If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600​

Answer:  very expensive store

Explanation:

The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.

In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.

Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181

#SPJ1

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

The purpose of this guidance is to answer questions that school officials may have concerning

the disclosure of personally identifiable information from students’ education records to outside

entities when addressing an H1N1 flu outbreak. H1N1 has the potential to pose a serious risk to

students, staff, and families throughout the 2009-2010 school year. Schools should work in

collaboration with their State and local public health departments to address questions about

sharing information between the school and these entities. Understanding how, what, and when

information can be shared is a critical part of preparedness.

To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

To know more about Crime Prevention:

brainly.com/question/14495855

#SPJ1

Answer:  The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports

Explanation:  This answer has been confirmed correct.

Analyzing the logical coherence, clarity, and ethical implications of these examples would be crucial in determining the persuasive strength of Foot's challenge to Rachels's position.

To determine whether Foot persuasively employs the two rescue scenarios and two medical scenarios to challenge Rachels's thinking about the morality of "killing" versus "letting die," a detailed analysis of Foot's arguments and their effectiveness is required. However, without specific information about the arguments and examples provided by Philippa Foot, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of her persuasive techniques.

Philippa Foot was a prominent philosopher known for her work in ethics, including her critique of consequentialist moral theories. She contributed to the debate surrounding the moral distinction between "killing" and "letting die" in certain ethical scenarios.

Rachels, in his influential essay "Active and Passive Euthanasia," argued that there is no morally relevant difference between killing and letting die in certain circumstances. He used examples such as Smith letting his cousin drown to inherit his wealth and Jones actively killing his cousin to inherit the same wealth to challenge the conventional moral distinction between killing and letting die.

Foot, in her response to Rachels, might have presented rescue scenarios and medical scenarios to demonstrate the significance of the moral distinction between killing and letting die. These scenarios could potentially highlight the different moral considerations and consequences associated with each action.

Without specific information about the content and argumentation within Foot's scenarios, it is challenging to evaluate her persuasive effectiveness in challenging Rachels's thinking. However, it is worth noting that the distinction between "killing" and "letting die" has been extensively debated in ethical discourse, with various philosophers presenting different perspectives and examples to support their arguments.

To make a comprehensive assessment of Foot's arguments and their impact on challenging Rachels's thinking, it would be necessary to review the specific arguments and examples put forth by Foot in relation to the two rescue scenarios and two medical scenarios. Analyzing the logical coherence, clarity, and ethical implications of these examples would be crucial in determining the persuasive strength of Foot's challenge to Rachels's position.

Learn more about persuasive here

https://brainly.com/question/30157232

#SPJ11

Option a is Correct. The assertions regarding the corporate tax filing requirements for corporations with a calendar year end are untrue for tax years beginning after December 31, 2015. By the 15th day of the third month after the end of the tax year, corporations are required to submit their annual federal income tax returns.

It can be claimed that a dividend distribution to the extent of the corporation's profits and earnings is given precedence in terms of the tax treatment of a distribution from the corporation to its shareholders. The allocation of the tax liabilities that the buyer and seller are responsible for paying is shown by the tax incidence.

The funds that businesses and individuals provide to the government in order to fund national operations. Tax on corporate income Businesses pay them a portion of their earnings. Capital gains: Any earnings or gains realized by individuals or organizations through the sale of certain assets, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate, are subject to a capital gains tax. Property tax: A local government assesses a property tax, which the owner of the property is responsible for paying.

Learn more about tax visit: brainly.com/question/26316390

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

For tax years beginning after December 31, 2015, which of the following statements regarding corporate tax filing requirements is false for corporations with a calendar year end?

a. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year.

b. Calendar year corporations may request an automatic five-month extension of time to file their federal income tax returns.

c. An extension of the income tax filing deadline does not extend the payment deadline for any balance of tax due for the taxable year.

d. Corporations must file their annual federal income tax returns by 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year.

Answer:

B is actively engaged in the group.

To protect yourself from drivers without enough insurance, carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage and verify other driver's insurance.

To protect yourself from drivers who do not carry the legally required amount of insurance, there are several steps you can take:

1. Carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage: This kind of insurance will cover your costs in the event that you are engaged in a mishap with a not driver and have sufficient protection to cover the harm.

2. Verify the other driver's insurance: After an accident, it is essential to get the other driver's accident data and confirm that they have the legitimately required measure of insurance. You can do this by reaching their insurance agency or checking with your state's branch of engine vehicles.

3. Take legal action: In the event that you are engaged in an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver and your protection doesn't completely cover your costs, you might need to make a legitimate move against the driver to recuperate your misfortunes.

4. Drive defensively: While you have no control over the activities of different drivers, you can decrease your gamble of being engaged in a mishap by driving protectively, submitting to transit regulations, and avoiding different vehicles out and about.

By making these steps, you can shield yourself from drivers who don't convey the legitimately required measure of insurance and limit the monetary effect of an accident.

Learn more about underinsured motorist coverage:

https://brainly.com/question/29409435

#SPJ4

Option A is correct.  They are all recognized rights under the copyright law.

About Copyright Law

Original works of authorship are given monopoly protection under American copyright law. Copyright law grants writers a set of unique rights, including the ability to manufacture & sell copies of the works, to develop derivative works, as well as to perform or show their works publicly, all with the declared aim of promoting art and culture. These exclusive rights have a time restriction and often end 95 years following publication or 70 years just after author's passing. Works released in the US before January 1, 1927, are considered to be in the public domain. The Copyright Act of 1976, which is included in Title 17 of the US Code, was the last major revision to United States copyright law.

To know more about copyright law:

brainly.com/question/22089522

#SPJ4

Answer: B. The justices share their written opinions on the case.

Explanation:

When the time comes for the Justices to decide on the case, they will discuss it by stating their opinions on the case in descending order first from the Chief  Justice and then from the most senior Justice to the least.

They will then vote on the case and then the Chief Justice or the most senior Justice on the majority side of the case will assign a justice to write the opinion of the court. The dissenting side can also do the same.

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

There are mainly two categories of law which are the criminal law and the civil law.

Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery is both a violation of both criminal and civil law. Criminal law is a law that has to do with crimes while civil law is the law that has to do with private matters or dispute.

It is both a violation of both criminal and civil law because since Franklin intentionally killed two people, he can be charged with homicide in criminal court. Also, based on civil law, he can be sued for wrongful death.

A clear vision for the nation's future, the ability to inspire others, and a willingness to take risks are some traits that excellent leadership qualities that presidents frequently exhibit.

Provides direction and propels the team forward. A leader gives the team direction by outlining goals and objectives in detail so that everyone on the team is aware of the ultimate target they are working toward. enables team members to perform at their highest level. A strong leader is able to give his or her team members duties that play to their strengths since they are aware of their abilities and skills. assumes accountability for decisions. To prevent work from being delayed when the team is unable to decide between several options, a leader steps up and makes a decision on behalf of the group. Offer to help with new tasks. When your manager or supervisor requests more assistance, offer to take on more jobs.

To know more about leadership visit:

brainly.com/question/28487636

#SPJ4

Answer:

i looked it up for you and it said that a change and major transition are coming so maybe it could be a good sign so goodluck

Explanation:

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

In St. Louis, Missouri, in August 2000, Richard Miller orally agreed to loan Jeff Miller $35,000 in exchange for a security interest in a 1999 Kodiak dump truck. The Millers did not put anything in writing concerning the loan, its repayment terms, or Richard's security interest or rights in the truck. Jeff used the amount of the loan to buy the truck, which he kept in his possession. In June 2004, Jeff filed a petition to obtain a discharge of his debts in bankruptcy. Richard claimed that he had a security interest in the truck and thus was entitled to any proceeds from its sale. What are a creditor's main concerns on a debtor's default? How does a creditor satisfy these concerns? What are the requirements for a creditor to have an enforceable security interest? Have these requirements been met in this case? Considering these points, what is the court likely to rule with respect to Richard's claim?

Answer and Explanation:

In such a case, the main concern of the creditor is the payment of the debt, which must be obtained through assets or guarantees, where, in fact, the creditor has priority over other possible creditors. For the creditor to have this right, he must place a security interest on top of the security already established. To do this, the lender will need to meet certain requirements such as having a guarantee or contract maintained in physical and written media, providing something of value or debtor and maintaining the debtor's rights in that guarantee.

In the case shown above, the creditor has not established a written guarantee or contract, as both the debtor and the creditor have issued a verbal contract, so we can guarantee that there was no agreement promoting the guarantee between them. In this case, Richard has no payment priority and will be paid just like the other creditors, when possible.

Answer:

There isn't stages to Majority leaders but  Mitch McConnell ig.

Explanation:

Yes, generally it is possible to limit the exercise of any entitlement by the owner of a thing contractually.

The owner of an item frequently has the option of agreeing to a contract with another party that restricts the execution of that party's entitlements or rights. A software creator may engage into a licence agreement with a user that restricts user's capacity to change or redistribute software, or a homeowner may enter into a contract with a renter that restricts tenant's use of property.

The amount to which the exercise of a right or entitlement can be constrained by contract, however, may be subject to legal restrictions. For instance, legislation protecting certain rights that cannot be waived or negotiated away may exist in some jurisdictions. Furthermore, any contractual restrictions on rights or entitlements must be properly drafted to ensure they are enforceable in court and do not violate any laws.

Read more about entitlement on:

https://brainly.com/question/24224291

#SPJ4

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it should be C not that sure

Answer:

the ans is six divisions

Answer:

1. False

4. True

5. True

Explanation:

This is all I know :)

Answer:
I was personally taught 11 exceptions to obtaining a search warrant. I've chosen the four that I think are the most common.

(1) Consent – A warrant is not needed if the person gives the officer their permission to search their things without one. If an officer asks "may I search your car" and the driver says "yes", a warrant isn't needed.

(2) Plain View – If the objects are in "plain view", a warrant isn't required to conduct a search. An officer doesn't need a warrant to observe that which can clearly be seen in a place where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

(3) Evanescent Evidence – If the officer has reason to believe that a person will destroy the evidence in the time it will take to get a warrant, places may be searched without one.

(4) Hot Pursuit – Any attempt a person makes to physically escape before the officer is done with them is grounds for arrest without a warrant, and anything the officer comes across, sees, or walks by in their pursuit of them, is automatically searchable without a warrant.

Some models only contain the first 5 levels of the continuum and divide these skills into empty hand, soft control, and intermediate weapon approaches.

An important subject in law enforcement is the force continuum. The force continuum, as its name implies, is used to determine the right amount of force to utilize in a certain situation. While some circumstances only call for the use of limited force, others necessitate the use of lethal force. Therefore, the force continuum determines the precise level of force to be delivered.

You will be given situational, dynamic questions during the oral board test regarding how you would respond in a particular situation. You'll be required to respond in a responsible, proportionate, and measured way.

Police personnel use the force continuum, a spectrum of force that ranges from Level 1 to Level 5, to decide how to respond to a scenario. Its purpose is to plan a systematic and convincing answer to an offered, frequently complex response. For instance, it would not be acceptable for a police officer to shoot and kill a bystander for disobeying obvious commands. Always respond in a manner commensurate with how serious the offense was.

To learn more about force continuum from given link

https://brainly.com/question/26276607

#SPJ4

Answer:

Powers and Functions of the Council of Ministers:

(i) Formulation of Policies:

(ii) Administration and Maintenance of Public Order:

(iii) Appointments:

(iv) Guiding the Legislature:

(v) Control over the State Exchequer:

(vi) Execution of Central Laws and Decisions of the Union Government:

Explanation:

Answer:

C. to keep the house from catching on fire

Explanation:

Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.

When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.

An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.

In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.

So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire