an h field in free space is given as (x, t) = 10 cos(108 t − βx)ay a/m. find (a) β; (b) λ; (c) ε(x, t) at p(0.1, 0.2, 0.3) at t = 1 ns.

The image of the point (0,4) after a 180° counterclockwise rotation about the origin is (0, -4).

To find the image of a point (0,4) after a 180° counterclockwise rotation about the origin, we can follow these steps:

Therefore, the image of the point (0,4) after a 180° counterclockwise rotation about the origin is (0, -4).

By performing a 180° counterclockwise rotation, we essentially mirror the point across the origin, with the y-coordinate changing sign while the x-coordinate remains unchanged.

For such more question on counterclockwise:

https://brainly.com/question/28354740

#SPJ8

The profits for the given values of x are:

x = 10000, y = 6000;

x = 15000, y = 5750;

x = 20000, y = 5500;

x = 25000, y = 5250;

x = 30000, y = 5000.

We are given the equation:

\(y = -0.05x + 6500\)

where y represents the profits and x represents the amount in marketing dollars.

We are required to find the profits for the given values of x which are 10000, 15000, 20000, 25000 and 30000.

Profit (y) for x = 10000:

Substituting x = 10000 into the equation, we get:

\(y = -0.05(10000) + 6500\\= -500 + 6500\\= 6000\)

Therefore, the profit for x = 10000 is 6000.

Profit (y) for x = 15000:

Substituting x = 15000 into the equation, we get:

\(y = -0.05(15000) + 6500\\= -750 + 6500\\= 5750\)

Therefore, the profit for x = 15000 is 5750.

Profit (y) for x = 20000:

Substituting x = 20000 into the equation,

we get:

\(y = -0.05(20000) + 6500\\= -1000 + 6500\\= 5500\)

Therefore, the profit for x = 20000 is 5500.

Profit (y) for x = 25000:

Substituting x = 25000 into the equation, we get:

\(y = -0.05(25000) + 6500\\= -1250 + 6500\\= 5250\)

Therefore, the profit for x = 25000 is 5250.

Profit (y) for x = 30000:

Substituting x = 30000 into the equation, we get:

\(y = -0.05(30000) + 6500\\= -1500 + 6500\\= 5000\)

Therefore, the profit for x = 30000 is 5000.

The profits for the given values of x are:

x = 10000, y = 6000;

x = 15000, y = 5750;

x = 20000, y = 5500;

x = 25000, y = 5250;

x = 30000, y = 5000.

Hence, we are done with the given problem.

To know more about profits, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29987711

#SPJ11

first choice, I'm positive

Answer:

7.5 I guess?

Step-by-step explanation:

??

Step-by-step explanation:

l dont understand this can you explain

The statement that accurately describes the form of the sampling distribution is:The inspecting dissemination is regularly circulated with a mean of 37 and standard deviation 1.41.

According to the central limit theorem, regardless of how the population distribution is shaped, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normally distributed for a sufficiently large sample size.

For this situation, irregular examples of 32 are drawn from Meredith's patient populace, which fulfills the state of a sufficiently huge example size. The central limit theorem can be used to determine the sampling distribution's mean and standard error.

In this instance, the population mean, which is 37, is equal to the mean of the sampling distribution.

The population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size is the sampling distribution's standard error. For this situation, the standard mistake is 8 partitioned by the square foundation of 32, which is around 1.41.

Therefore, the statement that accurately describes the form of the sampling distribution is:

The inspecting dissemination is regularly circulated with a mean of 37 and standard deviation 1.41.

To know more about central limit theorem refer to

https://brainly.com/question/898534

#SPJ11

Answer:

-1

2

4

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to replace x with each number that is given, follow the order of operations, and then you have the correct y value.

a property has a back yard 125 x 150 feet and a side yard of 195 x 25 feet. then 23625  is the combined square footage of the side and back yard

125*150 and 195*25

total 23625

The area covered with grass, in square feet, is the area of the shape of the yard.

What is the Area of a Yard?

The area of a yard can be calculated by determining the shape of the yard, and using the appropriate area formula of the shape to find the area of the yard.

Image of the yard is missing. However, assuming the yard is a rectangular shape with a dimension of 10 ft by 6 ft, therefore:

The square feet of grass Russell has = area of rectangle = (10)(6) = 60 ft²

In summary, the area covered with grass, in square feeet, is the area of the shape of the yard.

a property has a back yard 125 x 150 feet and a side yard of 195 x 25 feet. then 23625  is the combined square footage of the side and back yard

Learn more about square  on:

brainly.com/question/854971

#SPJ4

\(\text{Hello There!}\)

\(\text{You are adding and subtracting for this equation.}\)

\(\text{$500-160=340}\)

\(\text{Since 340 is a factor of 20}\)

\(\text{You add +20 until you get 340.}\)

\(\text{20}\times{17=340}\)

\(\text{So your answer is going to be}\)

\(\huge\text{17}\)

\(\rule{250}{1.5}\)

Answer:

17

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The set of points that lie in the mix of the shaded colors are the solutions to the inequalities.

Those points are,

(0,-6)

(-14,-15)

(-9,-10)

Answer:

Hey girly the answer is def 0,12 xoxoxo ;)

Answer:

1. $1.2

2.  $0.14

Step-by-step explanation:

Step one:

given data

Black beans last week that cost $1.34

Step two:

This week's price

5 cans of beans cost $6.00

The cost per can is

= 6/5

=$1.2

The difference in price

=1.34-1.2

= $0.14

Answer: bro just look it up fr fr

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression that is equivalent to (2x + 3)/4 is: A. x/2 + 3/4.

Express the given expressions in their simplest form to determine the expression that is equivalent to (2x + 3)/4.

A. x/2 + 3/4

Find the common denominator. The common denominator is 4. Therefore:

=  2(x) + 1(3)/4

= (2x + 3)/4

x/2 + 3/4 ≠ (2x + 3)/4

Thus, the expression, x/2 + 3/4 is equivalent to (2x + 3)/4.

B. x/2 - 3/4 = (2x - 3)/4

Therefore, x/2 - 3/4 ≠ (2x + 3)/4

C. 3x/4 + 3/4 = (3x + 3)/4

Therefore, 3x/4 + 3/4 ≠ (2x + 3)/4

D. 8x + 24 ≠ (2x + 3)/4

Therefore, 8x + 24 ≠ (2x + 3)/4

In summary, we can conclude that, the expressions, x/2 - 3/4, 3x/4 + 3/4, and 8x +24x/2 + 3/4 is not equivalent to (2x + 3)/4. Thus, the expression that is equivalent to (2x + 3)/4 is: A. x/2 + 3/4.

Learn more about equivalent expressions on:

https://brainly.com/question/22365614

#SPJ1

Answer:

lower: 8 higher: 15

Step-by-step explanation:

100-36=64

sqrt(64=8

289-64=225

sqrt(225)=15

Answer:

its 19 ur welcome byeeee

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Imao 5

Step-by-step explanation:

just divide

Answer:

5 cups.

Step-by-step explanation:

The egg to flour ratio is 7:35

If you narrow it down, it is 1:5

You have to divide it.

To find the limit of the given function, we need to approach the point (0, 0) along different paths and check if the limit exists and if it is the same along all the paths. Let's consider the limit along the x-axis first, i.e., when y = 0. In this case, the function reduces to lim (x, 0)→(0, 0) 0 = 0.

Now, let's consider the limit along the y-axis, i.e., when x = 0. In this case, the function reduces to lim (0, y)→(0, 0) 0 = 0. So far, it seems like the limit exists and is equal to 0. However, let's now consider the limit along the curve y = x. In this case, the function reduces to lim (x, x)→(0, 0) x^3 cos(x) / (6x^4) = cos(0)/6 = 1/6. Since the limit is different along this path, we can conclude that the limit does not exist. Therefore, the answer is "dne."

To know more about Limit visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29795597

#SPJ11

Answer: -1000 could represent the amount of money someone owes to a bank, or has taken out of their bank account. For example, if someone were to be in dept of -1000 dollars to the bank if they took out a loan of $1000 that they never paid back. Or, if someone were to withdraw that amount from their account to spend on something else.

Hope this helps!

The given differential equation is: y'' − 14y' + 40y = 0. To find the two values of k for which y(x) = ekx is a solution of the differential equation, we first differentiate y(x) twice. We get y'(x) = ekxk and y''(x) = ekxk2. Now we substitute these values in the differential equation and get;ekxk2 − 14ekxk + 40ekxk = 0ekxk [k2 − 14k + 40] = 0k2 − 14k + 40 = 0Solving this quadratic equation gives us;k = 7 ± √9.

The two values of k are; Smaller value = 7 − √9Larger value = 7 + √9Now we need to simplify this further. We know that √9 = 3Therefore,Smaller value = 7 − 3 = 4Larger value = 7 + 3 = 10Therefore, the two values of k for which y(x) = ekx is a solution of the differential equation y'' − 14y' + 40y = 0 are 4 and 10. The smaller value is 4 and the larger value is 10.

To know more about differential equation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235

#SPJ11

Answer:

its definetly 1/2 but i cant see the numbers but i had this question like 2 minutes ago

Step-by-step explanation:

nice to help a high schooler, make you think how hard high school will be

Answer:

2.15

Step-by-step explanation:

I will assume that "−1/4(−8.6)" is telling us to multiply (-8.6) times -(1/4):

(-1/4)*(-8.6)

= (8.6/4)

= 2.15

89% of pebbles weigh more than 2.1 grams.

What is a percentage?

Given,

         Mean = 2.6

           SD = 0.4

As we have to find the percentage of pebbles weighing more than 2.1, we have to find the z-score for 2.1 first.

             \(z = \frac{x- mean}{SD}\)

             \(z = \frac{2.1 - 2.6}{0.4}\)

             \(z = -1.25\)

Now we have to use the z-score table to find the percentage of pebbles weighing less than 2.1

So,

   \(P ( x < 1.25 ) = 0.10565\)

This gives us the probability of P(z<-1.25) or P(x<2.1)

To find the probability of pebbles weighing more than 2.1

\(P ( x > 2.1 ) = 1 - P( x < 2.1 ) = 1 - 0.10565 = 0.89435\)

Converting into percentage

0.89435 × 100 = 89.435 %

Rounding off to nearest percent   =89%

Therefore, 89% of pebbles weigh more than 2.1 grams.

Learn more about percent

brainly.com/question/4546769

#SPJ4

The equilibrium level of income (Y), interest rate (i), consumption (C), investments (I), and budget surplus can be calculated using the given equations and information. When G increases by 100, the new values for investments and budget surplus can be determined. The crowding out effect resulting from the increase in G can also be evaluated. Additionally, if the increase in G is accompanied by an increase in M/P by 100, the equilibrium level of Y and r, as well as the crowding out effect, can be determined and explained.

To calculate the equilibrium level of income (Y), we set the total income (Y) equal to total expenditures (C + I + G), solve the equation, and find the value of Y that satisfies it. Similarly, the equilibrium interest rate (i) can be determined by equating the demand for money (L) with the money supply (M/P). Consumption (C), investments (I), and budget surplus can be calculated using the respective equations provided.

When G increases by 100, we can recalculate the new values for investments and budget surplus by substituting the updated value of G into the equation. The crowding out effect can be assessed by comparing the initial and new values of investments.

If the increase in G is accompanied by an increase in M/P by 100, the equilibrium level of Y and r can be calculated by simultaneously solving the equations for total income (Y) and the interest rate (i). The crowding out effect in this case refers to the reduction in investments resulting from the increase in government spending (G) and its impact on the interest rate (r), which influences private sector investment decisions.

Overall, by analyzing the given equations and their relationships, we can determine the equilibrium levels of various economic variables, evaluate the effects of changes in government spending, and understand the concept of crowding out.

Learn more about: Equilibrium

brainly.com/question/30694482

#SPJ11

For a standard normal distribution, a negative value of z indicates that the observed value is below the mean of the distribution.

In a standard normal distribution, which has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1, a negative value of z indicates that the observed value is located below the mean. The z-score represents the number of standard deviations a data point is away from the mean.

A negative z-score means that the observed value is lower than the mean, indicating that it falls to the left of the center of the distribution. This means that the data point is relatively lower compared to the average and can provide information about its position within the distribution and its deviation from the mean.

To know more about negative , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29250011#

#SPJ11

Answer:

how can you mato someone brainlI

est

Answer:

Part A: \(\frac{3}{5}\)

Part B: \(\frac{1}{2}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that Alinn flipped a coin 20 times, and that 12 of those times resulted in heads. The other 8 times resulted in tails.

Part A wants us to find the experimental probability of the coin landing on heads. Experimental probability is the probability determined based on the experiments performed.

Part B wants us to find the theoretical probability of the coin landing on heads. Theoretical probability is determined based on the number of favorable outcomes over the number of possible outcomes.

Experimental probability is determined as # of times something occurred experimentally / total number of times.  

Since 12 of the 20 times that Alinn flipped the coin resulted in heads, this means that the experimental probability of Alinn flipping heads is \(\frac{12}{20}\), which simplifies down to \(\frac{3}{5}\).

Theoretical probability, as stated above, is the number of favorable outcomes / possible outcomes.

Our favorable outcome is flipping heads, and on a coin, there are two sides that a coin can land on: heads and tails. This means that there are two possible outcomes, and only one of them is favorable.

This means that our theoretical probability is \(\frac{1}{2}\).

The expression that represents the area of the rug after the expansion by x units on all four sides is:

(A + 2x) × (B + 2x), where A and B are the original length and width of the rug respectively.

The area of the rectangular rug before the expansion is given by A × B, where A and B are the length and width of the rug respectively.

After the expansion of x units on all four sides, the length and width of the rug become (A + 2x) and (B + 2x) respectively.

Therefore, the area of the rug after the expansion is:

(A + 2x) × (B + 2x)

= AB + 2Ax + 2Bx + 4x^2 (using FOIL method)

= AB + 2x(A + B) + 4x^2

Thus, the expression that represents the area of the rug after the expansion is (A + 2x) × (B + 2x).

For more questions like Area click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ11

Answer:

$0.56

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost of 3 1/3 pounds of beef at $1.35 per pound

= 3 1/3 × 1.35

= 10/3 × 1.35

= $4.5

He divides the meat into 8 equal packages. To the nearest cent, the price of each package is $

= $4.5 / 8

= $0.5625

Approximately $0.56 to the nearest cent

Answer:

A) y = x^2 -1

B) -y = 2x^2 +1  We multiply B) by -1

B) y = -2x^2 -1

We can then say x^2 -1 = -2x^2 -1

3 x^2 = 0

x = 0

************* Double-Check: ******************

Equation A) y = -1 and

Equation B) y = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

A multiplier of 1.2 means the value is multiplied or increased by a factor of 1.2.

A multiplier is a term used to represent a factor by which a value is multiplied or increased. It is a numeric value that indicates the extent of the increase or expansion of a given quantity. Multiplication by a multiplier results in scaling or changing the magnitude of the original value.

A multiplier of 1.2 indicates that a value will be increased by 20% or multiplied by a factor of 1.2. This means that when the multiplier is applied to the original value, the resulting value will be 1.2 times the original.

Read more about multipliers:

brainly.com/question/15883095