Identify the figure of speech: "He worked in a steaming pit of hell."

Answer:

answer is the stage directions describe how characters react to helen

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

ikrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Explanation:

ikr

For an app (computer-based or software application) to be considered the best app ever is a matter of judgment.

The best app serves the end-users requirements excellently.  It helps end-users to undertake self-directed processes because of their easy application and user-friendliness.

For example, some software end-users have considered that the Mobile IKR (home wiring installation) is the best app because it simplifies home wiring installation using a barcode scanner.

Thus, the best app ever remains a matter of judgment as it cannot be universally proven.

Learn more about the software applications at https://brainly.com/question/1538272

The sentence that corrects the pronoun with an unclear antecedent is "When garden tomatoes have aphid infestations, mildew, and fungal infections, it is important to treat them first before moving on to the other problems."

Explanation: An antecedent is a word, phrase, or clause that a pronoun refers to or replaces. An unclear antecedent is a term that a pronoun cannot unequivocally specify. In addition, an unclear antecedent occurs when a pronoun is used to refer to a noun, but the noun is unclear, vague, or ambiguous in the sentence. This causes the reader or listener to be unsure of who or what the pronoun is referring to. In this case, the pronoun "it" has an unclear antecedent in the sentence "When garden tomatoes have aphid infestations, mildew, and fungal infections, it is important to treat it first before moving on to the other problems." Here, we are not sure if the pronoun is referring to aphid infestations, mildew, fungal infections, or garden tomatoes.

Instead, the corrected sentence, "When garden tomatoes have aphid infestations, mildew, and fungal infections, it is important to treat them first before moving on to the other problems," properly replaces "it" with the appropriate plural noun "them" that is consistent with "aphid infestations, mildew, and fungal infections".

To know more about sentence visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/23384827

#SPJ11

Answer:

Katniss Everdeen

Explanation:

Katniss Everdeen and peta melark are the 2 tributes for district 12 and Katniss takes the spot of primrose her 12 year old sister.

Answer:

The author was worried he/she might not enjoy camp.

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. If he were alive today, he would probably revise his theory of inartistic proofs to account for changes in society and technology.

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs are the means of persuasion which are not developed by the speaker, they include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. Each of these proofs has the ability to change the minds of an audience, even though they are not created by the speaker. However, if Aristotle were alive today, he may have revised these proofs to account for modern technology and changes in society. Here are some possible changes to Aristotle's inartistic proofs.

1. Laws: Aristotle's definition of laws would probably still hold up today. However, in modern society, there are more laws than ever before. Additionally, laws are now easier to access than they were in Aristotle's time, thanks to the internet. This may change the way people view the legitimacy of laws, since they are more visible than they were in the past.

2. Witnesses: Witnesses are still a powerful tool for persuasion. However, social media has changed the way we view witnesses. Today, there are more opportunities for people to share their stories, and more ways for others to verify them. This means that a witness's testimony may carry more weight than it did in Aristotle's time.

3. Contracts: Contracts are still important in modern society, but they are no longer the only way to establish agreements. For example, digital signatures and online agreements are now widely accepted. This means that contracts are less tangible than they used to be, which may change the way we view their authority.

4. Oaths: Oaths are still important in many contexts, but they are less commonly used than they were in the past. Today, people may be more likely to rely on other forms of proof, such as witnesses or contracts. However, oaths still hold a certain amount of authority, especially in legal contexts.

5. Torture: Torture is no longer an acceptable means of persuasion in modern society. If Aristotle were alive today, he would likely recognize this and revise his theory of inartistic proofs to exclude torture.

For more such questions on Aristotle, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24994054

#SPJ8

Answer:

sorry i don't know i know but yes i think you did well i don't know because i'm in 3rd grade❤️

Answer:

yes, you did it correctly

Answer:King names so many mountain ranges because in Paragraph 22, he says “'from every mountainside, let freedom ring! '” He is listing examples of the mountain ranges in the United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Day I Got into Trouble

It was a bright and sunny day, one that seemed to promise endless possibilities. Little did I know that it would turn out to be a day filled with unexpected challenges and the consequences of my actions. Looking back, I can't help but reflect on the valuable lessons I learned from that particular day.

It all started innocently enough. I was hanging out with my friends, feeling carefree and invincible, as teenagers often do. We decided to venture into a forbidden territory—an abandoned building that was rumored to be haunted. Ignoring the warnings, we entered the dilapidated structure, fueled by a mix of curiosity and thrill-seeking.

As we explored the eerie halls, a sense of excitement washed over us. It felt like we were protagonists in an adventure story, oblivious to the dangers that lurked within those decaying walls. In our recklessness, we failed to consider the potential consequences of our actions.

That's when trouble struck. In our exuberance, we accidentally knocked over an old lamp, causing a spark that ignited a small fire. Panic seized our hearts as the flames rapidly spread, engulfing the room. Fear and guilt washed over me, realizing the magnitude of what we had done. We immediately scrambled to find a way to extinguish the fire, but our efforts were in vain. The blaze grew more intense, and smoke filled the air, making it difficult to breathe.

Realizing that our safety was at risk, we made the decision to abandon the building and seek help. We called the fire department, confessing to our foolish actions and pleading for assistance. As we waited for the firefighters to arrive, a wave of remorse washed over me. I couldn't help but think about the potential harm we had caused to ourselves and others.

When the fire department finally arrived, they swiftly brought the fire under control. The relief on their faces was evident, but so was their disappointment. They reprimanded us for our reckless behavior, reminding us of the potential consequences and the importance of making responsible choices. The gravity of our actions hit me like a ton of bricks, and I vowed to learn from this experience.

The aftermath of that day was far from pleasant. We faced legal consequences for trespassing and property damage. Moreover, I had to confront my own guilt and remorse for my part in the incident. It was a humbling experience that taught me the importance of accountability and the potential ramifications of thoughtless actions.

In retrospect, that day serves as a poignant reminder of the power of choices. I learned that every decision, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant, carries consequences. It taught me the value of responsible decision-making, respect for rules, and the importance of considering the potential impact of my actions on myself and others.

Getting into trouble that day was a pivotal moment in my life. It forced me to confront my own recklessness and provided me with an invaluable lesson in responsibility. I am grateful for the experience, as it shaped my character and transformed me into a more conscientious individual. From that day forward, I have strived to make better choices, always considering the potential consequences of my actions before plunging headlong into the unknown.

At the beginning of the tragedy of Macbeth, act iii, Banquo says that he thinks that Macbeth is Duncan's murderer.

Banquo suspects Macbeth but remembers the witches' predictions that his own children will be kings, and gets reassured. He tells the Macbeths that he intends to go riding with Fleance. The Macbeths convince Banquo to return later that evening to their new palace for a feast.

Macbeth comes to the realization that the Witches' prophecy about Banquo's children being kings, poses a threat to his own position. He could not take the thought of Banquo's descendants taking his position. Macbeth summons two hired murderers and counter-checks with them their earlier arrangements for the killing of Banquo.

To read more about Macbeth visit:

brainly.com/question/26089908

#SPJ4

I showed her the house quickly.

I hope this helps

God bless

In the first column of the Unit V Assignment Template, you will need to identify the fallacy present in each of the four instances. Some examples of common fallacies include ad hominem attacks, false cause and effect, and slippery slope arguments.

In the second column, you will need to identify the conclusion of the fallacious argument. This refers to the statement or belief that the person is trying to prove or support through their flawed reasoning.

Finally, in the third column, you will need to identify the premises, or the reasons or evidence used to support the conclusion. These premises may or may not be valid, but it's important to identify them to understand the logic behind the fallacy.

Overall, the goal of this assignment is to help you understand the importance of identifying fallacies and analyzing arguments critically. By learning to spot flaws in reasoning, you can become a more effective and persuasive communicator, as well as a more informed consumer of information.

You can learn more about fallacy at: brainly.com/question/14669739

#SPJ11

When Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah landed in Karachi, He was known to have not show any  facial warmth in response to the shouts of joys of the people.

When Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah landed in Karachi, He was known to have not show any warmth in response to the shouts of joys.

He was said to have waved his hands to  be able to be part of the merriment and joys of the excited people but he was not seen to be  in high spirits.

It was said that  he was sad from his heart of heart on that grand occasion given to him.  

Learn more about happiness from

https://brainly.com/question/7292814

#SPJ1

Answer:

I will tell you a best positive effect, People are staying in their homes and spending time with their family. The world which was spending many millions for cleanliness of the country or city, is now crystal clean. Like the River Ganges in India, Switzerland is the cleanest country because of thick forest, clean water and its pollution free.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

better health

more active

mentally healthy/ fresh

better sleep in lockdown

people caught up with some incomplete work

Answer:

Underneath

Explanation:

Preposition is a word (or several of them) that usually comes before a noun or a pronoun, its role is to show us the connection between a noun/pronoun and other parts of a sentence. In the given example, preposition "underneath" in the adverbial phrase "underneath the mattress" helps us to define a place of an object (secret envelope).

Legends, fairy tales, myths and other stories are considered to be narratives. A narrative is a report expressed through written or spoken words. It is a story of related events arranged in a logical sequence and may be fiction or non-fiction.

Narratives can also come in the form of a movie, still or moving images, role plays or drama.

What is a myth?

These are traditional stories that are usually full of histories, events and mostly about the supernatural. Myth, a symbolic story that typically has an undetermined origin and is at least partially traditional, allegedly relating true occurrences, and is particularly connected to religious belief.For instance, a creation myth is a narrative that describes how the world came to be. You may have studied myths about gods and goddesses who fight and trick one another from ancient Greece or Rome.

Learn more about myth to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/18487597

#SPJ4

Here are some of the similarities between primary and secondary sources: They are both sources of information. They are both generally written by experts who know what they're talking about.

Most research uses both primary and secondary sources. They complement each other to help you build a convincing argument. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but secondary sources show how your work relates to existing research.

Primary sources can be described as those sources that are closest to the origin of the information. They contain raw information and thus, must be interpreted by researchers.

To know more about primary visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29771183

#SPJ1

Answer:

the answer is The delegate would order supplies for people such as carpenters. Then, they would distribute the necessities evenly throughout the city. This caused two men to do something incredible. Stephen Girard and Peter Helm were going to "personally manage Bush Hill."

Explanation:

NOT SURE IF THIS IS CORRECT BUT HOPE I HELPED

Danforth is said to be alarmed at the news because it suggests that the girls may be telling the truth about their accusations of witchcraft.

Danforth is a character in the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller. He is the Deputy Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and is the presiding judge in the Salem witch trials.

This would mean that the court has been wrong in its judgement and that the accused are innocent. Danforth is also concerned that if the girls are telling the truth, then the court's authority and reputation will be damaged. He is also worried that the court's decision could be overturned and that the accused could be released.

To know more about Danforth

https://brainly.com/question/13076096

#SPJ4

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer: A double-Barreled question!!

Explanation:

The organizational pattern that structures the main points according to explanations for accepting a thesis as desirable or true is called the "Problem-Solution" pattern.

In this pattern, the speech is structured in a way that highlights a problem or issue and then presents a thesis statement as the solution or desired outcome. The main points of the speech are organized to provide explanations, evidence, and arguments that support the thesis statement.

Here's an example of how the main points can be structured using the Problem-Solution pattern:

I. Introduction

- Attention-grabbing opening

- Background information on the problem

II. Problem

- Explanation of the problem

- Discussion of the consequences or implications of the problem

III. Thesis Statement

- Clear statement of the desired outcome or solution

IV. Main Point 1: Explanation of the Desirability

- Explanation of why the thesis statement is desirable or beneficial

- Supporting evidence and examples

V. Main Point 2: Explanation of the Truth

- Explanation of why the thesis statement is true or valid

- Supporting evidence and examples

VI. Main Point 3: Counterarguments and Rebuttals

- Addressing potential counterarguments and providing rebuttals

- Refuting opposing viewpoints and strengthening the thesis statement

VII. Conclusion

- Restatement of the thesis statement and its desirability or truth

- Recap of main points

- Call to action or final thoughts

By structuring the speech in this way, the speaker can effectively present explanations and arguments that support the acceptance of the thesis statement as desirable or true.

Answer:

habers do nut get my wy

Explanation:

>;C

The essay "What Money Can't Buy" by Michael J. Sandel presents a compelling thesis that, despite access to a variety of life experiences, money cannot be used to buy morality, meaning, or purpose.

According to Sandel, some of life's most significant aspects cannot be quantified, and an obsession with buying and selling might eventually harm society's social cohesion and moral standards.

He argues that immaterial values like love, loyalty, and friendship are priceless and cannot be purchased with money. This argument emphasizes the value of appreciating and giving priority to the intangible aspects of life while acknowledging the function that money plays in enabling access to a certain level of living.

To learn more about Michael J. Sandel link is here

brainly.com/question/32272158

#SPJ4

Answer:

A collective noun

Explanation:

The objection of "playing god" often arises in discussions related to medical and technological that involve significant control or manipulation over nature or human life.  

 Natural law ethics, rooted in the belief that there are objective moral principles derived from nature, holds that certain actions are inherently wrong because they violate the natural order or interfere with the role of a divine being. The objection suggests that humans should not overstep their bounds and assume the role of a higher power or tamper with matters that are considered sacred or beyond human control.

learn more about "playing god" here :

https://brainly.com/question/28912625

#SPJ11

The moral approach that the "playing god" objection is based upon is **natural law ethics**.

Natural law ethics is a moral theory that holds that there are objective moral laws that are inherent in nature and can be discovered by reason. These moral laws are said to be God-given, and therefore, humans should not violate them. The "playing god" objection argues that certain actions, such as genetic engineering or cloning, are violations of natural law and therefore wrong.Option A: Utilitarianism is a moral theory that judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its consequences. Utilitarians believe that the right action is the one that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The "playing god" objection is not based on utilitarianism because it does not consider the consequences of an action.Option B: Kant's categorical imperative is a moral principle that states that we should only act in ways that we could will to be universal laws. Kant believed that there are certain moral laws that are absolute and cannot be violated. The "playing god" objection is not based on Kant's categorical imperative because it does not consider whether an action is universally applicable.

Learn more about objection here:

https://brainly.com/question/12569661

#SPJ11

Pain, particularly while bearing weight on the affected foot. When you touch the ankle, you will feel tenderness. Swelling. Bruising.

An ankle sprain in a football player is often caused by a tackle, although additional reasons include running, jumping, or falling. To avoid recurring ankle sprains and long-term pain, such as arthritis, it is critical to get treatment and rehabilitation for a damaged ankle.

The typical healing period for high ankle sprains is reported to be between 15 and 46 days, which is much longer than the recovery time for common lateral ankle sprains, which is 6.5 days on average.

Learn more about to football

https://brainly.com/question/22468787

#SPJ4

The sentence that de-emphasizes the nonessential sentence information is this:

b) Professor Jenkins, who recently returned from a sabbatical leave, finally published his novel.

The sentence that correctly de-emphasizes the sentence information is the one where the extra piece of information was not highlighted. The brackets were used to enclose the non-essential information so that the reader will grab the extra idea about Professor Jenkins.

In the first sentence, the non-essential information was also made to stand out. This is a common practice in writing. It is only the first information that does not have the extra information correctly differentiated.

Learn more about sentence information here:

https://brainly.com/question/21763887

#SPJ1