General Motors recalled millions of vehicles in 2014 for faulty ignition switches that caused the vehicles to "inadvertently shut off, stiffening steering and brakes and causing airbags not to deploy." The defect was linked to 124 deaths and 275 injuries. GM officials acknowledged that GM had been aware of the defective switches since 2004. Indeed, the company had notified dealers in 2005 that customers should be warned that using "cluttered and heavy key chains" should be avoided. But the company did not take steps to correct the problem until 2014. The "old" GM had filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 in June 2009. As part of the July 10, 2009, restructuring agreement, the "old" corporation remained responsible for legal claims for accidents that occurred before the bankruptcy filing, and the "new," reorganized corporation "was granted protection from previous claims."* Given that a number of accidents involving the faulty switches occurred before GM filed for bankruptcy, GM faces accusations that the old GM "intentionally and fraudulently concealed the defective ignition switch issue from the bankruptcy court." Certain lawyers assert that successor liability should be applied to the new, reorganized company because the same executives, headquarters, plant facilities, and product lines that existed in the old company continue to exist in the new company. "The new G.M. knew all about it. G.M. didn’t change officers or personnel. All it did was sell to a newly funded entity." Imposing successor liability is not easy, however, as a plaintiff would have to show that GM knew about both the defect and its gravity, and then willfully covered them up during its bankruptcy proceeding.
Should GM use the company’s bankruptcy restructuring agreement as a "legal shield" when deciding whether to make payments to the families of those killed because of the faulty switches, as well as those who were injured? Why or why not?
Was filing for bankruptcy protection without disclosing the potential for liability arising out of the faulty switches fraudulent? Does it matter who within the company was aware of the problems?
Even if GM acted legally, did it act ethically?

Answer:b

Explanation:

Answer:

im most fascinated with the fact that they lean on people necks and choke them it is wrong and has caused deaths . I think i am intrigued by this because it is wrong and needs to change.

Answer: Your welcome!

Explanation:

In order to make an ACHS inquiry via CLETS, you must have a valid CLETS terminal operator certificate and a valid ACHS inquiry authorization number. The terminal operator certificate is issued by the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and is required to access the CLETS system. The ACHS inquiry authorization number is issued by the DOJ and is required to access the ACHS system. These two items are necessary in order to make an ACHS inquiry via the CLETS system.

Go live in L'Manburg.

Answer:

ayyy dass my cuz right there thx so much have a good day :)

Answer:

thanks so much have a blessed day

The USMCA, or United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement, is a trade pact between the three nations. The North American Free Trade Binding Agreement was superseded by the USMCA (NAFTA).

A free-trade area was established in North America when Canada, Mexico, and the United States signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1992. zone in North America. The majority of the items produced by the signing countries were immediately free of tariffs under NAFTA.

The new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will encourage trade that benefits all three countries, resulting in more open markets, equitable trade, and strong economic growth in North America.

To know more about Binding Agreement visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29335454

#SPJ4

Texas law requires any person driving a vehicle to stop no less than  15 feet from the nearest rail of a railroad crossing.

Law can be defined as the regulation or rules and regulation which a person is expected to abide by.

The Texas law want driver to often stop at least 15 feet if there is a signal that a rail is approaching the railroad so as to avoid colliding with rail and to prevent loss of life.

Therefore Texas law requires any person driving a vehicle to stop no less than  15 feet from the nearest rail of a railroad crossing.

Learn more about Texas law here:https://brainly.com/question/6865491

#SPJ1

Answer:

the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.

Explanation:

they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps

Lionel may be able to recover damages for the damage to his car's fenders caused by Reginald's negligence. However, since Lionel was also negligently driving at excessive speed, he may be partially at fault for the accident.

In such cases, the legal concept of comparative negligence comes into play. This means that the total damages awarded to Lionel could be reduced based on the proportion of his fault in the accident.

For example, if a court determines that Lionel was 30% at fault for the accident and Reginald was 70% at fault, Lionel's recovery might be limited to 70% of the total damages.

This could include the cost of repairing his car's fenders, as well as any medical expenses and lost wages resulting from his personal injuries. However, the specific recovery Lionel can obtain depends on the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the accident occurred.

Some jurisdictions may apply a contributory negligence rule, which could prevent Lionel from recovering any damages if he is found to be even partially at fault. It's important to consult with a legal professional for specific advice in such cases.

Learn more about negligence at

https://brainly.com/question/29829593

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn. Anyone may conduct the prosecution, either personally or through a pleader.

For a trial waiting in a Magistrate Court, the victim/complainant or his lawyer may conduct prosecution if the Magistrate Court allows it. If such permission is provided, the prosecution is going to be conducted entirely by the victim and his lawyer. This can occur even in cases instituted in the basis of a charge sheet filed by police; however, the limitation is that the case must be triable by a Magistrate (rather than a Sessions Court) and the Magistrate must permit it.

Thus, once authorized to prosecute the offence, a private prosecutor must continue to prosecute the case until the end of the trial, even if the authority has been revoked or otherwise withdrawn.

Learn more about prosecutor, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12057544

#SPJ2

Answer:  A tort is an act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. In the context of torts, "injury" describes the invasion of any legal right, whereas "harm" describes a loss or detriment in fact that an individual suffers.

Explanation:

Limited partners are best described as partners that make only a limited financial contribution to a partnership. option b is correct option.

Limited partners are investors who provide capital to a partnership but do not take an active role in the management of the business. In a limited partnership, there are both general partners, who manage the business and are personally liable for the partnership's debts, and limited partners, who are passive investors and have limited liability for the partnership's debts. Limited partners typically receive a portion of the partnership's profits, but this portion is smaller than what the general partners receive. The limited partners' liability is limited to the amount of their investment in the partnership.

For such more question on financial

https://brainly.com/question/13999832

#SPJ4

if you copy like see it before thinking of it then yes

if not then no

Question:

Is it technically cheating if you use these answers for yourself?

Answer:

The answer to your question would actually be yes, and no.

Explanation:

If you would state it word for word that would be cheating because your just copying someone else's work that would be called plagiarism, but if you only used it as a resource and changed it into your own words it wouldn't be considered cheating.

I hope it helps you!

~XxBells is a cute girlxX~

#Learn with Brainly

If the driver of the other car had insufficient insurance, John and Mary's uninsured/underinsured motorist policy would provide them with insurance coverage. It aids in paying for medical costs and missed earnings due to the accident.

John and Mary's insurance policy should include uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, which would protect them if the other car driver's coverage was insufficient. This coverage is intended to protect policyholders in the event of a collision with a motorist who does not have insurance or has insufficient insurance coverage.

The first motorist in this case had no insurance, and the second driver had only the bare minimum of liability coverage. Because John and Mary have full coverage with medium-high limits, their uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage should cover their medical expenses and lost wages as a result of the accident.

Learn more about insurance:

https://brainly.com/question/30291521

#SPJ1

primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped

Answer:

civil court

Explanation:

Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court.

Court, sometimes known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide matters involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.

A number of small civil concerns are handled by civil courts, such as: consumer disputes; landlord and tenant conflicts (such as eviction, rent arrears, and repairs); (eg as faulty goods)

Tort claims, breach of contract proceedings, and landlord/tenant disputes are the three most frequent civil cases. A civil case often goes through the following stages: filing a complaint, gathering evidence, conducting a trial, and appealing the decision.

Most frequently, a judge will hear them alone and reach a decision by gathering evidence and using the pertinent legal standards. Arguments may be made regarding the veracity of the facts and the precise nature of the law. The judge will render a reasoned decision following the conclusion of the argument.

Therefore, The answer is civil court.

Learn more about Court, here;

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ2

The document that would accomplish Henry's goal of granting his oldest child the right to make medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated is option D) Durable power of attorney for health care (DPOAHC).

A Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care is a legal document that allows an individual (the principal) to designate someone (the agent or attorney-in-fact) to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so themselves. This document ensures that Henry's wishes regarding his medical treatment and care are respected and followed, even if he is unable to communicate or make decisions.

Unlike a living will, which only specifies a person's preferences for end-of-life care, a DPOAHC grants broader decision-making authority to the designated agent. It allows the agent to make medical decisions in a variety of situations, not just limited to end-of-life care.

By selecting the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, Henry can ensure that his oldest child has the legal authority to act as his healthcare advocate and make important medical decisions on his behalf if he becomes incapacitated due to his poor health.

Learn more about attorney here:

https://brainly.com/question/31861735

#SPJ4

Joe, who lives in State Joe's lawsuit will be dismissed by the judge unless the damages sought are more than $75,000. Thus, option (b) is correct.

This is due to the requirement that the damages at issue must exceed $75,000 in order for a plaintiff to proceed with a federal court lawsuit based on diversity of citizenship, which is the circumstance in which the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states.

Even though there is complete diversity of citizenship, the plaintiff cannot bring a lawsuit in federal court if the sum sought is $75,000 or less. It is crucial to remember that various courts may have varying jurisdictional restrictions, therefore claimants should confirm the jurisdictional prerequisites of the particular court where they intend to submit their complaint.

Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on lawsuit, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ1

Answer:William the Conqueror's 1066 invasion of England furthered the concept of law in ways still practiced today by introducing the Norman legal system to England[1][2][3]. This system was based on the idea of a centralized monarchy and a strong, uniform legal code, which helped to establish the rule of law and reduce the power of local lords[1][2]. The Norman legal system also introduced the concept of trial by jury, which is still used in many countries today[1][3]. Additionally, the invasion led to the compilation of the Domesday Book, a comprehensive survey of land ownership and taxation that helped to establish a more efficient and equitable system of taxation[1][3].

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

After filing the initial pleadings and motions, the parties gather evidence through a process known as discovery.

In common law jurisdictions, discovery is the pre-trial stage of a case during which each party can acquire evidence from the opposing party or parties through the use of discovery tools such as interrogatories, demands for the production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Subpoenas can be used to acquire discovery from non-parties. When a discovery request is opposed, the asking party may file a move to compel discovery to ask the court for help.

Civil discovery is broad in scope under US law and may ask for the revelation of information that is logically expected to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This criteria is significantly more inclusive than relevance because instead of looking at material that is actually relevant, we explore evidence that might be relevant.

To know about evidence refer:

https://brainly.com/question/23323608

#SPJ4

It voilates publicity rule of law

The right of publicity prohibits the unpermitted commercial exploitation of a person's name, likeness, or other easily recognizable characteristics. It grants a person the only authority to provide a license for the use of their name in commercial marketing. The right to publicity is mainly protected by state common or statutory law in the United States. A right to publicity has only been formally recognized by around half of the states. In several states, the legislation against unfair competition safeguards the right to publicity. The right to publicity is supported by legal actions for misappropriation of property or for falsely representing that someone produced or endorsed a product. Check out Unfair competition.

To know more about publicity rule refer to https://brainly.com/question/11549811

#SPJ4

Answer:

A usually calm football player who hits another player in a moment of anger

Explanation:

I came here looking for the answer but that's what makes sense. The rest are examples of secondary deviance due to their history. This football player is usually calm, therefore it is primary deviance.

It is true, The basic rule in observing hand signals given by german police officers is that traffic parallel to the outstretched arms of the officer may proceed.

German police officers' hand signals generally mean that traffic should go forward in a straight line parallel to their extended arms. According to German legislation, every car must include a first aid kit, a portable red reflector triangle, and at least two safety jackets (reflective vests). The triangle must be positioned 200 metres behind any stopped vehicle on the autobahn & 100 metres behind any other vehicle.

Driving and overtaking are done on the left in Germany. Vehicles on the right may pass those on the left when there are two or more lanes of traffic travelling in the same direction and there are queues of heavy traffic.

To know more about German legislation:

brainly.com/question/1061130

#SPJ4

In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.

In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.

The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.

Learn more about federal structure at:

brainly.com/question/31417366

#SPJ4

Answer:

bus what languages not able to understand jio to Baramma that he looked another jio your Venum Kan Lulu gi

Answer:

its a

Explanation:

Answer: A. The electrical force is reduced.

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.

-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.

The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

Explanation:

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

Explanation: