Under the exclusionary rule, d. evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment will be excluded from a trial.
Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution will be excluded from a trial. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.
The exclusionary rule was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Weeks v. United States (1914) and was later extended to state courts through the case of Mapp v. Ohio (1961).
The rule holds that any evidence obtained by law enforcement officers through a search or seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment cannot be used as evidence against the defendant in a criminal trial.
The rationale behind the exclusionary rule is to deter law enforcement officers from engaging in unconstitutional searches and seizures.
By excluding evidence obtained through these means, the rule creates an incentive for officers to follow the Fourth Amendment and obtain evidence through lawful means.
To learn more about amendment, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
A trucking company has clients that require them to deliver goods all over the
country. The company hires employees who live in various states and assigns
them delivery routes that allow them to be home as much as possible. One of
the drivers lives in a different state from where the trucking company is
located and feels that he is being denied benefits because of this. The
company says that the laws of their state do not require what the employee is
requesting. If the driver decides to pursue a legal case, which of the following
would most likely be true?
A. It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ,
it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide.
B. The courts will likely end up requiring the governments of the two
states to change their laws so that they agree and do not
contradict one another.
C. The case would be heard in federal courts because the two parties
are from different states.
D. Because the driver is not from the same state as the company
itself, he is not allowed to bring a case against the company on
this matter.
It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ, it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide is most likely to happen.
What is something the state government is responsible for?Defending individuals from neighbourhood dangers. Keeping up the legal system. Establishing regional governmental entities like counties and towns. Upkeep of state roadways and establishment of methods for controlling local roads.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about state government is responsible for, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2117668
#SPJ1
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
____________ examples would implied consent not be legally appropriate.
Answer:
A patient agrees to a test for HIV
Explanation:
Why are “reasonable restrictions” allowed on freedom expression?
Reasonable restrictions include libel, slander, or speech which causes an immediate danger (yelling fire in a movie theatre that has no fire, yelling bomb in an airport) Freedom of speech is meant to protect opinions but various courts have upheld that they are still restrictions. This is primarily for safety and to ensure people can differentiate from opinions and things being communicated as fact.
Which constitutional amendment freed the slaves ?
Answer: 13th amendment to the US Constitution
Explanation:
A rubber balloon is blown up and released. It flies around the room as air is pushed out of the balloon. This is the best example of ___________.
a
Second law of motion
b
fourth law of motion
c
First law of motion
d
third law of motion
Answer:
it
third law of motion
Explanation:
what is medicare power of attorney
Answer:
A medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare. ... This allows an agent (a trusted friend or family member) to make important and necessary healthcare decisions if the individual becomes incapacitated or unable to communicate or participate in care.
Answer:
A medical power of attorney or medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare.
Explanation:
I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Lilac~
What are the general requirements and major impacts of the gdpr, and how does this law differ from data protection legislation in the united states?.
Answer:
Some of the key privacy and data protection requirements of the GDPR include: Requiring the consent of subjects for data processing. Anonymizing collected data to protect privacy. Providing data breach notifications.
Explanation:
\(\huge{\tt{\color{cyan}{Answer}}}\)
A defendant charged with conspiracy to commit murder requested a meeting with the prosecutor to discuss the defendant's cooperation. At the beginning of this pre-trial meeting, the prosecutor indicated that she would talk with the defendant only if the defendant agreed that statements made by the defendant during the meeting could be used to impeach the defendant's testimony if a plea deal could not be reached and the defendant chose to testify at trial. The defendant, after consulting with his attorney, knowingly and voluntarily agreed. No plea agreement was subsequently reached. At trial, the defendant testified. When the prosecutor attempted to impeach the defendant's testimony with statements that the defendant had made during the pre-trial meeting, the defendant's attorney objected. Should the court permit the prosecutor to ask the defendant about such statements?
Yes, The court should permit the prosecutor to ask the defendant about such statements.
Yes, as a result of the defendant's conscious and voluntary waiver of his right to have words he made during a plea agreement deleted. Federal Rule 410 prohibits the admission of statements made by defendants during plea discussions, although the defendant has the option of forgoing this protection. In this instance, the defendant renounced this exception voluntarily, consciously, and in the presence of counsel. A person who is being tried in court on charges of breaching the law is known as a defendant.
Learn more about defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/12441773
#SPJ4
Which of the following trade agreements is a binding agreement to reduce trade barriers between the United States and Mexico?
a. Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
b. World Trade Organization
c. European Union
d. North American Free Trade Agreement
e. Central America Free Trade Agreement
The USMCA, or United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement, is a trade pact between the three nations. The North American Free Trade Binding Agreement was superseded by the USMCA (NAFTA).
What was done by NAFTA?A free-trade area was established in North America when Canada, Mexico, and the United States signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1992. zone in North America. The majority of the items produced by the signing countries were immediately free of tariffs under NAFTA.
What is the USMCA's primary goal?The new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will encourage trade that benefits all three countries, resulting in more open markets, equitable trade, and strong economic growth in North America.
To know more about Binding Agreement visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29335454
#SPJ4
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
Question 9
The filibuster
Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
Judge
Grand jury
Prosecuting attorney
Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
Cabinet
White House Staff
Executive office of the president
Department of the InteriorTop of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A frequent annoyance
Weekly Ramblings
Fireside Chats
Happy times
The filibuster was seldom utilized all through a large portion of American history however has turned into a much of the time involved strategy in the U.S. Senate during the most recent 20 years. Option B is correct .
Filibusters became more common toward the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, prompting serious consideration of amending Senate rules to end the practice. At that point, the Senate had grown in size and became more active. Because of the amount of work that needed to be done each session, a senator who chose to filibuster might make it hard for the body to move forward and get concessions from senators who wanted to approve their measures.
10 : Grand jury is the role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a Judge , Option B is correct .
The federal criminal case prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, presents evidence to a grand jury. If there is "probable cause" to suspect the defendant of committing a crime, the grand jury decides whether a trial should be held.
11 : Chief office of the president is the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the Cabinet . Option C is correct .
The White House Office, the Public safety Gathering, the Committee of Monetary Counselors, and the Workplace of The board and Financial plan are the four associations that make up the Leader Office of the President , which gives the president guidance in significant approach regions.
12 : Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as Fireside chats . Option C is correct .
Throughout the 1930 s and 1940 s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave radio addresses that were referred to as "fireside chats." FDR gave radio broadcasts to calm the nation during a turbulent time and explain things in a way that most people could understand.
Learn more about filibuster :
brainly.com/question/29551874
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
The filibuster
A. Has never been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
B. Was rarely used throughout most American history but has become a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate during the last 20 years
C. Was a frequently used tactic in the U.S. throughout most of American history but has almost never been used during the last 20 years
D. Has always been a frequently used tactic in the U.S. Senate
Question 10
The role that the U.S. House of Representatives plays in impeachments can best be compared with that of a
A. Judge
B. Grand jury
C. Prosecuting attorney
D. Defense attorney
Question 11
The Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers are both parts of the
A. Cabinet
B. White House Staff
C. Executive office of the president
D. Department of the Interior Top of Form
Question 12
Franklin Roosevelt used radio broadcasts to build support for his policies. These broadcasts came to be known as
A. A frequent annoyance
B. Weekly Ramblings
C. Fireside Chats
D. Happy times
Please choose the term that best matches the definition: (1 mark each)
(Terms are listed at bottom of the question)
Question 1 options:
The maximum airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed at any time
A person who has charge of a workplace or authority over a worker
Must do – there is no option.
Any reprimand, penalty, or negative consequence imposed on an employee by an employer in response to the employee's exercise of OHS rights.
Established standards for the construction, renovation and change of use of structures.
An Ontario Statute that regulates the promotion of worker health and safety in most Ontario workplaces.
Any land, premises, location or thing at, upon, on or near which a worker works
A trustee, receiver, tenant, lessee or occupier of any lands or premises used as a workplace
A Federal Statute that regulates worker health and safety.
A condition that results from exposure in a workplace to a physical, chemical or biological agent to the extent that the health of the worker is impaired
The maximum airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed in any 15-minute period
Applied to a controlled product that discloses hazards associated with the product.
As Prescribed
A biological or chemical agent named or described in the regulations
The time-weighted average airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed in a work day or work week
A possible defence against charges whereby a defendant asserts that it took all reasonable steps to avoid the incident that provoked the charge
1.
Occupational Health and Safety Act
2.
Shall
3.
There is, or will be, detailed requirements in a regulation.
4.
Building Code
5.
Owner
6.
workplace
7.
Supervisor
8.
Reprisal
9.
STEL
10.
Due Diligence
11.
Canada Labour Code
12.
Occupational Illness
13.
TWA
14.
Hazardous Material
15.
Supplier label
16.
Ceiling (C)
The term that best matches the definition "The maximum airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed at any time" is "Ceiling (C)".
The term that best matches the definition "A person who has charge of a workplace or authority over a worker" is "Supervisor".
The term that best matches the definition "Any reprimand, penalty, or negative consequence imposed on an employee by an employer in response to the employee's exercise of OHS rights" is "Reprisal".
The term that best matches the definition "Established standards for the construction, renovation and change of use of structures" is "Building Code".
The term that best matches the definition "An Ontario Statute that regulates the promotion of worker health and safety in most Ontario workplaces" is "Occupational Health and Safety Act".
The term that best matches the definition "Any land, premises, location or thing at, upon, on or near which a worker works" is "workplace".
The term that best matches the definition "A trustee, receiver, tenant, lessee or occupier of any lands or premises used as a workplace" is "Owner".
The term that best matches the definition "A Federal Statute that regulates worker health and safety" is "Canada Labour Code".
The term that best matches the definition "A condition that results from exposure in a workplace to a physical, chemical or biological agent to the extent that the health of the worker is impaired" is "Occupational Illness".
The term that best matches the definition "The maximum airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed in any 15-minute period" is "STEL".
The term that best matches the definition "Applied to a controlled product that discloses hazards associated with the product" is "Supplier label".
The term that best matches the definition "A possible defence against charges whereby a defendant asserts that it took all reasonable steps to avoid the incident that provoked the charge" is "Due Diligence".
The term that best matches the definition "A biological or chemical agent named or described in the regulations" is "Hazardous Material".
The term that best matches the definition "The time-weighted average airborne concentration of a biological or chemical agent to which a worker may be exposed in a work day or work week" is "TWA".
The term that best matches the definition "There is, or will be, detailed requirements in a regulation" is "As Prescribed".
Learn more about chemical agent
https://brainly.com/question/29784732
#SPJ11
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution __________.
By judicial interpretation, the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution restricts the federal government.
The Due process Clause of the Fourteenth change is precisely like a similar provision within the 5th change, which best restricts the federal authorities. It states that no man or woman shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or assets without a due method of regulation.” typically, “due manner” refers to truthful strategies.
Delivered to cope with the racial discrimination continued via Black individuals who were recently emancipated from slavery, the amendment showed the rights and privileges of citizenship and, for the first time, assured all people equal protection beneath the legal guidelines.
Learn more about amendment here brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
Why is competition limited in an oligopoly?
In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:
Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.
Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.
Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.
Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.
Know more about oligopoly here:
https://brainly.com/question/29518761
#SPJ8
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when:.
An exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
What is exculpatory clause?An exculpatory clause is when someone or an organization is excused from liability from things like negligence or wrongdoing when faced with a lawsuit.
An example of exculpatory clause is when a venue print an exculpatory clause on tickets it sells for a concert, indicating that it is not responsible for personal injury caused by employees or others during the show.
Hence, an exculpatory clause is generally unenforceable when it attempts to exclude an international tort or gross negligence.
Learn more about exculpatory clause here : https://brainly.com/question/4631290
Write a response discussing the traumas that victims of crime experience and ways that these traumas might be best addressed.
Your response should be thorough and well written on 1 - 3 double-spaced pages.
Victims of crime experience a wide range of traumas, depending on the type of crime they experienced. Traumatic experiences can include physical injuries, psychological trauma, financial losses, and social stigma. No matter the type of crime, victims can experience lasting psychological effects, such as fear, anxiety, depression, and PTSD.
What are traumas?Generally, The best way to address the traumas experienced by victims of crime is to provide them with comprehensive support services. Victims should be offered counseling and psychological services to help them cope with their trauma. Counseling can help victims to process the event and to come to terms with the trauma they experienced. Victims may also benefit from group therapy, which can provide them with a supportive environment and a sense of community.
Victims should also be provided with financial assistance to help them recover from the losses associated with the crime. This can include reimbursement for medical bills, lost wages, and other costs associated with the crime. Financial assistance can help victims to rebuild their lives and to move forward after their traumatic experience.
Victims of crime should also be given access to legal advice and advocacy services. Having access to legal advice can help victims to understand their rights and to make informed decisions about their case. Advocacy services can provide victims
Read more about traumas
https://brainly.com/question/17986674
#SPJ1
Are voter ID laws racist? Why or why not?
Is critical race theory racist? Why or why not?
Please answer each question truthfully and to the best of your ability.
Please use facts to back up your answers.
Answer:
Explanation:
I do not have personal beliefs. I can provide information based on facts and expert opinions to help you understand the topics better.
Voter ID Laws:
There is ongoing debate and disagreement about the impact of voter ID laws on different racial groups. Proponents of voter ID laws argue that they are necessary to prevent election fraud and ensure the integrity of the voting process. Critics, however, argue that these laws can create barriers for some people, particularly those from communities of color, to exercise their right to vote. The impact of these laws can vary depending on the specifics of the law, the resources available to voters, and the implementation of the law.
Critical Race Theory:
Critical race theory is an intellectual movement and framework for examining the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression and power. It seeks to understand how laws and legal institutions have contributed to and perpetuated systemic racial inequality. Some individuals and groups have criticized critical race theory as promoting reverse racism and being divisive, while others see it as a necessary tool for understanding and combating the impacts of systemic racism in society.
It is important to note that the interpretation and application of critical race theory can vary, and the term can mean different things to different people. However, it is generally seen as a tool for examining and challenging the ways in which race and racism continue to shape society and the legal system, rather than a statement about the inherent characteristics of any particular race or group of people.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Gangs exist to provoke fear is this a true statement ,why or why not
A gang is a group of three or more individuals who come together to create a common identity and disseminate intimidation or fear.
What are the negative effects of gangs?Youth who are active in gangs are more likely to conduct crimes and be the victims of violence, which results in increased rates of arrest and incarceration. Teen parenthood, unemployment, and failure to complete high school are some effects of adolescent gang engagement.
What is the effect of gangs on society?Theft, adverse economic effects, vandalism, assault, gun violence, illegal drug trafficking, and homicide have a disproportionately detrimental impact on communities where there are active gangs.
To know more about Gangs visit: brainly.com/question/15874367
#SPJ1
All these poor teenagers in middle school i thought i wanted to go to middle school but i didnt, so my mom put me in homeschool, well flvs and i failled 3rd grade and my whole friend group was ahead of me and all the new friends i made were fake but so i have always wanted to graduate with my friend group soo this year i decided to do 7th and 8th, im finnished with 7th already (and im not smart) so im going into highschool next year with all my friends and ill be 15 im 14 now my birthday is the middle of august right AFTER school starts ,
so if you read this you might be thinking why? its a homework app but just really need ppl to talk to bc i am at home 24/7 bc i do school till like 12:00 at night and on the weekends and on the holidays so yeah im supprised im not 200 pounds.
Answer:
stay home jhit
Explanation:
does this experiment demonstrate the law of conservation of mass was formulated by lavoisier? explain your answer.
It is difficult to provide a definitive answer without having to know the specific experiment visitors are making reference to. I can, however, provide some background on the law of conservation of mass as well as Lavoisier's contributions to that too.
The law of conservation of mass would be a fundamental chemistry principle that stipulates that the mass of a closed system stays unchanged regardless of just about any chemical as well as physical modifications that take place within it. The latter means that even in chemical reactions, atoms are also not created and destroyed destroyed; rather, they are reorganized into different substances.
As a result, it's possible that the experiment you're referring to was one of Lavoisier's experiments demonstrating the law of conservation of mass. However, it is impossible to know for certain but without further information about just the specific experiment.
To know more about law of conservation of mass here:
https://brainly.com/question/28711001
#SPJ4
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
In an initiative, the source of the law is
the court
the voters.
the governor
the legislature
Answer: the voters
Explanation:
Answer:
IT'S B
Explanation:
In case of _, the death penalty was often used _ and seemed to be _ used based on _ and not the _ of the crime.
In case of serious crimes, the death penalty was often used excessively and seemed to be arbitrarily used based on the social status of the accused and not the severity of the crime.
For example, in some societies, the death penalty was used more often for crimes committed by the lower classes, while wealthy and powerful individuals were able to avoid punishment. Additionally, there were instances where the death penalty was used for minor crimes, such as stealing a loaf of bread to feed a starving family, rather than reserving it for the most heinous crimes like murder. This practice was often a result of flawed justice systems and corruption within the legal system. It highlights the need for reform and ensuring that the death penalty is used judiciously and only for the most severe crimes, regardless of social status or economic background.
to know about social status visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12510394
#SPJ11
A federal statute requires any individual or entity owning more than 100 cars to ensure that at least 10 percent of those cars are electric-powered. A city has sued the federal official responsible for enforcing this statute in federal district court, seeking an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the statute on the ground that it is unconstitutional. Should the court grant the injunction
It is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
The court would need to assess the constitutionality of the federal statute in question by considering relevant legal principles and constitutional provisions. One aspect that may come into play is the principle of federalism, which involves the division of powers between the federal government and the states. The court would evaluate whether the federal government has the authority to regulate car ownership and impose requirements on the percentage of electric-powered vehicles.
Additionally, the court would likely examine any constitutional challenges raised by the city, such as whether the statute infringes upon the city's rights or violates the principles of due process or equal protection. The city would need to provide compelling arguments and evidence to support its claim that the statute is unconstitutional.
Ultimately, the court's decision would be based on the interpretation of constitutional law and relevant legal precedents. It would consider the arguments presented by both parties and weigh the potential impact of granting or denying the injunction. Without further information on the specific legal arguments and evidence presented in the case, it is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
Learn more about injunction here:
https://brainly.com/question/23850251
#SPJ11
a key component of mediation is that the mediator generally does not have the power to issue a binding, final judgment on the parties.
True. A key component of mediation is that the mediator generally does not have the power to issue a binding, final judgment on the parties.
In the mediation process, a mediator who is an impartial third party helps the parties talk through and negotiate a resolution to their conflict. The mediator's role is to assist the parties in coming to a mutually agreeable conclusion rather than to enforce a resolution.
The mediator's main responsibility is to open lines of communication and assist the parties in identifying their core needs and interests. The parties themselves will ultimately decide how to resolve the conflict, despite the mediator's suggestions or recommendations. Instead than imposing a decision through the authority of the mediator or a court, the goal of mediation is to arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution that is voluntarily agreed to by the parties.
For such more question on mediation:
brainly.com/question/9096166
#SPJ4
The following question may be like this.
True or false: A key component of mediation is that the mediator generally does not have the power to issue a binding, final judgment on the parties.
It is possible to amend (or change) a bill in committee or on the floor during debate.
a. True
b. False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Senators may debate each amendment without limit unless the Senate (1) agrees to a motion ... the text of the bill; a second-degree amendment proposes to change the text of a first-degree The Senate then acts on the committee amendments, after amendment is numbered at the time it is offered and read on the floor.
you switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do
Answer:
I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die
Explanation:
Summarize the trial courts reason for ruling the Donald Myers was not insane at the time of the crime
In the case of Donald Myers, the trial court ruled that he was not insane at the time of the crime. The court reached this decision after reviewing the evidence and testimony presented during the trial.
In particular, the court noted that Myers had a history of mental illness and had previously been hospitalized for his condition. However, the court found that this did not necessarily mean that he was insane at the time of the crime. Instead, the court focused on the evidence regarding Myers' behavior leading up to and during the crime.
This evidence included testimony from witnesses who saw Myers behaving normally in the days and hours before the crime, as well as evidence that he had planned and carried out the crime in a deliberate and purposeful manner. Based on this evidence, the court concluded that Myers was not suffering from a mental illness that rendered him incapable of understanding the nature and consequences of his actions.
To know more about necessarily visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32679605
#SPJ11
as required by the texas law, please take a moment to answer following question before you can move on to the next section.
Almost option A. 4000 teens are killed by distracted or reckless driving in the United States.
What is a distracted driving?Distracted driving refers to any activity that diverts a person's attention away from driving, increasing the risk of an accident. Common examples of distracted driving include:
1. Texting or using a smartphone while driving
2. Talking on the phone, whether handheld or hands-free
3. Eating or drinking
4. Engaging with passengers
5. Using in-vehicle technologies, such as navigation systems or entertainment consoles
Reckless driving refers to a willful disregard for the safety of others on the road. It involves engaging in risky or aggressive behavior that can potentially cause harm to oneself or others, such as:
1. Excessive speeding or driving too fast for the conditions
2. Tailgating (following too closely)
3. Running red lights or stop signs
4. Changing lanes without signaling or in an unsafe manner
5. Racing or engaging in street racing
Both distracted driving and reckless driving pose significant risks and can lead to accidents, injuries, and fatalities on the road.
learn more about Reckless driving: https://brainly.com/question/30491381
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
As required by the Texas law, please take a moment to answer following question before you can move on to the next section.
Question 1 of 1
1. Almost...............teens are killed by distracted or reckless driving
h
O 4.000
1,500
2.000