Answers
I'm a little bit confused between a and b..
but I found this maybe it will help u..
Explanation:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within the home.
The District of Columbia argued that the opening phrase of the amendment, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,” known as the prefatory clause, limited the “right of the people” to have weapons only in connection with militia service. The city also pointed out that the law did not ban all guns, and that it was a reasonable way to prevent crime.
The Court agreed with Heller and overturned the District’s law. The Court reasoned that the prefatory clause gave one reason for the Second Amendment, but it did not limit the right listed in the operative clause—the second part of the amendment—to own weapons only for militia service. “The prefatory clause does not suggest that preserving the militia was the only reason Americans valued the ancient right…” The Court also reasoned that elsewhere in the Constitution, such as the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, the phrase “the right of the people” is used only to refer to individual rights—that is, rights held by people as individuals. It is this phrasing that is used in the operative clause of the Second Amendment.
Finally, the Court reasoned that the right to own weapons for self-defense was an “inherent” (in-born) right of all people. “It has always been widely understood that the Second Amendment, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codified a pre-existing right. The very text of the Second Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and declares only that it ‘shall not be infringed.’”
Therefore, the answer is A.
Related Questions
Who is the Best Law Firm in Lahore?
Answers
Answer:
Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.
Discuss 3 ways on how to get involved in human rights campaign
Answers
Answer:
There are several ways to get involved in human rights campaigns, including:
- Joining a human rights organization: There are many organizations that work on human rights issues, such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the American Civil Liberties Union. Joining one of these organizations can give you access to resources, events, and opportunities to take action on human rights issues.
- Educating yourself and others: Learning about human rights issues and sharing that knowledge with others can be a powerful way to raise awareness and promote change. You can read books, watch documentaries, attend lectures, and engage in discussions with others to deepen your understanding of human rights issues.
- Taking action: There are many ways to take action on human rights issues, depending on your interests and skills. You can write letters to elected officials, participate in protests and rallies, donate money to organizations working on human rights issues, and use social media to raise awareness and mobilize others.
which of the following is true according to the diagram? responses the senate minority leader is as powerful as the senate majority whip. the senate minority leader is as powerful as the senate majority whip. the speaker of the house, in coordination with the house majority leader, appoints the house minority leader. the speaker of the house, in coordination with the house majority leader, appoints the house minority leader. unlike the house of representatives, the senate does not recognize political parties. unlike the house of representatives, the senate does not recognize political parties. both chambers make use of a system of majority and minority whips.
Answers
The given statement both chambers make use of a system of majority and minority whips is true because The job of the whip is to count votes and ensure that party members are in attendance and voting in line with party objectives.
A whip is a political position in the United States government that is primarily concerned with managing and controlling the behavior of legislators in the party or caucus to which they belong.
They assist in the coordination of party policy and legislative goals, ensuring that the majority party passes laws that align with the party's objectives. The Senate Majority Whip and Minority Whip, as well as the House Majority Whip and Minority Whip, are essential positions in both chambers.
They are in charge of maintaining party unity and discipline by ensuring that all party members support their caucus or party on crucial votes. The whip's position is significant since they can convey crucial details to their party leadership and persuade individual members to vote in a particular way.
Learn more about minority and majority whip https://brainly.com/question/13467401
#SPJ11
22. What type of business often pays similar taxes as that of a sole proprietorship or a partnership,
depending on whether there are one or more members?
O domestic corporation
O limited liability company
O nonprofit corporation
O professional corporation
11
13
23. With a life estate, property may revert back to another party after the owner's death and not to
the
(1
15
O easement user.
O
government.
O landlord.
O owner's heirs.
16
3
9
11
24. Before judicial ruling for an agency takes place, administrative roles should be ripe and pertain (1
to the involved
O judges.
O circuit courts.
O beneficiaries.
O petitioners.
13
15
17
19
25. Which is true about criminal law? (1 point)
O It provides the injured party with a remedy.
O It involves wrongs against individuals.
O It tries to return the injured party to the same position before the injury.
O It involves wrongs against society.
21
23
Answers
22. The type of business that often pays similar taxes like a sole proprietorship or a partnership, depending on whether there are one or more members is B. limited liability company.
23. With a life estate, property may revert to another party after the owner's death and not to the A. easement user.
24. Before judicial ruling for an agency takes place, administrative roles should be ripe and pertain to the involved C. beneficiaries.
25. The truth about criminal law is D. It involves wrongs against society.
Learn more about types of business at https://brainly.com/question/11984342
Question 6 of 10
A judge may be asked to decide that a Complaint has no legal remedy under
the law by submitting a
A. Motion for Nuisance Suits
B. Motion to Suppress the Complaint
C. Motion for Summary Judgment
D. Motion to Dismiss
SUBMIT
Answers
Answer:
D. motion to dismiss
Explanation:
You're deprived of your typical lab equipment but need to detect
hydrocarbons in evidence. Which of the following tools would you
most likely be able to use to release traces of hydrocarbons?
O A cigarette lighter
O A refrigerator
O A fruit-drying machine
O A faucet
Answers
Answer:
Lighter is correct
Explanation:
it contains butane
to provide legal advice to the public is to engage in
Answers
To provide legal advice to the public is to engage in Nonlawyer legal service providers' content that they are not engaging in UPL because they are providing legal information, not advice.
Lawyer As a popular matter, the most effective legal professionals might also provide real prison recommendations, whereas any non-lawyer can also recite legal statistics. furthermore, it's far typically unlawful for a non-lawyer or unlicensed attorney to provide a legal recommendation or in any other case represent someone aside from themself in court. that have an effect on the rights of someone, representing someone in a court docket of law or in a legal rely on, negotiating the rights of a customer.
The phrases legal professional and lawyer are frequently used interchangeably. for that reason, people inside and outside of the felony discipline often ask an attorney and a lawyer an equal thing. In colloquial speech, the specific requirements vital to be taken into consideration a lawyer vs lawyer are not constantly considered. felony recommendation applies the regulation, along with statute and case regulation and felony principles to a selected scenario.
Learn more about Legal advice here:-https://brainly.com/question/17494866
#SPJ9
darcy's law group of answer choices is used to theoretically model the direction of groundwater flow in an aquifer. is a method to determine the degree of water saturation at any specified depth. states that discharge equals the hydraulic conductivity coefficient multiplied by the hydraulic gradient multiplied by the area involved. cannot be used to decide practical issues, such as whether sufficient groundwater exists to supply a city's needs.
Answers
According to the fluid mechanics theory known as Darcy's Law, the hydraulic gradient and the permeability of a porous media determine how quickly a fluid flows through them.
The direction of groundwater flow in an aquifer can be theoretically predicted using this rule, but it cannot be used to resolve practical problems, such as whether there is enough groundwater to meet a city's needs. As the amount of water that can be kept in the aquifer is related to its permeability, it is also a method to assess the level of water saturation at any given depth.
Darcy's Law can be expressed as follows in its simplest form:
Q = -KA∇H
where A is the area of flow (m2), Q is the volumetric discharge rate (m3/s), K is the hydraulic conductivity (m/s), and ∇H is the hydraulic gradient (m/m).
To learn more about Darcy's Law please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/27005987
#SPJ4
Rare earth is not soil, but a very important mineral resources. The exploitation of rare earth will bring great pollution to the ecological environment.
Excessive mining of rare earth causes ecological damage. Rare earth mining is extremely destructive to the environment and vegetation. With the massive felling of surrounding trees and the stripping of topsoil, the mountain vegetation wherever it goes will suffer irreparable damage. As the content of rare earth minerals is very low, so the exploitation of land and vegetation damage, resulting in soil erosion is very serious. If it encounters rain erosion, it is easy to cause pollution of water resources. The extraction and processing projects of rare earth cause pollution to the environment. In the process of the extraction and processing of rare earth, the discharge of harmful waste water, waste residue and waste gas is very serious, including a large amount of ammonia, nitrogen, sulfate, chloride ions and radioactive substances in the waste water. Moreover, these pollution will remain underground for a long time. These heavy metals or harmful elements will enter rivers or underground water bodies under the action of rainwater washing. Once the underground water resources are polluted, the health and ecological environment of residents will be seriously affected, and the consequences will be unimaginable.
In fact, rare earth mining is mainly a matter of environmental protection and cost, and the United States should not care so much now. Back in 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives proposed the National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2013, which aims to restore the ability of the United States to exploit strategic minerals for the sake of national security and economic recovery. Most Democrats say the bill would accelerate environmental damage, and Obama administration officials have opposed it. In 2015, the only mine in the United States, Mountain Pass in California, went bankrupt over environmental costs. In 2017, Trump signed Executive Order 13817, a Federal Strategy to Ensure the Safe and Reliable Supply of Critical Minerals, calling for a rare earth strategy. In recent years, the US has made frequent moves in the field of rare earth. The US Department of Commerce has issued 61 emergency measures aimed at promoting self-sufficiency in key mineral resources. In 2020, three congressmen successively produced the "2020 Domestic Rare Earth Bill" and "Reducing Foreign Dependence on Rare Earth". Mountain Pass also started production again in 2018, despite the green light from the United States.
Recently, Senator Cotton, a Republican, and Senator Kelly, a Democrat, submitted a rare earth bill to Congress. The bill aims to legislate for the PENTAGON to wean itself off China's reliance on rare earths within four years. To break China's monopoly on rare earth resources and wean itself off dependence on China, the United States plans to invest heavily in the rare earth industry. The US move adds to the financial burden on the US. Under the Trump administration, the US government linked the supply of rare earths to national security, joining forces with Australia and other countries to demand the exclusion of Chinese rare earth products from the defense sector. However, the labor and environmental costs of rare earth mining in western countries are so high that it is impossible for the mined minerals to be competitive in the market. Just for an imaginary threat, the PENTAGON would have to pay a hefty subsidy, further burdening America's stubbornly high fiscal deficit.
Lynas, an Australian rare-earth company backed by the United States, has also been plagued by problems. When Linus built a production facility in Malaysia in 2012, local residents protested over concerns that the separation process could create a large amount of contaminated residue that could wreak havoc on the soil and water. The Malaysian government said the permit would not be renewed if Linus failed to meet environmental monitoring targets for the waste it had already produced. Protests were held during the operation of Linus as many citizens were dissatisfied with the introduction of Linus by the government. The issue of environmental pollution in Lynas only came to the surface after Mahathir took office as prime minister and began to deal with the legacy of the previous government one by one. In 2018, the Malaysian government set up an investigation team to investigate the environment around the plant and found that underground water samples contained excessive levels of nickel and chromium.
The Biden administration has ignored the financial burden and environmental concerns of rare earth mining and processing in its effort to restart the industry to reduce dependence on China.
Answers
The central idea of this text is that although rare earth minerals are crucial to human existence, the process of mining and extracting them is taking a toll on the ecological vicinity of the earth.
What is a central idea?The central idea of a discourse is the overarching and dominant thought that reverberates all through the text.
When one is done reading a text, the thought that lingers, the impression that one is left with is what is called the central idea.
The text goes on to buttress the need for mining rare earth materials by exploring the politics behind it.
The author in connection with this mentions that Biden's administration is more concerned with economic independence and political rivalry than the real problems posed by the mining of the rare earth minerals.
Learn more about rate earth minerals at:
https://brainly.com/question/8677298
#SPJ1
the last president to come directly out of the house of representatives was _____.
Answers
The last president to come directly out of the House of Representatives was James A. Garfield, who was elected as the 20th President of the United States in 1880. Garfield served in the House from 1863 to 1880 and was known for his eloquent speeches and passionate advocacy for civil rights and education reform.
Garfield's rise to the presidency was somewhat unexpected. He was a compromise candidate at the Republican National Convention, chosen after several rounds of balloting when the front-runners failed to gain enough support. Despite his lack of national political experience, Garfield went on to win the general election, defeating Democrat Winfield Scott Hancock.Unfortunately, Garfield's presidency was short-lived. He was shot by a would-be assassin just four months into his term and died of his injuries 11 weeks later. Garfield's death sparked widespread mourning and led to calls for increased civil service reform, which eventually resulted in the passage of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act in 1883.
Read more about National Convention here:https://brainly.com/question/28096856
#SPJ11
US consumers have paid ___ prices for goods at many stores such as Wal-Mart due to globalization.
Answers
Because of globalization, many companies, including Walmart, have reduced their prices for US customers. Manufacturing costs are generally decreasing as a result of globalization. This implies that businesses can set lower prices for their products.
The average cost of commodities is an important factor that improves quality of life. Furthermore, because of globalization consumers have greater access to a broader range of goods. Giving people access to a more varied and balanced diet has the potential to improve their health in some cases, but it has also been linked to diabetes and an increase in junk food consumption.
As a result of globalization, businesses can take advantage of lower labor costs in developing countries while also employing the expertise and knowledge of more developed economies.
To learn more about globalization, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15283031
#SPJ4
The international tax code affects the United States economy. In this discussion, you will comment onthe complexity of the tax code and how the international tax code interacts with the U.S. tax code.It was mentioned in our textbook that Pam Olson, former Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy, wasquoted as saying, "It is difficult to predict the future of an economy in which it takes more brains tofigure out the tax on our income than it does to earn it." ReadTestimony of Pamela Olson Before theSenate Committee on Finance on International Tax Policy and Competitiveness, as well as the resourcearticleWhat Are the Consequences of the New US International Tax System?, and comment on yourexperience with the complexity of the tax code by addressing the following questions:Do you think that the new tax act helped or further complicated the tax code?
Answers
The international tax code tends to affects the United States economy. So, the new law also confers the enormous tax benefits which were on some industries but not others.
The international tax code which is seen to be administered by U.S. and the foreign governments can thus dramatically affect the business decision making, retention, job creation and plant location, also the competitiveness, and the long-term health of the U.S. economy.
However, the objective of the international taxation is in order to manage the cross overs which are considered of the national tax systems when they are said to be confronted with international transactions.
To learn more about taxation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1980107
#SPJ4
50 POINTS What is rehabilitation? Do you think this is an appropriate goal for the justice system? Why or why not?
Answers
Answer:
One of the often forgotten objectives of the criminal justice system, rehabilitation aims to transform the offender into becoming a valuable member of the general population once he serves his time in prison. Here, they are taught skills that will render them useful in general society. There is evidence that rehabilitation (including within prison) reduces crime and can be cost-effective.
(please give brainliest)
Question 1
__ is important to law enforcement, because police officers have the right to deprive people of their liberty.
A unethical behavior
B Ethical behavior
Misuse of force
D) Use of force
Answers
True or false. To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and sign ig.
Answers
To complete a notarization, it is enough for a notary public to place a stamp on the record and signature ----- False
When something needs to be notarized, what does it mean?A notary public, a licensed public officer who acts as an impartial witness to the signing of documents and determines the authenticity of the signatures, certifies a notarized letter or document. To verify the signature on your letter or legal document, you need the seal and signature of a notary public.
What is a certificate from a notary?A notarial certificate is a written statement that the notary public signs and seals to confirm the facts of a notarial act. A notary's most common duties as a notary include administering oaths and accepting acknowledgments.
What is a notarized stamp?When a document has a notary seal on it, the court knows that the signatures are genuine and not fake because the notary seal is there to verify this.
Learn more about notarizing document :
brainly.com/question/14477099
#SPJ1
Show an adequate demonstration of the relationship between
uncertainties and
risk against time on a graph.
Answers
In risk analysis, it is essential to assess potential losses and the likelihood of their occurrence. Uncertainties are quantified as probabilities and represented by a risk curve, which depicts the relationship between risk and time. The shape of the risk curve varies based on the level of risk and the duration under consideration.
Typically, the curve starts at a low probability, gradually increases to a peak representing the maximum probable risk level, and then declines.
This peak serves as a reference point for risk assessment.
Risk curves are constructed using historical data on past hazards, such as natural disasters or accidents, along with the associated probabilities.
In summary, uncertainties and risks are interconnected, and a risk curve effectively portrays the temporal evolution of risk.
Read more about uncertainties
https://brainly.com/question/14650744
#SPJ11
Who conducts the performance evaluation on the battalion chief?
captain
deputy chief
lieutenant
paramedic
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
this is stupid
Answer:
Lieutenant
edge 2021
Explanation:
Select all of the positive features of bureaucracy according to Max Weber.
- impersonality
- formal rules and procedures
- merit-based careers
- specialists for complex tasks
- clear hierarchy
Answers
All of the above mentioned
What are the benefits of collective bargaining agreements?
Answers
The benefits of collective bargaining agreements include better wages, improved benefits, job security, improved working conditions and a voice in the workplace.
Collective bargaining agreements are contracts between an employer and a union that outline the terms and conditions of employment for workers represented by the union. The benefits are explained as follows:
1. Better wages: Through collective bargaining agreements, workers are able to negotiate for higher wages, ensuring that they are fairly compensated for their work.
2. Improved benefits: Collective bargaining agreements often include provisions for health insurance, retirement plans, and other benefits, which can be more generous than those offered to non-union workers.
3. Job security: Collective bargaining agreements typically include provisions that protect workers from layoffs or unfair dismissal, providing greater job security.
4. Improved working conditions: Collective bargaining agreements can include provisions for safe and healthy working conditions, ensuring that workers are not exposed to unnecessary risks on the job.
5. A voice in the workplace: Through collective bargaining agreements, workers have a voice in decisions that affect their jobs and their working conditions, giving them greater control over their work environment.
Overall, collective bargaining agreements provide a range of benefits for workers, including better wages, improved benefits, greater job security, and a voice in the workplace.
To know more about collective bargaining agreements, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/27032996#
#SPJ11
Name at least 3 characteristics of Asian street gangs
Answers
Answer:
Activities include intimidation and extortion, vandalism, theft, assault, swarming, drug trafficking, stabbings, shootings and sometimes murder.
.Members may wear certain kinds of colors of clothing in very specific ways and/or use special hand signals, nicknames or symbols.
Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of weeks after he gets released from the hospital, Jay receives a bill from the hospital for $10,000 for his medical care. If this went to court, the judge would probably describe this situation as:________.
a. a bilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
b. a unilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.
c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
d. no contract at all. Jay should not have to pay anything.
Answers
Answer: c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.
Explanation:
An Implied contracts is usually between physician and a patient this contracts do not state the course of action or payment at the start or inception of the service. Example, a medical examination usually takes place the moment a patient's request for it, this tests are usually either at the patients home or at the medical facility where the doctor practices. After the examination a course of action or payment is decided. Same applies to Jay after been treated and discharged from the hospital a course of action or payment may be made.
What do you understand by the terms ‘Law’ in general and ‘Business law in particular’?
Answers
Answer:
Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.
Explanation:
Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.
Provide TWO (2) examples or situations that
prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less
stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing
country (e.g., laws r
Answers
TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.
Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.
Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.
It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.
Learn more about tax loopholes
https://brainly.com/question/7227568
#SPJ11
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answers
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
2. In a multicultural society as South Africa misunderstandings are bound to happen. Provide us with an example where you had an encounter with someone from a different culture, race or language group where there was a misunderstanding experienced when greeting or communicating? Elaborate. (10)
Answers
Suppose I am a South African who grew up in a predominantly English-speaking community and I meet someone from a different culture, race, or language group who speaks a different language. Let's say I meet a person from the Xhosa-speaking community and I try to greet them in English, saying "Hello, how are you?" The person responds in Xhosa, but I don't understand the language and assume they didn't understand my greeting. I repeat my greeting in English, but the person responds again in Xhosa. Frustrated, I assume that the person is being rude or unresponsive, when in fact they are trying to communicate with me in their own language.
In this scenario, the misunderstanding arises from a lack of cultural and linguistic awareness. As South Africa is a multicultural society with many different languages and cultural practices, it is important to be aware of and respectful of the diversity of the people we encounter. Taking the time to learn about the different languages and cultures in South Africa can help prevent misunderstandings and promote mutual understanding and respect.
Should bullies be legally responsible for their actions?
Answers
QUESTION 42
Ethical issues facing prosecutors are the same ethical issues as those facing defense attorneys
A)True
B)False
Answers
because they are both fighting the same case
I hope this is helpful!
~your friendly freshman
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
Answers
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
Answers
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
A (5 years old) cannot enter into civil relations by himself or herself because:
Select one:
a. A has no legal personality.
b. A has no legal capacity.
c. A has limited legal capacity.
d. A has inadequate legal capacity.
Answers
Answer:
has no legal personality