Positive:
-It makes new goods faster
-It creates employment opportunities
Negative:
-There are unskilled labour and lack of modern machineries die to which the standard of goods decrease
- Child labour is banned and so trade embargo can be applied
- The work time is long and salary is less
You can elaborate these points more, as you wish
Question 9 of 20
Which statement best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over
direct democracy?
A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
C. It can better prevent political leaders from serving their own
interests.
D. It can help citizens feel more connected to the government.
SUBMIT
The statement that best describes an advantage of indirect democracy over direct democracy is B. It can increase the efficiency of decision making.
How is indirect democracy better than direct ?Representative democracy, also referred as indirect democracy, is a governance structure where citizens pick and commission representatives who are responsible for making policies and passing legislation on their behalf.
Unlike direct democracy, wherein citizens themselves make decisions through votes, such an approach in tailored for increased efficiency in governmental decision-making. It is essential to note that both methods of governance have pros and cons ;however, the representation offers better time management and division of labor than the direct form of democracy.
Find out more on indirect democracy at https://brainly.com/question/855602
#SPJ1
Which characteristic does not define the new supporters of the Democratic party?
Can someone help
Me match them
To the correct one please ASAP
Answer:
humans are born with free will and the ability to use reason---> limited government
gods grant leaders the power to rule------> divine rights of kings
kings or queens have complete control over the government---> absolute monarchy
even the king must obey the law------> natural law
hope this helps. thanks for using brainly
Help pls thank u whoever helped me
Nationalism and globalization both have different outcomes and only one cannot be favored. Both nationalism and globalization are both sides of the same coin and therefore both are compatible.
Globalization undermines national identity due to the fact that the cross-border flow of information makes it harder for any single national identity to retain its unique significance and distinguish itself from other national identities.
Globalization is the way to enhance the trade relations between any two countries. It is the medium to eliminate global trade barriers. Whereas nationalism refers to having one's own country above that of others. Globalisation and Nationalism derive their essence from key ideological bases.
Learn more about globalization, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ1
the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determing the status of slavery in kansas and nebraska resulted in: A. proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. B. abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. C. the supreme court legalizing slavery throughout the united states. D. southern leaders refusing to acknowlegde kansas or nebraska as states.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska resulted in proslavery and antislavery groups fighting to influence the elections. Option A
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 essentially repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in the territories north of the 36°30' latitude line.
This decision allowed for the possibility of slavery expanding into new territories, and both proslavery and antislavery groups saw the importance of influencing the elections in order to either secure or prevent the expansion of slavery.
The proslavery groups, which were largely composed of southern Democrats, saw the Kansas-Nebraska Act as an opportunity to expand the institution of slavery and strengthen their power in Congress.
They sent thousands of proslavery settlers into Kansas to vote in the elections and ensure that slavery would be allowed in the territory. The antislavery groups, on the other hand, saw the expansion of slavery as a threat to their values and fought to prevent it.
They encouraged northerners to move to Kansas and vote against slavery, leading to clashes and violence between the two groups.
The decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska did not result in abolitionists encouraging uprisings of enslaved people throughout the territories. Additionally, it did not result in the Supreme Court legalizing slavery throughout the United States.
However, southern leaders did refuse to acknowledge Kansas or Nebraska as states, as they were perceived as being sympathetic to the abolitionist cause.
Overall, the decision to allow the 1854 elections to determine the status of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska had significant political and social implications.
It further intensified the sectional tensions between the North and South, and set the stage for the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. So Option A is correct.
For more question on antislavery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29418929
#SPJ11
Draw Inferences Choose one of the items you learned about. Explain
how the history of the hemisphere that item traveled to would be different if
the Columbian Exchange had not happened.
if the Columbian Exchange had not brought maize to Europe, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to would have been marked by lower agricultural productivity, food shortages, and slower population growth. The absence of maize would have hindered economic development and cultural transformations that occurred as a result of its introduction.
If we consider the introduction of maize (corn) from the Americas to the Old World through the Columbian Exchange, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to, particularly Europe, would have been significantly different if this exchange had not occurred.
Maize played a crucial role in European agriculture and diets after its introduction. Prior to the Columbian Exchange, Europeans relied mainly on grains such as wheat, barley, and oats. Maize, with its high yields and adaptability to various climates, brought about a revolution in European agriculture. Its cultivation spread rapidly, especially in regions where traditional grains struggled to thrive.
Without the introduction of maize, Europe would have faced challenges in sustaining its growing population. The increased agricultural productivity provided by maize enabled European societies to support larger populations and experience demographic shifts. The availability of a reliable and high-yielding crop like maize also had significant economic implications, leading to increased trade and the emergence of a more diversified and prosperous European economy.
Furthermore, the introduction of maize had cultural and culinary impacts. It became a staple food in many European regions and influenced traditional cuisines. Its versatility and nutritional value contributed to dietary diversity and improved the overall health and well-being of European populations.
for more questions on economic
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ8
By A.D. 325, Christianity had spread mostly to what region
Need your help, please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Easy answer
The creation of the printing press was one of the most important creation of all time. With the printing press communication worldwide was made easier since now news and information was able to be created easily in huge amounts and distributed quickly across the globe. Not only did it made communication more possible to achieve but it also played a big role in the literacy rate as the rates began to heavily increase with many learning and now being able to read properly.
list the four major areas of concern in canada foreign policy after ww2
When practicing the historical thinking skill of periodization, historians:
Answer:
Explanation:
When practicing the historical thinking skill of periodization, historians divide history into distinct periods based on significant events, developments, and changes that occurred during those times. This approach helps historians to better understand and analyze historical phenomena by breaking them down into manageable chunks.
Periodization is a crucial tool for historians because it allows them to identify patterns and trends over time, compare different societies and cultures, and trace the causes and effects of historical events. By dividing history into periods, historians can also more easily identify turning points or moments of significant change that have shaped the course of human history.
There are many different ways to periodize history, depending on the specific context and focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include dividing history into political eras (e.g., ancient, medieval, modern), cultural periods (e.g., Renaissance, Enlightenment), economic phases (e.g., agrarian, industrial), or technological revolutions (e.g., Bronze Age, Information Age).
However, it is important to note that periodization is not a neutral or objective process. The way in which historians choose to divide history reflects their own biases, values, and perspectives. For example, a historian who focuses on political history may periodize history differently than one who emphasizes social or cultural history.
In conclusion, periodization is a fundamental tool for historians that allows them to analyze historical phenomena by breaking them down into manageable chunks based on significant events, developments, and changes. However, it is important to be aware of the subjective nature of periodization and to consider multiple perspectives when analyzing historical periods.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names:
1. History.com
2. National Geographic Society
3. The American Historical Association
1. The treaty particularly known for its harsh reparations towards the Germans
after World War I was called
How did the residents of the Louisiana Territory respond to those requirements to become citizens of the US?
Answer:
They didn't, somewhat.
White Louisianans (the French who lived there at the time) were granted immiedate US citizenship.
Explanation:
The Louisiana Purchase created confusing political circumstances within the Territory of Orleans. The treaty granted immediate citizenship to white Louisianans, who were eager to enjoy what they considered the rights of U.S. citizenship.
The outcome of the french wars of religion can best be described as political unity
Answer:
with toleration of Huguenots.
Explanation:
The French Wars of Religion was a period of political turbulence and war between the Catholics and Huguenots (or Protestants). The ruler of France, Catherine de Médicis, consented to show tolerance for Huguenots, which was resented by powerful Catholic families. The war of religion took place between two factions, that is, the House of Bourbon and the House of Guise.
The House of Bourbon supported Protestanism and the House of Guise favoured Catholicism. Both the factions were supported by foreign resources.
The outcome of this prolonged Wars of Religion (1562–1598) came to rest with political unity with toleration of Huguenots. The war ended when the Edict of Nantes was issued which gave Catholicism the place of state religion of France and equal standing of Protestants with Catholics.
Therefore, the correct answer is that war ended with the toleration of Huguenots.
What is the connection between Paul's bringing Christianity to the Gentiles (the non-Jews), the Council of Jerusalem and persecution of Christians until Emperor Constantine's Edict of Milan?
The connection between Paul's mission to bring Christianity to the Gentiles, the Council of Jerusalem, and the persecution of Christians until Emperor Constantine's Edict of Milan lies in the early development and establishment of Christianity as a universal religion.
Paul, also known as the Apostle Paul, played a significant role in spreading Christianity beyond the Jewish community and reaching out to the Gentiles. He embarked on several missionary journeys, preaching and establishing Christian communities among non-Jewish populations throughout the Roman Empire.The Council of Jerusalem, which took place in the first century AD, was a crucial event in early Christian history. The council addressed the question of whether Gentile converts to Christianity should follow Jewish laws and customs. It concluded that Gentile believers did not need to adhere to all Jewish practices, thereby affirming the inclusion of non-Jews into the Christian faith.The spread of Christianity among the Gentiles faced opposition and persecution from various quarters, including both Jewish authorities and Roman authorities. Christians were seen as a threat to established religious and political systems, leading to sporadic persecutions and the martyrdom of many early Christians.The situation changed with Emperor Constantine's Edict of Milan in 313 AD, which granted religious tolerance to Christianity within the Roman Empire. This marked a significant turning point, as Christianity transitioned from a persecuted minority religion to an accepted and eventually dominant faith. Paul's mission to the Gentiles, the Council of Jerusalem's decision on Gentile inclusion, and the subsequent persecution of Christians until the Edict of Milan all shaped the early development and acceptance of Christianity as a universal religion, paving the way for its eventual establishment as the state religion of the Roman Empire.For more questions on Christianity
https://brainly.com/question/11741752
#SPJ8
Why did the Supreme Court declare some new deal laws unconstitutional?
The Supreme Court ruled against Chief Justice Hughes, who cast the majority vote, that the policy enacted in section 9(c) was not unconstitutional, but simply because it was poorly drafted and failed to convey certain powers. Declared that it was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court is the highest court within the judicial hierarchy in most jurisdictions. Other names for such courts are the Court of Last Resort, the Apex Court, and the High Court of Appeal. As a rule, Supreme Court decisions are not subject to review by other courts because they are unconstitutional. For example, when Congress gave the Supreme Court the power to issue writs, it gave the Supreme Court powers Congress could not.
To know more about unconstitutional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14217571
#SPJ1
How does this literature reflect the development of a unique American culture?
A. The themes are centered on patriotic acts in American history
B.The books are all biographies of American leaders.
C.The authors use American history as the setting for the stories.
D.The tales are based on American Indian myths.
Answer: C
Explanation:IK THIS IS RIGHT WE DID THIS IN CLASS TODAY
What was Hitler's answer to the so-called "Jewish Question?"
Answer:
Once in power, the Nazi Party began taking measures to solve the “Jewish Question” in Germany. First, they initiated policies and laws that transformed German Jews into second-class citizens. Then, they expelled Jews from Germany or forced them to emigrate. During World War II, Nazi Germany and its collaborators expanded this goal. They aimed to cleanse all of Europe of Jews through their forced “resettlement” in occupied Poland, the French island of Madagascar, or later occupied Soviet territory.
In 1941, Nazi Germany embarked upon a path of systematic mass murder—the so-called “Final Solution of the Jewish Question.” On January 20, 1942, Reinhard Heydrich, Chief of the Security Police and the SD, held a secret meeting known as the Wannsee Conference. Heydrich informed the representatives of various German governmental agencies that he had been tasked with the preparation of the “Final Solution.” He indicated that it would affect some 11 million Jews then living in Europe. By this stage, almost one million Jews in the occupied Soviet Union had been murdered, most of the Jews in Serbia eliminated, and the first killing center established in Chelmno
HELP PLS SKJDFNAVNAGVDZVJKN
What is the largest source of funding for public education in Texas?
Answer:
Most state funding for public education comes from the state's General Revenue-Related (GRR) funds, including the General Revenue Fund, Available School Fund, State Technology and Instructional Materials Fund and the Foundation School General Revenue Dedicated Account.
Explanation:
this
is what
go
ogle
says
dont mind me
What’s the correct answer answer asap for brainlist
As a global organization for maintaining peace, the League of Nations was founded at the close of World War I. Despite US President Woodrow Wilson's enthusiastic support for the League, isolationists in Congress prevented the US from formally joining the organization.
What is the League of Nations?
The League of Nations was the first global intergovernmental organization whose major goal was to promote peace globally. On January 10, 1920, the Paris Peace Conference, which ended World War One, established it. On April 20, 1946, the prior association ended procedures, although many of its constituent domains were moved into the newly formed United Nations.The Covenant of the League set forth the League's primary goals. They included averting wars using disarmament and collective security, as well as resolving international conflicts through negotiation and arbitration. Other cases it was worried about included working requirements, the equitable remedy of indigenous individuals, drug and human trafficking, the arms trade, world fitness, detainees, and the safety of minorities in Europe.To learn more about the League of Nations, follow the link https://brainly.com/question/14108935
#SPJ13
Mayor Hartsfield coined the phrase "the city is too busy to hate" during his tenure as mayor of Atlanta. What conclusion can you make about Mayor Hartsfield's intended impact on the state of Georgia based on his statement about Atlanta?
A Mayor Hartsfield was busy building Atlanta's first airport and hoped that everyone from the state would use it for air transportation.
B Mayor Hartsfield was a civil rights proponent and hoped that the state would look at Atlanta as an example of racial tolerance during the civil rights movement.
C Mayor Hartsfield knew Atlanta was too busy with other projects to integrate any of Atlanta's schools and hoped that other cities in Georgia would take the initiative in the Civil Rights Movement.
D Mayor Hartsfield didn't think that Atlanta had time to work with civil rights. He was focused on building public parks, expanding the expressway system, and opening Atlanta's first airport, and he wanted the people to come to Atlanta to
work.
Answer:
B Mayor Hartsfield was a civil rights proponent and hoped that the state would look at Atlanta as an example of racial tolerance during the civil rights movement.
Sorry I know its been two weeks since you put this question, hope it helps someone else (:
Explanation:
pls help meeeeee
What is the main difference between command and market economies?
A. In a command economy only, the government owns most of the businesses and means to make money.
B. In a market economy, the government decides the prices to make sure everyone has equal ability to pay for items; in a command economy, all items are provided.
C. A command economy is reflective of government regulation, while a market economy is reflective of what consumers want and need.
D. Competition only hurts the market economy as companies change prices and goods to meet consumer wants.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Question 2 (True/False Worth 2 points)
(LC)Most judges have a degree in law.
True
False
Answer: true because the are fighting for someone that may or may not did a crime
Explanation:
How did the Magna Carta protect the rights of people accused of a crime?
Magna Carta, because of this 'The first-rate charter', is one of the maximum vital documents in records as it established the principle that everybody is difficult to the regulation, even the king, and ensures the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the proper to an honest trial. while became it was signed.
The Magna Carta stated that people could not be punished for crimes until they had been lawfully convicted. The constitution additionally gave the barons the right to claim war on the king if he did now not observe its provisions.
The Magna Carta changed into a document signed through King John in 1215. This document made kings problems with regulation and said that humans could not be deprived of their lives, liberty or belongings unless judged by means of others (law). This document stimulated America's charter by using having an effect on the 10 Amendments.
Learn more about Magna Carta here:
https://brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ9
Question 6 of 10
After American troops captured Saddam Hussein, and he was later tried and
executed, the Bush administration admitted that:
OA. weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq.
OB. Saddam Hussein had been a popular leader who was loved by the
Iraqi citizens.
OC. Saddam Hussein was innocent and had committed no crimes.
OD. almost all arguments used to justify invading Iraq were wrong!
After American troops captured Saddam Hussein, and he was later tried and executed, the Bush administration admitted that Option D. almost all arguments used to justify invading Iraq were wrong!
The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 based on allegations that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and was supporting terrorists. However, after the invasion, no WMDs were discovered, and it became apparent that Saddam Hussein had no links to the 9/11 attacks or terrorist organizations. The justification for the war was undermined, and the Bush administration faced heavy criticism for misleading the public.
The capture and execution of Saddam Hussein did little to alleviate the controversy surrounding the Iraq War. According to the Bush administration, the invasion of Iraq was supposed to remove the threat of WMDs, promote democracy and human rights, and help combat terrorism. However, the lack of WMDs and the subsequent instability in Iraq led to significant consequences for the region. Thousands of Iraqis were killed, and the country was destabilized, allowing for the rise of extremist groups like ISIS.
In conclusion, the admission that the arguments used to justify invading Iraq were wrong highlights the dangers of misinformation and poor decision-making in foreign policy. The Iraq War is a reminder of the need for transparency and accountability in political decision-making. Therefore, the correct option is D.
Know more about American troops here:
https://brainly.com/question/27159377
#SPJ8
against What resulted from the event of 16 June 1976 - the response of the liberation movements, the South African government and the international community? STRUCTURE OF A
The Soweto Uprising, which took place in South Africa on June 16, 1976, saw thousands of black students demonstrate against the educational policies of the apartheid administration. Numerous students lost their lives as a result of the government's brutal crackdowns on the protest.
The international community's response was a broad protest of the apartheid regime and the imposition of various sanctions and embargoes to economically and politically isolate South Africa. As a result of these acts, the South African government came under more pressure to end apartheid and negotiate a peaceful transition to democracy, which ultimately took place in the early 1990s.
Learn more about South Africa here:
https://brainly.com/question/18005052
#SPJ1
Which statement does not characterize Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech?
A.
It openly criticized the governor of Alabama.
B.
It pointed out racial problems in the South but ignored racial injustice in the North.
C.
It supported the peaceful congregation of peoples of all races and religions.
D.
It invoked the power and symbolism of the American dream.
B. The statement that does not characterize MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech is: It ignored racial injustice in the North.
For more such questions on racial, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/15106246
#SPJ8
How did Constantine the great move the capital of the Roman Empire
Constantine the Great moved the capital of the Roman Empire to Byzantium, creating the grand city of Constantinople.
Constantine the Great played a pivotal role in moving the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to a new city he founded, Constantinople (present-day Istanbul, Turkey). In the early 4th century, Constantine recognized the need for a new administrative center that would be strategically located and provide better control over the eastern regions of the empire. He chose the site of Byzantium, an ancient Greek city, as the location for his new capital. Constantine initiated a massive construction project to transform Byzantium into a grand imperial city. He employed skilled architects and engineers to design and build magnificent structures, including the Hippodrome, the Great Palace, and the Hagia Sophia. By relocating the capital, Constantine sought to establish a symbol of his power and create a new center for political, economic, and military activities. This strategic move helped to centralize the empire, strengthen control over the eastern provinces, and provide a foundation for the Byzantine Empire that would flourish for centuries.For more questions on Roman Empire
https://brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ8
Many Christians and Jews converted to Islam in order to
Many Christians and Jews converted to Islam for personal, social and political reasons.
What caused the spread of Islam?The religion emerged in the 7th century among Arab tribes, with monotheistic principles and pillars based on faith and solidarity. The factors that led to the expansion of the religion are due to the period of religious division of the Catholic Church and the expansion of Turkish territory.
Therefore, many Christians and Jews converted to Islam because they identified with the precepts of religion, to escape religious persecution and also for political reasons, such as for example to form new alliances.
Find out more about Islam on:
https://brainly.com/question/4466
#SPJ1
what does slater study when he investigates colonial graveyards?
The title of this long-awaited book by one of New England's most renowned experts on gravestones comes from Harriet Merrifield Forbes' groundbreaking 1927 work Gravestones of Early New England and the Men Who Made Them 1653-1800.
What is the concept of the passage?Dr. Slater has dedicated his book to Mrs. Forbes and Ernest Caulfield, whose groundbreaking research on Connecticut gravestones was published in the Connecticut Historical Society Bulletin in twelve sections between 1951 and 1967.
The Society gave Slater access to Dr. Caulfield's unpublished manuscripts and papers, without which "this task could not have been performed," Slater writes in his introduction.
Thus, The title of this long-awaited book by one of New England's most renowned experts on gravestones.
For more information about concept of the passage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16425419
#SPJ1
A referendum is:
Group of answer choices
a method by which citizens can propose and vote on laws.
a method by which voters can reconsider actions of the legislature.
an election in which voters elect nominees for office.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A Referendum is a method by which citizens can propose and vote on new laws. This is most frequent in democracies, where citizens of a nation can propose new laws that are according to their best interests.