As discussed in the AV presentation, persons telling high-stakes lies will probably show facial signs of _____ and ______.

Answer:

Housing

Explanation:

On average, Housing takes up around 22% of the people's income in United States.  Followed by Household needs and insurance with  9% and 8% of the income fraction.

This data only  applicable to average Americans. Those who have high income bracket usually only spend very small portion of their income across the board and can put most of them into investments or saving.

Answer:

The Catattahoo chee River

Explanation:

This river forms the southern half of the Alabama and Georgia border, and Florida

Answer: The most obvious motives advanced for the socio-economic causes of Xenophobia are unemployment, poverty and inadequate or lack of service delivery which are mostly politically attributed. Unemployment constitutes a social problem pertaining to a situation of not having a job.

Explanation:

Lexical semantics is mostly concerned with the meanings of individual words, while compositional semantics deals with the meaning of phrases and sentences formed by combining those words.

Lexical semantics is the study of the meaning of individual words and their relationships to other words in a language. It focuses on the meaning of words and how they are used in different contexts. Compositional semantics is the study of how the meanings of words combine to form the meanings of larger phrases and sentences. It is concerned with the meaning of larger structures and how they are composed of smaller parts.

Using these definitions, we can identify which statements are mostly about lexical semantics and which are mostly about compositional semantics.

a. This statement is mostly about lexical semantics because it is discussing the meaning of the words "purple" and "books" and how they are related to each other.

b. This statement is mostly about lexical semantics because it is discussing the meanings of two individual words, "couch" and "sofa," and how they are similar in meaning.

c. This statement is mostly about compositional semantics because it is discussing the meaning of a larger phrase, "water under the bridge," and how it differs from the meaning of a similar phrase, "bridge under the water."

d. This statement is mostly about compositional semantics because it is discussing the meaning of a larger sentence, "John ate a bagel for breakfast," and how it is composed of smaller parts (the names "John" and "bagel," the verb "ate," and the prepositional phrase "for breakfast").

e. This statement is mostly about lexical semantics because it is discussing the meanings of two individual words, "open" and "shut," and how they are opposite in meaning.

Learn more about Lexical semantics: https://brainly.com/question/28259292

#SPJ11

Answer:

Sep 8, 2017 — The city of Babylon was the center of an empire for two millennia, ruled ... One of its early rulers, Hammurabi, created a harsh system of laws, ... across the Middle East as a way of communicating across borders. ... "At home he concentrated on improving the economic basis of his kingdom by building canals.

Explanation:

Answer: It's C Boston.

Explanation:

On April 23, 1635, the first public school in what would become the United States was established in Boston, Massachusetts. Known as the Boston Latin School, this boys-only public secondary school was led by schoolmaster Philemon Pormont, a Puritan settler.

Answer:

A. Manufacturers employed only workers born on U.S. soil.

Explanation:

The initial rules included the employment of people born is U.S only. Later on it was allowed for other countries to come and seek job U.S. The chart determines that actions are taken for the reduction of unemployment of U.S. nationals.

According to the chapter discussion of the Patty Hearst case, she was kidnapped due to her family's wealth and social status. The kidnappers, a left-wing extremist group called the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA), demanded a $70 million ransom from her wealthy family.

The Patty Hearst case is a high-profile case in which Patty Hearst, an American newspaper heiress, was kidnapped by a left-wing extremist group called the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) in 1974. The group demanded a $70 million ransom from Hearst's wealthy family. Patty Hearst was kidnapped due to her family's wealth and social status.

As previously stated, Patty Hearst was kidnapped due to her family's wealth and social status. The kidnappers, the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA), were a left-wing extremist group who saw the Hearst family as a symbol of everything that was wrong with American society. The SLA demanded that the Hearst family donate $70 million worth of food to the poor in exchange for Patty's release, but the Hearst family refused.

After Patty Hearst was kidnapped, she was held captive by the SLA for several months. During this time, the SLA brainwashed her and convinced her to join their cause. Patty Hearst became a member of the SLA and participated in several of their illegal activities, including a bank robbery. She was eventually arrested and charged with her crimes, but her sentence was commuted by President Jimmy Carter. Patty Hearst was later pardoned by President Bill Clinton.

To know more about kidnapping refer: https://brainly.com/question/8264226

#SPJ11

Answer:

a volunteer firefighter

Answer:

a member of city council

Explanation:

Answer:

beliefs

religion

Explanation:

the partners beliefs may be different

partners might clash because of religion

One of the interesting discoveries while working on a project is that you may experience unforeseen challenges and obstacles that you did not anticipate. Finding solutions to these problems is a great way to learn and grow as an individual.

About oneself: While working on a course or project, you may discover your strengths and weaknesses, skills, interests, and preferences. Discovering your strengths can help you better understand yourself, your abilities, and how to maximize your potential. While discovering your weaknesses can help you focus on areas where you need to improve.

About others: Working with others is another interesting discovery one can make while working on a course or project. It provides a platform for you to learn about others' experiences, perspectives, and skills. It is an excellent opportunity to learn how to collaborate and work as a team to accomplish a shared goal.

About culture: While working on a course or project, you can learn about different cultures, traditions, and perspectives. It can help you understand and appreciate the diversity of people around you. You can learn how to engage respectfully with people from diverse backgrounds, build relationships, and work effectively in multicultural environments.

To know more about  culture here

https://brainly.com/question/25010777

#SPJ4

Chieftaincy is not considered a social institution in Ghana. The correct answer is option D.

In conclusion, the chief's place, marriage, and naming ceremony are key social institutions in Ghana, reflecting the cultural values and practices of the society.

For more questions on Chieftaincy :

https://brainly.com/question/17057370

#SPJ8

The type of mens rea demonstrated  when an individual lends a vehicle to another person knowing that person plans to use the vehicle to commit a crime is known as "knowledge."

This means that the individual lending the vehicle has knowledge that the person they are lending it to plans to use it to commit a crime. They may not have intended for the crime to happen, but they are aware of the potential consequences and willingly facilitate the crime by allowing the person to use the vehicle.

This level of mens rea is important in criminal law because it shows that the individual understood the potential consequences of their actions and knowingly participated in the crime. In some cases, this can result in charges of aiding and abetting or accessory to the crime.

It is important for individuals to consider the potential consequences of their actions and to refrain from lending their property to someone if they have knowledge that it will be used for criminal purposes.

To know more about crime refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31365862#

#SPJ11

Settling out of court is replacing going to court for several reasons. Firstly, it offers parties involved in a dispute the opportunity to have more control over the outcome.

In court, the decision is ultimately left to a judge or jury, whereas in a settlement, parties can negotiate and reach an agreement that meets their specific needs and interests. Settling out of court also tends to be faster and less costly than going through a lengthy court process. It can help avoid the emotional stress, uncertainty, and adversarial nature often associated with litigation.

Additionally, settling out of court promotes a more collaborative and cooperative approach to dispute resolution. Parties have the chance to engage in dialogue, find common ground, and potentially preserve relationships rather than having a winner-takes-all outcome. It encourages compromise and can lead to creative solutions that may not be available through a court judgment.

Whether settling out of court is a good trend depends on the context and individual perspectives. While it offers numerous advantages, there are also potential downsides. For example, power imbalances between parties could affect the fairness of the settlement, and there may be situations where going to court is necessary to ensure justice and uphold legal rights. It's important to ensure that parties have access to legal advice and support to make informed decisions during the settlement process.

Overall, settling out of court is an increasingly popular trend due to its benefits in terms of control, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and potential for more collaborative resolutions. However, it's essential to continually evaluate and refine the system to ensure fairness, access to justice, and the protection of legal rights for all parties involved.

learn more about court here

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ11

Recent trends in marriages between people from different races or ethnic groups indicate a growing acceptance of exogamy.

Over the past few decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of marriages between individuals from different racial or ethnic backgrounds. According to the Pew Research Center, the rate of intermarriage has more than doubled since 1980, and today, approximately one in six marriages in the United States is between partners from different racial or ethnic groups. This trend indicates a growing acceptance of exogamy, or the practice of marrying outside one's own social or cultural group.
There are several factors that may be contributing to this trend. For one, as society becomes more diverse and multicultural, people are increasingly likely to encounter individuals from different racial or ethnic backgrounds in their daily lives. Additionally, the rise of online dating has made it easier for individuals to connect with potential partners from different backgrounds.
Despite this growing acceptance of exogamy, there are still some who believe in the importance of endogamy, or marrying within one's own group. However, the overall trend suggests that attitudes towards intermarriage are becoming more accepting and inclusive.

To know more about ethnic visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30520823

#SPJ11

Answer:

A.

Hope that helps! We are learning this unit in history!

Explanation:

The religious movement in Great Britain that desired to return to a more "godly" worship was known as the Puritan movement.

Puritans believed in the importance of a personal relationship with God and a strict adherence to biblical teachings. They sought to purify the Church of England from what they saw as the corruption of Catholicism and the excesses of the Anglican Church. Puritans emphasized the importance of prayer, reading scripture, and living a virtuous life. They also advocated for simpler forms of worship that focused on preaching and singing hymns rather than elaborate rituals and ceremonies. The Puritan movement had a significant impact on British society and culture, and their influence can still be seen today in the emphasis on personal piety and morality in many Christian denominations.

To know more about Puritan visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29773668

#SPJ11

Professor Jones' desire to challenge his students is admirable. When it comes to Bloom's Taxonomy, the most challenging level is the highest one, which is evaluation. This level requires students to assess, judge, and analyze information to form an opinion or make a decision. At this level, students are expected to think critically and creatively, using their knowledge to evaluate and make informed judgments. Evaluation often involves multiple perspectives and requires the application of various criteria to reach a well-supported conclusion.

In this level, students are expected to go beyond simply understanding or remembering information. They must use higher-order thinking skills, including analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This level also demands that students can communicate their ideas effectively, both verbally and in writing. Professor Jones' focus on this level of Bloom's Taxonomy indicates that he is aiming to develop his students' critical thinking and decision-making skills, preparing them for real-world challenges.

However, it is essential to note that each level of Bloom's Taxonomy builds on the previous one. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that students have a strong foundation in the lower levels before tackling the most challenging one. Professor Jones' efforts to challenge his students should, therefore, involve gradually introducing them to increasingly complex concepts and skills while still ensuring they master the foundational skills.

Learn more about Bloom here:

https://brainly.com/question/31089114

#SPJ11

Answer:

thats all I can't do more

Explanation:

-tourism makes the country more famous -increases the economy of a country -helps in the recognition of cultures -helps to spend a beautiful time in another country, ie tourists have the opportunity to spend their holidays in another country -increases the population of a country

Answer:

Option C (expectations, obligations, and rights) would be the appropriate choice.

Explanation:

Any other solutions offered aren't relevant to the situation presented. So, the solution here is just the right one.

Answer:

C.) expectations, obligations, and rights

Explanation:

After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 and collapse of Soviet Russia's controlled economy a new Russian Federation was created under Boris Yeltsin in 1991. The Russian Federation had multiple economic reforms including privatization and market and trade liberalization due to the collapse of communism.

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) is a powerful group of Communist republics countries without a king or queen including Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, and 11 others that existed in Europe and Asia from 1922 to 1991.

What happened to Russia after the USSR fell is the modern history of Russia began with the Russian Republic of the Soviet Union gaining more political and economical autonomy amidst the imminent dissolution of the USSR during 1990–1991. proclaiming its sovereignty inside the Union in June 1990 and electing its first President Boris Yeltsin a year later.

Learn more about USSR here : brainly.com/question/25774915

#SPJ1

People with schizophrenia who reside in developed nations have a lower chance of making a full recovery and are more likely to require hospitalization.

Delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (observing or hearing things that are not there), strange bodily behavior, and disorganized thinking and speech are typical symptoms of schizophrenia. People with schizophrenia frequently experience paranoid ideas or hear voices.

Unknown factors are thought to be the root of schizophrenia. According to research, a person's propensity to develop the disorder may depend on a person's physical, genetic, psychological, and environmental factors. Because certain people are predisposed to schizophrenia, a difficult or upsetting life event could set off a psychotic break.

To know more about schizophrenia visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15776258

#SPJ4

According to Piaget's theory of cognitive development, school-age children (ages 6 to 12) are in the concrete operational stage. This stage is characterized by the development of logical thinking, conservation of quantity, and the ability to understand the perspectives of others. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is d. logical.

During this stage, children become more systematic and organized in their thinking, which allows them to solve problems in a more logical and efficient manner. They are able to understand cause-and-effect relationships, and they are able to classify objects based on their characteristics. They are also able to understand the concept of time and can perform basic arithmetic operations. While children in the concrete operational stage can be imaginative, they are not characterized by their imagination. Imaginative play is more common in younger children who are in the preoperational stage. Similarly, while school-age children can be friendly and fearless, these traits are not unique to this age group and can be observed in children of all ages.

In conclusion, according to Piaget, the distinguishing characteristic of school-age children is their ability to think logically and systematically. They are able to understand cause-and-effect relationships, classify objects based on their characteristics, and solve problems in a more efficient manner.

To know more about Piaget's theory visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/26257988

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Republican Party

Explanation:

The war pitted the Central Powers (mainly Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey) against the Allies (mainly France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and, from 1917, the United States). Read more about the Allied powers.

Answer:

I know the U.S and Britain was in WWI

Explanation:

Answer:

Judicial oversight of public school finance in Texas.

Explanation:

The state of Texas has one of the United States 'widest, and most diversified public education systems. Manage and finance such a broad and diverse school system proved a significant challenge for the state legislature.  As per the recent school financing lawsuit against the state bringing into question the constitutionality of the school financing program, the Texas supreme court ensures that the public education funding system ensures the minimum constitutional standards. However,  the existing funding framework does not provide sufficient or efficient support for high-quality programs aimed at enhancing education outcomes.

There are several reasons why some Americans have been opposed to immigration throughout history. The following options apply: Concerns about undocumented immigration, Fear of immigrants taking jobs from Americans and Desire to keep traditional US culture.

The following alternatives are available:

For such more question on immigration:

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

#SPJ11

Answer:

Option A, B, C and E is correct

Explanation:

Edge 2023

Answer:

I think the answer is tanner

Answer:

The people on the branches are mainly in charge of every thing

Explanation:

Answer:

Americans believe they have a right to vote for all elected officials who represent them, including the president. But nowhere does the Constitution guarantee that as an absolute right. Throughout our history, that ambiguity has made it easy for politicians and parties to disenfranchise people they do not want to vote. The Constitution requires the states to have a republican form of government, but that clause has never been understood to mandate universal suffrage. The framers left voting and citizenship almost entirely up to the individual states, notably in Article One, Section Four, which specified that “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof” (although it stipulated that “the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations”). From 1789 to 2019, the legislative and judicial branches have been cautious about interfering in what is presumed to be the prerogative of the individual states.

Since the Civil War, a series of constitutional amendments, acts of Congress, and Supreme Court decisions have extended the right to vote, but always through negative prohibitions on what a state or locality may do. The lack of affirmative guarantees of the right to vote has repeatedly created space for legal disenfranchisement. The Fifteenth Amendment (1870) barred voter disenfranchisement on the basis of race or color, just as the Nineteenth banned the use of gender (1920), and the Twenty-Sixth (1972) age (for anyone eighteen or older). The Twenty-Fourth Amendment (1965) outlawed requiring payment of a tax as a prerequisite for voting in federal (but not state or local) elections. Beginning with the 1962 Baker v. Carr decision, the Supreme Court required “one person/one vote” proportionality in allocating congressional, state, and local legislative districts. Finally, the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 1965 gave the federal government the authority to intervene when state or municipal governments impeded voter registration or limited access to the polls.

It is the longer history that matters here. The VRA, the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, and related judicial decisions were extremely belated responses to sustained disenfranchisement. Between 1890 and 1908, nearly all of the southern states circumvented the Fifteenth Amendment through formally race-neutral legislation, including literacy tests, poll taxes, and the grandfather clause. All of these measures passed muster with the Supreme Court for many decades. Nor were such measures limited to the South. During the Progressive Era, numerous northern and western states mandated strict residency and registration regulations to limit voting by poor people, especially immigrants. Although most people assume the VRA covered only the South, its pre-clearance provisions (meaning the Department of Justice must approve changes in voting laws) have also applied to parts of New York City and some western states with large Native American populations because of prima facie evidence of racial disenfranchisement.

Most of the legal apparatus of disenfranchisement was dismantled in the 1950s and 1960s. But recent history demonstrates that none of the constitutional, judicial, and legislative precedents established then have prevented states from again disenfranchising large sections of their electorates. Since 2006, almost three dozen states have passed “voter identification” laws requiring documents that poor people, people of color, students, and older voters find expensive and difficult to procure. The result (and intent) is to disfranchise many thousands of otherwise-eligible voters, some of whom had voted for decades. In addition, unregulated purges of voting rolls based on arbitrary criteria have surged, also removing many from voter rolls. In all these instances, the Supreme Court has been wholly unwilling to intervene, and in 2013, its Shelby County v. Alabama decision gutted the Voting Rights Act’s provision requiring Department of Justice pre-clearance.

Explanation:

Lol sorry this isn't that simple of an answer, but I hope it helps!