Explain one way in which the profits from raw materials affected global economies.

Answer:

Explanation:

The history of Ottoman–Safavid relations (Persian: روابط عثمانی و صفوی) started with the establishment of Safavid dynasty in Persia (Iran) in the early 16th century. The initial Ottoman–Safavid conflict culminated in the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, and was followed by a century of border confrontation. In 1639, Safavid Persia and Ottoman Empire signed the Treaty of Zuhab which recognized Iraq in Ottoman control, and decisively parted the Caucasus in two between the two empires. For most of it, the Zuhab treaty was a consolidation of the Peace of Amasya of about a century earlier.[1]

Persian and Ottoman Empire in 1661

Until the 18th century, the struggle between the Safavid version of Shia Islam and the Ottoman Turkish version of Sunni Islam had continued to remain an important dimension of the combative relationships between the two major empires.[2] In the early 18th century, Persian–Ottoman peace negotiations introduced a new concept of inter-Muslim relations whereby sovereign states could co-exist as autonomous parts of the Islamic world community.[3] Although the further relations were guided by the mutual fear of weakness and distrust, it wasn't until 1847 when Qajar Persia and Ottoman Empire reached a substantial peace Treaty of Erzurum, starting a century of peace,[2] after centuries of rivalry.

Answer:

swords

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Medieval towns were typically small and crowded. They were narrow and could be up to four stories high. Most of the houses were made of wood, and they tended to lean over time. Sometimes two facing houses would lean so much, they touched across the street!

Unitary government is a system of government where authority is centralized in a single source.

The ultimate decision-making authority is vested in the central government. In these systems, the country is divided into sub-units or regions that are administered by the central government. This type of government is mainly used in small states or countries where the population is relatively unified. Unitary systems are often run with little constitutional accountability.

In contrast, federalism is a system of government in which power is shared between the national government and state or provincial governments. Unlike unitary systems, the power of the federal government is limited; only certain subject matters are expressly delegated by the constitution.

This type of government is more common in large countries or states composed of several distinct regions with distinct needs. It allows for greater autonomy of individual sub-units while ensuring an overall unified government. Federalism also enables independent decision-making on regional and local policies, while the national government makes laws for the entire country. In addition, federalism provides greater constitutional accountability, as the governments are jointly answerable to the people.

To know more about Unitary government , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14401781

#SPJ4

Answer:

The most convincing 'internal' factor behind southern defeat was the very institution that prompted secession: slavery. Enslaved people fled to join the Union army, depriving the South of labour and strengthening the North by more than 100,000 soldiers. Even so, slavery was not in itself the cause of defeat.

Explanation:

brainliest please

The marginal cost curve tends to exhibit the same basic shape across different products due to certain economic principles that are commonly observed in production processes.

While specific factors can lead to variations in the curve's exact position and slope, the underlying reasons for its shape are generally consistent. The marginal cost curve depicts the relationship between the quantity of output produced and the corresponding change in total cost incurred when producing an additional unit.

Here are some key reasons for the similarity in shape:

know more about economic here:

https://brainly.com/question/27247297

#SPJ8

The excerpt from the text adds the most valid reasoning to the author's claim that being a liaison is Serra Hoagland’s most important work is the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 is one tool the Forest Service uses to work with tribal governments in shared responsibility for natural resources." (paragraph 8). Option A is a correct.

Liaison officer serves a intermediary between two people.

They liaise between two or more organizations. or people to communicate about a plan and activities.

He liaise between the forest services and government to see an reasonable outcome in the forest protection act.

Therefore,

the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 is one tool the Forest Service uses to work with tribal governments in shared responsibility for natural resources.

Learn more on forest below

https://brainly.com/question/24518939

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer I think, is B. "'Integrating tribes into shared stewardship on the nation's forests and grasslands honors tribal sovereignty and allows us to benefit from millennia of knowledge provided by the first stewards of these lands.'..." (paragraph 9)

Explanation:

Integrating means linking, connecting, as described as "The Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 is one tool the Forest Service uses to work with tribal governments in shared responsibility for natural resources." We're also provided with "Forests are a highly valuable, renewable resource for indigenous people. Tribal forest management programs, however, are often underfunded and understaffed...." so that being a liaison will be connecting those tribes together and shares "millennia of knowledge provided by the first stewards of these lands"

In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx hypothesized that capitalism would fail if workers revolted. Marx believed that the exploitation of workers by capitalists would eventually lead to a class struggle between the bourgeoisie (the capitalists) and the proletariat (the workers).

He argued that this struggle would culminate in a revolution in which the workers would overthrow the capitalists and establish a socialist society. Marx believed that capitalism was inherently unstable because it relied on the exploitation of workers for profit. As the capitalist class became wealthier and more powerful, the working class would become increasingly impoverished and marginalized. Eventually, the workers would be unable to sustain this system and would rise up against their oppressors. Marx's theory of revolution has been highly influential in the development of socialist and communist movements around the world. While many of his specific predictions about the collapse of capitalism have not come to pass, his ideas about the inherent instability of the capitalist system continue to be relevant today.

To know more about Communist Manifesto

https://brainly.com/question/15135900

#SPJ11

Answer:

A thesis statement is your main claim that you are trying to prove. Qualities of a Good Thesis Statement like :

□The assertive language of the Black Lives Matter movement confronts police brutality.

Explanation:

I am sorry if it is less but I can help you this much only.

Answer:

The hammer stands for the industrial working class and the sickle represents the agricultural workers, therefore together they represent the unity of the two groups. ... Since the Russian Revolution, the hammer and sickle have come to represent various communist parties and communist states.

Answer:

The hammer stands for the industrial working class and the sickle represents the agricultural workers, therefore together they represent the unity of the two groups. ... Since the Russian Revolution, the hammer and sickle have come to represent various communist parties and communist states

Explanation:

Answer:

Ferguson, mostly known for the introduction of the “separate but equal” ... Segregated facilities reflected the public will in Louisiana.

Answer:

(1) 1860 South Carolina secedes

(2) 1861 Fort Sumter falls

(3) 1863   Emancipation proclamation issued  

(4) April 9, 1865 Robert E. Lee surrenders

(5) April 14, 1865 Abraham Lincoln assassinated

Explanation:

I think thats it

Answer:

At the age of thirteen, Akbar was sent by his father to Punjab to secure the province against the invasion of Sher Shah Suri. Akbar's military expeditions were very successful and he was proclaimed as the Mughal Crown Prince in 1556.

Answer:The death of his wife is the reason

Explanation:

I suspect that as an experienced cold war warrior he also appreciated that a tactical nuclear submarine that was virtually undetectable would shift the balance too far from the stalemate that was required for world peace.

Answer:

the Chinese or irish

Explanation:

80% of the workers were chinese and "Most of the early workers were Irish immigrants. Railroad work was hard, and management was chaotic, leading to a high attrition rate. The Central Pacific management puzzled over how it could attract and retain a work force up to the enormous task." -pbs.org

Because of the influence of its cultural and political achievements in the fifth and fourth centuries BC on the rest of the then-known European continent.

It is known as the Cradle of Western Civilization and the Birthplace of Democracy, Greeks in exile and West Europeans sympathetic to ancient Greek culture rallied behind Greece. iv Poets and artists praised Greece as the cradle of European civilization and rallied public support for the country's fight against the Muslim Empire. Greece is the cradle of European civilisation, giving birth to nearly every aspect of our culture, from theatre and democracy to the Olympics and philosophy.

To learn more cradle of European civilization  please click on below link

https://brainly.com/question/4712795

#SPJ4

Prior to the start of World War in 1914, Europe had witnessed almost 100 years of peace.

The primary significant global clash of the 20th century was The first Great War, which endured from 1914 to 1918. The major European nations entered a war that killed millions, toppled empires, and devastated the continent after nearly 100 years of relative peace.

Before WWI, significant European powers shaped two coalitions that made a significant European conflict truly plausible. Aside from that, Europe saw rapid economic expansion and the spread of ideologies like nationalism and imperialism.

The latter posed a threat to the stability of multiethnic empires, particularly Russia and Austria-Hungary. The Second Great War or WWI, frequently curtailed as WWI, was perhaps of the deadliest worldwide struggle ever. It was battle between two alliances, the Partners and the Focal Powers.

To know more about World War I,

brainly.com/question/27400269

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Martin Luther King Jr. is generally considered more successful at advancing civil rights than Malcolm X due to several factors:

Strategy: MLK employed a strategy of non-violent resistance, which appealed to a wider audience and garnered more support from the mainstream public and political leaders. Malcolm X, on the other hand, promoted a more militant approach, which often resulted in violent clashes with law enforcement and did not have the same level of broad-based support.

Message: MLK's message of equality and non-discrimination was more inclusive and universal, and resonated with a wider audience. Malcolm X's message, while still advocating for civil rights, was more focused on the needs and concerns of Black Americans and did not always appeal to those outside the Black community.

Collaboration: MLK was successful in forming alliances and working with other civil rights leaders and groups, including labor unions and religious organizations, to push for change. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was more independent and often critical of other civil rights leaders, which limited his ability to build coalitions and gain support.

Timing: MLK's rise to prominence coincided with a period of significant social and political change in the United States, and his efforts to advance civil rights were supported by a growing movement for social justice. Malcolm X emerged during a time of greater political stability and economic prosperity, which made it more difficult to mobilize support for radical change.

In summary, MLK's strategy, message, collaboration, and timing all contributed to his greater success in advancing civil rights compared to Malcolm X. While both leaders made important contributions to the civil rights movement and their legacies continue to inspire people today, MLK's approach was more effective in achieving tangible progress towards racial equality and justice.

Zora Neale Hurston was an American author, folklorist, and anthropologist who was born in 1891 and died in 1960. Hurston was one of the most significant authors of the Harlem Renaissance, a period of cultural and artistic innovation in the United States in the 1920s and 1930s.

Despite the fact that she is now regarded as an essential contributor to the American literary canon, she was one of the most controversial authors of her time.In the 1930s, Hurston was chastised for her efforts to defend Southern black folklore and black language. She was critical of the standardization of the English language and believed that the complexity and vibrancy of Southern black dialect were worth celebrating.Her work and individualism were frequently dismissed by the other intellectuals of the time, who believed that African Americans should represent their race in a particular way.

She was chastised for refusing to take up a political stance in her writings. Hurston was also chastised for her attitude toward black femininity, which she celebrated and often portrayed as self-reliant and bold. Her novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, which was first published in 1937, was especially controversial. Despite this, it is now widely regarded as one of the most essential works of American literature and is taught in high schools and universities throughout the country.

To know more about Zora Neale Hurston visit-

brainly.com/question/29547057

#SPJ11

The proslavery argument group was developed primarily to satisfy the consciences of Southerners.

The proslavery argument refers to the arguments made by people who supported slavery in the United States of America in the pre-Civil War era. These arguments were used to justify the practice of slavery, including the enslavement of Africans and African Americans. They were designed to appeal to a variety of audiences, including both northern and southern whites.

In general, proslavery arguments fall into three main categories: biblical, economic, and scientific. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and many pro-slavery advocates used a combination of these arguments to support their position. The biblical argument was based on the belief that slavery was sanctioned by God in the Bible. The economic argument claimed that slavery was necessary for the prosperity of the Southern economy, while the scientific argument held that Africans and African Americans were inferior to whites in terms of intelligence and morality.

Read more about the proslavery argument group here:

https://brainly.com/question/28119700

#SPJ11

Answer: 1. economic downturns,nazi ideology and lebensruam, the rise of extremism and forging the alliances, the failure of appeasement

2. Germany attacked the submarine with American soldiers on it including merchant ships  

3. unemployment disappeared virtually.

4.The controversial war guilt blamed Germany for ww1 and imposed heavy dept payments on Germany

5. he just needed somebody to blame for his hardships  

Explanation:  

Answer:Floodplain forest is a bottomland, deciduous or deciduous-conifer forest community occupying low-lying areas adjacent to streams and rivers of third order or greater, and subject to periodic over-the-bank flooding and cycles of erosion and deposition.

Explanation:

Answer: Grasslands are, as their name suggests, flat and open areas where grasses are the dominant type of vegetation. Grasslands can be found on every continent except Antarctica.

Statement "In the 1990s, most of the borrowing by the companies who invested in Asian countries had been in local currencies." is False as in the 1990s, most of the borrowing by companies investing in Asian countries was in foreign currencies, primarily in US dollars.

In the 1990s, there was a significant amount of investment in Asian countries by companies from various parts of the world. As a result of this, there was also a substantial amount of borrowing by these companies to finance their investments. However, the question is whether most of this borrowing was done in local currencies or not. In general, it is true that many companies that invested in Asia during the 1990s did borrow in local currencies. This was partly because local currencies often had lower interest rates than the US dollar or other foreign currencies, making borrowing in local currencies cheaper.

However, it is also true that many companies still chose to borrow in foreign currencies, especially in cases where they were more comfortable with the risks associated with those currencies. For example, some companies may have been more familiar with US dollars and preferred to borrow in that currency, even if it was more expensive. Overall, while it is true that many companies did borrow in local currencies during the 1990s, it is difficult to say whether this was the most common approach. It likely varied depending on the individual company and the specific country in which they were investing.

To know more about Asian Countries visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19579109

#SPJ11

Explanation:

There is no record of Nat Turner expressing his feelings about secession, as he lived and died before the American Civil War, which is typically associated with secession. Nat Turner was an enslaved African American who led a rebellion against slaveholders in Virginia in 1831, decades before the Civil War. He was captured, tried, and executed for his role in the rebellion.

It is possible that Nat Turner may have had opinions about secession or the issue of slavery in the United States, but there is no evidence to suggest what those opinions might have been. Additionally, as an enslaved person who lived in a society that denied him basic human rights and freedoms, it is unlikely that he had the opportunity to express his views publicly or engage in political discussions.

Two Union soldiers found a copy of General Robert E. Lee's battle plans for the Confederate army before the Battle of Antietam. The plans were wrapped around three cigars and were discovered by the soldiers in a field.

The soldiers promptly delivered the plans to Union General George B. McClellan, who used the information to help plan his attack on the Confederates. The Union did take advantage of this intelligence and was able to inflict heavy losses on the Confederates during the battle. The Battle of Antietam was a significant turning point in the American Civil War and remains the deadliest one-day battle in American history with over 22,000 casualties.
Before the Battle of Antietam, two Union soldiers found a copy of Confederate General Robert E. Lee's battle plans, known as Special Order 191. This discovery gave the Union a significant advantage, as it revealed crucial information about the Confederate troop movements and intentions. Union General George B. McClellan, however, was criticized for not acting more swiftly and decisively on the information, which could have potentially led to a more decisive Union victory at Antietam. Nonetheless, the Union was able to stop the Confederate invasion and claimed a strategic victory.

For more information on Battle of Antietam visit:

brainly.com/question/30391182

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

issac newton uttered these famous words in 1687

Kyoto treaty was designed to be a legally binding agreement on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for industrialized countries, but developing countries such as China, Brazil, and India were not required to meet emissions reductions under the protocol.

The Kyoto Protocol, adopted in 1997, was an international treaty aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to mitigate global climate change. It was designed to be a legally binding agreement on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for industrialized countries, but developing countries such as China, Brazil, and India were not required to meet emissions reductions under the protocol.

One of the main reasons for exempting these countries was the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" in international climate negotiations.

This principle recognizes that developed countries are historically responsible for the majority of global greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore have a greater responsibility to reduce emissions and provide financial and technological support to developing countries in their efforts to address climate change.

China, Brazil, and India are among the world's largest developing countries, with rapidly growing economies and significant populations.

Their exemption from emissions reductions under the Kyoto Protocol was based on the understanding that their primary responsibility was to address poverty alleviation and economic development in their own countries, and that mandatory emissions reductions would hinder their ability to achieve these goals.

However, it's worth noting that these countries did take voluntary actions to reduce emissions during the Kyoto Protocol period and have since become major players in global efforts to address climate change.

Today, all three countries have committed to ambitious emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement, which succeeded the Kyoto Protocol as the main international agreement on climate change.

To know more about greenhouse gas refer here

https://brainly.com/question/30674591#

#SPJ11