In paragraph 8, how does the power of the old oak tree support a theme of the story? Use two
details from the story to support your response.

Answer:

62°

Step-by-step explanation:

A right angle is 90 degrees, so we'd do 90 - 28 = 62

hope this helps!

Answer:

A. 13.

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 9 = 2(3x - 38)

X + 9 = 6X - 76

85 = 5x

x = 85/5

x =  17

So RS = 3(17) - 38

= 51 - 38

= 13

The base salary per year is $66,200, and she only gets the target for medication A, the 70% of the annual bonus of $22,500

(22,500 * 70)/ 100 = 15,750

So the total of her compensation (salary plus bonus) is:

$66,200 + $15,750 = $81950

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: Square feet

The maximum profit is 6 and it is obtained when we mix 0.6 kg of type A, 0 kg of type B, and 0.4 kg of type C.

The optimal mix for the maximum profit can be found as follows:

The company mixes three types of toffees, A, B, and C. Let the weights of type A, B, and C be a, b, and c kg, respectively. Let us assume that we are making 1kg of toffee pack. Therefore, the weight of type C should be 1 - (a + b) kg. Also, the mixture must contain at least 300 gms of type A i.e a >= 0.3 kg

Also, the weight of the first two types (A and B) must be at least equal to the weight of type C, i.e a + b >= c. This condition can also be written as a + b - c >= 0

Let us now calculate the total cost of making 1kg of toffee pack.

Cost = 20a + 10b + 5c

If the pack is sold at Rs. 17, then the profit per 1kg of toffee pack is by

Profit = Selling Price - Cost = 17 - (20a + 10b + 5c)

Now we have the following linear programming problem:

Maximize P = 17 - (20a + 10b + 5c)

Subject to constraints: a + b + c = 1 (since we are making 1kg of toffee pack)

a >= 0.3a + b - c >= 0a, b, c >= 0

We can use the simplex method to solve this linear programming problem. However, to save time, we can solve it graphically. The feasible region is as follows:

We can see that the corner points of the feasible region are: (0.3, 0, 0.7), (0.6, 0, 0.4), (0, 0.5, 0.5), and (0, 1, 0).

Let us calculate the profit at each of these corner points. For example, at the point (0.3, 0, 0.7), we have a = 0.3, b = 0, and c = 0.7. Therefore, the profit is

P = 17 - (20(0.3) + 10(0) + 5(0.7)) = 3.5

Similarly, we can calculate the profit at the other corner points as well. The corner point (0.3, 0, 0.7) gives a profit of 3.5

Corner point (0.6, 0, 0.4) result in a profit of 6

Corner point (0, 0.5, 0.5) results in a profit of 5

Corner point (0, 1, 0) gives a profit of 3

You can learn more about optimal mix at: brainly.com/question/30629565

#SPJ11

\(g(x) = 4x^2 + 3x\)

So, \(g(x+a) = 4(x+a)^2 + 3(x+a)\), since we're just substituting (x+a) for x.

If we clean that up a bit,

    \(\begin{aligned}g(x+a) &= 4(x+a)^2 + 3(x+a)\\[0.5em] &= 4(x^2+2xa+a^2) + 3x+3a\\[0.5em] &= 4x^2+8xa+4a^2 + 3x+3a\end{aligned}\)

Now putting this all together:

    \(\begin{aligned}g(x+a)-g(x) &= ( 4x^2+8xa+4a^2 + 3x+3a) - (4x^2+3x)\\[0.5em] &= 4x^2+8xa+4a^2 + 3x+3a - 4x^2-3x\\[0.5em]&= 8xa+4a^2 +3a\end{aligned}\)

Remember that \((x+a)^2 = (x+a)(x+a) = x^2+2xa+a^2\)

The original equation and the orthogonal equation are the same, we can conclude that the family of conics with the same focus x^2/a^2+C + y^2/b^2+C = 1 is its own orthogonal family of curves.

To show that the family of conics with the same focus x^2/a^2+C + y^2/b^2+C = 1 is its own orthogonal family of curves, we need to take the derivative of the equation and set it equal to -1/b^2, the slope of the orthogonal line.

First, we take the derivative of the equation with respect to x:

2x/a^2 = -2y/b^2 * dy/dx

Simplifying, we get:

dy/dx = -b^2*x/a^2*y

Now, we set this equal to -1/b^2:

-b^2*x/a^2*y = -1/b^2

Cross-multiplying and simplifying, we get:

x/a^2*y = 1/b^2

Finally, we can rearrange this equation to get:

y = b^2*x/a^2

This equation represents the orthogonal family of curves to the original family of conics. Since the original equation and the orthogonal equation are the same, we can conclude that the family of conics with the same focus x^2/a^2+C + y^2/b^2+C = 1 is its own orthogonal family of curves.

Learn about Conics

brainly.com/question/29767685

#SPJ11

Answer:

(-4, -6)

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

FYT and UYF are supplementary angles (together they cover all angles around Y on one side of the line TU, and that's is in total 180°).

so,

FYT = 180 - 42 1/8 = 137 7/8°

as 180 - 42 = 138, and then we subtract another 1/8. that gives 137 7/8.

Answer:

#1 is 18

#2 is 12

and #3 is 57

Answer:

A. 18

B. 3

C. 0.7

Step-by-step explanation:

The advantages of the superposition theorem compared to other circuit theorems are its simplicity and modularity in circuit analysis, as well as its applicability to linear circuits.

Superposition theorem is a powerful tool in circuit analysis that allows us to simplify complex circuits and analyze them in a more systematic manner. When compared to other circuit theorems, such as Ohm's Law or Kirchhoff's laws, the superposition theorem offers several advantages. Here are two key advantages of the superposition theorem:

Simplicity and Modularity: One major advantage of the superposition theorem is its simplicity and modular approach to circuit analysis. The theorem states that in a linear circuit with multiple independent sources, the response (current or voltage) across any component can be determined by considering each source individually while the other sources are turned off. This approach allows us to break down complex circuits into simpler sub-circuits and analyze them independently. By solving these individual sub-circuits and then superposing the results, we can determine the overall response of the circuit. This modular nature of the superposition theorem simplifies the analysis process, making it easier to understand and apply.

Applicability to Linear Circuits: Another advantage of the superposition theorem is its applicability to linear circuits. The theorem holds true for circuits that follow the principles of linearity, which means that the circuit components (resistors, capacitors, inductors, etc.) behave proportionally to the applied voltage or current. Linearity is a fundamental characteristic of many practical circuits, making the superposition theorem widely applicable in real-world scenarios. This advantage distinguishes the superposition theorem from other circuit theorems that may have limitations or restrictions on their application, depending on the circuit's characteristics.

It's important to note that the superposition theorem has its limitations as well. It assumes linearity and works only with independent sources, neglecting any nonlinear or dependent sources present in the circuit. Additionally, the superposition theorem can become time-consuming when dealing with a large number of sources. Despite these limitations, the advantages of simplicity and applicability to linear circuits make the superposition theorem a valuable tool in circuit analysis.

To learn more about superposition theorem visit : https://brainly.com/question/25329462

#SPJ11

Answer:

(x+5)²(x²+5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given two functions x²+5 and x²+10x+25, to get their Lowest common factor, we need to to first factorize x²+10x+25

On factorising we have:

x²+5x+5x+25

= x(x+5) +5(x+5

= (x+5)(x+5)

= (x+5)²

The LCM can be calculated as thus

| x²+5, (x+5)²

x+5| x²+5, (x+5)

x+5| x²+5, 1

x²+5| 1, 1

The factors of both equation are x+5 × x+5 × x²+5

The LCM will be the product of the three functions i.e

(x+5)²(x²+5)

This hives the required expression.

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

so you do it and you get 13

The  ratio of the volume of the cone to the volume of the cylinder is approximately 0.33 : 1 (rounded to the nearest hundredth).

The volume of the cone can be calculated using the formula:

V = (1/3)πr^2h

where r is the radius of the cone and h is the height of the cone. Substituting the given values, we get:

V = (1/3)π(3)^2(11) = 103.67 cubic feet

Therefore, the volume of the cone is 103.67 cubic feet (rounded to the nearest hundredth).

To find the radius of the cylinder, we can use the formula for the volume of a cylinder:

V = πr^2h

where r is the radius of the cylinder and h is the height of the cylinder. We are given that the volume of the cylinder is 310.86 cubic feet and that the height is 11 feet, so we can solve for r:

310.86 = πr^2(11)
r^2 = 310.86 / (11π)
r ≈ 2.3 feet

Therefore, the radius of the cylinder is approximately 2.3 feet (rounded to the nearest hundredth).

The ratio of the volume of the cone to the volume of the cylinder is the volume of the cone divided by the volume of the cylinder. Using the values we calculated, we get:

V(cone) / V(cylinder) = 103.67 / 310.86 ≈ 0.33 : 1

Therefore, the ratio of the volume of the cone to the volume of the cylinder is approximately 0.33 : 1 (rounded to the nearest hundredth).

Visit to know more about Ratio:-

brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(2\sqrt{5}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\sqrt{20}\)

20 can be written as a product of 4 and 5.

\(\sqrt{4 \times 5}\)

4 is a perfect square.

\(\sqrt{4} \times \sqrt{5}\)

Square root of 4 is 2.

\(2 \times \sqrt{5}\)

Based on the information given, the computation shows that the distance between them is 2.47 miles.

Since one has bearing 41°45', this will be: = 41° + (45/60) = 41° + 0.75 = 41.75°.

The other has bearing 59°13'. This will be:

= 59° + (13/60) = 59° + 0.22 = 59.22°.

The difference of the angles will be:

= 59.22° - 41.75°

= 17.47°

Let the distance between them be represented by c. Therefore, we'll use cosine law to solve the question. This will be:

c² = a² + b² - 2ab cos 17.47°

c² = 20² + 20² - (2 × 20 × 20 × 0.19)

c² = 6.07459

c = 2.47

Learn more about distance on:

https://brainly.com/question/2854969

The average electric dipole moment for all given charge distributions is zero (p = 0).

6. The average electric dipole moment of a charge distribution is given by:

p = ∫ V rρ(r) d^3r

where V is the volume of integration, r is the position vector, and ρ(r) is the charge density.

For each charge distribution, we need to calculate the corresponding average dipole moment.

a) For the charge distribution ρ1(r) = qδ(r - ℓ) - qδ(r + ℓ):

Since the charge distribution consists of two point charges with opposite signs, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

b) For the charge distribution ρ2(r) = ρ0sinθ:

Since the charge distribution is symmetric about the origin and the charge density depends only on the polar angle θ, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

c) For the charge distribution ρ3(r) = ρ0cosθ:

Similarly, since the charge distribution is symmetric about the origin and the charge density depends only on the polar angle θ, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

d) For the charge distribution ρ4(r) = ρ0sinϕ:

Considering a spherical symmetry, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

e) For the charge distribution ρ5(r) = ρ0cosϕ:

Considering a spherical symmetry, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

f) For the charge distribution ρ6(r) = ρ0sinθsinϕ:

Since the charge distribution is symmetric under inversion through the origin, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

g) For the charge distribution ρ7(r) = ρ0cosθcosϕ:

Since the charge distribution is symmetric under inversion through the origin, the average dipole moment is zero.

p = 0

Therefore, for all the given charge distributions, the average electric dipole moment is zero (p = 0).

learn more about "integration":- https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

Answer:

Y=COS X+1

Step-by-step explanation:

The function whose graph is given by is y = cos x + 1.

Option C is the correct answer.

A function has an input and an output.

A function can be one-to-one or onto one.

It simply indicated the relationships between the input and the output.

Example:

f(x) = 2x + 1

f(1) = 2 + 1 = 3

f(2) = 2 x 2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5

The outputs of the functions are 3 and 5

The inputs of the function are 1 and 2.

We have,

The graph of the function y = cos(x) + 1 can be understood by analyzing its two component functions:

cos(x) and 1.

The function cos(x) is a periodic function that oscillates between -1 and 1, with a period of 2π.

The graph of cos(x) is a smooth curve that has its maximum value at x = 0 and its minimum value at x = π (or x = -π).

The function 1 is a constant function that takes on the value of 1 for all values of x.

The graph of 1 is a horizontal line that extends infinitely in both directions along the x-axis.

When we add the two functions together, we get the function:

y = cos(x) + 1.

This function shifts the graph of cos(x) upward by 1 unit, so that it oscillates between 0 and 2, with a maximum value of 2 when cos(x) = 1 and a minimum value of 0 when cos(x) = -1.

The resulting graph of y = cos(x) + 1 is a periodic curve that oscillates above and below the horizontal line y = 1, with a period of 2π.

It has its maximum value of 2 when x = 2nπ (where n is an integer), and its minimum value of 0 when x = (2n + 1)π (where n is an integer). The graph is symmetric about the line y = 1, which is the horizontal asymptote of the function.

Thus,

The function whose graph is given by is y = cos x + 1.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ7

Answer:

y = 1.4m + 7.4

Step-by-step explanation:

We assume that G is a connected planar graph with no vertex of degree <= 5. We will use e <= 3v - 6 to prove that G is not a planar graph. By handshaking lemma, we know that 2e = sum of degrees of all vertices. Let d be the maximum degree of G.

Qa. Contrapositive of an implication is a new implication formed by negating both the hypothesis and the conclusion.

The contrapositive of the implication "If G is a connected planar graph, then G has at least one vertex of degree <= 5" is "If G has no vertex of degree <= 5, then G is not a connected planar graph."

Qb. Proof: We assume that G is a connected planar graph with no vertex of degree <= 5.

We will use e <= 3v - 6 to prove that G is not a planar graph. By handshaking lemma, we know that 2e = sum of degrees of all vertices.

Let d be the maximum degree of G. Since G has no vertex of degree <= 5, then d >= 6.

Thus, the sum of degrees of all vertices in G is greater than or equal to 6v/2, which is equal to 3v.

Hence, 2e >= 3v.

Substituting this inequality in e <= 3v - 6, we get 2e >= 3e - 6, which implies that e >= 6.

Since e >= 6, it follows that G is not planar.

Qc. Proof: We use proof by induction on the number of vertices of G. For a graph with one vertex, the statement is trivially true.

For a graph with n > 1 vertices, assume that every planar graph with at most n - 1 vertices can be colored with 6 (or less) colors.

Let G be a planar graph with n vertices.

By part (a), there exists a vertex v of G with degree <= 5.

We remove v and all its edges from G to get a new graph G' with n - 1 vertices.

By the induction hypothesis, we can color G' with 6 (or less) colors.

We add back v and its edges to G.

Since v has degree <= 5, at most 5 colors are used on its adjacent vertices.

We use a new color for v.

Thus, G can be colored with 6 (or less) colors.

Therefore, by induction, the statement is true for all planar graphs.

To know more about planar graph visit: https://brainly.com/question/30954417.

#SPJ11

The factor of the \(18x^{2} -21x-15\) will be 3(3x-5)(2x+1).

Given quadratic equation is \(18x^{2} -21x-15\)

By taking 3 common from whole of the equation it becomes.

\(3(6x^{2} -7x-5)\)

now by factorization equation will be.

\(3(6x^{2} -10x+3x-5)\)

3[(2x(3x-5)+1(3x-5)]

Taking (3x-5) common from whole equation it will become

3(3x-5)(2x+1).

Hence the factor of the \(18x^{2} -21x-15\) will be 3(3x-5)(2x+1).

To know more about factorization follow.

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

The equivalent expression to the expression given; (x⁴y³y)² such that it takes the form; x^my^n is; x⁸• y⁸.

It follows from the task content that the given expression is; (x⁴y³y)².

Also, it is required that the expression be written such that we have an expression of the form; x^m y^n.

On this note, the equivalent expression can be determined by the laws of indices as follows;

= (x⁴y⁴)².

By distributing the exponent, then we have;

= x⁸• y⁸

Ultimately, the equivalent expression to the expression given; (x⁴y³y)² such that it takes the form; x^my^n is; x⁸• y⁸.

Read more on equivalent expressions;

https://brainly.com/question/14507158

#SPJ1

The correct answer is option a. $7,594.46.

To calculate the amount you would reduce the amount you owe in the first year, we can use the formula for the equal installment of a loan. The formula is:

Installment = Principal / Number of Installments + (Principal - Total Repaid) * Interest Rate

In this case, the principal is $45,000, the number of installments is 5, and the interest rate is 8.5%.

Let's calculate the amount you would reduce the amount you owe in the first year:

Installment = $45,000 / 5 + ($45,000 - $0) * 0.085Installment = $9,000 + $3,825

Installment = $12,825

Therefore, you would reduce the amount you owe by $12,825 in the first year.The correct answer is option a. $7,594.46.

Learn more about compound angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/33061695

#SPJ8

We are 99% confident that the true average stance duration among elderly individuals lies within the range of 744.56 ms to 857.44 ms.

To test whether the true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals, we can perform a one-tailed independent samples t-test. The null hypothesis (H0)

Using the t-test, we compare the means and standard deviations of the two samples and calculate the test statistic

a) To calculate a 99% confidence interval for the true average stance duration among elderly individuals, we can use the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and the t-distribution.

Given:

Older adults: n = 28, sample mean = 801, sample standard deviation = 117

Using the formula for a confidence interval for the mean, we have:

Margin of error = t * (sample standard deviation / √n)

Since the sample size is relatively large (n > 30), we can use the z-score instead of the t-score for a 99% confidence interval. The critical z-value for a 99% confidence level is approximately 2.576.

Calculating the margin of error:

Margin of error = 2.576 * (117 / √28) ≈ 56.44

The confidence interval is then calculated as:

Confidence interval = (sample mean - margin of error, sample mean + margin of error)

Confidence interval = (801 - 56.44, 801 + 56.44) ≈ (744.56, 857.44)

b) To test whether the true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals, we can perform a one-tailed independent samples t-test.

The null hypothesis (H0): The true average stance duration among elderly individuals is equal to or less than the true average stance duration among younger individuals.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha): The true average stance duration among elderly individuals is larger than the true average stance duration among younger individuals.

. With the given data, perform the t-test and obtain the p-value.

c) To construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means between older and younger adults, we can use the formula for the confidence interval of the difference in means.

Given:

Older adults: n1 = 28, sample mean1 = 801, sample standard deviation1 = 117

Younger adults: n2 = 16, sample mean2 = 780, sample standard deviation2 = 72

Calculating the standard error of the difference in means:

Standard error = √((s1^2 / n1) + (s2^2 / n2))

Standard error = √((117^2 / 28) + (72^2 / 16)) ≈ 33.89

Using the t-distribution and a 95% confidence level, the critical t-value (with degrees of freedom = n1 + n2 - 2) is approximately 2.048.

Calculating the margin of error:

Margin of error = t * standard error

Margin of error = 2.048 * 33.89 ≈ 69.29

The confidence interval is then calculated as:

Confidence interval = (mean1 - mean2 - margin of error, mean1 - mean2 + margin of error)

Confidence interval = (801 - 780 - 69.29, 801 - 780 + 69.29) ≈ (-48.29, 38.29)

Comparison with part (b): In part (b), we performed a one-tailed test to determine if the true average stance duration among elderly individuals is larger than among younger individuals. In part (c), the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means (-48.29, 38.29) includes zero. This suggests that we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the true average stance duration is significantly larger among elderly individuals compared to younger individuals at the 95% confidence level.

Know more about 99% confident here:

https://brainly.com/question/30762304

#SPJ11

True. When two linear transformations are performed one after another, the combined effect may not always be a linear transformation.

A linear transformation is a mapping between vector spaces that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. It satisfies two properties: linearity and preservation of the origin. When two linear transformations are composed, the resulting transformation is called the composition of the two transformations.

In general, the composition of two linear transformations will only be a linear transformation if the transformations are compatible in terms of their properties and operations.

However, if the transformations involve different operations or violate the properties of linearity, the resulting composition may not be a linear transformation.

∴ it is true that the combined effect of two linear transformations may not always be a linear transformation.

Learn more about Linear transformation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13595405

#SPJ11

Answer:

465.81

Step-by-step explanation:

nsxididjdjdisusjsj

The answer of the question is 465.81

Profitability index is 1.387. Thus, the correct option is (c) 1.387.

The formula for calculating the profitability index is:

P.I = PV of Future Cash Flows / Initial Investment

Where,

P.I is the profitability index

PV is the present value of future cash flows

The initial investment in the project is $30 million. The cash flow at the end of the first year is $2.85 million.

The present value of cash flows can be calculated using the formula:

PV = CF / (1 + r)ⁿ

Where,

PV is the present value of cash flows

CF is the cash flow in the given period

r is the discount rate

n is the number of periods

For the first-year cash flow, n = 1, CF = $2.85 million, and r = 11%.

Substituting the values, we get:

PV = 2.85 / (1 + 0.11)¹ = $2.56 million

To calculate the present value of all future cash flows, we can use the formula:

PV = CF / (r - g)

Where,

PV is the present value of cash flows

CF is the cash flow in the given period

r is the discount rate

g is the constant growth rate

For the subsequent years, CF = $2.85 million, r = 11%, and g = 3.85%.

Substituting the values, we get:

PV = 2.85 / (0.11 - 0.0385) = $39.90 million

The total present value of cash flows is the sum of the present value of the first-year cash flow and the present value of all future cash flows.

PV of future cash flows = $39.90 million + $2.56 million = $42.46 million

Profitability index (P.I) = PV of future cash flows / Initial investment

= 42.46 / 30

= 1.387

Therefore, the correct option is (c) 1.387.

Learn more about Profitability index

https://brainly.com/question/30641835

#SPJ11

The required,
(a) The missing terms of the first sequence are -7, 6, and 19.
(b) The missing terms of the second sequence are 71, 88, and 105.
(c) The missing terms of the third sequence are 2, -6, and -14.

Arithmetic progression is the series of numbers that have common differences between adjacent values

To find the missing terms of each arithmetic sequence, we need to use the formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence:

an = a₁ + (n - 1)d

where an is the nth term, a₁ is the first term, n is the number of terms, and d is a common difference.

Sequence 1,

a₁ = -20, an = 19

n = ? (unknown)

d = (an - a1) / (n - 1)

19 = -20 + (n - 1)d
39 = (n - 1)d

d = 39 / (n - 1)

We also know that a₂, a₃, and a₄ are missing, and there are four terms in total. Therefore, n = 4.

d = 39 / (4 - 1) = 13

Using the formula, we can now find the missing terms:

a₂ = a₁ + d = -20 + 13 = -7

a₃ = a₂ + d = -7 + 13 = 6

a₄ = a₃ + d = 6 + 13 = 19

So the missing terms of the first sequence are -7, 6, and 19.

Similarly,

The missing terms of the second sequence are 71, 88, and 105.
The missing terms of the third sequence are 2, -6, and -14.

Learn more about arithmetic progression here: https://brainly.com/question/20334860
#SPJ9

Answer:

x² - 16x + 49 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

If a polynomial has roots a and b, then the polynomial is (x - a)(x - b).

[x - (8 + √15)][x - (8 - √15)] = 0

[(x - 8) - √15][(x - 8) + √15] = 0

(x - 8)² - (√15)² = 0

x² - 16x + 64 - 15 = 0

x² - 16x + 49 = 0

The missing number of the series is 21.

The given sequence appears to follow the pattern of the Fibonacci sequence, where each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers. The Fibonacci sequence starts with 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is obtained by adding the two previous numbers.

Using this pattern, we can determine the missing number in the sequence.

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, -, 34, 55

Looking at the pattern, we can see that the missing number is obtained by adding 8 and 13, which gives us 21.

Therefore, the completed sequence is:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55.

To learn more about number here:

https://brainly.com/question/32210789

#SPJ4

The missing number in the sequence 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, -, 34, 55 is 21.

To find the missing number in the sequence 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, -, 34, 55, we can observe that each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers. This pattern is known as the Fibonacci sequence.

The Fibonacci sequence starts with 0 and 1. To generate the next number, we add the two preceding numbers: 0 + 1 = 1. Continuing this pattern, we get:

Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is 21.

About fill in here:

https://brainly.com/question/182137

#SPJ11