The statement "In Canada, the two primary law-making bodies are the legislatures and the courts" is true.
Canada is a democratic country and has a parliamentary system of governance. In Canada, the law-making process is a bicameral legislature system, meaning that laws are made by both federal and provincial governments, the courts, and the Parliament of Canada. The Parliament of Canada is a legislative branch that makes laws and governs Canada. It has two chambers: the Senate and the House of Commons. The primary function of the Senate is to provide checks and balances on the government, while the House of Commons is responsible for representing the people and passing laws. The courts of Canada are also responsible for making laws. The Supreme Court of Canada, for example, is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that the laws are consistent with it.
To know more about legislatures visit:
brainly.com/question/32861646
#SPJ11
what program is organized and operated by citizens whose missions involve canvasing the neighborhood to reduce certain types of crimes?
Neighborhood Watch program is organized and operated by citizens whose missions involve canvassing the neighborhood to reduce certain types of crimes.
The Neighborhood Watch program is a community-based crime prevention initiative aimed at promoting safety and security within neighborhoods.
It involves residents voluntarily organizing and collaborating with local law enforcement agencies to create a network of vigilant individuals who look out for suspicious activities and report them to the authorities.
The program encourages neighbors to be proactive in preventing crime by fostering a sense of community and fostering communication between residents and law enforcement.
Neighborhood Watch programs typically involve regular meetings, training sessions, and the dissemination of crime prevention information to empower residents to actively participate in keeping their neighborhoods safe.
Learn more about Neighborhood Watch program here:
https://brainly.com/question/31671387
#SPJ4
___________ promotes the recognition of ideologies. A. Social controlc. Ethnocentrismb. Social movementd. War.
The acceptance of ideologies is encouraged through social movements.
What exactly are social movements?
Networks of unofficial relationships involving a variety of people, groups, and/or organizations involved in political or cultural issues are referred to as social movements. These interactions are based on a commonality of collective identities. The American civil rights movement, second-wave feminism, the LGBT rights movement, environmental activism and conservation initiatives, opposition to mass surveillance, etc. are illustrative instances. They frequently focus on subjects that are outside of the classroom but nonetheless pertinent. Reform movements, revolutionary movements, reactionary movements, self-help organizations, and religious movements are the primary categories of social movements. Social movements frequently need to draw sizable populations in order to be successful.
To learn more about social movements refer to
https://brainly.com/question/20416654
#SPJ4
which part of the constitution ensures that judges don’t worry about what might happen if they deliver a fair but unpopular ruling?
In accordance with Article III of the Constitution, judges "shall keep their offices during good behavior." Although a little ambiguous, the meaning is obvious.
The seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament is the Book of Judges. The time between the conquest recorded in the Book of Joshua and the founding of a kingdom depicted in the Books of Samuel is covered in the Hebrew Bible's narrative. During this period, biblical judges acted as temporary rulers. The narratives all have similar structure: the people turn away from Yahweh and are thus given over to their enemies; they repent and beg Yahweh for mercy, and he responds by sending a leader or champion; the judge frees the Israelites from oppression and they prosper; soon after, they turn away from Yahweh once more, and the cycle is repeated. Many of the tales are taken into consideration by academics.
Learn more about judges from
brainly.com/question/29885435
#SPJ4
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
How will law enforcement officers interact with the community they serve in the year 2030?
hope they leave us alone
What was the situation in Rome during the times Sallust is describing?
Answer:
The political, and moral decline of Rome
Explanation:
which of the following is least likely to be a role the president plays in domestic politics? A. Chief Legislator B. Chief of Party C. Chief Diplomat D. Chief Executive
Answer:
Explanation:
c
The least likely role that the President plays in domestic politics is C. Chief Diplomat.
The Chief Diplomat role refers to the President's role in conducting foreign policy and representing the country abroad. While the President may engage in diplomacy and negotiations with other countries that have domestic implications, this role is primarily focused on foreign affairs. In contrast, the other roles mentioned, Chief Legislator, Chief of Party, and Chief Executive, all have a direct impact on domestic politics. The President's role as Chief Legislator involves working with Congress to shape domestic policy. As Chief of Party, the President leads their political party and helps to shape its agenda. As Chief Executive, the President is responsible for enforcing laws and overseeing the administration of the government.
To learn more about politics visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ11
Why is evidence of a habit considered admissible in many cases? Because it shows that a person has a pattern of truthfulness or untruthfulness. Because it shows that someone is not likely to be the type of person to engage in a specific activity. Because it shows that someone is likely to have been in a specific place at a certain time. Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Answer:
Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Explanation:
Evidence of a habit is considered admissible in many cases in court because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
This is because, the habit of a person is used to prove that the conduct of such person during a given occasion is consistent with his/her habits.
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
A benefit that is sought buy an interest group that once achieved cannot be denied to nonmembers is called aA free riderB solidary benefitC collective goodD purposive benefit
A benefit sought by an interest group that, once attained, cannot be denied to nonmembers is referred to as a collective good.
A collective good represents a valuable outcome that an interest group aims to achieve, such as policy changes, public goods, or societal improvements. Unlike private goods that can be selectively distributed or denied based on membership or contribution, collective goods are non-excludable.
Once the group successfully obtains the desired benefit, it becomes accessible to everyone, including nonmembers and free riders. This poses a dilemma for interest groups, as individuals may be tempted to reap the benefits without investing their resources or efforts.
For more information on collective good visit: brainly.com/question/15604402
#SPJ11
why does vicarious punishment seem to produce less of an effect than vicarious reinforcement? group of answer choices
Vicarious punishment and vicarious reinforcement are two different concepts that can have different effects on behavior. Vicarious punishment involves punishing one person for the actions of another, while vicarious reinforcement involves rewarding one person for the actions of another.
Vicarious punishment is typically used as a deterrent to discourage certain behaviors, while vicarious reinforcement is used to encourage certain behaviors. In general, vicarious punishment is less effective than vicarious reinforcement because it can lead to resentment, anger, and a lack of motivation to change behavior.
Learn more about Vicarious punishment
https://brainly.com/question/29095915
#SPJ4
Full Question ;
why does vicarious punishment usually produce less effect than vicarious reinforcement?
If the suspects have been further charged with a criminal offence in Court, briefly explain what will happen during the prosecution stage in the criminal proceeding.
Answer & Explanation:
During the prosecution stage in the criminal proceeding, the prosecutor will present evidence to the court in order to prove that the accused committed the charged criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutor may call witnesses, present physical evidence, and provide any other relevant evidence to the court. The accused has the right to cross-examine the prosecutor's witnesses and present their own evidence and arguments in their defense. After both sides have presented their case, the judge or jury will determine if the prosecution has proven the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the accused is found guilty, the judge will sentence them to a punishment that is appropriate for the severity of the offense.
what is commercial transaction
On a reality television show, the host tells the audience that, according to DNA tests, there is a 98.9 percent likelihood that Henry is the father of Jorge. What forensic idea does this BEST demonstrate? A. probability B. testimony C. identification D. comparison
Answer:
probability
Explanation:
Probability is the branch of mathematics concerning numerical descriptions of how likely an event is to occur, or how likely it is that a proposition is true. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where, roughly speaking, 0 indicates impossibility of the event and 1 indicates certainty.
This is an illustration of probability. As a result, Option (A) is the best decision.
What is probability?Mathematical representations of the likelihood that an event will happen or that a proposition is true are dealt with in the discipline of mathematics known as probability. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where 1 denotes certainty and 0 denotes the impossibility of the event. An event is more likely to occur the more likely it is that it will.
Tossing a fair (unbiased) coin is a straightforward demonstration. The coin is fair, therefore both "heads" and "tails" are equally likely to occur; as a result, the chance of each outcome is equal. Additionally, the chance of either occurring is 1/2 (sometimes written as 0.5 or 50%), as there are no other
Hence, Option (A) is accurate.
Learn more about probability, from:
brainly.com/question/9793303
#SPJ5
The police are investigating a crime that occurred at Shoprite. They find a red umbrella in the store where a man was assaulted by an unknown person. Three blocks away from Shoprite, investigators find a wallet with the same fingerprints on them as the umbrella. The place where the umbrella was found is called the...
A) Primary Crime Scene
B) Secondary Crime scene
C) Tertiary Crime scene
D) Accomplice
primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped
if a depreciable asset is sold at a gain and the tax basis of the asset is greater than the book basis, the tax gain on sale will be than the book gain on sale.
If a depreciable asset is sold at a gain and the tax basis of the asset is greater than the book basis, the tax gain on sale will be higher than the book gain on sale.
This is because the tax basis is used to calculate the taxable gain, while the book basis is used to calculate the gain or loss on the sale in the company's financial statements.
When the tax basis is higher than the book basis, it means that the company has claimed more depreciation on the asset for tax purposes than it has recorded in its financial statements. This results in a higher tax gain on the sale compared to the book gain on sale.
To know more about tax gain,refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/21438354#
#SPJ11
What is a presentence report?
A state law provides that a person who has been divorced may not marry again unless he or she is current on all child-support payments. A woman who was refused a marriage license pursuant to this law sued the appropriate state officials. What standard should the court apply in reviewing the constitutionality of this law
Prescription medicines can impair a driver's judgement and slow reaction times.
Oa) true
Ob) false
What is the Purpose, Intent and Principles in Privacy policy?
Answer:
The aim of a privacy policy is to protect individuals and organizations from data protection and privacy violations.
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
I keep trying to sign up,but it keeps saying "I'm sorry but we cant sign you up right now" i think they wrote that? I don't know but they wrote something like that
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
47. part a some attorneys are litigators, so some attorneys are skillful litigators, since some attorneys are skillful. which of the following correctly expresses the form of this argument? a. some a are s. b. some a are sl. c. some a are s. some a are l. some a are l. some a are sl. some a are sl. some a are s. some a are l. c. some a are not s. d. some a are l. some a are not l. some a are not s. some a are not sl. some a are sl. part a answer: part b which of the following substitutions proves the argument invalid? this means that the choice below is false. use your answer from part a. a. a
Some A are S; some A are L; so some A are SL correctly expresses the form of the above argument.
The above question is a a situation of syllogism. A syllogism is a type of logical argument that relies on deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion from two assertions or presumptions. A syllogism first appears when a conclusion—the major idea the argument is trying to convey—is validly implied by two genuine premises (propositions or statements). A conclusion is deduced from two or three provided propositions or statements using a syllogism. Aristotelian and Stoic syllogism were two opposing syllogistic philosophies that were prevalent in antiquity. [3] Syllogism and categorical syllogism have been used synonymously since the Middle Ages. Since syllogism is a technique for legitimate logical reasoning, it will always be helpful in the majority of situations and for general-audience introductions to logic and clear thinking.
To know more about syllogism:
https://brainly.com/question/21635821
#SPJ4
Sometimes, economic goals conflict with one another. Therefore, all nations must their economic goals. And each choice comes with some kind of _____.
Answer:
loss
Explanation:
The economic goals are the objectives of any nation which it desires to achieve. The economic goals of any nations includes full employment, efficiency, security, equity, stability, economic freedom and economic growth.
The economic goal are sometimes incompatible with each other. The cost of fulfilling the one set goals is having less resources to address the other sets of goals.
The economic goals conflict with one another. Every goal cannot be achieve at the same time. The choice of one goal comes with the loss of another goal.
required the united states, canada, and mexico to remove all tariffs and trade barriers over 15 years, and beginning in 2008, all tariff barriers were officially dropped.
NAFTA required the United States, Canada, and Mexico to remove all tariffs and trade barriers over 15 years, and beginning in 2008, all tariff barriers were officially dropped.
What is NAFTA?
The most significant aspect of the bilateral commercial relationship between the United States and Mexico is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was passed in 1994 and established a free trade zone for Mexico, Canada, and the United States. NAFTA aims to remove all tariff and non-tariff trade and investment barriers between the US, Canada, and Mexico.
Until the USMCA went into effect, NAFTA was still in effect. Canada and Mexico informed the United States that they were prepared to put the deal into effect in April 2020. NAFTA was replaced on July 1st, 2020, by the USMCA.
To know more about NAFTA, click here- brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ4
name the positions of the presiding officers of the house of representatives and the senate explain which one has more power
PLSSS I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO SOMEONE WHO ANSWERS
Answer:
Both the Senate and the House of Representatives are part of the United States Congress, that is, they are part of the federal legislative body of the nation. While the Senate represents the states equally, the House has a proportional representation to the populations of each American state.
Both congressional chambers have a leader, who represents the chamber at a general level, and belongs to the political party that has a majority in it: in the Senate, the Vice President (currently, Kamala Harris) is in turn president of the Senate, but as generally does not have participation, it is the President Pro Tempore who exercises the leadership of the chamber. For its part, in the House of Representatives, its leader is the Speaker, who also belongs to the majority.
In turn, the Speaker of the House is second in the line of presidential succession, after the Vice President, while the President Pro Tempore of the Senate occupies third place.
Some travellers were travelling on a
foreign vessel, one foreigner 'A'
attacked and stabbed another
foreigner 'B' on the vessel on High
Seas. 'B' got seriously injured in the
attack and was brought to hospital
in Kerala for treatment where he
died because of the injuries caused
to him by 'A'. 'A' was also brought to
Kerala and he was available there in
Kerala at the time of the death of
'B'. As per the given situation where
can 'A' be tried? Would Indian
Courts have Jurisdiction in this
matter? Discuss.
1:23 PM
Answer:
I think A stabbed in the stomach of B with knife
Explanation:
I think B should get Justice by prisoning the A for whole his life by police department
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
what dispute led to the new york times co. v. united states case in the supreme court? how was the case decided?
Explanation:
The New York Times Co. v. United States case, commonly known as the "Pentagon Papers case," was a legal dispute that arose in 1971 between the United States government and several major newspapers, including The New York Times, over the publication of classified documents related to the Vietnam War.
In 1967, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara commissioned a top-secret study on the U.S. government's decision-making process during the Vietnam War. The study, which became known as the "Pentagon Papers," consisted of a 7,000-page report that detailed the U.S. government's involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a former government employee who had worked on the study, leaked portions of it to The New York Times and other newspapers.
The government argued that the publication of the classified documents would harm national security and requested that The New York Times and other newspapers cease publication of the materials. The newspapers argued that the First Amendment protected their right to publish the materials in the public interest.
The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the newspapers in a 6-3 decision. The Court held that the government had not met the heavy burden of proving that the publication of the materials would result in "direct, immediate, and irreparable" harm to national security. The Court further noted that the government's argument for prior restraint on the publication of the materials was unconstitutional, as it would amount to an impermissible abridgment of the freedom of the press.
The decision in the New York Times Co. v. United States case was a landmark victory for press freedom and the First Amendment, affirming the important role that the press plays in holding the government accountable to the public. The case set a precedent for future cases involving the publication of classified materials and established a high bar for the government to meet in order to justify prior restraint on the press.
Who sets bail for criminal offenses
Answer:
The judge has the power to determine the quantity of bail based upon factors on the severity of an alleged criminal offense, the possibility of the defendant will escape the jurisdiction prior to trial, and the likelihood of the defendant will commit more crimes following their release.