Answers
One of the cases that can be used as an example of Caribbean case laws used related to being terminated while on maternity leave is The Belize National Teachers Union v. The Public Service Commission and the Attorney General.
In the case of The Belize National Teachers Union v. The Public Service Commission and the Attorney General, the Belize National Teachers Union (BNTU) filed a lawsuit alleging that their members were terminated while they were on maternity leave. The claim was based on the grounds that the termination was in violation of the Employment (Termination and Redundancy) Act and the Constitution of Belize. The court found that the termination of the teachers while on maternity leave was a violation of their constitutional rights and ordered that they be reinstated.Another case that can be used as an example of Caribbean case laws used related to being terminated while on maternity leave is
The Employers’ Consultative Association of Trinidad and Tobago v. Lezama. In this case, the employer terminated the employee's contract while she was on maternity leave. The employee filed a claim for unlawful dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy. The court found that the termination was a violation of the Maternity Protection Act and awarded damages to the employee.In conclusion, these two cases are examples of Caribbean case laws used related to being terminated while on maternity leave.
To know more about maternity visit:
brainly.com/question/31218562
#SPJ11
Related Questions
How is Zootopia directly related to our Unit? Provide 4 examples/scenarios using our terms & concepts.
a)
b)
c)
d)
Answers
Despite the fact that Zootopia is a family-friendly picture, it subtly teaches young children about how societal concerns exist in the real world today. This video addresses issues such as sexism, racism, and political corruption, as well as discussion on how to combat them.
What Characters in Zootopia and their Stereotypes are?
Zootopia's animal kingdom stereotypes establish divisions between usually predatory and prey species, as well as between diverse mammals. Rabbits are regarded as being mainly employed as carrot farmers, whereas foxes are characterized as being untrustworthy and cunning.
In the film Zootopia, Nick Wilde is drowning in stereotypes since he is a fox, which is renowned for being a nasty predator, aggressive, and clever. Although Nick is a cunning, cunning fox, he has a tender side that he never shows. He always covers his emotions because he is meant to be sly and deceitful as a fox.
Learn more about Societal Concerns:
https://brainly.com/question/5105464
#SPJ1
Mike Reed, a partner in Post Co., received the following distribution from Post:
Post's basis Fair market value
Cash $11,000 $11,000
Land 5,000 12,500
Before this distribution, Reed's basis in Post was $25,000. If this distribution were nonliquidating, Reed's recognized gain or loss on the distribution would be
a. $11,000 gain.
b. $ 9,000 loss.
c. $ 1,500 loss.
d. $0.
Answers
Reed's recognized loss on the distribution would be $ 1,500. The correct option for the given question is "option C."
In this scenario, Mike Reed received a distribution from Post Co. consisting of cash and land. To determine the recognized gain or loss on the distribution, we need to compare the fair market value of the assets received to Reed's basis in Post before the distribution. The fair market value of the cash received is equal to the basis, so there is no gain or loss on the cash portion.
However, the fair market value of the land received is $12,500, which exceeds its basis of $5,000. Therefore, there is a recognized gain of $7,500 ($12,500 - $5,000) on the land distribution. As a result, the correct answer is option C, which states a $1,500 loss (since the recognized gain is positive, the answer would be a loss).
You can learn more about market value at
https://brainly.com/question/27993050
#SPJ11
Stevens, a citizen of the state of Oklahoma, was involved in an automobile accident with Jackson, a citizen of the state of Alabama. Stevens is injured and wishes to sue. What is the jurisdiction and why?
Answers
The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.
What is the structure of Congress? What are Congress's enumerated powers?
Answers
the rights to collect taxes, regulate foreign and domestic commerce, coin money, declare war, support an army and navy, and establish lower federal courts.
answers.
The Principles of Research Ethics
See Blackboard (Maxfield's Ch. 3) for
1. Classify each of the following ethical violations into one
of the following ethical principles:
a. Do no harm
b. Ensure privacy
c. Obtain voluntary and informed consent
d. Get permission
e. Avoid sponsorship bias and suppression
f. Prevent misrepresentation
g. Ensure the safety of researchers
Ethical Violation
A criminologist conducts a study on the effectiveness of a new violent
inmate rehabilitation program at the request of the program developer, a
for-profit company. She determines that the program is largely
ineffective. A few weeks later, she reads in the paper that the state prison
authorities have adopted this program because it "has been evaluated by a
competent criminologist and has been found to be effective".
A tribal police department has asked you to evaluate an alcohol
dependency program being offered on a Seminole Indian reservation. You
immediately travel to the reservation and begin interviewing patients, all
alcohol dependent, in the treatment facility. You presume that since the
tribal police department invited you to evaluate the program, you can get
started right away.
Two CUNY graduate students have been assigned to conduct field
observations of adults who 'hang out' on street corners. The research site
is a known New York City high crime area. When one of the students'
expresses concern about their safety, the research director says, "Don't
worry about it. What could possibly happen?"
You have been asked to determine the extent to which NYPD enforces
marijuana laws. You hire five students and ask them to openly smoke
marijuana in various public places. You want to see if the police confront
them.
After conducting a case study of a child who had been the victim of
bullying in high school, you realize that others might be able to determine
the identity of the research subject (the minor). You decide to publish the
results anyway because you have the guardian's permission, and you
doubt that anyone will read your article.
At the request of the 112th precinct police chief, you are conducting
research on the work habits of rookie police officers. You tell the officers
about the nature of the study and the information you are going to collect
in interviews with them. You also suggest that their failure to participate
in the department approved' research project will be reported to the chief.
After analyzing the data from a study, you are conducting on a drug use
prevention program, you find that your results are not as definitive as you
had predicted. You suspect that some of the data may have been coded
wrong, so you change some of the data. This changes the results
dramatically and 'proves' that you were right.
Principle
Answers
The rules of conduct for scientists who perform research are governed by research ethics. Respecting the dignity, rights, and wellbeing of study participants requires adherence to ethical norms.
What core principles of research ethics are there?Research ethics refers to the application of fundamental ethical principles to research activities, such as the design and conduct of research, respect for society and other people, the use of resources and research outputs, scientific misconduct, and the regulation of research.
Any dangers or undesirable outcomes should be outweighed by the research's value. While focusing on the research's potential advantages, researchers should aim to reduce any dangers to participants and themselves. To lessen any danger of harm, it is important to take strong safety precautions.
A for-profit organization that developed the program commissioned a criminologist to investigate the success of a new violent criminal rehabilitation program. She comes to the conclusion that the software is essentially useless. A few weeks later, she discovers in the newspaper that this program has been adopted by the state prison system because it "has been studied by a competent criminologist and has been determined to be effective".- f. Prevent misrepresentationYou have been asked to assess a Native American reservation's alcohol treatment program by the tribal police department. As soon as you arrive at the reservation, you start interrogating the facility's patients, who are all alcoholics. You assume that you may begin right away because the tribal police department invited you to examine the program.- d. Get permissionTwo graduate students have been given the task of observing children who "hang around" on street corners in the field. An location with a history of high crime is the research site. The study director tells a student who worries about their safety, "Don't worry about it. What might possibly occur?- g. Ensure the safety of researchersYou are to determine the level of marijuana law enforcement carried out by the neighborhood police force. Ten college students are hired, and you want them to publicly smoke marijuana in a number of public settings. You're interested in whether the police approach them.- a. Do no harmYou discover that others might be able to identify the research subject after doing a case study of a kid who had been the target of bullying at school (the child). Because you have the guardian's consent and you don't think anyone would read your publication, you decide to publish the results nevertheless.- b. Ensure privacyarticle.
You are looking into the work habits of police personnel at the request of the neighborhood police chief. You explain to the officers the purpose of the study and the data you will gather from them during interviews. Additionally, you say that the chief will be informed of their absence from the "department-approved" study project.- c. Obtain voluntary and informed consentYou discover that your findings are not quite as conclusive as you had anticipated after examining the data from a study you are doing on a drug use prevention program. You alter some of the data because you think that some of it may have been incorrectly coded. This significantly alters the outcomes and "proves" your point.- e. Avoid sponsorship bias and suppressionLearn more about Research ethics: https://brainly.com/question/30409807
#SPJ9
What is Hamlet's tragic flaw in Act 5?
Answers
The tragic flaw of Hamlet is "procrastination." His ongoing awareness and uncertainty prevent him from taking the necessary action. After realising Claudius has been poisoned, Hamlet kills him at last.
His terrible weakness, procrastination, sends him and the other individuals he targets to their deaths.
Despite the fact that tragedies had been written in English before Shakespeare, he is credited for giving them their distinctive elements and elevating them to the highest levels of artistic achievement. Shakespeare's play shows how the fatal fault in the character of the hero operates. Shakespeare's tragedies are primarily tragedies of character, while chance, fate, and the supernatural also play a part in the downfall of the hero. In literature, a character defect known as a "tragic flaw" refers to a personality feature that causes the protagonist to ultimately fail. The phrase "tragic defect" is derived from a Greek idea.
Learn more about Tragic flaw here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547592
#SPJ4
When Lara and Mick cannot resolve their dispute amicably, Lara initiates a lawsuit against Mick. Lara is
Answers
The responsibility for transmitting the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals is
Answers
The transmission of the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals is the responsibility of the circuit clerk. The clerk is also responsible for furnishing the appellant with a docketing statement form.
The circuit clerk is responsible for sending the record and a certified copy of the docket entries to the court of appeals. According to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 11(b), the appellant must furnish the circuit clerk with a docketing statement form. In most cases, the record is forwarded to the appellate court within 10 days of the appeal. However, in some instances, the appellant must provide transcripts of the trial proceedings, which may take time.
The transmission of the record is crucial in that it provides the appellate court with an accurate representation of what transpired during the lower court proceedings. The record usually contains trial transcripts, evidence, exhibits, and pleadings. It is worth noting that the transmission of the record must be done within the stipulated time frame, which is usually 30 days after the notice of appeal is filed. Failure to adhere to this time frame may lead to the dismissal of the appeal.
Learn more about the court from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
What motivated the nations of europe to engage in imperalist activities?
Answers
The economic growth and moral superiority have been regarded as the factors that led to motivate the European nations being engaged in the imperialist activities, especially during the seventeenth century.
The European imperialism is often sought as the effect of the greed for power that the different European nations had. Moreover, it is also to be that many nations became aware of the economic growth and power that it brings along, added to the moral superiority being at the center of focus. This is one of the biggest reasons why European imperialism came to the rise.
Learn more about European imperialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29908236
#SPJ4
When a psychologist simply records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a – study. The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable – the other. This is the – problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a – controlling both of the observed variables.
Answers
Answer:
The Correct approach will be "correlational, causes, directionality and third variable".
Explanation:
Correlational studies are little more than an investigation that is sometimes used throughout psychology as either a preparatory method for gathering information about a particular topic and within circumstances where it would not be sufficient to execute a research project.The method described in the previous section usually includes investigates the relationships between two or even more independent variables.Because then the answer is indeed the correct one.
The correlational studiesis a research where the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical relationship between them.
When psychologist records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a correlational study.The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable causes the other and this is the directionally problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a third variable controlling both of the observed variables.Read more about correlational study
brainly.com/question/4272060
In the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, one stated goal is to "promote the general Welfare." Which of the following phrases has the same meaning as
"general Welfare"?
O Common good
O Legal system
O Rule of law
O Social contract
Answers
Answer: Common Good
Explanation: general welfare refers to what would be consiidered beneficial for all or most, or what comes with being a citizen, which is common good.
assume sally suffers from mental illness. she is declared mentally incompetent as part of a competency hearing. three months later she enters into a contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture. it appears she understood the consequences of her actions. based upon these facts alone, her contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture is\\
Answers
Based upon these facts alone, Sally's contract for the purchase of bedroom furniture is voidable.
What is a voidable contract?A voidable contract is a contract that is enforceable until one of the parties to the contract has the option of voiding it. A voidable contract is one that can be cancelled at the option of one of the parties, while an unenforceable contract is one that cannot be enforced by law.
A voidable contract is enforceable until one of the parties decides to void it.
A contract is voidable if one of the parties is incompetent to enter into the agreement at the time it is made. Sally was declared mentally incompetent as part of a competency hearing, which means she was not legally able to enter into a contract at the time. As a result, the contract is voidable.
Sally may choose to void the contract or ratify it by retaining the goods and continuing with the purchase. Sally's mental illness, on the other hand, does not automatically invalidate the agreement.
To learn more about contract, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219#
#SPJ11
why guns are not a proven deterrent in the context of burglary
Answers
Answer:
The new empirical results reported here provide no support for a net deterrent effect from widespread gun ownership. Rather, our analysis concludes that residential burglary rates tend to increase with community gun prevalence.
Explanation:
have a nice day.
Officer Tom is executing a validly obtained search warrant in Kathryn's home. The warrant gives him the right to search every room in the house but is limited to a search for automatic weapons and handguns. When he walks into the kitchen, he sees an open box filled with small plastic bags containing small pills. A closer inspection reveals that the pills are ecstasy, an illegal narcotic. May Officer Tom seize the drugs even though the warrant did not include a search for drugs. Would the drugs be admissible in court?
Answers
Answer:
Drugs would not be admissible in court.
Explanation:
A warrant is a document that authorizes a bailiff to perform certain actions on behalf of the local court. In short, so that the police of a city can make searches in a house, arrest and confiscate objects, things and people, there must be a specific warrant that authorizes the situation, otherwise the police act against the law and have their activity disregarded. .
In the case shown in the question above, we can see that there was a warrant that made it possible to search all rooms in Kathryn's house, but it is limited to a search for automatic weapons and firearms. In this case, even if the police find illegal substances, he cannot arrest them, as he does not have this authorization. If he arrested the substances, they would be disregarded in court.
With reference to the Contracts Act 1950 or any case law, answer the following questions.
Malani sees a diamond ring on display at Habid Jewel’s shop window, the price tag indicates
RM20,000. Excited that the deal was good, she rushes to the counter only to be told that there
was a mistake on the label and that the actual price of the necklace is RM30,000. Malani
demands that Habid Jewel sells the necklace to her at the price stated on the tag.
Advise whether Habid Jewel is bound to sell the necklace at the price of RM20,000.
Course Title: Malaysian Business Law
Answers
Under the Contracts Act 1950 in Malaysia, the general rule is that an offer made by the dealer is welcome to treat instead of an official offer. The buyer, in turn, makes an offer by demonstrating their willingness to buy the thing at the shown cost. The dealer at that point has the choice to acknowledge or dismiss that offer.
Within the given situation, Habid Jewel made a mistake in labelling the price of the diamond ring, demonstrating RM20,000 rather than the proper cost of RM30,000. When Malani saw the shown cost of RM20,000, she rushed to the counter and requested to buy the jewellery at that cost.
In any case, since the cost tag was a mistake, it does not constitute a substantial offer from Habid Jewel. Hence, Habid Jewel is not bound to offer the accessory to Malani at the cost expressed on the tag. The proper cost of RM30,000 is the real offer from the seller.
If Malani demands on obtaining the jewellery at an inaccurate cost, Habid Jewel has the proper to deny the offer and offer the jewellery at the proper cost or withdraw the thing from the sale altogether.
It is imperative to note that particular circumstances and other relevant components may influence the result in person cases. In this manner, looking for legal advice or alluding to case law in Malaysian business law would give more exact direction in this matter.
know more about Contracts Act
https://brainly.com/question/29621466
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. according to the video, the ______ investigated the automobile accident involving tracy morgan; it will make a determination as to the cause of the accident and whether there was __________.
Answers
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigated the automobile accident involving Tracy Morgan. It will make a determination as to the cause of the accident and whether there was any violation of federal safety regulations or other contributing factors that may have played a role in the accident.
The NTSB is an independent federal agency that investigates transportation accidents and makes recommendations to improve transportation safety. Its investigations are thorough and detailed, often involving interviews with witnesses, analysis of data, and examination of physical evidence. Once the investigation is complete, the NTSB will issue a report that includes findings, conclusions, and recommendations for preventing similar accidents in the future.
Unfortunately, you did not provide the terms to fill in the blanks. However, I can help you understand the structure of the answer. It should look like this: According to the video, the [investigative agency] investigated the automobile accident involving Tracy Morgan; it will make a determination as to the cause of the accident and whether there was [specific issue or violation].
To know more about National visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/10963923
#SPJ11
You should have your fuel tank, fuel lines fuel pump,carburetor and fuel injectior lines checked regularly to prevent _____.
A.fires
B.fuel leaks
C. Exposure to toxic gases
D. All of the above
Answers
which nims command and coordination structures are offsite locations
Answers
One of the four NIMS Command and Coordination structures are emergency operations centers.
EOCs are off-site sites where workers from many agencies get together to: Address immediate threats and dangers. ICS is used to oversee on-scene, tactical-level reaction. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides direction for collaboration among all tiers of government, nongovernmental groups, and the corporate sector in order to avoid, defend against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from incidents. By balancing flexibility and standardization, NIMS provides a framework for interoperability and compatibility. In order to manage domestic incidents, the government and the private sector can collaborate through the flexible framework offered by NIMS. The organizational structure of the State Operational Center (SOC) under NIMS corresponds to the fundamental ICS functions. ICS, on the other hand, is a tactical communications system that is field-based, whereas NIMS offers a framework for controlling the event at the local, operating area, region, and state levels.
Learn more about NIMS here
https://brainly.com/question/11121182
#SPJ4
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
How many amendments in the constitution of the united states.
Answers
Answer:
27
Explanation:
The Magna Carta would put England in the long road to establishing a lawmaking body. What is this lawmaking body or legislature called?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is Parliament
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
With reference to the interpretation of the Constitution,
discuss how the South African context and its own "grand narrative"
can be used as interpretive factors
Answers
In the South African context the interpretation of the Constitution takes into account the country's unique history and grand narrative.
South Africa's history is marked by intolerance, a system of racial isolation and distinction. thus, when interpreting the Constitution, the courts and scholars consider the principles of equivalency, non-discrimination, and requital for historical injustices. The grand narrative of South Africa includes the struggle for freedom, accord, and assembling a society grounded on human rights and social justice.
These factors guide the interpretation of the Constitution, ensuring that it reflects the values and ambitions of the South African people in their quest for a further inclusive and indifferent society.
To learn more about the South Africa Constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/1371761
#SPJ4
how did the defense dismantle the prosecution’s case against oj?
Answers
The OJ Simpson trial was one of the most high-profile criminal trials in American history, and it was closely followed by millions of people around the world.
OJ Simpson was charged with the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, was able to dismantle the prosecution's case in a number of ways. First, they argued that the LAPD had mishandled the evidence and contaminated the crime scene, raising doubts about the reliability of the forensic evidence.
They also argued that the prosecution's star witness, LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, had a history of racism and had planted evidence to frame Simpson. This argument was supported by audio recordings in which Fuhrman used racist language.Furthermore, the defense team was able to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors by presenting alternative theories of the crime.
To know more about criminal click here
brainly.com/question/30428746
#SPJ11
Can the president pardon someone convicted of treason
Answers
Yes, the US President does have the power to pardon a person who has been under the conviction of treason.
The presidential powers have been an exclusive right that can be held only by the person holding the position, as such. Since the national president has substantial powers in many aspects, he or she may also pardon someone by using the power of clemency for someone who has been convicted of treason. However, this power does not extend its scope for criminal offenses. So, it can be said that the president does possess this exclusive power.
Learn more about presidential powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/3962141
#SPJ4
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP AS IN RIGHT NOW!!!! What do we call the leader of the executive branch? *
President
Secretary
Speaker
Vice President
Answers
Answer:
The President of the United States
Explanation:
The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch. The President gets help from the Vice President, department heads (called Cabinet members), and heads of independent agencies.
is it illegal to hang things from your rearview mirror
Answers
It relies on the legal system in place and the particular item being hung. Because it can impair the driver's vision a safety risk, hanging artifacts from rear mirror of a car is prohibited in certain jurisdiction and nations.
How does jurisdiction apply in the UK?In addition to the area over which a court has legal authority, jurisdiction also refers to the right or ability of the court to decide a dispute between parties.
What procedures govern jurisdiction in the UK?the courts in both England and Wales have the power to convict British citizens for offenses committed on UK naval vessels in the "high seas," in "any foreign port or harbor," or "on any foreign vessel."
To know more about jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. code was enacted in 1871 to protect against misconduct on the part of police. What are some examples of how the statue protects a suspect? (Select all that apply.)
Responses
(A) By limiting the amount of physical force an officer can use when arresting someone.
(B) By enabling a suspect to sue an officer for misconduct.
(C) By ensuring that officers must have probable cause to arrest an individual.
(D) By making sure the police can only arrest people with warrant.
Answers
Some examples of how Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. code protects a suspect include enabling them to sue an officer for misconduct (B). The statute does not limit physical force an officer can use, require probable cause for arrest, or mandate police to only arrest people with a warrant. So, option B. is the right choice.
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. code was enacted in 1871 to protect against misconduct on the part of police. It provides individuals with the right to sue government officials, including police officers, for violating their constitutional rights.
Some examples of how the statute protects a suspect include enabling them to sue an officer for misconduct (B). This means that if a police officer violates an individual's constitutional rights, such as using excessive force during an arrest or conducting an unlawful search, the individual can file a lawsuit against the officer.
The statute does not limit the amount of physical force an officer can use when arresting someone (A). However, officers are required to use only reasonable force to effect an arrest and may not use excessive force.
Section 1983 also does not require officers to have probable cause to make an arrest (C). However, officers must have a reasonable suspicion that an individual has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime in order to make an arrest.
Finally, the statute does not mandate that police can only arrest people with a warrant (D). Officers can make an arrest without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe that an individual has committed a crime in their presence or has a warrant out for their arrest.
Overall, Section 1983 is an important tool for protecting individuals from police misconduct and ensuring that law enforcement officials are held accountable for their actions.
The right answer is B .By enabling a suspect to sue an officer for misconduct.
For more such question on Section 1983
https://brainly.com/question/30580335
#SPJ8
On Saturday after the annual dues meeting of the Grange, the treasurer stopped at a food mart for gasoline and some groceries. Being low on cash, he used the collected money to pay his bill and replaced it on Monday when he received his paycheck. Has a crime been committed? If so, describe what the crime is.
Answers
Answer:
yes, this would be theft or embezzlement
Explanation:
Technically yes, this would be theft or embezzlement. This is because he took money that did not belong to him, even though he repaid what he took it is still a crime. An individual given the title of treasurer is responsible for the organization's money. Therefore, they must make sure that the money is secured, accounted for, and only used for organizational needs. Therefore, taking money from the treasury balance without permission is a crime since it does not belong to the treasurer.