Bookstore is having a sale. Every book is 25% off. How much would you pay for a book that cost $26?

Answer:

its 99

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The value of 7w - 8 is -22

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us solve the question

∵ -4w - 5 = 3

→ Move -5 from the left side to the right side by adding both sides by 5

∴ -4w - 5 + 5 = 3 + 5

∴ -4w = 8

→ Divide both sides by -4

∵ \(\frac{-4w}{-4}\) = \(\frac{8}{-4}\)

∴ w = -2

→ Now let us find the value of the given expression

∵ The given expression is 7w - 8

→ Substitute w by -2 to gets its value

∴ 7w - 8 = 7(-2) - 8

∴ 7w - 8 = -14 - 8

∴ 7w - 8 = -22

∴ The value of 7w - 8 is -22

The real number √21 is an example of an irrational number. (Correct choice: C)

According to number theory, real numbers are formed by the following sets:

Then, by direct inspection we get the following conclusions:

To learn more on irrational numbers: https://brainly.com/question/17450097

#SPJ1

To find the value of the effective spring constant (k), we are given the masses of oxygen (16.0 atomic mass units) and carbon (12.0 atomic mass units). We will use this information to determine the value of k.

The effective spring constant (k) is a measure of the stiffness of the spring and is usually given in units of force per unit length or mass per unit time squared. In this case, we need to determine k based on the masses of oxygen and carbon.

To find k, we can use the formula for the effective spring constant in a molecular vibration system, which is given by:

K = (ω^2)(μ)

Where ω is the angular frequency of the vibration and μ is the reduced mass of the system.

Since we are given the masses of oxygen and carbon, we can calculate the reduced mass (μ) as follows:

Μ = (m1 * m2) / (m1 + m2)

Where m1 and m2 are the masses of oxygen and carbon, respectively.

Using the given masses:
M1 = 16.0 atomic mass units (oxygen)
M2 = 12.0 atomic mass units (carbon)

We can substitute these values into the equation for μ:

Μ = (16.0 * 12.0) / (16.0 + 12.0)
= 192.0 / 28.0
≈ 6.857 atomic mass units

Now, to find the value of k, we need the angular frequency (ω) of the vibration. Unfortunately, the angular frequency is not provided in the given information. Without the angular frequency, we cannot determine the exact value of k.

Therefore, we can calculate the reduced mass (μ) using the given masses of oxygen and carbon, but we cannot find the value of k without the angular frequency.

Learn more about equation here : brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

Answer: Yea, Good job :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The bond yield is 6.80%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

You purchase a bond with a coupon rate of 8.5% and par value of $2,000. The value of the bond rose to $2,500. What is the bond yield?

The bond can now be calculated as follows:

Coupon payment = Coupon rate * Bond per value = 8.5% * $2,000 = $170

Bond yield = Coupon payment / Current value of the bond = $170 / $2,500 = 0.068, or 6.80%

Therefore, the bond yield is 6.80%.

Answer:

The Coombs test checks your blood for antibodies that attack red blood cells. It can help prevent and diagnose problems.

ummmm

also what cu.ms out of a co.ck

lm.ao

Answer:

y-4=3(x-5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the equation of a line so,

(y-y₁) = m(x-x₁)

m=3

x₁=5

y₁=4

plug into the equation to get...

y-4 = 3(x-5)

Answer:

\(\rightarrow \boxed{\sf{y-4=3(x-5)}}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

A point slope form should be used.

Point-slope form:

\(\rightarrow \sf{y-y_1=m(x-x_1)}\)

The m represents the slope.

Also, slope-intercept formula and slope formula can be used.

Slope formula:

\(\rightarrow \sf{\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}=\dfrac{RISE}{RUN} }\)

Slope-intercept formula:

\(\rightarrow \sf{y=mx+b}\)

The m represents the slope.

The b represents the y-intercept.

In other words, slope-intercept form is y=3x-11.

Therefore, the correct answer is y-4=3(x-5).

I hope this helps you! Let me know if my answer is wrong or not.

If the level of significance is decreased, the interval for the population proportion becomes narrower.

The level of significance, denoted by α, is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. When the level of significance is decreased, it means that we are requiring stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This leads to a narrower confidence interval.

In a confidence interval for a population proportion, the range between the lower and upper bounds represents the range of plausible values for the true population proportion. As the level of significance is decreased, the critical value associated with it becomes larger, resulting in a smaller margin of error and a narrower confidence interval.

Therefore, as the level of significance decreases, the interval for the population proportion becomes narrower, providing a more precise estimate of the true population proportion.

To learn more about proportion click here:

brainly.com/question/13851193

#SPJ11

Answer:

£10.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Highest exchange rate=1.3401

Lowest exchange rate=1.3199

The money Khan would have received more if he exchanged currencies at the highest rate compared to the lowest rate=500*(1.3401-1.3199)=£10.1

It is indeed possible for it to take more than k pivots to find a "real" BFS when using the Big M method, where k is the number of artificial variables introduced.

If the reduced cost of all non-basic variables is strictly ≥0, it does not necessarily mean that the current basic feasible solution (BFS) is optimal. The reduced cost of a variable represents the amount by which the objective function value would improve if that variable were included in the current BFS. When the reduced cost is ≥0 for all non-basic variables, it indicates that there is no incentive to include any of those variables in the current BFS as they would not contribute to improving the objective function.

However, it is still possible that the current BFS is not optimal. There could be other feasible solutions that have a lower objective function value, and these solutions might involve changing the current set of basic variables. To determine optimality, additional criteria need to be considered, such as the feasibility of the solution and the optimality conditions of the linear programming problem.

When using the Big M method to find an initial basic feasible solution (BFS), it is possible that it may take more than k pivots to find a "real" basic feasible solution that includes only the variables in the original problem.

The Big M method introduces artificial variables with a large coefficient (M) in the objective function to enforce constraints during the initial phase of solving a linear programming problem. These artificial variables ensure that all constraints are satisfied and provide a starting BFS. However, these artificial variables are not part of the original problem and need to be removed to obtain a "real" BFS.

The number of pivots required to find a "real" BFS depends on the particular problem and the choice of artificial variables. It is possible that additional pivots are needed to eliminate the artificial variables and identify a feasible solution that includes only the original variables.

Therefore, it is indeed possible for it to take more than k pivots to find a "real" BFS when using the Big M method, where k is the number of artificial variables introduced.

Learn more about  Big M method  from

https://brainly.com/question/33248464

#SPJ11

Learn more about Experiment link in below

brainly.com/question/11256472

#SPJ11

Answer:

A) 3.996 inches

B) 0.01

C) option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Note: The diameter of the lid is between : 3.95 and  4.05

A) calculate the supplier set mean diameter

std = 0.02 inch

P( x < 3.95 ) = 1% = 0.01

= P ( Z < \((\frac{3.95 - u }{0.02})\) ) = P ( Z < -2.3263 ) = 0.01

therefore :

\((\frac{3.95 - u }{0.02})\)  = -2.3263

hence : u = 3.996 inches ( mean diameter )

B) At mean diameter = 3.98 calculate the value of std

P ( X < 3.95 ) = 0.01

= P ( Z < \(( \frac{3.95-3.98 }{std } )\) )  = P ( Z < -2.3263 ) = 0.01

therefore

\(( \frac{3.95-3.98 }{std } )\) = -2.3263

hence std = 0.01 inch

C) option B is preferable because its mean diameter is smaller and  the percent of lids too large to fit is considered more carefully using option B

Answer:

m<w= 36°

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1) Applying geometric and algebraic knowledge, the two angles to the left are both 90, and equal to 180. If you add those two angles and the 146°, you will be given 326 in total.

90+90= 180 +146 = 326

Step 2) With knowledge that the sum of all interior angles inside of a quadrilateral add up to 360, subtract 326 from this.

360-326=36

Final product: m<w=36°

The confidence interval with the smaller margin of error will be the one with the smaller sample proportion difference.

(a) To calculate the point estimate of the proportion of respondents who think the country is headed in the right direction, divide the number of "yes" responses by the total number of respondents (2,500).
Point estimate = (number of "yes" responses) / 2,500
(b) To find the margin of error at 95% confidence, use the formula:
Margin of error = Z * √(p(1-p) / n)
Here, Z = 1.96 (from the standard normal distribution for 95% confidence), p is the point estimate calculated in part (a), and n = 2,500.
(c) To find the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of respondents who think the country is headed in the right direction, use the formula:
Confidence interval = point estimate ± margin of error
(d) To find the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of respondents who do not think the country is headed in the right direction, first calculate the point estimate for "no" responses:
Point estimate (no) = (number of "no" responses) / 2,500
Then calculate the margin of error and confidence interval as in parts (b) and (c).
(e) To determine which confidence interval has a smaller margin of error, compare the margin of error calculated in parts (b) and (d).

For similar question on proportion.

https://brainly.com/question/29864115

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes you are, good job !

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-2 and -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer in picture

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

F type connector

Step-by-step explanation:

Use an F-type connector for broadband cable connections that use coaxial cable.

The F connector is a coaxial RF connector commonly used for "over the air" terrestrial television, cable television and universally for satellite television and cable modems,

#SPJ4

Learn more on

https://brainly.com/question/14391417

F type connector

Learn more about wire here

https://brainly.com/question/15246898

#SPJ4

Answer:

\(5\)

....,,,✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

Answer:

the answer is 180cm for the rectangle

the answer is 126cm for the triangle.

the answer is 880ml for the rectangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

first diagram (rectangle)

area=l×b

15×12

180cm

second diagram(triangle)

area =

\( \frac{1}{2} \times l \times b \\ \frac{1}{2} \times 14 \times 18 \\ = 7 \times 18 \\ 126cm\)

third diagram( rectangle)

area=

\(l \times b \\ \\ 44 \times 20 \\ 880ml\)

a) The probability of a randomly selected diner waits less than 8 minutes for a table is 0.4

b) The probability of a randomly selected diner waits more than 1.5 minutes is 0.925

Given, wait times of between 0 and 20 minutes at a local restaurant follow a uniform distribution.

The probability density function of a uniform distribution is given by

f(x) = {1/(b-a)} where a ≤ x ≤ b

where a = 0 and b = 20

Therefore, the probability density function of f(x) = 1/20 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 20

For the  probability that a randomly selected diner waits between 2 and 7.5 minutes for a table, we need to find the area under the curve from x = 2 to x = 7.5

∴ P(2 ≤ x ≤ 7.5) = ∫₂⁷.⁵(1/20) dx

= 5.5/20 ⇒ 0.275

a) We need to find the area under the curve from x = 0 to x = 8

∴ P(x < 8) = ∫₀⁸(1/20) dx

= 8/20 ⇒ 0.4

b) We need to find the area under the curve from x = 1.5 to x = 20

∴ P(x > 1.5) = ∫₁.₅²⁰(1/20) dx

= 18.5/20 ⇒ 0.925

To know more about the "probability" of a randomly selected: https://brainly.com/question/30044489

#SPJ11

To calculate the Y* coordinate of the weighted center of gravity for the new fire station, we need additional information regarding the locations and population sizes of the four neighborhoods in Green Valley, Arizona. Once we have this information, we can calculate the weighted center of gravity by considering the population of each neighborhood as the weight and using the formula Σ(xi * wi) / Σwi, where xi represents the Y-coordinate of each neighborhood and wi represents the population weight.

In order to calculate the Y* coordinate of the weighted center of gravity for the new fire station, we require the Y-coordinates and population sizes of the four neighborhoods in Green Valley, Arizona. With this information, we can proceed to calculate the weighted center of gravity using the following formula:
Y* = Σ(xi * wi) /   Σwi
where xi represents the Y-coordinate of each neighborhood and wi represents the population weight of each neighborhood.
The Y* coordinate obtained will represent the vertical position of the weighted center of gravity. It indicates the optimal location for the new fire station, taking into account the population distribution in the area.
However, since the exact locations and population sizes of the neighborhoods have not been provided, it is not possible to calculate the Y* coordinate of the weighted center of gravity in this scenario. To determine the optimal location for the fire station, the city of Green Valley, Arizona, would need to gather the necessary data on neighborhood locations and population sizes, and then apply the formula mentioned above.

Learn more about y-coordinate here
https://brainly.com/question/23392068

 #SPJ11

Answer:

we should solve it or what should we do...

The Quadratic Equation is x² + 3x +2.

Equations are mathematical statements with two algebraic expressions flanking the equals (=) sign on either side.

It demonstrates the equality of the relationship between the expressions printed on the left and right sides. LHS = RHS is a common mathematical formula.

Coefficients, variables, operators, constants, terms, expressions, and the equal to sign are some of the components of an equation. The "=" sign and terms on both sides must always be present when writing an equation.

Given:

x= -1 and x= -2

So, the writing the roots in form of Factor as (x+ 1) and (x+ 2).

Then, (x+ 1)(x+ 2)

= x² + x + 2x + 2

= x² + 3x +2

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

Answer:

 17.14

Step-by-step explanation:

You have the data values {3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15}

To find the mean, \(\frac{3+4+5+7+10+12+15}{7} =8\), yay a whole number, my favorite.

Then, \((3-8)^2+(4-8)^2+(5-8)^2+(7-8)^2+(10-8)^2+(12-8)^2+(15-8)^2=120\).

Since n=7, σ^2≈\(17.14\)

The correct answer is approximately 0.459.To calculate the probability that at least 2 boys choose the same type of watch, we can use the concept of complementary probability.

First, let's consider the total number of possible outcomes. Each boy has 11 different watch styles to choose from, so the total number of possible outcomes is 11^4 (since there are 4 boys).

Next, let's calculate the number of favorable outcomes, which is the number of ways in which at least 2 boys choose the same type of watch. We can calculate this by considering the cases where exactly 2 boys choose the same type of watch, exactly 3 boys choose the same type of watch, and exactly 4 boys choose the same type of watch.

For exactly 2 boys choosing the same type of watch, we have 4C2 ways to choose the two boys and 11 choices for the common watch type. This gives us 4C2 * 11.

For exactly 3 boys choosing the same type of watch, we have 4C3 ways to choose the three boys and 11 choices for the common watch type. This gives us 4C3 * 11.

For exactly 4 boys choosing the same type of watch, we have 11 choices for the common watch type.

So, the number of favorable outcomes is 4C2 * 11 + 4C3 * 11 + 11.

Now, we can calculate the probability of at least 2 boys choosing the same type of watch by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes:

Probability = (4C2 * 11 + 4C3 * 11 + 11) / (11^4)

Calculating this expression, we get a result of approximately 0.459.

For such more questions on Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

Answer:

At 6% interest rate, amount invested = $7000

At 8% interest rate, amount invested = $21000

Step-by-step explanation:

Let amount invested in one account be x and amount invested in the other be y.

Thus;

x + y = 28000 - - - - (eq1)

Interest rate for them are 6% and 8% annually.

We are told that total interest earned for the year was $2100

Thus;

0.06x + 0.08y = 2100 - - - - (eq 2)

Make x the subject in equation 1.

x = 28000 - y - - - - (eq 3)

Put 28000 - y for x in eq 2

0.06(28000 - y) + 0.08y = 2100

1680 - 0.06y + 0.08y = 2100

0.02y = 2100 - 1680

0.02y = 420

y = 420/0.02

y = 21000

Put 21000 for y in eq 3 to get;

x = 28000 - 21000

x = 7000

Thus amount invested in each account is;

At 6% interest rate, amount invested = $7000

At 8% interest rate, amount invested = $21000

The answer as an exact decimal = -0.84 and simplified fraction = −21/25.

Simplifying a fraction is the process of reducing a fraction to its most basic form. If the numerator and denominator of a fraction have no common factors other than one, the fraction is in its simplest form.

When solving fraction problems, we must first simplify them. Even if we simplify them, the fraction's value will remain unchanged. This means that the simplified and actual fractions are equivalent fractions.

Given that

-67/50 + 1.5 − 100% = ?

Lets solve

= -67/50 + 1.5 − 100%

= -67/50 + 1.5 − (100 × 0.01)

= -67/50 + 3/2 - 1

= -67/50 + 75/50 - 50/50

= (-67 + 75- 50)/50

= −42/50

= −21/25

= -0.84

Learn more about simplified fraction

https://brainly.com/question/28242672

#SPJ4