I need help on this math question

Answer:

look at attachment

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

There is a 11.36 pounds difference between Tray's weight on Earth and on Saturn

Step-by-step explanation:

142 × .92 = 130.64

142-130.64= 11.36

Answer:

x=10

Step-by-step explanation:

By the Trapezoid Midsegment Theorem, the midsegment of a Trapezoid is 1/2(the sum of the 2 bases.

4x-20=1/2(23+17)

4x-20=1/2(40)

4x-20=20

4x=40

x=10

The radius of the oatmeal container is 0.2 inches.

The surface area of the plastic is 0.08π square inches

The base and lid are made of plastic and have a radius of R.

The base and lid have a combined surface area of:

πr² + πr² = 2πr² square inches

The total surface area of the oatmeal container is 40 square inches.

The surface area of the cardboard is 16πr square inches and the surface area of the plastic is 2πr² square inches.

Thus, we have the equation:

40 = 16πr + 2πr²

We can solve for R as follows:

16πr + 2πr² = 40

2πr^2 + 16πr - 40 = 0

2πr^2 + 20πr - 4πr - 40 = 0

20r(πr + 2) - 4(πr + 2) = 0

(20r - 4)(πr + 2) = 0

20r - 4 = 0 or πr + 2 = 0

20r = 4 or πr = -2

r = 0.2

Thus, the radius of the oatmeal container is 0.2 inches.

The surface area of the plastic is 2πr² = 2π(0.2)² = 0.08π square inches

Learn more about area on

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

Answer:

3:4

Step-by-step explanation:

12:16

divide by 4 on both sides

3:4

can't simplify any further

so therefore the answer is 3:4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1-g

2-h

3-k

4-n

5-f

6-l

7-d

8-i

9-c

10-m

11-p

12-b

13-r

14-q

15-o

16-a

17-e

18-j

To prove the identity cos x + cos y = 2 cos((x+y)/2) cos((x-y)/2), we can use the sum-to-product and double angle identities.

(a) Applying the sum-to-product identity for cosines:

cos x + cos y = 2 cos((x+y)/2) cos((x-y)/2)

(b) Expanding the right side using the double angle identity:

2 cos((x+y)/2) cos((x-y)/2) = 2 [cos²((x+y)/2) - sin²((x-y)/2)]

Now, we need to prove that cos x + cos y is equal to the expanded expression on the right side.

(c) Using the double angle identity:

cos x + cos y = cos x + cos x = 2 cos²(x/2) - 1 + 2 cos²(y/2) - 1

Simplifying: = 2 (cos²(x/2) + cos²(y/2)) - 2

Using the Pythagorean identity cos²θ + sin²θ = 1, we can rewrite:

= 2 (1 - sin²(x/2) + 1 - sin²(y/2)) - 2

= 4 - 2sin²(x/2) - 2sin²(y/2) - 2

= 2 (2 - sin²(x/2) - sin²(y/2)) - 2

= 2 (cos²(x/2) + cos²(y/2)) - 2

= 2 [cos²((x+y)/2) - sin²((x-y)/2)]

Therefore, we have shown that cos x + cos y is equal to 2 cos((x+y)/2) cos((x-y)/2), proving the identity.

LEARN MORE ABOUT double angle identities here: brainly.com/question/30772145

#SPJ11

The value that the linear equation predicts for the year 2001 is 4652.15

The discrepancy between the actual and anticipated value is 2173.85

Given data;

Here, we present the dataset from the United Nations, which contains information on the number of kilowatt-hours of wind energy generated globally. The data set provides statistics on the US for 25 years, from 1990 to 2014, in millions of kilowatt-hours.

The linear equation for the first 11 years of data, from 1990 to 2000, must be determined.

To determine how much the actual value and anticipated value for the year 2001 differ in Quantity, we must first forecast the value for the year 2001 using our fitted equation with y-intercept.

It will be written as y = m(x) + c.

where,

The dependent variable is y. (in our example is quantity)

The independent variable is x. (in our example is the year)

'm' is equal to the slope of the variable X.

'C' is a constant.

The fitted equation is provided as follows:

Quantity = 186.87 (year) - 369274.72

Now that the value for the year 2001 has been provided,

Quantity = -1868.87 -369274.72 

Quantity = 4652.15

The value that the linear equation predicts for the year 2001 is 4652.15.

The precise figure for 2001 is 6806.

For the year 2001, the discrepancy between the actual and anticipated values is

6806 - 4652.15 = 2173.85

The distinction is 2173.85.

(2173.85/6806)*100 is the percentage difference.

As a result, the difference between the actual value and the forecasted value for the year 2001 is 31.94%.

Hence,

The value that the linear equation predicts for the year 2001 is 4652.15

The discrepancy between the actual and anticipated value is 2173.85

To learn more about intercept click here:

brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ4

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(4,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) If the given graph G were to be planar, it would have 11 regions.

(b) G cannot be planar because it violates Euler's formula, which states that for any planar graph with V vertices, E edges, and R regions, the equation V - E + R = 2 holds. In this case, with 6 vertices and 14 edges, the resulting value of R does not match the expected value, indicating that G is non-planar.

(a) To determine the number of regions in a planar graph with V vertices and E edges, we can use Euler's formula: V - E + R = 2. Given that the graph G has 6 vertices and 14 edges, we can solve for R by substituting these values into the formula: 6 - 14 + R = 2. Solving this equation, we find R = 11. Therefore, if G were to be planar, it would have 11 regions.

(b) To prove that G cannot be planar, we can again apply Euler's formula. If G were planar, it would satisfy V - E + R = 2. Substituting the known values of V = 6 and E = 14, we have 6 - 14 + R = 2. Solving for R, we find R = 10. However, we determined in part (a) that if G were planar, it would have 11 regions. Since the obtained value of R does not match the expected value, G cannot be planar. Thus, the given graph violates Euler's formula, providing evidence for its non-planarity.

learn more about Euler's formula here:

https://brainly.com/question/12274716

#SPJ11

The approximate value of f(1) using Euler's method with two steps of equal size is 6.636. The range of f for t > 0 is 0 < f(t) < 6.

a. The limiting factor in this logistic differential equation is the carrying capacity, which is 6 in this case. As y approaches 6, the growth rate of y slows down, until it eventually levels off at the carrying capacity.

b. To use Euler's method, we first need to calculate the slope of the solution at t=0. Using the given differential equation, we can find that the slope at t=0 is y(0)/8(6-y(0)) = 8/8(6-8) = -1/6.

Using Euler's method with two steps of equal size, we can approximate f(1) as follows:

f(0.5) = f(0) + (1/2)dy/dx|t=0

= 8 - (1/2)(1/6)*8

= 7.333...

f(1) = f(0.5) + (1/2)dy/dx|t=0.5

= 7.333... - (1/2)(7.333.../8)*(6-7.333...)

= 6.636...

Therefore, the approximate value of f(1) using Euler's method with two steps of equal size is 6.636.

c. The range of f for t > 0 is 0 < f(t) < 6, since the carrying capacity of the logistic equation is 6. As t approaches infinity, f(t) will approach 6, but never exceed it. Additionally, f(t) will never be negative, since it represents a population size. Therefore, the range of f for t > 0 is 0 < f(t) < 6.

Learn more about Euler's method here

https://brainly.com/question/21245378

#SPJ11

The angle bac is measured in 44 degrees.

An angle is a geometric figure formed by two rays with a common endpoint, called the vertex of the angle. The rays are also known as the sides or legs of the angle. Angles are typically measured in degrees, with a full circle measuring 360 degrees.

We have:  \(sin^{-1\)(\(\frac{3.1}{4.5}\)). We must determine the angle of BAC's measurement.

To figure out the estimation of the point BAC, we utilize the worth of transgression converse capability from the wrongdoing reverse table.

Angle BAC=x

\(sin^{-1\) (\(\frac{3.1}{4.5}\)) = x

sin x = (\(\frac{3.1}{4.5}\))

sin x= 0.688

x=  \(sin^{-1\) (0.688)

Substituting \(sin^{-1\) (0.688) =43.5

x=43.5°

x ≈ 44°

Consequently, the angle BAC measurement is 44°.

Learn more about angles

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

What is the measure of angle bac? round to the nearest whole degree.

The study would use a simple random sampling because it would be easy to randomly select. The study would use cluster sampling because the of fall into naturally occurring subgroups. The study would use stratified sampling because it would be important to have members from each segment of the population.

The study is a sample survey, because the population is for it to be practical to record all of the responses.

a. The study would use a simple random sampling because it would be easy to randomly select members of the population. Simple random sampling is a type of probability sampling that is used when the population is homogenous and every member has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

b. The study would use cluster sampling because the members of the population fall into naturally occurring subgroups. Cluster sampling is a type of probability sampling that is used when the population is heterogeneous and can be divided into naturally occurring subgroups.

c. The study would use stratified sampling because it would be important to have members from each segment of the population. Stratified sampling is a type of probability sampling that is used when the population is heterogeneous and can be divided into segments or strata based on certain characteristics.

d. The study is a sample survey, because the population is too large for it to be practical to record all of the responses. Sample survey is a type of survey that collects data from a sample of the population, rather than the entire population. This is often done when the population is too large or when it is not practical to survey the entire population.

To know more about  sampling refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30759604

#SPJ11

Answer N=10

Hope this helps

Answer:

9.5

Step-by-step explanation:

13-x-x=-6

13+6=2x

19=2x

9.5=x

Answer:9

Step-by-step explanation:

13 - 9 - 9

Answer:

X = 1

Y = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

Your welcome random person

Answer:

Since 1 milligram is \(\frac{1}{10^{6} }\) or \(10^{-6}\) kilogram we can then use ratio to solve.

Step-by-step explanation:

#1)

1  :  \(10^{-6}\)

x :  1.989*10^27

Cross multiply to get:

\(10^{-6}\)x = 1.989*10^27

Divide both sides by \(10^{-6}\) to get:

x = \(\frac{ 1.989*10^{27}}{10^{-6}}\) which is going to give you  1.989*10^33

Therefore 1.989*10^27 kilograms = 1.989*10^33 milligrams

#2) we can use the same procedure as (#1)

                 1  :  \(10^{-6}\)

1.989*10^33 : x

Cross multiply to get:

1.989*10^27 = x

Therefore 1.989*10^27 milligrams = 1.989*10^33 kilograms

Note: I'm not really sure if this is what you wanted, but hope I was able to help.

Answer:2024

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

any of the factors of a product considered in relation to a specific factor especially : a constant factor of a term as distinguished from a variable. 2a : a number that serves as a measure of some property or characteristic (as of a substance, device, or process) coefficient of expansion of a metal. b : measure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

in math it is this:

a numerical or constant quantity placed before and multiplying the variable in an algebraic expression (e.g. 4 in 4xy).

in physics it is this:

a multiplier or factor that measures some property

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 50

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\log _{10}\left(x\right)=\log _{10}\left(2x^2\right)-2\)

\(\log _{10}\left(x\right)=\log _{10}\left(2x^2\right)-\log _{10}\left(100\right)\)

\(\log _{10}\left(x\right)=\log _{10}\left(\frac{2x^2}{100} \right)\)

\(x = \frac{2x^2}{100}\)

\(100x=2x^2\)

\(x^2 = 50x\)

\(x = 50\)

Answer:

0.318

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.31818181818182 as a decimal

0.318 rounded to the nearest thousandth

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3x + 6y = 108

Step-by-step explanation:

If I am incorrect in my reasoning, please let me know so that I can plan better for my future answers. Have an amazing day.

The equivalent expression of 5\(x^{3/2}\) is  5√(x³). The correct option is last one.

Expressions that are equivalent to the same thing, even when they have distinct appearances. When we enter the same value(s) for the variable, two algebraic expressions that are equivalent have the same value (s).

Given:

An expression,

5\(x^{3/2}\)

To find the equivalent expression:

We have to simplify the expression,

5\(x^{3.1/2}\)

= 5(x³)\(){1/2}\)

= 5√(x³)

The above expression is an equivalent expression.

Therefore, 5√(x³) is an equivalent expression.

To learn more about the equivalent expression;

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ1

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Imagine you have b = 2.

Plug 2 into the equation 2b + b = 3b

You get: 2(2) + 2 = 3(2)

Which solves to be 6 = 6

As long as the variable is the same, in this case b, and they are to the same power, in this case ^1, you can combine them.

Answer:

The answer is No they are not equvalient expression

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark as brailist

\(\text {Hello! Let's Solve this Problem!}\)

\(\text {The Formula to Solving this is to Multiply the value by 10.}\)

\(\text {Note: 1cm = 10mm}\)

\(\text {\underline {Multiply}}\)

\(\text {160*10=}\)

\(\text {Your Answer Would Be:}\)

\(\huge\boxed {1600mm}}\)

\(\text {Best of Luck!}\)

Solution:

We know that:

Let's multiply both sides by 160 to determine how much millimeters is 160 centimeters.

Multiplying both sides by 160:

Simplifying both sides:

Thus, 160 centimeters is 1600 millimeters.

Answer:

20 kph

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1:

10 : 30         Ratio

Step 2:

60 mins in hour        

Step 3:

10 : 30 = x : 60        Equation

Step 4:

30x = 600       Multiply

Step 5:

x = 600 ÷ 30         Divide

Answer:

x = 20

Hope This Helps :)

Answer:

42

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter is \(2l+2w\)

Answer: 42

Hope this helped! Please mark brainliest :)

To consider whether this statement is true or not

   ⇒ must determine the number of milliliters in a liter

        ⇒ 1 Liter = 1000 milliliter

To compare both containers, lets set both containers in terms of milliliters

By looking at the data

  ⇒ the 3000-milliliter container holds more than the2-liter container

Thus, the statement: A 2-liter container holds more than a 3,000-milliliter container

  ⇒ False

Answer: False

Hope that helps!

Answer:

False because 2 liters = 2,000 milliliters. Therefore that is not possible.