Answers
In a legal context, the word "exception" is frequently used to mean an item, idea, or person that deviates from the norm or is omitted from the general proposition/condition which is laid down.
According to the decision of State of Oregon v. Moravek 297 Or. App. 763, when a defendant invokes an exception in the context of criminal law, "it constitutes an affirmative defence, which the defendant must establish to prevail in the case".
An exception is a statement that something is not included in a contract, law, or deed, such as "Landlord rents to Tenant the first floor, with the exception of the storage room."
To express disagreement with a judge's decision, a lawyer may "take exception" to the decision.
The burden of proof for exceptions rests with the accused, who must establish the facts that qualify the case for any of the common exceptions. The court will assume that none of these circumstances exist. The defence must establish the accused's guilt.
To know more about exceptions click here
https://brainly.com/question/28682308
#SPJ4
The given question in English is:
Explain what it is and what the resource enabled for cases of decisions that resolve issues related to exceptions consists of.
Related Questions
One of a physician’s patients, a well-respected citizen in a small community, saw the doctor with a complaint of blood in his urine (hematuria). The physician asked the patient if he’d had any new sexual partners recently, and the patient admitted that he had. The physician explained to the patient that his urine specimen had been positive for the STI chlamydia. The physician urged the patient to discuss his medical condition with the patient’s wife, who was also the physician’s patient, but the man was reluctant.
Discussion Questions:
If the patient refuses to confide in the wife, what should the physician do?
What are the legal issues in this case? What are the ethical issues?
Answers
Answer:
The physician must:
*report the communicable disease to the appropriate authorities
*Warn the patient that he must do so.*
Hopefully, the patient will speak with his wife
Legal issues: Patient confidentiality: reporting a communicable disease.
Ethics issues: Notifying the wife
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
The physician must: report the communicable disease to the appropriate authorities, Warn the patient that he must do so. Hopefully, the patient will speak with his wife Legal issues: Patient confidentiality: reporting a communicable disease.Ethics issues: Notifying the wife.
What is communicable disease?A communicable disease is one that can spread from one person to another by a variety of channels, including contact with blood or bodily fluids, breathing in an airborne virus, or being bitten by an insect.
Infectious infections that must be reported include HIV, hepatitis A, B, and C, measles, salmonella, measles, and blood-borne illnesses. The most frequent methods of transmission are feces-oral transmission, food transmission, sexual contact, insect bites, contact with contaminated formice, droplets, or skin contact.
Thus, The physician must: report the communicable disease.
For more information about communicable disease, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27330218
#SPJ2
_______ of the constitution required approval from three-fourths (nine) of the states.
Answers
The amendment process of the constitution required approval from three-fourths (nine) of the states.
The Constitution of the United States is a living document that outlines the framework of the government and its relationship with the people. To ensure that it remains relevant and effective, the Constitution provides a process for amending it.
Article V of the Constitution specifies two methods for proposing amendments, either by two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress or by a convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once proposed, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (currently, 38 out of 50 states) to become part of the Constitution.
This requirement for a supermajority of the states ensures that any proposed amendments have widespread support and are not simply the product of a fleeting political whim. As a result, the Constitution has been amended only 27 times since its adoption in 1787.
To know more about amendment process , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19071469#
#SPJ11
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answers
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
What is the meaning of the executive branch?
Answers
Administration of the United States Laws are carried out and enforced by the executive branch. There are other boards, commissions, and committees in addition to the president, vice president, Cabinet, executive departments, and autonomous agencies.
What does the judicial branch mean?One component of the American government is the judicial branch. The court system is the name given to the judicial branch. There are various court levels. The United States' highest court is the Supreme Court. Laws are reviewed by courts.
The legislative branch's purpose is unclear.Lawmaking is done by the legislative branch. Along with other government organizations, it is made up of the Congress. The House of Representatives and the Senate are both constituent parts of Congress. Americans in each state cast ballots to elect representatives and senators to their state legislatures.
To Know more about , vice president,
https://brainly.com/question/18882530
#SPJ4
what is the electronic standard of conduct or procedure
Answers
Which is true of peremptory challenges during jury selection?
Select one:
A. They are unlimited in number.
B. They require a stated reason for dismissal of a prospective juror.
C. They are constitutionally compelled to have a basis in "content" questions.
D. They can be used to excuse jurors for no particular reason.
Answers
Peremptory challenges during jury selection refer to the process of removing a prospective juror without stating any particular reason for the dismissal. The correct answer to the question is D. Peremptory challenges can be used to excuse jurors for no particular reason.
In other words, attorneys have the right to remove jurors from the jury panel without giving any justification. However, peremptory challenges are not unlimited in number. The number of peremptory challenges available to each party varies depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case. Additionally, peremptory challenges are not constitutionally compelled to have a basis in "content" questions. Nevertheless, attorneys must be cautious when using peremptory challenges to avoid any allegations of discriminatory conduct. In summary, peremptory challenges are an important tool for attorneys during jury selection, but they must be used carefully and appropriately to avoid any claims of impropriety or unfairness.
To know more about Dismissal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17061746
#SPJ11
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
child support
child support laws in Washington
Answers
Formal authority is
A. an established organization, especially one providing a public service.
B. the ability to cause others to behave as they might not otherwise choose
to do.
C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
the process and method of making decisions for groups.
Answers
Answer: C. the legal right or power to give orders and enforce rules.
Explanation:
Formal authority is the power that is given to a leader by an organization.
Substantial progress has been made with regard to employment of people of color in policing Does that make a difference in actual policing operations on the street? Explain and provide support for your position
Answers
The employment of people of color in policing makes a massive difference in policing operations on the street.
How does the employment of people of color in policing make a difference?
Increasing the diversity of law enforcement agencies' workforce enhances policing the street. Cultural diversity training has not been sufficient.
Studies have proved and experiences have shown that diversity in the law enforcement workforce makes the following positive contributions:
Enriches learning experiences of police officers Helps with critical thinking and problem-solvingEngenders individual trust in policingIncreases positive public perceptionThe workforce feels valuedDiverse law enforcement is more efficient and productive.
For instance, had a black police officer been involved in George Floyd's case, what happened could have been averted because the communication flow would not be prejudiced and biased.
Thus, the employment of people of color in policing makes a massive difference in policing operations on the street.
Learn more about diversity in law enforcement at https://brainly.com/question/11252923
#SPJ1
The combination of alcohol with other drugs can produce a _________ effect and alter or increase the effect of alcohol alone.
Answers
Answer:
Bioplagical
Explanation:
Bioplagical creates negative effects
For Biden’s and Obama’s inauguration
Answers
Answer:
The marketers acted differently for each ceremony because for each ceremony they talked about something different. Some elements stayed the same because it could have been the same thing they were talking about like about a meaning or something
Explanation:
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answers
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Mini Problem 2
Wayne and Wanda are filing MFJ with a 4-year-old dependent child. Wayne worked full time and earned $25,000. Wanda became a full-time student for the fall term (Aug thru Dec) and they have no other income. Their principal place of abode was in the U.S. for the entire tax year. Their federal taxable income was $2,300 and their federal tax liability before any credits is $231. While Wanda was a student, they paid $3,000 for childcare.
What is the amount of line 6 from their Form 2441?
Select one:
a. $0
b. $231
c. $375
d. $625
e. None of these
Answers
The amount on line 6 of their form 2441 is $3000. The most that can be deducted for eligible child and dependent care costs is $3000.
What is full-time job?
A full-time job is one where employees work a set minimum amount of hours that have been established by their employer.
Benefits, such yearly leave, sick leave, and health insurance, that are frequently not provided to part-time, temporary, or flexible workers are regularly included with full-time employment. Some people make the mistake of believing that part-time jobs are not careers.
However, there is legislation in place to prevent employers from treating part-time employees unfairly, so this shouldn't come into play when deciding whether to further your career. They often pay more per hour than part-time positions, and if the pay decision is made primarily based on part-time status, this is also discriminatory. Full-time employment and part-time employment are not defined in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
To learn more on full-time job from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12368389
#SPJ1
Which term refers to the process by which property becomes...
Which term refers to the process by which property becomes transferable, and a taxpayer no longer has a substantial risk of forfeiting, or losing the property?
A cash exercise.
A cashless exercise.
Granting privileges.
Vesting.
Answers
The term that refers to the process by which property becomes transferable, and a taxpayer no longer has a substantial risk of forfeiting or losing the property is "Vesting."
Vesting typically applies to employee benefits, such as stock options or retirement plans, where an individual gains ownership or control over the assets or property.
It signifies that the individual has fulfilled certain requirements or conditions, such as completing a certain period of employment or meeting specific performance targets, and now has the right to exercise control over the property without the risk of losing it.
The other options mentioned in your question have different meanings:
A cash exercise refers to the use of cash to exercise stock options or purchase shares at the exercise price.A cashless exercise involves the use of existing shares or other financial arrangements to exercise stock options without the need for cash.Granting privileges generally refers to the act of providing certain rights or benefits to an individual or entity.Therefore, out of the options provided, "Vesting" is the term that specifically relates to the process of property becoming transferable without the risk of forfeiture.
To learn more about Vesting, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31492690
#SPJ11
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answers
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
True or false. To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and sign ig.
Answers
To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False
When something needs to be notarized, what does it mean?A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.
What is a certificate from a notary?A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.
What is a notarized stamp?When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.
Learn more about notarizing document :
brainly.com/question/14477099
#SPJ1
List five reasons why laws exist in the area of construction.
Your answer should not be more than 10 sentences.
Answers
Construction laws or Laws existing in the area of construction consist of safety laws, standard laws, liability, environment and quality laws.
Safety: Laws are in place to ensure the safety of workers and the general public. For example, construction sites are required to have proper signage, protective gear, and safety measures to prevent accidents.Standards: Laws set standards for construction materials and methods to ensure that buildings and structures are constructed safely and are up to code.Liability: Laws exist to hold parties responsible for any accidents or damages that occur during construction projects.Environment: Laws regulate construction practices to ensure that they are environmentally friendly. For example, construction sites must dispose of waste and hazardous materials properly.Quality: Laws ensure that construction projects are completed to a certain level of quality. Building codes specify minimum standards for things like insulation, electrical systems, and plumbing, among other things.Laws exist in the area of construction to ensure that construction projects are safe, environmentally friendly, and of a certain quality. They also serve to hold parties responsible for any accidents or damages that occur during construction projects.
To know more about Construction laws, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32145069#
#SPJ11
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
Answers
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
I keep trying to sign up,but it keeps saying "I'm sorry but we cant sign you up right now" i think they wrote that? I don't know but they wrote something like that
Answers
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
proposes that the War on Drugs began as an attempt to fight two enemies:
Answers
Answer:
The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people.
EXPLANATION:
Ehrlichman told journalist Dan Baum in 1994. "You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities."
The accusation was shocking, characterizing the war on drugs as a racist, politically motivated crusade.
But Ehrlichman's claim is likely an oversimplification, according to historians who have studied the period and Nixon's drug policies in particular. There's no doubt Nixon was racist, and historians told me that race could have (played one role in Nixon's drug war. But there are also signs that Nixon wasn't solely motivated by politics or race: For one, he personally despised drugs — to the point that it's not surprising he would want to rid the world of them. And there's evidence that Ehrlichman felt bitter and betrayed by Nixon after he spent time in prison over the Watergate scandal, so he may have lied.
More importantly, Nixon's drug policies did not focus on the kind of criminalization that Ehrlichman described. Instead, Nixon's drug war was largely a public health crusade — one that would be reshaped into the modern, punitive drug war we know today by later administrations, particularly President Ronald Reagan.
None of that means that the drug war hasn't disproportionately hurt black Americans. It clearly has. But the lessons of Nixon's drug policies may not be so much that he was a racist, power-hungry politician — although, again, he was — but rather that even well-meaning policies can have big, terrible unintended consequences.
Hope it helps! And please give me brainliest pleasse?
search and seizure laws and self incrimination laws originate
from the 2nd amendment to the constitution
true or false
Answers
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Search and seizure laws and self-incrimination laws do not originate from the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. These legal principles are derived from other provisions within the Constitution and its amendments.
Search and seizure laws primarily stem from the Fourth Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by the government. The Fourth Amendment establishes requirements for obtaining search warrants, probable cause, and reasonable expectations of privacy.
Self-incrimination laws find their roots in the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against themselves in a criminal case. This protection ensures that individuals have the right to remain silent and avoid self-incrimination during legal proceedings.
The Second Amendment, on the other hand, pertains to the right to bear arms and the regulation of militias. It does not directly relate to search and seizure laws or self-incrimination laws.
Do you think the media or public judged OJ Simpson before the jury did?
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
When people hear something they like to instantly believe that thing and start hating them.
at a party, a man poisons the food of his neighbor. the man wants revenge for the hideous color his neighbor painted his house. the neighbor gets very sick and needs to go to the hospital. the sick neighbor can sue the man who poisoned his food for which of the following?
Answers
The sick neighbor can sue the man who poisoned his food for the battery.
What is meant by Sue?to pursue legal action against a person or organization, particularly to pursue monetary compensation for harm suffered: He threatened legal action against the letter's allegations because he was so furious about them; initiate a civil lawsuit against: to sue another person for damages.
"continue, persevere," from Anglo-French suer "follow after, continue," from Old French suir, sivre "pursue, follow after, sue in court" (Modern French suivre), from Vulgar Latin *sequere "follow," from Latin sequi "follow" A sarcastic expression implying that a person who disagrees with the speaker's actions or opinions can take legal action against the speaker. quotations.
The majority of the time, it is because someone has not treated you fairly. You might have been hurt physically or financially by them. It's possible that they failed to deliver on their promises. It's possible that they are refusing to pay you a debt.
To know more about Legal Action, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13138525
#SPJ4
A local unemployment office was discovered to have systematically underpaid recipients based on whether they had criminal records.or drug related hospital visits. What kind of law was broken?
Answers
The law that was broken in this scenario is likely the Equal Pay Act or anti-discrimination laws. Discrimination based on criminal history or drug-related hospital visits is prohibited by federal and state anti-discrimination laws.
These laws protect individuals from discrimination in the workplace, including in employment decisions such as hiring, firing, promotions, and compensation. The Equal Pay Act specifically prohibits discrimination in pay based on factors such as sex, race, national origin, and other protected characteristics.
If a local unemployment office was found to systematically underpay recipients based on their criminal history or drug-related hospital visits, it is likely that the office has violated these anti-discrimination laws. This kind of discrimination can have serious consequences for those affected, including lower wages, fewer job opportunities, and a greater risk of poverty and economic insecurity. It is important for individuals and organizations to be aware of and follow these laws to ensure fairness and equality in the workplace.
To know more about Equal Pay Act visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30626514
#SPJ11
Answer:
administrative law
Explanation:
ABS does not provide safety benefits on the road with snow or rain true or false
Answers
Explanation:
As it turns out, ABS actually increases stopping distances on snowy surfaces, as well as those covered in other loose materials, such as gravel or sand. Without ABS, locked tires dig into the snow and form a wedge in front of the tire by pushing it forward
Is a coup d’ etat considered force majeure? Discuss its legal implications to the hotel industry which might be used as headquarters in case of military takeover.
Answers
The Brazilian Revolt of 1930: A military coup d'état that overthrew President Washington coup d'etat and installed the Brazilian military junta of 1930 followed an armed revolution.
The crime of coup d'etat is a sudden the assault accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy, or stealth, directed the against duly elected government officials in the Philippines military, as well as any military camp or installation, communications network, public utilities, or other facilities required for the exercise. "A sudden attempt by a small group of people to the take control of the government, the typically via violence," is what a coup d'état is.
To learn more about military, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28357806
#SPJ1
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Answers
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply.)
Common law evolves in part based on decisions in court cases.
Common law means that only written laws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
✅Common law refers to the fact that judges can only look at written law to make a decision.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.
one with check mark is right
Answers
The following assertions regarding common law are untrue; common law evolves in part as a result of decisions made in court proceedings.
Common law is a corpus of unwritten rules that are founded on judicially established precedents. When there are no written principles of law or applicable statutes, common law is used to guide decision-making in exceptional situations. The British tradition that colonial North America adopted in the 17th and 18th centuries gave rise to the American common-law system. In addition to the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, and New Zealand also use common law.
A precedent, also referred to as stare decisis, is a body of prior judicial rulings that serve as the standard of comparison for current cases. There is no formal legal system that can be applied to a case at hand, therefore common law, also known as case law, relies on thorough records of previous instances and statutes.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ9