A federal law significantly curtailing disenfranchisement of racial and ethnic minorities by banning literacy tests and requiring federal supervision of jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination is the -Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th President of the United States. The statute was passed in response to the discrimination African-Americans experienced when exercising their right to vote.
President Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law on May 26, 1965, following the occurrence of the Selma to Montgomery March on March 7, 1965. This statute grants African-Americans the right to vote whether or not they are literate. Racism against racial minorities was eradicated by Johnson's Voting Rights Act.
so, the correct answer is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
For more info about 'Voting Rights Act of 1965' click on below link - https://brainly.com/question/13837059
#SPJ4
3. case study 2: withholding information a physician has a patient with terminal cancer. the patient's family has requested that the physician not tell the patient about the diagnosis. the patient is an adult, but the family fears that the diagnosis will make the patient horribly depressed and that he would live out his last days in a happier state if he did not know the end was near. what should the physician do? what moral or ethical dilemma does the physician face? what would you do if you were the physician? what should the physician do?
In this case study, the physician faces a moral and ethical dilemma regarding withholding information about the patient's terminal cancer diagnosis. The physician should prioritize the patient's autonomy. As a physician I would have discuss their diagnosis in supportive manner.
The physician in this case is facing a moral and ethical dilemma. On one hand, the physician has a duty to respect the patient's autonomy and to provide them with all the necessary information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Patient autonomy refers to the right of patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. On the other hand, the physician is being asked by the patient's family to withhold crucial information about the patient's diagnosis.
In this case, the physician should prioritize the patient's autonomy and inform them about their diagnosis. It is important for the patient to have the opportunity to make decisions about their healthcare and to have the chance to plan for the end of their life. Withholding this information could be seen as a violation of the patient's rights and could ultimately harm the patient's well-being.
If I were the physician in this case, I would approach the patient and discuss their diagnosis in a compassionate and supportive manner. I would provide the patient with all the necessary information about their condition and discuss their options for treatment and end-of-life care. I would also offer support to the patient and their family as they navigate this difficult time.
In conclusion, while it may be tempting for the physician to comply with the family's wishes to withhold information, it is ultimately in the patient's best interest to be fully informed about their diagnosis. The physician must prioritize the patient's autonomy and provide them with the support they need to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
Learn more about Ethical dilemma:
https://brainly.com/question/14864299
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Advertising plays a major role in how
A. opinion polls
B. Media
Presents or characterizes a political A. Reporter
B. Candidate
During election periods. Each ad has a specific
A. Standard
B. Message
Created to
A. Persuade
B. Dissuade
A viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.
Answer:
Advertising plays a major role in how
**NOT OPINION POLLS BUT BRAINLY WONT LET ME SAY IT**
presents or characterizes a political
**candidate**
during election periods. Each ad has a specific
**message**
created to
**persuade**
a viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.
Explanation:
I'm 86% sure that correct but its more helpful than the other awenser for now atleast :P
Advertising plays a major role in how
-(B) Media
Presents or characterizes a political
-(B) Candidate
During election periods. Each ad has a specific
-(B) Message
Created to
-(A) Persuade
A viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.
What's the role of media?Media is a sword arm of democracy. In general it means various means of communication.
Media is intended to reach and address a large target group or audience. Media can be categorised into print and digital media.
Media acts as a watchdog to protect public interest against malpractice and create public awareness.
It acts as the fourth pillar of democracy and has an embracing role to act against injustice, oppression, misdeed of our society.
What is persuasion?Persuasion is an art of influencing the individual. Persuasion can attempt to influence a person's beliefs, attitude, intention, motivation and behavior.
Psychology looks persuasion through the lens of individual behavior and neuroscience studies the brain activity associated with this behavior.
Persuasion is also often used tool in the pursuit of personal gain such as election campaigning.
It can also be interpreted as using one's personal or positional resources to change people.
To learn more about Media and Persuasion here
https://brainly.com/question/14047162
#SPJ3
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
when did Stalin died?
Answer:
Explanation:
Joseph Stalin, second leader of the Soviet Union, died on 5 March 1953 at the Kunsevo Dacha, aged 74, after suffering a stroke. He was given a state funeral, with four days of national mourning declared. His body was subsequently embalmed and interred in Lenin's & Stalin's Mausoleum until 1961.
the county trial courts are courts of jurisdiction.? appellate original review special
The county trial courts are courts of original jurisdiction.
The correct option is B.
The competence of a court to hear and rule on a case prior to any appellate review is called its Original Jurisdiction.
Original jurisdiction is a requirement for a trial court to hear certain sorts of matters.
The law's definition of the Court's original jurisdiction is found in 28 U.S.C. 1251.
According to Section 1251(a), the Court's jurisdiction over one form of issue (disputes between states) is not only "original," but also exclusive.
In other words, only the Supreme Court has the power to exercise jurisdiction under the Constitution if the parties are unable to reach a resolution.
Several minor but significant categories of cases are under the Supreme Court's "original jurisdiction."
To know more about original jurisdiction, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13961368
#SPJ4
How community respond to women and children in light of the bill of rights?
The way that the community responded to women and children in light of the Bill of Rights was to protect the rights of these groups in a variety of ways.
What is the Bill of Rights ?The Bill of Rights is a set of amendments to the US Constitution that outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms of American citizens.
In terms of how communities respond to women and children in light of the Bill of Rights, there are several key factors to consider. One is the right to equal protection under the law, which is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. This means that women and children are entitled to the same legal protections as any other citizen, and cannot be discriminated against on the basis of gender or age.
Find out more on the Bill of Rights at https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
The Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, includes several provisions that protect the rights of women and children.
How does the Constitution protect the rights of individuals?The First Amendment, for example, protects free speech, which can be used to defend the rights of women and children, and the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, which can be used to protect children from abuse.
Therefore, the Bill of Rights provides a framework for protecting the rights of all individuals, including women and children, and communities can respond by working to ensure that these rights are upheld and respected.
Find out more about Bill of Rights at:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
frank suffers from a mental impairment due to a brain injury from a airplane accident. he contracts with glena to purchase her dining room furniture. a month later, he tries to void the contract. if he is unable to return the furniture, a court will not rescind the agreement unless frank can show that glena acted in bad faith.
Frank's situation with the contract and the dining room furniture:Frank suffers from a mental impairment due to a brain injury from an airplane accident.
He entered into a contract with Glena to purchase her dining room furniture. A month later, he tries to void the contract but is unable to return the furniture.
In this case, a court will not rescind the agreement unless Frank can demonstrate that Glena acted in bad faith.
To show bad faith, Frank must provide evidence that Glena knowingly took advantage of his mental impairment during the contracting process or purposely misrepresented information about the furniture.
If Frank successfully proves that Glena acted in bad faith, the court may rescind the contract and provide a remedy for Frank.
To know more about brain injury refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29976587#
#SPJ11
Post-9/11 gi bill housing and kicker payments now require monthly enrollment verification. Would you like to submit yours via text? please reply yes or no.
As a result of recent changes in the law, you must now verify your enrollment status every month to receive your Post-9/11 GI Bill housing allowance and kicker payments. This is to ensure that you are eligible for the benefits and that you are receiving the correct amount. One of the easiest ways to verify your enrollment is by texting us. If you would like to use this option, please reply with YES.
About PaymentsPayment is the voluntary surrender of money or an equivalent or something of value by one party to another in exchange for goods or services provided by them or to fulfill a legal obligation.
Learn More About Payments at https://brainly.com/question/29475683
#SPJ11
Which of the following are required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? (Select all that apply.) art 2 of 3 21 Check All That Apply Skipped Auditors of public companies are allowed to perform nonaudit services for audit clients as long as the audit committee of the company being audited has preapproved those services. Book Print Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Answer:
1. Book Prink Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations.
2. Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned.
3. Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
SOX has several requirements to improve corporate governance and financial reporting.
Retention of audit work papers, auditors of public companies must keep their audit or review work papers for seven years to ensure transparency and accountability.
Accountability of corporate executives, executives who certify fraudulent financial statements risk fines and imprisonment, highlighting the need of correct reporting.
Lead audit partners are rotated, to guarantee independence and objectivity, the primary auditors who oversee corporate audits must change every seven years.
advocates decry denver homeless sweeps ahead of mlbs all-star ...
The statement indicates that Mayor Michael Hancock denies any influence of the MLB's All-Star Game on the city's decisions regarding homeless sweeps.
According to the mayor, the city's actions are not driven by the game but rather by the need to address encampments that have increased during the pandemic. He suggests that the city is merely catching up on cleanups after suspending them at the beginning of the pandemic.
Mayor Michael Hancock maintains that the city's response to homeless encampments is not influenced by the upcoming MLB's All-Star Game. He emphasizes that the resumption of cleanups is a result of the city addressing the growing number of encampments during the pandemic. The mayor asserts that the city's actions are motivated by the need to ensure public health and safety, rather than any event-specific considerations.
To learn more about Mayor Michael Hancock, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29942819
#SPJ4
Advocates decry denver homeless sweeps ahead of mlbs all-star. Explain
Examples of unethical conduct investigating officer should refrain from
An examples of an unethical conduct that an investigating officer should refrain from includes:
lyingdeceptionprejudicediscriminationegoism.What is an unethical conduct?These refers to those behavior exhibited by a professional, which are oppose to what is expected of such individual occupying such position to act in normal circumstance.
Some example of an Unethical behavior from people in power are:
Officers using the Internal Revenue Service to exploit some groups because he hate them.Officer using the public funds for luxury.These unethical behavior of people in power have a massive effect on ordinary citizens and public workers as the masses might lose confidence on ability of the person in power, encourages unethical behavior among officers etc.
Read more about unethical conduct
brainly.com/question/24518056
#SPJ1
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional questions.
Online Content: Site 1
What is perspective and point of view? (Site 1)
What are two different perspectives of the American Revolution? (Site 1)
What can identifying perspective and point of view help you to do? (Site 1)
upon contemplation, geraldo is 99% positive that the defendant is guilty even though the evidence does not clearly support geraldo's position. geraldo's conclusion is considered
Geraldo's conclusion is considered biased or unsupported by evidence.
Geraldo's conclusion of the defendant's guilt, despite the lack of clear supporting evidence, indicates a biased perspective. Being "99% positive" without strong evidence suggests a preconceived notion or personal bias that influences Geraldo's judgment.
It is important to base conclusions on objective evidence rather than personal beliefs or assumptions. Geraldo's position lacks objectivity and may undermine the fairness and accuracy of the judgment. It is crucial to evaluate evidence impartially to ensure a just conclusion.
For more questions like Evidence click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15880833
#SPJ11
criminal lawsuit is distinctive for which of the following reason
trump 2020 baby trump 2020
To address the problems and needs of victims and witnesses, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration funded the first _____ during the mid-1970s
To address the problems and needs of victims and witnesses, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration funded the first Victim-Witness Assistance Programs (VWAP) during the mid-1970s.
The establishment of Victim-Witness Assistance Programs was a significant step towards recognizing and addressing the challenges faced by victims and witnesses within the criminal justice system. Prior to the creation of these programs, victims and witnesses often faced numerous difficulties, including lack of support, information, and protection during the criminal justice process.
The funding provided by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration enabled the development and implementation of comprehensive services aimed at assisting victims and witnesses throughout their involvement in the criminal justice system. These programs offered a range of support services, including crisis intervention, counseling, information about their rights and the legal process, court accompaniment, and assistance with navigating the system.
The primary goal of Victim-Witness Assistance Programs was to ensure that victims and witnesses were treated with respect, compassion, and fairness, while also addressing their practical and emotional needs. By providing specialized services tailored to the unique circumstances of each individual, these programs aimed to reduce the trauma and stress experienced by victims and witnesses, as well as enhance their participation in the criminal justice process.
Over time, the importance of supporting victims and witnesses has been widely recognized, leading to the expansion and improvement of victim-witness services across the United States and in many other countries. Today, Victim-Witness Assistance Programs continue to play a vital role in the criminal justice system, advocating for the rights of victims and witnesses, and working towards creating a more equitable and supportive environment for those affected by crime.
Learn more about witnesses here
https://brainly.com/question/28949858
#SPJ11
who created individual rights
Answer:
The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
Hope this helps :) <3
Answer:james madison
Explanation:The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
Is a coup d’ etat considered force majeure? Discuss its legal implications to the hotel industry which might be used as headquarters in case of military takeover.
The Brazilian Revolt of 1930: A military coup d'état that overthrew President Washington coup d'etat and installed the Brazilian military junta of 1930 followed an armed revolution.
The crime of coup d'etat is a sudden the assault accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth, directed the against duly elected government officials in the Philippines military, as well as any military camp or installation, communications network, public utilities, or other facilities required for the exercise. "A sudden attempt by a small group of people to the take control of the government, the typically via violence," is what a coup d'état is.
To learn more about military, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28357806
#SPJ1
What is the name given to the first clause of a will in which the testator sets forth his or her name and domicile and states that he revokes all previous wills and codicils made by him or her?
Answer:
exordium clause OR publication clause
Explanation:
describtion of this clause:
The introductory paragraph setting out the full name and domincile of the testator and stating that they revoke all previous wills and codicils made at an earlier time.
What are some ways the government uses to implement environmental protections on businesses? (check all that apply)
A. Laws
B. Regulations
C. Permits
D. Incentives
Based on your Week 8 reading, which is NOT one of the three common attitudes toward the natural world?
A. Progress and power
B. Monetize and count
C. Accelerate and innovate
D. Express corporate social responsibility
According to the video lessons, which of the following are true about business leaders and ethical behavior? (check all that apply)
A. Leaders are extra vulnerable to behaving unethically.
B. Unethical behaviors of the leader are often copied by others.
C. Leaders are famous and will end up in the news for unethical behavior.
D. Leaders can’t tell their employees to be ethical if they themselves are unethical.
E. The actions of the leader impact the ethical environment of the company.
1. All of the options - laws, regulations, permits and incentives are some ways the government uses to implement environmental protections on businesses, 2. B. Monetize and count is not a common attitude, 3. E The actions of the leader impact the ethical environment of the company.
The leader will succeed because he has internalized these two key lessons: Men are complex and distinctive. Humans react to a variety of traits and thought patterns that define them as men, including ambition, patriotism, love of the good and the beautiful, boredom, self-doubt, and many more traits and thought patterns that go beyond the usual carrot and stick employed by a donkey driver.
However, not all employee's interests are the same in terms of their power and significance, nor are they all equally amenable to fulfillment in the workplace. Fortunately, people from the same culture tend to have quite similar primary motivations, and there are certain universal motivational guidelines that really do work quite effectively.
To know more about leadership:
https://brainly.com/question/28487636
#SPJ4
can students get Married To school Teachers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)
Essay help- Discuss and resolve the debate, issue, or question of whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit the number of designated classes; e.g., LBTQI etc., or expand them. At what point should the “queering” or “queerness” end? Include in your discussion, how useful the race-class-gender paradigm has been in criminology and its expansion or refinement
Answer:
The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.
Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.
The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.
In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.
Explanation:
The supreme court serves what important function in the us federal goverment
Explanation:
The supreme court has its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government. the president and Congress, recognizes the limits of it's own power
What are some collages that yah recommend that majored in law ?
Answer:
Law school is expensive, but if you have scholarship, it won't be a problem. Here is some good law schools. (Beware, they may be expensive.)
Stanford University.Harvard.Duke University.All have some sort of law included.
I hope this helped at all.How can rights be the flip side of responsibilities?
Right can be fliped to responsibilities because inorder to get rights you have to get reponsibilities and be responsible with your rights
If you are a lawyer and your client is found guilty, what will your next steps
be?
Answer: (Major offense)
Explanation:
Comforting the client, being more than just a lawyer but a friend, and someone they could call on for help. Visiting them while their at their correctional facility, and providing support to the client and the clients family.
Why are drivers responsible for the safety of vulnerable roadway users?
A. They are usually better acquainted with safety and traffic laws.
B. They are usually larger, faster and more protected than VRUS.
C. They are legally bound to take care of VRUs on the roadway.
A , Drivers do do tests on traffic laws and road safety so they are the ones responsible for the safety of VRUs
Drivers are responsible for the safety of vulnerable roadways users because They are usually better acquainted with safety and traffic laws.
Why do drivers exist?Driver software enables your operating system to launch, operate, and manage a hardware device. In other words, drivers are the translators that allow your operating system to instruct the hardware components of your computer to carry out your instructions. Drivers are the software packages in charge of ensuring that your hardware and operating system (such as Windows, Linux, macOS, etc.) are properly communicating with one another.
What do roadways mean?Transportation of people and products via roads is referred to as "roadways." A road is a path connecting two locations that has been constructed or improved to allow for travel.
To learn more about roadways here
https://brainly.com/question/18522414
#SPJ2
Identify 10 religions in the world and speculate a rule peculiar to each
Answer:
Christian
Dydyducruehfydfdrr
OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" of lawyers and
forensic experts were able to raise serious doubts about the CSI work
and analysis of evidence by the LAPD. Below is a list of some of the
issues raised by OJ's defense team. Explain the errors that were made
with more specific details.
Answer:
On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.
Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.
While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.
The proper way in which to make a right turn is:
-Signal and get into the lane nearest the right curb
-Swerve over from the left lane at the last minute
-Slow down and get into the lane nearest the center line
-Approach the corner in the lane nearest the right curb, but move over toward the middle of the street before turning
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Because you always need to signal which way are you turning so avoid a accident
Supply chain and operations management in my previous
workplace as a merchandiser at mall
Answer:
You got this! Determine which equation is false, based on the solution set S:{4}.
3t = 12
3m + 7 = 14
4(4c + 1) = 68
9 = 5p − 11
Explanation: