Answers
A test designed to assess whether newly graduated law school students should be granted the legal right to practice law would be considered to be an achievement test.
Achievement tests are made to judge how well you have absorbed the course material and to gauge your level of legal knowledge. They play such a crucial role in your course as a result. Your performance on the achievement test, which counts toward your final grade, is an indication of how well you understand a particular area of law. A student's performance on state-adopted content standards is measured by achievement tests, which are summative standardized tests.
An acquired skill or body of knowledge is tested in an achievement test. The most popular form of an achievement test is a standardized test created to assess the skills and knowledge acquired at a specific grade level, typically through planned instruction like training or classroom instruction.
Learn to know more about Laws on
https://brainly.com/question/26463698
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which of the roles in the court system that we discussed would you want as a career.
Answers
Answer: COURT REPOTER, Court reporters, also known as guardians of the record because of their impartiality and role within the judicial process, capture the words spoken by everyone during a court or deposition proceeding. Court reporters then prepare verbatim transcripts of proceedings.
Explanation: i am not sure what you and your teacher where talking about but here's a answer
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
What is the meaning of Chinese Exclusion Act?
Answers
The Chinese Exclusion Act was a federal law in the United States that prohibited Chinese immigrants from entering the country for a period of 10 years, from 1882 to 1892.
It was the first federal law to specifically target a group of immigrants based on their nationality. The law was enacted due to anti-Chinese sentiment and competition for jobs, especially in the western states, and it was motivated by the belief that the Chinese were culturally and racially inferior. The law was later expanded and made permanent until it was finally repealed in 1943. The Chinese Exclusion Act had far-reaching impacts on the Chinese community in the United States and remains a significant event in American history.
Learn more about Chinese Exclusion Act here :
https://brainly.com/question/513896
#SPJ4
why are lower class individuals overrepresented among offenders and victims. What is the relationship between race
and class and why does the prison population look so different from the general population?
Answers
The lower class individuals overrepresented among offenders and victims as they are marginalized communities.
What is overrepresentation?Overrepresentation is the circumstances where ethical groups are presented more than in general population.
What is victim?Victim is a person harmed, injured, or killed as a result of a crime, accident, or other event or action.
What is marginalized?Marginalized is a person, group, or concept treated as insignificant or peripheral.
To learn more about overrepresentation and marginalization refer
https://brainly.com/question/7781429
#SPJ2
types of ethical violations that can occur when excessive use of force occurs
Answers
There are several types of ethical violations that can occur when excessive use of force occurs.
The first is a violation of the principle of non-maleficence, which requires that individuals do no harm. When excessive force is used, it can result in physical harm to the victim, which is a clear violation of this principle.
Another ethical violation that can occur is a violation of the principle of beneficence, which requires that individuals act in a way that benefits others. When excessive force is used, it is not benefiting the victim in any way and may even be causing harm to them.
A third ethical violation that can occur is a violation of the principle of justice, which requires that individuals treat others fairly and equitably. When excessive force is used, it may be targeting certain individuals or groups unfairly, which is a clear violation of this principle.
Overall, excessive use of force can lead to a range of ethical violations, including violations of the principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. It is important for individuals and organizations to be aware of these potential violations and to take steps to prevent them from occurring.
For more about excessive:
https://brainly.com/question/10264043
#SPJ11
True/false. In an automobile negligence action by a plaintiff against a defendant, a bystander testified for the plaintiff. The defendant later called a witness, who testified that the bystander's reputation for truthfulness was bad
Answers
In an automobile negligence action by a plaintiff against a defendant, a bystander testified for the plaintiff. The defendant later called a witness, who testified that the bystander's reputation for truthfulness was bad is said to be True.
A witness testifying on behalf of the plaintiff in an automotive negligence lawsuit brought by the plaintiff against the defendant may be vulnerable to cross-examination over their track record of being truthful. The spectator's credibility may be questioned and the defendant's case may be strengthened if the defendant later summons a witness who attests that the bystander has a poor reputation for being truthful.
For such more question on plaintiff:
brainly.com/question/15649498
#SPJ4
Diana is the owner of a business in the United States. Her company has purchased a warehouse in Thailand, and it is managed by Diana’s associate, who is an American citizen. The government of Thailand seizes the warehouse and all the goods stored there. Diana’s attorney informs her that the US courts cannot help her take legal action. To which law or convention is the attorney referring?
Answers
The law or convention is the attorney referring to is sovereign immunity.
According to the legal doctrine of sovereign immunity, the federal government cannot be sued without its permission. This principle stems from the notion that the sovereign or state is the ultimate authority and shouldn't be subject to the jurisdiction of another sovereign or state without its permission. According to this rule, foreign governments and their agencies are typically exempt from legal action in courts in other nations, including the United States.
In this instance, the lawyer is notifying Diana that since Thailand is a sovereign state and its government has seized the warehouse, it is not subject to legal action in American courts. The Thai government has the authority to confiscate the warehouse even if it is owned by a US firm and run by an American citizen, and US courts lack the authority to file a lawsuit against the Thai government.
Read more about sovereign immunity on:
https://brainly.com/question/14185506
#SPJ4
mistake is a defense whenever the mistake prevents the formation of any fault-based
Answers
Mistake is a defense whenever the mistake prevents the formation of any fault-based crime.
Mistake is one of the defenses against committing a crime. There are various reasons why a person may use the mistake defense to counter allegations of criminal activity.
A mistake can be an intentional or unintentional act that leads to criminal behavior. It is used when an individual is not aware of the illegal act they are committing. In some cases, a mistake can be used as a defense in criminal cases. When it prevents the formation of any fault-based crime, it acts as a shield.
There are two types of mistakes that can be made: mistake of law and mistake of fact. A mistake of fact is when someone misunderstands a situation or circumstance. The misunderstanding can be of any type, such as the belief that something is legal when it is not.
In contrast, a mistake of law occurs when someone is aware of the situation but misunderstands the law. It can be used as a defense when the mistake of fact prevents the individual from understanding the nature of the offense committed.
Learn more about Mistake visit : brainly.com/question/9057143
#SPJ11
What is Legal Process of Khula in Pakistan
Answers
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed
Explanation:
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
The mayor and city council have a secret meeting to pass a law requiring citizens to pay a special tax for new sewer lines. Which characteristic of rule of law was violated in this situation?
Accountability to the law
Transparency of institutions
Decisions based on the law
Consistent application
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Transparency of institutions
HELP NEED IT DONE BY 11:59 200 WORDS PLS!
Outline the current differences between the rights of criminals and those of victims. Should there be changes in there rights?
Answers
Answer:
Yes po siguro hindi ako sure
An investigator takes a photograph that includes a dollar bill as a size reference. This is most likely what type of photograph?
Answers
Answer:
intermediate photograph
Explanation:
Alex wants to sell his family farm in Maryland to pay off his credit cards and get a fresh start in California. Breonna wants to buy it. The law that will govern this transaction comes from
a Statutory law
b. Uniform Commercial Code
c Common law
d. Agency law
e. All of the above
Answers
The law that will govern the transaction between Alex and Breonna in the sale of the family farm in Maryland depends on various factors. In this case, the applicable law would likely be a combination of options (a) Statutory law and (c) Common law.
Statutory law refers to laws enacted by legislative bodies, and there may be specific statutes in Maryland that govern the sale of real estate. Common law, on the other hand, refers to legal principles and precedents established through court decisions.
The sale of real estate typically involves common law principles, such as contract law and property law. However, it's important to consult with a legal professional to determine the specific laws and regulations that apply to the sale of real estate in Maryland.
Learn more about Statutory law
https://brainly.com/question/8868792
#SPJ11
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answers
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Kalia is considering a career as a correctional officer. She isn’t sure whether she should apply at a private or government-run facility. She is looking for a position with high pay. She also wants an adequate amount of training since she’s never worked in corrections before. She doesn’t mind working at a max facility or working with lots of inmates but prefers not to work with those with special needs or high profile inmates. Which kind of facility should she choose?
Answers
Kalia should consider applying to a government-run correctional facility as they offer better training, higher salaries, and typically do not house as many special needs or high-profile inmates as private facilities
What kind of facility should she choose?
Based on Kalia's preferences, she should consider applying to a government-run facility. Government-run correctional facilities typically offer better training for correctional officers and have more strict hiring processes compared to private facilities. Also, government-run facilities are more likely to have higher salaries and benefits packages. Additionally, private run correctional facilities often house more special needs inmates and high profile inmates, which Kalia prefers not to work with. In contrast, government-run facilities are more likely to have separate facilities for these types of inmates, giving Kalia the opportunity to work in a regular facility with a more general inmate population. Therefore, a government-run facility would be a better fit for Kalia's career goals and preferences.
Learn more on correctional facility here;
https://brainly.com/question/6705028
#SPJ1
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Answers
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 gives the President the power of appointment, but the guidelines for removal come from which two Supreme Court cases?
Answers
One of the guidelines for removal come from which the Supreme Court cases of Myers v. United States.
What is the ruling in Myers case?The Supreme Court ruled that the restrictions on presidential removal power requiring Senate consent to remove postmasters were unconstitutional.
The judges explains further that the power to remove appointed officials rests solely with the president and does not require congressional approval.
Therefore, the case of Myers v. United States serves as a guideline for removal of appointed officials.
Read more about Myers case
brainly.com/question/26214126
Which agency helps the President prepare the annual Economic Report to Congress?
the Council of Economic Advisers
the White House Office
the Office of Management and Budget
the Office of Administration
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Council of Economic Advisers, an agency within the Executive Office of the President, is charged with providing the President objective economic advice on the formulation of both domestic and international economic policy.
Answer: the Council of Economic Advisers
Explanation: trust me
In two paragraphs, explain the significance of katarungan pambarangay in criminal justice system
Answers
Answer:
1. Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine justice system. It provides for resolution of disputes at the barangay level in order to achieve peace and harmony within the community and to provide an accessible and effective form of justice for community members.
2.Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.
States request assistance from other states through interstate mutual aid and assistance agreements such as: A. Tiered Response B. Emergency Management Assistance Compacts (EMACs) C. Stafford Act D. Economy Act or other applicable authorities
Answers
Answer:
Option B (EMACs) is the correct choice.
Explanation:
EMAC (Emergency Management Assistance) package - all facets of package international cooperation that are at the heart including its country's national protection program. Since before the US-signed Civil Defense as well as Disaster Treaty dated 1950.A robust and transparent system that requires states provinces contribute personnel, equipment, and services to help neighboring states respond and rehabilitate provides aid in conflicts or relief organizations proclaimed by the Governor.Other examples offered are not relevant to either the theory in question. So that the option described will be the right one.
Who is the JA director of the ReaperAaron BA?
Answers
Answer:
What is JA, ReaperAaron, and BA?
Explanation:
Toward the end of the chapter, ‘Nightmare,’ Cortney experiences memory loss. What does Cortney continue to ask about? What are some of the things he ‘can’t’ remember?
Answers
Courtney's memory loss in the chapter "Nightmare" is a moving illustration of the psychological wounds that soldiers endure long after they leave the battlefield.
Memory loss results in loss of identity and sense of self in addition to knowledge loss. For example, Courtney's inability to remember the names of her fellow soldiers shows how fragmented her identity is and how she feels isolated from others who have gone through the same tragedy. Furthermore, Courtney's concern for the safety and well-being of her fellow soldiers raises the possibility of a strong sense of survivor's guilt. His memory loss may be a coping mechanism for him as he struggles with the idea that he has lived while others have not.
Learn more about memory loss, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28826460
#SPJ1
what are common work contexts for Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop? Check all that apply.
outdoors, exposed to weather
exposed to disease or infections
spend time using hands to handle objects, tools, or controls
spend time climbing ladders, scaffolds, or poles
exposed to contaminants
Answers
Answer: Duties may include tilling soil and applying fertilizers; transplanting, weeding, thinning, or pruning crops; applying pesticides; or cleaning, grading, sorting, packing, and loading harvested products. May construct trellises, repair fences and farm buildings, or participate in irrigation activities.
Job Zone Examples: These occupations involve ...
Education: Some of these occupations may re...
Explanation:
Answer:
A, C, E
1, 3, 5
Explanation:
this won't help you author of this question, but it will people using edge in 2022
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answers
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
Armand orally agrees to pay Borges to seed and harvest a quarter of Armand's farm acreage for four planting seasons. After Borges prepares the land and plants the first crop, Armand says that the deal is off. Borges can most likely recover on a theory of
Answers
Armand orally agrees to pay Borges to seed and harvest a quarter of Armand's farm acreage for four planting seasons. After Borges prepares the land and plants the first crop, Armand says that the deal is off. Borges can most likely recover on a theory of quasi contract.
A quasi-contract is a requirement set down by the law to avoid undue enrichment. This is also referred to as a constructive contract or a contract that is implied by law. A quasi-contract may be assumed by a court in the absence of a real contract, but not if an express or implicit in fact contract already exists that covers the same subject area.
Mutual agreement is not required and a court may impose an obligation regardless of the parties' intentions since a quasi contract is not a real contract. The remedy in a quasi-contract lawsuit for damages is often restitution or recovery under the quantum meruit principle. Each case is examined separately to establish liability.
We can learn more about quasi contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/29335196#
#SPJ4
35. David Fahey, a businessman in a medium-sized Ohio town, decides to run for city council. He has a
master's degree, is married, has three sons, and is a respected member of society. He fears he may lose the
upcoming city council election to a newcomer, Keith Joseph, who recently moved back to town after
establishing himself in South Carolina.
David hires his best friend, John, to call in a bomb threat on election day to a precinct where his rival, Keith
Joseph, is expected to garner majority support. This act is an example of
a. election fraud
a
Answers
The action of falsely calling a bomb threat on the election day to prevent the people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud.
Election fraud entails the following actions that includes:
election manipulationvoter fraud or riggingillegal interference with election process for personal purpose.The intention of David to call a false bomb threat on the election day to prevent people to vote for personal reason is an example of election fraud because it aims to reduced the vote garner by the opposition candidate.
Therefore, the Option A is correct because the act is an example of election fraud.
Read more about Election fraud:
brainly.com/question/24981124
Which of the following statements is true about CERTs? A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood. B. CERTS often support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects in the community. C. Being a CERT volunteer requires little time because disasters do not occur frequently. D. CERTS never support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects.
Answers
Answer:
A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood.
Explanation:
CERT is an educational program that seeks to instruct volunteers who can help their communities in emergencies or disasters, in addition to teaching concepts for preventing these disasters, low-complexity rescues and even simpler medical procedures that can make all the difference in safety of the victims .. As stated before, the goal is for the volunteer to be able to help their community in the face of a need.
Is it technically cheating if you use these answers for yourself?
Answers
if you copy like see it before thinking of it then yes
if not then no
Question:
Is it technically cheating if you use these answers for yourself?
Answer:
The answer to your question would actually be yes, and no.
Explanation:
If you would state it word for word that would be cheating because your just copying someone else's work that would be called plagiarism, but if you only used it as a resource and changed it into your own words it wouldn't be considered cheating.
I hope it helps you!
~XxBells is a cute girlxX~
#Learn with Brainly
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
Answers
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
This case study involves a security officer discharging his firearm at a vehicle in a public transit station. The security officer had instructed a motorist who had parked his vehicle in a no parking area to leave the area and park elsewhere. Video evidence showed the security officer position himself a few feet behind the vehicle. The security officer claimed that there was ample room for the driver to pull forward. The driver placed the vehicle in reverse and slowly backed into the security officer making contact with the security officer. The security officer drew his firearm and as the vehicle was driving away firing several rounds into the rear tire of the vehicle
Answers
This case study involves a security officer discharging his firearm at a vehicle in a public transit station. The incident occurred after the security officer instructed a motorist to move his vehicle from a no parking area.
The motorist reversed his vehicle, making contact with the security officer, who then fired several rounds into the rear tire of the vehicle.
The incident raises important questions regarding the appropriate use of force by security officers and the circumstances under which discharging a firearm is justified. The security officer's decision to draw his firearm and shoot at the vehicle's tire should be evaluated based on the principles of proportionality and reasonableness.
In this case, the security officer's actions may be seen as excessive and potentially disproportionate to the situation. While the security officer may have felt threatened by the contact with the vehicle, it is essential to assess whether the use of lethal force was necessary to address the immediate danger or protect the officer's life. Alternatives, such as stepping aside or seeking assistance from colleagues, should be considered.
The incident also raises questions about the security officer's training and adherence to protocols. Proper training should emphasize de-escalation techniques, conflict resolution, and the appropriate use of force. Investigation and legal proceedings would be necessary to determine whether the security officer's actions were within the bounds of the law and consistent with established guidelines for the use of force by security personnel.
Learn more about established guidelines here:
https://brainly.com/question/30579868
#SPJ11