Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
proposes that the War on Drugs began as an attempt to fight two enemies:
Answer:
The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people.
EXPLANATION:
Ehrlichman told journalist Dan Baum in 1994. "You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities."
The accusation was shocking, characterizing the war on drugs as a racist, politically motivated crusade.
But Ehrlichman's claim is likely an oversimplification, according to historians who have studied the period and Nixon's drug policies in particular. There's no doubt Nixon was racist, and historians told me that race could have (played one role in Nixon's drug war. But there are also signs that Nixon wasn't solely motivated by politics or race: For one, he personally despised drugs — to the point that it's not surprising he would want to rid the world of them. And there's evidence that Ehrlichman felt bitter and betrayed by Nixon after he spent time in prison over the Watergate scandal, so he may have lied.
More importantly, Nixon's drug policies did not focus on the kind of criminalization that Ehrlichman described. Instead, Nixon's drug war was largely a public health crusade — one that would be reshaped into the modern, punitive drug war we know today by later administrations, particularly President Ronald Reagan.
None of that means that the drug war hasn't disproportionately hurt black Americans. It clearly has. But the lessons of Nixon's drug policies may not be so much that he was a racist, power-hungry politician — although, again, he was — but rather that even well-meaning policies can have big, terrible unintended consequences.
Hope it helps! And please give me brainliest pleasse?
which crime listed below is not reported in part i or part ii of the offense section of the ucr?
Traffic violations is not reported in Part I or Part II of the offense section of the UCR. The right answer is c.
For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Programme produces accurate statistics. Crime in the US is measured using a variety of techniques. The first is frequently described as the official crime measure. The F.B.I.'s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) then compile these crime data and publish it.
Murder, severe assault, burglary, larceny/theft, and motor vehicle theft are all Part I offences under the UCR. All other criminal activity, including as prostitution and drug trafficking, falls under the category of Part II offences. The crimes that the police are aware of and for which an arrest has been made make up the UCR data. Finally, different states may have different definitions of crime.
The correct answer is option c.
Know more about UCR here
https://brainly.com/question/30273202
#SPJ4
The question seems incomplete. The complete question is:
Which crime listed below is not reported in Part I or Part II of the offense section of the UCR?
a. aggravated assault
b. burglary
c. traffic violations
d. vehicle theft
2. Alcohol is a factor in __________% of Florida crash costs.
A. 15
B. 20
C. 30
D. 40
Answer:
its B
Explanation:
25% of the expenses of crashes in Florida are related to drinking. In 2000, drinking-related crashes cost the general public in Florida an estimated $7.8 billion. Hence option B is correct .
What is AMERICA'S DRIVING DEFENSE ?Which included $3.5 billion in financial costs and about $4.3 billion in losses to quality of life. (See the definitions fact page for definitions of the cost categories.)
Accidents involving are deadlier and more serious than other accidents. $4.8 billion of the cost of the related crash was covered by parties other than the driver.
In Florida, there was a driver with a blood drinking content (BAC) >.08 for every 110 kilometres travelled in 2000. In Florida, police reported 23,578 in which the motorist or pedestrian had a BAC of.01 or above.
NHTSA developed formulas to estimate the number of Many accidents involving drinking when police did not report participation. Drinking is thought to have been a factor in 135,300 in Florida, 1,191 of which resulted in and 49,100 in injuries.
Learn more about Florida Crash here
https://brainly.com/question/16981279
#SPJ2
A) What three sentencing objectives is a judge supposed to downplay or minimize when they consider the accuse mental health as a mitigating factor?
b) What two objectives should the judge emphasize?
The sentencing objectives:
1. To denounce unlawful conduct
2. Specific deterrence & general deterrence
3. To separate dangerous offenders (think jail)
4. To rehabilitate offenders
5. To repair harms to victims and communities
6. To get offenders to acknowledge responsibility and the harm they have caused others
The fundamental purpose of sentencing is to contribute to the maintenance of a just, peaceful and safe society through the imposition of just sanctions. The court [shall/may] consider the following objectives in assessing the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon an offender: denouncing blameworthy behaviour.
You are researching Westward Expansion to California. Your first Internet search brings up too many unrelated topics. How can you narrow your search?
A.
search each word separately
B.
put quotation marks around the exact phrase
C.
first search on Westward Expansion, then on California, and see what sites come up on both searches
D.
add the word "narrow" to your search
Answer:
I think it is B
Explanation:
neeed points
What does “Checks and balances” mean when it comes to government. Give at least 2 examples of checks and balances amongst the branches of government.
Answer:
In terms of gov.t, Checks and Balances, which is the principle of government under which separate branches have the power to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power.
Explanation:
- 1st Example -
> The Judicial branch/Supreme court CHECKS on the Executive branch/President to make sure that the laws that they enforce is (Un)constitutional and would BALANCE the power it enforces.
- 2nd Example -
> The Legislative branch/Congress CHECKS on the Judicial branch/Supreme Court to make sure that they are doing their job on interpreting the laws to make the law (un)constitutional
.. I hope this helps ..
Were prosecutors influenced in their decision by Mayweather's wealth and fame? Did Mayweather benefit from hiring expensive, prominent attorneys to defend him?
What were two critical findings of the ABA survey of restitution directors?
Answer:
Findings from a study conducted by the American Bar Association (ABA), Improving Enforcement of Court-Ordered Restitution, suggest that higher compliance rates result: (1) when efforts are made to monitor payments, and (2) when consistent action is taken to respond to delinquencies.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
Anyone is in Dav school? Noida
Answer:
no
Explanation:
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
Every day someone complains on how the core system does not work I would like you to suggest three things that you think should be changed to the system why they should be changed and how that part of the system should work
Answer:
It’s been eight years since the Common Core State Standards were unveiled and states began adopting them for use in their evaluation programs. The firestorm of controversy which initially greeted their introduction into American education from both sides of the political aisle seems to have died down somewhat and presently the Common Core appears to have been accepted as a part of the landscape in most of the nation, even as a handful of states that have not adopted it have established similar sets of academic standards.
Which of the following groups would be particularly important to the success of a community policing
program?
religious leaders representing community churches, synagogues, and mosques
the Daughters of the American Revolution
the city Chamber of Commerce
the community garden club
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Elevate the following scenarios and determine which represents micha’s highest liability
A. Rose is lost and pulls her car into Micha's driveway for a moment to get her bearings. B. Oscar is a twelve-year-old neighbor of Micha's who has snuck into Micha's backyard to swim in his pool. C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates. D. Ron is Micha's friend whom Micha has invited to his home to watch the Super Bowl.
Answer:
C. Juanita is a customer having a latte in the coffee shop Micha owns and operates.
Explanation:
Micha is responsible for all the people in her cafeteria, as well as being responsible for the food security of her customers. For this reason, we can say that when Juanita enters Micha's cafeteria, she consumes her products, she becomes Micha's responsibility. The other scenarios shown in the question, do not have the direct responsibility of Micha, or do not require any responsibility from her, but from third parties.
a. Which underlying theory about the purpose of law do you feel makes most sense and why—consensus or conflict theory?
The consensus theory because all individuals have a say, not just the dominant class in power.
What is consensus theory?Consensus theory of law argues that the criminal justice system should work cooperatively to produce justice, as opposed to competitively. In this system, majority of citizens in a society share the same values and beliefs.
Unlike the conflict perspective, it does not suggest that the crime definitions to be controlled by those with wealth, power, and social position in society.
In the consensus model, criminal law is made for the benefit of the whole society.
Learn more about the consensus model here:-
https://brainly.com/question/8698180
#SPJ1
Is Hamlet killing Claudius justified?.
Even though Hamlet first believes that he should exact revenge, he states that his urge to meditate and that meditation may cause his thoughts of retaliation to disappear.
Why are Hamlet's actions justified?In the narrative, Hamlet learns that his father was murdered by his uncle and decides that he must exact retribution. A ghost of Hamlet's father informed Hamlet that he had been killed. Months after his father's passing, his mother wed Hamlet's uncle. Was Hamlet's behavior acceptable? He delayed obtaining revenge for a very long time and ultimately killed his uncle Claudius while also treating his mother terribly, which was the main cause of Ophelia's death. Except for getting even with Claudius, his acts were not justifiable.Even though Hamlet first believes that he should exact revenge, he states that his urge to meditate and that meditation may cause his thoughts of retaliation to disappear.To learn more about Hamlet, refer to
https://brainly.com/question/806658
#SPJ4
If you drive under the influence, you
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person.
B. Will have to pay double the fine if you’re ticketed for speeding.
C. Are less likely to be injured in a collision.
D. I’m not committing a crime unless your BAL is .08 or higher
Answer:
the answer is a.
Explanation:
cuz you still arent 100 pecent paying attwntion
Answer:
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person
Explanation:
While under the influence, you're not fully conscious or aware of your surroundings. That being said, driving is a task that acquires the driver to be conscious and to have awareness for their safety and the other driver's safety. If the driver is intoxicated, they risk a collision and killing people if the collison is deadly.
In practice, cyber information and misinformation are controlled by users and hosts, motivated mostly by their:
Ensure the authenticity and integrity of the information they supply, and preserve their data and privacy.
Which word best encapsulates integrity?Honesty, honor, and probity are a few words that frequently describe integrity. All of these terms refer to "uprightness of character or deed," but integrity implies trustworthiness and incorruptibility to the point that one is unable to be unfaithful to a trust, responsibility, or commitment.
What does integrity in the workplace look like?Be Willing to Work Hard
Another illustration of integrity in the job is when you are working while on business time; you aren't watching from the sidelines and demanding that others complete the task for you. Even individuals in prominent positions ought to be aware that if you are never willing to do some work yourself, you will lose the respect of your subordinates.
To know more about integrity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12881972
#SPJ1
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
To resolve a conflict, parties should continue discussing issues until they find the one, perfect solution.
True or False
False. Resolving a conflict does not necessarily require finding the one, perfect solution through continuous discussion.
Conflict resolution recognizes that perfect solutions may be difficult to attain, and instead focuses on finding a resolution that satisfies the needs and interests of all parties involved. This may involve trade-offs and reaching a middle ground that allows for a fair and equitable outcome.
Continuously discussing issues without flexibility or willingness to compromise can hinder the resolution process and perpetuate the conflict. It is important to consider different perspectives, actively listen to each other, and explore alternative solutions that meet the underlying needs of all parties involved. Successful conflict resolution often requires a collaborative and constructive approach, rather than a quest for a singular perfect solution.
To learn more about conflict click here, brainly.com/question/32663176
#SPJ11
The Start of Mexican American Gangs in LA', it is revealed that many Mexican immigrants had assimilated to American culture after the two World Wars. What did those who found it difficult to adapt call themselves?
In the context of Mexican American gangs in Los Angeles, those who found it difficult to adapt to American culture often referred to themselves as "pachucos" or "zoot suiters."
Pachucos were a subculture of Mexican American youth in the 1940s and 1950s who developed their own distinctive style, including wearing oversized zoot suits with wide-brimmed hats and flamboyant accessories.
The pachuco culture was seen as a way for young Mexican Americans to express their identity and assert their presence in a society that marginalized them. The term "pachuco" was later adopted by Mexican American gang members as a source of pride and camaraderie.
Learn more about American culture https://brainly.com/question/13720219
#SPJ11
what fiduciary duty does a producer owe his principal
A producer owes a fiduciary duty of loyalty to his principal.
This means that the producer has a legal and ethical obligation to act in the best interest of the principal and to put the principal's interests above his own.
The fiduciary duty of loyalty includes several specific obligations:
Duty of care: The producer must exercise reasonable care and diligence in carrying out his duties for the principal.Duty of obedience: The producer must follow the principal's instructions and act within the scope of his authority.Duty of disclosure: The producer must provide the principal with all information relevant to the principal's interests.Duty of confidentiality: The producer must keep confidential all information that is not relevant to the principal's interests.Duty of accounting: The producer must keep accurate and complete records of all transactions involving the principal's property or money.If a producer breaches his fiduciary duty of loyalty, he may be held liable for any losses or damages suffered by the principal as a result of the breach.
To know more about fiduciary duty click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/15198880#
#SPJ11
State 4 common characteristics of the 46 US presidents
Select the correct answer. Santiago is a new manager at a restaurant. He is creating a system to prevent deliberate food contamination using the ALERT tool. Which action should he take under the term "Look" in the program? A. hold any product suspected to be contaminated B. restrict access to prep and storage areas C. use approved suppliers, who practice good food defense D. train staff to spot food defense threats
Answer:
B. restrict access to prep and storage areas
Explanation:
'Santiago, inorder for him to prevent the food contamination, he would need to find a way to restrict access to preparation and storage areas in the restaurant. This is because, the higher the number of people has access to those areas, the high probability of the food to be contaminated by some of thse people either deliberately or not.
a state legislature recently enacted a statute forbidding public utilities regulated by the state's public service commission to increase their rates more than once every two years. a power company, a public utility regulated by that commission, has just obtained approval of the commission for a general rate increase. the power company has routinely filed for a rate increase every ten to 14 months during the last 20 years. because of uncertainties about future fuel prices, the power company cannot ascertain with any certainty the date when it will need a further rate increase; but it thinks it may need such an increase sometime within the next 18 months.
The correct option of this question is: (C) dismiss the complaint, because this action is not ripe for decision.
public utility, undertaking that gives specific classes of administrations to the public, including normal transporter transportation (transports, aircrafts, railways, engine cargo transporters, pipelines, and so on); phone and transmit; power, intensity, and light; and local area offices for water, sterilization, and comparable administrations. In many nations such endeavors are state-possessed and state-worked, however in the US they are mostly exclusive and are worked under close governmental regulation.
The exemplary clarification for the need to manage public utilities is that they are endeavors in which the innovation of creation, transmission, and dissemination unavoidably prompts total or fractional syndication — that they are, in an expression, natural monopolies.
to know more about monopoly click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7217942
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
The legislature of the state of Gray recently enacted a statute forbidding public utilities regulated by the Gray Public Service Commission to increase their rates more than once every two years. Economy Electric Power Company, a public utility regulated by that commission, has just obtained approval of the commission for a general rate increase. Economy Electric has routinely filed for a rate increase every ten to 14 months during the last 20 years. Because of uncertainties about future fuel prices, the power company cannot ascertain with any certainty the date when it will need a further rate increase; but it thinks it may need such an increase sometime within the next 18 months. Economy Electric files an action in the federal district court in Gray requesting a declaratory judgment that this new statute of Gray forbidding public utility rate increases more often than once every two years is unconstitutional. Assume no federal statute is relevant. In this case, the court should
(A) hold the statute unconstitutional, because such a moratorium on rate increases deprives utilities of their property without due process of law.
(B) hold the statute constitutional, because the judgment of a legislature on a matter involving economic regulation is entitled to great deference.
(C) dismiss the complaint, because this action is not ripe for decision.
(D) dismiss the complaint, because controversies over state regulated utility rates are outside of the jurisdiction conferred on federal courts by Article III of the Constitution.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
Which of the following factors can complicate analysis of post-mortem cooling
the victim's size
the victim's nationality
whether the victim is found face up or down
whether the victim had a heavy or light meal tast
Answer:
I think it would be the first one
Explanation:
If that doesn't work and you have another attempt then try the last one because I can't be to certain
The following factor can complicate analysis of post-mortem cooling is whether the victim is found face up or down. Thus option (c) is correct.
What is Post mortem cooling?
Algor mortis, the cooling of the body postmortem, is the result of a cessation in thermoregulation. As body temperature is controlled by the hypothalamus, this homeostatic feature can no longer be maintained after death.
Post mortem cooling of the body is one of the pertinent parameters in estimation of time since death during the early postmortem period.
Purpose of this is to analyze some of the existing methods, compare obtained results and determine which method gives more precise results of the estimation of time since death.
Learn more about postmortem cooling here:
https://brainly.com/question/2112396
#SPJ2
Postmortem changes refer to various processes that occur in a body after death producing a variety of effects. These changes can be divided into early and late time periods, the latter represented by decomposition, however the entire process represents a continuum.
What is infanticide
Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\
Have a nice day ✨What is a document called that is filed with the court to state the position of the plaintiff or the defendant in a lawsuit and ask for relief from the court?.
The document is called Pleadings.
What is a Lawsuit?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.
The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgment will be rendered in their favor, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.
To know more about Lawsuit, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ4
Which of the following is considered a social effect of a crime?
O Strained relationship with loves ones
Changes in sleeping and eating habits
Attempting to shut out the pain
Medical loss due to injury
Answer:
Stained relationship with love ones.
QUESTION 4
Malik and Zahara are neighbors involved in a boundary dispute. Malik sues Zahara, and Zahara receives written notice that Malik has
filed a lawsuit against her. Zahara has received
Oa an answer.
Oba default judgment.
4
What Zahara has received is C. a court summons.
What is a court summons?A court summons is an official notice of a lawsuit issued by a court to a person being sued.
The purpose of a summons is to notify the defendant about the court file and the date they are required to appear before the court.
Thus, what Zahara has received is a C. a court summons, not an answer or a default judgment.
Learn more about court summons at https://brainly.com/question/14436531
#SPJ1