what is the example of red lie?
red lie are lies to harm others
Explanation:
example:
Danice: Mr William Jake took your phone and smashed it on the ground
Mr William: What?
* Then Mr William argued with Jake and scolded him so therefore Danice told a red lie*
Hope it helps
A claim made with full knowledge that the opposing person already knows it to be untrue.
What is a red lie?Red lies are just about retaliation and spite. The desire to hurt others, regardless at the cost of one's own harm, drives them. "A brilliant red lie" refers to a complete fabrication or something wholly at variance with the truth. The phrase "a red stranger" is another way we describe an individual who is a complete stranger.
An example of a red lie will is:
Even though you detest the meatloaf, you proclaim to your mother that it is excellent. You do not wish to tell her buddy that she's gained a significant amount of weight and appears heavy, so you respond as she asks saying he doesn't look big in her dress. In this, there is a red lie that is presented.
Learn more about red lie, here:
https://brainly.com/question/25427223
#SPJ2
the supremacy clause establishes that state laws will prevail over conflicting federal laws.
The statement that 'state laws will prevail over conflicting federal laws' is actually the opposite of what the Supremacy Clause establishes. The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal laws and the United States Constitution are the supreme law of the land, meaning that they take precedence over conflicting state laws.
What is the Supremacy Clause? The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the United States Constitution that establishes the authority of federal laws over state laws. It is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution and reads: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
This clause ensures that federal laws and the Constitution take precedence over conflicting state laws and constitutions, and that state judges are bound to uphold federal law over state law in the event of a conflict.
Thus, the statement that state laws will prevail over conflicting federal laws is not true.
Learn more about Supremacy Clause at: https://brainly.com/question/2306140
#SPJ11
What agency(ies) and regulation(s) govern advertising of consumer products such as bottled water? What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising? What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations (students should use their own state of residence regulations) around consumer products and services? What recommendations would you offer that comply with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
The government agency that regulates advertising of consumer products such as bottled water is the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration.
What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising?
The purpose is that companies really and truthfully inform American consumers over the components of the food or medicines they are about to take. It is of the utmost importance that the American people are informed and protected when they are consuming food or medicines, so they know what they are having.
What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations around consumer products and services?
FDA has the power to enforce its regulations nationwide. If companies do not comply, the FDA can enforce the regulations and companies have to pay fines from 100,000 to more than 250,000 dollars.
What recommendations would you offer that complies with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
My recommendation is that companies are honest when making advertisements to promote their products. Many times, companies lie to attract more consumers to defeat their competitors, cheating the people on some benefits that are not true.
That is not honest or ethical.
Clear communication and honesty is my best advice.
what is one important thing for a person with power of attorney to know?
A. Where Important legal documents are kept
B. What the law is regarding end-of-life decisions
C. Who else was considered to have power of attorney
D. why they were chosen to have power of attorney
Answer:
Answer would be B. What the law is regarding end-of-life decisions.
Answer:
A. Where important legal documents are kept.
Explanation:
:)
A 17-year-old contracts to buy his neighbor’s car. The neighbor is 18-years- old.
a. Is there a contract?
b. Was it breached if the neighbor sells it to someone else for $100 more?
knowledge of contract formation and defenses, please review the following scenarios and state whether there is a valid contract, (i.e., an offer, acceptance and consideration)
Answer:
Was it breached if the neighbor sells it to someone else for $100 more?
malicious shrinkers referes to losses that occur while companies
Malicious shrinkers refers to losses that occur while companies are in the process of shipping products to customers, and the products shrink in size or weight due to deliberate tampering or theft.
What is malicious shrinkers?This can result in the company delivering less product than was originally intended, leading to financial losses and potential harm to customer relationships. The term "malicious shrinkage" is often used to distinguish this type of loss from other forms of shrinkage, such as accidental damage or spoilage.
Malicious shrinkage is a common problem in industries where high-value or easily sellable products are shipped, such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, or luxury goods.
Learn more about malicious shrinkers at https://brainly.com/question/31579800
#SPJ1
what statment is true regarding a variable whjole life policy
A variable whole life policy is a type of life insurance that provides a death benefit to beneficiaries and also includes an investment component.
A variable whole life policy combines the elements of life insurance and investment. When an individual purchases a variable whole life policy, they pay regular premiums into the policy, which are then invested in different investment options chosen by the policyholder.
These investment options are typically managed by professional fund managers and can include stocks, bonds, or mutual funds. The policyholder has the flexibility to allocate their premiums among these investment options based on their risk tolerance and investment goals.
The cash value of a variable whole life policy can increase or decrease based on the performance of the underlying investments. If the investments perform well, the cash value of the policy can grow at a higher rate, allowing policyholders to accumulate more savings over time.
On the other hand, if the investments perform poorly, the cash value of the policy can decrease, potentially resulting in a lower death benefit or even a lapse of the policy if the cash value depletes.
Learn more about investments here: brainly.com/question/10908938
#SPJ11
What is the cost/benefit analysis that is used to help make decisions?
statutes in many states have permitted a person who has a claim against another to give up, or , his or her claim without an exchange of by making a written statement to that effect.
The type of legal provision that allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect, is known as a release or a waiver.
A release or waiver is a legal clause that enables people to freely give up or abandon their claims against other people without expecting anything in return. This clause gives people the option to expressly waive their right to file a lawsuit or request compensation for a specific claim or incident in a written statement.
People acknowledge that they have voluntarily and knowingly chosen to waive their rights by signing a release or waiver which exonerates the other party from any liability or responsibility related to the claim. This legal tool is frequently employed in a variety of situations including liability waivers for taking part in particular activities or events, contract negotiations and personal injury settlements.
To know more about waiver here
brainly.com/question/31838925
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which type of legal provision allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect?"
Since the 19th Century the power of the federal government relative to the state governments has:
Select one:
a. increased
b. decreased
c. remained constant
Since the 19th century, the power of the federal government relative to the state governments in the United States has increased.
Over the course of American history, there has been a notable shift toward the expansion of federal power. This shift can be attributed to various factors, including the interpretation of the Constitution by the federal courts, the exercise of authority by the federal government during times of crisis such as war or economic instability, and the enactment of legislation that grants the federal government broader jurisdiction in areas such as civil rights, social welfare, and commerce.
These developments have resulted in the federal government assuming a more dominant role in policymaking and governance, often superseding or preempting state laws and regulations.
However, it is important to note that the balance of power between the federal and state governments is a dynamic and evolving aspect of American federalism, with fluctuations occurring in response to political, social, and legal dynamics.
To learn more about federal government click here brainly.com/question/24049224
#SPJ11
in deciding whether a contract was formed, the courts look to the subjective intent of the parties. a. true b. false
The courts consider the subjective intention of the parties when determining whether or not a contract was formed. This statement is False.
whether a contract exists based on a subjective or objective standard?
The objective standard test governs terms and conditions, which asks if a reasonable person observing the interaction would surmise that an acceptance and an offer had occurred.
Which of the four considerations is taken into account by courts in evaluating whether an argument is a term or solely a depiction?
The rule of parol evidence
A court's starting point in deciding whether a written term is a term or a misrepresentation is that it is a term and the only term.
To know more about parol evidence click here brainly.com/question/29679663
#SPJ4
What term refers to evidence that exonerates or diminishes the defendants liability?
For the most part, changes in insanity law can result from the public's reaction to high-profile criminal cases involving individuals who are deemed legally insane. These cases often draw significant media attention and public scrutiny, leading to debates and discussions about the appropriate treatment and legal consequences for individuals with mental illnesses who commit crimes.
When a high-profile case involving an individual with a mental illness emerges, it can influence public perception, shape public opinion, and spark calls for changes in insanity laws. Public reactions to such cases can vary, ranging from demands for stricter accountability and harsher penalties to calls for improved mental health care, treatment, and rehabilitation.
The public's reaction to these cases can influence policymakers, legislators, and legal experts to reevaluate and potentially modify existing insanity laws. Public sentiment and perceptions of fairness, justice, and public safety play a significant role in shaping the legal framework surrounding insanity defense and the treatment of mentally ill individuals within the criminal justice system.
It's important to note that changes in insanity laws can also be influenced by expert opinions, scientific advancements in the field of mental health, legal precedents, and constitutional considerations. However, public opinion and societal attitudes often play a significant role in shaping the discourse and eventual changes in insanity laws.
To know more about rehabilitation refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1184060#
#SPJ11
How does use of cargo containers benefit the economy?
Answer:
The use of cargo containers benefit the economy by keeping distribution costs low.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
What has been one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech? A) fewwe cases involving minors, B) fewer laws limiting minority rights. ,C) a more accurate election, D) a more informed society
Answer:
D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.
The Constitution gives each branch of government a different role in policy making in the United States. This sharing of responsibility by our government is known as ______.
In the United States, the Constitution assigns each branch of government a distinct duty in formulating public policy. Separation of powers is the term used to describe how our system distributes responsibility.
What are Separation of powers?The term "separation of powers" refers to the partition of a state's government into "branches," each having their own autonomous powers and responsibilities, to ensure that the authority of one branch does not conflict with that of the other branches. In order to prevent one branch of government from carrying out the primary duties of another, the term "separation of powers" refers to the division of governmental responsibilities into various branches. Checks and balances are intended to prevent the concentration of power. The U.S. Federal Government is divided into the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to ensure a balance of power. Each arm of government has its own authority and duties, including cooperating with other branches, to ensure that the government is effective and that individuals' rights are respected.To learn more about Separation of powers, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18453855
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
With a Class E license, if you're 17 years old, you may NOT drive between _____, except when driving to or from work, or when accompanied by a licensed driver age 21 or older.
A. 12 a.m. and 6 a.m.
B. 12 a.m. and 4 a.m.
C. 1 a.m. and 7 a.m.
D. 1 a.m. and 5 a.m.
Answer:
its D 1am and 5am
Explanation:
Legal insanity is a state of contractual _____, as determined by law.
A.incapacity
B.mistake
C.nullification
D.confusion
E.misunderstanding
Legal insanity is a state of contractual incapacity, as determined by law. This means that individuals who are legally insane are unable to enter into a valid bdue to their mental condition.
The law recognizes that such individuals lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions, and therefore, any contracts entered into by them are considered null and void.
Contractual incapacity due to legal insanity is an important concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals who are not capable of making rational decisions are not bound by agreements that they may not have understood or intended to enter into. The determination of legal insanity is typically made by a court of law, and may involve an assessment of the individual's mental health and ability to understand the nature of the contract.
It is important to note that legal insanity is not the same as a mistake, nullification, confusion, or misunderstanding. While these concepts may also render a contract invalid, they are not necessarily tied to an individual's mental health or capacity. Legal insanity is a specific legal concept that recognizes the limitations of individuals who are unable to make rational decisions due to their mental state, and seeks to protect them from entering into contracts that may be detrimental to their well-being.
To know more about legal insanity
https://brainly.com/question/31445937
#SPJ11
La follette believed that three groups of people should help politicians draft laws. Whom did he want to include? check all of the boxes that apply.
La Follette believed that three groups of people should help politicians draft laws: the general public, experts in the field, and people with first-hand experience.
He wanted to include the general public because he believed that they should have a say in the laws that affect them. He also wanted to include experts in the field because he believed that, they could provide valuable insights into the potential impacts of a proposed law. Finally, he wanted to include people with first-hand experience because he believed that they could provide valuable insights into the real-world impacts of a proposed law.
Learn more about law at : https://brainly.com/question/4133756
#SPJ4
______ is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
The power of judicial review is defined as the power to declare a government action unconstitutional, and is one of the oldest and perhaps most important responsibilities of the judicial branch.
Constitutionality is defined as the state of being in line with the laws or provisions of the applicable constitution;[1] it is also the status of a legislation, a procedure, or an act being in conformity with those laws or provisions. They are unconstitutional when policies, practices, or actions directly contravene the constitution. Unless a government has a system in place for declaring legislation unlawful, all other laws are regarded as constitutional.
A measure passed as law by the national legislature or a lower-level legislature, like the legislature of a state or province, may be ruled to be unconstitutional. The constitution, which is the document that defines the government, also contains laws that must be upheld by governments.
Learn more about judicial branch here
https://brainly.com/question/9696040
#SPJ4
Maurice Lamont Davis and Andre Levon Glover "committed a string of gas station robberies in Texas." The federal government charged both of them "with multiple counts of robbery affecting interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act" under 18 U.S.C. §1951(a). They were also charged with "one count of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery." The jury found the defendants guilty on most of the counts. The federal government also charged the men under §924(c). Section 924(c)(1)(A) states:
. . . [A]ny person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime . . . for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime—(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years; (ii) if the firearm is brandished, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 7 years; and (iii) if the firearm is discharged, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years.
. . . [A]ny person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime . . . for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime—(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years; (ii) if the firearm is brandished, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 7 years; and (iii) if the firearm is discharged, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years.
Under the section certain weapons also trigger increased penalties. "[T]he government argued that Mr. Davis and Mr. Glover had each committed two separate §924(c) violations by brandishing a short-barreled shotgun in connection with their crimes." The jury agreed with the argument on the additional violations. "Adding the §924(c) mandatory minimums to its discretionary sentences for their other crimes, the district court ultimately sentenced Mr. Glover to more than 41 years in prison and Mr. Davis to more than 50 years."
Assume that Glover and Davis file an appeal in your court.
1. In the U.S. legal system, courts can declare statutes unconstitutional if the statute is vague. Is §924(c)(3) unconstitutionally vague? How would you decide this case? Explain your answer.
2. What problems does it cause when statutes are too vague? Explain your answer.
3. If it is unconstitutionally vague, which branch of government is responsible for correcting it? Explain your answer.
[See United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019).]
1. In the United States legal system, courts can declare statutes unconstitutional if the statute is vague. §924(c)(3) is unconstitutionally vague.
I would decide this case in favor of Glover and Davis.The lower court erred in finding §924(c)(3) to be unconstitutionally vague. However, after careful consideration, the Supreme Court found that §924(c)(3) was unconstitutionally vague because it failed to provide a fair warning of what conduct would be considered a violation of the statute.2. When statutes are too vague, they cause problems in the legal system. One of the problems is that vague statutes are susceptible to arbitrary enforcement, which can result in inconsistent and unpredictable applications. Additionally, vague statutes may not provide adequate notice to individuals about what conduct is prohibited, which can lead to confusion and unjust prosecution.3. If it is unconstitutionally vague, the judicial branch of government is responsible for correcting it. The Supreme Court has the authority to interpret and strike down statutes that it finds to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), is an example of the Court exercising its power to declare a statute unconstitutionally vague and correct the issue.
To know more about government , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ11
is there legal harm suffered by marbury? is there a remedy at law? can the supreme court do anything? what is the power of the court?
First, it is important to understand that Marbury did suffer legal harm in the case of Marbury v. Madison. Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to serve as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, but his commission was not delivered before Adams left office.
Second, there is a remedy at law for Marbury's legal harm. Marbury could have filed a writ of mandamus, which would have ordered Madison to deliver the commission. However, the Supreme Court ultimately found that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which allowed for such writs to be filed directly to the Supreme Court, was unconstitutional. Therefore, Marbury was not able to obtain his remedy through the legal system.
Third, despite the fact that the Supreme Court could not provide a remedy for Marbury in this particular case, it is important to understand the power of the court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts. Additionally, the Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which means that it can declare acts of Congress or the President unconstitutional. This power is what allowed the Supreme Court to declare the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
To know more about Court visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ11
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
true or false: most industrialized countries have a single court system, with courts that have the power to hear both local and national cases.
This statement is true. Most industrialized countries have single court system or also known as unified court system. The courts in these countries have the power to hear both local and national cases.
A unified court system or single court system also attempts to address some issues that are related to the overabundance of courts at the local level.
Legal scholars argued that a centralized administration and judiciary system would effectively streamline the ability to preside over legal matters in the early 20th century. They called for an end to the fragmentation of court systems. Consequently, a unified or single court system emerged.
These court systems were typically created by local residents to supervise and carry out verdicts in local rather than national cases.
Find out what is not a level of court that exists in a unified court system: https://brainly.com/question/2710612
#SPJ4
I need some to help me write a 150 pages essay about this topic regarding the Participants of crime portfolio
Answer:
hey look up essaytyper.com and they'll create you an essay if you enter your topic
Telephone translator systems that provide translation services in many spoken languages are rare.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP!! 100 POINTS!!
Read the quote by John F. Kennedy and answer the following question.
"My fellow Americans ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"
-John F. Kennedy
Which of the following is a responsibility to which John F. Kennedy could be referring to?
- jury duty
- obeying laws
- volunteering for a charity
- register for selective service
Under which condition should I guess a guests ID be rechecked
The condition in which a person should have a guests ID rechecked is:
If the guest appears to be younger than his ID says.What is Safe Alcohol Awareness?This refers to the procedures which are put in place to ensure that an underaged person does not purchase or consume alcohol.
With this in mind, if a guest submits an Identification Card to show that he is eligible for buying a drink at a bar(for instance), then it is the responsibility of the bartender or whoever is in charge to double check the ID if the person appears to be underage.
Read more about alcohol use here:
https://brainly.com/question/17449396
the 1916 keating-owen act was the first federal law regulating
The 1916 Keating-Owen Act was the first federal law that regulated child labor. This act prohibited the employment of children under the age of 14 years in any factory producing goods for interstate commerce. This law sought to improve the working conditions of children in America's industrial sector.
Child labor was rampant in the early 20th century as families sent their children to work in factories and mills for long hours and little pay. The Keating-Owen Act was one of many progressive-era reforms that aimed to address the problems created by child labor.The Act was eventually overturned by the Supreme Court, which ruled that the federal government did not have the power to regulate intrastate commerce. However, it laid the groundwork for future labor laws that would protect the rights of children and ensure that they were not exploited in the workforce. Today, child labor is illegal in the United States, and children are afforded certain protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
To know more about Child labor visit-
brainly.com/question/30879555
#SPJ11
how did the roberts court rule in favor of business
Answer:
Explanation:
In the eight years since Chief Justice Roberts joined the court, it has allowed corporations to spend freely in elections in the Citizens United case, has shielded them from class actions and human rights suits, and has made arbitration the favored way to resolve many disputes.