Con la evolución del derecho romano y con la expedición del cerebro edicto de Antonio caracalla, se extinguió la clasificación del hombres libres y esclavos, en pro de fortalecer el imperio, el fisco, ¿esto es falso o verdadero?
Answer: Verdadero
Explanation:
En el año 338 a.C., el Emperador Caracalla pone fin a la institución de la esclavitud, eliminando la distinción entre hombres libres y esclavos. Este evento no solo aporta una mayor fuerza integradora al creciente imperio, sino que además permite una mayor recaudación de fondos a través de los impuestos que los esclavos liberados deben comenzar a pagar, y que genera un beneficio fiscal para el emperador.
Antes de eso, la esclavitud había sido una institución naturalizada en el Imperio Romano, existiendo personas que nacían como esclavos, y otras que obtenían esa condición por definiciones del derecho positivo de la época.
Which activity is probably NOT related to
interstate commerce?
Abusing household pets and other
domestic animals
Breeding animals for use in national
research facilities
Answer:
Breeding animals for use in national
research facilities
Explanation:
Interstate Commerce is related to the imports and exports of goods from state to state. This is an example of interstate commerce, and Congress has doesn't have the power to impose any tax on that kind of import or export, as stated in the US Constiution.
Mark Brainliest Please!
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
What is the compare and contrast of criminology and criminal justice?
The key difference between criminology and criminal justice is that criminology focuses on the study of criminal behavior and its causes, while criminal justice involves the study of the legal system and its processes for dealing with crime.
1. Criminology is a branch of sociology that examines the nature, extent, causes, control, and prevention of criminal behavior. It aims to understand the reasons behind criminal activities and to develop strategies to prevent or reduce crime. Criminologists may study different types of crimes, such as white-collar crime, organized crime, and violent crime, as well as the effectiveness of crime prevention programs and policies.
2. Criminal justice, on the other hand, is the study of the legal system and its processes for dealing with crime. It covers various aspects of the system, including law enforcement, the courts, and corrections. Criminal justice professionals focus on the implementation and administration of laws, policies, and procedures that aim to ensure public safety, uphold the rule of law, and maintain a fair and just society.
In contrast, criminology and criminal justice also have some similarities. Both fields aim to reduce crime and maintain social order, and they often work together to achieve these goals. Professionals in both fields collaborate to develop effective crime prevention strategies, share information, and improve the overall effectiveness of the criminal justice system.
Criminology and criminal justice are distinct but interconnected fields that focus on different aspects of crime and its prevention. Criminology is concerned with understanding the causes of criminal behavior, while criminal justice focuses on the administration and enforcement of laws and policies to address crime. Both fields share a common goal of reducing crime and promoting a safe and just society.
For more information on criminology kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/28587242
#SPJ11
Those officers identified by early intervention systems face immediate and serious
discipline.
O True
O False
Answer:
TRUEE
Explanation:
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
Which reason most closely illustrates why the national government was unable to maintain law and order under the Articles of Confederation? There was no national court system. State approval was needed to pass laws. The nation had two systems of currency. The government was unable to regulate trade.
Answer:
The answer is A just took the quiz
Explanation:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government could not enforce laws because There was no national court system.
The Articles of Confederation made the national government quite weak by for instance:
Denying it the power to tax Denying it the power to create a national court systemAs a result of the federal government being unable to create a national court system, they could not try people who violated laws as only the states could and their laws were not universal.
In conclusion, the federal government could not really enforce laws as it lacked the national court system to prosecute people in.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16379544.
contracting out to private companies always leads to cheaper and more efficient delivery of public goods and services
a. true b. false
The statement "contracting out to private companies always leads to cheaper and more efficient delivery of public goods and services" is false.
Contracting out to private companies is the process of assigning responsibility for providing public goods and services to private organizations. In most cases, this is done to reduce costs and increase efficiency.
The statement "contracting out to private companies always leads to cheaper and more efficient delivery of public goods and services" is inaccurate because it is not necessarily valid for every situation. Private firms are profit-driven, and they must satisfy their shareholders' and owners' interests, whereas public entities are service-oriented and not driven by profits.
Consequently, when it comes to public services, private companies are primarily interested in maximizing profits, which may not always be compatible with the public's needs. Furthermore, private firms can cut corners in order to cut costs and increase profits. When quality is sacrificed, private entities frequently receive additional revenue streams by resolving issues in a cycle of bad service and substandard results.
To conclude, private companies may be more cost-effective, but their priority is their profits, not the public good.
Learn more about the public good: https://brainly.com/question/30889421
#SPJ11
Law is a practical discipline discipline ;theory has no place in law. With specific references to the law of contract discuss
ANSWER:
Law is a practical discipline because it is a discipline that guilds ones action, and define the rules one have to observe in taking an action
Contract law is the law that binds an agreement between two parties with a mutual intension. This law enforces what each party have to offer to the other, and what the penalty will be if one should offend the agreement.
These law can be use to describe law to be practical because the agreement which the law enforces, are their actions toward each other. These actions are described as the conducts which is abide by the contract enforced by the law.
Example; Mr Obi and Mr Michael signed an agreement to exchange their smart phone with each other. But also agreed that anyone who's smart phone is faulty when exchanged, will pay a fine and return back the phone he collected.
The law that enforces this agreement in the example above is called a contract law. This is a practical example of law, because it is law that abides their actions in the exchange of phone and passing out penalty.
What type of enforcement do domestic laws use, such as laws in the united states that prohibit murder or theft?.
Vertical enforcement. Vertical enforcement is the application of domestic laws, such as those that forbid homicide or theft in the United States.
- More about vertical enforcement :
- In order to implement a particular policy, vertical policy enforcement refers to multi-level policies that integrate governance enforcement procedures vertically.
- Such a policy is enforced, for instance, during the enterprise planning and project approval procedures as well as the service design and service portfolio management processes.
- Examples of active vertical policies include preferential currency allocation that depends on export success, R&D funding, tax breaks for businesses entering new industries.
To know more about vertical enforcement, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/28943122?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
what is the example of red lie?
red lie are lies to harm others
Explanation:
example:
Danice: Mr William Jake took your phone and smashed it on the ground
Mr William: What?
* Then Mr William argued with Jake and scolded him so therefore Danice told a red lie*
Hope it helps
A claim made with full knowledge that the opposing person already knows it to be untrue.
What is a red lie?Red lies are just about retaliation and spite. The desire to hurt others, regardless at the cost of one's own harm, drives them. "A brilliant red lie" refers to a complete fabrication or something wholly at variance with the truth. The phrase "a red stranger" is another way we describe an individual who is a complete stranger.
An example of a red lie will is:
Even though you detest the meatloaf, you proclaim to your mother that it is excellent. You do not wish to tell her buddy that she's gained a significant amount of weight and appears heavy, so you respond as she asks saying he doesn't look big in her dress. In this, there is a red lie that is presented.
Learn more about red lie, here:
https://brainly.com/question/25427223
#SPJ2
What were two concerns held by attorneys that would lead them to talk to jurors about the csi effect?
Concerns held by attorneys that would lead them to talk to jurors about the CSI effect The CSI effect is prosecutors' notion that crime packages are skewing jurors' courtroom expectancies, in the end making it more difficult to win their instances and convict defendants.
The “CSI impact” turned into first described within the media as a phenomenon because viewing forensics and crime is primarily based on television suggests. This impact impacts jurors to have unrealistic expectancies of forensic science all through a crook trial and has an effect on jurors' decisions within the conviction or acquittal technique.
The CSI effect refers to television suggests like CSI: Crime Scene research, regulation & Order, and forty-eight Hours thriller, and the effect they have on jurors. it is said that jurors who watch those sorts of indicates may additionally region a heavy emphasis on forensic technology in a case.
Learn more about CSI here:
https://brainly.com/question/17446086
#SPJ4
What are the different ways to create an ethical climate in the organization
Answer:
Important tools for building an ethical, inclusive organizational climate include core ideology, codes of ethics, preventing and eliminating destructive behaviors, fostering diversity, socializa- tion, and training.
Explanation:
credits :- wikipedia
Fingerprints are a result of oil and secretions from skin mixing with dirt.a. Trueb. False
These secretions are mostly made up of salts, oils, and water. Added to these fluids is dirt from daily activities.
a. True
Specific receptors pick up the impression of the rise in temperature and transfer the data to the central nervous system, more especially to the preoptic area, which is located close to the hypothalamus. The effector cells, in this case the secretory cells of the sweat glands, receive an efferent reaction from the brain after the information has been processed.
The aqueous-based secretions of the eccrine glands in the fingers and palms, along with extra material from sebaceous glands, particularly on the forehead, are what normally make up fingerprints. The latter contamination is the result of typical human actions like touching one's face or hair.
Learn more about Fingerprints .
https://brainly.com/question/29515076
#SPJ4
An implied contract may result from statements found in employee handbooks or other employment documants.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A contract is a signed agreement between an employer and an employee stating various ground rules as terms of employment. This is a signed and official documentation that holds both parties in an agreement.
An implied contract, on the other hand, is not a written or verbally spoken contract but is based on the actions of the parties involved. It is still legally binding and is a form of agreement between the concerned parties. And so, it can also be a result of any statements found in an employee's handbook or other employment documents.
Thus, the answer is true.
the practice established for individuals deemed a threat to society or likely to flee is:
The practice established for individuals deemed a threat to society or likely to flee is commonly known as "pretrial detention" or "remand."
In this practice, individuals are held in custody pending trial based on the belief that they pose a risk to public safety or may attempt to evade the legal process.
Pretrial detention aims to ensure the defendant's presence in court, protect the community, and maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system.
However, it is important to balance the presumption of innocence and the right to liberty with the need for public safety, as excessive or unjustified pretrial detention can lead to infringements of individual rights.
For more such questions on remand, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30555280
#SPJ11
Keeping a well-maintained vehicle is considered a "best practice" from both a security and safety perspective. True or False
Answer:
Absolutely. The answer is true.
Explanation:
Any time you transport clients you want to ensure that nothing happens from point "A" to point "B". As a result, if the vehicle suddenly becomes inoperable it places an unnecessary risk factor and vulnerability on the client's well-being. The logic here, always have a vehicle that is reliable and has been serviced routinely.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Phân tích các quan điểm cơ bản về nguồn gốc ra đời của nhà nước và pháp luật
Answer:
Remember that : means the less then sign I had to put because there is no less then sign
Prove your answer
Find the solution set for x write the inequality and represent it on a number line
-2(x+3) : 14+2x
jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday (january 5th) for the previous full week. assume juniper park senior center has a five day workweek and has an unadjuste balance in salaries expense of 510000
If jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday. The journal entry is Debit Salaries Expense $10,500; Credit Salaries Payable $10,500.
How to prepare the journal entry?The appropriate entries to record the given transactions are:
1. Dec. 31
Debit Salaries Expense $10,500
Credit Salaries Payable $10,500
(To record accrue salaries expense)
Salaries Expense = Weekly payroll ÷ Days in work week × Days to accrue
Salaries Expense = $17,500÷5×3
Salaries Expense =$10,500
(Days to accrue: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)
2. January 5
Debit salaries expenses $7,000
Debit salaries payable $10,500
9$17,500 -$7,000)
Credit Cash $17,500
(To record salaries expenses)
Therefore the entry for Dec 31 is to debit salaries expenses and credit salaries payable.
Learn more about journal entry here:https://brainly.com/question/14279491
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
jupiter park senior center has a weekly payroll of 17500 december 31 falls on wednesday, and a juniper park senior center will pay its employees the following monday (january 5th) for the previous full week. assume juniper park senior center has a five day workweek and has an unadjuste balance in salaries expense of 510000
Record the adjusting entry for accrued salaries on December 31.
Record the journal entry for payment of salaries made on January 5.
Salaries Expense:
_____ are powers necessary to exercise the formal powers in the Constitution, which logically flow from the ideas of the Constitution.
Answer:
implied powers.
Explanation:
Implied powers are powers that are not particularly defined in the constitution but are implied or "derived" such that constitutional powers given to that arm of government allow it perform or exercise that power as it becomes necessary. Example: the legislature in the United States known as Congress may pass laws and regulate healthcare since it was already stated in the constitution that congress must protect and make for defense and welfare of citizens of the United States.
Should the Supreme Court set a time frame for a “speedy trial”?
Indicate the risk management process in the correct sequence
Risk management is a critical process used to identify, assess, and manage potential risks to an organization's resources, assets, and objectives. I
1. Identify risks - This involves identifying the potential risks to the organization's resources, assets, and objectives. Risk identification can be done through a variety of methods, such as brainstorming, historical data analysis, checklists, and surveys.
2. Analyze and assess risks - This stage involves analyzing and assessing the identified risks to determine their likelihood and potential impact on the organization. The goal of this stage is to prioritize risks based on their likelihood and potential impact on the organization.
3. Develop a risk management plan - This stage involves developing a plan to manage the identified risks. The plan should include risk mitigation strategies, contingency plans, and risk response plans.
4. Implement the risk management plan - This stage involves implementing the risk management plan, including the risk mitigation strategies, contingency plans, and risk response plans. This stage is vital in ensuring that the organization is prepared to manage potential risks.
5. Monitor and review - This stage involves monitoring and reviewing the risk management plan to ensure its effectiveness. It's important to review the plan regularly to ensure that it remains up-to-date and relevant to the organization's needs.
In conclusion, the risk management process is essential for ensuring that an organization can identify and manage potential risks to its resources, assets, and objectives. Following the correct sequence of the risk management process can help ensure that the organization is prepared to manage potential risks.
For more such question on Risk management visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31063911
#SPJ8
one goal of the congress of vienna was to restore power toOne goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to the________ clergy. France. Napoleon. the monarchs.the monarchs.
One goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to the monarchs. After the Napoleonic Wars, a conference called the Congress of Vienna was held. Its primary purpose was to re-establish peace and stability in Europe after the upheavals caused by the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic Wars.
The Congress of Vienna had the authority to make decisions on behalf of the entire continent.In the early 19th century, monarchs were the most powerful people in Europe, as they held the greatest political authority. As a result, the Congress of Vienna was determined to return as much authority as possible to these monarchs to create a balance of power among nations in Europe, thereby preventing any one nation from gaining too much strength or influence.The Congress of Vienna was also successful in curbing the spread of revolution across Europe. In this sense, it helped to preserve the status quo and established a framework for lasting peace in Europe that lasted for several decades.
To know more about Monarchs visit-
brainly.com/question/27006521
#SPJ11
Pls please if you do I will report you don’t put a random answer
What is the tone of the following text, what words are used to support the tone? Explain.
The verdict in the O.J. Simpson trial has given new life to the old quip that if you ever get into trouble with the law; your fate is likely to be determined by twelve people who are not even smart enough to get out of jury duty.
The tone in the passage is a pessimistic and sad one.
What is Tone?
This refers to the mood implied by an author's word choice and the way that the text can make a reader feel.
The tone is pessimistic and sad because the author feels justice wasn't served as can be seen in 'your fate is likely to be determined by twelve people who are not even smart enough to get out of jury duty'.
Read more about Tone here https://brainly.com/question/22345646
Melvin timely filed his 2020 tax return on March 1, 2021. He was entitled to a $300 refund, which he received a few weeks later. Melvin later determined that he had failed to claim a refundable education credit for which he was eligible. The credit would have given him an even larger refund for that year.
Melvin can file an amended return to claim the refundable education credit for which he was eligible.
An amended return is a way to correct errors or omissions on a previously filed tax return. To file an amended return, Melvin would use Form 1040-X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. On this form, he would make the necessary changes to his 2020 return to include the education credit, and recalculate his tax liability. If the credit results in a larger refund, Melvin will receive the difference in the form of a refund check.
It's important to note that Melvin only have a time limit to file an amended return, Typically, the limit is 3 years from the date the original return was filed, so in Melvin's case, it would be March 1, 2024. If he files an amended return after this deadline, he will not be able to claim the credit or any additional refund.
Also, it's recommended that Melvin double-check the information on the amended return before submitting it to the IRS. An amended return may trigger an audit and that means Melvin needs to be prepared to provide all the necessary documentation to support the changes he made to the original return.
Distinguish the rights and remedies of consumers under the implied terms and conditions in the Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 with the rights and remedies of consumers under the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
The Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 and the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) have many provisions that protect the consumer's rights and remedies. Distinguishing between them is important to understand how to pursue legal action in a situation that involves an implied term.
Let's discuss them:
Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923: Implied Terms and Conditions: Goods sold by description: When goods are sold according to a particular description, they must meet that description. This means that if the product is sold as a type of fruit, it must be that type of fruit and not another. If the product fails to meet the description, the consumer has the right to reject it as long as the goods have not been accepted.
When the product is sold by sample, the goods should match the sample provided. If they do not, the consumer has the right to reject the goods.
Reasonable Quality: Goods should be of reasonable quality. This means that they should be free from defects and be fit for the purpose they were sold. If the goods fail to meet this requirement, the consumer can ask for a refund or replacement within a reasonable time frame.
If the goods are sold as second-hand, they should still be fit for their purpose and in a reasonable condition, considering their age and price.
Consumer Guarantees under the ACL: The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) guarantees consumers certain rights when purchasing goods and services. The guarantees apply regardless of any manufacturer's warranties that come with the product. They include A guarantee of acceptable quality.
A guarantee that the goods are fit for a particular purpose.A guarantee that the goods match their description.A guarantee that the goods comply with any expressed representations or promises.A guarantee of title.
Consumer Guarantees allow consumers to take legal action if they are not satisfied with the goods or services purchased, even if they have accepted them. This means that the consumer can seek a refund, replacement, or repair of the goods or services if they fail to meet any of the guarantees or are faulty. Consumer Guarantees can be enforced by the ACCC, State and Territory fair trading agencies, and consumers themselves. Thus, the consumer can be confident of their protection rights and remedies under the Sale of Goods Act NSW 1923 and the Consumer Guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
Learn more about the Sale of Goods Act:
https://brainly.com/question/32802793
#SPJ11
What did the clayton antitrust act of 1914 and the robinson-patman act of 1936 outlaw?.
Section 7 of the Clayton Act forbids mergers and acquisitions that "may significantly reduce competition or likely to create a monopoly." The Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, also prohibits some discriminatory rates, services, and concessions in merchant transactions.
Apart from prohibiting price discrimination and anti-competitive acquisitions, the new law makes strikes, boycotts, and labor unions legitimate under federal law. On June 5, 1914, the bill was carried by an overwhelming majority in the House. On October 15, 1914, President Woodrow Wilson signed it into law.The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 (RPA) is a United States antitrust statute that prohibits large franchises and chains from discriminating against small firms in pricing.Thus this is what Clayton antitrust act of 1914 and the Robinson Patman act of 1936 outlaw.
Refer here to learn more about Clayton antitrust act: https://brainly.com/question/8709214
#SPJ4
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.