which obstacle is currently the most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in china?
The most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in China is the lack of accountability and transparency in government and industry practices.
The most serious obstacle to the enforcement of clean water laws in China is the lack of accountability and transparency in government and industry practices.
There are also issues with insufficient funding and inadequate monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. Additionally, the rapid economic development and urbanization in China have led to increased pollution and water scarcity, which further exacerbate the challenges in enforcing clean water laws.
Local officials often prioritize economic development over environmental protection, leading to lax enforcement of clean water regulations.
Additionally, corruption among local authorities can hinder the enforcement of these laws. Lastly, limited resources and funding for regulatory agencies make it challenging to monitor and enforce clean water laws effectively.
Know more about clean water laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/14284975
#SPJ11
Contracts related to an interest in land fall within the statute of frauds.
True/false
The statement "Contracts related to an interest in land are subject to the statute of frauds. " is true.
The statute of frauds is a legal doctrine that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable.It prevents fraudulent claims and misunderstandings. It covers contracts for the sale of real property, as well as contracts to create an interest in real property, such as leases and mortgages.
The written contract must contain a description of the property, the price, and the terms of the sale. Other types of contracts related to an interest in land, such as leases and mortgages, must also be in writing and signed by the parties.
Contracts related to an interest in land are subject to the statute of frauds because they involve significant legal rights and interests. The statute of frauds is designed to protect those interests by requiring written contracts that are clear and unambiguous.
For more such questions on frauds visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23294592
#SPJ8
A penny can be used in which part of vehicle maintenance?
A: checking oil level
B: checking tire tread depth
C: monitoring emissions
D: checking brake fluid
Answer:
Make sure your tires have enough tread. You can use a penny to do it, or look out for the wear indicators on the tire treads. If anything's out of the ordinary, don't ignore it.
What do you think of the court decision in the Hustler Magazine v. Moral Majority
case?
Do you agree with the court's decision that the Moral Majority's
use of the Hustler parody ad was fair use?
In the Hustler Magazine v. Moral Majority case, the court's decision was in favor of the defendant, ruling that the Moral Majority's use of the Hustler parody ad was fair use. The court determined that the ad was transformative in nature, using the original work to criticize and comment on the political views of Hustler's publisher, Larry Flynt. As a result, the use of the parody ad did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.The court's decision in this case is generally seen as a victory for the fair use doctrine and free speech. It reaffirmed that parody is a legitimate form of expression and that the use of copyrighted material for the purpose of parody does not necessarily constitute infringement. While some may have disagreed with the moral or political message conveyed by the parody ad, the court recognized that such criticism and commentary is an important part of the public discourse.In conclusion, I agree with the court's decision in this case. The parody ad was clearly transformative in nature and did not compete with the original work. Instead, it used the original work to comment on a matter of public concern. As such, it was a legitimate exercise of free speech and did not infringe on Hustler's copyright.
For more question like Court Decision visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28038485
#SPJ11
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
How does a counterclaim help support a position in an argumentative essay?
Answer:
A counterclaim helps support the writer position in an argumentative essay because The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect, as you write, think about your audience.
Answer:
The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect.
Explanation:
edge 2021
HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What does the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act do?
It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can collect.
It limits the data that children under 13 can access.
It lets children under 13 access only educational sites.
It limits the data that websites aimed at children under 13 can collect.
Answer:
I think the answer is "It limits the data that websites aimed at children's under 13 can collect."
Answer: It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can access
Explanation: just did test
How might limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes affect schools
Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools may impact nutrient intake, culinary variety, cost-effectiveness, and cultural authenticity of meals.
How limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools impact nutrition, culinary variety, costs, and cultural considerations?Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes in schools can have various effects. Here are some potential impacts:
Nutritional considerations: Starchy vegetables like potatoes can be a significant source of carbohydrates, fiber, and certain vitamins and minerals. Limiting these vegetables may result in reduced nutrient intake among students, particularly if suitable alternative options are not provided. It is important to ensure that any limitations on starchy vegetables are accompanied by a diverse range of nutritious alternatives to maintain a balanced diet.Culinary variety and student preferences: Potatoes are a versatile ingredient used in various dishes, and they may be popular among students. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could potentially reduce the culinary variety offered in school meals, leading to fewer options and potentially impacting student satisfaction and food preferences.Cost considerations: Potatoes are often considered a cost-effective food item, which can be beneficial for schools operating within budget constraints. If starchy vegetables are limited, schools may need to explore alternative options, which could potentially lead to increased costs for sourcing and preparing other vegetables or ingredients.Cultural and regional considerations: Potatoes hold cultural significance in many regions, and certain cuisines heavily rely on them as a staple ingredient. Limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes could impact the cultural authenticity of meals served in schools, particularly in communities where potatoes are traditionally consumed.Learn more about Limiting starchy vegetables
brainly.com/question/20859432
#SPJ11
Jana had a checkup with her obstetrician, and the doctor prescribed a treatment of progesterone.
What is the MOST LIKELY reason Jana would be prescribed progesterone?
a. She has PMDD.
b. She has had amenorrhea.
c. She is taking fertility treatments.
d. She is experiencing labor.
Answer:
Explanation:
i think b
Answer:
C. She is taking fertility treatments.
Discuss one way English Common Law has influenced our modern democratic institutions and procedures.
The right to one's own privacy may be traced back to English common law just as much as it can be found in the Constitution. This is one of the reasons why the 9th and 10th Amendments were included in the Constitution. They are around in part because of the common law that existed before it.
This is further explained below.
What is the right to privacy?Generally, The concept of an individual's inalienable right to privacy may be found in a number of different legal systems. This right is designed to put a stop to governmental and private acts that violate the privacy of persons. The right to one's privacy is recognized in more than 150 country constitutions.
In conclusion, the right of an individual not to have things of a personal nature made public against their will or to be the subject of intrusion by other people.
Read more about the right to privacy
https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ1
Are two cases every really identical? Let's take a look at the cases below.
Jonathan H is arrested and convicted of robbing a gas station attendant at gunpoint. He takes lottery tickets and $400 in cash.
Debra J. is arrested and convicted of robbing an Uber driver at gunpoint. She takes $450 in cash.
Debra is sentenced to 3 years of formal probation and she has to do 100 hours of community service and pay restitution to the Uber driver.
Jonathan is sentenced to 3 years in state prison.
Do you think the sentence differences are fair? If not, explain why. (5 points)
List at least four reasons why the sentences might be different. For each of your reasons, tell us why that reason should make a difference in the punishment. (20 points)
what are some examples of equity
Answer: In simple terms, owner's equity is defined as the amount of money invested by the owner in the business minus any money taken out by the owner of the business. For example: If a real estate project is valued at $500,000 and the loan amount due is $400,000, the amount of owner's equity, in this case, is $100,000.
Explanation:
Freire’s notion of praxis
Can a 16-year-old convicted of murder receive the death penalty
Answer: no why?
Explanation:
Answer:
yes.
Explanation:
Children can face death as punishment for their crimes. Girls as young as nine can be sentenced to death, but boys have to be at least 15 years old. There were reports made in 2014 that 14 people were executed in Iran for crimes they allegedly committed when they were under the age of 18.
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
All individuals on a motorcycle are required by law to wear a helmet which is approved by the DOT, fits snugly, and is tightly fastened.
The given statement "All individuals on a motorcycle are required by law to wear a helmet which is approved by the DOT, fits snugly, and is tightly fastened." is True because this requirement is in place in many jurisdictions and serves to promote safety and reduce the risk of head injuries in motorcycle accidents.
Helmets approved by the DOT meet specific safety standards and undergo rigorous testing to ensure their effectiveness in protecting riders' heads. Wearing a properly fitting helmet that is securely fastened is crucial because it provides crucial head protection by absorbing and distributing the force of impacts, reducing the risk of severe head trauma in the event of a crash or collision.
The enforcement of helmet laws aims to promote safe riding practices and prevent potential fatalities or life-altering injuries. Wearing an approved helmet that fits correctly and is securely fastened is not only a legal requirement but also a proactive measure to prioritize rider safety on the road.
To know more about helmet refer here
brainly.com/question/2690491
#SPJ11
Complete Question : All individuals on a motorcycle are required by law to wear a helmet which is approved by the DOT, fits snugly, and is tightly fastened. True/false.
jane is an 18 year old softball player within a public school district. while playing a home game at mytown high school, jane broke her ankle sliding into third base. she is suing the school district and her coach for negligence. discuss the three (3) strongest defenses the defendants could use.
The three (3) strongest defenses the defendants ought to use: accidents are a fact of gambling sports activities. but, as a good deal as viable, golf equipment, coaches, and faculties are liable for minimizing harm and dangers.
Contributory negligence, comparative fault, and assumption of threat. Installation with the aid of the pupil nurses on campus
The human frame has three number-one strains of defense to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, such as viruses, microorganisms, and fungi. The immune system's 3 lines of protection include bodily and chemical limitations, non-specific innate responses, and specific adaptive responses.
If defense outcomes in an acquittal, it is referred to as ideal protection. The distinction between the 2 is giant. A defendant who's a success with imperfect protection is still responsible against the law; a defendant who is successful with perfect protection is harmless.
Learn more about defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/23573204
#SPJ4
What is Law? Describe with example
Answer:
law is the rule of something. for eg cyber law, public law , etc.
Texas law requires that all ___ take the driving skills exam to receive a drivers license
Why did the correctional population of USA Increased dramatically between 1980 and 2014
Answer: It WAS because people who went to prison served more time
The biggest reason the prison population exploded, especially after 1990: more people were in prison for longer periods of time. This is also largely due to changes in sentencing policy.
Explanation:
urisdiction gives federal courts the authority to hear certain kinds of cases. to make decisions based on the law. to hear arguments from different parties. to make decisions based on precedents.
The jurisdiction provides federal courts with the ability to hear particular types of lawsuits. It offers them the power to make decisions based on the law.
Jurisdiction is the authority given to the federal courts to hear specific types of cases, which means they can make decisions based on the law. The authority may be granted by the constitution or by legislation. Jurisdiction can be of different types, such as exclusive jurisdiction, concurrent jurisdiction, original jurisdiction, or appellate jurisdiction.
Exclusive jurisdiction indicates that only a federal court has the authority to hear a particular case. Concurrent jurisdiction, on the other hand, allows state and federal courts to have the authority to hear certain cases. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority to hear a case first before any other court, while appellate jurisdiction means the power to review a lower court’s decision. In all cases, the court is expected to hear arguments from different parties and make decisions based on precedents.
Learn more about jurisdiction from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor to build an apartment over an existing garage. The action turned on the scope of the work covered by the contract. The contractor and the homeowner were the only witnesses at the bench trial, and they strongly disagreed about the scope of the work. At the end of the trial, the judge stated findings of fact on the record but never issued a written opinion. Neither party objected to the findings. The judge found in favor of the homeowner, and the contractor appealed. Is the appellate court likely to overturn the findings?
Answer:
No, because the appellate court must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
Explanation:
Appellate courts or appeal courts are those that are empowered to review judgements that have been given at trial by lower courts.
Appeal courts exist at the state and federal level and they do not use a jury to review judgements.
In the given instance the construction contractor and home owner did not disagree on the findings of the trial judge and never issued a written opinion.
The appeal court is not likely to overturn the findings because they must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
The trial judge should give a written opinion on the matter before the appeal court can delibrate
the distance a vehicle traveles from the time the driver applies the brakes until the vehicle stops is the
The distance a vehicle travels from the time the driver applies the brakes until the vehicle stops is the Braking Distance.
The distance your car travels after using the brakes until it comes to a total stop is known as the braking distance. The sum of the response and braking distances is the total stopping distance. The average person thinks for one-fifth of a second before reacting and applying the brakes for the final one-fifth of a second. Because of this, it is generally advised that drivers leave two seconds between themselves and other drivers. The two-second safe driving space rule is designed to ensure that there is adequate space between your vehicle and the vehicle in front of you for you to stop or divert around it if it abruptly stops. One of the two main factors that make up the total braking distance is the braking distance. The response distance, which is also a factor, is the result of the driver's or rider's speed and perception-reaction time.
Learn more about braking distance here
https://brainly.com/question/29546968
#SPJ4
which of the following has the highest authoritative weight? multiple choice A. action on decision
B. legislative regulatio
C. n private letter
D. ruling revenue procedure
The answer is D. ruling revenue procedure. Ruling revenue procedures have the highest authoritative weight as they are issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and carry the force of law.
Legislative regulations are also authoritative but they are not issued by the IRS. Private letters and action on decision do not carry authoritative weight as they are not public rulings. Additionally, revenue is the income generated by a company or government from its normal business activities. Legislative regulation Legislative regulations have the highest authoritative weight among the given choices because they are issued by a government agency and have the force of law. These regulations help implement and interpret the statutes passed by the legislative branch, and they often provide guidance on revenue collection and management.
To know more about revenue, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16232387
#SPJ11
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
which is the most widely used federally illegal drug in the united states?
The most widely used federally illegal drug in the United States is marijuana.
How much is this drug used ?According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, an estimated 48.2 million people in the United States aged 12 or older used marijuana in 2020. This represents 18.8% of the population aged 12 or older.
Marijuana is a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, which means that it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. However, there is growing evidence that marijuana has potential medical benefits, and several states have legalized marijuana for medical use. In addition, 18 states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for recreational use.
Find out more on illegal drugs at https://brainly.com/question/1287072
#SPJ4
Is it legal for a shooter to catch his/her own shot off of the rebounder/frame?.
Yes, it is legal for a shooter to catch his/her own shot off of the rebounder/frame if they follow the rules of the game and meet the requirements for the use of a rebounder.
A rebounder is a device used in basketball to help players improve their shooting skills. It is a rectangular frame with a net or bungee cords attached to it, which returns the ball back to the player after it is shot.
A rebounder is a training device that helps basketball player improve their rebounding skills. A basketball player has to be able to catch the ball after it has bounced off the rim or backboard.
A rebounder is used to simulate these situations in practice. Rebounders are available in different sizes and styles to suit different players’ needs and preferences.
They can be used for solo practice or team training sessions. A rebounder is a valuable tool for basketball players who want to improve their skills.
Learn more about rebounder from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/21272179
#SPJ11
Which of the following amendments concern bail for arrested suspects?
Group of answer choices
Answer:
it might be amendment 4 or 6
Explanation:
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
What governmental policy could be developed to avoid funneling low-income defendants in the criminal justice system for the sake of revenue?