According to Jared Diamond, modern world inequalities can be traced back to?

Answer:

C.ww2 is the answers you're welcome

Answer:

His knightly manner and his prowess in the Third Crusade (1189–92) made him a popular king in his own time as well as the hero of countless legends.

Explanation:

The military weapon advancement that led to the end of trench warfare was the invulnerability of the tank to machine gun and rifle attack decreased the tactic. (Option C).

In trench warfare, occupied lines, which are primarily made up of military trenches, provide troops with excellent protection from enemy small-arms fire and a substantial degree of artillery protection. Trench warfare is a style of conflict in which opposing armed forces use networks of dug-in trenches to launch attacks, counterattacks, and defenses.

In conclusion, both sides of World War I frequently used the defensive military tactic of trench warfare. While it gave soldiers some protection from enemy fire, it also slowed down their ability to advance fast, lengthening the combat.

Learn more about trench warfare here: https://brainly.com/question/15236196

#SPJ1

Answer:

I believe and consider Nelson Mandela to be a hero because his ways of working things out was bringing himself and his people a better life. On the other hand, Augusto Pinochet, I consider him a villain because he was responsible for many tragedies, yet never really charged for them.

Background

Nelson Mandela was a South African activist, politician, anti-apartheid, and a philanthropist.

Born: July 18, 1918

Died: December 5, 2013

Augusto Pinochet was a Chilean dictator that took his power for granted and gave himself a bad history, although he didn't see it that way.

Born: November 25, 1915

Died: 2006

Contributions

Contributions

Nelson Mandela taught his nation the real meaning of activism, showed his power for human spirit, brought Apartheid to an end, became first black president of South Africa, and remained devoted to the idea of peace and justice.

Augusto Pinochet, wasn't really a positive contributor. He violated the peoples' rights, ruined education for some, snatched job opportunies, canceled elections that were for good causes, illegally elected himself as president, and he was known for dividing rather than uniting.

Legacy

Legacy

Nelson Mandela caused a positive impact around the world. He became a representation of an achievement with dedication to a good cause. He also brought peaceful protests and when needed, armed resistance.

Augusto Pinochet is remembered as a cold-hearted who tortured and murdered thousands of people. Murdered/disappeared more than 3,200 and tortured about 28,000. Chile's military today doesn't want to recognize him and political groups that favored him, now reject him and his family.

A Glimpse

A Glimpse

Nelson Mandela on the right

Augusto Pinochet on the left

Mandela Arrested

Mandela Arrested

His actions landed him in prison for 27 years. But, before he was senteced a lifetime, he was arrested many times.

Here is a short glimpse of Mandela walking out of prison.

Pinochet Haunted Chile

Pinochet Haunted Chile

Here is a short video of Pinochet's life in power.

Conclusion

I chose Mandela as a hero because he is someone I've always been inspired by. He taught to stand up for good causes and remain devoted, until you achieve it.

I chose Pinochet as a villain because I believe he didn't have what it took to be a presisdent, he shouldn't have had any power whatsoever. He was resposible for thousands of deaths

Explanation:

\(ANSWER\)

the Voting Rights Act of 1965

~hope it helps~

The 1965 Voting Rights Act was a result of the Freedom Summer campaign. Option (D) is right as a result.

Congress often discussed the rights of the numerous African freedmen during the closing years of the American Civil War and the Reconstruction Era that followed.

By 1869, amendments had been passed to end slavery, grant citizenship, and guarantee equal protection under the law, but after Ulysses S. Grant was elected president in 1868, a majority of Republicans came to believe that preserving the voting rights of black men was crucial for the party's future.

After rejecting more comprehensive versions of a suffrage amendment, Republicans put up a compromise amendment on February 26, 1869, which outlawed limitations on voting rights based on race, color, or prior slavery.

Learn more about  Fifteenth Amendment, from :
brainly.com/question/30308963

#SPJ5

Answer:

A government strategy in dealing with issues insides a country

Explanation:

Let's first know what all of them means:

A government strategy in dealing with other nations is called a diplomacy

A mutual union or association between two or more counties for a benefit to all is called a allies

A government strategy in dealing with issues insides a country is called a domestic policy

Sending aid to countries in the form of money,military, or resources is called a foreign aid

Hence, the answer is A government strategy in dealing with issues insides a country

~lenvy~

Option C

Take a example below

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I Sure Hope That This Is Right And If It Is I Hope That I Helped You Answer Your Question.

The correct optionis B) Some Indians warned the fort and helped supply and defend the settlers until English reinforcements could save the colony. In 1622, the Native Americans in Virginia launched a surprise attack on the English settlements, killing nearly 350 people.

However, the attack failed to dislodge the English from their strongholds, including Jamestown. Some Indians did warn the fort and helped supply and defend the settlers until English reinforcements could save the colony. The English retaliated by launching a series of brutal attacks on Native American villages, which led to a period of uneasy peace. The Virginia Company was not disbanded, and Virginia remained a royal colony until the American Revolution. Overall, the conflict had a devastating impact on both Native Americans and English settlers and marked the beginning of a long and tragic history of violence and displacement.

To know more about Americans visit:

https://brainly.com/question/529299

#SPJ11

Answer:

I hope this is right :)

Explanation:

The US war with Mexico can be described as a conquest, as there was extremefervor and greed for land. While some justified this through the idea of Manifest Destiny,the series of battles were gruesome and violent. Even some Americans believed thattaking land away from Mexicans was unconstitutional and detrimental to foreignrelations. The motive was clear- more slave states, plantations and farming, profiting offof lands, and rapid expansion to declare power. The American insensitivity can remindone of prior times with the conquests when we were under Spain’s rule.

To determine the extent to which each interpretation has merit, it is important to consider the context and evidence supporting each interpretation.

The interpretation that argues Houston's acceptance of Lincoln's offer would have sparked anger and a sense of betrayal among secession supporters has merit. The secession movement was driven by a deep commitment to protecting and preserving slavery, and any action seen as undermining that cause would have been met with strong opposition. The historical context of the time suggests that secession supporters were passionate and committed to their cause, and they would have viewed Houston's decision as a betrayal of their principles.

On the other hand, the interpretation that highlights the potential for tensions and violent reactions also has merit. The secessionist movement was marked by intense emotions and a willingness to resort to force to defend their position. If Houston had chosen to reject secession and remain in office, it is plausible that some secession supporters would have reacted with aggression, seeking to remove him from power or replace him with a more aligned leader. The potential for violence and further division cannot be discounted.

Ultimately, the merit of each interpretation depends on the specific historical context, the beliefs and motivations of secession supporters, and the potential consequences of Houston's decision. While both interpretations offer valid perspectives, the extent to which they hold merit can vary based on the available evidence and the understanding of the dynamics surrounding the secession movement in Texas during that time.

To read more about Secession Movement click here

https://brainly.com/question/30246213

#SPJ11

The Roman emperor who became well known for allegedly making his horse a Roman consul was Caligula.

He reportedly appointed his beloved horse, Incitatus, to the position of consul, although some historians believe this may have been a satirical rumor spread by his enemies. According to the accounts, Caligula held his horse in high regard and treated it with great luxury and extravagance. The appointment of Incitatus as a consul is considered by many to be an exaggeration or a symbolic gesture to mock the senatorial class rather than a genuine political appointment.

For further information on Caligula visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32269067

#SPJ11

The correct word that tells us what would happen when the Fed reduces interest rates has been filled in below

The interest rate is the percentage by which the benefits of saving money woud grow. When people save money, the money would generally earn an interest overtime

First: The Fed reduces interest rates.

Second: Banks will make more loans.

Third: The money supply increases.

Fourth: People and businesses are more likely to spend and borrow money.

Fifth: The number of jobs will increase.

Sixth: People will buy more cars, homes, and fun stuff.

Seventh: Growth of the economy speeds up.

Eighth: Inflation will increase.

Read more on interest rate here:https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

Answer: the world's first olive tree

Explanation:

Minerva struck the ground with her spear and the world's first olive tree came into existence, offering the city food. The citizens liked Minerva's gift better, and so Athens was named after Minerva (Athena).

Numerous injustices persist, including systemic racism, gender inequality, economic disparities, human rights abuses, environmental degradation, and political oppression. These injustices manifest in various forms and affect different communities worldwide. For example, racial discrimination continues to marginalize and disadvantage minority groups, with disparities in areas such as education, employment, and criminal justice. Gender inequality persists in many societies, leading to unequal access to opportunities, violence against women, and limited reproductive rights.

Human rights abuses occur in numerous regions, including violations of freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, as well as infringements on privacy and the right to a fair trial. Economic inequalities remain stark, with a significant portion of the global population living in poverty, lacking access to basic needs such as healthcare, education, and clean water.

Environmental injustices are also prominent, with marginalized communities disproportionately bearing the brunt of pollution, climate change, and resource exploitation. Political oppression, censorship, and restricted freedoms curtail democratic processes and limit citizens' ability to express their opinions or participate fully in society.

While addressing these injustices is crucial, it is important to pursue change through legal and peaceful means. Civil disobedience, while historically associated with some movements, carries legal consequences and should be undertaken thoughtfully and responsibly. Instead, individuals and communities can engage in activism, advocacy, education, and support organizations and initiatives working towards justice and equality.

Ultimately, the fight against injustices requires collective effort, public awareness, policy changes, and sustained commitment to creating a more equitable and just world for all.

for more questions on injustices  

https://brainly.com/question/28780655

#SPJ8

True equality among cultures is essential for a multicultural society. However, it is difficult to achieve because some cultures are more dominant than others, leading to inequalities. A change in mindset and behavior is necessary to ensure that all cultures are treated equally. True equality can only be achieved when there is no dominance of a specific culture over other cultures.

Equality is a term that refers to treating people equally, impartially, and with respect. In a multicultural society, cultural equality is essential. A world where all cultures have equal standing and rights may seem ideal, but can there ever be true equality among cultures? The answer is not so simple because it depends on how one defines culture. When talking about culture, it is often confined to the dominant culture, which is a culture that has the most influence in society. Most countries have a dominant culture, whether it is recognized or not.

There is no doubt that in today's world, all cultures, both minor and major, are appreciated and valued. The major problem is, some cultures receive more attention, recognition, and power than others. Inequalities may occur in various forms, including power, access to resources, representation in the media, and education. Therefore, true equality cannot be achieved in such a scenario.

Only when everyone is given equal representation, rights, and benefits can true equality be established. To achieve this equality, a change in mindset and behaviors is necessary to recognize and respect the various cultures that make up our society. This change may take time, and it may require patience, but it is essential to strive for a society where all cultures are treated fairly and with respect. Hence, we can say that true equality can only be achieved when there is no dominance of a specific culture over other cultures.

For more such questions on culture, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/514395

#SPJ8

Answer:

“The ways in which nations waged war from 1500 to 1648 and in the period 1750−1871 were

similar in that alliances were a significant factor in wars in both time periods, but they differed

because 16th−17th century wars were primarily religious while 18th-19th century wars were

politically and economically motivated.” (Addresses both a similarity and a difference and takes a

historically defensible position.)

• “Following the Thirty Years’ War, the reasons behind going to war began to shift from

ecclesiastical to secular. However, regardless of the time period war was seen as a sense of pride

for a nation and brought about unity among the people. While the reasons behind starting war may

have shifted, the nationalist sentiment it sparks in the people has not changed.” (Indicates a shift

in reasons for war as a difference and provides a general but acceptable similarity.)

• “In both time periods, European states waged war for the similar purpose: to stop foreign

aggression and to expand the territory and influence of their own. But they differ significantly in

developments in fighting technologies, such as mobilization, transportation, communication,

weapons, and medicine.” (Though general, thesis provides defensible similarity and difference

between the two periods.)

Examples of unacceptable theses:

• “Priorities and technology have altered the reasons and methods of warfare. From 1800−1871, a

constant in the way war occurs is the presence of a strong, driven leader, and one difference

between war from 1500 to 1648 and 1750 to 1871 is the motivation behind warfare, as earlier

leaders used religion as their motive and later leaders used politics and unification as their

motivation for war.” (Addresses difference, but “strong driven leader” is too general and ahistorical

to receive credit for similarity.)

• “The ways in which European states fought wars between periods 1500−1648 and 1750−1871

differed in the ideology and cause but were the same in terms of devastation and casualty.”

Explanation:

hope that helps you

Answer:

This is an opinion question so it is about what you think

Explanation:

x=8

.....................

Answer:

As enslaved people became more and more in demand in the South, the slave trade that spanned from Africa to the colonies became a source of economic wealth as well. Working long hours, living in crude conditions, and suffering abuses from their owners, African captives faced harsh conditions in colonial America.

Explanation:

How they benefited.

U.S. Foreign Policy's objective was straight forward: by supporting governments or rebel groups that opposed communism, containment of the spread of communism and, as a result, the influence of the U.S.S.R.

This was accomplished by supplying aid, weapons and sometimes troops, such as in the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

For what reason did we do battle with Vietnam?

The primary objective of the United States' entry into Vietnam was to thwart a communist takeover. It failed in that regard: In July 1976, the two Vietnams became one communist state. Similar fates befell neighboring Laos and Cambodia under communist rule.

Why did the Cold War begin?

The United States of America and the Soviet Union's transformation into formidable global powers during World War II intensified their rivalry. The United States and the Soviet Union began the Cold War as a result of their ideological and political rivalry following the defeat of the Axis powers.

Learn more about Vietnams here:

https://brainly.com/question/24845081

#SPJ13

"There were fewer prisoners there because the rest had been evacuated." is the correct option.

The Soviets then managed to get through the German fortifications and started moving into Krakow. The SS made the decision to flee as the Red Army advanced closer and closer.

They prepared what the captives called "death marches," which were protracted, forced marches from Auschwitz to other concentration and death camps.

Most of those left behind were middle-aged people or kids under the age of 15. Additionally, 600 bodies, 370,000 outfits for men, 837,000 pieces of clothes for women, and 7.7 tonnes of human hair were discovered by Red Army soldiers.

To know more about Army, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/877121

#SPJ4

Answer:

a term used to describe racial segregation laws

Explanation:

Answer:

B - A term used to describe racial segregation laws

Explanation:

technically it's B AND C, since Jim Crow was in fact a racist minstrel character, which was the motivator for titling these laws under that label; but they want you to pick B for sure.

Ethnic diversity encourages tolerance by promoting cultural understanding, breaking down stereotypes, developing empathy and perspective-taking, and building social cohesion among individuals from different ethnic backgrounds.

1. Exposure to different cultures: When people from different ethnic backgrounds come together, they have the opportunity to learn about each other's traditions, beliefs, and customs. This exposure helps foster understanding and appreciation for different cultures, which can lead to increased tolerance. 2. Breaking down stereotypes: Interacting with individuals from diverse ethnic backgrounds challenges and breaks down stereotypes. Through personal experiences and interactions, people begin to realize that stereotypes are not accurate representations of an entire ethnic group. This leads to a more open-minded and accepting attitude towards others.

3. Enhanced empathy and perspective-taking: Engaging with people from different ethnic backgrounds helps develop empathy and perspective-taking skills. It allows individuals to put themselves in the shoes of others, understand their experiences, and appreciate their unique challenges and perspectives. This empathy promotes tolerance and understanding. 4. Building social cohesion: Ethnic diversity encourages the formation of social networks and relationships between individuals from different backgrounds. These connections facilitate cooperation, collaboration, and mutual support. As people work together towards common goals and build relationships, it strengthens social cohesion and fosters tolerance.

To know more about tolerance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30478622

#SPJ11

Answer:

Can you send the passage?

Explanation:

Answer:

1, Article 1 Legislatve

Explanation:

Congress is the Legislative Branch, therefore it is that. Also you literally can read the Constitution and find it

Answer:

The Great Depression had devastating effects in countries both rich and poor. Personal income, tax revenue, profits, and prices dropped, while international trade plunged by more than 50%. Unemployment in the U.S. rose to 25% and in some countries as high as 33%.

Answer:The Great Depression had devastating effects in countries both rich and poor. Personal income, tax revenue, profits, and prices dropped, while international trade plunged by more than 50%. Unemployment in the U.S. rose to 25% and in some countries as high as 33%.

Explanation:

Answer:

All of the choices are correct.

Explanation:

All of the choices are correct.

The German reunification was a complicated process, and its consequences can be felt to this day.

The former German Democratic Republic (East Germany) was much poorer than Western Germany, so much that even today, the German regions that belonged to East Germany are still poorer than their western counterparts.

Higher unemployment in East Germany was obviously a consequence of this economic disparity.

The release of the Stasi files was also controversial, and many people disagreed with it. The Stasi files revealed that the former German Democratic Republic had spied on its citizens in order to keep societal control.