A municipality establishes development goals in its comprehensive plans.
Community planning is "a process that tries to include all members of the community to build a more prosperous, convenient, equitable, healthy, and attractive place for present and future generations," according to the American Planning Association. Planning for the community's future growth and development is one of the essential duties of local government. The comprehensive plan is the guiding document that emerges from this planning process. Remember that a zoning ordinance and a comprehensive plan are two independent tools that are utilized in tandem with one another. A zoning ordinance governs the suggested land uses made by the comprehensive plan, whereas the comprehensive plan serves as a guide and offers suggestions on how property should be used to satisfy the requirements and preferences of the community.
To learn more about comprehensive plans please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/10586540
#SPJ4
Which person is a victim of identity theft?
Suzie, whose e-mail was stolen and used to apply for a credit card from a major retailer
Michael, whose credit score was stolen and used to make a down payment on a home
Pam, whose smartphone was stolen and used to make a mortgage payment
Thomas, whose credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store
Answer:
thomas
Explanation:
just did test
Thomas is a victim of identity theft because his credit card information was stolen and maxed out at a jewelry store.
What is identity theft?Identity theft happens when someone commits fraud or another crime using another person's personal information—such as their name, identification number, or credit card number—without that person's consent. In 1964, the phrase "identity theft" was first used. Since that time, both the U.K. and the U.S. have statutory definitions of identity theft that include the theft of personally identifiable information.
Identity theft purposefully utilizes someone else's identity as a technique to acquire financial advantages or obtain credit and other benefits, and potentially to create other person's disadvantages or loss. When someone's identity is stolen, bad things can happen to them, especially if they are wrongly accused of being the offender.
Therefore, Thomas is an victim of identity theft.
To learn more about identity theft, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29898436
#SPJ7
The area of consumer protection has given rise to a myriad of statutes at both the federal and state level that seek to protect the consumer from the dangers of the marketplace. (Ch. 44) Identify and discuss any three (3) specific areas of consumer activity that have become a focus of this type of legislation. Consumer Protection Ch 44 Please note that this area of law is reflective of many statutes that address the subject matter, only some of which, are referenced within this outline. Introduction Consumer transactions defined as goods, credit, services or land for personal, household or family purposes (cf. caveat emptor - "let the buyer beware" A. State and federal Consumer Protection Agencies Abuses include credit, deceptive trade practices, unsafe products, unfair pricing. 1) State and local consumer protection agencies-address fraudulent and deceptive trade and sales practices, defective goods and services 2) Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-re: used cars, franchises, funerals, door to door sales etc. unfair competition (ant- trust) unfair and deceptive trade practices deception-misrepresentation, omission or practice likely to mislead advertising substantiation -reasonable basis for advertising claims 3) Remedies Affirmative disclosure Corrective advertising Cease and desist orders 4) Consumer Product Safety Commission - protects public re unsafe products, evaluates products, uniform standards, excludes autos, tires, tobacco, firearms, food. drugs among others and enforcement re: hazardous substances 5) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau-authority over consumer financial products or services 6) Other federal consumer protection agencies- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) -autos, etc. Federal Drug administration (FDA)-food, tobacco, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, etc. B. Consumer purchases State contract law (UCC Art 2) provide many rights and obligations 1) Federal warranty protection -applies to sellers of consumer goods who give written warranties (ensure certain features of consumer goods or services) 2) As per Magnusson Moss Warranty Act need provide adequate assurance re: warranties (disclosures, labeling, disclaimers) 3) State lemon laws-provides new car purchasers w/ rights 4) Consumer right of rescission w/n 3 days of signing C. Consumer Credit Transactions Applies to any credit transactions re: goods, services or land for personal, household or family- Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) 1) Access to the market-addresses discrimination in extending credit/ several applicable statutory protections 2) Disclosure requirements Truth - in- Lending Act (TILA) provides information such as charges, late fees etc. re: credit accounts 3) Among areas addressed are: Home equity loans fixed amount secured by home Billing errors re: disputed amounts Settlement charges -applies to real estate escrow accounts Mortgage Reform and Anti- Predatory Lending Act 4) Contract terms- FTC limit rights of holders in due course when debt arises out of consumer credit transaction 5) Consumer credit card fraud- limits liability for unauthorized use up to $50 6) Fair reportage- Fair Credit Reporting Act (FRCA) -prohibits use of inaccurate or dated information in consumer reports 7) Credit card bill of rights re: interest rates, notices, payments and penalties D. Creditor remedies 1) Wage assignments - protects against discharge from employment Garnishment -only by court order 2) Security interest in goods- seller may retain security interest in goods sold w/ restrictions 3) Debt collection practices-prohibitions on abusive, deceptive, unfair practices including harassing conduct
Numerous federal and state laws have been passed in the field of law known as consumer protection in an effort to protect consumers from the risks present in the marketplace. Three specific consumer activities that have come under the purview of such legislation are as follows:
1. Purchases by consumers: This refers to the sale of products and services, as well as real estate, for private, domestic, or familial use. For instance, written warranties offered by vendors of consumer goods are covered under the Federal Warranty Protection. On the other hand, new automobile buyers have rights under lemon laws.
2. The use of consumer credit: It covers all credit agreements for purchases of commodities, services, or real estate made for private, domestic, or familial use. The Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (FCCPA) is applicable to a number of legal protections, such as banning discrimination in credit-granting.
3. Credit Remedies: There are many different types of creditor remedies, including wage assignments, garnishments, security interests in property, and debt collection techniques. Garnishment is only legal with a court order, and wage assignments guard against termination from employment. The credit card bill of rights places restrictions on credit card users' interest rates, notifications, payments, and penalties, and fair reporting forbids the use of inaccurate or out-of-date information in consumer reports. Protecting consumers from dishonest and misleading business practices, as well as faulty goods and services, is the responsibility of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other government consumer protection organizations, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
To know more about the purpose of Consumer Rights:
https://brainly.com/question/27317480
#SPJ11
COMPARE THE QUALIFICATION, FUNCTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF NBI AND PCG. WRITE AN ESSAY ABOUT THE COMPARISON THAT YOU HAVE DONE.
the constitution provides a basis for a right to privacy. True/False ?
The constitution provides a basis for a right to privacy. - True
Justice Louis D. Brandeis argued in his opinion in Gilbert v. Minnesota (1920) that the First Amendment protected a person's right to privacy in their own home despite the fact that the United States Constitution does not specifically mention privacy.
The Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy is a basic right and that it is derived from other fundamental rights protected by the constitution, such as the right to life and the right to personal liberty. The Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments have all been interpreted by the courts to build a foundation for such a right, despite the fact that the right to privacy is not expressly stated in the Constitution.
Read more about Constitution on:
brainly.com/question/21235714
#SPJ4
in light of the current issue of IPV and crimes against women, briefly discuss what the implications will be for the police, the courts and correctional services?
Answer:
The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims
Explanation:
Considering the recent concern of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and violations against women, there are huge ramifications for the police, the courts, and correctional administrations.
The police should focus on preparing and responsiveness towards casualties, guaranteeing appropriate treatment of cases and offering help. The courts will confront expanded caseloads, requesting productive and fair settlement, as well as the requirement for defensive measures. Restorative administrations should address the recovery and wellbeing of culprits while safeguarding casualties' freedoms.
Cooperative endeavors and changes around there are critical to battle IPV actually and guarantee equity, assurance, and backing for ladies impacted by these wrongdoings.
Learn more about police, from:
brainly.com/question/2166731
#SPJ7
4. Why is it important for criminal defendants to have rights before, during, and after trial?
It is important for criminal defendants to have rights before, during, and after trial to protect them from unfair treatment and ensure a fair and just legal process.
These rights, enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, include the right to an attorney, the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to remain silent, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Without these protections, criminal defendants would be at risk of arbitrary detention, abuse, and mistreatment by law enforcement or the judicial system. Ensuring that defendants have access to these rights helps to uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and due process, and helps to prevent wrongful convictions and other miscarriages of justice.
Find out more about criminal defendants
brainly.com/question/29183359
#SPJ11
I have the answer now .
yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day
How can the Magna Carta be considered a revolutionary document??
Answer:
Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial
Explain the four key elements of the conflict perspective. Describe how radical criminology differs from more conservative conflict theories. Discuss the policy directions that modern radical criminologists envision and explain how they differ from the policies earlier radical criminologists advocated.
Answer:
Explanation:
Conflict Perspective has approach of viewing society as a constantly changing entity, due to competition for scarce resources.
Four key elements are :
Competition Revolution, Structural Inequality Conflict / WarIt is the responsibility of _________________ to make sure that the data is collected and used without violating any privacy laws or regulations, and that the data is stored securely.
It is the responsibility of the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) to make sure that the data is collected and used without violating any privacy laws or regulations, and that the data is stored securely.
The chief information security officer (CISO) of an organization serves as its leader and public face when it comes to matters of data security. The data security officer's duties include coming up with plans for protecting information in the event of an attack and implementing those plans. A CISO's initial step in this direction is to inventory the company's sensitive data and record it in a central repository. In this manner, they may learn about the threats to this data and the weaknesses in the existing IT infrastructure. From this, they may develop comprehensive policies and put in place targeted technologies to safeguard this information and keep their businesses in accordance with privacy legislation controlling sensitive data.
CISOs will also be responsible for disseminating information about cybersecurity to the rest of the organization, including but not limited to: threats, vulnerabilities in the cybersecurity environment, best practices for mitigating those vulnerabilities, the value of implementing new cybersecurity technology, recommendations for employee cybersecurity training, and breach or incident response plans. The CISO is ultimately responsible for responding to and recovering from any threat.
learn more about data security here- https://brainly.com/question/25720881
#SPJ4
Each Year about 200 children under the age of six are killed while playing in the family drive way true or false?
Answer:
correct answer is on a up
border patrol ten codes
Answer:
10-1. Receiving Poorly
10-2. Receiving Well
10-3. Disregard.
10-4. Acknowledged.
10-5. Be on the Lookout (BOLO)
10-6. Temporarily Busy.
10-7. Out of Service - Unavailable.
10-8. In service - Available.
The United States taxes each barrel of imported oil at a flat rate. This is
a. an antidumping duty.
b. a dumping duty.
c. a quota.
d. a tariff.
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher willA. be required to attend a substance abuse courseB. automatically have their license suspended for one yearC. be imprisoned for up to one yearD. not be allowed to drink alcohol until they are 25
Any driver under 21 who is found to have a BAL of .05 or higher will be required to attend a substance abuse course. The right answer is a.
Any driver under 21 who is pulled over by law enforcement and also has a.02 or greater blood alcohol content will certainly have their licence suspended for six months.
Every driver under 21 who has a.05 or higher breath alcohol concentration or blood alcohol concentration is compelled to take a substance abuse course. For any and all drivers under the age of 19, a test will be finished, and the results will be communicated to parents or legal guardians.
The correct answer is option a.
Know more about substance abuse course here
https://brainly.com/question/14311822
#SPJ4
What role is most likely to be involved in preparing tax documents? A. Information security analyst O B. HR specialist O C. Accountant D. Financial examiner
The role that is most likely to be involved in preparing tax documents is Accountant. Therefore, the correct option is C.
This is because accountants are specifically trained and educated in areas related to tax laws and regulations, and are responsible for helping individuals and businesses prepare and file their tax returns accurately and on time. Hence, accountants are responsible for preparing, examining, and analyzing financial records, including tax documents, to ensure accuracy and compliance with laws and regulations.
Information security analysts are responsible for protecting computer networks and systems from security breaches, while HR specialists focus on managing employee relations and personnel issues. Financial examiners, on the other hand, are responsible for examining financial institutions to ensure they are following proper regulations and procedures.
None of these roles typically involve preparing tax documents as a primary responsibility, making the accountant the most likely choice. Therefore, the role most likely to be involved in preparing tax documents is option C: Accountant.
Learn more about Financial records:
https://brainly.com/question/30529387
#SPJ11
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.
"Pro-death" is a loaded phrase? T or F
Answer:
True
Explanation:
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
as long as the child is in a safety seat, it doesn't matter if they are strapped into a front passenger seat or a back passenger seat.
What are the consequences from being caught driving under the influence of alcohol or other
drugs?
A Driver license revocation
B Imprisonment
C Fines
D All of the above
Answer:
Passports. Driving while under the influence of alcohol can lead to legal consequences in the form of a DUI, fines, court-ordered treatment, jail time, job loss and more. One of the greatest hazards of drinking is that one’s intention, such as simply having a good time, can get lost once the intoxicating effects take hold.
Explanation:
i think its A
Should considerations of justice be limited to the bounds of a
given state or should they reach further? What are the advantages
and disadvantages of each position?
Answer:
The question of whether considerations of justice should be limited to the bounds of a given state or should reach further is a complex and debated topic. Different perspectives exist on this matter, each with its advantages and disadvantages.
1. Limiting considerations of justice to the bounds of a given state:
Advantages:
a. Practicality and Manageability: Focusing on justice within a specific state allows for a more manageable approach to addressing societal issues. It is easier to develop and enforce laws, policies, and institutions within a defined jurisdiction.
b. National Self-Determination: Prioritizing justice within a state respects the principle of national self-determination, allowing each state to determine its legal system and policies based on the will of its citizens.
c. Cultural and Contextual Relevance: Justice systems often reflect the values, customs, and traditions of a particular society. Limiting considerations of justice to a state acknowledges the importance of cultural and contextual relevance in defining and implementing justice.
Disadvantages:
a. Global Interconnectedness: In today's interconnected world, issues such as climate change, human rights violations, and global poverty transcend national boundaries. Limiting justice considerations to a state may ignore the interconnected nature of these problems, hindering effective solutions.
b. Inequality and Injustice: Restricting justice to the state level can perpetuate global inequalities, as states with more resources and power may prioritize their interests over the needs of others. This can result in systemic injustice and exploitation, especially in relations between wealthy and poorer nations.
c. Transnational Crimes and Challenges: Crimes such as terrorism, human trafficking, and cybercrime often operate across borders. Limiting justice considerations to the state level can make it more challenging to address these transnational issues effectively.
2. Extending considerations of justice beyond the bounds of a given state:
Advantages:
a. Addressing Global Injustices: Expanding justice considerations beyond state boundaries allows for a more comprehensive approach to addressing global injustices, such as human rights violations, environmental degradation, and economic inequality.
b. Shared Responsibility: Recognizing that justice is a global concern encourages collective responsibility among nations to work together towards fairer and more equitable outcomes for all.
c. Moral Imperative: Many argue that justice should not be limited by arbitrary borders and that fundamental rights and values should extend to all individuals, regardless of their nationality or place of residence.
Disadvantages:
a. Sovereignty and Autonomy: Extending justice considerations beyond state bounds can raise concerns about encroachment on state sovereignty and autonomy. Some argue that states should have the right to determine their justice systems and priorities without external interference.
b. Complexity and Implementation Challenges: Implementing justice on a global scale is complex and challenging. Diverse legal systems, cultural differences, and conflicting interests among nations can complicate efforts to establish a unified approach to justice.
c. Unequal Influence: Expanding justice considerations beyond the state level may lead to the domination of more powerful nations or organizations in shaping global justice frameworks, potentially disregarding the voices and needs of less influential or marginalized states.
Explanation:
In conclusion, the question of whether considerations of justice should be limited to a given state or should reach further involves weighing practicality, sovereignty, global interconnectedness, and moral imperatives. Both positions have their advantages and disadvantages, and striking a balance between national self-determination and addressing global challenges is an ongoing challenge in the pursuit of justice.
What is an example of contractionary economic policy?
A) Lowering the interest rate at which banks borrow money
B) Increases to the corporate tax rate
C) Executive orders that reduce regulations on businesses
D) Spending programs aimed at repairing infrastructure
Answer: B
Explanation: Increases to the corporate tax rate
What law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards?.
The stamp act was the law taxed all legal documents, permits, contracts, newspapers, and playing cards.
About the stamp act
Any law that mandates the payment of a tax on the transferring of specific papers is referred to as a stamp act. All who pay the taxes get their papers legally stamped, which makes them official documents. Stamp acts have historically applied to a wide range of things, including playing cards, dice, prescription medications, checks, mortgages, contracts, marriage licences, and newspapers. After paying the duty, the objects are frequently physically stamped at authorised government offices, however more practical and usual procedures involve paying a fixed amount annually or purchasing adhesive stamps.
To know more about the stamp act:
brainly.com/question/19013647
#SPJ4
which of the following are characteristic of a stable government? (check all that apply.)
A stable government typically exhibits several key characteristics, including effective leadership, a strong legal system, transparent decision-making, respect for the rule of law, and economic stability. Additionally, a stable government fosters social cohesion, promotes citizens' rights, and maintains national security. By exhibiting these characteristics, a stable government can effectively address the needs of its people and ensure long-term success.
There are several characteristics that are typically associated with a stable government. One of the most important is the rule of law, which ensures that individuals and organizations are held accountable for their actions and that disputes are settled fairly and impartially. Another important characteristic is effective governance, which requires strong institutions and competent leadership. A stable government is also typically responsive to the needs and desires of its citizens, and is able to provide basic services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Finally, a stable government is typically able to maintain a sense of social cohesion and stability, even in the face of external challenges or internal disagreements. Overall, a stable government is characterized by a high level of trust and confidence in its institutions and leadership, and is able to promote peace, prosperity, and security for its citizens.
To know more about leadership visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32010814
#SPJ11
During job interviews, potential employers often ask candidates to describe a time where they have demonstrated their initiative and/or results-driven skills. This week, you’ll have a chance to practice.
Answer:
The definition is defined throughout the clarification subsection below and according to the condition given.
Explanation:
Throughout my college, there may have been a dilemma that the students had to tackle, which would have been our university canteen behind every college. A dustbin all over the inside of the cafeteria was used by the learners who ate throughout the college canteen to take possession of the garbage. Yet I noticed that certain students took some more of the nutrition that would have been taken away common parking area and began eating elsewhere.The participants sometimes used to knock through one corner when there is not a particular dustbin available throughout the parking structure, that further can't produce a pleasant scene mostly on the university campus. They sometimes used completely disregard something and carry on, although most of the participants continued to see something like this. I considered this quite troubling after I saw something and took the chance to tackle this issue and contact the accountable heading off the college.Discussion Questions: How does current administration's immigration policy impact
economic, security, and humanitarian policy? How was it treated prior to 9/11? Due to the
current policy, what are the challenges that the United States has regarding securing both
the US/Canada and US/Mexico borders? Do you believe the U.S. policy treats illegal
migrants with dignity? How has the COVID pandemic impacted this policy? (LO1.1 & LO1.2)
1. The current administration's immigration policy has impacted the federal government's economic, security, and humanitarian policy by reinforcing national security while failing to marry the economic and humanitarian disasters and benefits of immigration.
2. Before 9/11, immigration was regarded as a humanitarian way of national openness and was never a security concern.
3. The current immigration policy has mandated the United States to create the Department of Home Security, charged with ensuring safe land borders with Canada and Mexico.
4. Following the creation of the Department of Home Security, the dignity accorded to migrants, whether legal or illegal, has been completely lost on the altar of physical and economic security.
5. The COVID pandemic worsened the U.S. immigration policy because it imposed outright border closures. As a result, the closures brought untold hardships to migrants, who were left stranded at the Canada and Mexico borders with humanitarian catastrophes.
What is immigration?Immigration is the international movement of people who leave their countries of origin to reside in another country or become citizens.
Many reasons for immigration include:
Family reunionViolent conflictsEnvironmental factorsEducational purposesEmployment opportunities.Learn more about the United States' current immigration policy at https://brainly.com/question/20544005
#SPJ1
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
Your friend, Caitlyn, does not think it is important to review her monthly credit card statement. Instead, she just
sets up an automatic minimum payment on the 18th of each month. Write a letter to Caitlyn convincing her that
this is a bad idea. Support your argument using examples from the above credit card statement.
Answer:
Wait until her account compromisedExplanation:
eventually she will mess up her credit and get cut offNothing thank you I made it myself
Answer:
hi manna how are come in comment section