True, a minimal requirement insisted on by the courts is that employees act in good faith.
The concept of good faith is a fundamental principle of employment law, and it applies to both employees and employers.
In general, it requires that employees act in a manner that is consistent with the terms of their employment agreement, follow workplace policies and procedures, and avoid engaging in any conduct that may harm the interests of their employer.
For example, an employee who breaches their confidentiality agreement by sharing sensitive company information with a competitor would not be acting in good faith.
Similarly, an employee who engages in discriminatory behavior or harassment towards their colleagues would also be considered to be acting in bad faith.
In some cases, an employee's failure to act in good faith may lead to disciplinary action, termination of employment, or legal consequences.
For instance, an employer may be able to sue an employee for breach of contract or breach of fiduciary duty if the employee's actions resulted in financial harm to the company.
Overall, the concept of good faith is an important principle in employment law that reflects the expectation that employees will act honestly and with integrity in their work.
Courts generally view good faith as a minimal requirement for employees, and failure to act in good faith can have serious consequences for both the employee and the employer.
To learn more about confidentiality, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/15869788
#SPJ11
How does social change happen?
Answer:
social change happens by getting into a relationship, having a friend, new electronics
Explanation:
Question 7 of 10
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade with
wealthy partners.
B. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade.
O C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade.
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade.
Answer: C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more favorable terms of trade.
Explanation:
Just got it right!
An insured receives an annual life insurance dividend check. What term best describes this arrangement?
The term that best describes the arrangement where an insured receives an annual life insurance dividend check is "participating life insurance."
What is participating life insurance ?Participating life insurance is a type of permanent life insurance policy that allows policyholders to receive a share of the insurance company's profits in the form of annual dividend payments. These dividends are not guaranteed, but are based on the company's financial performance and the policyholder's share of ownership in the company's surplus.
Policyholders who own participating life insurance policies are considered "participating policyholders," and are entitled to vote on certain company matters, such as the election of the board of directors.
Find out more on participating life insurance at https://brainly.com/question/15508888
#SPJ1
What was the court's majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson?
On Plato
Answer:
majority opinion by Henry B. Brown. The Court held that the state law was constitutional. In an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation.
What is an average drivers reaction time
Answer:
A professional driver who is physically fit and trained in high-speed driving might have a reaction time of 0.2 seconds for a given situation, while the average motorist may have a slower reaction time of 0.5 seconds, 0.8 seconds or even 1 second.
Explanation:
Answer:
about a second or .5 a second
Explanation:
with reference to contract terms express implied and innominate critically discuss the law relating to exemption clause in kenya
In Kenya, an exemption clause is a term in a contract that seeks to exempt or limit the liability of one or both parties to a contract. It could exclude the liability of one party, limit the amount that can be recovered from the party, or impose certain conditions that must be met before the party is held liable.
There are various types of contract terms in Kenya, including express terms, implied terms, and innominate terms.Express terms are those terms that the parties to the contract have agreed upon and put into writing. They can be in writing or oral, but they must be clear and specific.
Implied terms, on the other hand, are terms that are not expressly stated but are deemed to be part of the contract. They are either implied by law or by fact. Innominates are terms that are neither expressly stated nor implied, but they are critical to the performance of the contract.
To know more about exemption visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16644936
#SPJ11
according to eeo regulations, an individual who wants to initiate the eeo complaint process must contact an eeo counselor within ____ of the date of the alleged discriminatory action, or, in the case of a personnel action, the effective date of the action
An individual who wants to file an EEO complaint must contact the EEO office within 45 calendar days of the date when he or she knew or should have known about the alleged discriminatory act, or in the case of a personnel action, within 45 calendar days of the effective date.
Laws governing equal employment opportunities (EEO) forbid some forms of job discrimination in particular workplaces. The Civil Rights Center and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs are two U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) organizations that deal with EEO monitoring and enforcement. When all employees are treated fairly and equitably in all facets of their jobs, this is known as equal employment opportunity (EEO). This means that regardless of their personal characteristics like gender, ethnicity, colour, or creed, people have equal access to work possibilities based purely on their ability to perform the job. Wages are one instance of a problem with equal opportunity in the workplace. It is unacceptable to pay someone less due to discrimination. Someone should be paid equally for doing the same job as another employee if they are performing it just as well.
Learn more about EEO here
https://brainly.com/question/27882506
#SPJ4
The unknown informant called the city of calbayog city police station to relay the information that the accused was going to catarman with a bag filled of marijuana, Acting on the said information, The police officer placed the accused under the surveillance. When the accused boarded a bus bound from catarman carrying a piece of luggage, The team leader instructed the chechpoint to stop the bus, as soon as the bus reached the checkpoint, the police officer opened the luggage of the accused and found marijuana inside, Is the warrantless seizure of the marijuana illegal? explain!
YES that is very illegal
Police may randomly stop a vehicle to check the driver's license and registration.
True
False
choice of law clauses in contracts stipulate in advance which country's laws will apply to a dispute regardless of which court hears the case. true or false
Choice of law clauses in contracts are used to specify the country's laws that will apply to a dispute in case it arises, regardless of where the case is heard. These clauses are common in international contracts where parties involved may belong to different countries, and therefore, the question of which country's laws apply can be complex.
True. Choice of law clauses in contracts are used to specify the country's laws that will apply to a dispute in case it arises, regardless of where the case is heard. These clauses are common in international contracts where parties involved may belong to different countries, and therefore, the question of which country's laws apply can be complex. By stipulating in advance which country's laws will apply, parties can avoid uncertainty and potential disputes that may arise from conflicts of laws. The choice of law clause is binding, and parties are expected to abide by it unless it is challenged in court and proven to be unfair or unreasonable. Overall, choice of law clauses play a vital role in international business and help to streamline legal proceedings and ensure consistency in decision-making.
to know more about international visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31944920
#SPJ11
The Smiths decided to contract with Porches-R-Us to build a new front porch on their house.The Smiths asked them to use an ash railing; however Porches-R-Us used an oak railing. The Smiths may argue that they should have specific performance, in that they should receive the ash railing. Porches-R-Us may counter argue that they substantially performed because they look and function similarly.
Answer:
In the clarification segment underneath the definition of the query has been mentioned.
Explanation:
There seems to be a contract violation when Smiths required porches-R-US to use those same ash handrails, but perhaps the oak railings were chosen. This is also why it was a violation of the contract. Whenever the breach of warranty interacts with either the property and land appears distinctive, precise success throughout the contract breach is more appropriate. The details discuss the changes to either the land, but that will be at both the discretion of the judge.The substantive consistency doctrine seems to be a legal concept which states that unless sincerity is maintained to fulfill the provisions of the act, although it doesn't exactly fulfill the details of the contract or the legislative requirements, the achievement shall be deemed complete because the primary purpose is identified.There seem to be no examples according to the above situation to suggest that porches-r-us utilized intellectual honesty throughout the wrong timber.
There would have been no violation of the contract if indeed the contractor converted the timber towards oak instead of just ash.
You are working to design a map each area you are designing will take up to 10 hours to make how many hours will it take you to design 7 areas
Answer:
It would take 70 hours to design 7 areas
Explanation:
7 × 10
Do you think it would be useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence? Why or why not?
It is useful to determine the chemical properties of any of the evidence because if there is a strange substance near or on the victim that may be able to tell a cause of death.
What are chemical properties?Chemical properties are any characteristics of a substance that can only be formed by changing its chemical identity. Chemical properties are those that manifest themselves during or after a chemical reaction.
Simply put, looking at or feeling a substance's chemical properties is impossible; instead, the substance's internal structure must be significantly altered in order to conduct an investigation into its chemical properties. When a substance undergoes a chemical reaction, it undergoes chemical change, which results in significant changes in its properties. However, a catalytic feature would be an additional chemical feature.
Therefore, the chemical properties of the evidence helps to determine the cause of death.
Learn more about Chemical properties here:
brainly.com/question/1935242
#SPJ2
if the fair debt collection act prohibits these actions, why do you think the debt collectors in the story were using the tactics anyway?
If the fair debt collection act prohibits these actions, the debt collectors in the story were using the tactics anyway to recover their debts by force.
What is debt collection act?
The fair debt collection activities act is a consumer protection amendment to the consumer credit protection act that creates legal protection from unfair debt collection practices. The statute's stated objectives are to stop unfair debt collection methods, to encourage fair debt collection, and to give customers a way to challenge and validate debt information to assure the veracity of the information. The Act specifies fines and other consequences for violations of the Act, establishes guidelines for how debt collectors may conduct their business, and outlines consumers' rights when interacting with debt collectors. On rare occasions, it coincides with the fair credit reporting act.
Know more about debt collection act - brainly.com/question/29629153
#SPJ4
True or False The Surpreme Court consists of 7 members and One Chief Justice and 6 associate justices.
\(false\)
The Surpreme Court consists of 9 members and One Chief Justice and 8 associate justices.
How did the colonists respond to the Intolerable Acts of 1774?
A.
They sent the Olive Branch Petition to King George III.
B.
They had British troops arrested for attacking colonial troops.
C.
They wrote a list of compaints at the First Continental Congress.
D.
They created the Sons of Liberty group to boycott British goods.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I think D because the sons of liberty would boycott British goods. This was to show "No taxation without representation"
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
Which one of the following crimes enjoys no statute of limitations? a. Fraud b. Murder c. Larceny d. Traffic violation e. Insider trading
The correct answer is b. Murder.
In many jurisdictions, murder is considered a crime that enjoys no statute of limitations. This means that there is no time limit for prosecuting someone for the offense of murder.
The rationale behind this is the seriousness and gravity of the crime, as well as the fact that murder is considered to be an offense against the state and a violation of the most fundamental right to life. Other crimes, such as fraud, larceny, traffic violations, and insider trading, typically have specific statutes of limitations that vary depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offense.
Learn more about on Murder, here:
brainly.com/question/8560787
#SPJ11
Creative commons-attribution is the free distribution of copyrighted work _____________ the proper credit to the creator.
A creative commons-attribution is the free distribution of copyrighted work with the proper credit to the creator.
What is a creative commons-attribution?It relates to a public copyright licenses that enable the free distribution of an otherwise copyrighted work.
The practice is that a creative commons license is acquired and used when an author wants to give other people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that the author has created.
Read more about creative commons
brainly.com/question/20893085
#SPJ1
In a perfectly competitive market, the seller is the
Explanation:
There are a large number of buyers and sellers in a perfectly competitive market. The sellers are small firms, instead of large corporations capable of controlling prices through supply adjustments. They sell products with minimal differences in capabilities, features, and pricing. Brainliest pls
Sharksinthepool.biz Inc. is a Nevada manufacturing company that sells an elbow-stiffening device for pool players. The device holds the elbow in the proper position for a smooth and accurate follow through while cueing a ball. The device has been very popular for several years and has only been sold on the Internet to customers throughout the United States as well as in Japan, Canada, Mexico, Europe, and South America. Recent research into the use of this device has found that even moderate use may cause a pinched-nerve syndrome somewhat like carpel tunnel but in the user’s elbow. You are the founder and president of the company. You are extremely concerned about the lawsuits that may be filed against your company. Where may these suits be filed? What jurisdiction’s law will be used to decide these cases once filed?
The lawsuits for a defective or dangerous product might be filed at an international court, and the jurisdiction's law for these cases is the international jury that will make a decision based on product liability laws.
In the United States and other countries, consumers can sue companies if a product is defective or it is dangerous. In the United States, this legal aspect is regulated by product liability laws.
These laws establish any consumer can sue the company before a local court, especially a state court. Moreover, the legal process is usually carried out within the state court and the final decision is made by the local jury.
Despite this, in some situations, such as if the product affected people in different countries the International Court of Justice is in charge, and the jury in there makes the decision.
Based on this, it is likely an International Court of Justice files the lawsuit because there are customers from different countries and the jurisdiction's law is an international jury.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/20762911
What is the best description of Jefferson's overall purpose in these opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence?
Thomas Jefferson's primary goal in writing the Declaration of Independence was to produce a persuasive statement that outlined the reasons why America needed to secede from Great Britain.
Jefferson has been criticized more and more by academics despite being long recognized as America's most notable "apostle of liberty." At the popular level, both domestically and internationally, he continues to be an illustrious icon who serves as an inspiration for both major American political parties, as well as for dissidents in communist China, liberal reformers in central and eastern Europe, and aspirant democratic candidates in Africa and Latin America.
His reputation among academics has suffered, too, as the emphasis on racial equality has led to a more unfavorable reappraisal of his reliance on slavery and his idea that American society should continue to be a white man's dominion.
Learn more about Thomas Jefferson's here
https://brainly.com/question/13302527
#SPJ4
Mauro creates an online advertisement for his brokerage. He includes his brokerage's name at the end of the email but, because his advertisement is allowed a very limited wordcount, omits their point of contact information. Evaluate.
Due to the limited word limits for his marketing, he concludes the email with the name of his brokerage but omits their method of contact.
Broker is a term used to describe a person or company that acts as a middleman between a buyer and a seller, or between an investor and a securities exchange, and who purchases and sells goods or assets on behalf of other people. Brokers are businesses that act as customers' agents and get payment from customers in the form of commissions.
You may be referring to the entire following even though your query is incomplete: A broker established a website with the brokerage's name, address, and phone number.
Learn more about advertisement.
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ4
How was the political world also tied to personal life in the Classical world? Also, how was personal life also political in the Classical world? Compare examples from at least two societies (Persia, Rome, Athens or Early Christianity). If needed you can choose multiple societies.
In the Classical world, the political and personal realms were deeply interconnected, with the actions and decisions of individuals having significant implications on both spheres. The intertwining of politics and personal life can be observed in various Classical societies, including Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity.
In Persia, the political world was closely tied to personal life through the concept of kingship. The Persian king, known as the Shah or Emperor, held absolute power and was considered the embodiment of divine authority. Personal loyalty and obedience to the king were highly valued, and failure to demonstrate loyalty could result in severe consequences. The personal lives of individuals were therefore heavily influenced by their allegiance to the political order, as any perceived disloyalty could lead to loss of status, exile, or even execution. Similarly, in Rome, personal life was intertwined with politics, particularly among the ruling elite. The concept of "mos maiorum" emphasized the importance of upholding traditional Roman values and social norms. The political success and reputation of individuals often depended on their adherence to these societal expectations in their personal conduct, such as maintaining strong family ties, demonstrating virtuous behavior, and fulfilling public duties. Personal scandals or moral transgressions could have detrimental effects on one's political standing and aspirations for office.In Athens, personal life was also political in nature, especially for male citizens who actively participated in the democratic system. Athenian citizens were expected to engage in public affairs, attend assemblies, and serve in various civic roles. The political participation of individuals was closely tied to their personal reputation and honor within the community. The ability to deliver persuasive speeches, form alliances, and gain the trust of fellow citizens played crucial roles in shaping one's political influence. Additionally, decisions made within the family unit, such as the selection of marriage partners or the upbringing of children, could have political implications, as alliances and connections formed through familial ties could influence political networks.
In Early Christianity, personal life was intertwined with politics through the establishment of a distinct religious community with its own moral codes and expectations. Early Christians faced persecution and oppression from the Roman Empire, which sought to suppress the growth of this new religious movement. The personal beliefs and practices of Christians often clashed with the dominant political and social norms of the time, leading to conflicts and tensions. Personal decisions to adhere to Christian teachings, participate in communal rituals, or openly identify as Christians were inherently political acts that challenged the established order.
Overall, in the Classical world, the political and personal spheres were intimately connected. Loyalty to rulers, adherence to societal norms, political participation, and religious affiliations all influenced personal lives and vice versa. The examples of Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity demonstrate the complex interplay between politics and personal life, highlighting how individual actions and choices carried broader political significance in these societies.
To know more about Classical world, click here https://brainly.com/question/5338138
#SPJ11
Communications about legal services General Rule
Under the general rule, communications about legal services must be truthful and not misleading. This means that lawyers cannot make false or unsubstantiated claims about their services or their experience.
They also cannot create an unjustified expectation about the outcome of a case. Additionally, lawyers must ensure that their communications do not create confusion or misunderstandings about their services or fees. They must also be mindful of the confidentiality of their clients and cannot reveal any information that would compromise their client's interests. In summary, communications about legal services must be honest, accurate, and clear, and must not violate any ethical rules or standards.
For more such questions on lawyers , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29731616
#SPJ11
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
"If you were appealing a case decided by one of the federal
district courts in New York State, which court would you appeal
to"
If you were appealing a case decided by one of the federal district courts in New York State, you would appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is the appropriate court to which you would appeal a case decided by a federal district court in New York State. The Second Circuit is one of the thirteen federal courts of appeals in the United States, and it has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts located within its geographic jurisdiction, which includes New York, Connecticut, and Vermont.
When you appeal a case, you are asking a higher court to review the decision made by the lower court. In this scenario, the federal district court in New York State serves as the trial court where the case was initially heard and decided. If you are dissatisfied with the district court's decision, you have the right to appeal it to a higher court, which, in this case, would be the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is responsible for reviewing the legal arguments presented by the parties involved in the case and assessing whether the district court made any errors in applying the law. It does not conduct a retrial or consider new evidence; its role is to review the lower court's decision for legal errors or issues. The Second Circuit has the power to affirm the district court's decision, modify it, or even reverse it.
Learn more about courts
brainly.com/question/12278977
#SPJ11
After reading the cases African American Cases--Part I--Brown Trilogy Turning Point and Part II--Historical Cases and watching the video "The Road to Brown". tell whether or not the legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) today. why and why not?
The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
What is a political Conservative?Conservatism in the United States is seen as a form of a political and social philosophy that is known to be based on traditionalism as well as republicanism, and hindered by the federal governmental power in association to U.S. states.
Note that The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
Learn more about Supreme Court from
https://brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ1
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people
What is the environmental impact assessment act, and its
benefits? (please answer in a detailed non- plagiarized answer
)
The Environmental Impact Assessment Act evaluates and manages the environmental impacts of proposed projects, promoting sustainable development and environmental protection.
A framework for assessing and managing the potential environmental effects of proposed projects or activities is established by the Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Its main advantages include promoting sustainable development by taking into account social, economic and environmental factors, protecting the environment by identifying and mitigating negative effects and facilitating public participation in decision making processes.
The act promotes project enhancements and modifications, ensures adherence to environmental regulations and provides comprehensive information on environmental impacts to enable informed decision making. The EIA Act promotes more environmentally conscious and sustainable development, ecosystem protection and a balance between development and conservation by incorporating environmental factors into project planning.
Learn more about Environmental Impact Assessment Act. at:
brainly.com/question/33015812
#SPJ4