DESCRIBE WHY MANY AMERICANS IN THE NORTH OPPOSED SLAVERY WHILE MOST SOUTHERNERS SUPPORTED SLAVERY... HOW DID THIS DIVIDE LEAD TO CONFLICT....?
Answers
Answer:
This year initiates the commemoration of the Sesquicentennial of the Civil War. This is an occasion for serious reflection on a war that killed some 600,000 of our citizens and left many hundreds of thousands emotionally and physically scarred. Translated into today’s terms – our country is ten times more populous than it was then -- the dead would number some 6 million, with tens of millions more wounded, maimed, and psychologically damaged. The price was indeed catastrophic.
As a Southerner with ancestors who fought for the Confederacy, I have been intrigued with the question of why my ancestors felt compelled to leave the United States and set up their own country. What brought the American experiment to that extreme juncture?
The short answer, of course, is Abraham Lincoln’s election as president of the United States. What concerned Southerners most about Lincoln’s election was his opposition to the expansion of slavery into the territories; Southern politicians were clear about that. If new states could not be slave states, went the argument, then it was only a matter of time before the South’s clout in Congress would fade, abolitionists would be ascendant, and the South’s “peculiar institution” – the right to own human beings as property – would be in peril.
It is easy to understand why slave owners would be concerned about the threat, real or imagined, that Lincoln posed to slavery. But what about those Southerners who did not own slaves? Why would they risk their livelihoods by leaving the United States and pledging allegiance to a new nation grounded in the proposition that all men are not created equal, a nation established to preserve a type of property that they did not own?
In order to find an answer to this question, please travel back with me to the South of 1860. Let’s put ourselves into the skin of Southerners who lived there then. That’s what being an historian is about: putting yourself into the minds of people who lived in another time to understand things from their perspective, from their point of view. Let’s set aside what people said and wrote later, after the dust had settled. Let’s wipe the historic slate clean and visit the South of 150 years ago through the documents that survive from that time. What were Southerners saying to other Southerners about why they had to secede?
There is, of course, a historical backdrop that formed the foundation of experience for Southerners in 1860. More than 4 million enslaved human beings lived in the south, and they touched every aspect of the region’s social, political, and economic life. Slaves did not just work on plantations. In cities such as Charleston, they cleaned the streets, toiled as bricklayers, carpenters, blacksmiths, bakers, and laborers. They worked as dockhands and stevedores, grew and sold produce, purchased goods and carted them back to their masters’ homes where they cooked the meals, cleaned, raised the children, and tended to the daily chores. “Charleston looks more like a Negro country than a country settled by white people,” a visitor remarked.
Fear of a slave rebellion was palpable. The establishment of a black republic in Haiti and the insurrections, threatened and real, of Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner stoked the fires. John Brown’s raid at Harper’s Ferry sent shock waves through the south. Throughout the decades leading up to 1860, slavery was a burning national issue, and political battles raged over the admission of new states as slave or free. Compromises were struck – the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850 – but the controversy could not be laid to rest.
The South felt increasingly beleaguered as the North increased its criticism of slavery. Abolitionist societies sprang up, Northern publications demanded the immediate end of slavery, politicians waxed shrill about the immorality of human bondage, and overseas, the British parliament terminated slavery in the British West Indies. A prominent historian accurately noted that “by the late 1850’s most white Southerners viewed themselves as prisoners in their own country, condemned by what they saw as a hysterical abolition movement.”
As Southerners became increasingly isolated, they reacted by becoming more strident in defending slavery. The institution was not just a necessary evil: it was a positive good, a practical and moral necessity. Controlling the slave population was a matter of concern for all Whites, whether they owned slaves or not. Curfews governed the movement of slaves at night, and vigilante committees patrolled the roads, dispensing summary justice to wayward slaves and whites suspected of harboring abolitionist views. Laws were passed against the dissemination of abolitionist literature, and the South increasingly resembled a police state. A prominent Charleston lawyer described the city’s citizens as living under a “reign of terror.”
Explanation:
Answer:
When Europeans first colonized the North American continent, the land was vast, the work was harsh, and there was a severe shortage of labor. White bond servants, paying their passage across the ocean from Europe through indentured labor, eased but did not solve the problem. Tensions between settlers and former indentured servants increased the pressure to find a new labor source. Early in the seventeenth century, a Dutch ship loaded with African slaves introduced a solution—and yet paradoxically a new problem—to the New World. Slaves proved to be economical on large farms where labor-intensive cash crops, such as tobacco, sugar and rice, could be grown.
By the end of the American Revolution, slavery became largely unprofitable in the North and was slowly dying out. Even in the South the institution was becoming less useful to farmers as tobacco prices fluctuated and began to drop. Due to the decline of the tobacco market in the 1760s and 1770s many farmers switched from producing tobacco to wheat, which required less labor leading to surplus of slaves. However, in 1793 northerner Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin; this device made it possible for textile mills to use the type of cotton most easily grown in the lower South. The invention of the cotton gin brought about a robust internal slave trade. As the lower South became more established in cotton production the region required more slave labor, which they received from upper South slaveowners looking to offload their surplus of slaves. In 1808, the United States banned the international slave trade (the importation of slaves), which only increased the demand for domestically traded slaves. In the upper South the most profitable cash crop was not was not an agricultural product but the sale of human lives. Although some southerners owned no slaves at all, by 1860 the South’s “peculiar institution” was inextricably tied to the region’s economy and society.
Anti-slavery proponents organized the Underground Railroad to help slaves escape north to freedom. Although fictionalized, Harriet Beecher Stowe’s 1852 immensely popular novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin opened northerner’s eyes to some of the horrors of slavery and refuted the southern myth that blacks were happy as slaves. In reality, treatment of slaves ranged from mild and paternalistic to cruel and sadistic. Husbands, wives, and children were frequently sold away from one another and punishment by whipping was not unusual. In 1857 the United States Supreme Court in the decision Dred Scott v. Sandford ruled that all blacks, whether free or enslaved, lacked the rights to citizenship and thus could not sue in federal court. The Supreme Court took their decision a step further by deeming that Congress had in fact exceeded its authority in the earlier Missouri Compromise because it had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories. The Supreme Court also ruled that popular sovereignty, where new territories could vote on entering the union as a free or slave state, lacked constitutional legitimacy. Thus, slaves had no legal means of protesting their treatment. Due to the Dred Scott decision, John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry, and other earlier slave uprisings, Southerners feared servile insurrection above all else but this was rare. Instead as a form of resistance slaves would pretend illness, organize slowdowns, sabotage farm machinery, and sometimes commit arson or murder. Running away for short periods of time was common.The outbreak of the Civil War forever changed the future of the American nation and perhaps most notably the future of Americans held in bondage. The war began as a struggle to preserve the Union, not a struggle to free the slaves but as the war dragged on it became increasingly clear to President Abraham Lincoln the best way to force the seceded states into submission was to undermine their labor supply and economic engine which was sustaining the south—slavery. Many slaves escaped to the North in the early years of the war, and several Union generals established contraband policies in the southern land that they conquered. Congress passed laws permitting the seizure of slaves from rebellious southerners as the rules of war allow for the seizure of property and the United States considered slaves property. On September 22, 1862, following the strategic Union victory at Antietam, President Abraham Lincoln presented the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.
Explanation:
hope this helped =)
Related Questions
Are the police/military ever justified in shooting protesters? Under what circumstances?
Answers
When are the police justified in shooting protestors:
If the protestors turn violent and start shooting ordinary civilians who are simply bystanders, then I believe that shooting those specific protestors is justified though that can quickly delve into messier situationsIf the protestors attack the police and military, I would see a possible justification if the officers' lives are in danger though this is case by case. Sometimes at the moment, it is tough to tell whether you are in danger or not, and everything happens in a split second, so sometimes shooting might not be justified, but that can be controversialWhen are the police not justified in shooting protestors:
If the protestors are peacefully protesting, the police and military should not shoot because they are not a danger to societyIf they are slightly aggressive, the police should move in to warn them and deescalate the situation but shouldn't shoot until necessary.Hope that helps!
Have U.S. leaders learned from the conflict or are they making the same mistakes as before?
Answers
Explanation:
They still make the same mistakes as before it's because they have issues with other countries and they start a war instead of talking it out
8. Babylon became rich from trade because it was located on a major trade route
between the Mediterranean Sea and the
A. Red Sea.
C. Tigris River
B. Euphrates River.
D. Persian Gulf.
Answers
Answer: Persian Gulf
if you had participated in the Gitlow case as a justice of the supreme court would you have agreed with the majority's position or with the justice Holmes dissent?
Answers
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, who dissented, claimed that Gitlow had not transgressed the clear and present danger standard applied in Schenck.
What is dissent?Dissent is an opinion, philosophy, or feeling that is not in accord with or is in opposition to a popular notion or policy that is being implemented by a government, political party, or other body or person. Dissenters are those who hold dissenting opinions. A few antonyms for the word are consent, consensus, and agreement. Dissenting opinions are not legally binding, unlike majority opinions and like concurring opinions, therefore subsequent cases are not required to abide by them. Nonetheless, dissenting opinions preserve minority perspectives on hotly debated legal topics and add to the discussion in public.
To learn more about Dissent click,
https://brainly.com/question/11193672
#SPJ1
Why was the Indian removal act of 1839 passed
Answers
The Indian Removal Act was put in place to give to the Southern states the land that belonged to the Native Americans. The act was passed in 1830, although dialogue had been ongoing since 1802 between Georgia and the federal government concerning the possibility of such an act
Answer:
The Indian Removal Act was enacted to convey land that belonged to Native Americans to the Southern states.
Explanation:
The Indian Removal Act was enacted to convey land that belonged to Native Americans to the Southern states. The act was passed in 1830, after Georgia and the federal government had been discussing the feasibility of such legislation since 1802.
Why slaves were taken????????
Answers
Historians Fred Cooper and Jane Burbank argue that throughout much of human history, empires were successful at maintaining power because of their ability to selectively "accommodate difference" among their subjects. What is meant by that statement?
Answers
Throughout much of human history, empires maintained power by selectively accommodating differences among their subjects.
Throughout history, empires have often sought to maintain their power and control over diverse populations. Historians Fred Cooper and Jane Burbank argue that one way empires achieved this was by selectively accommodating differences among their subjects. This means that instead of imposing a rigid and uniform system of governance, empires recognized and allowed for variations in language, culture, religion, and other aspects of identity within their territories.
By accommodating these differences, empires were able to establish a level of tolerance and inclusivity among their subjects. This approach served several purposes. Firstly, it reduced the likelihood of resistance or rebellion from diverse groups who might otherwise feel marginalized or oppressed. By acknowledging and incorporating the unique characteristics of different communities, empires could mitigate conflicts and foster a sense of belonging among their subjects.
Secondly, by allowing for local customs and traditions, empires could effectively govern their territories without expending excessive resources or manpower. Instead of attempting to impose a homogenous system of administration, which would be met with resistance, empires could rely on local elites or intermediaries who understood the specific needs and dynamics of their communities. This decentralized approach to governance helped to maintain stability and control over vast territories.
Lastly, selectively accommodating differences also played a role in the economic success of empires. By recognizing and utilizing the economic strengths of different regions or groups, empires could harness the resources and skills of their subjects more effectively. This often involved allowing certain communities to retain their distinct economic practices or granting them preferential trading privileges, which in turn contributed to the overall prosperity and wealth of the empire.
In summary, the notion of selectively accommodating differences among subjects refers to the strategy employed by empires to maintain power by recognizing and incorporating the diverse identities, customs, and economic strengths of their populations. This approach promoted stability, reduced resistance, and enabled empires to govern more efficiently.
Learn more about History
brainly.com/question/17092502
#SPJ11
Wells spoke out against problems with black schools. The Memphis school board refused
to hire her back. What made her feel very disappointed?
Answers
Answer:
The fact that she was once there and will no longer me accepted
Explanation:
Roman slaves were used for all of the following EXCEPT Select one: a. work in the mines. b. military service. c. agricultural labor. d. entertainment.
Answers
b. military service. Except for military work, all of the following tasks were performed by Roman slaves. They may labour for a government official, on public construction projects, or in the mines of the emperor.
Forced labour was extremely important to the Roman empire. It was a crucial pillar upon which Rome's strength, riches, and influence were founded. A large number of slaves were forced to work in physical labor-intensive industries including agriculture, mining, and construction. Slavery had a significant impact on both society and the economy in ancient Rome. Roman slaves were engaged in a variety of domestic tasks in addition to manual labour and might hold highly skilled positions. Physicians and accountants frequently worked as slaves. Particularly slaves of Greek descent may have advanced education. The Roman government possessed servi publici, or public slaves.
learn more about Roman slaves here:
https://brainly.com/question/11959280
#SPJ4
When India became independent, what factor determined where people would live in the new states that were created?
Answers
Answer:
Religion
Explanation:
Hindus were settled in India, while Muslims went to Pakistan
What do you see as the critical elements of the Market Revolution? What made this economic growth possible?
Answers
Answer:1.Key Components of the Market Revolution – Transportation, Mechanization, and Commercial Farming. Following the War of 1812, the country looked to expand into the western territories in order to take advantage of the economic opportunities there as new markets opened up.
2.While the finite nature of Earth's resources limits the direction of economic growth, it does not mean that infinite economic growth is impossible.
Explanation:
explain the pattern of colonization in the anericas during the 1700s
Answers
Answer: B is the right answer
Explanation:
thats what im thinking
Please help!! (writing a dialogue)
I could give brainliest:)
Situation:
STUDENTS ARE CITIZENS OF LUZON (CAN BE STUDENTS, DRIVERS, PASSENGERS. TEACHERS OR SIMPLE PERSONS LIVING IN LUZON). AS A CITIZEN APPRECIATING THE RICH LITERATURE OF LUZON WILL BE SHOWN IN THE SITUATIONS TO WRITE THROUGH THE FORMATION OF A DIALOGUE SOME LITERATURE PROUD OF LUZON WHICH IS SLOWLY BEING FORGOTTEN. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT NEED TO BE SHOWED ARE THE POEM, ROLLING, PUZZLE AND THE PRESENTATION ONLY REFLECTS THE LIFE OF THE PEOPLE OF LUZON
Answers
Answer:
Avoid small talk. Oh, this one is music to my introvert ears. ...
Who are 5th and 6th in line to be president?
Answers
Answer:
5th - Secretary of Treasury (currently Janet Yellen)
6th - Secretary of Defense (currently Lloyd Austin)
Explanation:
The Chinese saw the Mongols as barbaric and rude.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
True
False
Answers
The answer is true because they saw the mongols barbaric and rude.
Answer:
The answer is true
Explanation:
I took the test on endg enuity and I got 100
You just read three different stories about
immigrants' experiences.
Even though these immigrants came to America
through two different stations, they had many
things in common.
In two complete sentences, list at least two
examples of qualities that these immigrants
shared.
DONE
I
Answers
In reading three different stories about immigrants' experiences, it becomes evident that despite arriving in America through different stations, these immigrants shared common qualities. Two examples of these shared qualities include resilience and determination.
Resilience: The stories highlighted how these immigrants faced various challenges and hardships but displayed remarkable resilience in navigating their new lives. They exhibited a strong ability to adapt to unfamiliar surroundings, overcome obstacles, and persevere in the face of adversity. Whether it was language barriers, discrimination, or economic hardships, these immigrants showed resilience in their pursuit of a better life for themselves and their families.
Determination: Another shared quality among these immigrants was their unwavering determination to succeed and create a better future. They were driven by a deep sense of ambition and a desire to improve their circumstances. Despite the difficulties they encountered, these immigrants displayed a relentless work ethic, embracing opportunities for education, employment, and entrepreneurship. Their determination propelled them forward, enabling them to overcome challenges and achieve their goals in their new homeland.
These shared qualities of resilience and determination illustrate the common traits that many immigrants bring to their journey of seeking a better life in America. Their stories inspire and remind us of the remarkable strength and determination that individuals possess when faced with new and unfamiliar circumstances.
for more questions on immigrants
https://brainly.com/question/17141328
#SPJ8
Inca Terraced Farming and the Aztec floating gardens are examples of ______
Answers
Inca Terraced Farming and the Aztec floating gardens are examples of innovative agricultural practices employed by ancient civilizations.
Inca Terraced Farming refers to the agricultural system developed by the Inca Empire in the Andean region of South America. Due to the mountainous terrain, the Incas created terraces or stepped platforms on the hillsides to cultivate crops. These terraces utilized a sophisticated irrigation system, including canals and channels, to distribute water evenly across the different levels.
The terraces not only prevented soil erosion but also allowed for the cultivation of a variety of crops at different altitudes, taking advantage of microclimates and maximizing agricultural productivity.
Aztec floating gardens, known as chinampas, were artificial islands constructed on the shallow lakes in the Valley of Mexico. These gardens were created by layering mud, reeds, and aquatic vegetation to form rectangular platforms. The chinampas were anchored to the lakebed by willow trees and were highly fertile.
They were irrigated using a complex system that involved water from the surrounding lakes and canals. The Aztecs grew a wide range of crops, including maize, beans, squash, and flowers, on these floating gardens. The chinampas were not only productive but also sustainable, as they made efficient use of limited land and water resources.
Both Inca Terraced Farming and Aztec floating gardens demonstrate the ingenuity and resourcefulness of these ancient civilizations in developing innovative agricultural methods that allowed them to thrive in challenging environments.
To know more about Inca, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/25818888#
#SPJ11
The debate over dlavery divided the us into 2 sides. The... Emerged as the center of antislavery activity during the abolitionist movement. The abolitionist s objected the slaver for ... Reasons. They believed that it was an unjust practice that stripped humans of their dignity
Answers
True. America was split into two camps due to the dispute over slavery. During the abolitionist movement, the north became into a hub of antislavery action.
Slavery was morally wrong, and abolitionists opposed it. They thought it was a cruel practice that robbed people of their dignity. From the beginning of the colonial era, slavery was practiced in British America; it was fully established by the time the United States Declaration of Independence was signed.
After this, abolitionism, which held that slavery was incompatible with human dignity, gradually gained ground in the North, while the South clung to slavery tenaciously and attempted to extend it into the new western regions as a result of the cotton industry's explosive growth since the 1800s.
Learn more about slavery Visit: brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : The debate over slavery divided the United States into two sides. The (west, north, south) emerged as the center of antislavery activity during the abolitionist movement. The abolitionists objected to slavery for(economic, moral, constitutional) reasons. They believed that it was an unjust practice that stripped humans of their dignity.
which of the following was NOT a result of the British colonization of Australia
A. aborigines died from European diseases.
b. aborigines faced discrimination and harsh treatment
c. aborigines were forced off their land and placed onto reservations.
d. aborigines were able to increase their influence over government laws.
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
logic can be used to determine that the aborigines were forced off their land and discriminated, not increased in power
What were the provisions of the treaty of camp moultrie?
Answers
Answer:
They further promised to keep runaway slaves out of their area. In return, they were to receive livestock, farming equipment, and annuities for twenty years. The Seminoles thought this meant that the treaty was in effect for at least twenty years and that they would be certain that the reservation was theirs for that length of time.
Explanation:
1. shortly after the collapse of military reconstruction in 1876 the constitution of florida of 1885 was developed. the constitution was designed to take power away from the office of the governor. this was done because the governor during reconstruction played a major role in the military occupation. list three things that were in the new constitution which served to limit the power of the governor.
Answers
The new Constitution of Florida of 1885 included several provisions to limit the power of the governor, including: The governor's veto power was curtailed, Governor's term limit and Governor's removal.
The three things that were in the new constitution which served to limit the power of the governor are as follows:
1. The governor's veto power was curtailed - The 1885 constitution of Florida limited the governor's veto power by requiring a two-thirds majority of each house of the state legislature to overturn a veto. This meant that the governor's veto power could be overruled only in rare situations, limiting the governor's power.
2. Governor's term limit - The governor's term was limited to four years, and the governor could not succeed himself or herself for more than two consecutive terms. This served to limit the governor's power because a governor could not be in office for an extended period.
3. Governor's removal - The constitution of Florida of 1885 allowed the governor to be removed from office for "incompetency, malfeasance, corruption, or misconduct in office." The Florida Legislature was responsible for investigating and removing the governor.
This served to limit the governor's power because the governor was accountable to the Florida Legislature and could be removed if they were found guilty of any of the crimes mentioned above.
Therefore, the three things that were in the new constitution which served to limit the power of the governor are 'the governor's veto power was curtailed', 'Governor's term limit' and 'Governor's removal'.
Learn more about Constitution of Florida here:
brainly.com/question/17452390
#SPJ11
What is the purpose behind the mummification for people?
Answers
Answer:
Mummification made sure that bodies did not decompose so they can travel to the afterlife safely.
Explanation:
6th grade
which south african leader possess a power base of expert power
and how were they able to build power and how was that power
abused
Answers
The South African leader who possessed a power base of expert power was Nelson Mandela. He was able to build this power through his extensive knowledge, experience, and expertise in fighting against apartheid and advocating for equal rights.
Mandela's expert power was derived from his understanding of the political, social, and economic dynamics of South Africa.The South African leader who possessed a power base of expert power was Nelson Mandela. He was able to build this power through his extensive knowledge, experience, and expertise in fighting against apartheid and advocating for equal rights.
However, Mandela's power was not abused. Throughout his leadership, he prioritized reconciliation, unity, and non-violence. Mandela actively worked towards dismantling the apartheid system and promoting a peaceful transition to democracy. He focused on building a nation that values equality, justice, and human rights. Mandela's legacy is one of forgiveness, compassion, and inclusive governance.
learn more about South African leader
https://brainly.com/question/32288570
#SPJ11
In 1915, the United States' neutral stance was tested when Germany
O asked Mexico to attack the United States.
O sank the passenger ship Lusitania.
O broke a deal to limit submarine warfare.
signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Russia.
Please help it’s timed
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
RMS Lusitania was the British ocean liner that was sunk on 7 May 1915 by a German U-boat 11 miles off the southern coast of Ireland, killing 1,198 passengers and crew.
It occurred two years before the United States declared of war on Germany.
which of the following factors was not a cause of the scramble for africa? responses end of the slave trade end of the slave trade exploration and politics exploration and politics capitalism and medical advances capitalism and medical advances all of the above were important factors in the scramble for africa.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The factor that was not a cause of the Scramble for Africa was "end of the slave trade." While the end of the slave trade had significant implications for Africa, it did not directly contribute to the Scramble for Africa. The Scramble for Africa refers to the period of intense colonization and annexation of African territories by European powers, primarily occurring between the late 19th century and early 20th century. The main driving forces behind the Scramble for Africa were exploration and politics, as well as capitalism and economic interests. These factors, along with technological advancements and geopolitical rivalries among European powers, fueled the intense competition to acquire African territories. The end of the slave trade, although important in its own right, was a separate historical development that occurred earlier and did not directly trigger the Scramble for Africa.
The factor that was not a cause of the scramble for Africa was: End of the slave trade.
The scramble for Africa refers to the period between 1884 and 1914 when European powers invaded, occupied, and colonized the African continent.
The following factors contributed to the scramble for Africa:
Exploration and politicsCapitalism and medical advancesEnd of the slave tradeAll of the above factors were important causes of the scramble for Africa except the end of the slave trade. The abolition of the slave trade helped to create the need for a new labor source for European powers. Therefore, European powers saw the African continent as a prime target to exploit the resources and labor that would help to fuel their growth and development.
Read more about the scramble for Africa here:
https://brainly.com/question/30108695
#SPJ11
I REALLY NEED ENTRY 3 PLS HELP ASAP
Character: merchant
Directions:
You will be assigned a specific role or person that is traveling West. You will need to visit the websites
and do additional research on your own to gather the necessary information to create 3 quality journal entries.
You will be scored based on the rubric below. The 3 different journal entries will address the following:
Entry 1 - Introduce your assigned individual by telling your reader
who you are, where you come from, and
why you are in the west.
Entry 2 - Describe your experiences living in the west. What is your job? What hardships do you encounter?
Are you poor, wealthy, or somewhere in between?
Entry 3 - Tell the reader of your hopes and dreams for the future. Are you happy that you migrated? What do
you hope to do in the future? What advice would you give to others coming west?
Use creative detailed descriptions that paint a picture in the reader's mind. Use strong word choice
and strang voice in your writing.
Answers
Answer:
you can make up a reason why your in the west, you can tell where you were born, tell the reader your real or fake name,tell them it's your first time being in the west, tell them your in school, tell them what difficulties you have with your friends, tell them either, what you want to be in the future, are you happy you moved?, what would you like to do as a Doctor, maybe, what advice would you warn to them for dangers or just advice life bring water, or something.
Explanation:
I'm only a fourth grader who thinks this is right so i'm very very very sorry if you got it wrong because of me.
True or False: It is affordable for SOME Mexicans to become U.S. Citizens, if they so
wish.
Answers
Describe the effects of globalization in the cartoon
Answers
The effects of globalization shown on the cartoon is increased access to goods from around the world.
What has globalization led to ?Globalization has led to the integration of economies and markets, making it easier for people to buy products and goods from different countries. Advances in transportation, communication, and technology have facilitated the movement of goods across borders, allowing consumers to have a wider variety of products to choose from.
This increased access to goods from around the world has expanded consumer choices and has had a significant impact on global trade and the economy.
Find out more on globalization at https://brainly.com/question/30098582
#SPJ1
What automobile manufacturer was first to implement the assembly line for the mass production of an entire automobile?.
Answers
Answer: Henry Ford
Explanation:
Henry Ford was the first to use the assembly line to manufacture vehicles. It may have been used for other appliance types previous to Henry Ford doing the same for autos, but he was the first to do it for vehicle production.
During the siege of Petersburg, Union troops...
a. were greatly outnumbered by Confederate troops.
b. proved that quick Union victories were possible.
c. greatly outnumbered Confederate troops.
d. abandoned General Grant’s war strategy.
Answers
Answer: C.) greatly outnumbered Confederate troops.
Explanation:
Answer:
(C) greatly outnumbered Confederate troops