A square on a coordinate plane is translated 9 units down and 1 unit to the right. which function rule describes the translation? t1, â€"9(x, y) tâ€"1, â€"9(x, y) tâ€"9, 1(x, y) tâ€"9, â€"1(x, y)

Answer: 1 11/12 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Since visitors spend 1/3 of their time waiting in line for rides and the Santos family spends 5¾hours at the park.

The tune spent waiting in line will be calculated by multiplying ⅓ by 5¾. This will be:

= ⅓ × 5¾

= ⅓ × 23/4

= 23/12

= 1 11/12 hours

Therefore, they'll wait in the park for 1 11/12 hours

Option C: 0.8889 is the probability of choosing an orange marble and a green marble.

So there are in total 10 marbles.

Two marbles can be chosen in \(^{10}C_2\) ways = 90/8

Now the favorable event is when one green marble and one orange marble  is chosen. The number of ways this can be done is \(^{2}C_1 \times ^{2}C_1 = 4\)

The resultant probability is calculated by:

\(P(E) = \dfrac{Number \:of\: Favourable \:cases}{ Number\: of\: total \:cases}\\= \dfrac{4}{\frac{90}{2}}\\\\= \dfrac{8}{90}\\\\\approx 0.08889\)

Thus the needed probability is 0.08889 given by option C.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/13038567

The types of function that best models the number of books in Jamal's library as a function of time is A. increasing linear.

A mathematical equation is the statement that illustrates that the variables given. In this case, two or more components are taken into consideration to describe the scenario.

In this case, it's important to note that this is a linear equation. Also, every month Jamal adds two new books to his library. This implies that it's increasing.

In conclusion, the correct option is A.

Learn more about equations on:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

Complete question

Every month Jamal adds two new books to his library. Which of the following types of functions

best models the number of books in Jamal's library as a function of time?

Increasing linear

Decreasing linear

Increasing exponential

Decreasing exponential

The measure of length PQ will be 22 units.

A triangle's third side is stated to be parallel to the line segment uniting its two midpoints, and it is also half as long as the third side.

Given:

PQ = 5x + 62, and MN = 6x-4

Now, using Mid- Point Theorem

PQ= 1/2 MN

-5x+ 62 = 1/2( 6x - 4)

-5x+ 62 = 3x - 2

-5x- 3x = -2 - 62

-8x = -64

x= 8

PQ= 5x+ 62 = -5(8) + 62 = -40 + 62 = 22

Hence, the measure of PQ is 22 units.

The missing image is attached below.

Learn more about the midpoint theorem here:

brainly.com/question/13677972

#SPJ1

The equation of the least-squares regression include the following: B. Volume = -0.013 +0.262 (Time³).

In Mathematics and Statistics, a least-squares regression line is a standard technique in regression analysis and statistics that is typically used for making the vertical distance obtained from the data points running to a regression line become very minimal or as small as possible.

Generally speaking, an equation to predict y from x is typically generated or created by using a regression line. Also, ln(cm³), ln (Seconds) is a transformation that linearizes a data set for volume and time.

Based on the regression analysis from the computer output, an equation of the least-squares regression is given by:

Volume = -0.013 +0.262 (Time³).

Read more on transformation and regression here: https://brainly.com/question/31844033

#SPJ1

Answer: the answer is in the screenshot so i hope that helps!

Answer:

465

Step-by-step explanation:

I just did it

Answer:

8 days

Step-by-step explanation:

20,000-10,000=10,000

10,000/1,250= 8

so it would take 8 days

Answer:

so first 9\1*9/3

the solution is put 9 multiple by 3 so you will get the answer of 27 or the cube of 3

9*3=27 or 3³

A function for the area A of the enclosure in terms of w is A = W(750 - 2W).

The width w that would maximize the area is 187.5 feet.

The maximum area is equal to 70,312.5 square feet.

Mathematically, the perimeter of a rectangular shape can be calculated by using this mathematical expression;

P = 2(L + W) or P = 2L + 2W

Where:

From the information about the fencing (perimeter), we have:

P = L + 2W

750 = L + 2W

Making L the subject, we have:

L = 750 - 2W

Mathematically, the area of a rectangle can be calculated by using this formula:

A = LW

A = W(750 - 2W).

A = 750W - 2W².

For the width that would maximize the area, we have:

Width, W = 750/4

Width, W = 187.5 feet.

L = 750 - 2W = 750 - 2(187.5) = 375 feet.

Maximum area = LW

Maximum area = 375 × 187.5

Maximum area = 70,312.5 square feet.

Read more on perimeter of a rectangle here: brainly.com/question/17360327

#SPJ1

Answer:

(A) The unshaded octagon is a reflection because it is a flip over a diagonal line.

Step-by-step explanation: Trust, rust, and pixie dust

Answer:

A is correct

The unshaded octagon is a reflection because it is a flip over a diagonal line.

i took the test

Answer:

Negative Correlation

Strong Correlation

Linear

Step-by-step explanation:

The points slope downward, and downward slopes = negative

This is a strong correlation because the points are in a distinct line, not scattered.

This is Linear because it is a straight line.

-Good luck on the exam!

Answer:

square

Step-by-step explanation:

unit ;)

Answer:

4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

you go to the right 4 times then up 7

Answer:

The answer is B the average tax rate

Answer:

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of the third side of the triangle ABC:

AB^2 = AC^2 + BC^2

(29)½^2 = 5^2 + 2^2

29 = 25 + 4

29 = 29

So the triangle is a right triangle with angle A being the angle opposite the side AC. Therefore, we can use the tangent function to find tan A:

tan A = opposite/adjacent = AC/BC = 5/2

So the exact value of tan A is 5/2.

The environmentalist measured the angle between points A and C as 40° after walking downstream 100 feet.

To measure the width of the river, the environmentalist used the method of measuring angles. She walked downstream from point A for a distance of 100 feet. At this new point, called point C, she measured the angle between points A and C and found it to be 40°.

The angle measurement is crucial in determining the width of the river using trigonometry. By utilizing the trigonometric concept of tangent, the environmentalist can calculate the width of the river. However, without further information or additional measurements, it is not possible to provide an exact calculation of the river's width.

To learn more about environmentalist click here:

brainly.com/question/1637487

#SPJ11

Answer:

y= -3 I think but the next person will answer this for you

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Hint :

Slope of horizontal lines is

zero (( 0 )) .

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Thus ;

\(slope = 0\)

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

The probability that the person selected will be someone whose response is never and who is a woman is 0.0636 = 6.36%.

A probability of an occurrence in the context of a problem is calculated by dividing the desired outcomes in the problem by the entire number of outcomes in the problem.

In the context of this problem, these outcomes are given as follows:

Desired outcomes: people whose response is never and who are women.

Total outcomes: all participants.

Hence, as all participants represent the desired outcomes, the probability that the person selected will be someone whose response is never and who is a woman is the relative frequency of people who are women and who respond never, which is: 0.0636 = 6.36%.

Missing question:

(Refer to the image for the complete question)

One person surveyed will be selected at random:

What is the probability that the person selected will be someone whose response is never and who is a woman?

What is the probability that the person selected will be someone whose response is never 0r who is a woman?

What is the probability that the person selected will be someone whose response is never given and that the person is a woman?

For the people surveyed are the events of being a person whose response is never and being woman independent?

To learn more about probability visit:brainly.com/question/29007463

#SPJ4

Last week Bob was paid total of $480 for the items that he produced that week and this week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.

Let's start with the simplest case:

he produced 36 or less items this week.

In this case he produced less than 36 items last week too.

So he was paid the same amount of dollar per item. Using assumptions (1) and (2), we have:

$480 + 2X = $510

⇒2X=510-480$

⇒2X=$30

⇒2X=$30/2

⇒X=$15

He was paid $15 per item.

Last week he received his $480.

480/15= 32 items.

This week he received his $510.

510/15=34 items. Other cases have no solution.

seems your question is incomplete., but most probably the complete question was

If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid X dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid X dollars per item for the first 36 items and 3/2 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?(1) Last week Bob was paid total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.

learn more about total earning: https://brainly.com/question/20818395

#SPJ4

The mathematical model that best fits the given data is option : y = 82.3 - 8.275x.

To construct a scatterplot and determine the mathematical model that best fits the given data, we will plot the points and analyze the trend.

Given Data:

x: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20

y: 40, 20, -11, -37, -97

Let's plot these points on a scatterplot:

(x, y) points:

(4, 40)

(8, 20)

(12, -11)

(16, -37)

(20, -97)

After plotting the points, we can analyze the trend in the data.

By observing the scatterplot, it is clear that a linear or quadratic model would not fit the data well since the points do not follow a straight line or a parabolic curve.

Next, we can try the logarithmic, exponential, and power models to see if any of them fit the data better.

Using a calculator or computer to perform the regression analysis, we find that the regression equation with the highest R² value is:

y = 82.3 - 8.275x

This equation corresponds to option : y = 82.3 - 8.275x

The regression equation represents a linear model that best fits the given data. The R² value indicates how well the model explains the variability in the data, and in this case, the linear model provides the highest R² value compared to the other models.

It's important to note that the specific values of the coefficients in the regression equation may vary slightly depending on the calculator or software used for the analysis. However, the overall best-fit model remains the same.

For more such questions on mathematical model

https://brainly.com/question/28592940

#SPJ8

Answer:

2/3

Hope that this helps!

Answer:

Deepika Deepika use 32% of his salary ^ housed and which is the amount of this is Monica is in driving on the monthly on the this is profit or loss we know don't don't know that we are what we do if x x is value of you don't know why I don't know it's your mistake I don't care

Answer:

x = 15

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the Altitude- on- Hypotenuse theorem

( leg of large Δ )² = ( part of hypotenuse below it ) × ( whole hypotenuse )

x² = 9 × 25 = 225 ( take the square root of both sides )

x = \(\sqrt{225}\) = 15

a. After the 1-for-10 reverse split, the number of outstanding shares would be 3,560,880. This is because the reverse split reduces the number of outstanding shares by a factor of 10.

b. To determine the post-split price per share, we first need to calculate the total market capitalization of the corporation after the split. The total market capitalization is the product of the number of outstanding shares and the price per share.

Before the split, the market capitalization was:

35,608,800 shares * $0.41 per share = $14,597,008

After the split, the market capitalization is:

3,560,880 shares * x per share, where x is the post-split price per share.

Since this is a monetary non-event (as shown in part c below), the market capitalization after the split should be the same as the market capitalization before the split:

$14,597,008 = 3,560,880 shares * x per share

Solving for x, we get:

x = $4.10 per share

Therefore, the post-split price per share is $4.10.

c. This split was a monetary non-event for the corporation because it did not change the total market capitalization of the corporation. The market capitalization before the split was $14,597,008, and after the split, the market capitalization was still $14,597,008. This means that the split did not change the value of the corporation. Instead, it simply consolidated the number of outstanding shares and increased the price per share by a factor of 10.  The overall value of the company remained the same.

To know more about corporation:

https://brainly.com/question/31313496

#SPJ1

a. After the 1-for-10 reverse split, the number of outstanding shares would be 3,560,880.

b. the post-split price per share is $4.10.

c. This split was a monetary non-event for the corporation because it did not change the total market capitalization of the corporation.

How to find splits?

a. After the 1-for-10 reverse split, the number of outstanding shares would be 3,560,880. This is because the reverse split reduces the number of outstanding shares by a factor of 10.

b. To determine the post-split price per share, we first need to calculate the total market capitalization of the corporation after the split. The total market capitalization is the product of the number of outstanding shares and the price per share.

Before the split, the market capitalization was:

35,608,800 shares * $0.41 per share = $14,597,008

After the split, the market capitalization is:

3,560,880 shares * x per share, where x is the post-split price per share.

Since this is a monetary non-event (as shown in part c below), the market capitalization after the split should be the same as the market capitalization before the split:

$14,597,008 = 3,560,880 shares * x per share

Solving for x, we get:

x = $4.10 per share

Therefore, the post-split price per share is $4.10.

c. This split was a monetary non-event for the corporation because it did not change the total market capitalization of the corporation. The market capitalization before the split was $14,597,008, and after the split, the market capitalization was still $14,597,008. This means that the split did not change the value of the corporation. Instead, it simply consolidated the number of outstanding shares and increased the price per share by a factor of 10.  The overall value of the company remained the same.

To know more about corporation:

brainly.com/question/31313496

#SPJ1

The equation is represented as follows:

p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1

The Hardy-Weinberg equation is a mathematical formula used in genetics to predict the frequency of genetic traits in a population. The equation is named after the scientists G. H. Hardy and W. Weinberg, who independently developed it in 1908 and 1909, respectively.

The equation states that the frequency of a genetic trait in a population will remain constant over time as long as certain conditions are met. These conditions are:

No mutations occur in the gene responsible for the trait

There is no natural selection for or against the trait

There is random mating within the population

The population size is large

The Hardy-Weinberg equation can be used to calculate the frequency of the dominant and recessive alleles (versions of a gene) in a population, and the probability of different genotypes (the combination of alleles an individual has) and phenotypes (the physical expression of the trait) within that population.

Where p is the frequency of the dominant allele, q is the frequency of the recessive allele, and p^2 represents the proportion of homozygous dominant individuals, 2pq represents the proportion of heterozygous individuals and q^2 represents the proportion of homozygous recessive individuals.

The Hardy-Weinberg equation is a useful tool for understanding how genetic traits are inherited and how they change over time. It is widely used in population genetics, evolutionary biology and medical genetics.

It is also important to notice that the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is a theoretical concept that is rarely met in real populations due to the existence of genetic drift, migration, mutation, nonrandom mating and natural selection.

to know more about equation refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29657992#

#SPJ11

A real number is in between 14 square root and 15 square root is 3.8.

It should be noted that real numbers include rational and irrational numbers.

✓14 = 3.74

✓15 = 3.87

Therefore, a real number is in between 14 square root and 15 square root is 3.8.

It should be noted that this implies a number that can be sent between the square roots.

Learn more about real numbers on:

brainly.com/question/563320

#SPJ1

Answer:

a ≤ −4 or a ≥ 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope This Helps!

In Chapter 18 of "Monster," Briggs tries to cause doubt about Bolden's testimony by focusing on option C, the "deal Bolden would receive for testifying."

What happens in the novel?

In the novel "Monster" by Walter Dean Myers, Briggs is the defense attorney for Steve Harmon, a 16-year-old boy on trial for his alleged involvement in a robbery and murder. Bolden is a key witness in the trial who testifies against Steve.

Bolden is a criminal who claims to have been present during the robbery and identifies Steve as one of the perpetrators. Briggs attempts to discredit Bolden's testimony during the trial in order to cast doubt on Steve's guilt. According to Briggs, Bolden is lying. His reason to testify is the deal promised to him that would get him out of jail sooner.

For that reason, option C is the best answer.

Learn more about "Monster" here:

https://brainly.com/question/26214126

#SPJ1

The given two equations represent the same line, and there are infinitely many solutions to this system of equations.

A solution to an equation is a number that can be substituted for the variable to provide a true number statement.

The system of equation is given as:

y = 2x+7   .....(i)

y-2x = 7   .....(ii)

We can solve this system of equations by substituting y = 2x + 7 from the first equation into the second equation:

y - 2x = 7

(2x + 7) - 2x = 7 (substituting y = 2x + 7)

7 = 7

As we can see, the equation simplifies to 7 = 7, which is always true.

This means that the two equations represent the same line, and there are infinitely many solutions to this system of equations.

Any point on the line y = 2x + 7 will satisfy both equations, so there is no unique solution to the system.

Learn more about the solution to the equation here:

brainly.com/question/15272274

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. The second number line, the third number line, the first number line.

2.

\(a) \: 1 \frac{7}{8} > \frac{7}{4} \)

\(b) \: \frac{21}{5} = 4 \frac{1}{5} \)

\(c) \frac{13}{4} < 3 \frac{5}{6} \)