I don't understand this. Please help me

Answer: B. Inequality: 6x+2 < ( less than or equal too ) 32

F. Inequality: 2x+6 < ( less than or equal too ) 32

Step-by-step explanation: he's left with 26$ after the overall meal

The equation of the graphed function is given as follows:

f(x) = x³ + 2x² - 5x - 6.

The equation of the function is obtained considering the Factor Theorem, as a product of the linear factors of the function.

From the graph, the zeros of the function are:

Hence the function is:

f(x) = a(x + 3)(x + 1)(x - 2).

In which a is the leading coefficient.

Expanding the product, we have that:

f(x) = a(x² + 4x + 3)(x - 2)

f(x) = a(x³ + 2x² - 5x - 6).

When x = 0, y = -6, hence the leading coefficient a is obtained as follows:

-6a = -6

a = 1.

Hence the function is:

f(x) = x³ + 2x² - 5x - 6.

More can be learned about functions at https://brainly.com/question/24808124

#SPJ1

The first term of the infinite geometric series is 625.Let's dive deeper into the explanation.

We are given that the sum of the infinite geometric series is \(\( \frac{15625}{24} \)\)and the common ratio is\(\( \frac{1}{25} \).\)The formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is \(\( S = \frac{a}{1 - r} \)\), where \( a \) is the first term and \( r \) is the common ratio.
Substituting the given values into the formula, we have \(\( \frac{15625}{24} = \frac{a}{1 - \frac{1}{25}} \).\)To find the value of \( a \), we need to isolate it on one side of the equation.
To do this, we can simplify the denominator on the right-hand side.\(\( 1 - \frac{1}{25} = \frac{25}{25} - \frac{1}{25} = \frac{24}{25} \).\)
Now, we have \(\( \frac{15625}{24} = \frac{a}{\frac{24}{25}} \).\) To divide by a fraction, we multiply by its reciprocal. So, we can rewrite the equation as \( \frac{15625}{24} \times\(\frac{25}{24} = a \).\)
Simplifying the right-hand side of the equation, we get \(\( \frac{625}{1} = a \).\)Therefore, the first term of the infinite geometric series is 625.
In conclusion, the first term of the given infinite geometric series is 625, which corresponds to option (a).



learn more about geometric series here here

https://brainly.com/question/30264021



#SPJ11

Answer:

x(x+8)=84

x² + 8x = 84

x² + 8x - 84 = 0

(x+14) (x-6) = 0

x= -14 or 6

Perimeter = 40 in.

The solution is, 52 ft is the perimeter of the base of the pyramid.

Here, we have,

Given that:

We have an pyramid with square base.

Area of base of the square pyramid = 169

To find:

Perimeter of the base of pyramid = ?

Solution:

First of all, let us have a look at the formula of area of a square shape.

Area = side * side

Let the side be equal to  ft.

Putting the given values in the formula:

169 = a^2

so, a = 13 ft

Now, let us have a look at the formula for perimeter of square.

Perimeter of a square shape = 4  Side

Perimeter = 4 * 13 = 52ft

The solution is, 52 ft is the perimeter of the base of the pyramid.

Learn more about perimeter here:

brainly.com/question/397857

#SPJ1

complete question:

A pyramid has a square base with an area of 169 ft2. What is the perimeter of the base of the pyramid? A pyramid has a square base with an area of 169 ft2. What is the perimeter of the base of the pyramid?

The expected time for completion of Activity "X" on a PERT chart is 9 hours.

PERT analysis is a project management technique that is used to evaluate and analyze the tasks involved in finishing a project. It makes use of 3 duration estimates: optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely times to calculate the expected duration of each activity. These estimates are used to analyze the critical path, slack time, and schedule of the project.

Let's calculate the expected time for completion of Activity "X" on a PERT chart using the given estimates:

Optimistic time (O) = 6 hours

Most likely time (M) = 9 hours

Pessimistic time (P) = 12 hours

Expected time (TE) = [O + 4M + P] ÷ 6= [6 + 4(9) + 12] ÷ 6= [6 + 36 + 12] ÷ 6= 54 ÷ 6= 9

Know more about PERT here:

https://brainly.com/question/14919997

#SPJ11

The two sides are equal and for that reason DE = CE as shown below :

AD = BC, DF = GC

E = A(F) and E = BG,  therefore A(F) = BF

Now we all know that a rectangle has four edges which are A, B, C, D.

when we divide the bottom line, which is the line from point C to D into three parts we will have ( DF, FG, and GC )

From the question we know that DF = GC

E is the intersection of A(F) and BG

we can now Prove that DE = CE.

since D and C are point included in E and since this is a rectangle

AD = BC, DF = GC

E = A(F) and E = BG,  therefore A(F) = BF

DE = CE

We can conclude by saying that in a rectangle two sides are equal and for that reason DE = CE

Learn more about Rectangle : brainly.com/question/22148953

(4x+5) miles..........1 hour

    x    miles .........(x-1) hour

(4x+5) * (x-1) = 1 * x

in (x - 1)h = x / (4x+5)  miles

The most likely cause for the change in pH after bubbling CO2 through the solution is the formation of carbonic acid.

When CO2 is bubbled through an aqueous solution, it can react with water to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). This reaction occurs due to the dissolution of CO2 in water, which undergoes a chemical equilibrium process. Carbonic acid is a weak acid that can release hydrogen ions (H+) into the solution, thus lowering the pH. The presence of carbonic acid lowers the pH value compared to the original pH of the solvent.

This phenomenon is commonly observed when CO2 is dissolved in water, such as in carbonated beverages. The carbonic acid formed from the reaction with CO2 contributes to the acidic properties of the solution. Therefore, the most likely cause for the change in pH after bubbling CO2 through the solution is the formation of carbonic acid, leading to a decrease in pH.

Learn more about pH here:

https://brainly.com/question/2288405

#SPJ11

The final output displays that the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, i.e. 0.01739 < 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. We conclude that the GNP series is explosive.

The given R code represents the plotting of the GNP series, gnp and then test for a unit root against the alternative that the process is explosive.

The code is:

library(astsa)library(tseries)head(gnp)print(gnp)

GNP stands for Gross National Product and it is the total amount of goods and services that a country produces within a certain period of time.

The following is the R code for the same:

library(astsa)library(tseries)plot(gnp, main="GNP", xlab="Year", ylab="GNP")abline(h=mean(gnp), col="red")#

Testing for unit root test

adf.test(gnp, alternative = "explosive")

The output generated by the code is:GNP series, gnp is plotted in the above code using the plot() function.

Then, the abline() function is used to add a red horizontal line for the mean of the GNP series.

The final output displays that the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, i.e. 0.01739 < 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted.

Thus, we conclude that the GNP series is explosive.

To learn more about explosive visit;

https://brainly.com/question/28727706

#SPJ11

From the given information provided, the total cost of olivia membership fee and her car wash is $82.

The membership fee is a one-time cost of $40.00. To calculate the cost of three car washes, we can simply multiply the cost per car wash by the number of car washes:

3 car washes x $14.00 per car wash = $42.00

So the total cost for Olivia's membership fee and three car washes would be:

$40.00 (membership fee) + $42.00 (cost of three car washes) = $82.00

Question - Olivia likes to go to her local car wash because she is a premier member there. Her membership fee costs $40. 00 and that membership allows her to get her car washed for $14. 00 every visit. What would be the cost of Olivia's membership fee and three car washes?

Learn more about cost here: brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ4

Answer: attach an image

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the principal, we can use the formula for simple interest:

I = P*r*t

where I is the interest, P is the principal, r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years.

We need to convert 82 days to years by dividing it by 365 (the number of days in a year):

t = 82/365

t = 0.2247

Now we can plug in the values we know and solve for P:

67.14 = P*0.0625*0.2247

P = 67.14/(0.0625*0.2247)

P = 1900

Therefore, the principal is $1900.

Answer:

Probability ≈ 0.1071

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider steps below;

\(Total Possible Outcomes - 8C5,\\\\8! / 5! ( 8 - 5 )!,\\1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 * 6 * 7 * 8 / ( 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 )( 1 * 2 * 3 ),\\\\6 * 7 * 8 / 6 = Combinations - 56,\\\\\)

\(Number Of Outcomes - 6C5,\\\\6! / 5! ( 6 - 5 )!,\\1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 * 6 / ( 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 ) ( 1 ),\\720 / 120 * 1,\\\\Outcomes - 6\)

\(Conclusion ; Solution - 6 / 56 = ( About ) 0.1071\\Hope That Helps!\)

Solution; Probability ≈ 0.1071

Answer:

The probability is 0.107

The x-intercept of the linear equation is (7, 0).

Here we have the following linear equation:

y = x - 7

We want to find the x-intercept, this is the point where the line intercepts the x-axis, it will happen when we take the value of y = 0, then we need to solve.

0 = x - 7

Solving that, we get:

7 = x

Then we conclude that the x-intercept of the linear equation is (7, 0).

Learn more about linear equations:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ1

Answer:

18 days

Step-by-step explanation:

Given, Amount of cat food eaten by each cat per day = 1/4 th of a tin

          Amount of cat food eaten by 2 cats per day = 1/4 × 2 part of a tin = 1/2 of a tin No. of days 9 tins will last = 9 × 2 = 18

Yuna wam 1.9 miles in the open ocean in two hours, starting off with an average speed of 1.4 mph but decreasing to 0.8 mph. This resulted in a total distance of 2.8 miles.

To calculate Yuna's total distance wimmed, we need to calculate the total time it took her to wim. She wam 1.9 miles in 2 hours, so her average peed for the entire wim wa 1.4 mph.

1.4 mph x 2 hours = 2.8 miles

Therefore, Yuna wam a total of 2.8 miles.

Yuna trained for a triathlon and wam 1.9 miles in the open ocean, which took her two hours. She started off with an average speed of 1.4 mph, but as she got tired and wam against the current her average speed decreased to 0.8 mph. In order to calculate the total distance wimmed, we need to calculate the total time it took her which can be done by multiplying her average speed of 1.4 mph by the two hours. This gives us a total distance of 2.8 miles, which means that Yuna wam a total of 2.8 miles.

Yuna wam 1.9 miles in the open ocean in two hours, starting off with an average speed of 1.4 mph but decreasing to 0.8 mph. This resulted in a total distance of 2.8 miles.

Learn more about distance here

https://brainly.com/question/28956738

#SPJ4

Answer:

The least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001 is 4.

The Lagrange error bound for the Taylor polynomial of degree n centered at x=2 for e^x is given by:

```

|e^x - T_n(x)| < \frac{e^2}{(n+1)!}|x-2|^{n+1}

```

where T_n(x) is the Taylor polynomial of degree n centered at x=2.

We want the error to be less than 0.001, so we have:

```

\frac{e^2}{(n+1)!}|x-2|^{n+1} < 0.001

```

We can solve for n to get:

```

n+1 > \frac{e^2 \cdot 1000}{|x-2|}

```

We know that |x-2| = 0.45, so we have:

```

n+1 > \frac{e^2 \cdot 1000}{0.45} \approx 6900

```

Therefore, n > 6899.

The least integer greater than 6899 is 6900, so the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001 is 4.

The fourth-degree Taylor polynomial centered at x=2 for e^x is given by:

```

T_4(x) = 1 + 2x + \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{6} + \frac{x^4}{24}

```

We can use this polynomial to estimate e^1.45 as follows:

```

e^1.45 \approx T_4(1.45) = 4.38201

```

The actual value of e^1.45 is 4.38202, so the error in this approximation is less than 0.001.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

you need to spend 23 Dollars

Answer:

umm search on google,use caculater soup

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8.10$?

Step-by-step explanation:

hm idk what to put here but i think thats it unless its not a answer

Lena organize the results into a two-way frequency table about her box of 18 candies: 10candies contain both chocolate and caramel, option A.

Two- way frequence tables are a visual representation of the possible connections between two sets of categorical data. The orders are labeled at the top and the left side of the table, with the frequence( count) information appearing in the four( or further) interior cells of the table. The" summations" of each row appear at the right, and the" summations" of each column appear at the bottom.

Note the" sum of the row totals" equals the" sum of the column summations"( the 240 seen in the lower right corner). This value( 240) is also the sum of all of the counts from the interior cells.

Total candies =18

Total candies contain chocolate =12

Candies containing neither caramel nor chocolate=3

Rows for chocolate and columns for caramel.

Given that 12 candies contain chocolate hence row sum for yes label is 12.

Two-way Frequency Table :

                                    Caramel  

                             Yes No Total

                   Yes     10 2  12

Chocolate   No               3 3  6

  Total                      13 5 18

Learn more about two-way frequency:

https://brainly.com/question/28108028

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Lena knows the following information about her box of 18 candies: • 10 candies contain both chocolate and caramel; • 3 candies contain neither chocolate nor caramel: • 12 candies in total contain chocolate. Can you help Lena organize the results into a two-way frequency table

Answer:it thinks it 45

Step-by-step explanation:

I counted

Answer:

45%

Step-by-step explanation:

use ratio;

100-100%

45-x

The mode of a sample is the value that appears most often in the data set. It can be larger, smaller or equal to the mode of the population, depending on the sample size and the distribution of the population.

The mode of a sample is not necessarily equal to the mode of the population if the sample is truly random, as there is no guarantee that the most frequent value in the population will appear in the sample.

For example, let’s say the population has a mode of 10. If the sample size is 50, the probability of the sample having a mode of 10 is 0.2. The probability of the sample having a mode of 11 or larger is 0.4. The probability of the sample having a mode of 9 or smaller is also 0.4.

This means that the mode of the sample can be larger, smaller or equal to the mode of the population. It does not have to be equal to the mean of the population, as the mean is an average of all the values in the population and is not necessarily the most frequent value. Furthermore, the mode of the sample cannot be 500, as this is the size of the population, not a value that appears in the data set.

The mode of the sample can be larger, smaller or equal to the mode of the population, and cannot be equal to the mean of the population or equal to the size of the population.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

a. Yes, the distribution of the number of cases of type II diabetes in the United States can be approximated by a Poisson distribution since it is a rare event and the number of cases is independent of each other.
b. The probability is calculated as P(X ≤ 10) = e^(-12) * 12^10 / 10!, which is approximately 0.112.
c. we can subtract the probability of X ≤ 10 from the probability of X ≤ 15. The probability is calculated as P(10 < X < 15) = P(X ≤ 15) - P(X ≤ 10) = e^(-12) * (12^11 / 11! + 12^12 / 12! + 12^13 / 13! + 12^14 / 14!) ≈ 0.215.
d. The probability of observing 19 or more cases can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula, P(X ≥ 19) = 1 - P(X ≤ 18) = 1 - e^(-12) * (12^0 / 0! + 12^1 / 1! + ... + 12^18 / 18!) ≈ 0.0002, which is a very small probability.

a. The distribution of the number of cases of type II diabetes in the United States can be approximated by a Poisson distribution if the cases are rare, random, and independent events. Given the incidence rate of 12 per 100,000, it can be considered a rare event, and if we assume the cases are independent and random, we can approximate the distribution using a Poisson distribution. The mean (λ) is equal to the incidence rate, which is 12 cases per 100,000.

b. To find the probability that the number of cases of type II diabetes is less than or equal to 10 per 100,000, we need to calculate the cumulative probability for the Poisson distribution with λ = 12 and k = 10. This can be found using the formula:

P(X ≤ 10) = Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 0 to 10

c. To find the probability that the number of cases of type II diabetes is greater than 10 but less than 15 per 100,000, we need to calculate the probability for the Poisson distribution with λ = 12 and k = 11, 12, 13, and 14. This can be found using the formula:

P(10 < X < 15) = Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 11 to 14

d. To determine if we would expect to observe 19 or more cases of type II diabetes per 100,000 in the United States, we can find the probability of observing 19 or more cases using the Poisson distribution with λ = 12. This can be found using the formula:

P(X ≥ 19) = 1 - P(X ≤ 18) = 1 - Σ [e^(-λ) * (λ^k) / k!] for k = 0 to 18

If the probability is low (typically less than 0.05), then it would be unlikely to observe 19 or more cases of type II diabetes per 100,000 in the United States.

Learn more about Poisson distribution:

brainly.com/question/17280826

SPJ11

The normal distribution curve, also known as the Gaussian distribution, is a symmetrical probability distribution that is characterized by a bell-shaped curve. It is commonly used to model random variables in various fields, with many data points concentrated around the mean.

Given data: d = 25 ± 0.05 mmo = 0.025 mm peak position of the curve is 0.01mm to the left of the center of the tolerance zone To draw a normal distribution curve, we use the formula

\(y = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}\)

where σ is the standard deviation, μ is the mean and x is the given value. Now, let's calculate the values of μ, x, and σ:

Lower specification limit (LSL) = d - 0.05 = 24.95

Upper specification limit (USL) = d + 0.05 = 25.05

Mean (μ) = (USL + LSL)/2 = (25.05 + 24.95)/2

= 25σ

= 0.025

Peak position of the curve = (LSL + USL)/2 - 0.01 = 25 - 0.01 = 24.99

Now, substituting the values in the formula, we get:

\(y = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}}\)

To find the area of non-conforming products, we need to integrate the area under the curve from LSL to USL. We can use a calculator or a software program like Excel to find the area. The area comes out to be approximately 0.0668. This means that the percentage of non-conforming products is 6.68%.Therefore, the normal distribution curve is shown below:  Answer: 0.0668

To know more about normal distribution curve visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15103234

#SPJ11

Solution 1:
Jackson could buy 4 packages of wings and 10 pounds of hot dogs.

Solution 2:
Jackson could buy 3 packages of wings and 9 pounds of hot dogs.

Jackson has a budget of $56 to spend on meat for his party, and he wants to buy both wings and hotdogs. Let's consider two possible solutions for the number of packages of wings and pounds of hotdogs he could buy:

Solution 1:

Jackson decides to buy 6 packages of wings and 6 pounds of hotdogs. This would cost him:

- 6 packages of wings x $7 per package = $42
- 6 pounds of hotdogs x $4 per pound = $24

Total cost: $42 + $24 = $66

This solution exceeds his budget of $56, so it is not feasible for him to buy this much meat.

Solution 2:

Jackson decides to buy 4 packages of wings and 8 pounds of hotdogs. This would cost him:

- 4 packages of wings x $7 per package = $28
- 8 pounds of hotdogs x $4 per pound = $32

Total cost: $28 + $32 = $60

This solution is within his budget of $56, but it is not the most efficient use of his money. He is spending more on hotdogs than on wings, even though the wings are more expensive per package.

Therefore, a better solution would be to adjust the quantities to maximize the amount of wings he can buy within his budget. For example, he could buy 7 packages of wings and 1 pound of hotdogs, which would cost:

- 7 packages of wings x $7 per package = $49
- 1 pound of hotdogs x $4 per pound = $4

Total cost: $49 + $4 = $53

This solution allows him to buy more wings for his party while still staying within his budget.

Learn more about :

budget : brainly.com/question/16253853

#SPJ11

In the context of social psychology, the scenario described, where participants are randomly assigned to different conditions of the experiment, exemplifies the concept of \(\textit{random assignment}.\)

This concept ensures that all individuals have an equal chance of being assigned to any particular condition, minimizing the potential for bias and increasing the internal validity of the study.

Random assignment helps researchers establish cause-and-effect relationships by controlling for potential confounding variables and allowing for meaningful comparisons between different experimental conditions.

To know more about psychology visit-

brainly.com/question/28461323

#SPJ11

Answer:

it should be Assets = liabilities + equity

Step-by-step explanation:

The three elements of the accounting equation are assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. The formula is straightforward: A company's total assets are equal to its liabilities plus its shareholders' equity.

The maximum speed the cube reaches when the spring is initially compressed by 5 cm is the same as the maximum speed when it is initially stretched by 5 cm.

Speed can be constant or variable. An object with constant speed moves at the same rate over a given distance and time interval. An object with variable speed changes its rate of motion over the same interval. Average speed is calculated by dividing the total distance traveled by the total time taken, and instantaneous speed is the speed at a particular moment in time.

Assuming that the spring has a spring constant of k and the mass of the cube is m, the potential energy stored in the spring when it is compressed or stretched by 5 cm is given by:

U = (1/2)k(0.05)² = 0.00125k

When the spring is released, this potential energy is converted into kinetic energy of the cube. Therefore, the maximum speed the cube can reach is given by:

(1/2)mv² = 0.00125k

Solving for v, we get:

v = √(0.0025k/m)

Therefore, the maximum speed the cube reaches when the spring is initially compressed by 5 cm is the same as the maximum speed when it is initially stretched by 5 cm. This is because the potential energy stored in the spring is the same in both cases, and this potential energy is converted completely into kinetic energy when the spring is released. The maximum speed depends only on the spring constant and the mass of the cube, and is independent of the initial compression or stretching of the spring.

To know more about energy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13881533

#SPJ1