Answers
If an officer forcibly subdued a subject, it would be expected that the officer used appropriate force.
When law enforcement officers need to subdue a subject, they are expected to use force that is necessary and proportional to the situation. The level of force used should be based on the circumstances, the threat posed by the subject, and the officer's training and judgment.
Law enforcement agencies typically provide guidelines and training on the use of force, which emphasize the principles of proportionality, reasonableness, and minimizing harm. Officers are trained to employ a continuum of force, starting with verbal commands, moving to non-lethal force options such as pepper spray, batons, or Tasers, and, as a last resort, lethal force when there is an imminent threat to life.
Forcefully subduing a subject may involve physical techniques, such as restraining holds, handcuffing, or using necessary physical force to gain control and ensure the safety of both the officer and the subject. It is essential that officers apply force in a manner that is reasonable, justifiable, and consistent with their training and departmental policies.
Excessive or unnecessary use of force by law enforcement officers is a serious concern and can lead to allegations of misconduct, civil rights violations, and public outcry. Proper documentation and reporting of incidents involving the use of force are crucial for accountability and transparency.
It is important to note that the specific circumstances of each incident will determine what level and type of force are deemed appropriate. The use of force by law enforcement should always be subject to scrutiny, review, and, when necessary, legal investigations to ensure the protection of civil rights and the fair administration of justice.
Learn more about forcibly here
https://brainly.com/question/7588800
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Answers
The utilitarian approach to moral reasoning focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being by considering the costs and benefits of actions. It weighs the consequences of actions and aims to achieve the greatest net benefit for the greatest number of people.
In business ethics, while the utilitarian approach can be applied, it is not always the most common approach. This is because it may require weighing the costs and benefits of actions in a way that can be challenging or subjective, especially when considering factors such as individual rights, justice, and other moral values.
Other approaches, such as deontological ethics or virtue ethics, may also be employed in business ethics depending on the specific circumstances and values involved.
The international association for identification concluded that the minimum number of friction ridge characteristics which must be present in two impressions in order to establish positive identification is.
Answers
There is no minimum number of friction ridge characteristics that must be present in two impressions in order to establish definite identification, according to the International Association for Identification.
The largest forensic association in the world is the International Association for Identification. In October 1915, it was first established as the "International Association for Criminal Identification." It has developed over the years into an educational and certification organization with more than 6,000 members worldwide.The International Association for Identification aspires to be the leading organization for professionals involved in forensic investigation, physical evidence analysis, and identification. It has six aims to complete this mission.Thus the answer is zero.
Refer here to learn more about International Association for Identification: https://brainly.com/question/24183339
#SPJ4
Label these examples as either instances of representative or direct democracy
Answers
The given examples can be labelled as direct or representative government as given below-
Direct democracy:
A state constitution is amended following a referendum.
California's citizens vote to recall their Governor.
Representative democracy:
Congress votes to impeach an unpopular candidate.
A major bill that many legislators campaigned on passes Congress.
A major bill supported by the majority of citizens passes a state legislature.
Democracy is a form of government where the authority lies on some people but the important and unique part of it is that the government is established "of the people, for the people, and by the people."
A direct democracy is where the people are directly involved in the affairs of the government. In this type of government, any decision needed is voted on by the people, with no need for representation. Example of direct democracy is Switzerland. In this regard, the amendment of a state's constitution following a referendum and the voting to recall their Governor is an example of direct democracy. On the other hand, representative democracy is where the people elect or chose leaders to represent them and their interests. Most of the current democracies today are representative democracies, like India and the United States. The first, second, and third examples are representative forms of democracy.A democracy is a government where power rests on the public instead of a single ruler. There are different types of democracies, but all revolve around the general importance of the public.
Learn more about direct and representative democracy here:
brainly.com/question/14649838
state a proposition of policy and demonstrate
Answers
A Proposition of Policy Speech makes a persuasive argument about a course of action regarding a controversial topic of social or public concern.
While the proposition is based on some value premise, the focus of the discussion is not necessarily on this underlying premise, but more on the desirability and ability to act.
What is a policy?Policies are a set of general guidelines. They outline your organization's plan for tackling certain issues. The purpose of policies is to communicate an organization’s values, philosophy, and culture.
The term may apply to government, public sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals, Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law.
Learn more about Policies here,
https://brainly.com/question/3521988
#SPJ1
The purpose of scanning the crime scene by the C.S.I. after it has
been secured is not to...
Determine what personal protective equipment should be used
Determine what level of investigation should be conducted
Prepare preliminary documentation such as notes rough sketches or
photographs
Locate and apprehend the suspect
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
To must walk thoroughly through the scene to get an idea of how the crime was committed, and if there is any entry/exit wounds on people or objects. The purpose of the walk through is to determine what needs to be more closely examined and what evidence may be present
What are the elements of voluntary manslaughter?
Answers
It is the responsibility of the legislative branch to
O carry out the laws.
O enforce the laws.
O create the laws.
O interpret the laws.
Answers
Answer:
The responsibility of the legislative branch is to
create the laws.
Write a two- to three-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast the structure and function of the national government with the structure and function of New Hampshire's/States government. Use what you’ve learned about the national government and do research to find out more about your state government. Include the following in your essay:
The structure of national and state government
The functions of national and state government
The distribution of power between national and state government, including the purpose of Article IV, Section 4 of the US Constitution
Current state leaders and the roles and functions they perform within state government
Answers
National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution defined by the U.S. Constitution.
The Essay
The national government and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.
New Hampshire's current state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.
Learn more about structure of government at:
https://brainly.com/question/22236084
#SPJ1
Which is not true of STRs?
a. STRs are found in all parts of DNA.
b.STRs are often about 2-5 base pairs long.
c. DNA contains hundreds of STRs.
d.CODIS uses STRs.
Answers
For what is the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 noted?
a. The shift from cost containment to improvement of quality as the principal theme in federal health policy
b. The shift from cost containment to improvement of access as the principal theme in federal health policy
c. The shift from improvement of access to cost containment as the principal theme in federal health policy
d. The shift from improvement of quality to cost containment as the principal theme in federal health policy
Answers
The National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 is noted for its focus on the improvement of access to healthcare services as the principal theme in federal health policy.
The act aimed to develop and implement a national health planning process, establish a system of regional health planning organizations, and provide federal funds to support state and local health planning efforts. It sought to ensure that health resources were distributed equitably and efficiently, particularly to underserved and disadvantaged communities.
Through this act, the federal government played a greater role in regulating and coordinating healthcare services, with an emphasis on increasing access for all Americans. This marked a shift from previous policies that focused primarily on cost containment and improving quality of care.
The National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 also created the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which has since played a significant role in improving access to healthcare services for vulnerable populations through programs like the National Health Service Corps and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program. Overall, the act has had a lasting impact on healthcare policy and practice in the United States.
Learn more about federal health policy here
https://brainly.com/question/28030345
#SPJ11
It is true or false that in the American legal system, case law results every time any court decides a case.
Answers
the answer is true explanation my uncle's an attorney
Is there any restriction that applies to computer games advocating the doing of a terrorist act in Australia? 1. Australian law protects such cases as a form of freedom of speech/expression. 2. Such games may not be sold publicly but distribution for private use is allowed. 3. Such games may not be sold or provided online. 4. Such games may not be screened. 5. Options 2 and 4 above 6. Options 3 and 4 above 7. Options 1 and 2 above 8. None of the above
Answers
Computer games that encourage carrying out terrorist acts are subject to a ban on public sale in Australia, however private usage of such games is permitted. Describe terrorism. A crime or an action that intentionally spreads fear, usually by violence against people or property, is referred to as terrorism. Terrorist acts are carried out to advance a specific political philosophy or cause. Terrorists include anyone or any group of people who carry out terrorist acts. Australian legislation on terrorism-promoting video games. Australian law prohibits the sale of video games that encourage the commission of terrorist acts. On the other hand, private use distribution is allowed. However, such games may not be sold or provided online, nor may they be screened.
Therefore, Option (2) and (4) above is the correct answer. Option (1) is incorrect since Australian law does not protect computer games that advocate terrorism as a form of freedom of speech/expression. In Australia, advocating a terrorist act is a crime. As a result, computer games that promote terrorism are not regarded as protected speech or expression. Option (3) is also incorrect since Australian law does not allow for the online sale or provision of computer games that advocate for the commission of a terrorist act.
Know about the rights enjoyed by Australian citizens:
https://brainly.com/question/14184036
#SPJ11
legal rule can be enforced directly by private individuals. true or false with justification?
Answers
The answer is false. The Supreme Court of India has the authority has legal to issue writs private of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution.
In order to protect the "Rule of law," the Supreme Court is also granted the authority of judicial review. The laws must be the supreme law of the land, private publicly publicised, equally enforced, and decided by an independent judiciary, for example, which is a procedural aspect of the rule of legal law. The rule of law, according to the United Nations (UN) system, is a principle of government that holds everyone, including the State itself.
To learn more about legal, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ1
In summary, how does lobbying work? (This should be a long answer.)
Answers
Answer:
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.
Explanation:
11. Write a short story of a fictitious crime and describe how soil evidence
helped link a suspect to the crime scene or victim.
12. Describe physical characteristics of soil that could heln distinguish
Answers
Answer:
Here is the short story:
The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.
Explanation:
The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off. The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.
In many early medical murder cases like that of Howard Shipman, which of the following was the primary motivation?
O a. Attention
O b. Money
Oc Control
O d. Power
Answers
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answers
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not
what is offer and then how can give example for the offer
Answers
Answer:
Offer promise to do or refrain from doing something in exchange for something else. An offer must be stated and delivered in a way that would lead a reasonable person to expect a binding contract to arise from its acceptance. business law.
I can give you a good offer for this phone
Answer:
an act of putting something forth for consideration
George is a local drug dealer who has a professionally trained pit bull that has been taught to respond to George’s second language, which is German. During a traffic stop, the law enforcement officer discovers the drugs in the trunk of George’s vehicle, subsequent to George’s verbal consent to search the vehicle. Upon discovery of the drugs, George commands his pit bull in German to attack the law enforcement officer. George may be charged with assault and battery by means of a____________________. 1. What kind of crime can George be charged with?
2. Can the pit bull dog be considered a dangerous weapon and why?
Answers
It is possible to charge George with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, in this case, his pit bull dog, which he ordered to attack the law enforcement official.
Due to its training to obey George's German directions and its usage in an attack on the officer, the pit bull dog can be regarded as a potentially lethal weapon.
Penalties for using a dangerous weapon instead of an ordinary weapon or none at all can be more severe. George might face more severe accusations and punishments as a result of using his pit bull dog to assault the law enforcement official.
As a result, the significance of the crime can George be charged are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on weapon, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4487435
#SPJ1
Summarize 1-3 Articles of the U.S. Constitution
Answers
Answer:
Article I of the U.S. Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate. It also outlines the powers of Congress such as the ability to raise taxes and regulate interstate commerce.
Article II lays out the executive branch, the President, and their powers such as the ability to make treaties and conduct foreign policy.
Article III establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. It also outlines the jurisdiction of the court system and the limits of the judicial powers.
Explanation:
What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?
Answers
Answer:
The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.
Hope I helped
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
In recent years, local government entities have filed lawsuits against oil companies to hold them responsible for the public costs of climate change under the theory of public nuisance. Marin and San Mateo Counties brought a case in 2017. These cases are still pending in the courts today.
What is your opinion regarding using the courts and the legal claim of public nuisance to hold oil companies responsible for public costs of climate change?
Answers
Answer:
jsnndnejz
I need points so don't listen to me
the department of justice filed a lawsuit against microsoft claiming it was engaging in unfair practices by ____________.
Answers
The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Microsoft in 1998, claiming it was engaging in unfair practices by using its monopoly power in the PC operating systems market to maintain its dominance and eliminate competition, specifically Netscape Communications Corporation.
Microsoft was bundling its web browser, Internet Explorer, with its Windows operating system, making it the default browser for most users and hindering competition from Netscape Navigator, which was still the dominant browser at the time.The lawsuit argued that Microsoft's practices harmed competition and innovation, and that it was violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Department of Justice sought to break up the company into smaller pieces, but a settlement was eventually reached in which Microsoft agreed to stop bundling Internet Explorer with Windows and to allow other companies to design software that could be integrated with the operating system.
The lawsuit and its settlement had a significant impact on the technology industry and set a precedent for antitrust enforcement in the United States.
To know more about Monopoly power visit-
brainly.com/question/29870936
#SPJ11
Jurisdiction refers to witch of the following
Answers
Answer:
in Parliament refers to justice
Explanation:
Mark brainliest
This case made the 2nd Amendment's right to bear arms applicable to the States,as a fundamental right.
Answers
The answer is District of Columbia v. Heller
the part of the us government that interprets laws is the executive branch. vice president. senate. judicial branch.
true or false
Answers
The correct statement is that the part of the US government that interprets laws is the Judicial Branch, specifically the Supreme Court and lower federal courts. The statement "the part of the US government that interprets laws is the executive branch, vice president, senate, judicial branch" is false.
The Judicial branch is defined as the body of government responsible for interpreting laws and applying them to real-life situations in order to resolve disputes. The judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws. The judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, is part of the judicial branch.
To learn more about "Judicial Branch" visit: https://brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ11
you should hve your battery and charging system check?
Answers
Directions: Read about Affirmative Defenses and the scenario below then answer the
following questions.
Dr. Gandhi is employed at Seward Hospital, where he is in charge of the Staff
Committee Fund and writes checks on the hospital account for items related to the
administration of the Hospital. Dr. Gandhi is also the head of a group of people who are
purchasing property and building a rehabilitation center on it. Dr. Gandhi also writes
checks for this association. One day, while writing checks for Seward Hospital, Dr.
Gandhi wrote a check for his association using a hospital check. This was discovered
by hospital staff and it was reported to the authorities. It is alleged that he deposited the
Hospital money into his account and he is charged with embezzlement of over 100,000
dollars. Dr. Gandhi has at least 2 million dollars in his personal account.Dr. Gandhi has
hired an attorney. What is his best defense? Explain
Answers
Dr. Gandhi's best defense is the defense of mistake. He can argue that he did not intend to embezzle the money, but made a mistake in using the hospital check for his association.
What is the Defense of Mistake?The defense of mistake is a legal defense that can be used in criminal cases where the defendant argues that they did not intend to commit the crime they are being accused of. This defense asserts that the defendant acted under a genuine belief that their actions were lawful, and therefore did not have the criminal intent necessary for a conviction.
This defense can be used in a variety of circumstances, such as when a person makes an error in judgment or misinterprets the law. For example, if a person accidentally writes a check from a company account instead of their personal account, they might be able to use the defense of mistake. The success of this defense will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the strength of the evidence presented.
Learn more about defense of mistake here: https://brainly.com/question/28172750
#SPJ1
additional demand for agricultural products leads to complex and unintended consequences. the government will often –
Answers
The government will often implement policies or regulations to address these unintended consequences and mitigate their effects on the environment, economy, and society.
This can include promoting sustainable agricultural practices, investing in research and development of new technologies, and supporting programs that encourage conservation and biodiversity. It is important to carefully consider the long-term impacts of increased demand for agricultural products and work towards finding solutions that balance economic growth with environmental sustainability. The additional demand for agricultural products can lead to complex and unintended consequences. In response, the government will often implement policies and regulations to manage these effects, promote sustainable agriculture, and ensure food security.
learn more about implement
https://brainly.com/question/23969399
#SPJ11