Answer:
The building of theory occurs in two major stages – the descriptive stage and the
normative stage. Within each of these stages, theory builders proceed through three steps. The
the theory-building process iterates through these stages again and again.1
In the past,
management researchers have quite carelessly applied the term theory to research activities that
pertain to only one of these steps. Terms such “utility theory” in economics, and “contingency
theory” in organization design, for example, actually refer only to an individual stage in the
theory-building process in their respective fields. We propose that it is more useful to think of the
term “theory” as a body of understanding that researchers build cumulatively as they work
through each of the three steps in the descriptive and normative stages. In many ways, the term
“theory” might better be framed as a verb, as much as it is a noun – because the body of
understanding is continuously changing as scholars who follow this process work to improve it.
Which of the following options indicate the logical reasons to study Political Science
as a field in general, and American Government as a course in particular?
a) Government and politics impacts nearly every aspect of our lives.
b) For good career opportunities
c) Learning Politics and following it can be fun
d) All are good answers
The correct option is D. All good answers indicate the logical reasons to study Political Science.
Students who choose to major in political science will study both theory and practice of government as part of their social science education.
What is the purpose of studying this political science?Students who study political science gain a solid understanding of the value of political engagement and are better equipped to participate in local and national politics.
Students majoring in political science should be able to: Recognize and apply the techniques political scientists employ to address political concerns. To comprehend and evaluate competing hypotheses and interpretations, use critical thinking and evidence. Create and present in writing an argument that is well-organized and backed up by evidence.
Learn more about Political Science here:
https://brainly.com/question/1134073
#SPJ1
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
How did the fact that justice marshall was a federalist influence his ruling in the mcculloch case?.
Answer: The case is in maintaining the rule of suggested powers, broadening the control of the government impressively, and laying the sacred establishments for the modern bargain in 1930 and the welfare state of 1960.
Explanation:
The federal trade commission requires franchisors to.
Answer:
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Franchise Rule is a disclosure rule that requires a franchisor offering or selling a franchise located in the United States of America to provide the prospective franchisee with the relevant information about the franchise.
What are the different ways to create an ethical climate in the organization
Answer:
Important tools for building an ethical, inclusive organizational climate include core ideology, codes of ethics, preventing and eliminating destructive behaviors, fostering diversity, socializa- tion, and training.
Explanation:
credits :- wikipedia
Investigators take samples of blood from the floor of a kidnapping victim's kitchen. The presence of blood might indicate that the missing person was wounded before they were kidnapped. Investigators are also informed by the family that the victim had a large Labrador retriever who is also missing. What test would the investigators use to determine if the blood was from the kidnapping victim or the victim's dog?
Well first you would need to know if the vet has any records of the dogs blood. Then you would also need to know if the they kidnapping victims doctor had samples of the victims blood. Then you would cross test the samples if the doctors had them to look for a match. !!! I AM NOT AN EXPERT THIS IS JUST WHAT I WOULD CONCLUDE !!!
Answer: Precipitin test
Explanation:
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately __________ percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016.
Answer:
28 percent
Explanation:
Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.
Explain how the decision in bush v. Vera could affect the process of redistricting for congressional representation in other states.
The ruling in Bush v. Vera may encourage state redistricting by establishing new districts based on the presence of socioeconomic minorities.
The purpose of the case Bush v. Vera was to evaluate examples of racial gerrymandering, which allows social minority to get attention and representation in the formation of districts.This occurred because states with a majority of their population made up of persons from social minorities were overlooked in the establishment of districts, resulting in a low representation of these minority in Congress.In this case, it was found that state redistricting should be encouraged since it was covered by the Fourteenth Amendment, which allows for the creation of new districts.Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952, is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court addressing racial gerrymandering, in which racial minority majority-electoral districts were formed during Texas' 1990 redistricting in order to enhance minority Congressional representation.To learn more about Bush V. Vera, refer: https://brainly.com/question/25893631
#SPJ4
In the event of isolation during operations other than war, the reasons to delay contact with legitimate authorities include. (Select all that apply)
Prevent recognition
Contact friendly forces
Gain situational awareness
Lack of control
Answer:
lel,
A
Explanation:
In the event of isolation during operations other than war, the reasons to delay contact with legitimate authorities includes the Contact friendly forces & Gain situational awareness. The correct option is (B & C).
What do you mean by the event of isolation?Isolated can also refer to a single event or incident in addition to far or apart. The high school pupils promised that the cafeteria food battle would never, ever happen again and gave their administrator assurances that it was an isolated incident.
The following are some justifications for delaying contact with authorized authorities in the event of isolation during actions other than war. Leaving traces of your existence aids the U.S. Government's search for, identification of, and recovery of you.
Observer reporting and media reporting are the two categories of reporting isolated incidents.
Therefore, in the event of isolation during operations other than war, the reasons to delay contact with legitimate authorities includes the Contact friendly forces & Gain situational awareness.
To know more about the event of isolation, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17407480
#SPJ2
How to write a Research question
Answer:
The research question, for example, states the issue or problem you will be talking about. A good rule ought to be that it should be, clear and focused.
A good question would be the following...
What is the environmental impact of plastic water bottles?
Explanation:
This helps you draft your research and focus on how you will present the information.
Answer:
Step 1: Choose a topic by identifying a broad area of interest.
Step 2: Find background information to help you understand your topic.
Step 3: Define your research question.
Step 4: Modify and refine your search question to achieve a manageable focus.
Explanation:
hopes this helps :)
the discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the: group of answer choices judge to have a chance to review the arguments before they make them before the jury parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the judge, who discovers the truth parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the jury, so it can discover the truth all of the other choices are correct
The correct answer is C, The discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts."
The discovery stage refers to the initial phase of a project or process, where the focus is on gathering information, conducting research, and exploring potential opportunities or solutions. It is a crucial step that lays the foundation for the entire project, helping to identify objectives, constraints, and risks.
During the discovery stage, teams engage in activities such as market analysis, customer research, and competitor assessments. They aim to understand the problem or need they are addressing, define project goals, and gain insights into the target audience. This stage often involves brainstorming sessions, interviews, surveys, and data analysis to uncover valuable information.
To know more about Discovery stage refer to-
brainly.com/question/28390799
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
The discovery stage in the trial process is intended for the: group of answer choices
A). Judges to have a chance to review the arguments before they make them before the jury.
B). Parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the judge, who discovers the truth.
C). Parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts.
D). Parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the jury, so it can discover the truth all of the other choices are correct
2
• Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human
Rights violation
Answer:
Two ways in which laws protect citizens against possible human rights violations are, on the one hand, the explicit recognition of the natural rights to life, liberty and private property as fundamental pillars of the legal systems of each country and , on the other, the establishment of sanctions (such as imprisonment, fines, or even capital punishment, among others) for the eventual violation of these rights.
b. describe one difference between the role played by party leaders in the house and the role played by party leaders in the senate.
One key difference between the role played by party leaders in the House of Representatives and the Senate is the level of control they have over their respective chambers. The House of Representatives is a larger chamber with more members.
which means that the party leader in the House has to work harder to maintain discipline and keep members in line. As a result, the House party leader has more centralized power, including the ability to assign committee assignments, set the legislative agenda, and enforce party discipline through the use of tactics like whipping votes. In contrast, the Senate is a smaller chamber with fewer members, which means that individual senators have more independence and are less subject to party pressure.
This means that the Senate party leader has to rely more on persuasion and negotiation to achieve their goals, and has less direct control over the legislative process. For example, while the Senate party leader can set the legislative agenda and influence the flow of legislation, they have less power to dictate committee assignments or control the debate on the floor.
To know more about Role play visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/31950233
#SPJ11
3.
The first step to merging is entering the ramp and
A. honking to indicate your location
B. matching your speed
C. signaling your intent
D. telling your passengers where you're going
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Signaling your intent
Give an example of a case whereby you have experienced that the law was able to contribute to a peaceful and harmonious community
Laws are set rules that guides against bad act and individual who does such will be punished.
What is law?Law are set of rules that guides an individual act or behavior.
In a community or country laws are given to guide and regulate the way we conduct ourselves, for order and justice.
In case of indiscriminate killing,there are set rules that guides against such act and individual who does such will be punished.
Therefore, laws are set rules that guides against bad act and individual who does such will be punished.
Learn more on Law here,
https://brainly.com/question/186782
Whilst you have been away on annual leave, the Principal of your agency has exchanged contracts to personally purchase one of your listings. You do not believe that your vendor is aware of the fact that it is your employer, as it has been purchased in a company name and there is no declaration on the file or on the copy of the contract in the file. The cooling off period will expire at 5pm today.
Identify and explain the ethical issue in this scenario, quoting any relevant legislation?
How would you approach this with your Agency Principal to express your concern? Ensure you detail at least 2 communication strategies you would use?
What steps would you take to ensure this sale can proceed ethically, and how would you appropriately communicate this to the vendor?
The ethical issue in this scenario is that the Principal of the agency has purchased one of the agency's listed properties without disclosing this to the vendor.
What is a agency?An agency relationship is a fiduciary relationship in which one person (the "principal") authorises another person (the "agent") to act on his or her behalf. The agent is under the control of the principal and must comply with her instructions.
Agents must "avoid any conduct that could lead to a conflict of interest or creates the perception of a conflict of interest," according to the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act of 2002. This means that it is unethical for the agency's Principal to purchase a property listed with the agency without informing the vendor of the potential conflict of interest.
I would use two communication strategies when approaching the Agency Principal to express my concern.
To begin, I would have an open and honest conversation with the Principal to express my concerns. I would write down my concerns in the form of a detailed email. This email would outline the ethical concerns as well as the potential penalties that could be imposed if the sale is not conducted ethically.To ensure that the sale is conducted ethically:
I would advise the Principal to first openly disclose to the vendor that they are the buyer of the property and to inform them of any potential conflict of interest. The vendor should then be given the option to back out of the sale if they so desire.Therefore, I would advise the Principal to disclose the conflict of interest to the vendor and give them the option to withdraw from the sale. I would communicate this via a phone conversation and an email, to prevent the agency from facing potential fines, reprimands and legal action.
To learn more about agency, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29924569
#SPJ1
What are the opportunity cost of not providing national security
Explanation:
What is the opportunity cost of not doing something?
Opportunity cost is the value of something when a particular course of action is chosen. Simply put, the opportunity cost is what you must forgo in order to get something.
Answer:
The opportunity cost is time spent studying and that money to spend on something else. A farmer chooses to plant wheat; the opportunity cost is planting a different crop, or an alternate use of the resources (land and farm equipment). A commuter takes the train to work instead of
1) Which of the following factors makes it difficult to drive in reverse?
A) Looking back, the driver has a fairly large blind spot.
OB Most of the trajectory is done with the gears in reverse.
OC) The driver could be confused when turning the steering wheel.
OD Both A and C are correct answers.
Answer:
D. Both A and C are correct answers.
Match each tax credit to its description.
Each of the tax credit can be matched to the description as:
Convenience checks: consumers use these to reduce their available credit in exchange for cash.Installment loan: consumers make recurring fixed payments.Introductory interest free: consumers can enjoy a set period of zero interest credit.Revolving credit: consumers borrow an amount that they don’t have to pay off by a specific date.What is tax credit?A tax credit serves as a tax incentive that is been used and it help the taxpayers to subtract the amount of the credit that has been accrued by them from the total that are they owing the state.
It should be noted that this could be a credit granted in recognition of taxes already paid .
Read more about tax credit here:
https://brainly.com/question/17395659
#SPJ1
CHECK THE COMPLETE QUESTIONBELOW:
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Match each type of credit to its description.
convenience checks
installment loan
introductory interest free
revolving credit
Consumers make recurring fixed payments.
Consumers can enjoy a set period of zero interest credit.
Consumers use these to reduce their available credit in exchange for cash.
Consumers borrow an amount that they don’t have to pay off by a specific
the nevada enabling act required that the nevada constitution:
The Nevada Enabling Act required that the Nevada Constitution be drafted.
What was required by the Nevada Enabling Act?The Nevada Enabling Act, enacted in 1864 by the U.S. Congress, was a crucial step in Nevada's path towards statehood. It established the necessary conditions for Nevada to establish its own state government. Among the provisions outlined in the act was the requirement for Nevada to draft and adopt a state constitution.
This constitution would serve as the foundational document for the governance of the state. In response, the people of Nevada proceeded to draft and ratify their constitution later in 1864. This milestone marked an essential component in fulfilling the criteria set forth by the Nevada Enabling Act and ultimately led to Nevada's admission as the 36th state of the United States.
Learn more about the Nevada Enabling Act
brainly.com/question/28275016
#SPJ11
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
What is your opinion on the recent voter bill? Do you believe Washington D.C. should be a state? Do you think anyone including those without identification be able to vote.
Answer:
yes I do think washington should be a state
Explanation:
I say this because there are a total of 50 states and if we take washington out it would be 49 and it doesnt make any sense to take washington out
What do you think the purpose of our criminal justice system is? What do you think it should be? Think about punishment and rehabilitation.
Answer:
The purpose of criminal justice is to help those who have committed crimes to be able to have the right to rehabilitate for their actions and overall to become a better indvidual. It is effective as it offers moral support and educates offenders to become a better version of themselves. Punishment isn't an effective way of helping a criminal reform as it may increase the occurence of further crimes.
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
Describe what lawyers do in 2 paragraph.
Explain the major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases.
The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are
"direct influences," which include things like legal and political experiences."indirect and distant impacts," which include things like broad legal and political.What is a Judge?Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.
The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.
Read more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ1
The law requires slow-moving vehicles to turn off a two-lane highway at turnouts or other safe places when they are closely followed by:
The law requires slow-moving vehicles to turn off a two-lane highway at turnouts or other safe places when they are closely followed by a minimum of five vehicles, as per California Vehicle Code Section 21656.
According to California Vehicle Code Section 21656, the driver of a slow-moving vehicle should turn off the roadway at turnouts or other safe locations available to him or her when it is not possible to pass the vehicle without having to endangering oncoming traffic or himself or herself, if the vehicle is closely followed by five or more vehicles. This provision does not authorize the passing of the slow-moving vehicle in a no-passing zone or where passing is unsafe.
Thus, if a slow-moving vehicle is followed by a minimum of five vehicles, it is the law that the slow-moving vehicle should move over and let the other vehicles pass or pull off at a safe location to allow the following vehicles to pass without endangering themselves or oncoming traffic.
To know more about roadway visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28141330
#SPJ11
Sex-based discrimination cases are subject to which legal treatment test?
A. incitement test
B. strict scrutiny test
C. heightened scrutiny test
D. imminent lawless action test
E. ordinary scrutiny test
Sex-based discrimination cases are subject to the heightened scrutiny test. Heightened scrutiny is a legal standard applied by courts when evaluating laws or government actions that treat individuals differently based on their sex or gender.
Under this test, the government must demonstrate that the discriminatory law or action serves an important governmental interest and that the means employed to achieve that interest are substantially related to it. This standard places a higher burden on the government to justify sex-based classifications compared to the ordinary scrutiny test, which is a more lenient standard. Heightened scrutiny recognizes the significance of addressing and remedying gender-based discrimination and ensures that such distinctions are carefully examined and justified.
To read more about Scrutiny Test click here
https://brainly.com/question/27458017
#SPJ11
Which of these is legal conduct?
Reproducing a copyrighted song and selling it for profit
Patenting a white painted version of a red painted tool
Copyrighting a modification to an existing online game
Using a work computer to order lunch delivery
Using a work computer to order lunch delivery is a legal conduct
What is legal Conduct?Members of the legal profession are expected to uphold certain ethical standards in their work. They are a result of the growth of the legal field itself.
It should be noted that legality is different from ethics, legality is the state of being in compliance with the law. Concepts of right and wrong behavior are central to ethics.
Even though they may be legal, some people may not consider them to be moral. For instance, it is acceptable to test medications on animals in many nations, despite some people's ethical objections.
Learn more about legal Conduct here:
https://brainly.com/question/28050389
#SPJ1
Based on legal concepts and the available option, the statement that describes the legal conduct is Copyrighting a modification to an existing online game.
What is a Legal Conduct?Legal conduct is a term that is used to describe the principles of conducting activities that are bounded by law and if breached can result in a penalty.
Legal Conduct can be done in many ways, in as much as it follows the rules and regulations postulated by the law of the land or the government.
Given the available options, the statement that describes the legal conduct is the Copyrighting of a modification to an existing online game.
This is because the modification to an existing online game is a different work entirely, that can be protected through copyright. And with copyrights, registered businesses are protected. by law.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Option C. "copyrighting a modification to an existing online game."
Learn more about Legal Conduct here: https://brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
2. The concept of one car length of space between two vehicles for every ten miles per hour is the most current method of computing following distance. True or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is the 3 second rule
The statement that the conception of one car length of space between two vehicles for every ten miles per hour is the most current method of computing following distance is false.
What is distance?Distance is defined as a numerical representation of the distance between two objects. The term “distance” can be called as the physical measurement or an estimate based on other factors.
The given statement is the case of 3-second rule, means allow three full seconds between yourself and the vehicle in front of any person.
This can be done by using a limited point leading such as a sign that see on the side of the road, and then count “one-thousand-one, one-thousand- two, one-thousand-three.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
To learn more about the distance, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15172156
#SPJ2