Act utilitarianism assesses Thoreau's resistance based on consequences. Rule utilitarianism evaluates adherence to rules. They may disagree on Thoreau's actions' morality depending on their criteria for moral evaluation.
According to act utilitarianism, an action is morally right if it maximizes overall happiness or utility in a particular situation. In the case of Henry David Thoreau's resistance, act utilitarianism would assess the moral value of his actions based on the consequences they produced. Thoreau's act of civil disobedience, demonstrated in his refusal to pay taxes to protest slavery and the Mexican-American War, could be seen as moral or immoral depending on the perceived overall happiness it generated.
For example, if Thoreau's resistance led to positive outcomes such as increased awareness, social change, and the abolition of slavery, act utilitarianism would likely view his actions as morally right. Conversely, if his resistance resulted in negative consequences such as violence or increased social unrest, act utilitarianism might consider his actions immoral.
On the other hand, rule utilitarianism focuses on following moral rules or principles that, when universally applied, maximize overall happiness. Rule utilitarianism might evaluate Thoreau's resistance by examining whether adhering to a general rule of civil disobedience would lead to greater happiness overall.
Given the nature of Thoreau's resistance, it is possible for act and rule utilitarianism to disagree on the morality of his actions. While act utilitarianism primarily considers the specific consequences of an action, rule utilitarianism evaluates the general adherence to rules that promote overall happiness. Thus, the two theories may have different judgments based on their respective criteria for moral evaluation
Know more about civil disobedience here:
https://brainly.com/question/29544784
#SPJ8
Species A - took 23 hours for the egg to reach first instar and the eggs were collected from the scene and kept at a constant temperature of 78 degrees Fahrenheit. What was the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar?
The ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756.
What is ADH?
Accumulated degree hour (ADH) is the given amount of thermal energy which an egg-based animal or insect requires to develop from one stage to the next of its life, especially during the incubation period.
The formula for calculating ADH is given as:
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature).
Data and Calculations:Number of hours for the egg to reach the first instar = 23 hours
Storage temperature of the eggs = 78 degrees Fahrenheit
Number of hours at the second instar = 28 hours
Assumed minimum development temperature threshold for eggs = 51 degrees Fahrenheit
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature)
= 756 {28 x (78 - 51)}
Thus, the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756. Though, ordinarily, an egg requires 1,890 ADH (70 x 27) to grow from the first instar to the 2nd instar.
Learn more about instar development at https://brainly.com/question/11659006
Corporations may underreport cybercrimes because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence.
A. True
B. False
It is completely appropriate and correct to mention that the corporations may underreport cybercrime, because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.
What is the significance of cybercrime?A cybercrime can be referred to or considered as a form of criminal activity that takes place over the internet using a computer or a network of computers. Such crimes are handled by a completely different department of police authorities.
There have been instances where the plaintiffs have underreported their cybercrime, as they are concerned about the breach of their private data and confidential information.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of a cybercrime.
Learn more about cybercrime here:
https://brainly.com/question/28836591
#SPJ12
To help manage risk, it is essential that you blank
avoid overhead signs
remain alert to conditions or objects
avoid advance channelization
recognize signal backplates
that can increase levels of risk
To help manage risk, it is essential that you remain Alert to Conditions or Objects. Option B
This is further explained below.
What is risk management?Generally, Risk management is the process of identifying, evaluating, and prioritizing risks, followed by the coordinated and cost-effective application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability of unfavorable events or the impact those events will have, or to maximize the potential for the realization of opportunities.
In conclusion, It is necessary that you Maintain Constant Vigilance Regarding Conditions or Objects in Order to Assist with Risk Management.
Read more about risk management
https://brainly.com/question/4680937
#SPJ1
Many legal experts believe that the Sherman Atrust Act of 1890 Section 2 is more controversial than the Sherman Antitust 12 Act of 1890 Section 1. How / why would you believe that is true or false
It is true that Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act is often considered more controversial than Section 1 due to the complexities in defining monopoly power and determining anticompetitive behavior by individual companies.
The primary reason for this is that the language used in Section 2 is considered ambiguous and vague by many, which has led to a great deal of legal debate and interpretation over the years.
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act deals with any contract, trust, or conspiracy that is intended to restrain trade or commerce between different states or with foreign nations. This section of the act is relatively straightforward and has been used successfully in many cases to prosecute companies and individuals who engaged in anti-competitive practices.
Section 2, on the other hand, deals with monopolizing or attempting to monopolize a market. However, the language used in this section is more open to interpretation. It is not always clear what constitutes an attempt to monopolize a market, and this has led to a great deal of debate and legal uncertainty. For example, some legal experts have argued that simply having a large market share is not enough to constitute a monopoly or an attempt to monopolize.
Others have argued that certain practices, such as exclusive dealing arrangements or tying arrangements, should be considered attempts to monopolize even if they do not result in a complete monopoly of a market. In conclusion, while both Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act have been controversial over the years, many legal experts believe that Section 2 is more controversial due to the ambiguous and vague language used in the section.
You can learn more about Antitrust Act at: brainly.com/question/838791
#SPJ11
a state law requires that local governments prepare general fund and special revenue fund budgets on a basis that differs from the basis of accounting required by generally accepted accounting principles (gaap): the actual amounts in the budgetary comparison schedule should be reported on the gaap basis.
Based on the provided information, the state law requires local governments to prepare general fund and special revenue fund budgets using a basis of accounting that differs from the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
However, when reporting the actual amounts in the budgetary comparison schedule, they should be reported on the GAAP basis.
This means that while the local governments are allowed to use a different basis of accounting for their budgeting purposes, when it comes to reporting the actual amounts, they are required to adhere to GAAP. GAAP is a set of accounting principles and standards that provide consistency and comparability in financial reporting.
By reporting the actual amounts on the GAAP basis, it ensures that the financial information is presented in a manner that is widely accepted and understood.
To know more about accounting principles refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/28903748
#SPJ11
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DCMA) provides for which of the following: Select one:
a. Civil liability for transmitting copyrighted materials online.
b. Criminal penalties for circumvention of copyright protection systems
c. Has as its primary focus the criminalization of technologies that secure digital copies of music, videos, and literary works.
d. All of the above.
Which is the better theory of adjudication: Law as Integrity or
Legal Realism? According to Dworkin & Leiter
The debate between Law as Integrity (LAI) and Legal Realism (LR) centers on the extent to which courts should use their own interpretation of existing law to resolve legal disputes.
Dworkin and Leiter’s analysis leans towards LAI, stating that a method of adjudication based more on legal precedent than for judges to exercise their own personal discretion should be the norm. They urge judges to strive towards interpretive coherence and emphasize integrity, which allows judges to work with the available evidence as an interconnected web. This in turn makes it easier for future judges to use precedent as a basis for their legal opinions and reduces the chances of contradiction or inconsistency.
On the other hand, LR encourages judges to go beyond the facts and consider the social and political context of the case at hand, allowing them to make decisions based on their own personal values and experience. In conclusion, Dworkin and Leiter opt for LAI in adjudication since this form of reasoning is bound by more solid principles and can maintain consistency and coherency in judicial decision-making.
To know more about Legal Realism , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33116384
#SPJ4
20 points !! please help
Compare and contrast the U.S. Presidency and Congress with the Michigan governorship and state legislature in terms of membership, terms, term limits, and powers under the Constitution.
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the terms with their description.
-employees of an organization
-disclosing prospective buyer’s personal details to others
-extending clarification where necessary
-buyers of services offered by an organization
good customer service
external customer
internal customers
bad customer service
Answer:
1. Internal customers.
2. Bad customer service.
3. Good customer service.
4. External customers.
Explanation:
1. Internal customers: employees of an organization. The individuals working within an organization are referred to as internal customers.
2. Bad customer service: disclosing prospective buyer’s personal details to others. In some cases, this act is punishable by a court of competent jurisdiction because customer information are considered confidential and must be protected.
3. Good customer service: extending clarification where necessary. It entails a customer relationship manager, salesperson or other employees working in an organization, offering to help customers with their challenges or product choices.
4. External customers: buyers of services offered by an organization. These are the group of people who patronize a business firm or organization for its finished goods and services.
A plan that provides the rules, goals, and a framework for government is
called a ________?
A. Consensus
B. Preamble
C. Political Party
D. Constitution
Is it illegal to videotape someone without their consent.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
which of the following statements describes the attitudes of the federalists and the antifederalists toward representation as it would likely be observed under the proposed constitution?
The thinking of Anti-federalists to have a fair representation in small Republics, whereas, the federalists thought that representation is not at all important to be achieved, and this best describes their individual attitudes.
The representation of the public has been the biggest debate over the past few centuries in the formation of a fully-democratic American society. Where the Anti-federalists have utmost importance to their representation, the federalists were seen keeping mum on the topic of representation.
Learn more about representation here:
https://brainly.com/question/5822281
#SPJ4
Complete question
What best describes the attitudes of Federalists and Antifederalists toward representation as it would likely be observed under the proposed Constitution?
2. Share an example of a case where you
have experienced that the law can
contribute to a harmonious and peaceful
society (500 words) (5 Marks)
One notable example is the implementation of anti-discrimination laws. These laws aim to protect individuals from unfair treatment based on factors such as race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. By establishing legal protections and consequences for discriminatory actions, these laws help foster a more inclusive and equitable society.
Consider a hypothetical scenario where a workplace is plagued by discrimination. Employees of various backgrounds face mistreatment, unequal opportunities, and a hostile work environment. In such a situation, the implementation and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws can play a vital role in promoting harmony and peace.
Firstly, the existence of these laws sends a clear message that discrimination is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. This helps create a cultural shift and raises awareness among both employers and employees about the importance of equal treatment and respect for diversity. It encourages people to challenge their biases and prejudices, leading to a more inclusive and harmonious workplace.
Secondly, anti-discrimination laws provide legal recourse for victims of discrimination. If an employee feels they have been unfairly treated, they can file a complaint or lawsuit based on the violations of these laws. This empowers individuals to seek justice and hold perpetrators accountable. By providing a legal framework for addressing discrimination, these laws help resolve conflicts and restore harmony within the workplace.
Moreover, anti-discrimination laws also have a preventive effect. Knowing that discriminatory behavior can have legal consequences acts as a deterrent. Employers and employees are more likely to comply with the law, fostering an environment where individuals can work together peacefully and without fear of discrimination.
Additionally, anti-discrimination laws can positively impact society beyond the workplace. By promoting equal opportunities and fair treatment, these laws contribute to a more cohesive and integrated society. They help reduce social divisions, promote understanding and empathy among different groups, and create an environment where diversity is celebrated rather than suppressed.
However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of laws in promoting a harmonious and peaceful society depends on their implementation, enforcement, and the broader social context. Legislation alone cannot eliminate discrimination entirely, but it is a crucial tool in creating a legal framework that supports equality and justice.
In conclusion, the implementation of anti-discrimination laws is an example of how the law can contribute to a harmonious and peaceful society. By providing legal protections, recourse for victims, deterrence for perpetrators, and fostering a culture of inclusivity, these laws promote equality, diversity, and ultimately contribute to a more cohesive and peaceful society.
Learn more about anti-discrimination laws
https://brainly.com/question/32410901
#SPJ4
This branch has the Supreme Court and District Courts.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answer: judicial branch
Explanation:
Any record of crimes such as offenses known to the police , arrests, convictions, or commitments to prison- can be considered at most _ or an estimate of crimes committed
Any record of the crimes, such as offenses known to police, arrests, convictions, or commitments to prison, can be considered at most an estimate of crimes committed.
What are crimes?Crimes are illegal acts that are prohibited by law and punishable by the government through fines, imprisonment, or other penalties. Examples of crimes include theft, assault, fraud, drug trafficking, murder, and vandalism. These offenses are generally classified as either misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the severity of the crime and the potential punishment. Misdemeanors are less serious crimes, such as traffic violations or minor theft, and typically carry a penalty of up to one year in jail or a fine. Felonies are more serious offenses, such as murder or armed robbery, and carry a penalty of more than one year in prison or even the death penalty in some cases. The legal system is responsible for investigating and prosecuting crimes to maintain social order and protect the rights of citizens.
To learn more about crimes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27187116
#SPJ1
Elaborate the functions of the three-tiered federal court system.
Answer:
The U.S. has a three-tiered structure of courts. The first one or the first level is trial courts. There is the Supreme Court on the second level, and the third level is the federal court. Trial courts or the federal courts look into the state matters dealing with the general public, the Supreme Court, on the other hand, is the highest court of the country, and the federal court is the court to hear the matters of the constitution.
Explanation:
District Courts and Circuit Courts
District courts are the primary or level 1 of the federal court system; the purpose of the district court is to settle the disputes of different states. Also, it is the first place of appeal. They function to deal with civil and criminal cases.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the only institution where the cases can be challenged after being heard in the circuit courts and district courts. There is only one Supreme Court, and it is of the highest order. The Supreme Court can decide on all the matters concerning civil or state.
Federal Court
Federal court works for the matters of the state. Federal courts take into account only the matters concerning the legislature and high officials. They help the state to deal with the matters of the legislation separately.
-Hope this helps <3
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
true or false: because punitive damages are not permitted under federal statutory law, a plaintiff suing for violation of section 11 of the 1933 act cannot file a concurrent common-law fraud action.
Answer:
Explanation:
False- Punitive damages may be recovered in a concurrent common-law fraud action.
The given statement because punitive damages are not permitted under federal statutory law, a plaintiff suing for violation of section 11 of the 1933 act cannot file a concurrent common-law fraud action is FALSE.
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 imposes strict liability on issuers, underwriters, and other specified parties for material misstatements or omissions in a registration statement. However, it does not preempt common-law fraud claims, which require a showing of intent or recklessness.
Although federal law does not provide for punitive damages in securities cases, some state laws do. Therefore, a plaintiff may be able to recover punitive damages in a concurrent common-law fraud action filed in state court.
In fact, courts have consistently held that Section 11 does not displace common-law fraud claims, and that a plaintiff may pursue both causes of action concurrently. The plaintiff may also elect to pursue only the common-law fraud claim and waive the Section 11 claim.
To know more about federal statutory law, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/26195686#
#SPJ11
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called _________ dividends.
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called cumulative dividends.
Cumulative dividends are a type of preferred stock dividend that accumulates when it is not paid during the normal dividend distribution period.
This means that the unpaid dividends are carried over to the next dividend period and must be paid before any dividends can be paid to common shareholders.
Cumulative dividends are a way for companies to incentivize investors to purchase preferred stock, which generally has a lower dividend rate than common stock.
They provide a level of security to preferred shareholders, ensuring that they will eventually receive their dividend payments, even if the company is experiencing financial difficulties. This is because preferred shareholders have priority over common shareholders when it comes to receiving dividend payments.
In addition, cumulative dividends can be a way for companies to attract long-term investors who are interested in receiving a steady stream of income from their investments.
However, they can also be a burden for companies that are experiencing financial difficulties, as they must prioritize paying off the accumulated dividends before they can distribute any dividends to common shareholders or reinvest in the business.
Overall, cumulative dividends are an important feature of preferred stock that can provide stability and security for investors, but they can also create additional financial obligations for companies.
For more question on "Cumulative Dividends" :
https://brainly.com/question/14971141
#SPJ11
Which of the following findings was
least important in the court's deciding in favor of the Henningsens in Henningsen v. Bloomfield
Motors, Inc.?
A. In 1958, The "Big Three" (General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler) represented 93.5% of passenger car production.
B. The insurance carrier's inspector and appraiser of damaged cars advanced the opinion that something went "wrong" with the steering wheel.
C. There was no privity of contract between the Henningsens and Chrysler.
D. The manufacturer only agreed to replace defective parts 90 days after the sale and only if the part is sent to the factory, transportation charges prepaid, and examination discloses to
its satisfaction that the part is defective.
In Henningsen v. Bloomfield, the court found that there was no privity of contract between the Henningsens and Chrysler, which was the least significant of the findings.
C. There was no privity of contract between the Henningsens and Chrysler.
Property/homeowners insurance is a type of insurance that covers damages to homes or businesses. Property owners are protected by homeowners insurance. In the event that your home or possessions are damaged by fire or theft, this insurance will pay to repair or replace them.
Additionally, it provides coverage in case one of your visitors destroys your property or you cause damage to someone else's property. Between the Henningsens and Chrysler, there was no privity of contract.
Learn more about insurance
https://brainly.com/question/9094558
#SPJ4
If a citizen wants to learn more about a candidate's background, position on issues, and recent activities, what action will allow the citizen to access the MOST information?
A watching the candidate's television advertismentwatching the candidate's television advertisment
B visiting the candidate's Internet websitevisiting the candidate's Internet website
C listening to what friends say about the candidatelistening to what friends say about the candidate
D reading a newspaper article that mentions the candidate
Conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if the
practitioner intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that
client.
True or False
Answer:
True
The conduct of a practitioner may indeed be sanctionable if the practitioner intentionally misleads a client so as to defraud that client. This is based on the ethical and professional standards that govern various professions, particularly those in the legal, medical, and financial sectors.
To understand this in detail, let's break it down into smaller logical steps:
1. Professional Conduct: Practitioners across various fields are bound by certain rules of professional conduct. These rules are designed to ensure that practitioners act in a manner that is ethical, honest, and in the best interests of their clients. They cover a wide range of behaviors, including honesty in communications, confidentiality, conflict of interest, and more.
2. Intentional Misleading: Intentionally misleading a client involves knowingly providing false or inaccurate information with the aim of deceiving the client. This could take many forms, such as lying about qualifications, providing incorrect advice, or withholding important information.
3. Defrauding a Client: Defrauding a client involves using deceit or dishonesty to gain an unfair or dishonest advantage, often financial. This could involve overcharging for services, billing for services not provided, or manipulating a client's decisions for personal gain.
4. Sanctions: If a practitioner is found to have intentionally misled a client so as to defraud them, they can face sanctions from their professional body. These sanctions can range from fines and reprimands to suspension or revocation of their license to practice.
5. Evidence and Investigation: Allegations of such misconduct would typically be investigated by the relevant professional body or regulatory authority. The investigation would seek to gather evidence to determine whether the practitioner did indeed intentionally mislead the client and defraud them.
6. Legal Implications: In addition to professional sanctions, practitioners who defraud their clients could also face legal consequences. This could include criminal charges for fraud or civil lawsuits for damages.
Therefore, it is true that the conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if they intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that client.
The probability that this answer is correct is very high given that it is based on widely accepted principles of professional ethics and conduct.
which statement explains why the federal reserve has a tough job?
The statement that explains why the Federal Reserve has a tough job is "There are lags in the effects of monetary policy, and economic conditions continuously change."
This is because there are always time lags in the economy, meaning that monetary policy changes may take up to several years to come into effect. This is not an easy task, as the economy is continuously changing, meaning that the Fed must be proactive and make quick decisions to prevent economic downturns and inflation.The Federal Reserve is also responsible for monitoring and responding to changes in inflation, unemployment, and interest rates.
All of these factors are interconnected and affect the overall health of the economy. The Fed's decisions must be balanced and take into account the impact of their actions on various sectors of the economy, such as business, consumers, and the government.
It is true that the Fed is not legally allowed to change the supply of money, but it can influence the money supply through various means, such as adjusting interest rates and implementing open market operations. Despite this, there are still lags in the effects of monetary policy, which can make the Fed's job more challenging.
To know more about Federal Reserve visit-
brainly.com/question/14700070
#SPJ11
lawyer's client, Consuela, reveals that she is cheating on her spouse, which is why she was taking an unusual route to work. While taking this different route, her tire got punctured and she had to step out of the car to check it out. While Consuela was taking a look at the tire, a random man (whom she did not know) ran past Consuela and slipped a murder weapon in her bag. Just as she was getting the murder weapon out of her bag, the cops arrived and arrested Consuela as an accessory to murder. Prosecutors contend that Consuela knows who the "random man" is, and they allege that she has assisted that man to escape capture. Despite the serious charges against Consuela, she tells her lawyer that she does not want to disclose the real reason why she was taking a different route to work (that she had gone that route in order to be with her paramour - the person with whom she was having an affair). Is the lawyer permitted to reveal what Consuela told her - the reason she was taking that route? Yes, because it serves as evidence and will prevent the client from getting framed. Yes, because the client told the lawyer, which automatically means the lawyer can reveal that information in courts. Yes, because of the mandatory disclosure rule. O No; in this case, the lawyer may only reveal a client's spoken intent to soon commit a crime (i.e., to carry out an impending crime). O No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty
The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".
The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.
Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486
#SPJ11
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review allowing the Supreme Court to decide if a law is?
A Unconstitutional
B. Ex post facto
C. Self-Incriminating
D. Certiorari
Answer:
A Unconstitutional
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
Have a good rest of your evening.
Mica is an employee of Natural Gas Company and a member of a union of company employees. Under federal law, Mica and other union members have the right to
Answer:
a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.
Explanation:
As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.
Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
Discuss the differences between a statute, an ordinance, and a code including what governmental body enacts and administers each type of law.
Statute, ordinance, and code are different types of laws that vary in their scope, enactment, and administration.
A statute is a type of law enacted by a legislative body, either at the state or federal level. It is typically a comprehensive and general law that applies to a broad range of situations or issues.
State statutes are enacted by state legislatures, while federal statutes are enacted by the U.S. Congress. These statutes are administered and enforced by the respective state or federal agencies responsible for their implementation.
On the other hand, an ordinance is a law enacted by a local government, such as a city or county. Local governments have the authority to create ordinances to address specific issues or matters within their jurisdiction. Ordinances are typically more focused and specific compared to statutes.
They may cover areas such as zoning regulations, building codes, public safety, and local taxation. The administration and enforcement of ordinances are carried out by local government authorities, such as city councils or county boards.
To learn more about government-
brainly.com/question/29894072
#SPJ11
Question 5 of 10
what are two broad categories of tort remedies?
a. damages and writs
b. temporary and permanent injunctions
c. damages and compensation
d. damages and injunctions
Damages and compensation are two broad categories of tort remedies. Damages are granted for bodily harm, whereas compensation is on a higher level. Compensation seeks to put the injured party in the same situation as if the injury had not occurred by providing monetary compensation for the harm done.
While 'damages' categories refers to compensation awarded or sought, 'damage' refers to the hurt or loss for which compensation is claimed or awarded. 'Damage' can relate to monetary or non-monetary compensation , whereas 'damages' refer to monetary recompense. Payment or reward for work or services provided, or for injury incurred, is referred to as compensation.
To learn more about categories, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8866495
#SPJ4