a postal worker counts the number of complaint letters received by the united states postal service in a given day. identify the type of data collected.

The explicit formula for the given sequence is an = (n + 10 - phi^(n-1)) / (n + 6 + phi^(n-1)).

The sequence is defined by the formula, which involves the term "phi" raised to the power of (n-1), where n represents the position of the term in the sequence. The numerator of the formula consists of the term number incremented by 10 and subtracted by phi raised to the power of (n-1). The denominator consists of the term number incremented by 6 and added to phi raised to the power of (n-1). The formula calculates each term of the sequence based on its position, resulting in a sequence of values that follow the given pattern.

To know more about explicit formula, click here: brainly.com/question/25094536

#SPJ11

The correct answer is Probability and non probability sampling procedure.

There are two distinct exits from sampling procedures.

There are two types of sampling: probability sampling and non-probability sampling.

In probability sampling each population has equal and independent chance to comes in the study . There are various types of probability samplings technique exists . These are simple random sampling , stratified random sampling, cluster sampling , systematic random sampling etc.

In non probability sampling the samples are selected on the basis of personal biasness, judgments and preferences. Judgemental sampling , quota sampling, dimensional sampling etc comes under this type of sampling procedure.

So here the correct answer is

Option -E- Probability and non probability sampling procedure.

Except it all other options are wrong.

To learn more about Probability click here:

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

it's important to note that the sketch of the domain will be an infinite unbounded region, as there are no specific constraints on x, y, or z.

To describe and sketch the domain of the function f(x, y, z) =\(e^{(yz)} - x^2 - y^2\), we need to identify any restrictions or limitations on the variables x, y, and z.

1. Domain of x:

The variable x does not have any restrictions since it appears only in the expression \(x^2,\) which is defined for all real numbers. Therefore, the domain of x is (-∞, ∞).

2. Domain of y:

The variable y appears in the expressions \(y^2\) and \(e^{(yz)}\). The term \(y^2\) is defined for all real numbers, so it does not impose any restrictions. However, the term e^(yz) is only defined for all real numbers y and z since the exponential function is defined for all real inputs. Therefore, the domain of y is (-∞, ∞).

3. Domain of z:

The variable z appears only in the expression \(e^{(yz)}\). As mentioned earlier, the exponential function is defined for all real inputs. Therefore, the domain of z is also (-∞, ∞).

Combining the domains of x, y, and z, the overall domain of the function f(x, y, z) is (-∞, ∞) for all variables x, y, and z.

To sketch the domain, we can imagine a three-dimensional space with the x, y, and z axes extending infinitely in both positive and negative directions. The domain encompasses all points in this three-dimensional space.

To know more about function visit:

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Answer:

sales Tax = 4.8

total cost = 84.8

Step-by-step explanation:

80.00 * 6%​ = 80.00 * 0.06​ = 4.8

Answer:

Sales tax: 4.80 Total costs: 84.80

Step-by-step explanation:

Price x sales tax rate = sales tax

80 x .06(6%) = 4.80

price + sales tax = total costs

80 + 4.80 = 84.80

Answer:

8 cm and 9 cm by using a>b+c where a, b and c are sides of a triangle

In 5 possible schedules, John can play basketball on Wednesday or Friday or both.

There are two possible scenarios:

1) John plays basketball on Wednesday only or Friday only, but not both.
- If John plays basketball on Wednesday, he has 2 options left to play on Friday (either play or not play), so there are 2 possibilities.
- If John plays basketball on Friday, he has 2 options left to play on Wednesday, so there are 2 possibilities.
Therefore, there are a total of 2+2=4 possibilities for playing basketball on either Wednesday or Friday, but not both.

2) John plays basketball on both Wednesday and Friday.

In this case, there are only 1 possibility.
So, the total number of possible schedules to play basketball on Wednesday or Friday or both is 4+1=5.

Learn more about possibility curve : https://brainly.com/question/26460726

#SPJ11

In 5 possible schedules, John can play basketball on Wednesday or Friday or both.

There are two possible scenarios:

1) John plays basketball on Wednesday only or Friday only, but not both.
- If John plays basketball on Wednesday, he has 2 options left to play on Friday (either play or not play), so there are 2 possibilities.
- If John plays basketball on Friday, he has 2 options left to play on Wednesday, so there are 2 possibilities.
Therefore, there are a total of 2+2=4 possibilities for playing basketball on either Wednesday or Friday, but not both.

2) John plays basketball on both Wednesday and Friday.

In this case, there are only 1 possibility.
So, the total number of possible schedules to play basketball on Wednesday or Friday or both is 4+1=5.

Learn more about possibility curve : https://brainly.com/question/26460726

#SPJ11

Probability that a poorly constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P) = P(VI) * P(P | VI) =  0.5 * 0.05  = 0.025

(a) Let W be the event that a well-constructed building will be damaged during the earthquake.

Let VI, VII, VIII and IX be the event of occurrence of earthquake of intensity VI (or less), VII, VIII and IX respectively.

Then,

P(W | VI) = 0

P(W | VII) = 0.05

P(W | VIII) = 0.10

P(W | IX) = 0.20

P(VI) = 0.5,  P(VII) = 0.3, P(VIII) = 0.15, P(IX) = 0.05

By law of total probability,

Probability that a well-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(W)

= P(VI) * P(W | VI) + P(VII) * P(W | VIII) + P(VI) * P(W | VIII) + P(IX) * P(W | IX)

= 0.5 * 0 + 0.3 * 0.05 + 0.15 * 0.10 + 0.05 * 0.20

=  0.04

(b)

Let P be the event that a poorly constructed building will be damaged during the earthquake.

Then,

P(P | VI) = 0.05

P(P | VII) = 0.25

P(P | VIII) = 0.50

P(P| IX) = 0.75

P(VI) = 0.5,  P(VII) = 0.3, P(VIII) = 0.15, P(IX) = 0.05

By law of total probability,

Probability that a poorly-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P)

= P(VI) * P(P | VI) + P(VII) * P(P | VIII) + P(VI) * P(P | VIII) + P(IX) * P(P | IX)

= 0.5 * 0.05 + 0.3 * 0.25 + 0.15 * 0.50 + 0.05 * 0.75

=  0.2125

Let PC and WC be the event that the building is poorly constructed and well constructed respectively. Then,

P(PC) = 0.20

P(WC) = 1 - P(PC) = 1 - 0.20 = 0.80

Let D be the event that building is damaged by the earthquake.

Then, P(D | PC) = P(P) = 0.2125

P(D | WC) = P(W) = 0.04

By law of total probability, proportion of buildings damaged by the earthquake

P(D) = P(PC) * P(D | PC) + P(WC) * P(D | WC)

= 0.2 * 0.2125 + 0.8 * 0.04

= 0.0745

(c)

Given the building is damaged, the probability that it was poorly constructed = P(PC | D)

= P(D | PC) * P(PC) / P(D)                     (By Bayes theorem)

= 0.2125 * 0.2 / 0.0745

= 0.5704698

(d)

For intensity VI (or less),

Probability that a well-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(W)

= P(VI) * P(W | VI)  = 0.5 * 0 = 0

Probability that a poorly-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P)

= P(VI) * P(P | VI) =  0.5 * 0.05  = 0.025

Proportion of buildings damaged by the earthquake  = 0.20 * 0.025 + 0.80 * 0 = 0.005

For intensity VII,

Probability that a well-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(W)

= P(VII) * P(W | VII)  = 0.3 * 0.05 = 0.015

Probability that a poorly-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P)

= P(VII) * P(P | VII) =  0.3 * 0.25  = 0.075

Proportion of buildings damaged by the earthquake  = 0.20 * 0.075 + 0.80 * 0.015 = 0.027

For intensity VIII,

Probability that a well-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(W)

= P(VIII) * P(W | VIII)  = 0.15 * 0.10 = 0.015

Probability that a poorly-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P)

= P(VIII) * P(P | VIII) =  0.15 * 0.50 = 0.075

Proportion of buildings damaged by the earthquake  = 0.20 * 0.075 + 0.80 * 0.015 = 0.027

For intensity IX,

Probability that a well-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(W)

= P(IX) * P(W | IX)  = 0.05 * 0.20 = 0.01

Probability that a poorly-constructed building will be damaged by earthquake = P(P)

= P(IX) * P(P | IX) = 0.05 * 0.75 = 0.0375

Proportion of buildings damaged by the earthquake  = 0.20 * 0.01 + 0.80 * 0.0375 = 0.032

Thus, the intensity IX is the source of most losses.

to know more about probability click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

67

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the triangle is an isosceles triangle so the math would be (180-46)/2=67

Answer:

Pg. 1:

Triangle A: Obtuse

Triangle B: Obtuse

Triangle C: Acute

Triangle D: Right

Pg. 2:

Question 1:   Figure A

Question 2: None

Question 3: Figure C

Pg. 3:

Triangle A: Scalene

Triangle B: Equilateral

Triangle C: Isosceles

Triangle D: Isosceles

Pg. 4:

A: Triangle

B: Circle

C: Rectangle

Hope that helped!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

99

Answer:

(- 3, 1 )

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in point- slope form is

y - b = m(x - a)

where m is the slope and (a, b) a point on the line

y - 1 = 2(x + 3) ← is in point- slope form

with (a, b) = (- 3, 1 )

Thus, based on this equation, we can conclude that education and annual income are negatively associated with the number of professional sporting events attended per year,

An unstandardized regression equation based on a sample of 743 city residents, where Y is a 10-point scale measuring the number of professional sporting events attended per year.

X, is education, X₂ is annual income (divided by $10,000), and X3 is a dummy variable for gender (1= female, 0 = male). The r ratios appear in parentheses (-3.76) (-1.42) (2.14) (-2.87).

This equation can be used to identify and analyze the effect of education, annual income, and gender on the number of professional sporting events attended by city residents.

The coefficients show the strength of the relationship between each predictor variable and the dependent variable.The regression coefficient for education,

-3.76, suggests that a one-unit increase in education (in years) is expected to be associated with a decrease of 3.76 in the number of professional sporting events attended per year, holding other variables constant.

The coefficient for income, -1.42, suggests that a $10,000 increase in annual income is expected to be associated with a decrease of 1.42 in the number of professional sporting events attended per year, holding other variables constant.

The coefficient for the gender variable, 2.14, suggests that being female (compared to male) is expected to be associated with an increase of 2.14 in the number of professional sporting events attended per year, holding other variables constant.

The intercept term, -2.87, indicates the expected number of professional sporting events attended by a male with zero education, zero income, and th

e reference gender (male).whereas being female (compared to male) is positively associated with the number of professional sporting events attended per year.

To learn more about : equation

https://brainly.com/question/17145398

#SPJ8

Answer:

260

Step-by-step explanation:

65*2=130

130*2=260

Good luck!

The population of bacteria will be 260 after 950 hours.

It's time to double down on the time-doubling equation (pun intended).

If the number of bacteria in a colony doubles every 475 hours, that means the population increases by a factor of 2 every 475 hours. To find the population 950 hours from now, we need to determine how many times the population will double in 950 hours.

We can divide 950 by 475 to find out how many times the population will double in 950 hours:

950 / 475 = 2

So the population will double 2 times in 950 hours.

To find the final population, we can use the starting population of 65 bacteria and multiply it by 2 raised to the power of the number of times the population will double:

65 x 2² = 65 x 4 = 260

So the population of bacteria will be 260 after 950 hours.

To learn more about the Doubling time click here:

https://brainly.com/question/27314121

#SPJ2

Answer:1540

Step-by-step explanation: I hope this helps

Answer:

165 liters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Petrolyn motor oil is a combination or natural oil and synthetic oil.

It contains 3 liters of natural oil for every 2 liters of synthetic oil.

Question asked:

In order to make 275 liters of Petrolyn oil, how many liters of natural oil are needed?

Solution:

It is given that Petrolyn motor oil contains 3 liters of natural oil for every 2 liters of synthetic oil that means ratio of natural oil and synthetic oil is 3 : 2.

Now, in order to make 275 liters of Petrolyn oil, we will have to combine both natural and synthetic oil.

Let ratio be  

Then quantity of natural oil in liters =  

And quantity of synthetic oil in liters =  

To make  275 liters of Petrolyn oil,

Quantity of natural oil in liters +  quantity of synthetic oil in liters = 275

Dividing both sides by 5

=  liters

Therefore, 165 liters of natural oil are needed to make 275 liters of Petrolyn oil.

Answer:

\(t=k+\frac{e}{2}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(k=t-\frac{e}{2}\\t=k+\frac{e}{2}\)

The proof that is given in the question ""proof" by mathematical induction" is incorrect because the statement being proven is false. The statement "for any positive integer n, n is equal to 1 more than n" is not true for any positive integer n.

Mathematical induction is a method of proving a statement true for all positive integers. It involves two steps: (1) proving the statement is true for the smallest positive integer, and (2) assuming the statement is true for an arbitrary integer and proving that it must then be true for the next integer.

In a proof by mathematical induction, it is important to make sure that the statement being proven is actually true for the first few cases, before attempting to use induction to prove it for all positive integers. In this case, the statement is not true for any positive integers, so there is no point in attempting to prove it using induction.

The proof given in the question is invalid because the statement being proven is false. Mathematical induction is a powerful tool for proving statements, but it only works if the statement being proven is actually true.

To know mare about Mathematical induction refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1333684#

#SPJ11

There is 1 favorable outcome and 16 possible outcomes, we can calculate the probability of producing the genotype aabb as 1/16.

To calculate the probability of producing the genotype aabb from a cross between aabb and aabb, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes and the total number of possible outcomes. Determine the total number of possible outcomes: When crossing aabb with aabb, each parent contributes one allele for each gene, resulting in four possible alleles for each gene in the offspring. Since there are two genes (a and b), the total number of possible outcomes is 4^2 = 16.

Determine the number of favorable outcomes: To produce the genotype aabb, both parents must contribute the recessive alleles for both genes. Since each parent is homozygous for the recessive alleles (aabb), there is only one possible outcome for each gene, resulting in a total of 1*1 = 1 favorable outcome. Calculate the probability: The probability of producing the genotype aabb is the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes: P(aabb) = Number of favorable outcomes / Total number of possible outcomes

Since we have determined that there is 1 favorable outcome and 16 possible outcomes, we can calculate the probability of producing the genotype aabb as 1/16.

To learn more about probability click here:

brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The expected time for completion of Activity "X" on a PERT chart is 9 hours.

PERT analysis is a project management technique that is used to evaluate and analyze the tasks involved in finishing a project. It makes use of 3 duration estimates: optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely times to calculate the expected duration of each activity. These estimates are used to analyze the critical path, slack time, and schedule of the project.

Let's calculate the expected time for completion of Activity "X" on a PERT chart using the given estimates:

Optimistic time (O) = 6 hours

Most likely time (M) = 9 hours

Pessimistic time (P) = 12 hours

Expected time (TE) = [O + 4M + P] ÷ 6= [6 + 4(9) + 12] ÷ 6= [6 + 36 + 12] ÷ 6= 54 ÷ 6= 9

Know more about PERT here:

https://brainly.com/question/14919997

#SPJ11

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

g=4.33

Step-by-step explanation:

8.95 - 5.4g = 3.81 - 9.58 - 8.69

-5.4g = 3.81 -9.58 -8.69 - 8.95

-5.4g = 5.77 - 8.69 - 8.95

-5.4g = -14.46 - 8.95

-5.4g = 23.41

-5.4/-5.4 =23.41/-5.4

g=4.33

Answer is attached in the image I have made below.

A triangle with two congruent sides is called isosceles triangle. Therefore, this triangle has two equal angles.

Hope this helps ^-^

Step-by-step explanation:

m=\(\frac{2-(-8)}{0-4}\)=\(\frac{10}{-4}\)= -2.5

this may be right but I do not know

The table that shows no correlation is the third table, counting from the tom.

A table will show no correlation if we can't find any rule that relates the changes in oe of the variables with the changes in the other variable.

First table:

As x increases, y decreases until the point (6, -3), then increases to (8, -2), then it decreases and so on.

Second table.

Like the first one, but with more variation, it first decreases, then it increases until (10, 0), it decreases again to (14, -1), then it increases again.

Third table.

It increases steadily until the last point, where there is a sudden change.

Fourth table:

As x increases, y decreases steadly.

While in table 1 and 2 we can't see a prior any relation, we can see a semi periodic behavior in the increases-decreases, and there are no jumps in values of y.

For the third table the behavior is more random, and we can see two jumps in the y-values, on from -4 to 6 (10 units in total) and other from 10 to -16.

So this is the correct option.

Learn more about tables:

https://brainly.com/question/12151322

#SPJ1

The final answer is

Dnf(p0) = ((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2))) / sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

To find the direction of greatest increase of the function f=sin(xy) at point p0, we need to find the gradient vector of f at p0 and normalize it.
The gradient vector of f is given by:

∇f = (partial derivative of f with respect to x, partial derivative of f with respect to y)
∂f/∂x = y cos(xy)
∂f/∂y = x cos(xy)

Therefore,
∇f = (y cos(xy), x cos(xy))
At point p0, we have x = π−−√/3 and y = π−−√/2, so
∇f(p0) = ((π−−√/2) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)), (π−−√/3) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

To normalize this vector, we need to divide each component by its magnitude. The magnitude of ∇f(p0) is:
|∇f(p0)| = sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

So the unit vector in the direction of greatest increase of f at p0 is:
n = ∇f(p0) / |∇f(p0)|

Simplifying the expression for n, we get:
n = ((π−−√/2) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)), (π−−√/3) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2))) / sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

To compute the magnitude of the greatest rate of increase, we need to find the directional derivative of f in the direction of n at p0. The directional derivative of f in the direction of a unit vector u at point p is given by:
Duf(p) = ∇f(p) · u

where . denotes the dot product.

So the greatest rate of increase of f at p0 is:
Dnf(p0) = ∇f(p0) · n

Simplifying the expression for Dnf(p0), we get:
Dnf(p0) = ((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2))) / sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

Therefore, the direction n in which f increases most rapidly at point p0 is:
n = ((π−−√/2) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)), (π−−√/3) cos((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2))) / sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

Therefore, the final answer is:

And the magnitude of the greatest rate of increase of f at point p0 is:
Dnf(p0) = ((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2))) / sqrt((π−−√/2)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)) + (π−−√/3)^2 cos^2((π−−√/3)(π−−√/2)))

To learn more about functions, visit https://brainly.in/question/9181709

#SPJ11

The answer is 3 5/7 hope this helps

Enlarge the shape by scale factor 3.

To expand a form, multiply all of its lengths by the scaling factor. The scale factor indicates how much larger the shape will be. For example, increasing a form by a scale factor of two means that all of its sides will be twice as long. This rectangle measures one square broad by two squares long.

To employ a center of enlargement, we must draw lines from the center of enlargement to the original shape’s vertices. These are known as ray lines. E.g. Triangle ABC has been expanded by a scale factor of 2 around an expansion point O.

To learn more about Scale factor to refer:

https://brainly.com/question/22644306

#SPJ4

Answer:

a) \(\sf x = 1.1\)    b) \(\sf x = 1.5\)

solving steps:

a)

\(\sf 2.6 * x = 2.86\)

\(\sf x = \frac{2.86}{2.6}\)

\(\sf x = 1.1\)

b)

\(\sf x * 1.2 = 1.8\)

\(\sf x = \frac{1.8}{1.2}\)

\(\sf x = 1.5\)