Explain the role of the national government and the conflicts and tensions inherent in that role.

Answer:

In the 1960s, deep cultural changes were altering the role of women in American society. More females than ever were entering the paid workforce, and this increased the dissatisfaction among women regarding huge gender disparities in pay and advancement and s3xual harassment at the workplace

Explanation:

Answer: silent

Explanation: you cannot hear the a sound

Answer:

The colonies in British North America were indeed divided into regions based on geographic proximity and shared characteristics. The three main regions were New England, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies. Here are the colonies that were part of each region, along with a brief description of their economies:

1. New England Colonies:

- Massachusetts Bay Colony (including present-day Massachusetts)

- New Hampshire

- Connecticut

- Rhode Island

The economy of the New England Colonies was primarily based on industries such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and manufacturing. The region had a long coastline and abundant natural resources, which supported the development of maritime activities. Additionally, the New England colonies engaged in subsistence farming, producing crops like corn, beans, and squash, although the rocky soil and short growing season limited agricultural success.

2. Middle Colonies:

- New York

- Pennsylvania

- New Jersey

- Delaware

The Middle Colonies had a diverse and varied economy. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile soil, which supported extensive agriculture. The region grew crops such as wheat, barley, oats, and rye. The Middle Colonies also had a significant trading presence, with their ports serving as hubs for commerce and shipping. Manufacturing and industries such as iron production, textiles, and shipbuilding were also important economic activities in this region.

3. Southern Colonies:

- Virginia

- Maryland

- North Carolina

- South Carolina

- Georgia

The Southern Colonies' economy was predominantly based on agriculture, particularly the cultivation of cash crops. The region had a favorable climate and fertile land, which allowed for the large-scale production of crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. Plantations, worked by enslaved labor, were central to the Southern economy. The Southern Colonies also engaged in some trade, primarily exporting their agricultural products.

It's important to note that these descriptions provide a general overview of each region's economy, and there were variations and nuances within each colony.

The colonies were divided into three main regions: New England, Middle Colonies, and Southern Colonies.

The list of the colonies that were part of each region:

1. New England Colonies:

2. Middle Colonies:

3. Southern Colonies:

The economies of each region varied due to differences in climate, geography, and available resources.

1. New England Colonies:

Economy: The New England colonies had a diverse economy but were primarily centered around trade, fishing, shipbuilding, and maritime activities. They also engaged in subsistence farming and later developed manufacturing industries such as textiles.

2. Middle Colonies:

Economy: The Middle Colonies had a mixed economy, with a focus on agriculture, trade, and commerce. They were known as the "breadbasket" colonies due to their fertile land, which allowed for the cultivation of staple crops like wheat, corn, and oats. They also had thriving industries such as ironworks, lumbering, and manufacturing.

3. Southern Colonies:

Economy: The Southern Colonies had an agrarian economy heavily reliant on cash crops and plantation agriculture. They cultivated crops like tobacco, rice, indigo, and later cotton, using slave labor on large plantations. The export of these cash crops formed the backbone of their economy. They also had some trade and commerce, but agriculture dominated the Southern economy.

Know more about Colonies here:

https://brainly.com/question/32013798

#SPJ8

Changes to laws and punishments for drug crimes that began in the 1980s include "more serious punishments for drug crimes" (Option E)

A drug-related crime involves the possession, production, or distribution of narcotics with the potential for abuse.

Drugs are also associated with crime since drug trafficking and manufacturing are frequently controlled by drug cartels, organized crime, and gangs.

The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was passed by the United States House of Representatives and Senate in order to intensify Federal efforts to foster international drug law enforcement cooperation, improve enforcement of U.S. drug laws, enhance interdiction efforts, and to provide leadership in developing drug abuse deterrence.

Learn more about Drugs:
https://brainly.com/question/26254731
#SPJ1

Answer: an expansion of what constitutes a drug crime and more serious punishments for drug crimes

Explanation: had to put 2 so got it wrong on edge

Individuals may demonstrate their familiarity with their rights and responsibilities as citizens in a number of different ways. One of the ways is to conform to the rules and regulations set out by the government.

Through this method, one may learn to coexist peacefully with others. For this, it is necessary to know what actions are expected of a person in a certain situation.

For instance, police officers contribute to maintaining order, educators assist pupils to grow intellectually, businesspeople facilitate commerce, medical professionals aid in the treatment of illness, and presidents govern and ensure the general populace's safety and well-being.

This is further explained below.

Generally, Citizenship is a connection that exists between a person and a state; in this relationship, the individual owes loyalty to the state, and in return, the individual is entitled to the protection of the state.

In conclusion, There are several methods for people to prove they understand their duty as a citizen. One is by obeying the government's laws and regulations.

So, people may live in harmony. To accomplish so, one must know what to do based on their function. Policemen protect the peace, instructors guide and educate pupils, merchants trade, physicians treat ailments, and presidents govern and care for everyone.

Read more about citizenship

https://brainly.com/question/18099945

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think that it's c

Explanation:

After being introduced to the House or Senate, a bill is allocated to a committee. If the panel approves the measure, it then moves to the floor for discussion and a vote.

The senator or congressman who promotes the measure could introduce it in any body of Congress. A bill is given to a committee when it comes to light, and the members of the committee will study, debate, and alter the measure.

A bill constitutes a law and is carried out by the administration if it gets approved by the President as well as the American House od Representatives, and the U.S. Senate, or if a presidential veto has been overruled.

Learn more about Senate, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15321724

#SPJ1

Answer: Any member can introduce a piece of legislation. Once a bill is signed by the President or his veto is overridden by both houses it becomes a law and is assigned an official number. When the House or the Senate passes a bill it is referred to the other chamber where it usually follows the same route through committee and floor action. This chamber may approve the bill as received, reject it, ignore it, or amend it before passing it. A legislative proposal that if passed by both the House and the Senate and approved by the President becomes law.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Using the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion, see the analysis of the legal case indicated above.

As already given, Additional security officers were engaged to defend the steel mill from thieves and vandals, as previously stated. CBC management was also aware that the security guards possessed weapons, which they were meant to employ for CBC protection.

The primary goal of recruiting more guards was to defend CBC from external threats.

The responsibility for confirming that the hired guards were:

was that of CBC

Both PSP and CBC were entirely negligent in failing to check and regulate the scenario in which a security guard who was not qualified as an armed guard nonetheless carried the pistol.

Unauthorized employees carrying firearms are automatically breaking the law and endangering their own and others' safety.

Also, once CBC discovered that guards were armed with weapons, it was their job to ensure that sufficient training is provided to their personnel and that they are familiar with the entire procedure so that they may prevent any confusion and are not perceived as a thief or a risk to others.

Working in an atmosphere prone to theft and vandalism necessitated more security and armed guards, which was an inherently risky circumstance, especially when uncertified guards were deployed with guns.

However, both parties (PSP and CBC) were negligent.

Learn more about Legal case analysis at:

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ1

The initial hearing for a felony theft case would normally take place in a lower court or a trial court in many nations.

A felony may be a genuine category of wrongdoing that's ordinarily culpable by detainment for more than one year, fines, or both. Felonies are more serious offenses compared to misdemeanors, which are by and large less genuine wrongdoings.

The precise definition of a felony can change depending on the lawful framework and purview, but a few common illustrations of felonies incorporate kill, theft, assault, fire related crime, capturing, sedate trafficking, and certain shapes of extortion. The particular violations classified as felonies and their comparing punishments are decided by statutory laws and directions in each ward.

Learn more about felony here: https://brainly.com/question/20348390

#SPJ1

Answer:

A- jury selection

Explanation:

Answer:

ghhdghdhgh

Explanation:

Answer:

A.

B.

Explanation:

I think it is a and b because they both would help but c would decrease the contribution.

Answer:

It should be D. Superior Court tell if Im wrong

Explanation:

Answer: about 4,000

about 9,000

continue to increase

Explanation:

Answer:

B.) About $4,000

B.) About $9,000

B.) Continue to increase

Explanation:

Edge, 2022.

The most important aspect of the crime control model of criminal justice is the means by which crime is controlled. Thus, option A is correct.

Criminal cases involve theft, murder, physical aggression, death, etc. These cases result in the convicted person receiving sanctions such as a good, incarceration, or the death penalty.

This theory emphasizes having a successful system, also with the primary goal being to reduce and contain criminality in order to keep public peace and security in the population. According to this theory, protecting individual liberty comes second to reducing crime.

Therefore, option A is correct.

Learn more about criminal case, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27415132

#SPJ1

Answer: B.

Explanation:

Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.

Answer:

-Short Title of Act (in italics).

-Year (in italics).

-Jurisdiction abbreviation (in round brackets).

-The first line of each citation is left adjusted. Every subsequent line is indented 5-7 space

To cite federal laws (also commonly referred to as statutes or acts) in APA Style, include the name of the law, “U.S.C.” (short for United States Code), the title and section of the code where the law appears, the year, and optionally the URL.s.

The main foreign policy position opposed to the American policy of defending its foreign interests related to trade and security is known as isolationism.

1. Isolationism: Isolationism is the main foreign policy position that opposes the American policy of defending its foreign interests related to trade and security. It advocates for minimizing America's involvement in international affairs and prioritizes a focus on domestic affairs instead.

2. Definition of Isolationism: Isolationism is a political ideology that emphasizes avoiding alliances, international conflicts, and economic entanglements with other nations. Supporters of isolationism argue that excessive involvement in global affairs can lead to unnecessary conflicts and divert resources from domestic priorities.

3. Historical Context: Isolationism has had significant influence on American foreign policy throughout its history. During the 19th century, America followed a policy of isolationism, avoiding entangling alliances and focusing on westward expansion and economic growth. However, this stance changed with the onset of World War II, when the United States became more internationally engaged.

4. Critics of Isolationism: Critics argue that isolationism can hinder America's ability to protect its global interests, promote democracy, and respond effectively to international crises. They contend that interconnectedness in today's world necessitates active involvement to safeguard national security and economic prosperity.

5. Balance between Engagement and Isolationism: American foreign policy has often sought a delicate balance between engagement and isolationism. Different administrations may adopt varying degrees of international involvement based on the prevailing circumstances and perceived national interests.

In summary, isolationism is the main foreign policy position that opposes America's policy of defending its foreign interests related to trade and security. While isolationism advocates for minimizing international involvement, American foreign policy has historically pursued a balance between engagement and isolationism based on the prevailing circumstances.

For more such questions on foreign policy , click on:

https://brainly.com/question/9909886

#SPJ8

If brought to the attention of authorities, restraint of trade is the kind of crime that the company would most likely be accused of

An employer's risk of a legal conflict with one of its former employees is significantly reduced by a correctly drafted restraint of trade clause. The employee is made aware that until a specific amount of time has passed, they cannot work for a company that is a direct competitor of their former employer.

The enforceability of contractual limitations on the right to conduct business is governed by the common law notion known as restraints of commerce. It is the forerunner of contemporary competition law. An agreement not to trade is void and unenforceable against the promisor because it runs counter to the public policy of promoting trade, unless the restraint of trade is necessary to safeguard the interests of the business buyer.

To learn more about crime, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29308572

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.

Answer: It projects the form of government in the country.

It ensures the fundamental rights to it's citizens.

It directs the states in making legislation.

It lays out the procedures for several functions, administrations, legislation, execution of the government machinery.

It provides for the separation of Powers.

Explanation:

Answer:

I do not agree with the decision of the case. The "separate but equal" was a lie. The blacks were still separate, and not equal at all.  

Resources- DO NOT COPY AND PASTE PLEASE:

Essential Question of the Case:

Is Louisiana's law requiring racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Background

In 1890, Louisiana passed a law called the Separate Car Act. This law said that railroad companies must provide separate but equal train cars for whites and blacks. Blacks had to sit with blacks and whites had to sit with whites. This act of separating people based on race is called segregation. Anyone who broke this law would have to pay a $25 fine or go to jail for 20 days.

Two groups of people wanted to challenge the constitutionality of the Separate Car Act. A group of black citizens who raised money to reverse the law worked together with the East Louisiana Railroad Company, which sought to end the Act mainly because of business and money reasons. They chose a 30-year-old shoemaker named Homer Plessy, a U.S. citizen who was one-eighth black and a Louisiana resident. On June 7, 1892, Plessy purchased a first-class ticket from New Orleans to Covington, Louisiana and sat in the railroad car for "White" passengers. The railroad officials knew Plessy was coming and arrested him for violating the Separate Car Act.

Plessy argued in court that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment banned slavery and the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the government treat people equally. John Howard Ferguson, the judge hearing the case, had stated in a previous court decision that the Separate Car Act was unconstitutional if applied to trains running outside of Louisiana. In this case, however, he declared that the law was constitutional for trains running within the state and found Plessy guilty. Plessy appealed the case to the Louisiana State Supreme Court, which agreed that the Louisiana law was constitutional. Plessy then took his case, Plessy v. Ferguson, to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Constitutional Principles Related to the Case

Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case Study

Plessy v. Ferguson | 1896 | Page Two

Decision & Impact

In a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ferguson.  The majority rejected Plessy’s Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment arguments and instead agreed with the idea of “separate but equal.”  

The majority, in an opinion written by Associate Justice Henry Billings Brown, supported state based racial segregation. The justices based their decision on the idea of “separate but equal;” that separate facilities for blacks and whites did not conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment as long as they were equal. (The phrase, "separate but equal" was not part of the opinion.)

Justice Brown agreed that the 14th amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law. He identified that the purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment as “enforce[ing] the absolute equality of the two races before the law,” but then argued that “it could not have been intended to abolish [end] distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social…equality.”  According to the Court, the Fourteenth Amendment was only concerned with legal equality, the idea that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.    

Separate but equal is based on the idea that the facilities are kept in equal condition. However, this was not generally the case. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision impacted public institutions immediately. For example, education funding was often much less for African American schools, than for white schools. TThe Plessy v. Ferguson decision greatly impacted society. The idea of “separate but equal” led to racial segregation and states began creating “separate but equal” spaces in public places. his decision led to places in society that were separate, but not equal.

The evaluation of the effectiveness of the law reform process in achieving just outcomes in regard to native title in Australia is a complex and nuanced matter.

The law reform process has led to the recognition of native title as a legal right and the establishment of a framework for its recognition.

However, the burden of proof requirements and complexities in the claims process has posed obstacles for Indigenous claimants, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.

Inconsistencies in court decisions and the coexistence of native title with other land tenure rights have also created uncertainty and limitations on the exercise of native title rights.

But there has been an ongoing dialogue and collaboration between Indigenous communities, governments, and stakeholders to address the remaining challenges and work towards achieving just outcomes in regard to native title.

Thus, this native title issue is complex even if major progress has been made yet challenges and criticism remains.

Learn more about the native title here:

https://brainly.com/question/32142550

#SPJ1

Answer:

State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:

Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.

Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.

Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.

Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.

Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.

Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.

It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.

hey, i hope that helped :)

could you pop me as brainliest pls :)

Answer:

Synthetic fibers are usually composed of very smooth filaments. Animal fibers can be identified using the criteria described in Chapter 5, “Hair.” Synthetic fibers are extruded when they are hot; this means that they are forced out of a spinneret, which is a nozzle like a showerhead; and then they are wound or woven.

Answer:

Lobbyist do not care about the voters. (The voter is outside, looking in through the window)

Explanation:

A lobbyist is a person who is employed by and acts for an organized interest group or corporation to try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and legislative branches.

Answer:

How a Bill Becomes a Law

   STEP 1: The Creation of a Bill. Members of the House or Senate draft,    sponsor and introduce bills for consideration by Congress.

   STEP 2: Committee Action.

   STEP 3: Floor Action.

   STEP 4: Vote.

   STEP 5: Conference Committees.

   STEP 6: Presidential Action.

   STEP 7: The Creation of a Law.

Explanation:

GOOGLE

Answer:

STEP 1: The Creation of a Bill. Members of the House or Senate draft,    sponsor and introduce bills for consideration by Congress.

  STEP 2: Committee Action.

  STEP 3: Floor Action.

  STEP 4: Vote.

  STEP 5: Conference Committees.

  STEP 6: Presidential Action.

  STEP 7: The Creation of a Law.

Explanation: