Answers
Attorneys who assist victims of identity theft can use IdentityTheft.gov, a service of the FTC. The website offers victims a specific recovery plan detailing each action. Additionally, it provides pre-filled letters and forms that may be sent to businesses, bill collectors, and credit bureaus.
The FTC acts as a clearinghouse for identity theft reports, a component of the FTC's Consumer Sentinel report database, even though it lacks criminal jurisdiction. This helps the criminal investigation and prosecution of identity theft.
The Federal Trade Commission aims to advance competition, safeguard consumers, and impart knowledge. You can contact 1-877-FTC-HELP to report fraud and find out more about consumer issues (382-4357).
To learn more on FTC tap here:
brainly.com/question/24304308
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Given the announcement for creating a public defender office at the 1893 World’s Fair and the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, why do you think it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America?
The long history of dispute in America between federal power and state power caused such delay.
Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee.
Florida is an important state for being a model for abiding by the law.
It took a lawyer who could point out the flaws in an eyewitness to convince the nation of individuals’ rights.
Answers
It can be inferred that it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America because: "
Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee." (Option B)
What is the Sixth Amendment right?In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial before a completely unbiased jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be notified of the character and cause of the accusation;
to be challenged with the witnesses against him; to have a mandatory procedure for gathering evidence in his favor; and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
In governance and law, an amendment is an addition or change made to a constitution, legislation, or legislative bill or resolution.
Modifications can be made to existing constitutions and statutes, as well as to legislation during their transit through a legislature.
Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ1
HELP ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER FOR ME AND I WILL MARK YOU BRANLIEST WHOEVER ANSWER FIRST AND CORRECT
Answers
Answer:
a member of congress
Explanation:
I think im not 100% though
Sociologist C. Wright Mills emphasized that social structure lies at the root of private troubles, and that what people may define as private troubles may be more accurately described as public issues, if these problems affect large number. What personal troubles have you encountered that may also be public issues?
Answers
Answer:
One personal trouble I have encountered that may also be a public issue is the increasing cost of healthcare. Even with health insurance, many people are struggling to pay for necessary medical treatments due to rising costs. This issue affects a large number of people, making it a public issue.
Explanation:
We are going to cancel the regional sales meeting …………. the big snowstorm has shut down airports and all major airlines are grounded.
A. although
B. despite
C. unless
D. since
Answers
The word that best completes the underlined word from the given sentence is:
D. SinceFrom the given question, we can see that an action is about to be taken, but there is a problem that cannot allow them to proceed. This problem is a bug snowstorm which has stopped all vehicular and air travel.
As a result of this, we need to use a word that highlights this problem and shows the reason why the regional sales meeting cannot proceed as planned.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D because the transitional word "Since" is used to show why the meeting could not take place.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/12644119
Considering critiques of human rights by cultural relativists and feminists, do you
believe human rights are universal? What critiques do you find most convincing
and why? Do you think universalists can respond adequately to these critiques?
Also, consider the disjuncture between human rights theory and practice, what
does this disjuncture means (if anything) for universalists?
Answers
Human Rights are universally declared to be equal for every person in any part of the world. This was stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
What is UDHR ?UDHR was adopted by UN General Assembly as the first legal document which was based on fundamental human rights being universal.UDHR's 30th article talks about the principle and building blocks of every current and future generation of human rights conventions, treaties, and other legal documents.This consists of basically reports such as:International covenant of civil and political International Bill of RightsThe principle of Universality is concerned with International Human Rights Duties. This means every human is equally treated under the eyes of the law.
LEARN MORE ABOUT Human rights :
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ9
Which is an example of discretionary spending?
A. Education
B. Social security
C.medicare
D.federal taxes
Answers
Which action is part of the naturalization process?
O A. Buying property in the United States
O B. Getting accepted to college
C. Serving in the U.S. military
O D. Passing a background check
Answers
Answer: b
Explanation: i pick b because accepted to college is better
This theory of punishment is based on the idea that a citizen committed a moral wrong by breaking the law and therefore deserves to be punished as a result. * O Retribution O Utilitarianism O Restorative Justice O Mandatory minimums
Answers
In Rationales for Retributive Theory We have the pure retributivists, who believe that a person should be punished because they wronged them just because they deserve it.
What exactly is retributivist theory?According to the principle of retributive justice, when a person violates the law, they must pay a price in order for justice to be served, and the punishment for a crime must be proportionate to the offence.
The penalty must be appropriate and applied on the same scale as the offence in order to be considered retributive justice. The expressions "an eye for an eye" and "a tooth for a tooth," which are mentioned in the books of Exodus and Leviticus, were used to illustrate vengeance in biblical times.
To know more about retributivist theory visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13975236
#SPJ4
Which is a reason ethics are important to law enforcement?
Answers
Answer:
Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.
Explanation:
the which of the following Suggests that al
Solution to all social problems, including crime
traps formation of human beings, mutual deppe-
reduction of class structures. the Creats
ammunities of caring people and unie
Social Justice ?
A Radical theory
B British or left realism
C Peacemaking Crminology
D Femmist theory
Answers
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
is law civics if so
What role is exemplified by the President vetoing a bill that was passed by Congress? Chief Diplomat Chief of State Chief Executive Chief Legislator
Answers
answer: Chief Legislator
the authors state that governmental policy does not necessarily reflect the interests—indeed, the welfare—of the public, even though it is intended to do so. which is not a reason given for this
Answers
There could be several reasons why government policy may not necessarily reflect the interests or welfare of the public, even if it is intended to do so.
One possible reason is that politicians and policymakers may have their own personal interests or biases that influence their decision-making, which may not align with those of the public. Additionally, political parties and special interest groups may have a significant influence on the policy-making process, often prioritizing their own interests over the broader public interest. Another reason could be the inherent complexity of policymaking, which can involve balancing multiple competing interests and priorities, making it difficult to fully satisfy everyone. Finally, limited resources and budget constraints may force policymakers to make difficult choices that may not always align with the interests of the public. Ultimately, the reasons why governmental policy may not always reflect the interests or welfare of the public are complex and multifaceted, and require careful consideration and analysis to fully understand.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
if a person has a restraining order placed on a stalker in one state, to other states are required to enforce the order as if they had issued it. what clause does this scenario represent
Answers
If a person has a restraining order placed on a stalker in one state, two other states are required to enforce the order as if they had issued it. This scenario represents the clause of an out-of-state restraining order. A restraining order essentially stands for a protective order.
A restraining order is an order that is issued as a protective order for a plaintiff from stalking and harassing by prohibiting and debarring the defendant from doing certain things.
In a situation where a person has a restraining order placed on a stalker in one state, two other states are required to enforce the order as if they had issued it. An out-of-state restraining order ensures the same. In which case, the police and legal authorities have the responsibility to uphold and enforce the protective order while maintaining the regulations of the restraining order, in such a scenario. Police and legal authorities cannot retract the protective order if the stalker moves from one state to the other. The legal authorities of the other states are required to enforce the restraining order as if they had issued it.If a person has a restraining order placed on a stalker in one state, two other states are required to enforce the order as if they had issued it. This scenario represents the clause of an out-of-state restraining order.
Learn more about restraining orders here: https://brainly.com/question/12982121
#SPJ4
Look at the various immigrant visas available. In your opinion, what is the reasoning behind these visa categories? What policy goals do they serve?
Answers
Visas are required if you want to travel to a country that does not share a visa policy with your home country. Many countries have visa policies and treaties in place that allow their citizens to freely travel between them without the need for a visa.
What does the phrase "need sponsorship for a Visa" mean?A company's readiness to offer access sponsorship to highly qualified individuals from outside the US is noted. Employers must navigate a challenging process. To sponsor a ticket, they must be able to show that they would require American citizens with the necessary qualifications to work at their entrances.
When asked if they currently or in the future intend to apply for job visa sponsorship, almost all students should respond "yes." Because their CPT or OPT expires, the majority of international graduates will search for H-1B and possibly other work visa sponsorship.
Learn more about visa sponsorship with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/4487826
#SPJ10
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th amendment?.
Answers
Based on the data, the conclusion which can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment is that, The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
What is the 19th Amendment?
On June 4, 1919, the Congress approved the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and on August 18, 1920, it was ratified. Women now have the right to vote thanks to the 19th Amendment. Women began to demand the right to vote in the middle of the 19th century through protests, petitions, and acts of civil disobedience, but it took them decades to succeed.
For American women, reaching this milestone was challenging since it required a protracted and challenging battle, but it was a win. The right to vote for women in America is thus legally guaranteed by the 19th amendment.
The 19th Amendment had a significant impact on the rising number of votes cast by American women, according to the data. Even decades after American women were granted the right to vote, their number of votes has continued rising and they now outnumber men.
To know more about 19th Amendment refer:
https://brainly.com/question/9822287
#SPJ4
Disclaimer- The complete question is-
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment?
The high percentage of women voters has had a political impact.
Despite the opportunity to vote, women do not vote as often as men
Despite the ability to vote, women register in lower numbers than men.
The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
In the space below, rewrite the following statement. Your goal is to eliminate all unnecessary words:
At the time when the parties entered into the agreement of purchase and sale it is important to note that neither of them had knowledge of contents of the dresser drawer. Because of the fact that previous to the contract the seller did not own the dresser and the seller’s mother had not had many valuable pieces of jewelry despite having a large income, the seller had made the assumption that the dresser did not contain anything. Due to the fact that the seller had made a statement to the buyer of the fact that his mother did not own any jewelry in the buyer’s thinking, he had no purpose to make any further investigation or inspection of the drawers as he might otherwise have considered making. For these reasons, there was no provision in the contract for an upward modification in the payment to be made by the buyer to the seller in the event that the dresser drawer later proved to be filled with jewels.
Answers
Answer:
The parties entered into an agreement of purchase and sale without knowledge of the contents of the dresser drawer. The seller did not own the dresser, and the seller's mother did not have valuable jewelry, so the seller assumed the dresser was empty. The buyer did not investigate the drawers because the seller stated the dresser contained no jewelry. Therefore, the contract did not include an upward modification of payment in case the dresser drawer contained jewels.
licensing refers to a contractual agreement in which the licensor grants access to its patents, trade secrets, or technology for a fee paid by the licensee. True or False?
Answers
A licensing refers to a contractual agreement in which the licensor grants access to its patents, trade secrets, or technology for a fee paid by the licensee. The given statement is "True."
What is licensing, In other words, Licensing is a business model that enables a business to use another firm's intellectual property for commercial purposes. Licenses allow companies to enter new markets, obtain competitive advantages, and add revenue streams to their businesses.
It's a type of revenue-sharing agreement in which the license holder agrees to pay a fee to the licensor in exchange for the right to use the licensor's intellectual property.
therefore the correct statement is "True."
For more such questions on licensing
brainly.com/question/24827828
#SPJ11
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
Russell Hardin, political scientist, "Civil Liberties in the Era of Mass Terrorism," Journal of Ethics, 2004
Answers
The reasons for US foreign policy debates are the contentious national security efforts to combat terrorism. The choice B is correct.
U.S. foreign policy places a strong emphasis on safeguarding human rights and promoting democracy and freedom around the world. The three most important objectives of American foreign policy are world peace, prosperity, and security. Security, or the safeguarding of American interests and citizens, is a constant concern; however, over its long history, the United States has attempted to achieve security in various ways.
Under the Constitution, the Leader of the US decides U.S. international strategy. The President's chief foreign affairs advisor is the Secretary of State, who was appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Learn more about U.S.foreign policy :
brainly.com/question/27710490
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
A. Some people asserted that the United States should return to isolationism.
B. The national security efforts to prevent terrorism were controversial.
C. The decision to go to war in Iraq deeply divided the American people.
D. Some people argued that fossil fuel dependence undercut national security.
help me please to answer this
Answers
List the different courts in your state (Texas is my state)
Answers
Answer:
mines texas tooo hayyyyyyy!!!!
Explanation:
Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence.
Answers
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Determine whether the following scenarios are a violation of or are in compliance with the United States Constitution and label them accordingly, being sure to include the constitutional amendment related to the situation.
Tyrell has selected a series of witnesses to examine which will attest to his client’s innocence.
Answer: In compliance with the United States Constitution. Sixth Amendment.
Explanation:
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures the rights of criminal offenders. One of those rights is to "have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor," which is what Tyrell has done in this scenario.
Other guaranteed rights are having a public trial, a lawyer, an impartial jury, and the knowledge about the accusers, the charges, and the evidence.
t is important for a licensee or broker to remove ambiguity when a seller's unclear decision could be discriminatory by forcing the seller to
Answers
Answer: Articulate his or her concerns
Explanation:
If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.
Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting for his trial, a New York undercover officer was placed in Benny’s cell. Before the officer asked any questions, Benny said that he had robbed the cab driver. Benny’s statement was used against him at trial, despite his objection that he was not read his Miranda Rights, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Question: Should the court allow Benny’s statement to be used in court?
Answers
The end result of rescinding the contract is
Answers
Answer:
It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).
Explanation:
selina moved to a state that limits the types of business activities in which parties can legally engage on sundays. this type of law is known as a _____ law.
Answers
Selina moved to a state that limits the types of business activities in which parties can legally engage on Sundays. This type of law is known as a Blue Law.
Blue Laws are regulations that restrict certain activities, including commercial and leisure activities on Sundays or other designated religious or ceremonial days. These laws were originally created to enforce religious observance and promote rest and worship on the Sabbath day. Blue Laws were first introduced in the United States in the early colonial period and were initially intended to regulate moral behavior. However, as society became more secular, the focus shifted to economic and commercial regulation. Today, many Blue Laws have been repealed or modified, but some still exist, limiting certain activities on Sundays or other religious holidays.
To know more about Blue Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15298514
#SPJ11
On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question.
Explanation:
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answers
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
Claire and Donny want to use a contract to enforce a business deal. Which of the following would most solidly enforce to terms of their agreement?
Answers
( HELP FAST ) The Great Seal of the Department of Homeland Security contains tremendous symbolism—which of the following are elements within the seal that demonstrate its symbolic protection of this country? Select all that apply.
1: a dark sky with twenty-two stars, each representing one of the agencies within the DHS
2: olive branches and arrows, representing the ability to preserve peace and wage war
3: the wings of the eagle breaking through the surrounding ring to emphasize a willingness to break through bureaucracy to fulfill the mission
4: a map of North America, demonstrating a willingness to provide protection to both Canada and Mexico
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer should be number 3 am not sure just tried
What is the difference between fundamental rights and principle of policy in pakistan
Answers
Answer:
I don't know if this is fully right as I study American Law but here is my answer.
Explanation:
Fundamental Rights are justiciable, as they can be enforced, whereas the directive principles are non-justiciable, in that, they are not enforceable in the court of law. While fundamental rights establish political democracy, directive principles set social and economic democracy.