your a bus driver and there was 5 people on then 2 got of then 7 got back on what color is the drivers hair
Answer:
ur mother
Explanation:
im so confussed
What was the purpose of the Santa Fe Expedition? and pls dont look it up
Answer:
It was started to establish jurisdiction over the Santa Fe area as well as divert some of the trade coming over the Santa Fe Trail to Texas
14
Case Study: The Kennewick Man
The most contentious case in the history of NAGPRA, and one of the stimuli in moving this legislation forward was the case of the Kennewick Man. In 1996, human skeletal remains were found by canoers along the bank of the Columbia River in Kennewick, WA. Upon further inspection this skeleton, dubbed Kennewick Man, turned out to be 8,400 years old and at the time was one of the most complete skeletons ever found in North America. The primary basis of these results were radiometric tests to determine the age and the inspection of the skeleton by several trained osteologists. Once Kennewick’s age and origins were discovered, scientists immediately recognized the significance of these remains to understanding the peopling of the Americas by over the last 13,000 years.
Almost as soon as Kennewick Man was discovered to be an early American, the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes also recognized that this individual was likely a distant relative and, therefore, could be repatriated (returned) under NAGPRA. The primary basis of their case was oral history of the peopling of this area and long-term residence of contemporary tribes which indicated he was a direct tribal ancestor. The problem? Under NAGPRA "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using burial goods, burial style, and other "archaeological" (read "scientific") markers of culture. Oral history is not considered evidence of cultural affiliation.
Thus was born the ethical and legal dilemma:
Under NAGPRA the remains did not have to be legally returned.
Scientists working on the remains argued the following:
To repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical as Native Americans are not monolithic and contemporary groups’ burial practices aren’t identical to their early ancestors; in other words, Columbia River Basin tribal burial practices are different today than they were 8,000 or more years ago.
From the standpoint of beneficence, these remains belonged to all of humanity not just these descendants. To rebury these remains without studying them could set research on early diseases, ways of life, etc. back centuries.
Tribal leaders working on getting the remains repatriated argued the following:
It would be unethical to keep remains unburied and in a museum given long-term cultural norms about the dead.
From the standpoint of nonmaleficence and autonomy, the tribal leaders noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied (much like Henrietta Lacks in the 1950s) and this individual and the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man’s remains.
Over the decades Kennewick Man went from storage to research lab to storage and finally was placed in permanent storage in 2002. On February 17, 2017, more than twenty years after his remains were found, Kennewick Man’s skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location. While the issue has technically been resolved, the ethical dilemmas from this scenario continue to inform the way researchers think about further research.
Answer:
The case of the Kennewick Man highlights an ethical and legal dilemma that arose under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The Columbia River Basin Indian tribes recognized Kennewick Man as a distant relative and wanted to repatriate the remains under NAGPRA, based on oral history and the belief that he was a direct tribal ancestor. However, under NAGPRA, "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using archaeological markers of culture, such as burial goods and burial style, rather than oral history.
Scientists working on the remains argued that to repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical, as it could set research on early diseases and ways of life back centuries. They also argued that the remains belonged to all of humanity and not just the descendants of the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes. On the other hand, tribal leaders argued that it would be unethical to keep the remains unburied and in a museum, given cultural norms about the dead. They also noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied and that the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man's remains.
Ultimately, after more than 20 years of legal and ethical debates, Kennewick Man's skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location in 2017. This case continues to inform the way researchers think about further research and the ethical implications of studying human remains.
many labor unions formed during the late 19th and early 20th centuries because
Answer:
These labor unions formed because poor working conditions resulted in many premature deaths and injuries.
Explanation:
Answer:
The labor movement in the United States grew out of the need to protect the common interest of workers. For those in the industrial sector, organized labor unions fought for better wages, reasonable hours and safer working conditions.
Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up
What is the role of citizens in a direct democracy?
A. voting on all legislation that becomes law
B. participating in government without representation
C. advising officials on all legislation and policy
D. controlling government bodies and institutions
Answer:
B. participating in government without representation
What would be the cost of the lives be if the
United States planned to invade mainland Japan?
Very bloody because the Japanese were prepared to
lose as many people as it took to protect their
homeland.
A medium amount because the American Army had a
great deal of soldiers that did not know how to swim.
Very Little because the United States had a very well-
trained army.
Answer: The cost of lives if the United States planned to invade mainland Japan during World War II would have been very high. This is because the Japanese were known for their fierce resistance and were prepared to use kamikaze attacks and other tactics to defend their homeland. Additionally, the geography of Japan and the lack of suitable landing sites would have made the invasion very difficult and costly in terms of lives lost. Estimates of casualties for such an invasion ranged from 500,000 to over a million, including both American and Japanese soldiers and civilians.
Explanation:
True or false questions By 1900, each state in the United States had compulsory attendance laws requiring children to attend school for a certain part of the year. a. true b. false 12 Answer: By 1900, college attendance declined as more people took jobs in industry. a. true b. false 13 Answer: The Interstate Commerce Commission was created to regulate the railroads. a. true b. false 14 Answer: The major aim of the progressive movement was to improve conditions for minority groups and women. a. true b. false 15 Answer: President Theodore Roosevelt opposed conservation of natural resources in support of industrial interests. a. true b. false 16 Answer: The split in the Republican party in 1912 helped make it possible for William Howard Taft to be elected President of the United States. a. true b. false 17 Answer: The Seventeenth Amendment provided for the direct election of United States Senators. a. true b. false 18 Answer: The muckrakers pointed out corruption in business and government. a. true b. false 19 Answer: The Federal Reserve System was created to preserve such natural resources as forests and minerals. a. true b. false 20 Answer: The Federal Trade Commission was concerned with correcting unfair business practices. a. true b. false
Answer:
true :>
Explanation:
Can someone help me with this question?
the second one
,like cabot made....
max weber urged sociologists to strive toward the goal of being value-free.T/F
True.
Max Weber, a prominent sociologist, emphasized the importance of value neutrality or value freedom in sociological research. Max Weber advocated for sociologists to pursue the goal of being value-free or value-neutral in their research.
How did Max Weber urge sociologists?Max Weber, a prominent sociologist, emphasized the importance of value neutrality or value freedom in sociological research. He argued that sociologists should strive to separate their personal values and biases from their scientific investigations in order to achieve objectivity and impartiality. Weber believed that by maintaining value-free analysis, sociologists could better understand and interpret social phenomena without allowing their own subjective opinions to influence their work.
Max Weber urged sociologists to strive toward the goal of being value-free or value-neutral in their research to maintain objectivity and impartiality. He argued that by separating personal values and biases, sociologists can better understand and interpret social phenomena without allowing subjective opinions to influence their work. Weber believed that value-free analysis would lead to a more accurate and unbiased understanding of society.
So it is true.
Learn more about:sociologist
brainly.com/question/14424248
#SPJ11
what is an example of the DeChurch & Marks model in
action?
The DeChurch & Marks model is a model used to analyze and optimize the effectiveness of teams. The model is based on four critical dimensions, which are task, structure, process, and context. Below is an example of the DeChurch & Marks model in action.
A company that wants to improve its product development process can use the DeChurch & Marks model. Task: The company identifies the product development process as the task. Structure: The company analyzes the structure of the product development team, including the roles and responsibilities of team members, and how they interact. Process: The company examines the product development process, including the tools and techniques used to develop the product and how the team communicates. Context: The company looks at the external factors that affect the product development process, such as market trends and competition. By using the DeChurch & Marks model, the company can optimize the effectiveness of its product development team by making improvements in the four critical dimensions of task, structure, process, and context.
to know about product development process visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30910271
#SPJ11
-what groups of people were directly involved in the actions of the chinese excution act
The Chinese Exclusion Act directly affected two main groups of people: Chinese immigrants and the United States government.
The Chinese Exclusion Act, enacted in 1882, targeted Chinese immigrants specifically and prohibited their entry into the United States. This act directly impacted Chinese laborers, merchants, and other individuals seeking opportunities in the U.S. It led to the separation of families, prevented Chinese immigrants from reuniting with their loved ones, and created significant social and economic hardships for the Chinese community.
On the other hand, the United States government played a central role in implementing and enforcing the Chinese Exclusion Act. The act was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Chester A. Arthur. The government agencies responsible for enforcing immigration laws, such as the U.S. Customs Service, played a direct role in carrying out the provisions of the act. They conducted inspections, imposed restrictions, and monitored Chinese immigrants to ensure compliance with the law.
In summary, the Chinese Exclusion Act directly impacted Chinese immigrants who sought opportunities in the United States, and it was enforced by various government agencies responsible for immigration control. The act had significant implications for Chinese individuals and families, while the U.S. government played a pivotal role in its implementation.
Learn more about United States here
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
what battle was when the americans attacked, the japanese troops dug tunnels and hid in bombsites. many americans were killed. however, the united states won the battle.
The battle being described happened in the Second World War and was the Battle of Iwo Jima.
What happened in the Battle of Iwo Jima ?The battle occurred from February 19 to March 26, 1945, on the island of Iwo Jima in the Pacific Ocean. It was a significant confrontation between American and Japanese forces.
During the battle, the Japanese troops heavily fortified the island with an extensive network of tunnels, bunkers, and underground fortifications. They utilized the natural volcanic terrain and created an intricate system of defensive positions. This made it extremely challenging for the American forces to dislodge them. Despite the intense resistance, the United States ultimately emerged victorious in the Battle of Iwo Jima.
Find out more on the Battle of Iwo Jima at https://brainly.com/question/1301663
#SPJ1
The role of the grand council is similar to that of which branch of the United States federal government?
Answer:
The executive branch like the president. :))))))
what do counterfeiting an enemy's currency during war and adopting another currency during peacetime have in common?
Counterfeiting an enemy's currency during war and adopting another currency during peacetime have in common is that They illustrate the power of stable price.
What is currency ?Currency in paper or coin form issued by a government and accepted at face priceis called currency.Currencies can be divided into three monetary systems: Paper money, commodity money, representative money, depending on what guarantees the value of the currency.There are 180 currencies recognized as legal tender in United Nations member states, non-member states of the United Nations General Assembly, partially recognized or non-recognised states, and their dependent states.Currency Type means, with respect to a Loan, its nature based on Approved Currencies that are permitted and repayable.Cash is legal tender (currency or coin) that can be used to exchange goods, liabilities, or services. It may also include the value of assets that can be easily converted into cash quickly, as reported by the company.To learn more about currency from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/14372075
#SPJ4
How did colonial people act in the 1800's"?
Answer: They acted like English people. I mean like everyone acts differently. If this is a question on a test or quiz that is just d-u-m-b.
Which description best details a common theme of the Lost Generation writers?
A.
desire for racial integration and equality after World War II
B.
promotion of mainstream values after the devastation of the Dust Bowl
C.
need to express the African American cultural heritage and voice
D.
sense of loss and isolation in a changing US society after World War I
E.
belief that art should be expressed in abstract and not always rational terms
Explanation:
need to express the African American cultural heritage and voice
.
.
.
.
is the correct answer
Question 5 of 10 What caused the number of indentured servants in English colonies to decrease? A. Dutch control of the slave trade B. Changes in colonial slavery laws. c. Improvements in conditions in Europe D. Exposure to new colonial diseases
Answer:
A.Dutch control of the slave trade
39.Which of the following was typical of agreements such as the Fort Laramie Treaty between the United States government andAmerican Indian in the post-Civil War West?a.They frequently led to the formation of a common interest between the United States government and AmericanIndians in controlling the activities of White settlers.b.They generally led to the formation of strong, independent American Indian nations.c.They usually lasted a short time before being broken by settlers’ incursions onto American Indian reservations.d.They led to the abandonment of most reservations as American Indian families sought economic opportunities inurban areas.
The accurate answer is alternative C: They generally lasted a quick time before being damaged via settlers’ incursions onto American Indian reservations.
Agreements which include the Fort Laramie Treaty and other similar treaties between the American government and American Indians in the publish-Civil War West have been often characterized by way of a sample of damaged guarantees and encroachment by settlers onto American Indian reservations. While these treaties aimed to set up boundaries and provide some protections for American Indian tribes, they had been regularly violated as settlers moved onto the reservations in search of land, assets, and economic possibilities.
The United States government's failure to put into effect the terms of those agreements and guard American Indian lands and rights caused conflicts and similar dispossession of Native American tribes. The encroachment through settlers often resulted in the lack of traditional territories, disruption of livelihoods, and cultural upheaval for Native American groups.
It is vital to notice that alternatives A, B, and D are not accurate descriptions of the standard consequences of those agreements. While some commonplace hobbies can also have now and again emerged between the U.S. Government and American Indians in controlling settlers' activities (alternative A), it turned into not the triumphing pattern. The formation of strong, impartial American Indian nations (choice B) turned into not normally the final result of these treaties because the United States authorities sought to exert control and dominance over Native American tribes.
The abandonment of most reservations as American Indian households sought financial possibilities in city regions (choice D) no longer aligns with the historical fact of forced removals and the confinement of Native Americans to reservations.
To know more about Fort Laramie Treaty,
https://brainly.com/question/30635105
#SPJ4
Describe the United States mandatory questionnaires and what it asked the Japanese to pledge.
what is magna charta
Magna Charta is a Latin term that translates to "Great Charter" in English. It is one of the most famous legal documents in history and is often considered to be the cornerstone of modern democracy and human rights.
Magna Charta was first issued by King John of England in 1215. At the time, King John was facing significant opposition from a group of rebellious barons who were dissatisfied with his rule. In an effort to quell the rebellion and maintain his grip on power, King John agreed to a list of demands put forward by the barons.
These demands were written down in Magna Charta and included a range of provisions related to the rights and freedoms of the English people. For example, Magna Charta established the principle that no one, not even the king, is above the law.
Although Magna Charta was not an immediate success - King John soon reneged on many of the promises he had made to the barons - it went on to have a lasting impact on the development of English and Western legal systems. Over the centuries, Magna Charta has been invoked by everyone from the American colonists fighting for independence to civil rights activists in the 20th century.
Today, Magna Charta is widely recognized as one of the foundational documents of democratic government and human rights. It has been called "the greatest constitutional document of all time" by Sir Winston Churchill and "the most important document in the history of democracy" by the American Bar Association.
In summary, Magna Charta is a historic document that was issued by King John of England in 1215 in response to a rebellion by barons. Magna Charta has had a lasting impact on the development of legal systems and is widely considered to be one of the most important documents in the history of democracy and human rights.
Know more about "Magna Charta":-
https://brainly.com/question/549211#
#SPJ11
after which event did the united states and the soviet union emerge as superpowers with respect to the rest of the world? responses the united states civil war the united states civil war the promulgation of the monroe doctrine the promulgation of the monroe doctrine the first world war the first world war the second world war
The United States and the Soviet Union emerged as superpowers with respect to the rest of the world after the Second World War.
The Second World War was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945, involving many of the world's nations, including the United States and the Soviet Union. The United States entered the war in 1941 after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, while the Soviet Union joined the Allies in 1941 after being invaded by Nazi Germany.The war had a significant impact on the global balance of power, as it resulted in the defeat of Germany and Japan, and the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as the dominant superpowers. The two nations were left standing as the strongest economic, political, and military powers in the world, with the ability to influence global affairs and shape the post-war international system.The United States and the Soviet Union then became engaged in the Cold War, a period of intense political and military tension between the two superpowers that lasted until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Learn more about Second world War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30554534
#SPJ11
in the trojan women what was the purpose of the trojan war? who won? how were they successful?
The Trojan War was a legendary conflict fought between the city of Troy and a coalition of Greek states. The purpose of the war was to retrieve Helen, the wife of King Menelaus of Sparta, who was abducted by Paris, prince of Troy. According to Greek mythology, the abduction of Helen sparked the war and it lasted for ten years. The Trojans, led by King Priam, fought against the Greeks, led by King Agamemnon.
The Greeks were successful in their mission because they had the advantage of having powerful warriors such as Achilles, Odysseus, and Ajax, who were renowned for their bravery and strength in battle.
Additionally, the Greeks also had a powerful navy, which allowed them to block the Trojans from receiving reinforcements or supplies from their allies. Furthermore, the Greeks had a powerful ally in the form of the god Zeus, who helped them in their cause.
To read more about trojan war, Visit-https://brainly.com/question/14937430
#SPJ11
Given what you know about Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois, how did W.E.B. Du Bois beliefs for equality differ from Booker T. Washington's beliefs?
Group of answer choices
Washington believed in gradual through education and work. Dubois believed in immediate equality in all areas.
Dubois encouraged peaceful protests, while Washington encouraged loud, sometimes violent methods
Dubois believed in gradual through education and work. Washington believed in immediate equality in all areas.
The impact Charles lindeberg had on American industry was ?
Charles Lindbergh had a significant impact on American industry as he paved the way for the growth and expansion of American aviation leaving an enduring impact on the country's industrial landscape.
What was Charles Lindbergh's impact on American industry?He was renowned as an aviator made a profound impact on American industry. His historic solo transatlantic flight in 1927 aboard the Spirit of St. Louis catapulted him to global fame, transforming aviation into a viable and influential industry.
His achievement fueled public interest in air travel leading to increased investments in aircraft manufacturing, navigation systems and infrastructure. His fame and advocacy for aviation also stimulated research and development in aerospace technology, fostering innovation and driving advancements in the aviation industry.
Read more about Charles lindeberg
brainly.com/question/2347589
#SPJ1
Enlightenment ideas were
leading colonial thinkers.
by many
DONE
Were they adopted ignored of rejected
Answer:
it's adopted
Explanation:
:) that's correct
Answer:
Adopted
Explanation:
in which state was dred scott originally serving dr. emerson as a slave?
Wyoming was the nation where the main state allowed women suffrage.
Ladies' testimonial is the right of ladies to cast a ballot in decisions. Starting toward the beginning of the eighteenth 100 years, certain individuals tried to change casting ballot regulations to permit ladies to cast a ballot. Liberal ideological groups would proceed to give ladies the option to cast a ballot, expanding the quantity of those gatherings' possible electorates.
Many examples happened in ongoing hundreds of years where ladies were specifically given, then deprived of, the option to cast a ballot. The primary spot on the planet to grant and keep up with ladies' testimonials was New Jersey in 1776.
Learn more about Dred scott:
https://brainly.com/question/20086578
#SPJ4
Which explains why the united states went to war with Mexico in 1846?
1.Many Americans accepted the idea to manifest destiny.
2.Many Americans wanted to own Mexican slaves.
3.many Americans hoped to make Mexico a new state.
4.many Americans believed Mexico was about to invade Florida.
Fiddler on the Roof -Viewing Guide
1. In Anatevka what governs clothing?
2. Who is the head of the household?
Per. L
Tradition
The head of the house in the ma
3. Remember the Rabbi's blessing for the Czar: "May God bless and keep the Czar
from us. "Why did he say this?
4. What keeps people stable in Anatevka?
5. Who is Yenta? Does she have an important role in their community?
Yenta is the old lady, and She is the matchmaker:
9. What is the news in the paper?
10. What is Perchick's political affiliation?
11. Why is everyone rushing?
6. How does Tevye view his misfortune of poverty?
7. Who is Tevye talking to?
8. What would be the most important thing Teyve would do with his wealth if he were a rich man? What does
this say about his character?
5125
12. What does Tevye think Lazar Wolf wants?
13. Why does Tevye agree to the union?
14. When everyone was drinking in the tavern, did you notice that Tevye was not sure whether he should dance
with the Russians? Why was that?
15. What does the constable tell Tevye is coming? Why does it have to happen?
16. What does Tevye tell him?
17. What is Perchick arguing for?
18. Why is no one happy with the engagement of Tzeitel and Lazar Wolf?
The answer response is given below.
What is the answers? In Anatevka, tradition governs clothing. Tevye is the head of the household. The Rabbi blessed the Czar with this statement because of the political situation at the time, with Jews being oppressed by the Czar's regime. The blessing was a form of resistance, as the Rabbi wanted to keep the Czar away from the Jewish community. Tradition keeps people stable in Anatevka. Yenta is an old lady and the matchmaker in the community. She has an important role as she helps arrange marriages. Tevye views his poverty as a misfortune but also sees it as a test from God. Tevye is talking to God. If Tevye were a rich man, he would use his wealth to provide for his family and live a comfortable life. This shows his character as being family-oriented and practical. The news in the paper is not specified. Perchick's political affiliation is not specified. Everyone is rushing because there is an event or situation that requires quick action, but the specific event is not specified. Tevye thinks Lazar Wolf wants Tzeitel, his daughter, as a wife. Tevye agrees to the union because it is arranged by Yenta and he wants to provide for his daughter. Tevye was not sure whether he should dance with the Russians because of the cultural differences and tensions between Jews and Russians at the time. The constable tells Tevye that the Jews are being forced to leave Anatevka. This has to happen because of the political situation and the oppression of Jews by the Czar's regime. Tevye tells the constable that they will have to take their traditions with them wherever they go. Perchick is arguing for revolutionary ideas and trying to bring change to the community. No one is happy with the engagement of Tzeitel and Lazar Wolf because of their different social and economic backgrounds and the cultural tensions between Jews and Russians at the time.Learn more about clothing form
https://brainly.com/question/24264007
#SPJ1
the women's rights movement fractured along racial lines because?
The women's rights movement fractured along racial lines primarily due to differing experiences and priorities shaped by the intersecting dynamics of race, gender, and class.
The mainstream women's suffrage movement in the United States was predominantly led by white women who focused primarily on securing voting rights for themselves.Women of color, particularly Black women, faced additional layers of discrimination and oppression stemming from racial inequality.The experiences of women of color, including the harsh realities of racism and segregation, led them to advocate for broader social justice issues beyond suffrage alone. They recognized that the fight for gender equality must also address the systemic racism and racial violence faced by communities of color.The mainstream suffrage movement often marginalized or excluded women of color, reinforcing racial divisions within the broader struggle for women's rights. The emphasis on a single-issue agenda and the prioritization of the concerns of white women created a division and limited the ability to build a united front.The fracturing of the women's rights movement along racial lines highlights the importance of intersectionality in understanding social justice movements. It underscores the need for recognizing and addressing the distinct experiences and challenges faced by different groups of women based on their racial identities, in order to foster a more inclusive and comprehensive movement for gender equality.For more such questions on women's rights movement
https://brainly.com/question/14986743
#SPJ8
How did the french and Indian war influence the relationship between American colonists and their British government?