a worldview centered on western civilization privileging europeans as the only actors in history is known as:

During World War II, the United States issued ration stamps to Americans at home in order to concentrate all essential surplus for the army.

Ration stamps were a way of distributing scarce goods such as food, gasoline, and clothing, which were in high demand due to the World War II effort. These stamps were used to limit the amount of these items that people could buy, which helped to ensure that there was enough left over for the military. Each person was issued a set number of ration stamps, which they could use to purchase a certain amount of each item.

This system helped to prevent hoarding and ensure that everyone had access to the basic necessities during a time of great need.

To know more about World War II, clcik here:

https://brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ11

The site of surrender at Gettysburg was Appomattox Court House. This is where General Robert. Lee of the Confederate Army surrendered to General Ulysses.

Grant of the Union Army on April 9, 1865. The surrender marked a significant turning point in the Civil War. The turning point of the Civil War was the Battle of Gettysburg, not the surrender. The battle took place from July 1 to July 3, 1863, in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated at Ford's Theater in Washington, D.C. on April 14, 1865. He was shot by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer, and died the following day. The city taken by Admiral David Farragut was New Orleans.

To know more about surrender visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23868412

#SPJ11

Answer: conservative white Democrats who wanted to regain control over the south

Explanation: I took the quiz

Answer:

C: Conservative white Democrats who wanted to regain control over the South.

Explanation:

Answer: The Russian Provisional Government took control of Russia.

Explanation: Then, led by Lenin, the Bolsheviks seized power in November 1917 which led to the establishment of The Soviet Union or the USSR. (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)

Answer:

Loyalist and Patriot views compare and contrast in many ways as their views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain differed. Loyalists were people who stayed loyal to the King during the 1700s whereas patriots were people who wanted independence from the King. These two view points differed in many events and were shared in speeches throughout the 1700s.

    Reconciliation was a huge topic during the 1700s as loyalist believed that was the greatest option. For example William Smith, in document 6, expressed that reconciliation is better than trying to gain independence as it was in both countries mutual interests and safety. He explained that independence will further damage Great Britain and the colonies relationship and it would make the colonies life harder. In document 7, Charles Inglis made it clear that reconciliation would restore peace and the colonies could go back to their normal lives. However the patriots, such as the majority of the colony in Malden, Massachusetts, in document 1, believed that Great Britain did many wrong doings which could not be made up through peace.

   The arguement of whether the colonies should be indepenent states was highly debated between the loyalists and the patriots. In document 4, loyalist Samuel Seabury shared that the colonies, if they became independent states, would dispute about many things causing them to go to war against each other. As he explained, it would “turn our arms on one another;—province against province,—and destruction and carnage would dessolate the land.” without a stable monarchy. Furthermore, patriots such as Thomas Paine, in document 5, wrote Common Sense to explain that staying connected to Great Britain would cause trade ruin in the colonies if Great Britain ever went to war with another country.

    The view of the King of Great Britain can also be compared between the loyalist and the patriots as both sides thought differently on his influence within the colonies. In Document 3, John Dickinson shared that liberty under the English Monarchy was still enjoyable while England also supplied us with support in military arms and the pride of their name. He stated that the King would tear them apart due to him being so powerful. Whereas the patriots, expressed in document 1, believed that independence from the King would bring them closer to a well established country and they would not serve under any King any longer. Furthermore, patriot beliefs also included those that thought the King was being greedy and had ruined trade for the colonies with other countries many times.

    In conclusion, loyalist and patriots expressed different views on reconciliation, independent states, and the King of Great Britain. Loyalist views were usually loyal to the King and supported Great Britian’s ideals. Whereas, patriot views were usually regarded to independence for the colonies and to be free from royal rule.

Explanation:

hope this helps:)

Answer: well, They were both respected leaders of the American Civil Rights Movement, struggling for racial equality and freedom. King advocated non-violent direct action and believed self-respect would come through integration, Malcolm X promoted a segregationist approach that sought to instil in Black people a pride in their African heritage.

hope this helped

Answer:

a

Explanation:

The development of Latino communities in Florida and New York is one of the most significant aspects of the contemporary history of Latino immigration to the United States. In this essay, I will discuss the experiences of Cuban Americans in Florida, Puerto Ricans in New York, and Dominicans in New York.

I will focus on the economic, social, and cultural dimensions of these communities, as well as the processes of naturalization, participation in local politics, and community development. The Cuban American community in South Florida developed in the 1970s, following the Cuban revolution and the exodus of many Cubans to the United States. Cuban Americans in Florida have been successful economically, establishing businesses, and participating in the development of the local economy. Additionally, they have been actively engaged in the process of naturalization, becoming U.S. citizens and participating in the political process. The Cuban American community has been successful in establishing itself as a political force in Florida, supporting Republican and Democratic candidates and advocating for immigration reform.

Puerto Ricans and Dominicans settled in New York in the 1950s and 1960s, establishing vibrant communities in neighborhoods like East Harlem and the South Bronx. Puerto Ricans in New York established "colonias," or neighborhoods, that were characterized by a strong sense of community and shared culture. The Puerto Rican community in New York also played an important role in the development of the commercial and professional sector, opening businesses and providing services to the community. The Dominican community in New York is more recent, and it has brought with it a unique sense of citizenship and race. Dominicans in New York are often seen as black or Latino, depending on the context, and they have developed a sense of solidarity with other minorities in the city.

The experiences of Cubans, Puerto Ricans, and Dominicans in Florida and New York are characterized by similarities and differences. All three communities have developed a strong sense of culture and community, and they have been successful in establishing themselves economically. Additionally, all three communities have been involved in the process of naturalization and participation in local politics. However, there are also differences between these communities. For example, the Cuban American community is more politically conservative than the Puerto Rican or Dominican communities, and the Dominican community in New York has a different sense of citizenship and race. Despite these differences, all three communities have made significant contributions to the social, cultural, and economic fabric of the United States.

To know more about communities visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29811467

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Mexican Constitution

Explanation:

The Mexican Constitution of 1917 has 137 articles. The constitution guarantees people with citizenship, enumerate basic human rights for all Mexicans, organize a government, and mandate land reform.

One of the positive reason for the Mexican Constitution was that it promises to restore lands to native peoples, the separation of church and state.

For rich people, it was negative as the land was to be separated among people equally.

When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a US Senator from Louisiana.

When Huey Long proposed his "Share Our Wealth" plan in 1934, he was serving as a U.S. Senator from Louisiana. Long was a charismatic and controversial figure who had risen to political prominence as the Governor of Louisiana in the 1920s, where he implemented a range of populist policies that aimed to redistribute wealth and power.

As a U.S. Senator, Long continued to push for radical reforms to address the economic and social inequality that he saw as endemic in American society. The "Share Our Wealth" plan was Long's most ambitious proposal, calling for a progressive tax on income and inheritances, a limit on individual wealth, and a guaranteed income and education for all Americans. Long believed that this plan would stimulate the economy, reduce poverty, and create a more equal society.

Long's proposal was met with both support and opposition. Some saw him as a champion of the people, fighting against the wealthy elite and advocating for the working class. Others saw him as a demagogue and a threat to the established order, whose radical policies could lead to economic collapse and social chaos. Despite this opposition, Long's ideas had a lasting impact on American politics, influencing the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and shaping the political discourse of the 1930s and beyond.

To learn more about Share Our Wealth refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30237232

#SPJ11

An accurate 365-day calendar represents an Aztec adaptation to their environment.

The Aztec civilization developed within the valley of United Mexican States, impacted between high mountains and encircled by lakes that provided fish, waterfowl, potable water and reeds for thatching and weaving. The climate was delicate. The Aztecs extended for roughly 800 miles on a northwest-southeast axis.

The Aztecs knew so as to quiet down with success that they'd want several engineers and builders and traders. They adapted to their environment. They designed canoes in order that they might hunt and fish.

To learn more about Aztecs here

brainly.com/question/11253411

#SPJ1

The Ming dynasty in China was founded by Zhu Yuanzhang (朱元璋),  served as its first emperor. He had a tough and turbulent existence before he was made emperor and given the name Hongwu.

Zhu was born in 1328 in a little Chinese hamlet called Anhui. His parents and siblings passed away in a famine when he was only 16 years old, and his family was not wealthy. Zhu spent years traversing the nation begging for food after being compelled to become a Buddhist monk.

Zhu enlisted in a rebel army in 1352 that was engaged in conflict with the Mongol-controlled Yuan dynasty that was in power. Zhu advanced swiftly through the ranks of the rebel army to achieve military leadership success. In the end, he rose to the position of general, and in 1361 he crowned himself King of Wu. Zhu and his army fought against the Yuan empire for several more years before finally taking control of Dadu (today's Beijing) and ending the Yuan dynasty in 1368. Zhu then assumed the name Hongwu and proclaimed himself the ruler of the Ming dynasty.

Despite coming from modest beginnings, Hongwu was able to unite the nation and found a new dynasty that would survive for more than 250 years.

Learn more about Ming dynasty here:

https://brainly.com/question/2507461

#SPJ4

Answer:

The biggest challenge facing newly independent countries is the challenge of political stability and keeping the country united, this is because newly independent countries often became independent as a result of bloody wars that resulted in an unstable enviroment and political feuds among conflicting factions.

For leaders to prevent his from happening, they would have had to be assertive in their goals and in the form of government that they feel would have been convenient for the newly independent country.

Answer:

Why do you think some countries were more successful than others with pollitcal transitions?

Some transitions where peaceful and some cause longer-term instablility because of who was leading, many of the counrties that had been colonized by other larger more powerful countries had damaged and taken away many things from smaller less powerful countries that they tried to conlonize or invade for resources and power, including younger and more smarter individuals that could've helped to bettter those countries, especially in different smaller countries.

So once you include that into the mixture it really would depend on circumstances and settings for a leader to do well with what they were given, since a lot of the more smarter individuals and minds that could've been better to lead and help smaller countries were lost during when larger more powerful countries forcefully invaded and tried to colonize and control smaller countries.  

Cause different people from smaller countries that weren't very educated and is given an already unstable country cause from others trying to either forcefully conlonize, control, or invade for resources, uneducated people who haven't had experience with those things to begin with wouldn't do well in the first place trying to handle a counrty let alone one thats already unstable, let alone handle or control a country or handle political transitions properly.

Then on the other side you have more educated leaders who have experience and knowledge with such things as well as how to control and handle a counrty properly, as well as being in control of some of the more stronger, larger, and powerful countries with the ability to take over, colonize, and invade other smaller countries for resources and power, gave them the better hand in things as well as more successful as a country and as a leader in general.

What do you think were the biggest challenges facing newly independent countries?

1. Their was already larger and more powerful countries with experienced, knowledgable, and powerful leaders sending out their own people to colonize smaller countries and lands as well as invade other smaller countries for resources.  

2. A lot of the smaller countries as well as newly made independent countries had already been colonized by other larger more powerful countries or they were invaded for resources, or they were in the process of having those things happen. This led to lots of loss of smarter and stronger people that could've helped the smaller countries, as well as loss of good resources that could also help smaller countries.

3. Some newly independent countries were countries that had split off from the larger more powerful countries because they thought that they were too controlling, in the process making enemies with the larger more powerful countries for the time being.

4. Being a smaller country surrounded by larger more powerful countries meant that the power was obviously one sided and the smaller countries didn't have much of a chance to fight back if they had to defend themselves from anything so if it did ever come to it they would have to either give up to larger counrties or be destroyed and have resources taken if a larger country with more defenses wanted to colonize or invade.

5. Being a smaller country, let alone a newly formed one meant not as many open resources available, as well as not having much on a trade market because of the size.

Would it have been possible for leaders to prevent these problems before they happened? why or why not?

Yes, although it would have to be the larger more powerful countries to do it since they were the ones that would have that control and power to prevent it.

Larger countries could've tried to offer any extra resources or supplies to smaller countries to try to build them up and make them larger, as well as make more allys in the process, as well as if any other larger countries tried to invade, control, or colonize smaller countries against their will they would have other larger more powerful countries to help defend and protect them from that threat, in exchange they could've given larger countries extra resources and supplies they needed in exchange for allying with them, instead of the larger more powerful countries just invading and taking resources and land, and having smaller countries get build up of losses in the process.

Explanation:

Answer:

2*2=4

3*3=9

8*8=64

63*63=3969

Answer: He controlled the local newspapers and radio stations. He also used Hitler Youth to teach children to support him and his beliefs.

Explanation:

Answer:

people in Hawaii embrace the potential for peace

Explanation:

https://youtu.be/lCQFTsNP8sI

Based on the available information, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer without access to the specific map mentioned. However, we can make a general comparison of political participation in India, China, Russia, and Mexico.

India is the world's largest democracy, which allows for a considerable amount of citizen political participation through elections, freedom of speech, and the right to protest. China, on the other hand, is an authoritarian one-party state with limited opportunities for citizen political participation, as the government tightly controls the political process. Russia, while nominally a democracy, has a history of authoritarian leadership and limited political freedom, which restricts citizens' political participation. Mexico is a federal republic with democratic institutions, and while it has faced issues with corruption and political violence, it generally allows for more political participation than China or Russia.

To know more about political participation

https://brainly.com/question/30228517

#SPJ11

The incorrect statement about the Mayflower Compact is that it gave all colonists the right to vote. Only male adult church members were allowed to vote.

The statement about the Mayflower Compact that is NOT correct is: 'it gave all colonists the right to vote'.

The Mayflower Compact was indeed an agreement that established the colonists as a united body.

However, it did not provide the right to vote to every colonist. Only male adult members of the Pilgrims' church had voting rights.

Mayflower Compact promised adult male settlers the right to vote for the Governor and his advisors each year, and It did support the idea of majority rule. But the right to vote was not extended to all colonists.

https://brainly.com/question/11377923

#SPJ2

The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness. The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.

The United States Civil War was one of the most important conflicts of the 19th century in which characters such as Ulysses S Grant stood out and momentous events such as the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln.

Ulysses S. Grant (1822 - 1885), was an American soldier and politician who stood out during the United States Civil War as leader of the Union army. Later, he served as President of the United States from 1869 to 1877.

The assassination of Abraham Lincoln occurred on April 14, 1865 at around 10:25 p.m. in Washington, D.C., as the American Civil War was drawing to a close.

His death occurred several hours after the shot. The main motivation for this attack was to destabilize the Union and cause chaos to seize power by sympathizers of the confederate cause of the Southern States.

Learn more about Civil War in: https://brainly.com/question/14234520

Answer:

Industrial output rose as China’s economy transformed into a communist system.

Explanation:

PLS MARK BRAINIEST

Answer:d

Explanation:

Trust

Al-Qaeda, an extremist organization, carried out several terrorist attacks that led to the events of September 11, 2001.

These attacks were motivated by many things, including the ideology of the attackers, their displeasure with American foreign policy, and His desire to wage a global jihad against what he saw as the Islamic enemy. The aggressors saw the United States as a representation of Western dominance and influence, and they used acts of violence to seek revenge and promote their cause. The reasons for such tragic events are complex with the ideological, political and socio-economic motives driving terrorism.

Learn more about Al-Qaeda, here:

https://brainly.com/question/888085

#SPJ4

Several significant trips took place during this period, including Ferdinand Magella's circumnavigation of the globe, the hunt for a Northwest Passage trade route to Asia, and Captain James Cooks' expeditions that allowed him to reach Alaska.

Who was Ferdinand Magella?

Portuguese adventurer Ferdinand Magellan made his voyages. The Spanish expedition he planned and oversaw in 1519 to the East Indies across the Pacific Ocean to establish a maritime trade route is what most people remember him for. It was during this expedition that he discovered the interoceanic passage that would later bear his name and made history by becoming the first European to navigate from the Atlantic to Asia.

A new path to the established trading nations of Asia was represented by the Northwest Passage. James Cook FRS was a notable British explorer, navigator, geographer, and captain in the British Royal Navy who is best known for his three expeditions to New Zealand, Australia, and the Pacific Ocean between 1768 and 1779.

To know more about Ferdinand Magellan, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13864491

#SPJ1

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The differences between the working class, upper class during the socialist reformers during the progressive era were the following.

The Progressive Era in the United States was a time in US history when people tried to face and solve all the problems of the Gilded Age. During this period, rich families got richer and the working class got poorer. The upper class amassed incredible wealthiness while the working class, on the other hand, lived in poverty and sometimes in extreme conditions. This made that owners of big corporations dislike workers and their fight for better working conditions. Big companies produced food but under unhealthy and unsanitary conditions. This created radical political views, neglecting the protection of the environment, and the increasing problem of overpopulation in the large cities due to constant immigration.

Answer/Explanation:

Jimmy Doolittle of the Doolittle raid attack Tokyo. Japan believed emperor was untouchable. When the operation was launched and was successful they immediately had a change of thought. There was no way the would be able to beat America.

Answer:

Tokyo

Explanation:

yes,doolittle's bombing raid over Tokyo raised hopes for an American victory, the bombing occurred on April 18 1942

Answer:

Nicholas's secret police, also known as the Okhrana, and Stalin's purge, which is commonly referred to as the Great Purge, were two separate events that occurred at different times and under different circumstances. However, there are some connections that can be made between the two.

Explanation:

The Okhrana was established in 1881 during the reign of Tsar Alexander III to combat political opposition and maintain order in Russia. The secret police had broad powers to investigate and suppress any groups or individuals deemed a threat to the government, and they were notorious for their use of surveillance, informants, and brutal tactics.

Fast forward to the Stalinist period, which began in the late 1920s and continued until the mid-1950s. During this time, Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union, and his regime carried out purges against political opponents, real or perceived. The purges were a way for Stalin to consolidate power and eliminate any potential threats to his rule. Millions of people were arrested, imprisoned, or executed during the purges.

While the Okhrana and the Stalinist purges were separated by several decades, they both involved the use of state power to suppress dissent and maintain control. The methods employed by the Okhrana, such as surveillance and the use of informants, would later become hallmarks of the Soviet secret police, including the NKVD (which carried out the purges). Additionally, the purges can be seen as a continuation of the tradition of suppressing dissent that began with the Okhrana.

In summary, while the Okhrana and the Stalinist purges did not directly lead to one another, they share some similarities in terms

Answer:

Portugal

Explanation:

Prince Henry the Navigator! He funded explorations of the African coast.