Which type of dwelling did the Gulf Native Americans live in?
a.
tipis
b.
pueblos
c.
adobe houses
d.
houses covered with grass or animal hides
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer: pueblos
Explanation:
Use the illustration above and your knowledge of social studies to answer the
following question.
63.
What management innovation that improved production is illustrated in this
A. Bessemer
B. Assembly line
C. Robotics
D. Unionization
Answer:
Assembly line
Explanation:
The graphic shows an assembly line, a management innovation that cut manufacturing costs and increased production efficiency by segmenting the production process into smaller, more manageable tasks.
How did manufacturing improve thanks to the Bessemer process?By exploiting the iron's impurities to generate the required heat, the Bessemer process made it possible to produce steel without the use of fuel. The price of making steel was significantly reduced as a result, although it could be challenging to find raw materials with the necessary properties.
How often was the Bessemer method applied?The second part of the 19th century saw significant advancements in steel production from a small-scale pig-iron output. Steel ingot production was made possible by the Bessemer process in 1855.
To know more about assembly visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28146052
#SPJ1
What were the 95 theses?
Answer:
The 95 theses ideas that martin luther wrote that contradicted the catholic churches teachings and helped form the protestant reformation
Explanation:
who was the buddha and what does the term buhhda mean?
Siddhartha is the historical founder of Buddhism, often referred to as "the Buddha". Buddha means "awakened" or "which has become aware".
The clan name of the historical figure referred to as the Buddha (whose life is known largely as legend) was Gautama (in Sanskrit) or called Gotama (in Pali), and the name given to him was Siddhartha (in Sanskrit it means: “he who achieves his aim”).
Buddhists believe that human life is a cycle of suffering and rebirth, but if someone achieves a state of enlightenment known as (nirvana), then it is possible to escape this cycle forever. Siddhartha Gautama was the first person to reach this state of enlightenment who was still today, known as the Buddha.
The 3 important Buddhist beliefs:
Dukkha: Life is painful and causes suffering. Many people might say that Buddhism is pessimistic. ...Anitya: Life is in constant flux. Anitya or "impermanence" means that life as we know it is in constant flux. ...Anatma: The self is always changing.The teaching founded by the Buddha is known, in English, as Buddhism. It may be asked, who is the Buddha? A Buddha has attained Bodhi; and by Bodhi, it meant wisdom, an ideal state of intellectual and ethical perfection that can be achieved by man through purely human means.
The term Buddha means enlightened one, a knower. Buddhists believe that a Buddha is born in each eon of time, and our Buddha—the sage Gotama who attained enlightenment under the bo tree at Buddh Gaya in India—was the seventh in the succession.
Learn more about Budhha at,
https://brainly.com/question/98112
The Buddha, meaning "enlightened", was the founder of the religion Buddhism, highly prominent in East & Southeastern Asia.
The Buddha, whose real name was Siddhartha Gautama, founded the philosophical religion in India around 2,500 years ago and has 470 million followers globally. Some of his main teachings include:
The non-existence of a supreme deity, but the achievement of enlightenment. The constant practice of meditation, and the use of morality and wisdom to reach the ultimate stage of nirvana. The concepts of karma and reincarnation.The Buddha was said to have found enlightenment whilst seated under a Bodhi tree. When he passed away in 483 BC, his teachings were collated and formed into a set of philosophies that his followers began to spread far and wide.
To know more about Buddhism, go to https://brainly.com/question/27966664
1. In three to five sentences, explain how the Revolutionary War ended. 2. In three to five sentences, compare the viewpoints of free and enslaved African Americans during the American Revolution. HELP I NEED TO DO THIS TODAY!
How did the Revolutionary War end in the United States?
While the battle of Yorktown ended major land operations for the Combatants, the war at sea continued, driven by privateers on both sides who wanted to make as much money as possible before the coming Peace. Nova Scotia continued to be especially hard hit with ‘wolf packs’ of American privateers praying on British shipping and coastal towns like Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, being raided (yet again) in early 1782. A Royal Navy vessel H.M.S. ‘Observer’ also fought a successful action at the mouth of Halifax Harbor in May of that year against the American privateer ‘Jack’. Right into the Spring of 1783 privateers continued to seize vessels but word soon filtered through of a preliminary Peace between England and America. As no ‘privateer’ wanted to be considered a ‘pirate’ with the Peace, the activity at sea dropped off by mid-1783. The final Peace came in September of that year.
African Americans:Both sides had several thousand free and enslaved blacks fighting for their cause. While the American continental army had slightly more on their side, many of those were slaves forced into labor jobs for the army.
The British promised freedom to slaves who left their slave plantations and fought for them, thousands did. Some examples of this are lord Dunmores Ethiopian regiment and the Black brigade, and the defence of savannah which saw freed slaves fight on the side of the British against an American and french attack. Thomas Jefferson referred to these freed black loyalists soldiers as ‘the fugitives’. One of the regiments known as ‘The black brigade’, were one of the most feared british militias in New Jersey.
After the war, there were over 3000 black loyalists in New York that were evacuated to Nova Scotia, the West Indies or back to Britain. Thanks to the ‘book if negroes’ they had a list of all those who served, and when they found that someone who had served with them was forced back into slavery, the British government sent an envoy to find them and pay for their freedom, relocating them to Canada. Those freed blacks who were reenslaved were brutally treated for having served in the British military. Many of those freed slaves who went to Canada and Britain struggled with the climate, so they relocated to a part of Africa owned by the British empire, and created the nation now known as Sierra Leone. The reason why they went to Britain in the first place was due to slavery being illegal in Britain, therefore there was no chance of reenslavement.
The americans sometimes made the same promises of freedom after military service however there are many examples where they went back on that promise and reenslaved those who served. Unfortunately after independence African Americans were barred from military service, now noting that only ‘free able bodied white male citizens’ could join the military. Some southern slave owners not only went after their slaves who had defected to the British side, but attempted to enslave any black they had, the government turned a blind eye to this due to the wording in the peace negotiations that stated the US could take back any ‘American property’, slaves being seen as ‘american property’.
Compare the ways that Herodotus and Thucydides approached
the writing of history.
Herodotus enjoyed sensationalizing his accounts and employing exaggeration. He was a historical storyteller rather than an actual historian.
Thucydides was a real historian who sought to preserve and transmit accurate information about what occurred and when.
What distinguishes Herodotus' and Thucydides' writings?Thucydides is regarded as a "scientific historian," presenting a "factual" account of history via facts, dates, events, and people. He opposed any dependence on the supernatural, disliked subjectivity, and was concerned with writing solely about events in his own time, the only area of history where he could directly verify by inspection of written documents and eyewitness testimonies. He is known as the "Father of the Historical Method."
On the other hand, Herodotus is regarded as a sensational historian,' relying on a mix of oral stories, gossip, myths, and rumors and combining it with his own interpretation of events, leaving the reader to make of it what they will. He is considered the polar opposite of what it means to be a historian since he made no attempt to uncover 'truth' on a factual basis and was satisfied to present different stories of events and leave it up to the reader to decide which one they associated with the most.
To learn more about Herodotus and Thucydides, click
https://brainly.com/question/13670334
#SPJ1
How did the two-party system change during 1852-1856.
Answer: As late as 1850, the two-party system seemed healthy. Democrats and Whigs drew strength in all parts of the country. Then, in the early 1850s, the two-party system began to disintegrate in response to massive foreign immigration. By 1856 the Whig Party had collapsed and been replaced by a new sectional party, the Republicans.
Between 1846 and 1855, more than three million foreigners arrived in America. In cities such as Chicago, Milwaukee, New York, and St. Louis immigrants actually outnumbered native-born citizens. Opponents of immigration capitalized on working-class fear of economic competition from cheaper immigrant labor, and resentment against the growing political power of foreigners.
In 1849 a New Yorker named Charles Allen responded to this anti-Catholic hostility by forming a secret fraternal society made up of native-born Protestant working men. Allen called this secret society "The Order of the Star Spangled Banner," and it soon formed the nucleus of a new political party known as the Know-Nothing or the American Party. The party received its name from the fact that when members were asked about the workings of the party, they were supposed to reply, "I know nothing."
By 1855 the Know-Nothings had captured control of the legislatures in parts of New England and were the dominant opposition party to the Democrats in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. In the presidential election of 1856, the party supported Millard Fillmore and won more than 21 percent of the popular vote and 8 Electoral votes. In Congress, the party had 5 senators and 43 representatives. Between 1853 and 1855, the Know Nothings replaced the Whigs as the nation's second largest party.
In 1855 Abraham Lincoln denounced the Know-Nothings in eloquent terms:
I am not a Know-Nothing. How could I be? How can anyone who abhors the oppression of Negroes be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me pretty rapid, as a nation we began by declaring "all men are created equal." We now practically read it, "all men are created equal, except Negroes." When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except Negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty-to Russia, for example, where despotism can be taken pure and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.
By 1856, the Know-Nothing Party was in decline. Many Know-Nothing officeholders were relatively unknown men with little political experience. In the states where they gained control, the Know Nothings proved unable to enact their legislative program, which called for:
a 21-year residency period before immigrants could become citizens and vote;
a limitation on political office holding to native-born Americans, and
restrictions on liquor sales.
Explanation:
Bakit importanteng pagaralan ang hiram na salita at pagbabaybay ng salita? filipino po ito ginawa ko lang history
Answer:
\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)\( \)
give three differences between the english and the french in the new world. what was one advantage each side had over the other?
Answer:
Expert-Verified Answer
No one rated this answer yet — why not be the first?
tiwariakdi
Ambitious
2.8K answers
536.4K people helped
In the New World, there were two differences between the English and the French:
Patterns of settlement: The English settled primarily along the coast, while the French established settlements along rivers and trading posts.
Relationships with Indigenous Peoples: The English frequently attempted to displace and conquer Indigenous peoples, whereas the French formed alliances and established trading partnerships with them.
Unlike the French and Dutch, who coexisted peacefully with the native Americans by trading furs with them, the English sought to populate their North American colonies. This entailed driving the indigenous peoples off their land.
For example, autocratic sovereigns ruled over France and Spain, and their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. English colonists, on the other hand, had far more freedom and could govern themselves as long as they followed English law and remained loyal to the king.
One fundamental difference between French and English attitudes toward the land they acquired in North America was that the French were less interested in occupying territories and more interested in profiting from the land.
Question 9 of 10
During the Harding presidency, the Supreme Court acted:
WILL MARK AS BRAINLIST DONT FORGET :)
How did the American Revolution affect women?
Became more politically active
Drove horse-drawn wagons
Took care of their families
Traded goods at the general store
Hundred percent sure its A
Answer:
Became more politically active
Explanation:
because some of them acted like spies or disguised themselves like men in the war, they suppied the troops and they worked in the military camps
Can some answer this for me
Starting in the economic boom after World War II, advertising:
Starting in the economic boom after World War II, advertising experienced significant growth and transformation. The post-war period witnessed a surge in consumer demand and the rise of a more affluent middle class, which created a favorable environment for increased advertising.
During this time, advertising became more sophisticated and pervasive, utilizing various mediums such as print, radio, and television to reach a wider audience. Advertisers recognized the potential of television as a powerful tool for promoting products and services to a mass audience. Television commercials became a popular and effective way to capture people's attention and influence consumer behavior.
The advertising industry also benefited from technological advancements that allowed for more targeted and personalized advertising campaigns. Market research and data analysis became essential tools in understanding consumer preferences and tailoring advertisements accordingly. This led to the development of strategies like demographic targeting and segmentation, enabling advertisers to reach specific audiences with tailored messages.
Furthermore, advertising techniques and creative approaches evolved during this period. Advertisements increasingly focused on appealing to emotions, aspirations, and desires of consumers rather than simply presenting product features. Advertising agencies started employing psychological and persuasive tactics to create memorable and impactful campaigns.
The economic boom after World War II also led to increased competition among businesses, prompting them to invest heavily in advertising to differentiate themselves in the market. Brands began to emphasize branding and brand identity as a means to establish a distinct image and cultivate customer loyalty.
Overall, the post-World War II economic boom marked a turning point in the advertising industry. It witnessed the expansion of advertising into new mediums, the adoption of targeted marketing strategies, and the emergence of more sophisticated and persuasive advertising techniques. This period laid the foundation for the advertising landscape we see today, with advertising playing a significant role in shaping consumer culture and driving economic growth.
HOPE THIS HELP!!!!! :)
HELPPPPPPP I NEED THIS FONE IN 3 MINUTES HELP
Answer:
rippppppp kfj
Explanation:
FILL IN THE BLANK during the cold war, the united states was in conflict with the soviet union. the foreign policy model featuring two countries in conflict with each other is known as a ______ structure of international power.
The United States and the Soviet Union were at odds during the Cold War. The bipolar structure of international power is the foreign policy paradigm in which two nations are at odds with one another.
Following World War 2, the Soviet Union and the United States engaged in a 50-year conflict known as the "Cold War." Because the United States and the Soviet Union never engaged in direct combat, the conflict is known as a "cold" war.
Because of the Soviet Union's growing military might, the Cold War broke out. In an effort to limit communism, the United States started keeping an eye on the military of the Soviet Union. The United States started supplying for a war as a result.
Learn more about bipolar visit: https://brainly.com/question/29847782
#SPJ4
Which of the following best states an argument of French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau?
In order for a government's laws to be valid, citizens have to agree with those laws.
Governments should have a legislative branch, which would have the power to create laws.
Kings and queens hold absolute power, and citizens must follow the laws of their country.
O A democracy can work only if citizens agree to give up some of their individual rights.
Answer:
A. is the right answer
Explanation:
In order for a government's laws to be valid, citizens have to agree with those laws is best states an argument of French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Hence, option A is correct.
Who was French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau?French philosopher and author Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived in the Age of Enlightenment. He devised the social contract theory, also known as contractarianism, which had a major influence on the French Revolution as well as the development of liberal, conservative, and socialist doctrine. This is a key component of his political philosophy.
Renowned for reframing the social contract as an agreement between an individual and a group of people who share a "universal will" reflected in the rules of an ideal state and intended to further the common good, Jean-Jacques Rousseau is the father of the modern social contract theory.
Additionally, Rousseau said that the foundation of contemporary society is a fictitious social contract that supports inequality and the power of the few.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about Jean-Jacques Rousseau, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11427899
#SPJ2
How did Woodrow Wilson’s presidential win in 1912 set a precedent?
Wilson won more of the popular vote than any previous president.
Wilson won the electoral college but less than fifty percent of the popular vote.
Wilson won the popular vote and lost the electoral college.
Wilson won when votes were recounted after a close election.
Woodrow Wilson's presidential win in 1912 set a precedent in that he won the electoral college but less than fifty percent of the popular vote. Option C is the correct answer.
In the 1912 election, Woodrow Wilson, the Democratic candidate, faced a divided opposition. The Republican Party was split between the incumbent President William Howard Taft and former President Theodore Roosevelt, who ran as a third-party candidate under the Progressive (or Bull Moose) Party.
This division among Republicans resulted in a weakened Republican vote, which worked to Wilson's advantage.
While Wilson did not secure an outright majority of the popular vote, he won the electoral college by a comfortable margin, receiving 435 electoral votes compared to his opponents' combined 96 electoral votes. This victory demonstrated that it was possible for a candidate to win the presidency without obtaining a majority of the popular vote.
This precedent set by Wilson's win in 1912 has had implications for subsequent elections. It showed that winning the electoral college, which ultimately determines the outcome of the presidential election, is more important than winning an outright majority of the popular vote.
It highlighted the significance of strategically securing electoral votes from various states rather than relying solely on a broad-based appeal to the popular vote. Option C is the correct answer.
For such more question on vote:
https://brainly.com/question/1330417
#SPJ8
Who delivered the “We shall overcome” speech that Martin Luther King Jr. was moved by?
Answer: And we shall overcome.” Martin Luther King, Jr., used the words in his final sermon in Memphis in 1968, just before his assassination. And they echoed several days later in the singing of the 50,000 people at his funeral.
Explanation: PLZZZ give me a brainly
How were the lives of free African Americans similar to those of enslaved African Americans in the 1700s?
Neither group was allowed to legally marry.
They both could live wherever they wanted.
Neither group had true equality with whites.
They both could receive an education.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
peace outt...
In the seventeenth century, the Hapsburg Empire
OA) lost control of Hungary, Croatia, and Slavonia to the Turks.
O B) retained its Holy Roman Empire in Germany.
C) remained a collection of territories.
D) established a centralized, absolutist state.
Answer: I believe the answer is C: Remained a collection of territories.
Explanation: Before the 17th century the Hapsburg Empire spent its time vastly expanding their territory, but by the end of the 16th century, they reached the zenith of their power, and I THINK that after/towards the end of the 17th century, they began to fall.
I hope this helps~!
In the seventeenth century, the Hapsburg Empire remained a collection of territories. Correct option is c.
In the seventeenth century, the Habsburg Empire (sometimes spelled as Hapsburg) remained a collection of territories rather than a fully centralized, absolutist state. The Habsburg Empire was a vast and diverse conglomerate of territories and holdings ruled by the Habsburg family, and it included various regions such as Austria, Hungary, Bohemia, parts of Italy, the Low Countries, and more. These territories were often governed with varying degrees of autonomy and had their own laws, customs, and administrative systems.
While efforts were made to centralize power and strengthen the authority of the Habsburg rulers, the empire's vast and diverse nature made complete centralization challenging. The Habsburg rulers often had to navigate the complexities of regional identities, cultures, and languages, which contributed to the empire remaining more of a collection of distinct territories rather than a fully unified, absolutist state.
To know more about Hapsburg Empire :
https://brainly.com/question/81734
#SPJ2
summarize at least two Enlightenment ideas that influenced the founding fathers of the United States.
Answer:
The idea that everyone is free.
Freedom of the Press
Freedom of Speech
in the sentence below from paragraph 3 what is the word staple mean
Answer:
how am I suppose to know what your not talking about when you didn't even put a image in image of what ?
Answer:
Paragraph 3:
HISTORICAL
a center of trade, especially in a specified commodity.
Explanation:
Why did the Dutch primarily trade from Nagasaki during the Tokugawa period in Japan?
A. Nagasaki was considered the best place for commerce in Japan.
B. Japan wanted to encourage the growth of the city.
C. Nagasaki was the center of Japanese government.
D. Japan followed a policy of isolation from other countries.
The Dutch traded from Nagasaki because D. Japan followed a policy of isolation from other countries.
Under the Tokugawa Shogunate, Japan was closed off completely from the rest of the world.
The Japanese however opened up an artificial island in Nagasaki that enabled them to trade with:
the Chinese the Portuguese and,the DutchIn conclusion, the Dutch traded from Nagasaki because Japan was an isolated country.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/20248714.
Answer:
D. Japan followed a policy of isolation from other countries.
Explanation:
Under the Tokugawa Shogunate, Japan was closed off completely from the rest of the world.
which of the following statements explains why there is so much nutrition and health misinformation? check all that apply.
-People are more likely to believe information they find on the internet
-Misinformation is often spread by people who are not experts in nutrition or health
-Marketing campaigns may spread inaccurate information
-People may misinterpret nutrition and health studies
What is campaigns ?Campaigns are an organized effort to promote a product, service, or cause. They typically involve multiple steps and are usually directed toward a specific audience. Campaigns involve a variety of elements such as strategy, creative, media, digital, and public relations. They typically involve a combination of tactics to reach the desired audience. In today’s digital world, campaigns often involve a mix of both offline and online tactics. This includes activities such as creating content, running ads, and creating social media campaigns. Campaigns are used to reach and engage a target audience and drive them to take a desired action. Ultimately, campaigns are all about connecting with the right people and delivering the right message at the right time.
To learn more about campaigns
https://brainly.com/question/20488930
#SPJ1
Why was the seven year war fought in 3 different areas
The Seven Years' War, which took place from 1756 to 1763, was fought in three different areas due to a combination of territorial ambitions, colonial disputes, and the involvement of various European powers.
The war was a global conflict involving major European powers, including Britain, France, Spain, Prussia, and Austria.The war was fought in Europe, particularly in Central Europe, where Prussia, led by Frederick the Great, clashed with Austria and its allies. The European theater of the war was primarily driven by dynastic rivalries, territorial disputes, and the desire for power and influence.The conflict extended to North America, where it is known as the French and Indian War. This theater of the war revolved around the competition between Britain and France for colonial dominance. The British sought to expand their territories and assert control over French-held regions, leading to engagements and campaigns in North America, particularly in the Ohio River Valley and along the eastern seaboard.The war spread to other parts of the world, including the Caribbean, South America, India, and the Philippines. These regions were significant colonial possessions for the European powers involved, and they became battlegrounds as each sought to protect or expand their overseas territories.The war was fought in multiple areas due to the complex web of alliances, colonial ambitions, and strategic interests of the participating powers. The various theaters of the war reflected the global reach and interconnectedness of European colonial powers during that period.For more such questions on Seven Years' War
https://brainly.com/question/18144356
#SPJ8
A question I wish I could ask him Barack Obama is ?
Answer:
How's it feel to be the president of the best country on this planet ?
Which shows the correct order of dominance of empires in West Africa?
Answer:
Kingdom of Kush. 1000 BCE - 350CE. ...
Kingdom of Axum. 500-1000CE. ...
City-state of Kilwa. 800-1840CE. ...
Kingdom of Benin. 1200-1897CE. ...
Empire of Ghana. 300-900CE. ...
Empire of Songhai. 1400-1500s CE. ...
Empire of Mali. 1230-1464 CE. ...
Kingdom of Great Zimbabwe.
Explanation:
3. What were the main motivations for European expansion during the Age of Exploration? Be sure to
think about the idea of "Glory, Goods, and God," and cite evidence from the course to support your
response.
During the Age of Exploration, European expansion was driven by a combination of factors commonly referred to as "Glory, Goods, and God."
These motivations encompassed financial, political, non secular, and cultural factors that propelled European powers to explore and make bigger into new territories. Here is a detailed clarification of each motivation:
1.Glory: European powers sought to decorate their prestige and popularity through territorial enlargement. Explorers and monarchs aimed to gain reputation and glory through discovering new lands, claiming territories, and increasing their empires. This preference for glory changed into fueled by using a competitive environment among European powers, with every vying for dominance and looking for to surpass their competitors.
Evidence from the route: The voyages of Christopher Columbus serve as a top example of the search for glory. Columbus's voyages, sponsored by the Spanish monarchy, had been driven by a choice to find a western direction to Asia, declare new territories, and set up Spanish dominance. His discoveries delivered reputation to Spain and reinforced the popularity of the Spanish monarchy.
2.Goods: Economic concerns played a critical position in European expansion. European powers sought new trade routes to get admission to treasured goods, including spices, silk, precious metals, and comfort items, which had been in high demand. By organising direct alternate connections with the East, European traders aimed to pass the high-priced intermediary exchange routes dominated by using Arab and Italian merchants.
Evidence from the route: The exploration of Vasco da Gama is a tremendous example. Da Gama's a success voyage around the Cape of Good Hope in 1498 opened a direct maritime path from Europe to India, bypassing the Ottoman Empire and Arab traders. This allowed European powers to gain direct get entry to to lucrative spice trade, decreasing expenses and increasing profits.
3.God: Religious reasons also performed a sizeable position in European expansion. The spread of Christianity turned into seen as a non secular responsibility, and European powers sought to convert non-Christian populations to Christianity. This religious zeal turned into intertwined with a feel of cultural superiority, as Europeans believed their religious and cultural practices were advanced to the ones of indigenous peoples.
Evidence from the path: The Spanish conquistadors in the Americas offer a top example of the non secular motivation for enlargement. The Spanish crown, at the side of spiritual orders just like the Franciscans and Dominicans, aimed to transform the indigenous populations to Christianity. The conquest of the Aztec and Inca empires with the aid of Hernán Cortés and Francisco Pizarro, respectively, become followed by way of efforts to Christianize the native populations.
It is vital to be aware that at the same time as "Glory, Goods, and God" offer a framework for information European motivations, individual explorers and colonizers often had overlapping or various motives for his or her actions. Additionally, the impact of European enlargement on indigenous populations become complex and had long-lasting consequences, together with cultural assimilation, exploitation, and colonization.
Read more about the main motivations for European expansion during the Age of Exploration at:
https://brainly.com/question/3178354?referrer=searchResults
explain what the implications of historical violence on Chicanx-Latinx are today?
The implications of historical violence on Chicanx-Latinx today include intergenerational trauma, socio-economic disparities, cultural marginalization, institutional discrimination, and a driving force for activism and resilience.
The implications of historical violence on Chicanx-Latinx communities today are far-reaching. It has resulted in intergenerational trauma, perpetuated socio-economic disparities, marginalized cultural identities, reinforced institutional discrimination, and fueled activism and resilience. The enduring trauma from colonization, discrimination, and systemic oppression continues to impact the mental health and well-being of Chicanx-Latinx individuals. Socioeconomic disparities persist, limiting access to opportunities and resources. Cultural marginalization and erasure affect identity and cultural pride. Institutional discrimination remains a barrier in various spheres of life. However, historical violence has also sparked a sense of activism and resilience, driving community empowerment and the pursuit of social justice. Addressing these implications requires acknowledging historical injustices and working towards equity and inclusion for Chicanx-Latinx communities.In conclusion, the historical violence endured by Chicanx-Latinx communities has left a lasting impact, manifesting in intergenerational trauma, socio-economic disparities, cultural marginalization, institutional discrimination, and a resilient spirit of activism.
For more such questions on historical violence:
https://brainly.com/question/31038160
#SPJ8
Which 2 spheres would be affected the most if a glacier came and covered the United States (pick two)
Cryosphere
Atmosphere
Biosphere
Geosphere
Hydrosphere