Answers
Courts that have jurisdiction over cases involving violations of federal laws, including civil rights abuses, interstate transportation of stolen property, and kidnappings are called federal district courts.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction over a wide range of cases involving federal laws, including civil and criminal cases. Civil cases may involve disputes between individuals, organizations, or the government that arise from federal laws, such as cases related to civil rights violations, intellectual property, bankruptcy, and taxation.
Criminal cases may involve violations of federal laws, such as cases related to drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering, and other federal offenses.
Federal district courts are located in various geographic regions across the United States and its territories. There are 94 federal district courts, each serving a specific district or territory. Each federal district court is presided over by one or more district judges who are appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate.
These judges are responsible for overseeing trials, interpreting federal laws, and issuing rulings and judgments in cases within their jurisdiction.
It's important to note that federal district courts are part of the federal judiciary and have authority over cases involving federal laws, while state and local courts have authority over cases involving state and local laws.
The federal district courts play a critical role in the U.S. legal system by ensuring the fair and impartial administration of justice in cases involving violations of federal laws.
To learn more about administration, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/29994801
#SPJ11
Related Questions
ALAP
What is law really
Answers
Which of the following negatively affects the government's expenditure on various future obligations?
A surplus in the government revenue
Inflation in the economy
Lags in government policies
Interest on borrowed funds
Fluctuations in the business cycle
Answers
Interest on borrowed funds negatively affects the government's expenditure on various future obligations. Thus, option (d) is correct.
The cost of interest on borrowed money increases the government's debt and lowers the amount of money available to meet future obligations when the government borrows money.
Government spending on various future responsibilities may not necessarily be negatively impacted by a surplus in revenue, economic inflation, delays in implementing government plans, and business cycle swings.
Therefore, option (d) is correct.
Learn more about on government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ12
__________ allows plaintiffs to seek compensatory and punitive damages when an organization engages in intentional discrimination with malice or reckless indifference.
Answers
Answer:Eeo
Explanation:
A vehicle skids across an asphalt surface for 72 feet before entering onto the grassy shoulder of the highway where it continues for 47 feet and strikes a tree at an impact speed of 15 miles per hour. Test skids were conducted on the asphalt surface in the direction of the skids at 30 miles per hour with a test vehicle. The longest recorded skid mark from two tests within tolerance was measured at 43 feet. A drag sled weighing 30 Is was pulled along the grassy shoulder in the direction of the skids with an average pull force of 17 Ibs. recorded. The vehicle had 100% braking at the time of brake application. The grade along the asphalt roadway was level but the grade along the shoulder was measured at a -2%. What was the speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes?
Answers
The speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes was approximately 43.4 mph.
How did we get the value?To determine the speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes, use the formula:
v² = u² + 2as
where:
v = final velocity (impact speed of 15 mph)
u = initial velocity (what we want to find)
a = acceleration
s = distance
First, we need to find the acceleration (a) of the vehicle on the asphalt surface. Apply the formula:
a = F/m
where:
F = force (100% braking)
m = mass of the vehicle
The mass of the vehicle is unknown, but apply the drag sled experiment to estimate the coefficient of friction between the grassy shoulder and the vehicle:
μ = F/N
where:
μ = coefficient of friction
F = average pull force on drag sled (17 Ibs)
N = weight of the drag sled (30 Ibs)
Assume that the coefficient of friction between the asphalt surface and the vehicle is the same as the coefficient of friction between the grassy shoulder and the drag sled. Therefore:
μ = F/N = 17/30 = 0.57
Now, use the formula for acceleration:
a = μg
where:
g = acceleration due to gravity (32.2 ft/s²)
a = 0.57 x 32.2 = 18.37 ft/s²
Next, we can calculate the distance (s) that the vehicle skidded on the asphalt surface:
s = longest recorded skid mark = 43 feet
Finally, use the formula for final velocity:
v^2 = u² + 2as
15² = u² + 2 x 18.37 x 72
u² = 15² - 2 x 18.37 x 72
u = 63.6 ft/s
To convert to miles per hour:
u = 63.6 x 3600 / 5280 = 43.4 mph
Therefore, the speed of the vehicle at the time the driver applied the brakes was approximately 43.4 mph.
learn more about speed: https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ1
Is this statement true or false? the 14th amendment weakened the power of the states. It gave the federal government the power to protect individual rights.
Answers
Answer:
It is true . .. . . . .
The statement given here is true related to 14th Amendment in the U.S.A Constitution.
What was the 14th Amendment?The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which was ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”
This amendment became the milestone for many Supreme Court decisions in U.S.A in near future.
The amendment came with the aim of abolishing slavery and conferring civil and legal rights to black Americans.
What is U.S.A Constitution?The Constitution of U.S.A is the law of land for the country through which all the legal rights and duties drew their power.
The precursor to the U.S.A Constitution is the Articles of the Confederation. It is regarded as the oldest codified Constitution in the world.
Introduced in 1789, the Constitution has total 7 Articles and has been amended 27 times.
What is the 14th Amendment?This amendment was passed on June 13 1866 and ratified on July 9 1868. The amendment extended Civil rights to formerly enslaved people.
A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,” thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.
Also it stated that “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.
the 14th Amendment authorized the federal government to punish states that violated or abridged their citizens’ right to vote by proportionally reducing the states’ representation in Congress
It also mandated that anyone who “engaged in insurrection” against the United States could not hold civil, military or elected office (without the approval of two-thirds of the House and Senate).
It also upheld the national debt, but exempted federal and state governments from paying any debts incurred by the former Confederate states
To learn more about the 14th Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/12683660
#SPJ3
Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer
Answers
with reference to the life of ministry of Jesus identify activities which shows that he was a worker
Answers
Answer:
Jesus was a "Blue-collar" construction worker. He also, performed miracles for His fellow disciples and, for the people who followed Him.
Explanation: Found My source online.
Govt FRQ
While the Constitution creates three separate but equal branches of government, recently many experts have argued that the executive branch has grown to such an extent that it now dominates the government superseding the legislature. Explain the rise of the executive branch using your understanding of the three branches, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
(Use complete sentences and construct an argument as your introduction. Provide evidence in favor of your argument in your supporting paragraph(s).
PLEASE HELP ME I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT PLSS
Answers
There is a growing argument among experts that the executive branch of the government has expanded significantly in recent years, leading to a dominant role that supersedes the legislature.
In this response, we will explore the factors contributing to the rise of the executive branch, considering the three branches of government, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
Supporting Paragraph:
One factor contributing to the rise of the executive branch is the expansion of executive powers granted by the Constitution & federal bureaucracy.and interpreted through judicial rulings. The Constitution designates specific powers to each branch, but over time, the interpretation of these powers has expanded, particularly in the executive branch's favor. For example, the "necessary and proper" clause and the "commerce clause" have been broadly interpreted to grant the executive branch authority to implement policies and regulations that impact various aspects of society.
However, it is important to ensure a proper balance of powers and uphold the principles of checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of our democratic system.
To learn more about federal bureaucracy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29614668
#SPJ4
what type of contract is a license holder prohibited from completing because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law?
Answers
A license holder is prohibited from completing a type of contract because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law. The type of contract is a "fill-in-the-blank" contract.
Fill-in-the-blank contracts are contracts in which blanks are left for the user to fill in with terms and information that are specific to the contract's subject matter. The user then completes the contract by filling in the blanks with the necessary information.
The main problem with fill-in-the-blank contracts is that they are a one-size-fits-all approach to contracts, and they do not take into account the unique circumstances and needs of each party.The unauthorized practice of law occurs when someone who is not a licensed attorney or a licensed legal service provider engages in activities that are reserved for attorneys or legal service providers. Completing a fill-in-the-blank contract is considered the unauthorized practice of law because it involves the interpretation and application of legal terms, which is a legal service that is reserved for licensed attorneys.
To know more about licensed visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15829119
#SPJ11
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking are which partners responsibility?A. Federal governmentB. State governmentC. Local governmentD. Private sector
Answers
Answer:B
Explanation:
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Thus option (B) is correct.
What is government?A government is the political system by which a country or community is administered and regulated. The most of the key words commonly used to describe governments are monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy.
A government is a system of order for a nation, state, or another political unit. A government is responsible for creating and enforcing the rules of a society, defense, foreign affairs, the economy, and public services.
While the responsibilities of all governments are similar, those duties are executed in different ways depending on the form of government.
Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.
Critical infrastructure such as utilities and banking is responsibility of State government. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about government here:
brainly.com/question/17166802
#SPJ6
the most common form of consequence-oriented reasoning is known as
Answers
Answer:
the fathers of utilitarianism.
Explanation:
utilitarianism the most common form of consequence oriented reasoning, in which the good resides in the promotion of happiness or the greatest net increase of pleasure over pain.
Answer:
Utilitarianism
Explanation:
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally
Answers
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.
Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.
Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.
In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.
Know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33013975
#SPJ8
What is the highest rank achievable in the United States Army Special Forces, as an officer, and what are all the ranks.
Answers
Answer:
five-star general
The highest military rank is O-10, or "five-star general." It is symbolized by five stars for each of the military services.
Explanation:
__________ is a form of __________ on the basis of sex and is
illegal under federal law.
Sexual harassment, slander
Sexual orientation, discrimination
Sexual harassment, libel
Answers
The answer is Sexual harassment, slander. Sexual harassment, is a form of slander on the basis of sex and is illegal under federal law.
A form of harassment known as sexual harassment uses overt or covert sexual references, as well as unwanted and inappropriate offers of incentives in exchange for sexual favours. From verbal indiscretions to sexual abuse or assault, sexual harassment covers a wide spectrum of behaviours.Harassment can happen in a variety of social contexts, including the workplace, the family, schools, and places of worship. Any sex or gender might be a victim or a harasser. Sexual harassment is forbidden under current legal regulations. Due to the fact that sexual harassment laws do not impose a "general civility code," they sometimes do not outlaw simple taunting, casual remarks, or minor isolated incidences.
Read more about sex discrimination at
https://brainly.com/question/31916116
#SPJ4
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific reference to the law of contract, discuss.
Answers
sorry....too complex for a non law student
If a state were to have the majority of its productive capacity in the public sector, this would most likely indicate the existence of a(n):
Answers
Answer: D. social market system.
Explanation:
I'm a social market system, the economy runs as an amalgamation of two economic policies being the capitalist system and the socialist system.
The goal of this is to improve the welfare of humans whilst still encouraging competition. As a result, most of the country's productive sector will be in the public sector where the government tries to institute it's ideals of trying to improve the general welfare of the people.
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answers
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
Washoe Medical Center, Inc., admitted Shirley Swisher for the treatment of a fractured pelvis. During her stay, Swisher suffered a fatal fall from her hospital bed. Gerald Parodi, the administrator of her estate, and others filed an action against Washoe seeking damages for the alleged lack of care in treating Swisher. During voir dire, when the plaintiffs’ attorney returned a few minutes late from a break, the trial judge led the prospective jurors in a standing ovation. Later during voir dire, the judge joked with one of the prospective jurors, whom he had known in college, about his fitness to serve as a judge and personally endorsed another prospective juror’s business. After the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Washoe. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, but the judge denied the motion. The plaintiffs then appealed, arguing that the tone set by the judge during voir dire prejudiced their right to a fair trial. Should the appellate court agree? Why or why not? E
Answers
Answer:
Shirley Swisher Vs Washoe Medical Center, Inc.
The tone and conduct of the trial judge were inappropriate and they also prejudice the plaintiffs' right to a fair trial.
Based on the above, the appellate court should agree with the plaintiffs. The case should be remanded for retrial by another judge.
Explanation:
The overt behavior of joking with a juror in addition to the outspoken remarks, by leading a standing ovation, the trial judge will certainly cause the jurors to render verdicts that may not be balanced, fair, and objective. The judge did not act professionally as a neutral arbitrator in the case. He is supposed to provide the correct environment for a fair trial and not to constitute a source of public nuisance. By his conduct, he caused the jurors to return a verdict against Shirley Swisher. Instead of acting as a neutral arbiter, he became an involved party, forcing the jurors to take his sides.
Larry is told by Moe that Curly stole his prized business law book from his car. The next day Larry confronts Curly and slaps him repeatedly for stealing his book. Curly had Larry arrested for slapping him. Larry sues Curly for damages in the amount of the book and for maliciously having him arrested. Claiming that he lied, Curly sues Moe for defamation. The lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book involves which of the following?
a. Public law.
b. Private law.
c. Administrative law.
d. Both public and private law.
Answers
Answer:
i think its D
Explanation:
Both public and private law as the lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book. Hence, option D is correct.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is a civil legal proceeding in which one party files a claim against another the defendant, and the court makes the final decision.
Depending on the remedy sought and the jurisdiction where the plaintiff filed the complaint, a lawsuit filed in court to seek relief from or a remedy for a claimed injury may be tried by a court of law or a court of equity.
A lawsuit typically involves issues like breach of contract, financial difficulties, bodily harm, or property damage. The purpose of a lawsuit is for the plaintiff to demand that the defendant make amends for the wrongdoing or pay damages.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SPJ2
correct way to refer to the south african constitution
Answers
Answer:
Explanation: The Constitution is formally entitled the "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996." It was previously also numbered as if it were an Act of Parliament—Act No. 108 of 1996—but, since the passage of the Citation of Constitutional Laws Act, neither it nor the acts amending it are allocated act numbers.
What is Legal Process of Khula in Pakistan
Answers
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed
Explanation:
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
Write a two- to three-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast the structure and function of the national government with the structure and function of New Hampshire's/States government. Use what you’ve learned about the national government and do research to find out more about your state government. Include the following in your essay:
The structure of national and state government
The functions of national and state government
The distribution of power between national and state government, including the purpose of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution
Current state leaders and the roles and functions they perform within state government
Answers
National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution defined by the U.S. Constitution.
The Essay
The national government and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.
New Hampshire's current state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.
Learn more about structure of government at:
https://brainly.com/question/22236084
#SPJ1
All federal statutory laws are part of the
A. United States Code
B. state constitutions
C. U.S. Constitution
D. regulatory agencies
SUBMIT
Answers
Can one gene affect multiple traits?
Answers
Yes, Pleitropy is the phenomenon by which one gene can affect multiple traits.
Pleiotropy, or the occurrence in which a single gene adds to multiple phenotypic traits, was the cause of Mendel's observations.
Gregor Mendel made multiple interesting observations about the colour of plant components while studying inheritance in pea plants.
Mendel discovered that plants with coloured seed coats always had coloured flowers and leaf axils. (Axils are plant parts that connect leaves to stems.)
Mendel also noticed that pea plants with colourless seed coats had white flowers with no pigmentation on their axils. In other words, seed coat colour was always linked to specific flower and axil colours in Mendel's pea plants.
To know more about Pleitropy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6984886
#SPJ4
i wamt to be a laweyr
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The process of becoming a lawyer
How to Become a Lawyer
Complete a Bachelor's Degree Program. A bachelor's degree is the minimum educational requirement for admission to law school. ...
Pass the Law School Admission Test. ...
Identify Law Schools and Complete Applications. ...
Earn a Juris Doctor Degree. ...
Pass the Bar Examination. ...
Advance Your Career.
Provide TWO (2) examples or situations that
prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less
stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing
country (e.g., laws r
Answers
TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.
Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.
Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.
It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.
Learn more about tax loopholes
https://brainly.com/question/7227568
#SPJ11
What is the purpose of a grand jury?
Answers
The United States and Liberia are the only countries that retain grand juries,though other common law jurisdictions formerly employed them, and most others now employ a different procedure that does not involve a jury: a preliminary hearing. Grand juries perform both accusatory and investigatory functions. The investigatory functions of grand juries include obtaining and reviewing documents and other evidence, and hearing sworn testimonies of witnesses who appear before it; the accusatory function determines whether there is probable cause to believe that one or more persons committed a particular offense within the venue of a district court.
A grand jury in the United States is usually composed of 16 to 23 citizens, though in Virginia it has fewer members for regular or special grand juries. In Ireland, they also functioned as local government authorities. In Japan, the Law of July 12, 1948, created the Kensatsu Shinsakai (Prosecutorial Review Commission or PRC system), inspired by the American system.
The grand jury is so named because traditionally it has more jurors than a trial jury, sometimes called a petit jury (from the French word petit meaning "small")
The purpose of a grand jury is to ascertain if there is reason to think that one or more people committed a specific Federal offense within the district court's jurisdiction.
A grand jury's role is to accuse those who may be guilty of a crime, but it also serves as a safeguard against unfair and unjust prosecution. It provides an opportunity for community members to engage in the administration of justice as lay citizens. Additionally, it has the ability to show data on local crime and poor administration. A grand jury typically consists of 23 people.
Two different forms of written statements are used as the accusation method: Either in a formal manner (indictment) outlining the offense with the appropriate accompaniments of time and occasion, the certainty of deed and person, or in a less formal manner (presentment), which is typically the grand jury's spontaneous act.
Learn more about grand jury, here;
https://brainly.com/question/1927043
#SPJ6
When an appellate court receives a case appealed to it, it will:
a. Retry the case with a new jury.
b. Review the jury's verdict to see if the appellate court judges would have reached the same result.
c. Retry the case with the appellate court judge acting as the jury.
d. Review the record of the trial court to see if there were any errors of law made by the judge.
Answers
When an appellate court receives a case appealed to it, it will is review the record of the trial court to see if there were any errors of law made by the judge.
When an appellate court receives a case appealed to it, it does not retry the case or act as a new jury. Instead, the appellate court reviews the record of the trial court to determine if there were any errors of law made by the judge that affected the outcome of the case. The appellate court does not reweigh the evidence or make determinations of fact, but rather focuses on legal issues such as the interpretation of statutes or the application of legal precedents. The appellate court may affirm, reverse, or remand the case back to the trial court for further proceedings based on its review.
Learn more about appellate here:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ4
How did the Anti-Federalists feel about presidential power?
Answers
The Anti-Federalists about presidential power tend to oppose the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution which is mainly because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and would threaten individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification while believing that the power should thus be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government. Thus, they tend to worry that a stronger federal government would be prone to tyranny.
However, this happened because these Anti-Federalists believed that this new Constitution did not include adequate protections which would be for the rights of the individuals and the states.
To learn more about the Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ4
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities. In the past three years, it has issued over $2 billion in securities, and $1 billion of those securities are in the hands of the public. This very large enterprise:
Answers
Answer:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.