyone is equal and no race is better than the other.
It has to do with accepting the diverse culture of the people of the country and respecting people irrespective of the differences that we have.
My personal beliefs can not be the same for every other person in the country. People have their own views on issues based on their own culture.
Given the diversity of the United States, one person's culture should not be used to influence the entire nation.
This may lead to issues in the country. Other cultures would be forced to accept a culture they do not identify with. This may lead to race issues and discrimination.
The diversity of the USThe US is a very diverse country because it is made up of people that are from different races all over the world. We have the blacks, the whites and the mixed races in the country.
Read more on political culture here:
https://brainly.com/question/1576032
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately __________ percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016.
Answer:
28 percent
Explanation:
Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.
Once points are on your driving record, they will stay there for at least.
Answer:
12 months
Explanation:
I think
Answer:
five years
Explanation:
your welcome
Retirement plans (IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs) with named beneficiary designations pass outside of the probate process. Transfers that include a revocable beneficiary designation or a transfer to a revocable trust are incomplete transfers, which are not gifts for gift tax purposes. True or False?
Retirement plans with named beneficiary designations, such as IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs, do pass outside of the probate process.
The statement is true.
For gift tax purposes, transfers with a revocable beneficiary designation or to a revocable trust are considered incomplete transfers. Retirement plans such as IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs allow individuals to save for retirement and offer the benefit of named beneficiary designations. Upon the account holder's death, the assets held in the account are directly transferred to the named beneficiaries without going through the probate process. This can be advantageous, as it saves time and money, and provides quicker access to the assets. However, it's important to periodically review and update beneficiary designations to ensure that they reflect the account holder's wishes and any changes in personal circumstances or family situations.
Know more about retirement plans:
https://brainly.com/question/29393946
#SPJ11
What is the maximum penalty for selling beverages to an intoxicated person alcoholic beverages
The Liquor manages Act prohibits an alcoholic liquor permittee or their employees from supplying alcohol to intoxicated individuals (CGS § 30-86(b)(1)). Violations are punishable by using as much as $1,000 up to at least one-12 months imprisonment, or, for every offense (CGS § 30-113).
Some commonplace signs and symptoms of intoxication are Loud speech, boasting, crude conduct, consuming on my own, ingesting too fast, slurred speech, ordering doubles, looking for rounds, and stumbling.
Single indicator as a way to particularly become aware of seen intoxication.
1)frequency of drinking.
2)Speech.
3)Incoherent, rambling, and slurring.
4)conduct.
5)impolite, offensive, overly pleasant, annoying, confused, aggressive, violent, and inappropriate.
6)stability.
7)Unsteady on toes, dazzling and swaying.
8)Coordination.
Learn more about the intoxicated person here: https://brainly.com/question/28019347
#SPJ1
If the contract between Barry Builder and Caren's Construction contained more conditions, and if Lisa Leaser was one of 40 potential tenants affected, would your answer to the previous question change?
Answer:
is there supposed to be a screenshot
Explanation:
The original jurisdiction will be Maryland if the contract between Barry Builder and Caren's Construction had additional clauses and if Lisa Leaser was one of the 40 possible tenants impacted.
What is original Jurisdiction?The Constitution's Article III, Section II establishes the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and its authority to hear cases. Certain instances, such as lawsuits involving two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original jurisdiction (a matter is in trial before the Court).
The given case law extract is a question that demand the land of original jurisdiction implication under the said circumstances.
Due to the building's location in Baltimore, Maryland's courts will have exclusive authority over any legal disputes. Although the parties involved can be New York and New Jersey residents, the structure is not.
Therefore, Maryland will be the original jurisdiction in this case because the contract involves building renovations.
To know more about original Jurisdiction refer:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ5
Disclosing workplace issues in a public setting is _
who watch how to basic here
any conspiracy that has a substantial effect on u.s. commerce is within the scope of the sherman act, unless it occurs outside the united states. true false
It is true that any conspiracy that has a substantial effect on u.s. commerce is within the scope of the sherman act, unless it occurs outside the united states.
The Sherman Act generally forbids 1) anticompetitive contracts and 2) unilateral actions that dominate or attempt to monopolise the relevant market. The Act permits the Department of Justice to file lawsuits to prevent activity that violates the law, and it also permits private individuals who were harmed by such conduct to file lawsuits for monetary damages i.e. three times as much money in damages as the violation cost them. A corpus of case law based on the Sherman Act has been established over time by the federal courts, making some forms of anticompetitive behaviour illegal per se and requiring case-by-case consideration of whether the behaviour unfairly restricts commerce.
To know more about sherman act:
brainly.com/question/14435015
#SPJ4
describe the effects of the 13th 14th and 15th amendments, including the purpose and unintended consequences or challenges with enforcement of those amendments
Answer: The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, were designed to ensure equality for recently emancipated slaves.
removing existing barriers when readily achievable in public buildings, such as adding braille markings to elevator buttons, is a requirement of which law?
A limited use/limited application elevator, or LULA, is smaller and moves more slowly than a typical passenger elevator found in a large commercial structure.
According to Meihls, LULAs are made for limited capacity and normally only carry passengers up one or two storeys. Churches, schools, libraries, and small businesses frequently have them.In order to increase accessibility in already-existing structures, LULAs can also be installed. In order to be in compliance with the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (the most recent revision), your building must be altered, renovated, or expanded to remove "accessibility barriers in existing places of public accommodation when doing so is readily achievable."
learn more about LULA here:
https://brainly.com/question/17144835
#SPJ4
Why is the forensic interview especially important in child abuse cases? What are key tips to ensure facts gathered in the interview can withstand judicial scrutiny and why are all forensic interviews with children recorded?
Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.
To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.
What is the importance of Forensic interviews?The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.
Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.
Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.
Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1
You are a parole officer who has a single mother with three hyperactive, attention deficit-disorder young children on your caseload. She receives no support from her ex-husband. Her mother wants nothing to do with her or the children because she believes “God is punishing” the young mother. She works as a topless dancer but hates it. She continues dancing because it pays the bills so well. You know she regularly smokes marijuana in an attempt to deal with stress. Obviously, this is a violation of probation. However, if you file a violation report on her, she will go back to prison. You know she is doing the best she can with her kids, is very involved with their school, and they are strongly bonded to her. You worry about what will happen to the kids.
1.What would you do?
Things to consider as you prepare
Ethical judgment: Defer filing a violation report while you work with her to find a better means to support herself and kids. Moral Rules: One should treat each person as an end and not as a means.
One should act in such a way that you will it to be a universal law.
One should do what is best for everyone.
One should do one’s duty.
Ethical system: A strict duty-based system might support filing a violation report, however, it depends on the definition of duty. It could be argued that a probation officer’s duty is not to automatically file violation reports, but rather to “protect society.” In this expanded view of duty, resolving the situation without filing a violation report might be
1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.
2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.
What is an ethical duty?An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.
However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly. Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.
Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.
Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975
#SPJ1
Who did Jeremy Bentham think deserved special consideration?
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Who was Jeremy Bentham What did he believe in?Even though he was a strong supporter of expanding individual legal rights, he opposed natural law and natural rights, which are both thought to have a "divine" or "God-given" origin, and referred to them as "nonsense upon stilts." Legal fiction was harshly criticized by Bentham as well.
The founder of modern utilitarianism, which holds that actions are morally right if they tend to promote happiness or pleasure (and morally wrong if they tend to promote unhappiness or pain) among all those affected by them, was a philosopher, economist, jurist, and legal reformer Jeremy Bentham.
Bentham recognized that, regardless of the overall cost to the community, rulers sought to advance their own happiness rather than the greatest happiness of those who were under their control.
To learn more about Jeremy Bentham refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1085669
#SPJ4
Who is the complainant in a sexual assault case ?
Answer:
the one whom was assaulted ?
Explanation:
Describe three times when lethal injections have gone wrong. Describe one time when another method of execution went wrong.
Answer:
On April 29, 2014, Clayton Derrell Lockett suffered from a heart attack during his execution by lethal injection in the U.S. state of Oklahoma.
On January 18, 2018, Anthony Shore struggled to breathe by pentobarbital in Texas.
On October 28, 2021, John Marion Grant began convulsing and vomiting after the first drug. Mr. Grant has given a sedative drug a couple of minutes after. Then was declared dead soon after. Someone vomiting while being executed is very rare.
On May 3, 1946, in Louisiana Willie Francis was attempted to be executed by the electric chair. But an intoxicated officer had not properly set up the chair. Mr. Francis was badly shocked but survived.
Explanation:
The first three were from AP news. Last was from deathpenaltyinfo.org.
When you can’t determine who arrived at an intersection first yield to the vehicle ____
When you can’t determine who arrived at an intersection first yield to the vehicle on the right.
When should you yield to the vehicle on your right ?In situations where it is unclear which vehicle arrived at an intersection first, it is recommended to yield to the vehicle on the right. This is commonly known as the "right-of-way" rule, which means that the vehicle on the right has the right to proceed first.
However, if there are traffic signals or signs present at the intersection, you should follow them accordingly. It is always important to be cautious and aware of your surroundings while driving, especially at intersections where accidents are more likely to occur.
Find out more on vehicles at https://brainly.com/question/29479618
#SPJ1
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
5. Which of the following multiyear contracts would require congressional notification before award? a. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $12 million b. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $13.5 million c. Multiyear contract with a cancellation ceiling of $20 million d. None of the above
Based on the regulations of the United States Department of Defense (DoD), multiyear contracts that have a cancellation ceiling equal to or greater than $13.5 million require congressional notification before award. (Option b.
What is Congressional Notification?In the context of U.S. federal government contracting, Congressional notification refers to the process of informing Congress about certain types of proposed contracts or other transactions before they can be awarded or executed.
This notification is typically required by law or regulation and is intended to give Congress the opportunity to review and potentially object to the proposed contract or transaction. Congressional notification is often required for contracts that exceed certain dollar thresholds or that involve certain types of goods or services.
Learn more about congressional notification here: https://brainly.com/question/22217798
#SPJ1
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
Buying insurance and investing for the future requires spending less in the present. Why is this a hard choice for many people? Would it be a hard choice for you?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a very hard choice for many people because they have been raised in a consumer culture. For these individuals, happiness is buying the latest technology, clothing, or other accessories that is trending. They also want to live life to the fullest that they can afford. It all depends on your mentality towards what is happiness to you. For me personally, It was like this when I was younger but not anymore. When I turned 23 and found out what was possible through compound interest investing and other forms of investments, it became a no brainer to invest all I could at a younger age to have the peace of mind that comes with financial freedom later in life.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the
distribution of Gensol. The FDA is a federal executive
agency. Because it has rulemaking authority and may
impose fines against businesses in violation, it is known
as a:
non-regulatory agency.
regulatory agency.
rulemaking agency.
creation agency.
Answer:
it is known as a regulatory agency
Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?
Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white collar crime.
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
third parties are least likely to achieve electoral success in which types of elections?
Third parties are least likely to achieve electoral success in presidential elections and other high-stakes, national elections. This is because these elections typically have higher barriers to entry, such as stricter ballot access requirements and greater media scrutiny. Additionally, many voters may view third-party candidates as less viable options in national races and may be more likely to stick with major-party candidates who they perceive as having a better chance of winning. Third parties may have more success in local and state-level races, where there may be fewer barriers to entry and a greater willingness among voters to consider alternative candidates.
To know more about third parties click here:
brainly.com/question/31928031
#SPJ11