Lincolns' wartime abridgements of civil liberties were essential to win the war. It wasn't something drastic, and it was only momentary. In order to manage how the battle was going, he had to control the populace.
Lincoln upheld the Constitution in order to stop furthering the erosion of public rights. The fact that Congress wasn't in session when they went to war reduced the amount of chaos. In order to win the war, Lincoln's restrictions on civil liberties during the conflict and his treatment of the Copperheads were not excessive. He abided by the Constitution, which was necessary to control the populace and steer the war in the right direction, to avoid reducing public rights. He could contribute in this way to lessen the chaos caused by the fact that the congress was not in session when they went to war.
To know more about civil liberties
brainly.com/question/2375577
#SPJ4
what factors contributed to the making of a revolutionary situation in russia by the beginning of the 20th century?
Industrialization and Factory development are some factors contributing to the creation of a revolutionary situation in Russia by the beginning of the 20th century.
Russian factory workers quickly developed a radical class consciousness that was based on harsh conditions and the absence of any legal outlet for their grievances. A small but growing number of educated Russians found a way of understanding the changes they witnessed daily and hope for a better future which shows a revolutionary upheaval of workers. World War I caused enormous hardships that coupled with the immense social tensions of industrialization within a still autocratic political system which help in sparking the Russian Revolution of 1917.
Know more about Industrialization here:
https://brainly.com/question/28495859
#SPJ4
Put the following events in timeline (chronological) order
20 points
Answer:
The end of the French and Indian War, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, the Boston Massacre, and the Boston Tea Party.
Explanation:
The end of the French and Indian War: 1763
The Stamp Act: 1765
The Townshend Acts: 1767
The Boston Massacre: 1770
The Boston Tea Party: 1773
The events listed in chronological order are;
The end of the French and Indian War
The Stamp Act
The Townshend Acts
The Boston Massacre
The Committee of Correspondence
The Boston Tea Party
Chronological order of the eventsThe French and Indian War ended in 1763, marking the beginning of a series of events that eventually led to the American Revolution. The Stamp Act was imposed by the British Parliament in 1765, followed by the Townshend Acts in 1767.
The Boston Massacre occurred in 1770, and the Committee of Correspondence was formed in 1772 as a means of communication and coordination among the colonies. Finally, the Boston Tea Party took place in 1773 as a protest against the Tea Act.
Read on Stamp Act on https://brainly.com/question/510781
#SPJ2
what piece depicts the history of populations often left out of major history books?
"The Gatekeepers" by Beau White is a piece of art that depicts the history of populations often left out of major history books.
The painting is a mural of a doorkeeper and their family, representing multiple generations of their family line and their place in history. The doorkeeper holds a key, emblematizing their capability to open the door to knowledge and understanding of other societies and histories. The tempera also includes symbols of different societies, histories, and
persuasions, similar as the crescent moon, a rosary, and a cross. This tempera is a memorial of the significance of understanding and esteeming the histories of those who are frequently forgotten or left out of major history books. It's a important memorial that all societies, histories, and persuasions should be recognized and admired.
To know more about Gatekeepers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2297216
#SPJ4
Why didn't China grant trading rights to the British
Answer:
because china hated the british
Explanation:
What percentages of the Voyagers on the Mayflower were actually pilgrims? What were the others called
The federal government distributed land to settlers by establishing land auctions. Who profited from the auctions
In the context of the United States, the federal government distributed land to settlers through various means, including land auctions.
During land auctions, individuals or entities who were able to successfully bid on the land parcels would profit from them. These individuals or entities could include speculators, investors, or settlers themselves who had the financial means to acquire the land through the auction process. The profits gained from land auctions would vary depending on factors such as the location, fertility, and potential value of the land.
However, it is important to note that not all settlers or individuals could participate in land auctions, as access to capital and resources was often a prerequisite for participation and successful acquisition of land
Learn more about auction process
https://brainly.com/question/32373924
#SPJ11
what is world war 2 about?
Answer:
was a global war that lasted from 1939 to 1945. It involved the vast majority of the world's countries—including all the great powers—forming two opposing military alliances: the Allies and the Axis.
Explanation:
Briefly discuss the sectional differences in the mid 1800s between the Northern and Southern states economically, politically and socially.
The sectional differences in the mid 1800s between the Northern and Southern states economically were northern states had an industrial economy and southern states had agricultural economy.
Politically, northern states believed in federal government and southern states believed in states' right.
Socially, northern states were urban and diversed and southern states were rural and hierarchy based.
In the mid 1800s, the Northern and Southern states of the United States had significant sectional differences. Economically, the Northern states had a thriving industrial economy, which was driven by manufacturing, transportation, and commerce. The Southern states, on the other hand, had an economy that was primarily based on agriculture, specifically cotton and tobacco. The use of slave labor in the South to cultivate these crops created a significant difference in the labor market.
Politically, the North and South had different ideologies on issues such as states' rights, tariffs, and slavery. The North believed in the power of the federal government to regulate commerce, which included the use of tariffs to protect Northern industries. The South, however, believed in states' rights, which meant that each state should be able to decide whether or not to allow slavery within its borders.
Socially, the Northern and Southern states were also quite different. The North had a more diverse population, including many immigrants, and was generally more urban and industrialized. The South, on the other hand, had a more rural population and was characterized by a strict social hierarchy based on race and class. Slavery was a significant factor in this hierarchy, with white slaveholders at the top and enslaved Africans and African Americans at the bottom.
These sectional differences ultimately led to the outbreak of the Civil War, as the North and South were unable to reconcile their differing views on slavery, states' rights, and other key issues.
Learn more about Southern states:
https://brainly.com/question/19486427
#SPJ11
1. One reason for the importance of the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut was that they laid the foundation for- Group of answer choices growth of representative government in the colonies a two-house legislature in state governments social freedom in colonial legislature the development of English common law in the colonies
Answer:
Option: growth of representative government in the colonies
Explanation:
The Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut closely linked toward colonial self-government.
The Mayflower Compact was a collection of rules for the self-government in America in 1620. It was the first agreement by the English settlers in the colonies. The Mayflower Compact, signed by the pilgrims and other passengers who boarded the ship from England for the New World.
The Fundamental Orders set up as a complete plan of establishing a government in which the power rested with the freemen. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut signed by the freemen of the towns of Hartford, Wethersfield, and Windsor in 1638.
How did the government of non-Axis nations respond to the issue of genocidal war crimes in Europe?
Answer:
The governments of non-Axis nations responded to the issue of genocidal war crimes in Europe in various ways, but their response was generally limited and slow.
One of the main reasons for the limited response was the lack of reliable information about the scale and nature of the atrocities being committed. While there were reports of mass killings and other war crimes coming out of Europe, many governments were skeptical of these reports and hesitant to take action based on them.
Another factor was the fact that many non-Axis nations were preoccupied with their own war efforts and did not have the resources or capacity to intervene in Europe. This was particularly true for the Soviet Union, which was heavily engaged in fighting the Germans on the Eastern Front.
That being said, there were some efforts made by non-Axis nations to respond to the issue of genocidal war crimes in Europe. These included:
1. The creation of the War Crimes Commission: In October 1942, the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union agreed to establish a War Crimes Commission to investigate and prosecute war crimes committed by the Axis powers. The commission was responsible for collecting evidence, conducting trials, and imposing punishments on individuals responsible for war crimes.
2. The issuance of the St. James Declaration: In January 1942, representatives of the Allied nations met in London and issued the St. James Declaration, which condemned the "barbarous and inhuman" treatment of civilian populations by the Axis powers and pledged to hold those responsible accountable.
3. The Nuremberg Trials: Following the end of the war in Europe, the Allies established the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg to prosecute senior Nazi leaders for war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.
Overall, while the response of non-Axis nations to the issue of genocidal war crimes in Europe was limited, there were some efforts made to hold those responsible accountable and to establish a framework for future prosecutions of war crimes.
Explanation:
Select all the correct answers. What are two reasons that the Louislana Purchase caused a debate in the United States?
People Iiving in rural areas feared that they would be forced to move west.
The Louisiana Purchase exposed the United States to the risk of a Spanish invasion.
Many politicians felt that the US Constitution did not allow such a purchase.
Military leaders believed that defending the new territory would be a burden.
Some politicians accused President Thomas jefferson of acting against his Own principles.
The constitution did not specifically give the permission to the president to make such a purchase. The citizens and politicians were afraid he was buying the land for selfish reasons.
Can someone Help me with these questions please
Brainiest answer to whoever is first
Answer:
lllllllllllooolllll no
40. When Woodrow Wilson won reelection in 1916, he received strong support from the
a. East Coast.
b. working class.
c. business community.
d. pro-war members of both parties.
e. new women voters.
Option (c) is correct. When Woodrow Wilson won reelection in 1916, he received strong support from the business community.
The 28th president of the United States, Thomas Woodrow Wilson (December 28, 1856 – February 3, 1924) was an American politician and professor who presided over the country from 1913 to 1921. Before winning the 1912 presidential election, Wilson, a Democrat, held the offices of governor of New Jersey and president of Princeton University. Wilson modified the nation's economic policies while serving as president and steered the country into World War I in 1917. Wilson was a key figure in the creation of the League of Nations, and Wilsonianism is the name given to his liberal approach to foreign affairs.
Wilson grew up in the American South during the Civil War and Reconstruction, primarily in Augusta, Georgia. Prior to becoming president of Princeton University and an advocate for progressivism in higher education, Wilson taught at a number of institutions after receiving a Ph.D. in history and political science from Johns Hopkins University. Wilson disobeyed party leaders when serving as governor of New Jersey from 1911 to 1913 and succeeded in getting a number of progressive legislation passed. At the 1912 Democratic National Convention, he rallied progressives and Southerners to his cause in order to secure the party's presidential candidature.
To know more about Woodrow Wilson visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29888956
#SPJ4
17. According to the author, which of these was the most direct result of the Dred Scott decision?
(1) The Civil War between the Union and the Confederacy
(2) Abraham Lincoln's election to the Presidency in 1860
(3) The Supreme Court overturning the Dred Scott decision
(4) The Abolition movement was sparked in the Southern states
The most direct decision of the Dred Scott decision was that the Supreme Court overturned Dred Scott decision of having a right to become an American citizen.
What happened in Dred Scott case?Dred Scott v. Sandford entails a fight for Slave right to become a citizen of United State.
The slave who resides in a free state where slavery was prohibited and was not entitled to freedom to become a Citizen. The Supreme Court rule that "No African-Americans could be a citizen in the Free state.
Hence, the most direct decision of the Dred Scott decision was that the Supreme Court overturned Dred Scott decision of having a right to become an American citizen.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Dred Scott case
brainly.com/question/12074767
Describe the impact of technology on the environment today.
Answer:
Technology has highly impacts our lives and with what we do. People use technology everyday, whether it’s tracking down a location or just simply calling someone. Without all the advance technology we have today our lives wouldn’t be as easy as it is right now. But on the other hand, the emissions, waste, and deforestation isn't good for the environment. And every year it only gets worse, therefore technology impacts the environment by changing it for the worse, (etc. landfills).
Explanation:
(Brainliest plz?)
The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about which issue?
Select one:
a. Property taxes
b. Tariffs
c. Internal improvements
d. Antislavery laws
The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about the Tariffs issue. Option B is correct.
What is the Nullification Crisis?The Nullification Crisis occurred over political disagreements about tariffs. It was a conflict that took place in the United States from 1828 to 1833, primarily between the federal government and the state of South Carolina. South Carolina, led by Vice President John C. Calhoun, claimed that the federal tariffs passed by Congress were unconstitutional and oppressive to their economy, particularly affecting the state's agricultural interests.
The state attempted to nullify or declare void the federal tariffs within its borders, leading to a standoff with the federal government under President Andrew Jackson. The crisis was ultimately resolved through a compromise tariff in 1833, which gradually reduced the rates and defused the tension between the federal government and South Carolina.
Therefore, the correct answer is b. Tariffs.
Learn more about The Nullification Crisis https://brainly.com/question/1637375
#SPJ11
What is the significance of Farquhar being able to see the Rifleman's GREY eyes How does this symbolize Farquhar's character?
Gray is the hue of Farquhar's eyes, as well as the eyes of the sentinel that watches him from the bridge.
Farquhar recalls reading that the most famous marksmen, and consequently those with the sharpest eyesight, had gray eyes, and he can see the sentinel looking ominously at him through the rifle's sights. Farquhar is the story's protagonist, and the most of the important action revolves on him and him alone. He's the only character with a formal name (not even his wife), and Bierce devotes a lot of attention to his physical description. He's a dashing Alabama plantation owner with a "well-fitting frock coat" and "a mustache and pointed beard, but no beards." He hails from a wealthy family and has the air of an aristocracy about him. Farquhar, on the other hand, is set to be hung, which allows Bierce to indulge in the dry humor that made his writing famous: "The liberal military code includes provision for hanging various sorts of individuals, and gentlemen are not exempt."
To know more about Farquhar:
https://brainly.com/question/12561785
#SPJ4
Which nations gain superpower status after World War II
Answer:
The Soviet Union & The United States
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, which of the following
British Prime Ministers aimed to invigorate the British economy by
reducing the government's role in the economy?
Group of answer choices
Ther
Margaret Thatcher, British Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990, aimed to revitalize the British economy by reducing the government's role, conducting policies that included deregulation and privatisation, commonly referred to as 'Thatcherism'.
Explanation:The British Prime Minister during the late 1970s and early 1980s who aimed to invigorate the British economy by reducing the government's role in the economy was Margaret Thatcher. She was a member of the Conservative Party and her economic policies, known as Thatcherism, focused on deregulation, privatisation of state-owned companies and reducing the power of trade unions. These initiatives were a response to Britain's period of economic hardship, and aimed to transform the economy by promoting free-market economics.
Learn more about Margaret Thatcher here:https://brainly.com/question/35888877
#SPJ3
Cosimo de' Medici was a ___ of Renaissance artists.
Answer:
Patron
Explanation:
Cosimo de Medici was a banker and politician who established the Medici family as rulers of Florence during the Renaissance. Medici families were merchants and bankers, spend much of their wealth in creating Florence as a centre of art and culture. The Platonic academy became an informal group of scholars patronized by Cosimo de Medici. The Medici family became patron of Filippo Brunelleschi and many other artists.
Why was september 11th, 2001 significant for new york city firefighters?.
Answer:
It was 9/11.
Explanation:
The twin towers were on fire.
Evaluate the extent to which trans-atlantic interactions from 1600 to 1763 contributed to maintaining continuity as well as fostering change in labor systems in the british north american colonies.
The trans-atlantic interactions led to a change in labor akin to what was seen in the West Indies. Slaves were continually being transported from Africa to replenish those who had recently.
Slaves were died due to the grueling effort needed to harvest rice and sell it to England. Due to the constant influx of slaves, South Carolina's populace in the rice-growing regions was predominately black by 1705, and this percentage increased to 80% by 1820. The way labor arrangements were used in the Middle and New England colonies did not shift all that much. These regions benefited greatly from the South Atlantic System, yet they served as just a hub for the transit of products from the Southern colonies and the West Indian islands to England.
From 1600 to 1763, transatlantic exchanges promoted both change in the sources of labor and continuity in the demand for work in the British North American colonies. From 1600 until 1763, transatlantic exchanges influenced changes in labor systems, but their fundamental elements stayed the same.
Learn more about trans-atlantic interactions here:
https://brainly.com/question/28102214
#SPJ4
Who was responsible for civil rights
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964—legislation initiated by President John F. Kennedy before his assassination—into law on July 2 of that year. King and other civil rights activists witnessed the signing.
Answer: President Lyndon Johnson
Despite Kennedy's assassination in November of 1963, his proposal culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Lyndon Johnson signed it into law just a few hours after it was passed by Congress on July 2, 1964.
Explanation: YIPPPEE
QUESTION 3: APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA-1940s TO 1960s KEY QUESTION: HOW DID THE APARTHEID LAWS VIOLATE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IN SOUTH AFRICA? SOURCE A This source deals with some of the reasons for the implementation of Apartheid and was taken from History of Southern Africa by K. Shillington. In the words of one of the architects of apartheid, H.F. Verwoerd, Minister of Bantu Administration, and later Prime Minister (1958-66) there was no place for blacks in the European community above the level of labourer. To offer blacks the same education as whites, he argued, would mislead them by showing them the green pastures of European society which they were not allowed to graze. The apartheid laws were not only the racist views of Afrikaner nationalists, but some of them also had specific advantages for capitalist employers who paid blacks low wages and made huge profits. Blacks, who formed the bulk of the working class, were kept in a subordinate position with laws such as the Industrial Reconciliation Act, Mine and Workers Act and the Civilised Labour Policy. The National Party was returned to office with greatly increased majorities in the general elections of the 1950s and 1960s. SOURCE $By use your own knowledge and explain some of the laws as mentioned in the source that kept blacks in subordinate position in the work place
The Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa by assault and torture in police custody, detention without charge or trial, and restriction orders.
The Apartheid laws affected the people of South Africa where the pass laws and Apartheid policies prohibited the Black people there from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. However, it was illegal for a Black person not to carry a passbook.
Black people could not even marry white people. Also, in South Africa they could not even set up businesses in white areas. So, this way the Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa.
Hence, Apartheid was a system of segregation and discrimination.
To learn more about the Apartheid laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/3860599
#SPJ1
What did the Supreme
Court rule in the 1964
case of Wesberry v.
Sanders?
Answer:
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population.
Explanation:
Identify ONE way in which European empires were different from the empires of Asia during the period of 1450-1750.
during the electoral campaign of 1932, which was the divisive issue between republicans and democrats?
The United States presidential election of 1932 was held on November 8, 1932, in which Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Republican President Herbert Hoover. The 1932 election was the first held during the Great Depression, and it marked a dramatic shift in the country's political alignment.
Republicans had dominated the presidency almost entirely since 1860, with the exception of two terms each won by Grover Cleveland and Woodrow Wilson. Even in 1928, Hoover easily defeated Democrat Alfred E. Smith, receiving 444 electoral votes to Smith's 87. Roosevelt's election would be the first of five consecutive Democratic presidential victories. Important for history.
To know more about presidential election of 1932 here
https://brainly.com/question/461395
#SPJ4
. Often to pay back debt, a government will do two things. One, they will cut back on the amount of money they spend. Two, they will raise taxes. Based on your understanding of the estates system, if the king raised taxes in 1789, who would have to pay them?
Answer:
I had this question before but no 1 helped me and i got an f on it :(
Explanation:
but i think it equals 30 :)!
Analysis: In Federalist Paper #51 the author says: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” What does this tell you about how he views the nature of ordinary man? What does this imply about why government is needed?
The words that it tell you about how he views the nature of ordinary ma and how it imply about why government is needed is given below
What is the Federalist Paper about?In Federalist Paper #51, the author (James Madison) argues that because people are not angels, they are not inherently good or selfless and therefore need a government to ensure that the common good is protected.
Madison believes that without government, individuals would pursue their own interests and desires without regard for the needs and well-being of others, which could lead to conflict and chaos.
This statement suggests that Madison views the nature of ordinary man as imperfect and potentially self-serving. It implies that government is necessary to regulate human behavior and ensure that society functions peacefully and justly.
Therefore, Government, according to Madison, provides a structure for resolving disputes and promoting the common good, which is essential for the stability and prosperity of a society.
Learn more about Federalist Paper from
https://brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ1
Why did the English and European armies use such harsh discipline?