Find the indicated z score. The graph depicts the standard normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. (ETR) The indicated z score is (Round to two decimal places as needed.) 20 0.8238 O

Answer:

25%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The standard form of an hyperbola is:

Where (h, k) are the coordinates of the center.

We are given the asyptotes and the foci.

The foci are (7, 0) and (7, 10)

The y value of the center of the parabola is midway from the two foci. Then, the y-coordinate of the center is 5

The coordinated of the center are (7, 5)

Now, we can use that the form of the asymptotes are:

We have:

Then:

a = 4

b = 3

Now we can write:

Answer:

-24, \(\frac{1}{24}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

An opposite number or additive inverse of any number (n) is a number which, if added to n, results in 0. The opposite number for n is written as −n.

For 24, this is -24.

A multiplicative inverse or reciprocal for a number n, is a number which when multiplied by n, their product is 1. To find the multiplicative inverse of a real number, just divide 1 by that number.  The reciprocal for n is written as \(\frac{1}{n}\) or \(n^{-1}\).

For 24, this is \(\frac{1}{24}\).

**This content involves opposite and reciprocal numbers, which you may wish to revise. I'm always happy to help!

The minimax regret criterion, also known as the minimax regret strategy, is an approach used in decision theory by economists. It aims to minimize the maximum regret that could be experienced when choosing a particular course of action.

The minimax regret criterion is a decision-making technique that takes into account the potential regret associated with each possible decision. It recognizes that decision-makers often face uncertainty and that their choices may lead to outcomes that are different from what was initially expected. By considering the worst-case scenario or maximum regret for each decision, the minimax regret criterion helps decision-makers select the option that minimizes the potential regret.

In this approach, decision-makers evaluate the consequences of their choices by comparing the actual outcome with the best outcome that could have been achieved if a different decision had been made. The minimax regret strategy focuses on minimizing the maximum regret across all possible decisions, aiming to choose the option that would result in the least regret, regardless of the actual outcome.

Economists often use the minimax regret criterion to analyze decision problems under uncertainty, particularly when the consequences of different actions cannot be precisely predicted. It provides a framework for decision-making that incorporates risk aversion and the desire to minimize the potential for regret. By considering the worst possible outcomes, decision-makers can make more informed choices that take into account the potential regrets associated with their decisions.

Learn more about outcomes here:

https://brainly.com/question/17238771

#SPJ11

To construct the exponential function that contains the points (0,-2) and (3,-128), we can use the general form of an exponential function:

y = a * b^x

where y is the function value, x is the input value, b is the base of the exponential function, and a is a constant representing the y-intercept. To find the specific exponential function that contains the two given points, we need to solve for a and b using the given coordinates.

First, we can use the point (0,-2) to find the value of a:

-2 = a * b^0
-2 = a * 1
a = -2

Next, we can use the point (3,-128) to find the value of b:

-128 = -2 * b^3
64 = b^3
b = 4

Now that we know the values of a and b, we can write the exponential function:

y = -2 * 4^x

Therefore, the exponential function that contains the points (0,-2) and (3,-128) is y = -2 * 4^x.

To view a related problem visit : https://brainly.com/question/18891502

#SPJ11

Complete question :

Jenna’s method: Mia’s method: 5(30 + 4) 5(30 + 4) (5)(30) + (5)(4) 5(34) = 170 150 + 20 = 170 Explain why both Jenna and Mia arrived at the same answer and the advantage of one method over the other.

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Jenna's method :

5(30 + 4) = 5(34) = 170

Mia’s method :

5(30 + 4) :

5(30) + 5(4)

150 + 20

= 170

With both methods, we will arrive at the same answer as justified in the workings above. However, Jenna's method gives a very simple approach and less complicated arithmetic by using the distributive property to overrode some multiplication process which Mia went through in her own calculation. Therefore, Jenna's method is less complicated and requires two simple steps at obtaining the final result.

Answer:

w = 30

Explanation:

5 times 6 is 30, therefore w = 30.

Answer:

w÷5=6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

\(X1/12=491/24\)

\(By \: cross \: multiplication,\)

\(24x=491×12\)

\(x=5892/24\)

\(x=245.5\)

The GINI coefficient is a statistical measure used to quantify income inequality within a population. It ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 represents perfect equality and 1 represents extreme inequality.

Here are the pros and cons of the GINI coefficient:

Pros:
1. Simplicity: The GINI coefficient is easy to understand and calculate, making it a widely used measure of inequality.
2. Comparative Analysis: It allows for comparison of inequality levels across different countries or regions, providing insights into the distribution of income and wealth.
3. Sensitivity to Changes: The GINI coefficient is sensitive to changes in the income distribution, making it useful for tracking trends over time.

Cons:
1. Limited Scope: The GINI coefficient does not capture all aspects of inequality, such as differences in education or health outcomes.
2. Insensitive to Middle Class Changes: It may not reflect changes in the middle-income groups, as it focuses on the extremes of the income distribution.
3. Data Limitations: The accuracy of the GINI coefficient depends on the quality and availability of data, which can vary across countries and time periods.

Comparing GINI with percentile ratio measures of inequality:
GINI coefficient provides an overall measure of inequality, while percentile ratio measures focus on specific income percentiles (e.g., top 10% vs. bottom 10%). Percentile ratios give more detailed information about the income distribution at specific points, but they may not capture the overall inequality picture. Both measures have their strengths and weaknesses and can be used in conjunction to gain a comprehensive understanding of income inequality.

To know more about measure , visit ;

https://brainly.com/question/29209971

#SPJ11

There are Physical,Chemical,Biological factors that limit distribution of biota.

Physical factors such as water temperature, flow rate, and substrate type can limit the distribution of biota. For example, some species of fish can only survive in cold water, while others prefer warmer water.

Chemical factors such as pH, dissolved oxygen, and nutrient levels can also limit the distribution of biota. For example, some species of algae can only grow in water with a high pH, while others prefer water with a low pH.

Biological factors such as competition, predation, and parasitism can also limit the distribution of biota. For example, a species of fish may be limited in its distribution by competition from another species of fish that is better adapted to the same habitat.

The dissolved oxygen level in a river can also affect the distribution of biota, with some species requiring high levels of dissolved oxygen and others being able to tolerate lower levels. The nutrient levels in a river can also affect the distribution of biota, with some species requiring high levels of nutrients and others being able to tolerate lower levels.Predation can also limit the distribution of biota, with some species being more susceptible to predation than others. Parasitism can also limit the distribution of biota, with some species being more susceptible to parasites than others.

By understanding these factors, we can better understand the ecology of rivers and how they can be managed to protect biota.

To learn more about biota click here : brainly.com/question/29125505

#SPJ11

Answer:

test score of new student = 43

Step-by-step explanation:

28 x 72 = 2016 (total points class scored)

29 x 71 = 2059 (total points class scored after student joined)

2059 - 2016 = 43

The test score of the student who joined the class is 43.

Statistics is the discipline that concerns the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data.

The mean test score of 28 students is 72.

A student joins the class and the mean becomes 71.

We have to find the test score of the student who joined the class.

28 x 72 = 2016

29 x 71 = 2059 (total points class scored after student joined)

The difference between 2016 and 2059 is the test score of new student.

2059 - 2016 = 43

Hence, the test score of the student who joined the class is 43.

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/29093686

#SPJ2

Answer:

m > 30

Step-by-step explanation:

Is that what you were looking for? :)

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

0.3>0.25

0.35<0.4

0.05<0.1

Answer:

24 square millimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a triangle is half of the base times the height.

\(\frac{1}{2} bh\)

Here, that means

\(\frac{1}{2}\)(8)(6) = 24 square millimeters

The idea of the Laffer Curve, as it is expressed mathematically, is that there is an optimal tax rate at which the government can maximize revenue. This concept is based on the idea that as tax rates increase, revenue collected by the government initially increases but eventually reaches a point at which further increases in tax rates lead to a decrease in revenue.

The Laffer Curve is used to analyze how economic policies may affect growth and stability by illustrating the trade-off between higher tax rates and revenue generation. It is often used as an argument to reduce the government's role in the economy, as increasing taxes beyond a certain point can be counterproductive.

Additionally, the Laffer Curve is related to the idea that aggregate supply increases when production costs decrease, as lower taxes can lead to lower production costs and, therefore, an increase in supply. This is a long answer that describes the various aspects of the Laffer Curve.

To know more about mathematically visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer should be \(\frac{87}{50}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

1.74 = \(\frac{174}{100}\) = \(\frac{87}{50}\)

Answer:

174% = 87/50 = 1 37/50 as a fraction

Step-by-step explanation:

174% = 174/100

Simplify (or reduce) the above fraction by dividing both numerator and denominator by the GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) between them. In this case, GCD(174,100) = 2. So,

(174÷2)/(100÷2) = 87/50 when reduced to the simplest form.

As the numerator is greater than the denominator, we have an IMPROPER fraction, so we can also express it as a MIXED NUMBER, thus 174/100 is also equal to 1 37/50 when expressed as a mixed number.

Answer:

3 + 3 = 6

8 + 8 + 8 = 24

24 + 6 = 30

31 - 30 = 1

1 inch of the board is left

Answer:

I'm sure you mean miles, but the car will travel 135 mites.

Step-by-step explanation:

(180/4)3 = 135 miles. The car will be traveling at 45 miles per hour since 180 miles divided by four hours is 45, then you can multiply that by three to get the distance the car will travel in the next three hours. A function that models this equation is f(x)=45x.

The magnitude of the vector sum of the four vectors = 278.158M

What is Magnitude?

The magnitude or size of a mathematical item defines whether it is larger or smaller than other objects of the same kind in mathematics. Formally speaking, the size of an object is the displayed outcome of an ordering—of the class of objects to which it belongs.

A = 82(cos 64 degree x +sin 64 degree y )

= 35.946 x +73.701y

B = 82 X

C= 82 Xx

D= 82 x (cos 64 degree x +sin 64 degree y)

= 35.946 x +73.701y

net = A+B+C+D

= X (35.946+82+82+35.946) + (2*73.701)

=235.892 X + 147.402Y

Magnitute = 278.158m

To learn more about Sides visit:

brainly.com/question/29082532

#SPJ4

(a) g(x) is continuous at c = 0, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that |g(x) - g(0)| < ε whenever |x - 0| < δ.

We have g(x) = √3 x, so g(0) = 0. Let ε > 0 be given. Then, for any δ > 0, we have

|g(x) - g(0)| = |√3 x - 0| = √3 |x| < √3 δ

So, to make sure that |g(x) - g(0)| < ε, we can choose δ = ε/√3. Then, whenever |x - 0| < δ, we have |g(x) - g(0)| < ε. Therefore, g(x) is continuous at c = 0.

(b) g(x) is continuous at a point c ≠ 0, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that |g(x) - g(c)| < ε whenever |x - c| < δ.

We have g(x) = √3 x, so g(c) = √3 c. Let ε > 0 be given. Then, for any δ > 0, we have

|g(x) - g(c)| = |√3 x - √3 c| = √3 |x - c|

Now, we use the identity a^3 - b^3 = (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2). Taking a = x and b = c, we have

a^3 - b^3 = (x^3 - c^3) = (x - c)(x^2 + xc + c^2)

Dividing both sides by (x - c), we get

x^2 + xc + c^2 = (x^3 - c^3)/(x - c)

Taking absolute values and simplifying, we get

|x^2 + xc + c^2| = |x - c||x^2 + xc + c^2|/|x - c| ≤ |x - c|( |x|^2 + |x||c| + |c|^2 )

Since |x - c| < δ, we can choose δ to be the smaller of ε/( |c|^2 + |c||δ| + |δ|^2 ) and 1, so that

|x^2 + xc + c^2| ≤ ε

Therefore, |g(x) - g(c)| = √3 |x - c| < ε/(|c|^2 + |c||δ| + |δ|^2), which shows that g(x) is continuous at c.

To know more about continuous function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31523914#

#SPJ11

The correct way to measure the zone of inhibition is to place a known amount of an antimicrobial agent on a solid medium.

Area is a quantity that measures the size of a two-dimensional surface or shape. It is expressed in square units such as square centimetres (cm2), square metres (m2) or square kilometres (km2). Area is used to describe the size of a garden, a house, a room, a city and much more. It can also be used to calculate the amount of material required for a project, such as paint, carpet or tiles. Knowing the area of a shape can help to calculate costs, and to make sure that enough materials are ordered.

The zone of inhibition is then measured as the area surrounding the antimicrobial agent where microbial growth has been inhibited. This area is typically measured in millimeters. To accurately measure the zone of inhibition, it is important to ensure that the size of the inoculum and the amount of antimicrobial agent used remain constant. Additionally, it is important to consider the type of organism being studied, as different organisms can have different levels of susceptibility to the antimicrobial agent. Finally, the medium used should be appropriate for the organism being studied, as different media can produce different results.

To know more about area click-
https://brainly.com/question/28012687
#SPJ1

Q = 180 ( 1.474) ^ t

This in in the form

y = a e ^ (kt)

180 is the initial value

a = 180

1.474 ^t = e^k ^ (t)

This means that e^k = 1.474

Taking the ln of each side

ln (e^k) = ln ( 1.474)

k = ln ( 1.474)

b = 1.474 which is the growth factor

b =1+r

1.474 = 1+r

r = .474

If they want r as a percent

r = 47.4 %

At 3 hours both Jacaranda and Wiles would have the same cost

Let y represent the total charges by Jacaranda and x represent the number of hours. Hence:

y = 12x + 40

Let z represent the total charges by wiles and x represent the number of hours. Hence:

z = 22x + 10

Since they are to have the same cost, hence:

y = z

12x + 40 = 22x + 10

10x = 30

x = 3 hours

Therefore at 3 hours both Jacaranda and Wiles would have the same cost.

Find out more at: https://brainly.com/question/13911928

Answer:

A. 5/7 x

D. 7/9x

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helped ♡ sorry if im wrong

Answer: 6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Since all squares are rhombi, and diagonals of a rhombus intersect at right angles, this means that

\(13x+5.5=90\\\\13x=84.5\\\\x=6.5\)

Answer:

C (x, y) - (x - 8, y + 4)

Answer:

C (x, y) - (x - 8, y + 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Got it right on Edge

Dividing the given equation by 25 we get:

Applying the natural logarithm to the above equation we get:

Finally, solving for x we get:

Answer: Option A.