A purchaser of a $100,000 single-family home for her family refuses to close escrow after making a $10,000 deposit she is entitled to

Based on the case law presented in the unit lessons, the statement that BEST represents students' rights in schools is option C: Students' free speech rights are broad, but they have fewer Fourth Amendment rights.

The case law has established that students do possess free speech rights, which are protected under the First Amendment. However, these rights can be limited by school administrators if they can demonstrate a reasonable justification that the speech would cause a material disruption to the school environment. On the other hand, students have fewer Fourth Amendment rights concerning search and seizure in schools. Courts have recognized that schools have a responsibility to maintain a safe and orderly environment, allowing administrators greater leeway to conduct searches and seizures if there is reasonable suspicion.

Learn more about Fourth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/7955252

#SPJ11

Answer:

Rule of law means that no one is

above the law and that the law

applies equally to everyone.

Explanation:

Everyone has to follow the law even if they don't want to They have laws sent in place for a reason.

Answer:

cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.

pros: no prison

Explanation:

Answer:

thx :)

Explanation:

ayoooooooo i'm bored lma.o.

Developing countries have the potential to achieve certain advantages and disadvantages by positioning themselves as tax havens.

However, it's important to note that the advantages and disadvantages can vary depending on the specific circumstances and policies of each country. Here are some general advantages and disadvantages:

Advantages of being a tax haven for a developing country:

Attracting foreign investment: By offering low or zero tax rates, developing countries can attract foreign businesses and investors, stimulating economic growth and job creation.

Generating revenue: Although tax rates are low, tax havens can generate significant revenue by attracting a large volume of international transactions, financial activities, and investments.

Economic diversification: Becoming a tax haven can provide an opportunity for developing countries to diversify their economies beyond traditional industries, such as agriculture or manufacturing, by focusing on financial services and international business.

Disadvantages of being a tax haven for a developing country:

Risk of capital flight: Developing countries that rely heavily on tax haven status may experience capital flight if tax regulations change or global sentiment shifts, leading to potential economic instability.

Negative impact on domestic tax revenue: Low tax rates for multinational corporations and wealthy individuals can reduce domestic tax revenue, hindering the government's ability to fund essential public services and infrastructure.

Reputation and transparency issues: Being labeled as a tax haven can damage a country's reputation and create concerns about transparency and financial integrity, which may discourage foreign investment or lead to increased scrutiny from international regulatory bodies.

It's important to note that the advantages and disadvantages of being a tax haven can vary depending on factors such as the country's overall economic stability, regulatory frameworks, and the balance between attracting international investment and maintaining domestic tax revenue.

Learn more about public services

https://brainly.com/question/14452199

#SPJ11

Based on the latest information from IRS on Health Savings Account (HSA), the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."

The IRS made the latest information for 2021 by stating that individuals aged 55 and below without family coverage under qualifying high-deductible health plans not less than $1,400 can contribute up to $3,600.

Therefore, given that Jack is not specified to have family coverage, it is assumed he is operating individual HSA. Also, since he is 45 years old, therefore, the maximum permitted HSA contribution in 2021 for Jack in his situation is "$3,600."

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "$3,600."

Learn more about Health Savings Account here: https://brainly.com/question/3626279

Answer:

Under the new policy, police can’t quietly upload a fake profile to a genealogy website, as some have done in hopes of finding a suspect’s distant relatives, without first identifying themselves.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In the eight years since Chief Justice Roberts joined the court, it has allowed corporations to spend freely in elections in the Citizens United case, has shielded them from class actions and human rights suits, and has made arbitration the favored way to resolve many disputes.

Answer & Explanation:

Case 1: No. The child's blood type is O, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and O. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 2: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents.

Case 3: No. The child's blood type is B, which cannot be produced from the combination of two B parents. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 4: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of O and O blood types from the parents.

Case 5: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and A blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A or AB.

Case 6: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of O and O blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A, B, or AB.

Case 7: Yes. The child's blood type is A, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents. The genetic make-up for the child in question would be AO, which can be produced from the combination of AB and B blood types from the parents.

The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits "double jeopardy" or being prosecuted twice for the same crime. However, there are exceptions to this rule.

What is the double jeopardy rule?

The double jeopardy clause, which is a clause in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, protects citizens from being tried twice for the same crime. It forbids the government from prosecuting an individual twice for the same offense after they have been acquitted or convicted of that crime. The double jeopardy clause protects people from being subjected to the mental, emotional, and financial burden of repeated prosecutions, as well as the possible risk of being convicted twice for the same offense. Furthermore, if a person has already served their sentence, they should not be tried again for the same crime, according to the double jeopardy clause. This implies that individuals who have been acquitted of charges or have completed their sentence cannot be retried for the same crime.

The exceptions to the double jeopardy rule: There are, however, certain exceptions to the double jeopardy rule. The exceptions to the double jeopardy rule are as follows:

Mistrials: If a trial is ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury, a procedural mistake, or other factors, a defendant may be retried. Because the original trial did not result in a final judgment, it is not considered to have been concluded. Therefore, if the case is retried, the defendant is not being tried again for the same crime, and the double jeopardy clause does not apply.

Civil and criminal prosecutions: An individual can be prosecuted in a criminal court and sued in a civil court for the same act. Because they are two distinct proceedings with different legal standards, civil and criminal prosecutions are not considered the same offense. Separate sovereignty: If a person violates both federal and state laws, they can be tried twice for the same act. Because the United States is a collection of states, each with its own sovereignty, they can prosecute individuals for crimes committed within their borders, even if the person has already been tried for the same crime in a federal court or another state.

Double jeopardy may have unintended consequences. Some people who have been acquitted of a crime may believe that they have "gotten away with it" and will re-offend. Furthermore, some offenders may agree to plead guilty in exchange for reduced sentences, but they may later be retried if new evidence arises.

Read more about Constitution at https://brainly.com/question/27962072

#SPJ11

Hearsay is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.

Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Generally, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court because it is considered unreliable and lacks the safeguards that come with live testimony and cross-examination.

One reason why hearsay is impermissible is that it deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the original statement. Cross-examination is a critical part of the legal process as it allows the opposing counsel to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony. When hearsay evidence is presented, however, the opposing counsel cannot question the original speaker about the circumstances under which the statement was made or any other relevant information that may impact its reliability.

There are some exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized hearsay exception or when it is used for a non-hearsay purpose, but generally speaking, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.

learn more about Hearsay here

https://brainly.com/question/31668354

#SPJ11

Answer: Heyaa! ~

Here is how a bill becomes a law!

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps you! ~

Answer:

Here is how a bill becomes a law

Explanation:

Step 1: The bill is drafted

Step 2: The bill is introduced.

Step 3: The bill goes to committee.

Step 4: Subcommittee review of the bill.

Step 5: Committee mark up of the bill.

Step 6: Voting by the full chamber on the bill.

Step 7: Referral of the bill to the other chamber.

Step 8: The bill goes to the president.

Step 9: Overriding a veto

Step 10: NOW A LAW!

The correct option is a. Copyright infringement occurs when someone uses a copyrighted work without the permission of the copyright owner.

In this case, Kay and Leo are using MP3 music files without the permission of Natural Recording Company, which owns the copyrights to those songs. This is a violation of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner, and can result in legal liability for the infringers.

Fair use is a legal defense that allows certain limited uses of copyrighted works without the permission of the copyright owner. It is a complex and fact-specific doctrine that is applied on a case-by-case basis, and does not apply in this situation. Licensing is the process of obtaining permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright owner. While it is possible that Natural Recording Company may offer licenses for the use of its songs, this is not relevant to the question of whether Kay and Leo's copying of the songs without permission is a violation of copyright law.

Learn more about  Copyright infringement

https://brainly.com/question/16774161

#SPJ4

Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.

(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.

(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.

(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.

Answer:

$30,000 - $6,000 = $24,000

$24,000 to finance at 4.71% for 60 months

24,000 divided by 60 = $400/month + 4.71% ( $18.84) = $418.84/month.

Explanation:

The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal administrative agency tasked with monitoring markets, enforcing securities laws, and developing new regulations.

There have been no legal violations by the SEC. Joe must be a US citizen or a foreigner with a valid visa in order to see a study from the Security Exchange Commission that discusses the implications of derivative financial products and their possible effects on the US stock market. Joe, a French national, asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for a copy of a report that discussed the implications of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market. Joe has no investment accounts of any kind and does not hold any derivative financial instruments. Due to this and the fact that Joe is not a US citizen, the SEC rejects his request. However, the SEC hasn't broken the law in any way. Any US citizen or foreign national with a valid visa is allowed to request a copy of any current reports from the SEC, according the law. Joe, however, is unable to view the SEC's study on the impact of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market since he is not a US citizen.

To know more about Security Exchange Commission (SEC):

https://brainly.com/question/9089676

#SPJ11

The major effect of the U.S. dollar becoming a substitute for gold in

international currency markets is because of the growing demand for U.S. dollars led the country to abandon the

gold standard.

The decision came about by a delegation from 44 Allied countries called the Bretton Woods Agreement.

The gold standard is known as a monetary system where a country's currency or paper money has a value when connected to gold.

The U.S. had to allow foreign governments to exchange dollars for gold until 1971, when President Richard Nixon ended the practice to stop foreigners from pipping U.S. gold reserves.

Learn more from

https://brainly.com/question/21900958

Answer:

Growing demand for U.S. dollars led the country to abandon the gold standard.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hi there! Answer is below :)

Explanation:

Habeas corpus was a law that was first introduced in Europe, to be more specific, Spain and Britain. This law gives an arrested person mandatory to appear before a judge and jury. It also requires the prosecutors to have evidence to make their point to jury.

The main components of fiscal policy are government spending and taxation.

Fiscal policy refers to the use of government revenue collection (taxation) and expenditure (spending) to influence the economy. It is a crucial tool for governments to stabilize the economy, promote growth, and manage public finances.

Government spending is one of the main components of fiscal policy. It involves the allocation of funds by the government for various purposes, such as infrastructure development, education, healthcare, defense, and social welfare programs.

By increasing government spending, the government can stimulate economic activity and create jobs, which can boost aggregate demand and spur economic growth. Conversely, reducing government spending can help control inflation and reduce budget deficits.

Taxation is another significant component of fiscal policy. It refers to the collection of revenue by the government through taxes imposed on individuals, businesses, and other entities. Taxation can be used to influence economic behavior and redistribute income.

For example, reducing tax rates can incentivize spending and investment, leading to economic expansion. On the other hand, increasing taxes can reduce disposable income, curb consumption, and manage inflation.

By adjusting government spending and taxation, fiscal policy aims to achieve macroeconomic objectives such as economic stability, sustainable growth, full employment, price stability, and income distribution. It is an essential tool for governments to manage the overall health and performance of the economy.

learn more about macroeconomic here:

https://brainly.com/question/28489802

#SPJ11

Answer:

it is said to be an Abelian group

Explanation:

John Locke believed that humans' natural rights included several fundamental freedoms, including the right to life, liberty, and property.

Here are some additional points for further clarification:

However, he did not include the right to equality among these natural rights.

Learn More About Humans natural

https://brainly.com/question/24064575

#SPJ11

Out of the given choices, it may be stated that the state governments are much similar to that of the federal governments for the fact that they also have a judiciary body including courts for upholding laws. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The state governments may generally be specified as the governments that operate and control only within the scope of their respective state, and do not usually have a say in the matters related to the other states. In the US, each state has its own government, which includes judiciary bodies for maintaining the laws within the state.

Learn more about governments here:

https://brainly.com/question/2397819

#SPJ4

Complete question

State governments are like the federal government in that they ______.

A. Have a judiciary with courts to uphold laws

B. The right to due process of law is guaranteed by the fifth amendment

Under Tennessee law, it is illegal to engage in discriminatory housing practices. Specifically, the Tennessee Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or familial status in the sale, rental, or financing of housing.

If a person or entity is found to have committed a first offense of discriminatory housing practice under Tennessee law, they may be subject to a fine. However, the amount of the fine can vary depending on the circumstances and severity of the violation.

Tennessee law provides for two types of fines for violations of the Human Rights Act: civil penalties and actual damages. Civil penalties are assessed by the state and are designed to punish the violator and deter future violations. Actual damages are awarded to the victim of the discrimination and are meant to compensate them for any harm they suffered as a result of the violation.

The maximum civil penalty that can be assessed for a first offense of discriminatory housing practice under Tennessee law is $10,000. However, the actual amount of the fine may be less than this, depending on the circumstances of the case. Additionally, the violator may be required to pay actual damages to the victim of the discrimination, which could be substantial.

In addition to fines, violators of Tennessee's anti-discrimination laws may be subject to other remedies, such as injunctive relief or orders requiring them to take steps to prevent future discrimination. Repeat offenders may face higher fines and other more severe penalties.

learn more about Tennessee law here

https://brainly.com/question/32226937

#SPJ11

Answer:

We're waiting every night to finally roam and invite

Newcomers to play with us

For many years we've been all alone

We're forced to be still

And play the same songs we've known since that day

An imposter took our life away

Now we're stuck here to decay

Please let us get in

Don't lock us away

We're not like what you're thinking

We are poor little souls

Who have lost all control

And we're forced here to take that role

We've been all alone

Stuck in our little zone since 1987

Join us, be our friend

Or just be stuck and defend

After all you only got

Five Nights at Freddy's

Is this where you wanna be?

I just don't get it

Why do you want to stay?

Five Nights at Freddy's

Is this where you wanna be?

I just don't get it

Why do you want to stay?

Five Nights at Freddy's

We're really quite surprised

That we get to see you another night

You should have looked for another job

You should have said to this place good-bye

It's like there's so much more

Maybe you've been in this place before

We remember a face like yours

You seem acquainted with those doors

Please let us get in

Don't lock us away

We're not like what you're thinking

We are poor little souls

Who have lost all control

And we're forced here to take that role

We've been all alone

Stuck in our little zone since 1987

Join us, be our friend

Or just be stuck and defend

After all you only got

Five Nights at Freddy's

Is this where you wanna be?

I just don't get it

Why do you want to stay?

Five Nights at Freddy's

Is this where you wanna be?

I just don't get it

Why do you want to stay?

Five Nights at Freddy's

Answer:

true; women are very frequently sexually assaulted by men and because of the patriarchal system, their assualts rarely get attention. if society treated both men and women fairly male violence against women would go down.

Answer:

I would think that only if they are pointing the guns at the officers or other individuals.

Explanation:

I found this on the internet though.  Hope it helps some.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/can-police-use-lethal-force-fleeing-suspect

Can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?

Only in very narrow circumstances. A seminal 1985 Supreme Court case, Tennessee vs. Garner, held that the police may not shoot at a fleeing person unless the officer reasonably believes that the individual poses a significant physical danger to the officer or others in the community. That means officers are expected to take other, less-deadly action during a foot or car pursuit unless the person being chased is seen as an immediate safety risk.

In other words, a police officer who fires at a fleeing man who a moment earlier murdered a convenience store clerk may have reasonable grounds to argue that the shooting was justified. But if that same robber never fired his own weapon, the officer would likely have a much harder argument.

“You don’t shoot fleeing felons. You apprehend them unless there are exigent circumstances — emergencies — that require urgent police action to safeguard the community as a whole,” said Greg Gilbertson, a police practices expert and criminal justice professor at Centralia College in Washington state.

State legislatures typically pass a relatively small percentage of the bills that are introduced. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in most states, only about 20-30% of introduced bills ultimately become law.

This is due to a variety of factors, including the sheer number of bills introduced each legislative session, limited time and resources for legislators to review and debate each bill, and political and ideological differences among legislators.

Additionally, some bills may be introduced as a symbolic gesture or to bring attention to a particular issue, with little expectation that they will actually become law. As a result, the legislative process can be a challenging and competitive one, with many bills ultimately falling by the wayside.

However, for bills that do successfully navigate the legislative process, they can have a significant impact on public policy and shape the direction of a state for years to come.

To know more about State legislatures visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3749822

#SPJ11

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.

The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.

It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.

The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.

To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:

https://brainly.com/question/27878011

#SPJ4

Correct question:

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.

a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population

b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population

c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population

d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population

2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.

a) 100

b) 20

c) 10

d) 50

Answer: B. Compassion.