A prosecutor shows a business sold cigarettes or alcohol to a minor. There is no mens rea requirement in the relevant criminal statute. This would be an example of criminal recklessness criminal negligence strict liability proof by a preponderance of the evidence proof by the greater weight of the evidence Kathleen is charged with embezzlement. Kathleen is more worried about being sued by her former clients. Which plea would allow her to not contest the criminal charge, but not admit guilt? Writ of habeas corpus Writ of certiorari Subpoena duces tecum Voluntary dismissal without prejudice Nolo contendere Billy was robbed at gunpoint in a parking lot by a man wearing a mask. As the robber ran off, Billy grabbed his own gun and shot him in the leg. When the police arrived,Billy was arrested along with the thief. When Billy complained about his arrest, the officer in charge told him that because the state police were involved, federal constitutional rights were waived. Billy is trying to obtain legal representation. Which of the following is true regarding Billy's right to counsel? Billy has a right to counsel. Billy has no right to counsel. Billy has a right to counsel, but only if he can establish that he has no previous criminal record. Billy has a right to counsel, but only because felony charges are likely involved. Sally tries to sell magazine subscriptions to Bob and Linda. Trish, Sally's boss, is taking the money for herself, and has absolutely no intention of ever arranging for . the provision of magazines. Trish is hoping Sally's youth and odd mannerisms will encourage people to give her money. Sally is unaware of Trish's plans. Which of the following offenses, if any, has Trish committed? False entry Defalcation False pretense A Ponzi scheme False token Target for requiring her to wear a mask while shopping there. Sare secides to sue Karen also doesn't trust judges, so she will demand a jury. Will an appellate court initially hear Karen's case deciding issues such as whether she has a claim and can act as a plaintiff? Yes, but only if Karen can prove that he would have had to wait at least a year for a trial at the trial court level No, but only because Karen did not have a lawyer Yes, so long as a state trial court judge approves and certifies the case for the appellate court without holding a trial first No, because Karen is required to first file the case in the appropriate trial court No, but only because Karen can avoid the requirement to wear a mask by

Answer:

President

Explanation:

Based on the information provided in this scenario, the best guess would be that John is the President of the country in question. This is because ANY individual that acts on behalf of the government and has been granted special or extraordinary power by the government has the ability to declare a national emergency. Yet the President of the country is usually known as the commander of the armed forces and holds the highest rank when making decisions on attacking another country. Therefore John designation would be as President of the country.

Answer:

you can modify it to your choice ..... hope it is helpful

Battery is an act that intentionally or recklessly causes harmful or offensive contact with another person.

The act of swinging the club behind the instructor was a show of annoyance and was not meant to make physical contact with the instructor. Unfortunately, the club slipped from the golfer's hands and hit the instructor in the head, causing injury. Even though it was an accident, it is still considered a battery because it was an intentional act. Therefore, the instructor will most likely recover if he brings a battery action against the golfer.

The golfer may argue that it was an accident, but the court may still hold her liable for the instructor's injuries since the act of swinging the club behind the instructor was intentional and reckless.

To know more about Battery visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19225854

#SPJ11

Answer:

Juvenile delinquency data suggests that most troubled kids either where raised by a grandmother, aunt or other family members tend to act out on the account that they don't have a stable punishment system or they are mentally unstable. Often times troubled kids also do not do well in school, or on the contrary they are extremely intelligent.

Explanation:

Answer:

the use of Title 42 United States Code Section 1983 as a legal remedy for inmates.

Explanation:

Cooper v. Pate was a significant prison case because it was the first time that the Supreme Court recognized that prisoners have the right to sue for violations of their constitutional rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1871. The case was brought by an inmate in an Illinois state prison who claimed that prison officials were violating his First Amendment rights by prohibiting him from practicing his religion. The Supreme Court held that the inmate's claims were valid and that prisoners could sue under the Civil Rights Act for violations of their constitutional rights. This decision opened the door for many other prison cases in the years to come and established an important precedent for protecting the rights of prisoners.

Answer:

The transfer of risk is an essential tenant of insurance contracts. When you purchase an insurance policy, the insurance company will agree to indemnify you for a certain amount of loss in exchange for your payment of a set premium

Answer:

Explanation:

Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,

Answer:

yea

Explanation:

:[ i have no idea i'm in 5th grade so i'm guessing.

Answer:

fourth ammendment protects citizens from that

The amendment that protects citizens from having their private property taken by the government is the Fourth Amendment. Thus, option (a) is correct.

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which is a component of the Bill of Rights, forbids arbitrary searches and seizures. It establishes standards for the issuance of warrants, which must be authorized by a judge or magistrate, supported by oath or affirmation, and supported by probable cause.

The Fourth Amendment safeguards citizens against illegal government searches and seizures, but only those that fall under the legal definition of being unreasonable are covered.

Learn more about on amendment, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13276616

#SPJ2

The statement "Rote learning has at its core Hartley's law of repetition" is TRUE. Rote learning is the memorization of information based on repetition without necessarily understanding the meaning or significance of what is being learned.

Memorizing multiplication tables by reciting them repeatedly is an example of rote learning. According to Hartley's law of repetition, the more frequently a stimulus is repeated, the stronger it becomes.

As a result, repetition aids in the establishment of long-term memory. The more we repeat something, the more likely we are to remember it later.

Know more about Rote learning:

https://brainly.com/question/1503472

#SPJ11

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

Answer:

I think by helping them in what they love most

being there for them always as ur mom thus

The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 requires employers to provide benefits to employees who are injured or killed on the job.

The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 was enacted to compensate workers who were injured in the course of their employment due to an accident. It applies to all employees, including those who work part-time, temporarily, or casually. 

This act assures that laborers' rights are protected even if they suffer disability or death as a result of an accident at work. The Act also includes provisions for medical and other benefits, such as reimbursement of medical expenses, provision of artificial limbs, and payment of a gratuity.

Therefore, the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923 is mentioned above.

To learn more on Employees Compensation Act, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30269394

#SPJ1  

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of a country's economic output. However, not all goods and services are included in GDP. There are various categories of goods and services that are not counted in GDP. In general, these categories of goods and services are not included in GDP as they do not represent economic production and exchange.

For example, transfer payments such as welfare payments, Social Security benefits, and other entitlements are not counted in GDP as they do not represent economic production and exchange. Also, intermediate goods such as raw materials used in production, do not count in GDP as they are not final goods that are sold directly to the consumer.

Furthermore, secondhand goods that are resold, do not count in GDP as they do not represent the production of new goods or services.Finally, non-market goods such as those that are produced and consumed at home, like home-cooked meals or cleaning services, are not included in GDP.

To know more about GDP visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30285994

#SPJ11

A putative marriage is an apparently valid marriage performed in good faith on the part of at least one of the spouses but is legally invalid due to a technical impediment, such as a pre-existing marriage of one party.

The term "putative marriage", as used in this article, means an authentic marriage by a person claiming to be a hypothetical spouse, null and void by reason of impediment. this person did not know but still existed at that time. of trying to get married.

A putative marriage can be a hypothetical marriage. Presumptive marriage has some consequences for civil marriage. For the nullity of marriage hypothesis, one or both parties must let go of what made their marriage null and void.

Learn more about putative marriage here: https://brainly.com/question/9275150

#SPJ9

Jack is on trial for first-degree murder and has pled not guilty. At this stage in the jury trial, the prosecutor is presenting her case against Jack by questioning her own witnesses. This questioning is known as direct examination.

During direct examination, the prosecutor asks questions of her own witnesses to elicit testimony that supports the prosecution's case and proves the elements of the crime charged against the defendant. The defense is given an opportunity to cross-examine each witness after the prosecutor has finished questioning them.

The stage in a jury trial where the prosecutor presents her case against the defendant by questioning her own witnesses is called the "prosecution's case-in-chief." During this stage, the prosecutor presents evidence, such as testimony from witnesses, to support the charges against the defendant. The prosecutor may also introduce physical evidence, such as photographs, documents, or other objects that are relevant to the case.

To know more about direct examination go to

brainly.com/question/4710125

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

hope this helps! ＼(⌒▽⌒)

can i have brainliest???

The purpose for which character evidence is offered will determine whether or not it is admissible during a trial.

It is not admissible to use evidence of a person's character or personality traits to demonstrate that they behaved in a particular way on a given occasion. The "propensity" rule which goes by this name, is meant to stop unjustified bias against the defendant. For instance it would typically be improper to introduce evidence that a defendant has a history of violence in order to establish that they committed a particular act of violence.

The propensity rule does have a few exceptions, though. For instance, if a defendant's character or trait of character is offered to prove another relevant fact, like motivation, intent or the lack of error then it may be admissible.  It may be possible to prove that the victim was the aggressor in a physical altercation in some circumstances by introducing evidence of the victim's character.

Learn more about character evidence at:

brainly.com/question/31845492

#SPJ4

The Federal regulation of the Lobbying Act of 1946 is a statute enacted by using the US Congress to reduce the effect on lobbyists. The primary cause of the Act become to provide information to individuals of Congress approximately those who foyer them. The 1946 Act turned into changed by way of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.

Each of the 50 states regulates lobbying, with its very own set of definitions and legal guidelines. The federal authorities have also imposed a few policies on lobbying, most currently via the sincere management and Open Government Act of 2007.

Even as lobbying is a problem to giant and often complex policies which, if no longer followed, can lead to consequences such as prison, the hobby of lobbying has been interpreted with the aid of court docket rulings as constitutionally protected loose speech and a way to petition the authorities for the redress of grievances, two of the freedoms.

Learn more about Lobbying here

https://brainly.com/question/19371103

#SPJ4

The law that introduced a corporate offense for the failure to prevent bribery is the UK Bribery Act of 2010.

This law was implemented to combat bribery and corruption in business transactions and established four key offenses, one of which is the corporate offense of failure to prevent bribery.

This offense holds companies responsible for any bribery committed by their employees or agents unless the company can prove that it had adequate measures in place to prevent such behavior.

The penalty for this offense can result in an unlimited fine, making it a significant legal risk for companies that operate in the UK. Overall, the UK Bribery Act of 2010 serves as a vital tool for promoting ethical business practices and accountability in the corporate world.

Know more about the UK Bribery Act of 2010 here:

https://brainly.com/question/31255215

#SPJ11

The minimum age for anyone to be on the premises of a Class A or Class G (bar) permit at any time is 21 years.

In many countries, the legal drinking age is 21, and this age restriction applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, commonly referred to as bars.

The legal drinking age varies by country, and in some cases, even within different regions of a country. However, for the purpose of this explanation, I will provide information based on the legal drinking age in the United States, as it is one of the most well-known examples.

In the United States, the legal drinking age is 21 years old. This means that individuals must be at least 21 years old to purchase, possess, or consume alcoholic beverages. Additionally, this age restriction also applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, which are typically bars or establishments where alcohol is served.

Class A permits are typically issued to establishments that primarily serve alcoholic beverages, while Class G permits are issued to businesses that serve alcohol, but it is not their primary focus. Regardless of the class of the permit, the minimum age requirement remains the same.

It is important to note that the legal drinking age and age restrictions for entering bars or establishments serving alcohol may vary in different countries or regions. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult the specific laws and regulations of the particular jurisdiction in question to obtain accurate and up-to-date information on age restrictions for entering bar premises.


To learn more about permit click here: brainly.com/question/32091205

#SPJ11

If the president does not sign the bill and holds it for more than 10 days (excluding Sundays), the bill becomes law without the president's signature.

If the president holds the bill for more than ten days while Congress is in session and does not sign it, the bill automatically becomes law without the president's signature.

If Congress adjourns during the ten-day period, and the president does not sign the bill, it does not become law, and this is also considered a pocket veto. In this case, the bill would have to be reintroduced in the next session of Congress, and the legislative process would start over again.

Find out more on pocket vetos at https://brainly.com/question/31318139

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Russian one :))

[it's my opinion only]

Answer:

Court take many years to solve a problem

Of every case

State laws that preempt HIPAA privacy provisions usually cover the following types of information, except for cardiac.

When new federal laws were approved in 1996, there were no clear HIPAA exceptions for emergency cases. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a bulletin in 2014 to make clear how protected health information (PHI) might be utilized in emergency scenarios without breaking the law in response to public health emergencies across the world. Except for therapeutic reasons, the amount of information disclosed must always be "minimum required," and all reasonable steps must be taken to prevent unauthorised use of the patient's information.

Hospitals are exempt from the sanctions and fines usually associated with HIPAA violations, such as using PHI to speak with a patient's family member without authorization, provide a patient with a copy of the entity's privacy notice, or safeguard the patient's complete privacy or confidentiality, for a brief but defined period in the event of a declared public health emergency.

To learn more about HIPAA here,

https://brainly.com/question/11277705

#SPJ1