How tall, in cm, is the stack of 8 cups?
How tall, in cm, is 1 cup? Explain how you determined the height of 1 cup.

Answer:

x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

4(x+2) = 16

Divide each side by 4

4/4(x+2) = 16/4

x+2 = 4

Subtract 2 from each side

x+2-2 =4-2

x =2

Answer:

x is 2

Step-by-step explanation:

parenthesis first ok ... 2 plus 2 is 4 ok?

and then 4 times 4 is 16 and the numbers haveta equal 16 so there u go mate x equals 2 yall

hope this helps

have a great day

im brooke btw

Answer:

The first 2 are definitetaletly right

Step-by-step explanation:

First off all you were not that clear.

Just plug them in

The clock minutes rotate 270 degrees in 45 minutes.

While rotating, the clock's hands are seen to move at a speed of six degrees per minute.

The number of degrees for a clock minute is solved by

60 minutes  = 360 degrees

1 minute = ?

cross multiplying

60 * ? = 360

? = 360 / 60

? = 6

hence 1 minute is 6 degrees

The formula to use to get the calculation is multiplying the number of minutes by 6

Number of degrees in 45 minutes = 45 * 6

Number of degrees in 45 minutes = 270 degrees

Learn more about clock rotation:

brainly.com/question/28741125

#SPJ1

Answer:

b = 23

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b

m - slope

b - y-intercept

Step 1: Define

y = -5x + b

G(4, 3)

Step 2: Find y-intercept b

Step 3: Write linear equation

y = -5x + 23

Answer:

The answer is y=-5x+21.5 --- B=21.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Pls Mark Brainliest

The total number of combinations of the numbers 1 through 10, using only 5 integers, that can combine to add up to 15 is the product of the number of ways in which we can choose 5 integers out of 10 and the number of ways in which we can divide these 5 integers into 4 parts such that their sum is 15. This is equal to 252 × 21 = 5292. The total number of combinations is 5292.

We can use a combination formula which is given by C(n,r) = n! / (r! * (n-r)!).Here, n is the total number of integers available (10 in this case) and r is the number of integers we are choosing (5 in this case).So, we can choose any 5 integers out of 10 in C(10,5) ways which is equal to 252.
Then, we need to find the number of ways in which these 5 integers can combine to add up to 15. We can use a stars and bars method to do that.Let's assume that we have 5 stars representing the 5 integers we chose. Now, we need to divide these stars into 4 parts using 3 bars, such that the sum of stars on the left of the first bar, between the first and second bars, between the second and third bars, and on the right of the third bar, adds up to 15.Each bar divides the stars into two groups.
So, we can say that we are placing 3 identical objects (bars) in a row of 5 identical objects (stars). Using a combination formula, the number of ways in which we can place 3 identical objects in a row of 5 identical objects is C(5+3-1, 3-1) = C(7, 2) = 21.So, the total number of combinations of the numbers 1 through 10, using only 5 integers, that can combine to add up to 15 is the product of the number of ways in which we can choose 5 integers out of 10 and the number of ways in which we can divide these 5 integers into 4 parts such that their sum is 15.

Learn more about integers here,
https://brainly.com/question/490943

#SPJ11

Answer:

C) 35

Step-by-step explanation:

1) replace x with 10

2) 4(10)-5

3) 35

Given:-

Solution:-

\( \: \)

\( \: \)

\( \: \)

\( \: \)

hope it helps! :)

A parent process calling the "wait" system call will be suspended until its child processes terminate, ensuring proper synchronization between the parent and child processes.

A parent process calling the "wait" system call will be suspended until children processes terminate.

1. The "wait" system call allows a parent process to wait for its child processes to complete.
2. When the parent process calls "wait", it is suspended until one of its child processes terminates.
3. Once a child process terminates, the parent process resumes execution.

When a parent process creates child processes, it may need to wait for them to finish before proceeding with its own execution. This is where the "wait" system call comes into play. When the parent process calls "wait", it effectively pauses its execution and waits for one of its child processes to terminate.

The "wait" system call is used to synchronize the parent process with its child processes. It allows the parent process to know when a child process has finished its execution. Once a child process terminates, the parent process is notified and resumes its execution from where it left off.

Using the "wait" system call is beneficial in scenarios where the parent process needs to collect information or perform some action after its child processes have completed. Without the "wait" system call, the parent process might continue its execution before the child processes have finished, leading to unexpected results.

In summary, a parent process calling the "wait" system call will be suspended until its child processes terminate, ensuring proper synchronization between the parent and child processes.

To more about system call visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13440584

#SPJ11

The induced emf in a region of the brain when a conducting loop is held near a person's head and the current in the loop is changed rapidly, is equal to -525 V.

The induced emf can be calculated using Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states that the emf induced in a loop of wire is equal to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop.

The magnetic flux (Φ) is equal to the product of the magnetic field (B) and the area (A) through which it passes. Therefore, the induced emf (ε) is given by:

ε = -dΦ/dt ⇒ -B dA/dt.

Where the negative sign indicates that the emf is induced in a direction that opposes the change in magnetic flux.

In this problem, the magnetic field changes at a rate of 3.00 × 10^4 T/s over an area of 1.75 × 10^-2 m^2. Therefore, the induced emf is:
Plugging in our values, we get:
E = (-3.00 10^4 T/s)(1.75 10^(-2) m^2)/(1 s)
E = -525 V

Therefore, the induced emf, in this case, is -525 V. Here, the negative sign shows that the emf is induced in a direction that opposes the change in magnetic flux

To know more about the "induced emf": https://brainly.com/question/13744192

#SPJ11

The vaIue οf n = 5 .

A mathematicaI statement knοwn as an equatiοn cοnsists οf twο aIgebraic expressiοns separated by equaI signs (=) οn either side.

It demοnstrates the equaIity οf the reIatiοnship between the printed statements οn the Ieft and right.

Left side equaIs right side in aII fοrmuIas.

Tο find the vaIues οf unknοwabIe variabIes, which stand in fοr unknοwabIe quantities, yοu can sοIve equatiοns.

A statement is nοt an equatiοn if it Iacks the equaIs sign.

When twο expressiοns have the same vaIue, a mathematicaI statement knοwn as an equatiοn wiII incIude the symbοI "equaI tο" between them.

Accοrding tο οur questiοn-

\(2 \times 10^{(n+5)} + 4.02 \times 10^5 = 2 x 10^{(n+5)} + 4.02 \times 10^n\)

Subtracting \(2 \times 10^{(n+5)\) frοm bοth sides:

\(4.02 \times 10^5 = 4.02 \times 10^n\)

Dividing bοth sides by 4.02:

\(10^5 = 10^n\)

Therefοre, n = 5.

learn more about equations click here:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

COMPLETE QUESTION-

if \((2\times10^n)+(4.02\times10^5)\), what is n?

False. The triple exponential smoothing method does consider seasonality variations in the analysis of the data, along with trend and level components, to provide accurate forecasts.

The statement is false. Triple exponential smoothing, also known as Holt-Winters method, is a time series forecasting method that incorporates trend and seasonality variations in the analysis of the data, but it does not specifically use seasonality variations.

Triple exponential smoothing extends simple exponential smoothing and double exponential smoothing by introducing an additional component for seasonality. It is commonly used to forecast data that exhibits trend and seasonality patterns. The method takes into account the level, trend, and seasonality of the time series to make predictions.

The triple exponential smoothing method utilizes three smoothing equations to update the level, trend, and seasonality components of the time series. The level component represents the overall average value of the series, the trend component captures the systematic increase or decrease over time, and the seasonality component accounts for the repetitive patterns observed within each season.

By incorporating these three components, triple exponential smoothing can capture both the trend and seasonality variations in the data, making it suitable for forecasting time series that exhibit both long-term trends and repetitive seasonal patterns.

Learn more about variations at: brainly.com/question/17287798

#SPJ11

Answer:

9.4 pound of raisin and 10.6 pound of peanut is required to make 20 pound of product

Step-by-step explanation:

The cost of raisins is $2.5 per pound and the cost of peanut per pound is $3.50.

Let r represent the number of raisin pound and p represent the number of peanut pound. Since 20 pounds of a new product that consists of peanuts and raisins need to be produced, it can be represented by the equation:

p + r = 20             (1)

The new product would cost $3.03, therefore:

3.5p + 2.5r = 3.03(20)

3.5p + 2.5r = 60.6          (2)

We have to solve equation (1) and (2) simultaneously. First multiply (1) by 2.5 to get 2.5p + 2.5r = 50. Subtract  2.5p + 2.5r = 50 from equation (2):

p = 10.6 pound

Put p = 10.6 in equation (1)

10.6 + r = 20

r = 20 - 10.6 = 9.4

r = 9.4 pound

9.4 pound of raisin and 10.6 pound of peanut is required to make 20 pound of product

Answer:

p + r = 20

\(\frac{3.50p+2.50r}{20}\) = 3.03

Step-by-step explanation:

The total cost of the product when the peanuts and raisins are combined is:

3.50p + 2.50r

To obtain the per pound cost, this expression needs to be divided by the number of total pounds, 20.

\(\frac{3.50p+2.50r}{20} =3.03\)

**KA's explanation**

If two hundred liters of a punch that contains 35% fruit juice is mixed with 300 liters of another punch and the resulting fruit punch is 20% fruit juice, then the percent of fruit juice in 300 liters of punch is calculated to be 10%.

The percentage of fruit juice in 300 liters of punch can be calculated by forming a linear equation.

A linear equation also termed a first-degree equation is an equation with one or more variables that have the highest power of one.

A linear equation for this problem can be given as:

the volume of the first punch × percentage of fruit juice in the first punch + the volume of the second punch × percentage of fruit juice in the second punch = total volume × total percentage of fruit juice

Consider x = percentage of unknown fruit juice

Now add the given values in the equation:

200 × 35 + 300(x) = 500 × 20

7000 + 300(x) = 10000

300(x) = 10000 - 7000

300(x) = 3000

x = 3000 / 300

x = 10%

Hence, the percentage of fruit juice in 300 liters of punch is calculated to be 10%.

To learn more about linear equations, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12788590

#SPJ4

Mr. Luciano and Mr. Ng can finish \(k \times J / (xy/(x+y))\) if they collaborate for k hours on the job.

If Mr. Ng can finish a task in x hours, he can finish 1/x of the task in a single hour.

In the same way, if Mr. Luciano can finish the identical task in y hours, he can finish 1/y of the task in an hour.

They can finish (1/x + 1/y) of the task in an hour if they collaborate.

Let J represent the entire task that needs to be accomplished.

The amount of work produced if they collaborate for k hours is equal to their collective work rate times the number of hours they collaborated:

Because they are cooperating, the work rates are combined together.

To determine the actual quantity of work accomplished, we multiply by J.

If we condense this phrase, we get:

Amount of work finished\(= (1/x + 1/y) \times k \times J\)

The work rates are added, as you can see.

For similar question on work.

https://brainly.com/question/25922351

#SPJ11

Answer:

\(\frac{11}{8}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

3(2k+3)=6-(3k-5)

6k +9=6-3k+5

6k+3k=6+5

8k=11

k=\(\frac{11}{8}\)

Answer: I think it is k=2/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the original cost of the jacket be x.

Now, saying that one-third of the original cost of the jacket is $34, is mathematically equivalent to:

Now we have to solve the resulting equation in order to obtain the value of x

This is done as follows:

Therefore, the original cost of the jacket is $102

The probability of selecting a card with no green faces is 3/11. The probability that the other side of a green card isn't green is 1/11.

The probability of an event is determined by the number of favorable outcomes divided by the total number of possible outcomes.

Let's analyze each event to determine the probability.
A. Probability of selecting a card with no green faces:
To find this probability, we need to count the number of cards that don't have any green faces and divide it by the total number of cards.
From the given information, cards 4, 8, and 9 don't have any green faces.
Total cards without green faces: 3
Total number of cards: 11 (cards 1 to 11)
So, the probability of selecting a card with no green faces is 3/11.
B. Probability of selecting a card with a red face:
To find this probability, we need to count the number of cards that have at least one red face and divide it by the total number of cards.
From the given information, cards 3, 4, 9, and 10 have at least one red face.
Total cards with a red face: 4
Total number of cards: 11 (cards 1 to 11)
So, the probability of selecting a card with a red face is 4/11.
C. Probability of selecting a card with the same color on both faces:
To find this probability, we need to count the number of cards that have the same color on both faces and divide it by the total number of cards.
From the given information, cards 1, 4, 9, and 11 have the same color on both faces.
Total cards with the same color on both faces: 4
Total number of cards: 11 (cards 1 to 11)
So, the probability of selecting a card with the same color on both faces is 4/11.
D. Probability that the other side of a red card is also red:
To find this probability, we need to count the number of red cards and divide it by the total number of cards, then multiply it by the probability that the other side is also red.
From the given information, cards 3, 4, 9, and 10 are red.
Total red cards: 4
Total number of cards: 11 (cards 1 to 11)
The probability that the other side is also red is 2/4 because there are 2 red-red cards (cards 3 and 9) out of the 4 red cards.
So, the probability that the other side of a red card is also red is (4/11) * (2/4) = 2/11.
E. Probability that the other side of a green card isn't green:
To find this probability, we need to count the number of green cards and divide it by the total number of cards, then subtract the probability that the other side is also green.
From the given information, cards 1, 5, and 6 are green.
Total green cards: 3
Total number of cards: 11 (cards 1 to 11)
The probability that the other side is also green is 2/3 because there are 2 green-green cards (cards 1 and 5) out of the 3 green cards.
So, the probability that the other side of a green card isn't green is (3/11) * (1 - 2/3) = 1/11.
For more related questions on probability:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ8

Over four days, Kasey covered .75 miles per day for a total of 3 miles. Andrew covered .6 miles per day for a total of 2.4 miles. Hence, Kasey walked .6 miles farther than Andrew.

This is a simple problem involving multiplication and subtraction to determine distance. First, to find out how far Kasey walked in total, we multiply the amount she walks each day (.75 miles) by the number of days she walked (4). This gives us 3 miles (4*.75). Similarly, to find out how far Andrew walked in total, we multiply the amount he walks each day (.6 miles) by the number of days he walked (4). This gives us 2.4 miles (4*.6).

To find out how much farther Kasey walked than Andrew, we simply subtract Andrew's total distance from Kasey's total distance. So, 3 miles - 2.4 miles = .6 miles. Therefore, Kasey walked .6 miles farther than Andrew did over the four days.

https://brainly.com/question/31575023

#SPJ2

To graph a rational function example, start by writing the equation in the form y = (ax + b)/(cx + d).

Then, plot the points where the denominator equals zero (when x = -d/c). These points are called vertical asymptotes.Next, plot the points where the numerator equals zero (when x = -b/a). These are called horizontal asymptotes.Finally, plot points between the vertical and horizontal asymptotes to graph the rational function.Plotting the points between the vertical and horizontal asymptotes will allow you to see the shape of the graph. Start by plotting points on either side of the vertical and horizontal asymptotes. Then, plot points at evenly spaced x-values between the vertical and horizontal asymptotes. For example, if the vertical asymptote is at x=-d/c, and the horizontal asymptote is at x=-b/a, you can plot points at x=-1.5d/c, x=-0.5d/c, x=-1.5b/a, and x=-0.5b/a. By plotting these points and connecting them with a smooth curve, you can graph the rational function.

Learn more about graph here

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ4

The difference lies in the comparison made: critical values in the z-test using rejection region(s) and the P-value in the z-test using a P-value. The choice between the two approaches depends on the nature of the population and the specific hypothesis being tested.

The correct answer is (d): In the z-test using rejection region(s), the test statistic is compared with critical values. The z-test using a P-value compares the P-value with the level of significance alpha.

The z-test is a statistical test used to assess whether a sample mean or proportion significantly differs from a hypothesized population mean or proportion. The difference between the z-test for mu (population mean) using rejection region(s) and the z-test for p (population proportion) using a P-value lies in the approach used to make the inference.

In the z-test using rejection region(s), the test statistic (calculated from the sample) is compared with critical values based on the chosen level of significance alpha. The critical values are determined from the standard normal distribution or a z-table, and if the test statistic falls within the rejection region (beyond the critical values), the null hypothesis is rejected.

On the other hand, in the z-test for p using a P-value, the test statistic is compared with the P-value. The P-value represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one obtained, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If the P-value is smaller than the chosen level of significance alpha, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the difference lies in the comparison made: critical values in the z-test using rejection region(s) and the P-value in the z-test using a P-value. The choice between the two approaches depends on the nature of the population and the specific hypothesis being tested.

Learn more  about critical values

https://brainly.com/question/14040224

#SPJ11

The value of x as required to be determined in the given task content is; 3.

It follows from the task content that the value of x is required to be determined in the given task content.

By observation; the triangles formed by the parallel lines and the common vertex they share are similar triangles.

On this note, the ratio of their corresponding sides are equal and hence; we have that;

15 / (15 + x) = 10 / (10 + 2)

(15 × 12) = 10 (15 + x)

180 - 150 = 10x

30 = 10x

x = 3.

Consequently, it follows that the value of x as required is; 3.

Read more on similar triangles ratio;

https://brainly.com/question/31529028

#SPJ1

Evidence against OLS assumption #1, which states that the conditional distribution of the error term has a mean of zero, can be found in options C and D.

These options indicate that the covariance or correlation between intelligence and education is not zero, suggesting a potential violation of the assumption.

OLS assumption #1 states that the conditional distribution of the error term (u) given the explanatory variable (Education) has a mean of zero. In other words, it assumes that there is no systematic relationship between the unobserved factors affecting wage (captured by the error term) and the explanatory variable after accounting for the observed variable (Education).

Option C provides evidence against OLS assumption #1 by stating that the covariance between intelligence and education is not equal to zero. This suggests that there is a systematic relationship between unobserved intelligence and observed education, potentially violating the assumption.

Option D also provides evidence against OLS assumption #1 by stating that the correlation between intelligence and education is not equal to zero. A non-zero correlation implies a systematic relationship between the two variables, indicating a potential violation of the assumption.

On the other hand, options A and B do not provide evidence against OLS assumption #1. A zero correlation (option A) or equal expected values of intelligence and education (option B) do not necessarily contradict the assumption that the conditional distribution of the error term has a mean of zero.

In conclusion, options C and D provide evidence against OLS assumption #1, indicating a potential violation of the assumption based on the covariance or correlation between intelligence and education.

Learn more about covariance  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28135424

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6) 4

7) 28

Answer:

5xy^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Jenna and Mia arrived at the same answer because both the methods they have adopted are correct.

Given solution of a question done by two people.

Jenna's method

5(30+4)

(5)(30)+(5)(4)

150+20=170

Mia's method

5(30+4)

5(34)=170

We are required to find why they have achieved at the same answer.

Jenna and Mia have achieved at the same answer because they both have adopted the right method.Jenna's method is the equation in its simplest form. Addition of that is easily understood. While Mia's method is just valid as Jenna's some people may have trouble remembering the steps of multiplication within parantheses as well as being able to look at large multiplication problem and automatically knowing the answer or being able to get the answer as fast as simple addition.

Hence Jenna and Mia arrived at the same answer because both the methods they have adopted are correct.

Learn more about multiplication at https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ1

An equation to represent the given scenario is 1/2 +x +1/6 =1 and the part of pizza ate by Jill is 1/3.

Given that, Jack ate 1/2 of the pizza and 1/6 of the pizza was left.

Let the part of pizza ate by Jill be x.

Here, the equation is 1/2 +x +1/6 =1

(1/2 + 1/6) +x=1

(3/6 + 1/6)+x=1

4/6 +x=1

x=1- 2/3

x=1/3

Therefore, an equation to represent the given scenario is 1/2 +x +1/6 =1 and the part of pizza ate by Jill is 1/3.

To learn more about the fraction visit:

brainly.com/question/1301963.

#SPJ1

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Julio's number is 34.

Step-by-step explanation:

34-14=20×-3=-60

Answer:

34

Step-by-step explanation:

divde -60 by negative -3 and add 14

-60÷-3=20 20+14 =34 you can check by subtracting 14 from 34 and then dividing the answer by 3. 34-14=20 20÷-3 is -60

Answer:

136.99

Step-by-step explanation:

Đây là một câu hỏi dễ chỉ cần sử dụng máy tính

Part a:  What quantity order size would minimize the total annual inventory cost? Total Annual Inventory Cost = Annual Ordering Cost + Annual Carrying Cost At minimum Total Annual Inventory Cost, the formula for the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is used. EOQ formula is given below: EOQ = sqrt((2DS)/H)Where, D = Annual DemandS = Ordering cost

The company should place an order for 168 boxes at a time in order to minimize the total annual inventory cost.Part b: Determine the minimum total annual inventory cost.Using the EOQ, the company can calculate the minimum total annual inventory cost. The Total Annual Inventory Cost formula is:Total Annual Inventory Cost = Annual Ordering Cost + Annual Carrying CostAnnual Ordering Cost = (D/EOQ) × S = (16,800/168) × $60 = $6,000Annual Carrying Cost = (EOQ/2) × H = (168/2) × $30 = $2,520Total Annual Inventory Cost = $6,000 + $2,520 = $8,520Therefore, the minimum Total Annual Inventory Cost would be $8,520.Part c: Would you recommend the manager to use your quantity from part (a) rather than 300 boxes? Justify your answer (by determining the total annual inventory cost for 300 boxes)

To know more about Inventory visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31146932

#SPJ11