(Giving 50 points) why is it important to the story to describe all the parts of the Native American town? A: to explain how it is similar to towns today. B: so you know where to go. C: because e you have to give out directions. D: it may take a long time to walk from your house to the religious activities.
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
thats the only one that makes sense to me
Related Questions
1. When someone gives you something, a natural desire is to .............. Nothing is done out of good intentions, and one should expect to return the favor.
a) turn it down
b) give it back
c) find it out
d) go along
Answers
When someone gives you something, a natural desire is to option b. give it back Nothing is done out of good intentions, and one should expect to return the favor.
It is a common human tendency to feel a sense of obligation when receiving a gift or favor from someone else. This is often driven by social norms, cultural expectations, and a desire to maintain a sense of fairness and balance in relationships. Reciprocity is a fundamental aspect of human social interaction.
It is based on the principle of mutual exchange and cooperation. When someone gives you something, it creates a social debt or obligation, and the natural response is to give something back in return. This can be seen as a way to maintain a harmonious relationship and to demonstrate gratitude and appreciation.
Giving something back can take various forms depending on the situation. It could involve returning a physical gift, providing a favor or service in return, or simply expressing sincere thanks and showing kindness in other ways. The specific act of reciprocation will depend on the nature of the gift, the relationship between the individuals involved, and the cultural context. Therefore, the correct answer is option b.
know more about cultural here:
https://brainly.com/question/26152858
#SPJ8
From "The Tyranny of Things" by Elizabeth Morris
Once upon a time, when I was very tired, I chanced to go away to a little house by the sea. "It is empty," they said, "but you can easily furnish it." Empty! Yes, thank Heaven! Furnish it? Heaven forbid! Its floors were bare, its walls were bare, its tables there were only two in the house were bare. There was nothing in the closets but books; nothing in the bureau drawers but the smell of clean, fresh wood; nothing in the kitchen but an oil stove, and a few a very few dishes; nothing in the attic but rafters and sunshine, and a view of the sea. After I had been there an hour there descended upon me a great peace, a sense of freedom, of in finite leisure. In the twilight I sat before the flickering embers of the open fire, and looked out through the open door to the sea, and asked myself, "Why?" Then the answer came: I was emancipated from things. There was nothing in the house to demand care, to claim attention, to cumber my consciousness with its insistent, unchanging companionship. There was nothing but a shelter, and outside, the fields and marshes, the shore and the sea. These did not have to be taken down and put up and arranged and dusted and cared for. They were not things at all, they were powers, presences.
And so I rested. While the spell was still unbroken, I came away. For broken it would have been, I know, had I not fled first. Even in this refuge the enemy would have pursued me, found me out, encompassed me.
If we could but free ourselves once for all, how simple life might become! One of my friends, who, with six young children and only one servant, keeps a spotless house and a soul serene, told me once how she did it. "My dear, once a month I give away every single thing in the house that we do not imperatively need. It sounds wasteful, but I don’t believe it really is. Sometimes Jeremiah mourns over missing old clothes, or back numbers of the magazines, but I tell him if he doesn’t want to be mated to a gibbering maniac he will let me do as I like."
The old monks knew all this very well. One wonders sometimes how they got their power; but go up to Fiesole, and sit a while in one of those little, bare, white-walled cells, and you will begin to understand. If there were any spiritual force in one, it would have to come out there.
I have not their courage, and I win no such freedom. I allow myself to be overwhelmed by the invading host of things, making fitful resistance, but without any real steadiness of purpose. Yet never do I wholly give up the struggle, and in my heart I cherish an ideal, remotely typified by that empty little house beside the sea.
Which central idea is not discussed in Morris’s essay?
a
The loss of things
b
The beauty of things
c
The passion for things
d
The call for things
Answers
The beauty of things is the central idea is not discussed in Morris’s essay. Hence, option B is correct.
What is the concept of the passage?The Tyranny of Things by Elizabeth Morris describes how the speaker believes that common objects have turned into unneeded clutter in our lives. She discusses how, as social creatures, we love to store things—even ones that aren't actually necessary. She describes how objects have accumulated in our life, "obstructing" our open spaces and reducing our ability to see the outer world.
She describes how she finds comfort in the emptiness of space in the excerpt provided. She responded when somebody suggested she fill the vacant place "Empty! Yes, praise God! Decorate it? God forbid!" Instead, she appreciates how "uncluttered" the house is, how it gave her "a sensation of freedom, of endless leisure," and how it is empty.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about concept of the passage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10334479
#SPJ1
True/False (2pts)
32
1. The central idea of a text or story is the author's main point or message to the reader.
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Each text or story tries to convey some message
Question 2 of 5
Scientists predict that the human population will continue to increase. Which
two events will likely happen as a result?
O A. More trees will be cleared from land.
B. More oxygen will form in the atmosphere.
C. More fossil fuels will be used for cars.
D. More water will flow into watersheds.
Answers
Answer:
A. More trees will be cleared from land.
C. More fossil fuels will be used for cars.
Explanation:
Considering the given scenario, the increase in the human population will definitely lead to several changes in the way the earth is utilized. So, if the human population is to increase, then more lands will have to be cleared for settlement and also lead to more fossil fuels to be used by them.
Out of the given options, the case of more lands cleared and increased usage of fossil fuels are two events that will likely happen. Increased formation of oxygen is not one that will be an effect of human population increase, for humans don't produce oxygen but rather plants do. And so, if more lands are cleared, then that'll mean lesser trees. Moreover, more fossil fuels will be used up by humans in their automobiles. And water consumption will also be increased as humans can’t survive without water.
Thus, the correct answers are options A and C.
Answer:
a and c
Explanation:
Must explain your reasoning when answering. If correct will give brainliest
Answers
Answer:
It is D
Explanation:
An allusion is a type of figure of speech, meaning it is something like “chocolate cake is my Achilles heel”, an Achilles heel is a weakness, so the writer is saying chocolate cake is their weakness.
What role did Private Hugh White and Edward Gerrish have in the Boston Massacre?
Answers
Answer:
Monday, March 5, 1770, was a chilly day. Snow from a recent storm still lined the streets. That evening, Private Hugh White was stationed at a guard post on King Street. The post was near the Customs House, where British Officials collected duties. Some time after 8 pm a few young men approached White and began to taunt him.
The soldier grew angry and made a move that perhaps changed the course of history. White swung his heavy gun and dealt a blow to one of the youth, Edward Garrick on the side of the head. The crowd immediately saw this as the soldier’s attack on a “peaceful” civilian. The anger energized the mob. When the word spread on the streets the crowd started growing and continued to insult White. As more people gathered, White climbed the steps of the Customs House to stand above the crowd. He loaded the gun and said that he would fire if the crowd attacked. Instead the crowd started throwing chunks of ice at the soldier. Angry and frightened White called for help. Soon Captain Preston arrived with seven men to help White.
The events that unfolded minutes later became one of the biggest symbols of American Revolution. We can only speculate how the night would have turned out if White managed to stay in control and refrained from hitting Garrick or perhaps called for backup earlier. But his emotional state must also be taken in consideration. It is a well known fact that the British regulars in Boston were abused and mistreated not only by Bostonians but by their own officers.
Explain in detail what was going on in this chapter from your chosen point of view. Pay attention to DICTION/DIALECT (how
the character might speak). 100 WORDS (PLEASE HELP ASAP)
Answers
How does 11 paragraph contribute to the authors argument about students and mentors
Answers
The author's argument is predicated on the idea that the interaction between students and mentors is essential to the educational process.
The importance of mentors in directing and influencing students' growth is emphasized by the author. Mentors offer students insightful advice, support, and encouragement through their experience and expertise.
The author probably goes into more detail about the advantages of mentors for students in paragraph 11. They might talk about how mentors act as role models by providing advice and subject matter knowledge in their specialties.
The passage could provide illustrations of effective mentoring relationships and the transforming impact they have on students' intellectual and personal development.
Learn more about students and mentors here:
brainly.com/question/29862377
#SPJ1
which phone iS better iphone 12 or 11
Answers
Answer:
well I feel like the 12 becuase its newer but they are both good
Explanation:
Answer:
12 all the way
Explanation:
my mom had the 11 and i have the 12 you could just tell the difrence OMG
When breaking news is happening, anchors and correspondents should broadcast the story with _______ , or right away.
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include options, we can say the following.
When breaking news is happening, anchors and correspondents should broadcast the story with accuracy, or right away.
That is the job of a good journalist working as a correspondent or anchor. He/she knows that other news channels or stations are going to report the news. There is competence between networking to caught more viewers. So correspondents have to move fast transmitting breaking news but accurately. If they miss something important, have no reliable sources, or the news is not confirmed, they can compromise their credibility.
Discuss in 3-5 sentences your stand regarding the denial of
franchise of ABS-CBN
Answers
Answer: Discuss in 3-5 sentences your stand regarding the denial of
franchise of ABS-CBNDiscuss in 3-5 sentences your stand regarding the denial of
franchise of ABS-CBNDiscuss in 3-5 sentences your stand regarding the denial of
franchise of ABS-CBN
Explanation:
Discuss in 3-5 sentences your stand regarding the denial of
franchise of ABS-CBN
What do Van Helsing and the other vampire hunters stumble upon when they enter the Harkers' bedroom after performing the medial procedure on Renfield?
A. A wolf with red eyes hiding in the closet.
B. A green mist has filled the room and seems to be closing in around Jonathan and Mina.
C. Mina drinking from an open vein on Dracula's chest.
D. Dracula drinking blood from Mina's jugular vein.
Answers
Answer: is your cat profile picture getting strangeled?
Explanation:
At the age of 13, what does Juliet think of marriage.
Answers
Answer:
When Lady Capulet inquires about Juliet's feelings about marriage, she responds, "It is an honour I dream not of"
She's indifferent and doesn't have any particular desire to be married.
someone please answer this question
Answers
Explain WHY or WHY NOT the sentence that follows is compound: Old MacDonald had a dog Bingo was his name.
Answers
I probably won't be able to tell you exactly, since your class may have rules on this. But I'll give you some examples.
Sandy was a marketer, and she ran a business.
Jeoffrey made money off of selling dogs, and he bought a few of his own.
Old MacDonald had a farm, and he sold his livestock.
Lydia hated peas and carrots, but she loved broccoli.
Soccer is my favorite sport, so I tried out for a team.
Remember, the conjunction words form a compound sentence ALWAYS. A complex sentence has two or more parts and is not conjoined with a conjunction word. A simple sentence is one part and does not have any conjunction words.
Hope that helps! ;)
A friend tells you that he/she has been receiving anonymous bullying messages online. You suspect that certain people are guilty. What Would you do
Answers
Answer:
Tell someone whose older than you because some bullies are older than you
“The person I admire the most “ on some famous and good person write a paragraph ( urgent)
Answers
Explanation:
my role models are doctors, because for me they are like angels, because they use their own life to save that of others.
sacrificing oneself for someone is a heroic act for me.
I have always dreamed of becoming a doctor, especially the surgeon, perhaps because I have never borne the idea of seeing someone suffer and not knowing how to help.
- give it a second chance
- know how to set limits
yes because everyone deserves a second chance and we need to help people.
because it is not always possible to save a person, because the cure is the medicines and the resources discovered for now.
there is no particular doctor who is known for the operations he has done and maybe that's what makes this job special.
Answer:
Explanation:
I admire Sitting Bull because he never gave in to the oppressors who were trying to stifle his people. white people at the time were trying to turn native americans into, essencially , white people. but he never gave in, even to the day he was killed.
What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text of Churchhill's Speech ?
Answers
Some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text of Churchhill's Speech is option B. The tone in the text seems sad and defeatist, but in the audio version, Churchill speaks with determination.
Sir Winston Churchill's famous "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" speech, delivered on June 4, 1940, has been discussed, quoted, and analyzed many times. It is regarded as one of the most inspiring speeches of all time.
Critics have noted that while the text of Churchill's speech may convey a tone that appears sad and defeatist, the audio version presents a different impression. In the audio recording, Churchill's delivery is characterized by a sense of determination and resolve.
His voice carries conviction and an unwavering spirit, which contrasts with the potentially pessimistic tone that might be inferred from reading the text alone. This difference in tone between the audio and text versions is a significant observation made by critics.
Some critics, however, have pointed out a notable difference between the audio and text of the speech. The reason for this is the difference between what Churchill intended to say and what he actually said. The audio of the speech shows that Churchill often diverged from the script. For example, in the beginning, the prepared text read "We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind."
The text concluded with the statement "Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength." Churchill delivered a similar phrase, but it ended with "let us go forward together with our united strength to defend our homes and the world cause of freedom and peace." The audio recording indicates that Churchill was inclined to ad-lib his speeches to his liking and mood, emphasizing his rhetorical abilities.
In conclusion, the distinction between the audio and text of Churchill's "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" speech is a notable difference pointed out by some critics. They have suggested that Churchill often made changes to his prepared text to deliver a more impactful speech. Churchill was a master orator and his ad-libs contributed greatly to the overall success of his speeches. The correct answer is option b.
Know more about Sir Winston Churchill's here :
brainly.com/question/30375641
#SPJ8
The complete question is :
What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text of Churchill's speech?
A. Churchill uses sarcasm in the audio version, but sarcasm cannot be identified in the text version.
B. The tone in the text seems sad and defeatist, but in the audio version, Churchill speaks with determination.
C. The tone in the text seems inspirational, but in the audio version, Churchill sounds unemotional.
D. Churchill varies his speaking rate and volume to create emphasis in the audio version, but the sentences in the text version are lengthy and lack variety.
Millicent and Bev took a bus ahead of the rest of the girls; they had to stand up on the way to Lewiston Square. Bev seemed very cross about something. Finally she said, "You were talking with Herb Dalton at lunch today."
"No," Millicent said honestly.
"Well, I saw you smile at him. That's practically as bad as talking. Remember not to do it again."
Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?
Millicent feels confused by Bev.
Bev wants to embarrass Millicent.
Millicent is afraid of Bev.
Bev is jealous of Millicent.
Answers
From the passage, the best conclusion supported by the text is that Bev is jealous of Millicent. The passage describes a situation where Millicent and Bev took a bus ahead of the rest of the girls; they had to stand up on the way to Lewiston Square. Bev seemed very cross about something.
Finally, she accused Millicent of talking to Herb Dalton at lunch time. Millicent denied it, but Bev was still angry. Bev saw Millicent smile at Herb, and she said it was as bad as talking and that she shouldn't do it again. Therefore, it can be inferred that Bev is jealous of Millicent as the reason for her outburst is the smile Millicent gave Herb, suggesting that she wants Herb for herself.
The passage does not support the conclusion that Millicent feels confused by Bev. While Millicent may be surprised by Bev's outburst, there is nothing in the passage that suggests that she is confused by Bev. Additionally, the passage does not indicate that Bev is trying to embarrass Millicent.
Although she is angry with Millicent, her accusations are based on jealousy, not an attempt to humiliate her. Furthermore, there is no evidence that Millicent is afraid of Bev.
Know more about jealousy here :
brainly.com/question/32269434
#SPJ8
Explain the difference between the following two terms as the swipe interprets them? putting on airs and putting up a good front
Answers
The distinction between these two terms according to how the swiping reads them:
(putting on airs) To behave in a way that suggests one believes one is superior to others.(putting on a good show): to keep one's genuine emotions, ideas, etc. hidden.What is the origin of putting on a show?Its origins are in the French word air, which means "look, aspect, or bearing." Putting on airs means acting superior to others, whether that means being wealthier, better dressed, or more educated. A strategy to put on airs is to pretend that you are smarter than your teacher. It can potentially lead to serious trouble.
What does the term "swipe" mean?Swiping involves moving anything in a sweeping manner, much like when you run your credit card through with a reader. Swiping can also indicate "to steal," like when your younger sisters take your freshly baked cookies before they have a chance to cool.
To know more about sweeping visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29102142
#SPJ1
Quote a scene in each act, (act I, act II, act III, act IV, and act V) that are Dramatic Irony from Julius Caesar
Answers
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Identify the book you are reading. How has the main character in your book interacted with others? What might this interaction with others reveal about the story or the author's purpose for writing the book? Use examples from your reading to support your conclusion. Use proper grammar and spelling. (10 points)
I am reading Of Mice and Men.
Answers
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
I would love to help but i can't
It is hard to define which one is the main character in Of Mice and Men, as George and Lennie have protagonism in the story. But George comes first, as he represents the voice of reason of the duo, as the story unfolds.
This story takes place in California during the Great Depression (1930´s), and the two characters above are men without jobs or perspectives, looking for an opportunity to earn money and buy their own ranch.
George´s relationship with Lennie is different as they are close friends, trying to take care of each other. Also, they are both migrants, with all the implications this would bring at the time.
In the ranch where they find work, they meet other characters: their boss, the son of the boss, his wife, and other ranch hands.
These relations are shown in the book illustrating how unfair and unequal was this period, where racism and sexism and other prejudices were the regular concepts in society.
There is Candy, the aging one-handed ranchman who fears being useless and therefore fired. There is Crooks, the black man who is regularly isolated and threatened by other ranch men. There is Curley´s wife, whose dreams were crushed by marriage, and whose neck was broken by Lennie...
These examples remind that this is a drama with no happy-ending, and the realistic, sometimes offensive, way it was written has regarded it with criticism. But the development of the story has great merit in showing how hard those times were.
Dairy entry
Two ginius
Answers
In my diary entry, I want to share an interesting encounter I had with two geniuses. It was an extraordinary experience that left me in awe of their intelligence and creativity.
One day, while attending a conference on innovation and technology, I had the privilege of meeting two extraordinary individuals who could only be described as geniuses. The first genius, let's call him John, was a renowned physicist and mathematician. His contributions to the field of quantum mechanics had revolutionized our understanding of the universe. I was in complete awe as he explained complex theories with such clarity and simplicity.
The second genius, whom I'll refer to as Sarah, was a prodigious artist and inventor. Her creative mind seemed to know no bounds. She had invented groundbreaking technologies that seamlessly blended art and science. Her artwork was not only visually stunning but also carried deep philosophical meanings.
As I engaged in conversations with both John and Sarah, I was fascinated by their depth of knowledge and their ability to think outside the box. They challenged conventional wisdom and pushed the boundaries of human understanding. It was a humbling experience to be in the presence of such brilliance.
Throughout the conference, I had the opportunity to learn from their expertise and gain valuable insights. Their passion for their respective fields was infectious, and it motivated me to pursue my own intellectual endeavors with renewed vigor.
In conclusion, encountering these two geniuses was an unforgettable experience. Their intellect, creativity, and passion left a lasting impression on me. I will always cherish the lessons I learned from them and strive to nurture my own intellectual curiosity and innovative spirit.
For more such questions on intelligence, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/20339012
#SPJ8
19. Identify the statement that is a verifiable fact. (1 point) O Teenagers seem to prefer texting to talking when it comes to cell phone use. O Lifeguarding is one of the easiest and most lucrative summer jobs for teenagers. O The number of teenagers who own and use smart phones is increasing every year. O It's a good idea for most teens to avoid working while they are still attending high school.
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer: The number of teenagers who own and use smart phones is increasing every year.
Explanation: This fact can be verified with data. The others cannot.
Which statement best describes the purpose of the video “Larry and Vince”?
to persuade drivers and passengers to engage in safe behavior
to inform viewers that wearing a seat belt will not always prevent injury or death
to target a high-risk group to scare them into better behavior
to make people feel guilty and ashamed for not wearing seat belts
Answers
A. ) to persuade drivers and passengers to engage in safe behavior
It's Correct, Did This Help You? Give This Answer A Rating To Help More People Find It!
The statement that best describes the purpose of the video “Larry and Vince” is :
A) To persuade drivers and passengers to engage in safe behavior.
“Larry and Vince”The statement that best describes the purpose of the video “Larry and Vince” is to persuade drivers and passengers to engage in safe behavior.
It uses an educational approach to give information to the drivers to follow safety measures.
Thus, the correct answer is A.
Learn more about "Driving Behavior":
https://brainly.com/question/11968335?referrer=searchResults
what is nationalists of civil war? explain
Answers
Answer:
The people defending their country's traditional beliefs are nationalists in a civil war.
Explanation:
Nationalism is an idea and movement that promotes the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.
PLease HELP 99 points Tribute to the Dog
by George Graham Vest
George Graham Vest (1830¬–1904) was an attorney and U.S. Senator who was known as one of the greatest public speakers and debaters of his time.. This speech is Graham’s closing argument in a case in which he represented a man who was suing another man for killing his dog. Graham’s impactful statement helped to win the case.
Gentlemen of the Jury: The best friend a man has in the world may turn against him and become his enemy. His son or daughter that he has reared with loving care may prove ungrateful. Those who are nearest and dearest to us, those whom we trust with our happiness and our good name may become traitors to their faith. The money that a man has, he may lose. It flies away from him, perhaps when he needs it most. A man's reputation may be sacrificed in a moment of ill-considered action. The people who are prone to fall on their knees to do us honor when success is with us, may be the first to throw the stone of malice when failure settles its cloud upon our heads.
The one absolutely unselfish friend that man can have in this selfish world, the one that never deserts him, the one that never proves ungrateful or treacherous is his dog. A man's dog stands by him in prosperity and in poverty, in health and in sickness. He will sleep on the cold ground, where the wintry winds blow and the snow drives fiercely, if only he may be near his master's side. He will kiss the hand that has no food to offer. He will lick the wounds and sores that come in encounters with the roughness of the world. He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. When all other friends desert, he remains. When riches take wings, and reputation falls to pieces, he is as constant in his love as the sun in its journey through the heavens.
If fortune drives the master forth, an outcast in the world, friendless and homeless, the faithful dog asks no higher privilege than that of accompanying him, to guard him against danger, to fight against his enemies. And when the last scene of all comes, and death takes his master in its embrace and his body is laid away in the cold ground, no matter if all other friends pursue their way, there by the graveside will the noble dog be found, his head between his paws, his eyes sad, but open in alert watchfulness, faithful and true even in death...................................................................
Why do you think Graham’s statement was so “impactful?” Make sure to include evidence to support your opinion. Your answer should be one paragraph (6-8 sentences).
Answers
Answer:
Reword if needed
Graham's statement was impactful because he appealed to the emotions and values of the jury, emphasizing the unique loyalty and devotion that a dog shows to its owner. He contrasted the fickleness and potential disloyalty of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog. This argument likely resonated with the jury and tapped into their sense of empathy and compassion. Additionally, Graham's eloquent language and vivid imagery helped to paint a powerful picture of the bond between a man and his dog. Overall, Graham's statement was a compelling argument that successfully convinced the jury of the importance of a dog's life and the responsibility that humans have in protecting and respecting that life.
Answer:
George Graham Vest's statement in defense of a man's dog was impactful because it appealed to the emotions of the jurors and the public. By contrasting the fickleness of human relationships with the unwavering loyalty of a dog, he created a powerful and relatable image that resonated with the jury. The use of vivid and evocative language, such as describing the dog sleeping on the cold ground and guarding its master even in death, helped to further strengthen the emotional impact of the statement. Additionally, the statement was delivered at the end of the trial, which allowed it to leave a lasting impression on the jurors as they deliberated on the case. As a result, the statement helped to win the case and has since become a memorable and iconic piece of American legal history.
The Prince became an excellent
horse rider.
The Queen warns her husband not
to let her son touch the ground.
The Prince finds himself seized into a
new world when he touches the ground.
The Prince vanishes suddenly while
he is out for a ride in the woods.
Everyone takes great care and
precaution to care for the Prince.
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 2
12
Answers
The second, third, and fourth sentences give information for the second paragraph, while the first and fifth sentences give information for the fourth paragraph.
The prince's inability to touch the ground is explained in the second paragraph, which serves as an introduction.
However, the second line tells us that everyone was being very cautious, so the prince obeyed his mother's orders.
The issues with this request are discussed in the fourth paragraph.
This is because the prince's brilliance is revealed in this paragraph.
This sentence also depicts the instant he defies his mother's command, touches the ground, and vanishes.
Each paragraph's details help the reader understand certain aspects of the narrative and move the plot.
To know more about the prince click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28322374
#SPJ13
4. What are Macbeth's arguments to himself against killing Duncan?
-a. Macbeth is Duncan's kinsman and subject. Duncan is a good and popular king;
his death would bring sorrow to Scotland.
-b. There are too many witnesses in the castle. He could never get away with it.
-c. Macbeth doesn't really have the ambition to be king. He is doing this to please
his wife. He may be able to change her mind.
-d. If anyone found out he did it, they would just kill him. He is better off being a
Thane and being alive.
Answers
Macbeth's argument to himself against killing Duncan is Macbeth is Duncan's kinsman and subject. Duncan is a good and popular king; his death would bring sorrow to Scotland. Thus the correct option is A.
Macbeth considers killing Duncan in Act 1, Scene 7 of Shakespeare's play Macbeth. He does, however, make various excuses to himself to justify not carrying out the crime.
Duncan is his kin and subject, and he owes him protection and service. Duncan is referred to as a good and well-liked king, and his death would not only be a source of pain for Scotland, but it would also be a breach of the trust and duty he owes to his master.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about Macbeth, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11497424
#SPJ6
Select a poem you have read and explain how its form contributed to its meaning.
CAN BE ANY POEM
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
One example of a poem where form contributes to its meaning is "Sonnet 18" by William Shakespeare. This poem is a sonnet, a form of poetry that has strict rules and conventions, including 14 lines and a specific rhyme scheme.
In "Sonnet 18," the form contributes to the poem's meaning by emphasizing the speaker's attempt to immortalize the subject of the poem, who is described as "more lovely and more temperate" than a summer's day. The use of the sonnet form, which is often associated with love poetry and is traditionally used to express intense emotions, underscores the speaker's deep affection for the subject and the importance of the message he is trying to convey.
Additionally, the rhyme scheme of the sonnet - ABAB CDCD EFEF GG - helps to structure the poem and create a sense of symmetry and balance. This contributes to the poem's overall theme of the subject's enduring beauty and the speaker's attempt to preserve it through poetry.
Furthermore, the final couplet of the sonnet - "So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, / So long lives this, and this gives life to thee" - provides a memorable conclusion to the poem, emphasizing the power of art to transcend time and preserve beauty. The couplet's rhyme and meter help to emphasize its significance and make it stand out as a memorable conclusion to the poem.
In this way, the form of "Sonnet 18" contributes to its meaning by emphasizing the speaker's deep affection for the subject, creating a sense of symmetry and balance, and underscoring the power of poetry to preserve beauty and transcend time.