In the years c1000-c1700, through the trial of Ordeal- it was stated that god would decide the innocence or guilt of the accused. Witchcraft suggested the death penalty for the crime and the last one was the King's peace.
What were the way of punishments in the trial by ordeal, witchcraft and king's peace?In the trial of ordeal, an accused went though the ordeal and his punishment or innocence would be decided by the god, and priest would carried them to the church as at that time church was the powerful institution which used to control the action and thoughts of the people.
Accusations of witchcraft was passed by the Elizabeth, through which, it was decided that the death penalty would be given to the accused if harm caused to others.
King's peace was the belief that it was the duty of the king to maintain the law and order properly for the safety of the people.
Learn more about the trial by ordeal here:-
https://brainly.com/question/6530509
#SPJ1
What did Washington do as a president?
A historical argument is a stance or viewpoint that
Answer:
A historical argument provides an explanation as to how or why an event occurred in the past. The argument is presented by a thesis statement which must be specific, must be able to be proven, and must be able to be argued
Why are the limited forms of government considered to be good for the people?
Answer: A limited government is one whose legalized force and power is restricted through delegated and enumerated authorities. Countries with limited governments have fewer laws about what individuals and businesses can and cannot do. In many cases, such as the United States, it is a constitutionally limited government, bound to specific principles and actions by a state or federal constitution.
The opposite of a limited government is an interventionist or authoritarian government.
Explanation:
Why was the original intent of the Articles of Confederation to create a weak national government?
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the United States of America that served as its first constitution.[1] It was approved, after much debate (between July 1776 and November 1777), by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, and sent to the states for ratification. The Articles of Confederation came into force on March 1, 1781, after being ratified by all 13 states. A guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states. The weak central government established by the Articles received only those powers which the former colonies had recognized as belonging to king and parliament.
The document provided clearly written rules for how the states' "league of friendship" would be organized. During the ratification process, the Congress looked to the Articles for guidance as it conducted business, directing the war effort, conducting diplomacy with foreign states, addressing territorial issues and dealing with Native American relations. Little changed politically once the Articles of Confederation went into effect, as ratification did little more than legalize what the Continental Congress had been doing. That body was renamed the Congress of the Confederation; but most Americans continued to call it the Continental Congress, since its organization remained the same.
As the Confederation Congress attempted to govern the continually growing American states, delegates discovered that the limitations placed upon the central government rendered it ineffective at doing so. As the government's weaknesses became apparent, especially after Shays' Rebellion, some prominent political thinkers in the fledgling union began asking for changes to the Articles. Their hope was to create a stronger government. Initially, some states met to deal with their trade and economic problems. However, as more states became interested in meeting to change the Articles, a meeting was set in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787. This became the Constitutional Convention. It was quickly agreed that changes would not work, and instead the entire Articles needed to be replaced.[3] On March 4, 1789, the government under the Articles was replaced with the federal government under the Constitution.[4] The new Constitution provided for a much stronger federal government by establishing a chief executive (the President), courts, and taxing powers.
Explanation:
The original intent of the Articles of Confederation to create a weak national government because the guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states.
What is a government?A government is the political system by which a country or community is administered and regulated. The most of the key words commonly used to describe governments are monarchy, oligarchy, and democracy.
A government is a system of order for a nation, state, or another political unit. A government is responsible for creating and enforcing the rules of a society, defense, foreign affairs, the economy, and public services.
Some of the different types of government include a direct democracy, a representative democracy, socialism, communism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, and an autocracy.
The original intent of the Articles of Confederation to create a weak national government because the guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states.
Learn more about government here:
brainly.com/question/17166802
#SPJ6
What problem is a free trade agreement most likely to cause for an American
business?
OA. Increased taxes
OB. More competition
OC. Higher labor costs
O D. Smaller markets
Answer:
The most likely problem that a free trade agreement can cause for an American business is more competition
Explanation:
Free trade agreements typically lower or eliminate tariffs and other trade barriers, which makes it easier for foreign businesses to sell their products in the United States. This can lead to lower prices for consumers, but it can also put American businesses at a competitive disadvantage.
Here are some of the ways that free trade agreements can lead to more competition for American businesses:
Foreign businesses may be able to produce goods at a lower cost than American businesses. This is because they may have lower labor costs, or they may be able to take advantage of government subsidies.
Foreign businesses may have access to a larger market than American businesses. This is because they may be able to sell their products in multiple countries, while American businesses are limited to the US market.
Foreign businesses may have more experience in exporting their products. This means that they may be better able to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern international trade.
As a result of these factors, American businesses may find it more difficult to compete with foreign businesses. This can lead to lower profits, job losses, and even bankruptcy for some businesses.
However, it is important to note that free trade agreements can also have benefits for American businesses. For example, free trade agreements can lead to increased exports, which can create jobs and boost the economy. Additionally, free trade agreements can help to lower prices for consumers, which can improve the standard of living.
Ultimately, the impact of a free trade agreement on an American business will depend on a number of factors, including the specific terms of the agreement, the industry in which the business operates, and the business's ability to compete with foreign businesses.
What new institutions developed during the colonial era?
please help i will mark brainliest!
Answer:
I would give into the people. I would see what it is that the people want, solve those issues (just what I would do) -----This is for the 1st question
The main purpose of the law of april 6, 1830 was to:
Answer:
Explanation:
The Law of April 6, 1830 was issued because of the Mier y Terán Report to counter concerns that Mexican Texas, part of the border state of Coahuila y Tejas was in danger of being annexed by the United States. ... It also outlawed slavery in Texas.
Why is Taliaferro opposed to secession? Check all that
apply.
O It might lead to property disputes.
O It could be fatal for the people.
O It could lead to war.
O It could ruin the state's economy.
O It might bring about greater taxes.
O It is against the state's best interests.
Answer:
C,D,E,
Explanation:
just did
Answer:
C, D, E, F
Explanation:
I just took it and made a 100%
trust me ...
Which ocean surrounds Antarctica on all sides?
Question 2 options:
Arctic
Pacific
Atlantic
Southern
Answer:
The southern ocean
Explanation:
Internet says so
Answer:
southern
Explanation:
Vanessa song The internet says so
Which statement about the US Mexican War is true? a. Some Texans saw the war as a chance for revenge b. Texan women played an insignificant role in the war c. Texas soldiers never broke the law in war d. The Texas Rangers were not allowed to fight in the war
Answer:
b. Texan women played an insignificant role in the war.
Explanation:
Women played a major role during the US Mexican government. This is because they took on the responsibility of innumerable positions in the terrestrial army for women, whose aim was to supply the country with food from the country. So that men could join the army and the distribution of food was not interrupted in the country, women submitted themselves to work in the soil, in the fields and in the orchards, taking care of the crops and providing food to the whole nation and the army.
what was the greatest scientific question of wallace's time?
The greatest scientific question of Wallace's time was the question of evolution and the origin of species.
Alfred Russel Wallace was a British naturalist and explorer who is best known for his work on natural selection and the theory of evolution. Along with Charles Darwin, Wallace is credited with developing the theory of evolution by natural selection, which explains how species change over time through the process of natural selection.
This question was one of the most important and controversial scientific questions of Wallace's time, as it challenged traditional beliefs about the origins of life and the role of divine intervention in the natural world. Wallace's work on evolution and natural selection contributed greatly to our understanding of the natural world and helped to lay the foundation for modern biology.
To know more about Wallace's time click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14931753#
#SPJ11
Define the Christian concept of the ‘Just War’ theory’
Answer:
Explanation:
The Christian concept of the "Just War" theory is a moral and ethical framework that seeks to provide guidelines for determining when the use of force in war is morally justifiable. It is rooted in the belief that war should be approached with caution and should only be considered as a last resort.
The principles of the Just War theory can be traced back to early Christian thinkers such as St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. While there may be variations in interpretation, the theory generally consists of two broad categories: jus ad bellum (the right to wage war) and jus in bello (the right conduct within war).
Jus ad bellum encompasses the criteria that must be met for a war to be considered morally justifiable:
Just Cause: The war must be fought for a just and legitimate reason, such as self-defense against aggression, protection of innocent lives, or the defense of basic human rights.
Legitimate Authority: The decision to wage war must be made by a legitimate governing authority, such as a recognized government or international body, and not by individuals or groups acting without proper authority.
Right Intention: The intention behind waging war must be to establish a just and lasting peace, rather than pursuing revenge, conquest, or other unjust motives.
Last Resort: All peaceful means of resolving the conflict must have been exhausted before resorting to war. Diplomatic negotiations and other nonviolent methods should be actively pursued.
Proportionality: The overall good achieved by the war must outweigh the harm caused. The use of force should be proportional to the threat and should not result in excessive or indiscriminate violence.
Examine the excerpt from Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865. “With malice (resentment, bad feeling) toward none, with charity for all,…let us strive on (make efforts) to finish the work we are in to bind up the nation’s wounds…to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.” How did the Congressional Republicans disagree with the views expressed in this passage? A) They wanted former Confederate leaders to return to local public office. B) They believed the South should be severely punished for causing the war. C) They thought Southern states should be immediately readmitted to the Union. D) They did not think the freedmen were able to exercise full civil and political rights.
Answer:
Either B or D, but most likely D
Explanation:
To what extent did Japan's geography create disadvantages for its imperialist policy compared to China and Russia
Answer: Japan is isolated and it is harder to reach other countries to try to take over.
Explanation: ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Which statement best summarizes global developments since the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001?
The United States has sent powerful forces to the Middle East to fight terrorism.
Answer: Intergovernmental organizations have increased their preparation for future terrorist attacks.
Explanation: I took the test
Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau on Government
These thinkers valued reason, science, religious tolerance, and what they called “natural rights"—life, liberty, and property. Enlightenment philosophers John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques.
Natural rights check with the rights given to all human beings, simply for the sake of being human. They may be prevalent ethical ideas amongst all cultures and societies and cannot be reversed by way of government laws. For that reason, natural rights are frequently referred to as inalienable rights — rights that cannot be taken away. Those herbal rights examples observed within the U.S. Bill of Rights could be freedoms of religion, speech, meeting, privacy, and equality beneath the regulation. With the aid of the virtue of being born, those rights are unalienable.
Learn more about natural rights here
https://brainly.com/question/1467269
#SPJ1
Descriptive answer please:
Did Americans' desire for freedom and mobility engender the modern automotive industry and 20th century flight programs, or did those industries, with mass production of affordable vehicles and promises of greater speed and efficiency of travel, trigger a shift in American ideas about freedom and mobility?
The modern automotive industry and 20th-century flight programs were fostered by the desire of Americans for freedom and mobility.
According to many scholars and researchers, the American people's urge for freedom and mobility was the driving force behind these industries. Mobility has always been a fundamental component of the American dream. Americans have long aspired to break free of constraints and move around the country freely.
For example, the Wright Brothers were able to invent and test the world's first successful powered aircraft because they sought to free humans from the constraint of gravity and allow them to soar like birds. Similarly, the birth of the modern automotive industry was a result of the American people's desire for independence and mobility. As a result, many car manufacturers, such as Ford, offered affordable automobiles, allowing many Americans to experience freedom and independence.
Read more about the American people's urge for freedom and mobility here:
https://brainly.com/question/31692068
#SPJ11
Sociologists talk about differences between norms and values. What is the difference between the two? Explain and then give 3 examples to support your answer.
Answer:
Norms are “common ways of doing things” — violating norms, at worst, should only render you weird or thoughtless. Values, on the other hand, are more general in their formulation (treating all people with respect) but violating them evokes some level of condemnation.
Explanation:
The difference in norms can be found across cultures, and so we can say that if a certain act is regarded as deviant in one culture, it is not necessary that it is deviant in another culture also. In contrast, laws are almost the same in all the countries of the world, however, the penalty for the crime may differ.
what concerns did britain and france focus on as they divided up the former ottoman territory? what did they ignore?
The concerns that Britain and France focused on when they divided Ottoman territory was strategic interest but ignored the Self-Determination of Local Populations.
How did the British and French go about Ottoman division ?Both Britain and France aimed to secure strategic advantages in the region. They sought to establish control over territories that would provide access to important trade routes, such as the Suez Canal, and ensure influence over key transportation and communication networks.
The aspirations for self-determination and independence of local populations were often disregarded. The desires and aspirations of the people living in the former Ottoman territories were often subordinated to the interests of the colonial powers.
Find out more on Britain and France at https://brainly.com/question/16814680
#SPJ4
what was life like for bertha adler during world war 2
Answer:
In 1944 the germans took control of liege bertha and her sisters were forced out of school. Some catholic friends of the family helped them obtain false papers and rented them a house in a near village.
Explanation:
Expressed powers are those that are___ A.specifically granted in the Constitution. B.held by both the federal government and the states. C.considered the basis for the “necessary and proper” clause. D.inferior compared to powers directly given by Congress.
Answer:
B.held by both the federal government and the states.
Explanation:
I think it's B but if it's wrong don't quote me.
Why were white males so supportive of president Nixon?
Answer:
President Richard Nixon was the 37th U.S. President.
Explanation:
Richard Milhous Nixon was the President of the United States. He served from year 1969 to year 1974. The Congress started an impeachment motion against him on record of violation of his powers and comtempting the Congress.
But the white males of the United States were in favor of Nixon. They protest against the impeachment of Nixon. Nixon was focused on the detente with both the countries of China and Soviet Russia. He also signed the Treaty of Anti-ballistic missile.
True or False: Both William Hartsfield and Ivan Allen, Jr. Worked for a calm and peaceful transition to desegregate Atlanta. *
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that Both William Hartsfield and Ivan Allen, Jr. Worked for a calm and peaceful transition to desegregate Atlanta.
This is evident in the fact William Hartsfield who was a former Mayor of Atlanta was credited the slogan "the city too busy to hate" for his support and efforts during the period of civil rights crusades in the 1950s
Also Ivan Allen, Jr. a former Mayor of Atlanta and successor to William Hartsfield was known for his efforts to ensure Atlanta thrives economically without segregation of African Americans.
List the one reason why Blues music is a significant American Society.
Answer
The blues music resides in the element of African-Americans creating their own aesthetic. Blues music represents the opposing voice that refused to be silenced by oppression and segregation.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Because of slaves
Explanation:
Slaves made this kind of music to get through hard days of work and it really is significant to American society because most black slaves didn't know how to write so they only had to make music with what they feel and how their day went and had to memorize it. They also had to make their own instruments.
You can copy it ;)
There have been several scenarios in history when the president has used a claim known as to refuse handing over information requested by Congress. Executive privilege Diplomatic dispensation Executive advantage Leadership concession
The term "Executive privilege" refers to the President's ability to refuse to disclose information to Congress or the judiciary. It is a claim that is often made on the basis of the separation of powers and the need for confidentiality in certain areas of executive decision-making.
However, there have been situations in which the President has been required to disclose information, even when the claim of executive privilege has been invoked. For example, in United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that President Nixon had to hand over the Watergate tapes despite his claim of executive privilege.The use of diplomatic dispensation is another way in which the President may be able to withhold information from Congress. This refers to the President's authority to conduct foreign affairs without interference from Congress. In some cases, this may include the ability to withhold information that is deemed sensitive or classified. It is worth noting that the use of executive privilege or diplomatic dispensation is not always a straightforward matter. There are often legal and political implications to these claims, and they can be challenged in court or by Congress itself.
Ultimately, the decision to use these claims is a strategic one that requires careful consideration of the potential consequences. While they may offer a temporary advantage to the President, they can also create political backlash and erode public trust in the government. As such, any decision to withhold information from Congress should be made with great care and consideration.
To learn more about Executive privilege refer:
https://brainly.com/question/11422252
#SPJ11
Which one is correct?
Answer: Number 3 because during the Alamo Texas was fighting agains't the Mexicans
Explanation:
How did the early Mayonaise defend himself
Answer: By going up a escalator and saying cya later
Explanation:
Read the passage carefully.
The Master said, “One who governs through virtue may be compared to the polestar [north star], which occupies its place while the host of other stars pay homage [respect] to it.”
–The Analects,
Confucius
Read the excerpt from The Analects. Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence.
1. The main idea of this text is that
______
2. The value represented in this passage is
____
Correct Answer:
1. ✔ people will follow virtuous leaders
2. ✔ moral goodness
.
Answer:
3 and 2
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
thank you
Explanation:
most ________ rocks are devoid of fossils, which hinders correlation of rocks.
Most Precambrian rocks are devoid of fossils, which hinders correlation of rocks.
The Precambrian refers to the earliest part of Earth's history which is set before the current Phanerozoic Eon. The Precambrian is named as it preceded the Cambrian which is the first period of the Phanerozoic Eon. The Precambrian refers to an informal unit of geologic time, which is subdivided into three eons (Hadean, Archean, Proterozoic) of the geologic time scale. It starts from the formation of Earth about 4.6 billion years ago to the start of Cambrian Period, about 538.8 million years ago, when hard-shelled creatures first appeared in abundance. Precambrian rocks are characterized by different layers of sedimentary rock and include metamorphic, igneous, and sedimentary rocks. Most Precambrian rocks are devoid of fossils, which hinders correlation of rocks.
Learn more about Precambrian:
https://brainly.com/question/1698817
#SPJ4