Find the slope when given the two points (-7, 4) and (-14, 3) a 7 b -1/7 c 1/7 d -7

Answer:

Domain of the function

Step-by-step explanatio

The value of the error for Z, where x = 5.9 +/- 0.5 and y = 2.1 +/- 0.2, with one decimal place is 4.

To calculate the error in Z, we need to consider the uncertainties in both x and y. The error in Z can be determined by propagating the uncertainties using the formula for error propagation.

In this case, Z is given by the equation Z = x/y. To propagate the uncertainties, we use the formula for relative error:

ΔZ/Z = sqrt((Δx/x)^2 + (Δy/y)^2)

Given the uncertainties Δx = 0.5 and Δy = 0.2, and the values x = 5.9 and y = 2.1, we substitute these values into the formula:

ΔZ/Z = sqrt((0.5/5.9)^2 + (0.2/2.1)^2) = sqrt(0.0089 + 0.0181) ≈ 0.134

Multiplying this value by 100 to convert it to a percentage, we get approximately 13.4%. Rounding to one decimal place, the value of the error is 4.

Therefore, the value of the error for Z, with one decimal place, is 4.

to learn more about value  click here

brainly.com/question/30760879

#SPJ11

Answer:

f(x) = 2x + 4 domains {-1, 0, 1}

range {2, 4, 6}

(please mark brain if this helps and is correct)

Step-by-step explanation:

to solve f(x) to find the range you would want to input all the domain numbers in the equation f(x) to get the range of all the numbers you need

step 1: take the first domain number and input it into your equation where x is

ex: 2x + 4   [2(-1) + 4] = -2 + 4 = 2

step 2: add the second domain number and input it into your equation where x is

ex: 2x + 4   [2(0) + 4] = 0 + 4 = 4

step 3: add the last domain number and input it into your equation where x is

ex: 2x + 4   [2(1) + 4] = 2 + 4 = 6

Now we have determined what the range is

Answer:

Plzzzz answer fast.....

Answer:

88% I am pretty sure

Answer:

15 percent increase

Step-by-step explanation:

just is

\((x + 2)x( {x }^{2} + x + 3)\)

The general solution to the differential equation is:
x/y^5 - 2y^3 - (1/6)x/y^3 + C = 0

To find the general solution of the given differential equation:

y dx − 6(x + y^8) dy = 0

First, we need to check if the equation is exact. To do this, we find the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y:

∂/∂y (y) = 1
∂/∂x (-6(x + y^8)) = -6

Since these partial derivatives are not equal, the equation is not exact.

Next, we need to find an integrating factor, denoted by μ, to make the equation exact. We can do this by multiplying both sides of the equation by μ:

μy dx − 6μ(x + y^8) dy = 0

To make the equation exact, we need to find μ such that:

∂/∂y (μy) = ∂/∂x (-6μ(x + y^8))

Expanding these partial derivatives and simplifying, we get:

μ = e^(int(-6/(y),dy))

Integrating with respect to y, we get:

μ = e^(-6ln|y|) = 1/y^6

Multiplying both sides of the original equation by μ, we get:

y^-5 dx - 6(x/y^6 + y^2) dy = 0

This equation is exact, so we can find the solution by integrating:

f(x,y) = ∫(y^-5)dx = x/y^5 + g(y)

Taking the partial derivative of f with respect to y and setting it equal to the remaining term in the equation:

∂/∂y (x/y^5 + g(y)) = -6y^2

-5x/y^6 + g'(y) = -6y^2

g'(y) = -6y^2 + 5x/y^6

Integrating both sides with respect to y, we get:

g(y) = -2y^3 + (-1/6)x/y^3 + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Thus, the general solution to the differential equation is:

x/y^5 - 2y^3 - (1/6)x/y^3 + C = 0

To know more about differential equation refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/14620493#

#SPJ11

Jorge will receive 9 hours in time off from work.

How many hours will Jorge get to take time off?

It is given that, Jorge has done overtime for 6 hours in this week. As per the Fair Labor Standards Act, for 6 hours of overtime work, he must be paid one and a half times the pay he gets per hour.

Instead of receiving an overtime pay for working 6 hours extra, Jorge decides to receive paid leaves from work, that is, he will get one and a half of the total hours for which he worked overtime.

As a result, the time off he receives from work = \(1\frac{1}{2} (6)\) hours

\(=\frac{3}{2}(6) = 9 hours\)

Thus, Jorge gets 9 hours in time off from work in return. The time that he earns for the overtime is equivalent to the pay he was supposed to receive for the overtime work.

What is Fair Labor Standards Act?

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) specifies standards for minimum wage, over-time compensation, recordkeeping, and youth employment that are applicable to workers in the private sector and in federal, state, and municipal governments.

Learn more about time here:

https://brainly.com/question/27909325

#SPJ4

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

f(2)=4x+10

f=(4)(2)+10

f=8+10

f=18

The Confidence interval for the population proportion p is approximately 0.4832

To determine the lower bound of a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the population proportion p, we can use the formula for the confidence interval of a proportion.

The formula for the confidence interval of a proportion is given by:

CI = p ± zsqrt((p(1-p))/n)

where:

CI = confidence interval

p = sample proportion

z = z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level

n = sample size

Given:

Sample proportion (p) = 37/80 = 0.4625 (since 37 out of 80 bicycle wheels were found to have critical flaws)

Sample size (n) = 80

Desired confidence level = 95%

We need to find the z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level. For a two-sided confidence interval, we divide the desired confidence level by 2 and find the z-score corresponding to that area in the standard normal distribution table.

For a 95% confidence level, the area in each tail is (1 - 0.95)/2 = 0.025. Using a standard normal distribution table or a z-score calculator, we can find that the z-score corresponding to an area of 0.025 is approximately -1.96.

Now we can plug in the values into the formula and solve for the lower bound of the confidence interval:

CI = 0.4625 ± (-1.96)sqrt((0.4625(1-0.4625))/80)

Calculating the expression inside the square root first:

(0.4625*(1-0.4625)) = 0.2497215625

Taking the square root of that:

sqrt(0.2497215625) ≈ 0.4997215107

Substituting back into the formula:

CI = 0.4625 ± (-1.96)*0.4997215107

Now we can calculate the lower bound of the confidence interval:

Lower bound = 0.4625 - (-1.96)*0.4997215107 ≈ 0.4625 + 0.979347415 ≈ 1.4418 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the population proportion p is approximately 0.4418 (rounded to four decimal places).

Learn more about Confidence interval

brainly.com/question/29680703

Answer: (1,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

1)

x+y=3

y=-x+3

x | 0 | 3 |

y | 3 | 0 |

2)

3x+y=5

y=-3x+5

x | 0 | 2 |

y | 5 | -1 |

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Comment

This is an arithmetic series. It has the following givens.

a = 27     The first term

d = - 2       The difference between one term and the one behind it.

n = quite small

Tn = a + (n - 1)*d

tn = 27 - 2n  + 2

tn = 29 - 2n

Answer:

If the temperature was -6 °C in the morning, and it is increasing by 11 °C every hour, it will be at least 2 °C after (-6 - 2) / 11 = <<(-6-2)/11=0.45>>0.45 hours.

Since the temperature is measured in hours, and a fraction of an hour cannot be measured, the temperature will be at least 2 °C after 1 hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the average If i do 2 15 16 then do 2+15+16 =33 then divide that by 3

33 divided by 3 is 11 so all would be the average

If the medical procedure costs $4500 and the insurance covers 7/8 of the cost, then the amount of the procedure that the insurance covers can be calculated as:

Amount covered by insurance = (7/8) x ($4500)

We can simplify this expression by first finding the value of 7/8 as a decimal:

7/8 = 0.875

Substituting this value back into the expression, we get:

Amount covered by insurance = (0.875) x ($4500)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

Amount covered by insurance = $3,937.50

Therefore, the insurance covers $3,937.50 of the procedure cost.

to know more about cost:

brainly.com/question/30045916

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

ab² + 2a²b + a³ = a(b² + 2ab + a²)

Here variable 'a' is common in all the terms. HCF = a

2) 2ab² = 2 * a * b *b

   4a²b = 2 * 2 *a * a * b

6a³        = 2 * 3 * a * a * a

HCF = 2a

2ab² - 4a²b - 6a³ = 2a(b² - 2ab - 3a²)

The expected value of x in Exhibit 5-5 is 30.

The expected value of x is the average of the outcomes weighted by their respective probabilities.

This means that the expected value is determined by summing the product of each outcome and its respective probability. For Exhibit 5-5, the expected value is calculated as (0 x 0.1) + (10 x 0.4) + (20 x 0.4) + (30 x 0.1) = 30. Therefore, the expected value of x in Exhibit 5-5 is 30.

To explain further, expected value is a measure of central tendency that is used to evaluate a probability distribution. It is the sum of all possible outcomes multiplied by their respective probabilities, which helps us understand the behavior of a random variable.

In Exhibit 5-5, the random variable x has four possible outcomes (0, 10, 20, 30) and four corresponding probabilities (0.1, 0.4, 0.4, 0.1). By multiplying each of these outcomes by their respective probabilities and summing them together, we can calculate the expected value. In this case, the expected value of x is 30.

To know more about central tendency click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/26220590#

#SPJ11

The test statistic (-2600) is much smaller than the critical value (1.645), we can reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, based on the given sample, the Republican candidate has a chance to win the election.

To determine if the Republican candidate has a chance to win, we can conduct a hypothesis test using the given information.

Let's set up the hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The proportion of voters planning to vote for the Republican candidate is equal to or less than the proportion of registered Democrats.

Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): The proportion of voters planning to vote for the Republican candidate is greater than the proportion of registered Democrats.

Now, we can calculate the test statistic and compare it to the critical value.

First, we need to calculate the standard error of the proportion:

SE = sqrt(p * (1 - p) / n)

where p is the proportion of registered Democrats and n is the sample size.

p = 0.55 (given)

n = 1200 (sample size)

SE = sqrt(0.55 * (1 - 0.55) / 1200)

SE = sqrt(0.55 * 0.45 / 1200)

SE = sqrt(0.022275 / 1200)

SE ≈ 0.015

Next, we calculate the test statistic:

z = (x - μ) / SE

where x is the number of voters planning to vote for the Republican candidate and μ is the expected number of voters based on the proportion of registered Democrats.

μ = p * n

μ = 0.55 * 1200

μ = 660

z = (621 - 660) / 0.015

z = -39 / 0.015

z ≈ -2600

Finally, we compare the test statistic to the critical value at a significance level of α = 0.05.

Since the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of voters planning to vote for the Republican candidate is greater than the proportion of registered Democrats, we will perform a one-tailed test.

Using a standard normal distribution table or software, the critical value for a one-tailed test at α = 0.05 is approximately 1.645.

Since the test statistic (-2600) is much smaller than the critical value (1.645), we can reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, based on the given sample, the Republican candidate has a chance to win the election.

To learn more about hypothesis  click here:

brainly.com/question/10698956

#SPJ11

The solution range of the inequality {5x+7<3  and  3x-4>11} to is in range : x < -4/5 or x > 5.

Given are the following inequalities -

5x+7<3  and  3x-4>11

We have -

5x + 7 < 3

5x < - 4

x < -4/5

and

3x - 4 > 11

3x > 15

x > 5

So, we can write the solution of the inequality as -

x < -4/5 or x > 5

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is in range : x < -4/5 or x > 5.

To solve more questions on inequalities, visit the link below -

brainly.com/question/1782515

#SPJ1

x>8 and x<2 are the two possible inequalities of |x - 5| > 3

a relationship between two expressions or values that are not equal to each other is called 'inequality.

Let x be the number

|x - 5| > 3

Now solve for x.

Suppose x - 5 is positive.  Then

x - 5 > 3

x > 8

Suppose x - 5 is negative.  Then |x - 5| = -(x - 5) = 5 - x

5-x>3

5-3>x

2>x

x<2

Hence, x>8 and x<2 are the two possible inequalities of |x - 5| > 3

To learn more on Inequality click:

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ1

The point- slope form of the line is y-5 = -0.25(x+6).

What is line?

A line is an one-dimensional figure. It has length but no width. A line can be made of a set of points which is extended in opposite directions to infinity. There are straight line, horizontal, vertical lines or may be parallel lines perpendicular lines etc.

A line with a slope of –1/4 passes through the point (–6,5)

Any line in point - slope form can be written as

y - y₁= m(x -x₁) -------(1)

where,

y= y coordinate of second point

y₁ = y coordinate of first point

m= slope of the line

x= x coordinate of second point

x₁ = x coordinate of first point

In the given problem (x₁ , y₁) = (-6,5) and m= -1/4

Putting all these values in equation (1) we get,

y-5= (-1/4) (x- (-6))

⇒ y-5 = -0.25(x+6)

Hence, the point- slope form of the line is y-5 = -0.25(x+6).

To know more about line

brainly.com/question/13763238

#SPJ1

After direct variation y = -4 when x = -3.

So,

The initial statement is y = kx

Then to find y when x = -3.

When x = -3:

Therefore, y = -4 when x = -3.

Know more about direct variation here:

brainly.com/question/6499629

#SPJ4

The df value for Monica's analysis is 98.

To calculate the degrees of freedom (df) for the Pearson correlation

coefficient, we need to know the sample size, which is the number of

observations or pairs of scores.

In this case, the sample size is 100 because Monica collected data from

100 people.

The formula for calculating the degrees of freedom for the Pearson

correlation coefficient is:

df = n - 2

where n is the sample size.

So, in this case, the degrees of freedom (df) would be:

df = 100 - 2 = 98

Therefore, the df value for Monica's analysis is 98.

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/1781657

#SPJ11

Binding constraints directly influence the optimal solution in a linear Programming problem, whereas constraints with positive slack are non-binding and do not directly impact the solution.

binding constraints and positive slack in the context of linear programming. In a linear programming problem, we aim to find the optimal solution for an objective function, given a set of constraints. The terms "binding constraints" and "positive slack" are related to these constraints.

1. Binding constraints: These are constraints that directly impact the optimal solution of the problem. In other words, they "bind" the feasible region (the area where all the constraints are satisfied) and affect the maximum or minimum value of the objective function. Binding constraints are active constraints, as they influence the final solution.

2. Positive slack: Slack is the difference between the left-hand side and right-hand side of a constraint when the constraint is satisfied. If this difference is positive, it means that there is some "extra" or "unused" resource in that constraint. Positive slack indicates that the constraint is non-binding, meaning it does not directly impact the optimal solution. It shows that there is some room for the constraint to be further tightened without affecting the final outcome.

In summary, binding constraints directly influence the optimal solution in a linear programming problem, whereas constraints with positive slack are non-binding and do not directly impact the solution. Knowing the difference between these terms can help you better understand and analyze linear programming problems.

To Learn More About Programming

https://brainly.com/question/24361247

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. All numbers are rational numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

In mathematics, any number that can be stated in fraction form or ratios is said to be a rational number. This simply means that some numbers cannot be written in fraction form and so all numbers are not rational numbers.

Examples of rational numbers include terminating decimals, integers, repeating decimals and the fractions.  

The other non-rational numbers are called irrational numbers, as they cannot be written in fraction form.

Hence, there are 725,760 ways to seat the ten people together in a row, taking into account the two individuals who insist on sitting side-by-side.

If two of the ten people insist on sitting side-by-side, we can consider them as a single entity or a pair. So, essentially, we have nine entities (including the pair) to be seated in a row.

The number of ways to arrange these nine entities in a row is 9!, which is the factorial of 9.

However, within the pair, the two individuals can be arranged in 2! = 2 ways.

Therefore, the total number of ways to seat the ten people together, considering the pair as one entity, is 9! * 2!.

Simplifying this expression:

9! * 2! = 9 * 8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 * 2 = 725,760

To know more about ways to seat,

https://brainly.com/question/31464578

#SPJ11

Given polynomial to us is \( 14x^5-28x^4+7x^2\)

According to the question we need to factor it in the form of \( 7x^2(?)\) , and we need to find the value of "?" .

For that divide the whole polynomial by \(7x^2\) . We would get ,

\(\longrightarrow \dfrac{14x^5-28x^4+7x^2}{7x^2}\\\)

we can write it as,

\(\longrightarrow \dfrac{14x^5}{7x^2}-\dfrac{28x^4}{7x^2}+\dfrac{7x^2}{7x^2}\\ \)

simplify,

\(\longrightarrow 2x^3-4x^2+1\)

Hence the final factored form will be,

\(\longrightarrow \underline{\underline{ 7x^2(2x^3-4x^2+1)}}\)

and we are done!

Answer:

\(7x^2(2x^3-4x^2+1)\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given polynomial:

\(14x^5-28x^4+7x^2\)

Rewrite the numbers as multiples of 7:

\(\implies 7 \cdot 2x^5-7 \cdot 4x^4+7 \cdot 1x^2\)

Factor out the common term 7:

\(\implies 7(2x^5-4x^4+x^2)\)

Rewrite the exponents as sums:

\(\implies 7(2x^{2+3}-4x^{2+2}+x^{2+0})\)

\(\textsf{Apply exponent rule} \quad a^{b+c}=a^b \cdot a^c\)

\(\implies 7(2x^{2}x^3-4x^{2}x^2+x^{2}x^0)\)

\(\implies 7(2x^{2}x^3-4x^{2}x^2+1x^{2})\)

Factor out the common term x²:

\(\implies 7x^2(2x^3-4x^2+1)\)

the probability of all three cubes landing on odd numbers given that the white cube landed on three is 1/24

Since the white cube landed on 3, we only need to consider the red and green cubes.

The probability of each cube landing on an odd number is 1/2, since there are 3 odd numbers out of 6 total on each cube.

The probability of both the red and green cubes landing on odd numbers is the product of their individual probabilities:

P(red and green both odd) = P(red odd) x P(green odd) = 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4

Therefore, the probability of all three cubes landing on odd numbers given that the white cube landed on three is:

P(white=3 and red and green both odd) = P(red and green both odd | white=3) x P(white=3)

= (1/4) x (1/6) = 1/24

So the probability of all three cubes landing on odd numbers given that the white cube landed on three is 1/24

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

6*5+11=41

4*5+21=41

Step-by-step explanation:

therefore, Liam has 41 chairs in total