*EXTRA POINTS* who convinced george washington to run for president and what did he say?

The 27th Amendment is an addition to the United States Constitution that addresses changes in the salaries of members of Congress. In simple words, the 27th Amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms of office for representatives.

This means that any salary changes for members of Congress cannot take effect until after an election, preventing them from giving themselves immediate raises.

It is important to note that the 27th Amendment does not prevent members of Congress from changing their salaries, but it does ensure that any changes will not take effect until the next term.

To know more about  27th Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/2218350

#SPJ11

I might need a article provided for that.

The Democratic Party and progressive woke faction believe the US Constitution should be a living document, while the Republican Party in general believes it should be a fixed instrument.

The U.S. Constitution has been a fundamental governing document for over two centuries. The document's longevity has led to a heated political and cultural debate about its permanence in recent years. Democrats, particularly the progressive "woke" faction, believe it should be a living, breathing document. On the other hand, conservatives, including the Republican party in general, believe it should be a fixed instrument, not subject to change.

A living document refers to a governing document that can change and adapt to the times. According to Democrats and progressive woke faction, the US Constitution should be seen as a living document. In essence, a living document is an adaptable text that can change in response to new social, political, and technological circumstances.

In other words, they believe that the US Constitution should not be seen as a set of rules written in stone but rather as an evolving document that can be altered to meet the changing needs of society.In conclusion, the political and cultural debate regarding the permanence of the U.S. Constitution revolves around whether it should be a living breathing document or a fixed instrument not subject to change.

To know more about Republican visit :

brainly.com/question/1204107

#SPJ11

B because I know this is not right sorry

Holy Roman Empire is one of the the following countries appear to have had religious homogeneity enforced by the government most frequently.

Therefore correct answer is A.

What can you say about government in a nutshell?

A government is an organization tasked with establishing and upholding a society's laws as well as governing interactions with other civilizations. A ruling body must be as such by the people it claims to represent in order to be regarded as a government.

Who is the government?

According to administrative law, a government is a collection of persons who have the authority to control a region. This area may be a nation, a state or province inside a nation, or a region.

To know more about Government visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer: Holy Roman Empire

Explanation:

Answer:

you haven't provided any options

Baldassare Castiglione suggests that men should avoid ostentation and self-praise because it is seen as unbecoming and goes against the ideals of the courtier, which emphasize humility, modesty, and the ability to showcase one's virtues without boasting.

In "The Courtier," Castiglione argues that a courtier should possess certain qualities and behaviors that make him admirable in the eyes of others.

One of these qualities is humility, which is diametrically opposed to ostentation and self-praise. Ostentation, or showiness, is viewed as an excessive display of wealth, status, or achievements, which can be seen as boastful and arrogant.

Castiglione believed that the courtier should be modest and refrain from praising himself excessively. Instead, he should focus on showcasing his virtues and abilities through his actions, demeanor, and interactions with others.

The courtier should allow others to recognize and appreciate his qualities without explicitly boasting about them.

By discouraging ostentation and self-praise, Castiglione promotes a more balanced and refined approach to self-presentation. It aligns with the ideals of the courtier, who is expected to possess grace, elegance, and humility.

This emphasis on modesty and understated excellence is seen as more virtuous and appealing in the courtly setting.

Learn more about demeanor here:

https://brainly.com/question/32033860

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Explanation:

everything was being taxed and the colonist were not happy, so they wanted to rebel and show parliament what they thought about their stupid taxes on all goods.

Answer:

six years

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer to this question can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

In the given some of the choice is missing, that's why its correct solution can be defined as follows:

The Grendel is a fictitious, monstrous beast, Beowulf  killed in the Old English poem Beowulf.  he  is a guy-eating devil who resides every night in  Spear-Danes, and threatens the mead hall of King Hrothgar, Heorot.  

When the Grendel died his mother targeted Heorot  with a vengeance after he had been assassinated.  She almost kills him before he finds an old sword which tries to kill her and assassinates the dead Grendel.

The Sun god, Aton, was honored by Egyptians in accordance with their religious beliefs.

What are Egyptians?

Egyptians are an ethnic group which is indigenous to the Nile Valley in Egypt. The geography o Egypt and Egyptian identity are intimately related.

Under this ancient Egyptian religion, Aton, also written Aten, was a sun deity who was briefly worshiped as the official religion.

Sun was represented as the solar disk sending rays that ended in human hands. With the shocking revelation that Aton would be the only god, the pharaoh Akhenaton (reigned 1353–36 BCE) reclaimed control of the sun god.

Hence Akhenaton established the city of Akhenaton (El-Amarna) as the center for the Aton's worship in order to distance himself from the dominant cult of Amon-Re at Thebes.

To know more about Egyptians refer:

https://brainly.com/question/27926504

#SPJ1

The correct answer is - Competition to develop strong economies and build large empires.

There were lots of tensions in Europe about the shares that each colonial country had on the other continents were the natural resources were abundant. While some considered that they had won this territories fair and square, others were on the opinion that they should get some of the colonies under their control. The background of this was of course the economy, and the competition between the nations to be wealthier, military stronger, and enlarge their territories. Unfortunately, these tensions led to a World War.

On 2 August 1990, the people of Kuwait City awoke at 5am to the sound of Iraqi tanks rolling down their streets. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein intended to annex the small Sheikhdom of Kuwait, Iraq’s “19th province,” and tap its massive oil reserves. The invasion did not come entirely out of nowhere. Iraqi troops were massed at the border as the result of an oil dispute with its tiny neighbor, and the United States tried to persuade Iraq to solve its problems with Kuwait peacefully. This action was the first time one sovereign state had invaded and annexed another since Indonesia annexed East Timor in 1975; and it was the first major challenge to world order since the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall. This chapter examines key events in US foreign policy in the Middle East from Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iraq in 1990 to Donald Trump’s announcement of US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018. It shows how America’s strong position at the end of the Cold War and the end of Operation Desert Storm in 1991 led to a period of American hyper-involvement in Middle Eastern politics that ultimately weakened its regional standing.

The global reaction to Saddam Hussein’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait was virtually universally negative. The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) issued Resolution 660, demanding that “Iraq withdraw immediately and unconditionally all its forces to the positions in which they were located on 1 August 1990.” Saddam Hussein’s blatant act of aggression and territorial aggrandizement put an end to decades of stalemate in the Security Council when the USSR and the US voted together on UNSCR 660.

It was not immediately obvious how the United States would react to Saddam’s aggression; and it was by no means certain that the US had any interest in fighting a war to restore Kuwait’s sovereignty. Congress was divided. The Senate approved the use of force against Iraq by a vote of just 52–47, significantly closer than the 77–23 approval of the 2003 Iraq War. President George H.W. Bush saw an opportunity to establish a “new world order” in which territorial aggrandizement was a product of the past, and adherence to global norms was the wave of the future. He supported a war and it was his decision to make.

Bush wanted a grand coalition operating with UN approval, not a purely American intervention. UNSCR 678 passed on 29 November 1990. It gave Saddam Hussein “one final opportunity” to withdraw from Kuwait. If he did not, the resolution, “Authorize[d] Member States… to use all necessary means” to compel him. “Operation Desert Storm” began on 17 January 1991. Nearly every country in the world joined the coalition – Yemen backed Iraq and Jordan remained neutral. Americans fought alongside 31 diverse countries’ armed forces. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Japan, South Korea, and Germany were the major funders of the war effort. In the end, the US Congress’s General Accountability Office found that Desert Shield and Desert Storm were, “fully financed from allied contributions without using US taxpayer funds” (Conahan 1991, 12). The Warsaw Pact did not provide support, but it did not interfere. The zero-sum world had ended, and the Warsaw Pact dissolved itself on 1 July 1991.

Desert Storm ended on 28 February 1991. Saddam Hussein was still president on 1 March. President Bush and Brent Scowcroft, Bush’s national security advisor, said of the decision not to remove Saddam Hussein from power, “Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream… and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs…. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq…. Had we gone the invasion route, the US could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land” (“Bush on Iraq” 1998, par. 3). The world would later learn just how accurate that assessment was.

The defeat of Saddam Hussein is often described as the peak of American power and global influence. One headline called it, “the pinnacle of American military supremacy” (Blair 2016). It resulted in the establishment of new American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia (bases that were soon used to establish “no fly” zones to protect Iraq’s Kurdish and Shia populations), and record personal popularity for President Bush. Bush decided to use the high standing of the United States, and his personal popularity, to bring an end to the Israeli/Arab conflict.

United States support for Israel has been a consistent feature of US foreign policy in the Middle East for more than 40 years. The US/Israel relationship is often portrayed as unwavering, but there are periods of tension and stark disagreements.

The British envisioned the physical land of America as a vast, mysterious frontier waiting to be conquered and exploited. They saw it as a place of potential wealth and opportunity for their own benefit. However, these images caused serious misunderstandings among the indigenous peoples.

The British approached indigenous peoples with a sense of superiority and a belief in their cultural and technological superiority. They viewed the indigenous peoples as primitive and savage, failing to recognize the complexity and richness of their societies. This has led to disregard for indigenous cultures, traditions and rights, leading to exploitation, land grabbing, forced labor and cultural assimilation.

The inability of the British colonists to understand and appreciate the way of life of native peoples perpetuated a cycle of repression, alienation and disappearance of their native cultures, with far-reaching consequences to this day. 

To learn more about Native American:

https://brainly.com/question/31445596

#SPJ4

The reason the US now dealing with its history of residential

schools is that The bodies of Indigenous children have been found in

unmarked graves at residential schools in Canada.

As per the CBC news, Upon hearing reports from Canada concerning what are thought to be unmarked grave sites for children's remains close to a former residential school, a member of the U.S. federal cabinet claimed to have sobbed.

What is the History of Residential School?

Between the mid-17th and the early 20th centuries, American Indian boarding schools—more recently known as American Indian residential schools—were founded in the country with the main goal of "civilizing" or assimilating Native American children and youth into Euro-American culture. These schools forced kids to give up their religions and languages while demeaning Native American culture.

Typically, children were exposed to European-American culture. In order to assimilate students and "Christianize" them, schools forcibly removed indigenous students' cultural symbols, including cutting their hair, making them wear American-style uniforms, prohibiting them from speaking their native tongues, and replacing their tribal names with English-language names (saints names under some religious orders).

Want to know more about  Residential School?

https://brainly.com/question/24046525

#SPJ13

Answer:

b

Explanation:

The growth and struggles of the oil industry mainly influenced Mexico's economy following World War II.

During the mid-20th century, Mexico experienced a significant economic transformation with the discovery and exploitation of its vast oil reserves.

The nationalization of the oil industry in 1938 by President Lázaro Cárdenas laid the foundation for the state-owned oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex).

The oil industry became a major source of revenue and foreign exchange earnings for Mexico, driving economic growth and contributing significantly to the country's GDP.

Mexico's oil production increased rapidly, and it became one of the world's leading oil exporters.

Know more about Mexico economy:

https://brainly.com/question/455387

#SPJ12

The women's rights movement fractured along racial lines primarily due to differing experiences and priorities shaped by the intersecting dynamics of race, gender, and class.

The mainstream women's suffrage movement in the United States was predominantly led by white women who focused primarily on securing voting rights for themselves.Women of color, particularly Black women, faced additional layers of discrimination and oppression stemming from racial inequality.The experiences of women of color, including the harsh realities of racism and segregation, led them to advocate for broader social justice issues beyond suffrage alone. They recognized that the fight for gender equality must also address the systemic racism and racial violence faced by communities of color.The mainstream suffrage movement often marginalized or excluded women of color, reinforcing racial divisions within the broader struggle for women's rights. The emphasis on a single-issue agenda and the prioritization of the concerns of white women created a division and limited the ability to build a united front.The fracturing of the women's rights movement along racial lines highlights the importance of intersectionality in understanding social justice movements. It underscores the need for recognizing and addressing the distinct experiences and challenges faced by different groups of women based on their racial identities, in order to foster a more inclusive and comprehensive movement for gender equality.

For more such questions on women's rights movement

https://brainly.com/question/14986743

#SPJ8

Answer: broke with the past completely by abolishing the last remnants of feudalism.

The magnitude of the acceleration of the block down the plane, when the rope is cut between the block and the pulley, is g(sinθ - k cosθ).

To determine the magnitude of the acceleration of the block down the plane when the rope is cut, we need to analyze the forces acting on the block.

Let's assume the block has a mass 'm' and the incline makes an angle 'θ' with the horizontal.

The forces acting on the block are:

The gravitational force (mg) acting vertically downward.The normal force (N) acting perpendicular to the incline.The frictional force (f) opposing the motion of the block down the incline.

When the rope is cut, the tension force in the rope no longer acts on the block. Therefore, we don't need to consider it in this scenario.

Now, let's analyze the forces in the direction parallel to the incline. We'll use the x-axis as the direction of motion down the incline.

The gravitational force can be resolved into two components:

The force (mg sinθ) acting parallel to the incline.The force (mg cosθ) acting perpendicular to the incline.The frictional force (f) acts in the opposite direction to the motion down the incline, so it opposes the gravitational force parallel to the incline (mg sinθ).

Since the block is moving down the incline, the net force acting on it in the x-direction is:

Net force = mg sinθ - f

According to Newton's second law (F = ma), the net force is equal to the mass of the block (m) multiplied by its acceleration (a). Therefore, we have:

mg sinθ - f = ma

To determine the magnitude of the acceleration, we need to express the frictional force (f) in terms of the other known quantities. The frictional force can be calculated as:

f = kN

where 'k' is the coefficient of kinetic friction and N is the normal force.

The normal force (N) can be calculated as:

N = mg cosθ

Substituting the value of N into the equation for f, we have:

f = k(mg cosθ)

Now, we can rewrite the equation for the net force:

mg sinθ - k(mg cosθ) = ma

Factoring out 'mg' from both terms on the left side of the equation:

mg(sinθ - k cosθ) = ma

Dividing both sides of the equation by 'm':

a = g(sinθ - k cosθ)

Comparing this equation with the options given:

A) gB) g - k sinθC) g - k cosθD) g(tanθ - k sinθ)E) g(sinθ - k cosθ)

We see that the correct answer is option E) g(sinθ - k cosθ).

Therefore, the magnitude of the acceleration of the block down the plane, when the rope is cut between the block and the pulley, is g(sinθ - k cosθ).

Learn more about magnitude of the acceleration: brainly.com/question/1597065

#SPJ11

Answer:

The 1828 Tariff of Abominations was opposed by the Southern states that contended that the tariff was unconstitutional. The protective tariffs taxed all foreign goods, to boost the sales of US products and protect Northern manufacturers from cheap British goods.

The policy about the continuation of slavery does Lincoln supported was the policy of its founders to prohibit the spread of slavery into New Territories of USA because he had no doubt that the slavery will become extinct.

According to the fragment of Abraham Lincoln's speech, it can be affirmed that he was in favor of slavery in a restricted way in the territories where they already existed without allowing its expansion to the new territories, saying:

"ALL I HAVE REQUESTED OR WANTED ANYWHERE IS TO BE REPLACED ON THE BASIS ON WHICH THE PARENTS OF OUR GOVERNMENT ORIGINALLY PLACED IT"

On the other hand, he agreed with this proposal because he did not have doubt that it would be the way to radicate slavery by limiting it to those territories where already existed, because it was going to gradually fade, saying

"I have no doubt that it would be extinguished, forever, if we went back to adopting the parenting policy."

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/20903815

Answer:

you maxed out of comments xD

Explanation:

Before the revolution, most colonies supported religious institutions with public funds and discriminated in voting and officeholding against Catholics. So, option d is correct.

Before the revolution, religious institutions in the colonies were often supported with public funds. This meant that tax revenues or government resources were used to provide financial assistance to these institutions. The rationale behind this practice was that religion played a crucial role in maintaining social order and moral values within the community.

However, it's important to note that the specific policies and practices related to supporting religious institutions varied among the different colonies. Some colonies had an established church, such as the Anglican Church in Virginia, which received direct financial support from the government. In other colonies, public funds were used more broadly to support various religious denominations.

The support of religious institutions with public funds reflected the dominant religious beliefs of the time, which were often aligned with Protestant denominations. This practice also reflected the close relationship between religion and governance during the colonial period.

Over time, as the colonies moved towards independence and the formation of a new nation, the idea of separating church and state gained prominence. The establishment of religious freedom and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution provided a legal framework for the separation of religious institutions from government support. This shift marked a significant change in the relationship between religion and the state in the United States.

To learn more about  religious institutions, here:

https://brainly.com/question/32258995

#SPJ11

Answer:

True!

Explanation:

Americans did not have jobs. The construction of the dam created work for thousands of people.

A major source of discontent among farmers in the late nineteenth century was the influx of cheap foreign labor.

Midwestern American states had a period of agricultural upheaval in the later part of the 19th century. Farmer uprisings from 1865 to 1896 resulted in the creation of a number of formal movements, including the Grange, the Populist Party, the Greenbacks, and other coalitions.

Farmers blamed moneylenders, railroad companies, and other intermediaries for engaging in monopolistic behavior for driving down prices and reducing their purchasing power. Supply and demand was a factor in the price volatility of agricultural products. As more people moved to the west, farm productivity rose.

To learn more about Farmer uprisings, click

https://brainly.com/question/11635078

#SPJ4

Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a masterpiece in the history of the American Civil Rights movement. In this letter, he focuses on the issue of civil rights.

Here are the reasons why the following main points are important Justice: Martin Luther King Jr. believed that justice is an essential part of human existence, and it's something that everyone should strive to attain. In his letter, he argues that justice is the very foundation of all human civilization. He argues that justice is essential because it creates a sense of equality among all people.

Without justice, there can be no peace, and without peace, there can be no progress. Nonviolent direct action is needed to bring about change: King believed in the effectiveness of nonviolent direct action as a means of bringing about social change. He argued that it is the most powerful tool that oppressed people have in their struggle for justice. He felt that it was essential to stand up against injustice, and the only way to do that was through peaceful and nonviolent means. Unjust laws:King argued that unjust laws exist, and when they do, they must be disobeyed.

To learn more about Civil right visit here:

brainly.com/question/14397578

#SPJ11

Answer:

Your answer is 1919

Explanation:

It wasn't until February 26, 1919, that the Grand Canyon became a national park. Hope this helped :)

Answer:

1919

Explanation:

"First protected in 1893 as a reserve and later as a national monument, it wasn't until February 26, 1919, that the Grand Canyon became a national park."

Answer:

It lasted only four weeks. About 28 days.

Explanation:

It was unsuccessful and put down by King Richard II of England , first by negotiation and then through ruthless persecution of the ringleaders.

American suffragist Alice Paul (1885-1977) was born into a prominent Quaker family in New Jersey. While attending a training school in England, she became active with the country’s radical suffragists. After two years with the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA), she cofounded the Congressional Union and then formed the National Woman’s party in 1916. Drawing on her experience, Paul led demonstrations and was subjected to imprisonment as she sought a voting amendment, but her actions helped bring about the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920. Paul continued to push for equal rights and worked from National Woman’s party headquarters

Answer:the answer is D

Explanation:

it is D

Answer:

racism is a one way thing some black people milk their ancestors being slaves when they are the one trying to get their way with what their ancestors went through

Explanation:

Answer:

firstly racism is the act prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.the social problem of racism is so bad to the society like the death of george floyd that was an act of racism

Explanation:

Dominant theoretical explanations of racial disparities in criminal offending overlook a key risk factor associated with race: interpersonal racial discrimination. Building on recent studies that analyze race and crime at the micro-level, we specify a social psychological model linking personal experiences with racial discrimination to an increased risk of offending. We add to this model a consideration of an adaptive facet of African American culture: ethnic-racial socialization, and explore whether two forms—cultural socialization and preparation for bias—provide resilience to the criminogenic effects of interpersonal racial discrimination. Using panel data from several hundred African American male youth from the Family and Community Health Study, we find that racial discrimination is positively associated with increased crime in large part by augmenting depression, hostile views of relationships, and disengagement from conventional norms. Results also indicate that preparation for bias significantly reduces the effects of discrimination on crime, primarily by reducing the effects of these social psychological mediators on offending. Cultural socialization has a less influential but beneficial effect. Finally, we show that the more general parenting context within which preparation for bias takes place influences its protective effects.

Keywords: crime, ethnic-racial socialization, parenting, race, racial discrimination

“Being black in U.S. society means always having to be prepared for antiblack actions by whites—in most places and at many times of the day, week, month, or year. Being black means living with various types of racial discrimination from cradle to grave.” (Feagin 2010:187)

Racial discrimination persists and profoundly affects the life chances and routine situations of everyday life for racial minorities in the United States (Essed 1991; Feagin 1991). Despite the persistence of racism, the influence of racial discrimination on social behaviors remains extremely underdeveloped (Brown 2008). Criminal behavior is no exception. Although scholars have long been interested in explaining racial disparities in street crime—the idea that racial discrimination might be implicated in offending was presented as early as 1899 by Du Bois (“In the case of the Negro there were special causes for the prevalence of crime … he was the object of stinging oppression and ridicule, and paths of advancement open to many were closed to him.” [p. 241])—until very recently the idea that personal experiences with racial discrimination are directly implicated in the etiology of offending has been largely unexplored. This neglect is all the more remarkable given the evidence that African Americans, particularly males, engage in more street crime than do whites (Hawkins et al. 2000).1