Answer: Tiber river
Explanation: Twisting in a generally southerly direction through a series of scenic gorges and broad valleys, the Tiber flows through the city of Rome and enters the Tyrrhenian Sea of the Mediterranean near Ostia Antica. Its major tributaries are the Chiascio, Nestore, Paglia, Nera, and Aniene.
Answer:
Tiber River
Explanation:
Tiber River is one of the river who flows through Rome.
Hope it helps!
#1 Most Soviet Union client states in Eastern Europe were ruled by?? #2 Which of these nations was the only one that remained occupied by the Soviet military?
#1 communist governments under Soviet control
# 2East Germany
ANSWERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Soviet Union, officially the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a transcontinental country that spanned much of Eurasia from 1922 to 1991.
What is the meaning of the Soviet Union?From 1922 to 1991, the Soviet Union, formally known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, occupied a large portion of Eurasia.
The 15 Soviet Socialist Republics that made up the Soviet Empire were: Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirgiziya (today Kyrgyzstan), Latvia, Lithuania, and Moldavia (now Moldova).
Russia, Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan were all members of the USSR at the time. Since Russia was merely one of the USSR's republics, the Soviet Union was also colloquially referred to as Russia and its inhabitants as Russians in the English-speaking world.
Learn more about the Soviet Union here:
https://brainly.com/question/10173240
#SPJ1
Whats the answer giving brainliest to first correct one
Answer: D
Explanation:
It looks as if D is then correct answer based on the definition of separation of powers. Not completely sure though
How did Constantinople's Church of Hagia Sophia demonstrate how the Byzantine Empire blended with the old Roman Empire? (5 points) Group of answer choices The church combined both Greek and Roman architecture, and became a melting pot where Eastern and Western cultures came together. The church housed a large library that included many books with information about traditions, customs, and laws from the Old Roman Empire. The church's leaders taught followers the laws and rules from both the Byzantine Empire and the old Roman Empire so that both cultures could survive. The church was built with many columns and arches, as well as a bell-shaped roof, which were signature elements of Old Roman architecture.
Answer:A
Explanation: The church combined both Greek and Roman architecture and became a melting pot where eastern and western came together
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The church combined both Greek and Roman architecture and became a melting pot where eastern and western came together
10. What property is unique to stem cells?
Answer:
The two defining characteristics of a stem cell are perpetual self-renewal and the ability to differentiate into a specialized adult cell type.
Which of the following statements are the most accurate? Choose two options. Some restrictions, or limits, may be placed on people’s freedoms. American citizens have the right to do whatever they choose. The rights guaranteed by the Constitution have never changed. The Constitution protects people’s individual rights and liberties.
Answer: The most accurate statements among the options provided are:
A. Some restrictions, or limits, may be placed on people's freedoms.
D. The Constitution protects people's individual rights and liberties.
Explanation: The first statement is accurate because although individuals have rights and freedoms, there are circumstances in which certain restrictions can be imposed for the greater good of society. For example, freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, but it does not protect speech that incites violence or poses a threat to public safety.
In addition, the fourth statement is accurate because the U.S. Constitution outlines the fundamental rights and liberties of American citizens. These rights include freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and the right to bear arms, among others. The Constitution serves as a safeguard to protect individuals from government infringement on these rights.
Germany disobeyeused its small fleet of 27 subs. On February 4, 1915 Germany declared area around British Isles a war zone. Unterseeboot (U-Boats) would operate freely. Germans warned Americans not to travel on British ships.
America
Britain
Global Law
international law
Germany's decision to disobey international law and use its fleet of 27 submarines, known as U-Boats, freely in the war zone around the British Isles directly impacted several entities, including America, Britain, and the concept of international law.
Germany's actions challenged the principles of international law and had significant consequences for the parties involved.
Germany's declaration of the war zone and the unrestricted submarine warfare posed a threat to American citizens and British ships. The warning issued by the Germans to Americans not to travel on British ships highlighted the potential danger and risk to American lives. This ultimately influenced America's stance and later entry into World War I.
Britain, being the targeted area for the unrestricted submarine warfare, faced increased risks and challenges in defending its maritime interests. The threat from German U-Boats impacted British shipping, trade, and military operations, leading to significant losses and casualties.
Moreover, Germany's disregard for international law and its aggressive actions in the war zone challenged the principles and norms established by the global community. International law aims to maintain peace, protect human rights, and regulate the conduct of nations during times of conflict. Germany's actions in violating international law undermined the global order and set a precedent for the violation of established rules and agreements.
In summary, Germany's disobedience of international law and the use of U-Boats in the war zone had far-reaching implications for America, Britain, and the concept of international law itself. It directly affected the safety of American citizens, disrupted British maritime operations, and posed a challenge to the established principles of global governance.
For more questions on U-Boats
https://brainly.com/question/30186660
#SPJ8
Do you think McCarthy really had a list of 205 members of the Communist Party working in our State Department? Why?
It is true that Senator Joseph McCarthy claimed to have a list of 205 members of the Communist Party working in the U.S. State Department, the validity of this claim is widely disputed. McCarthy made this assertion during the height of the Red Scare, a period of intense fear and suspicion of communism in the United States.
The senator capitalized on these fears to advance his political career, utilizing accusations and innuendo to target alleged communists without providing substantial evidence.
Historical evidence suggests that McCarthy's list was unreliable and exaggerated, as he frequently altered the number of supposed communists in his speeches. Moreover, many accused individuals were cleared of any wrongdoing after being subjected to investigations by the State Department and other agencies.
In conclusion, it is highly doubtful that McCarthy genuinely possessed a list of 205 confirmed communists working in the State Department. The senator's tactics were rooted in exploiting the fears of the public and promoting his political agenda, rather than presenting verifiable information.
For more question on communism
https://brainly.com/question/12173354
#SPJ11
a plan to improve school grounds for wildlife?
A plan to improve school grounds for wildlife involves creating a conducive environment that supports and promotes the presence of diverse plant and animal species.
Here is a summary of key steps that can be taken:
1. Native Plantings: Introduce native plants to the school grounds, including trees, shrubs, and wildflowers. These plants provide food and shelter for local wildlife, attract pollinators, and enhance biodiversity.
2. Habitat Creation: Designate areas for specific wildlife habitats such as butterfly gardens, birdhouses, bat boxes, and ponds. These features provide suitable nesting sites, roosting areas, and watering spots for various species.
3. Wildlife-Friendly Landscaping: Incorporate features like brush piles, rock piles, and fallen logs to create hiding places and cover for small mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. Incorporate diverse vegetation heights to provide varied habitats and encourage species diversity.
4. Water Sources: Install bird baths, small ponds, or rain gardens to provide water sources for wildlife. These can be designed to collect rainwater or utilize greywater to conserve resources.
5. Sustainable Practices: Implement eco-friendly practices such as reducing pesticide and herbicide use, composting, and water conservation measures. These practices create a healthier ecosystem and reduce harm to wildlife.
6. Educational Opportunities: Utilize the improved school grounds as a learning resource. Incorporate wildlife observation areas, nature trails, and interpretive signage to engage students in environmental education and foster a connection with nature.
By implementing these measures, schools can transform their grounds into vibrant, wildlife-friendly spaces. The plan not only benefits local fauna but also provides educational opportunities for students, fostering a sense of stewardship and appreciation for nature.
Know more about Wildlife here:
https://brainly.com/question/29547051
#SPJ8
Why do we study things that aren't true in history ?
1.If you were a citizen in 1796, which political party would you have identified
with and why? -Federalists or Democratic- Republicans? (use your graphic
organizer, too from class to help)
Answer:
REpublican
Explanation:
because back then demacrit wasnt a thing and segregation was
Answer:
i do not see the graphic organizer, but i would choose democratic- republicans.
In which scenario would most citizens accept some limitations to their individual rights?
O The president gives a speech to media reporters.
Soldiers are drafted and sent to serve overseas.
O Local officials are preparing for an election.
Public safety is considered to be at risk.
The scenario in which most citizens would likely accept some limitations to their individual rights is: D. Public safety is considered to be at risk.
What is Public safety ?Citizens are typically more willing to accept temporary restrictions on their individual rights in situations where there is a perceived threat to public safety, such as during emergency situations, natural disasters, or significant security concerns in order to uphold public order, protect lives, and ensure the general well-being of society.
This may entail actions like stepped-up surveillance, movement restrictions or temporary restrictions on some liberties. In such situations, the trade-off between individual rights and group safety is frequently taken into account.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about Public safety here:https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ1
Answer:
D - Public safety is consider to be at risk
Explanation:
When public safety is considered to be at risk, because of social contract most citizens would be willing to accept some limitations to their individual rights. This is because the preservation of public safety is seen as an important responsibility of the government, and in certain situations, temporary restrictions on individual rights may be necessary.
the main reason the United States government intervened in the great Railroad Strike of 1877
Answer: the main reason was that reason the United States government intervened in the Great Railroad Strike of 1877 that was leaving thousands of people without transportation, which meant that the US GDP was reduced hurting businesses of all kinds.
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/531509#readmore
Explanation:
I hoped this helped also i dont think i will need more explanation
Long term effects of independence movement in vietnam?
1. Political Impact: The Vietnam War, which began as a result of the communist North Vietnamese seeking reunification, reshaped the geopolitical landscape in Southeast Asia and worldwide. Vietnam's struggle for independence and subsequent unification has inspired other national liberation movements around the world.
2. Economic Impact: Following independence, Vietnam struggled with poverty, underdeveloped infrastructure, and a stagnant economy. The government initiated the Đổi Mới economic reforms in 1986, leading to an open, market-oriented system that spurred economic growth and improved living standards.
3. Social Impact: Women played a significant role in the independence movement in Vietnam, and their contributions helped reshape gender roles in Vietnamese society. The rise of nationalism, coupled with the spread of communism, led to changes in Vietnamese culture and societal norms.
4. International Relations: The Vietnam War altered the perception of the United States in the world, leading to mistrust of U.S. foreign policy. Vietnam's unification and independence sparked similar movements in neighboring countries and contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union, which supported North Vietnam during the war.
In conclusion, the independence movement in Vietnam had a profound and lasting impact on the country, its people, and the world. While Vietnam has achieved great strides and development post-independence and the Vietnam War, the events of that period have left a lasting mark on Vietnamese society and the world.
The long-term effects of the independence movement in Vietnam, culminating in the Vietnam War .
The eventual reunification of the country, have had significant impacts on Vietnam and the broader global context.National Independence and Reunification: The foremost consequence of the independence movement was the establishment of an independent Vietnam. The country was divided into North and South Vietnam following the Geneva Accords in 1954 but was reunified under communist rule in 1975. The successful independence struggle shaped Vietnam's national identity and sovereignty.Human Casualties and Destruction: The Vietnam War resulted in immense human suffering and loss of life. Millions of Vietnamese civilians and soldiers, as well as soldiers from various countries involved in the conflict, lost their lives. The war also caused extensive destruction to infrastructure and the environment, leaving a long-lasting impact on the country.Political Ideology: The victory of the communist-led forces in Vietnam contributed to the spread of socialist and communist ideologies in the region and had geopolitical implications during the Cold War. It influenced the dynamics of the Indochina region and the relationships between global powers.Economic Development and Reforms: Following reunification, Vietnam embarked on economic reforms known as Đổi Mới in the late 1980s. These reforms opened up the country to market-oriented policies, leading to significant economic growth and the emergence of Vietnam as a developing economy. Foreign direct investment and trade liberalization played crucial roles in Vietnam's economic transformation.Diplomatic Relations: The Vietnam War had far-reaching effects on international relations. It strained relations between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War and led to shifts in global alliances. It also influenced the perception of military interventions and raised questions about the use of force in international conflicts.The independence movement in Vietnam and its aftermath shaped the country's trajectory, leaving a lasting impact on its political, economic, and social dimensions. It also had broader consequences in terms of geopolitical dynamics, global alliances, and discussions surrounding war and intervention.For more such questions on Independence movement
https://brainly.com/question/12153093
#SPJ8
With the Civil Liberties Act of 1988Links to an external site., the United States government formally apologized and provided reparations to Japanese-Americans for their internment during World War II. That Act was partially motivated by a desire to "make more credible and sincere any declaration of concern by the United States over violations of human rights committed by other nations." Do you believe the US has put itself in a credible position from which to criticize the human rights practices of other nations? If yes, what crucial changes do you believe the US has made? If not, what is an example of a more recent decision or action by the US government that undermines credibility?
US has not put itself in a credible position from which to criticize the human rights practices of other nations US government's actions have undermined its credibility on the global stage. For example, the US has been criticized for its use of drone strikes, which have resulted in civilian casualties, and for its treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
The U.S. government's use of drone strikes in countries such as Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia has been heavily criticized for its impact on civilians. The lack of transparency in the U.S. drone program, including the targeting criteria and number of civilian casualties, has contributed to the erosion of its credibility on the global stage.
Another major issue is the treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. The detention center, established in 2002 to hold detainees captured in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, has been the subject of much controversy. Furthermore, the U.S. government's response to reports of human rights abuses by other countries has also been criticized for being selective and driven by political considerations.
To know more about human rights, click here
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ1
In your opinion, do you think the Bill of Rights is meant to apply in all situations, including times of war? Should it be legal to take away the rights of a small portion of the American public on a temporary basis if most Americans believe it will lead to greater security? Explain your opinion.
In my personal opinion, the Bill of Rights has every right to take away portions of America. When it comes to times of War expressly. This is because sacrifices have to be made for a brighter tomorrow. If that means temporarily taking away some rights of small portions of American public, so be it. "We the People" fight for the Greater Good.
PLEASE HURRY!! ILL GIVE LIKE 25 POINTS!! how did the believes of the samurai affect Japanese soldiers in world war 2?
Answer:
they would refuse to surrender and would be inclined to commit the self kill if they were going to be captured, and they would fight to the last man.
Explanation:
Read Alexander Falconbridge's Account of the Slave Trade and answer one of the questions in a 4-5 sentence paragraph.
According to Falconbridge are African males and females treated differently? If so, how it support or disprove sources we have studied so far?
Highlight two different types of rebellion from this account. Does it support or disprove sources we have studied so far?
How would this account of the African experience be an important tool for the abolition of the Slave Trade?
According to Falconbridge's account of the Slave Trade, men were indeed treated differently than the women.
How were women treated?As a diversion, women were given beads and jewelry. Workers were permitted to have se.xual relations with women. Women were housed in flats with fewer chains.
On the other hand, Men were handcuffed and herded into a single room. Women were not handcuffed and were kept in a separate room. The lads were not cuffed and were in a different room. All slaves were confined to separate cabins below deck.
Who is Falconbridge?Alexander Falconbridge was a British surgeon who participated in four slave ship journeys between 1782 and 1787.
He eventually became an abolitionist and wrote An Account of the Slave Trade on the Coast of Africa in 1788.
Learn more about Falconbridge:
https://brainly.com/question/28405774
#SPJ1
Which is an example of a primary source?
an encyclopedia article about a subject
a diary entry from a witness to an event
a textbook chapter about an important topic
a government report summarizing extensive research
Answer:
Option B, a diary entry from a witness to an event is an example of a primary source
Explanation:
A primary source of study is basically the source of information creating while conducting the study. This could be a diary, a manuscript, a recording or an interview or discussion etc.
Basically primary source of information is not available on public platforms. It is collected from site which is the study area
Hence, option B is correct
Answer:
B
Explanation:
In what ways would the decision of Brown v. Board of Education affect the citizens of Georgia? In what ways would the decision affect the access that citizens in Georgia have? Use evidence from the four sources above to answer the question. Write at least three complete sentences.
The decision of Brown v. Board of Education would have significant implications for the citizens of Georgia, particularly in terms of racial desegregation in schools and access to education.
The ruling declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, challenging the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the Plessy v. Ferguson case. This meant that schools in Georgia and other states would be required to integrate and provide equal educational opportunities for all students, regardless of their race.
The decision would directly impact the access that citizens in Georgia have to education by dismantling the segregated school system and promoting integration. African American students would gain access to previously all-white schools, which would provide them with better resources, facilities, and educational opportunities. This would contribute to a more equitable and inclusive educational environment in the state.
Furthermore, the decision would also bring about social and cultural changes, as students from different racial backgrounds would have the opportunity to learn together, fostering understanding, tolerance, and breaking down racial barriers.
Overall, the decision of Brown v. Board of Education in Georgia would lead to desegregation in schools, provide equal access to education for all citizens, and contribute to promoting equality and integration in society.
Know more about Brown v. Board of Education here:
https://brainly.com/question/14849199
#SPJ8
BAK ABAK ABAK A BAKA DKS DIENKS SISNSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUHD8UENDEUH8JEDUNDIDJ8EUUINKHYEITGYBEYEDY6GE87DHIUDNEDGDHUKNDUYDEYDUHN
Bycatch is a serious issue that affects the health of aquatic ecosystems, causes the decline of populations of marine species, and impacts the commercial fishing industry. Explain each of these impacts and suggest a solution that would reduce the losses caused by bycatch. Use details to support your answer.
Answer:
DFTHFTYFYUFFFFFFYUFYUFYUFYUFFUYFYUUFTUTDDRT
Explanation:
Why can bycatch be a problem? Unwanted catch is an issue both ecologically and economically. Animals that are discarded often die and cannot reproduce, impacting marine ecosystems. Bycatch can slow the rebuilding of overfished stocks, and place protected species such as whales and sea turtles at further risk.
How did the United States contribute to the Allied victory? Check all that apply.
By providing large numbers of reinforcements
By supporting the last major allied offensive
By boosting the morale of Allied troops
United States contributed to the Allied victory during WWII by providing large numbers of reinforcements. The Option A is correct.
How did United States contributed to Allied victory?U.S. was able to contribute to the victory because of its technological and industrial research which started as a result of lessons learn from WWI. Its researches and military production and aid helps the victory of allies in Europe.
By 1944, the country led the world in arms production and making more than enough to fill its military needs. At the same time, it was providing its allies in Great Britain and the Soviet Union with critically needed supplies.
Read more about Allied victory
brainly.com/question/25957894
#SPJ1
Answer: its all 3 choices
By providing large numbers of reinforcements
By supporting the last major allied offensive
By boosting the morale of Allied troops
Explanation:
In a parliamentary system of government, the head of government, the Head of government legislation found,while the President has Executive function. Yes or No.
Answer: No. In a parliamentary system of government, the head of government is typically the Prime Minister or the equivalent title, who is responsible for the day-to-day administration and legislation. The President, in a parliamentary system, usually holds a ceremonial or representative role and does not have executive functions. The executive power lies with the head of government, not the President.
Explanation:)
15. A _______ government was to blame for the economic and other problems in the United States after the Revolution
Answer:
Confederation
Explanation:
2 Points
Which of these is required for specialization to take place?
O A. A division of labor
Q B. Labor unions
C. Globalization
D. International trade
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. A Division of Labor is your correct answer.
Can I Get Brainliest? Thx Peace...
Answer:
a division of labor
Explanation:
Just took the quiz
What was the result of the Great Depression, and how did the United States recover? How did we prevent it from happening again?
Answer:
The result of the great depression was a total collaspe of the banking industry of the country. People were out of work, lost their homes, and had very little to eat.
Explanation: FDR established work programs for the government, and regulated the stock market. when people went back to work they were able to purchase things and the economy went back to normal.
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
must never, even with reasonable cause, carry out a stop and frisk.
must always have a warrant to seize evidence, even if it is in plain view.
may never violate the Fourth Amendment protections concerning searches and seizures.
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court established the "stop and frisk" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. The Court ruled that if an officer has reasonable suspicion that a person is engaged in criminal activity and poses a threat to the safety of the officer or others, they may conduct a limited search for weapons.Horton v. California further clarified the scope of warrantless searches. The Court held that if the police are lawfully present in a location and evidence is in plain view, they may seize it without a warrant. This is known as the "plain view doctrine."These decisions recognize that in certain circumstances, law enforcement officers may need to act quickly to ensure public safety or prevent the destruction of evidence. These exceptions are narrowly defined and subject to scrutiny to ensure that they do not violate individuals' Fourth Amendment rights.The correct option is: may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
For more such questions on Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ8
Which chamber will support your
compromise the most? Would they both agree?
Explain your answer
Due to its longer terms, smaller size, and statewide constituents, which have resulted in a more collegial and less politicized culture, the Senate is often regarded as both a more deliberative than House of Representatives.
What is Senate ?The House of Representatives is the lower chamber of the United States Congress, and the United States Senate is its upper chamber.
The Senate is the only body with the authority to give advice and consent to treaty ratification and to approve presidential appointments that call for it. However, there are two exceptions to this rule: any treaty involving international trade and the approval of Vice President nominees by the House.
To learn more about Senate
https://brainly.com/question/26503288
#SPJ1
What does Jackson claim will likely happen to Native Americans if they are not relocated?
A: They will be wiped out
B: They will refuse to fit in with white Americans
C: They will adapt to the white settlers' way of life
D: They will fight for their land
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Brainliest please
According to Brutus, no. 1, why was it so important that the question of whether to adopt the Constitution be decided correctly?
Answer:
The public is selecting whether to approve a government that will protect their liberties or could subvert them. Ratification is the most important question because it determines the well being for the future generations
Explanation:
Hi you're welcome :)
which black civil rights leader was chosen by the pullman porters to lead them in a fight to form a union
Answer:
Philip Randolph
Explanation:
Randolph lead a 10 year drive organization to organize the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters and served as the organization's first president.