Under federal law, employers are required to maintain their employees' medical records for at least 30 years after the employee's employment ends.
However, state laws may require employers to keep medical records for a longer period of time. It is important for employers to comply with both federal and state laws regarding the maintenance and confidentiality of medical records. Failure to do so can result in legal consequences and penalties.
Additionally, employers must ensure that their employees' medical records are securely stored and protected from unauthorized access. Overall, maintaining employees' medical records is a crucial responsibility for employers to ensure the health and safety of their workforce.
For more such questions on federal law , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/25912245
#SPJ11
Which of the following explains why the Federal Aviation Administration and the United States Maritime Administration work closely with the U.S. Customs Agency?
Responses
to create specific regulations for weight loads on air and sea transports
to design entry and exit points out of the country to control air and sea flow
to prevent oil spills and other environmental disasters
to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To know more about Crime Prevention:
brainly.com/question/14495855
#SPJ1
Answer: The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
Explanation: This answer has been confirmed correct.
In your research, answer these questions:
What was the main argument of each side in Muller v. Oregon?
How did non-legal data figure into this case, and why is it important?
How did Muller v. Oregon impact future cases?
Answer:
The seven gifts of the Holy Spirit are wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord. While some Christans accept these as a definitive list of specific attributes, others understand them merely as examples of the Holy Spirit's work through the faithful.
Explanation:
thanks
the government is considering placing additional taxes on foreign steel imports that are a proportion of the value of the imported steel. this is an example of
A. an ad valorem tariff
B. a subsidy tax
C. a specific tariff
D. an import quota
According to the given statement this is an example of an ad valorem tariff.
The correct option is A.
What is in a government?The U.S. Constitution grants Congress, the Head of state, and the Higher courts, respectively, the authority to act as the deliberative, executive, and judicial departments of the federal government. In order to create courts and jails, equip an army and police force, and elect or select the persons responsible for enacting and enforcing the laws that people are not allowed to transgress, taxes are needed to support the image of government as protector.
What rights does the government have?Furthermore, in law, individual rights and state rights are frequently defined in somewhat different ways. However, governments, other organisations, and people are frequently referred to as having rights in American legal terminology.
To know more about Government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10785628
#SPJ4
Explain the difference between state laws and guidelines.
6. A speed limit is best described as:
A - Substantive law
B - Procedural law
C - Local rules of a court
D - None of the above
7. State’s rights are outlined in the:
A - The 4 th Amendment to the U. B - The Federal Register
C - The 10 th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
D - The common Law
6. A speed limit is best described as Substantive law. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
7. State’s rights are outlined in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The laws that specify how members of a society are expected to behave are known as substantive law. In contrast, procedural law—a collection of rules for creating, implementing, and upholding substantive law—is used to define and contrast this concept.
The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to clarify the relationship between the federal and state governments. According to the amendment, the federal government only has the authority that the Constitution expressly grants it.
Therefore, the appropriate options are A and C respectively.
To learn more on substantive law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8324784
#SPJ4
why would a scientist fabricate, falsify, or plagiarize?
It is often believed that scientists are more inclined to fabricate or falsify information when they are under publication pressure, when they are not subject to societal restraints, when they operate in nations without laws prohibiting scientific misconduct, and when they are male.
Results in many scientific domains are frequently challenging to replicate accurately because they are masked by noise, artifacts, and other auxiliary data. Therefore, even if a scientist does manipulate data, they can hope to get away with it—or at the very least, claim innocence—if their findings disagree with those of other scientists working in the same field.
Fabrication: The recording or reporting of false information. Possible fabrication illustration: A research coordinator filled out trial enrollment forms with fictitious names and participant information in order to match the demands and expectations for recruitment.
Scientists who fabricate data are aware that they are breaking the law and do not want to be discovered. So, one way to get around this might be to make some parts of the article difficult to read. We recommend language can be one of many variables to differentiate between fraudulent and genuine science.”
To know more about falsify information, click the below link
https://brainly.com/question/28527507
#SPJ4
Disclosing workplace issues in a public setting is _
For purposes of determining subject matter jurisdiction, a corporation is a resident of.
For purposes of determining subject matter jurisdiction, a corporation is a resident of. For diversity purposes, a corporation is considered a resident of its state of incorporation and the state in which it has its principal place of business.
Is subject matter a type of jurisdiction?In order for a court to hear a particular type of claim that is brought before it, it must have subject-matter jurisdiction.
When a court has subject-matter jurisdiction, it has the power to hear and decide on cases belonging to the same general category as the current proceedings. One such instance is the ability of a bankruptcy court to only hear bankruptcy cases.
Fiscal value, a court's geographic jurisdiction, and the court's subject matter are the main factors in determining jurisdiction.
To learn more about jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?
Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white collar crime.
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
What are the Warning Traffic Signs?
A warning sign is a particular kind of sign that alerts the viewer to a potential risk, impediment, or circumstance that calls for extra care.
A driver may not immediately notice some of the hazards that are indicated by traffic signs on the sides of the road. At the Turin Automobile Museum, there are primarily warning signs on display (along with some control signs like Do Not Enter). Shape and colours of the utilised road warning sign are: Uses Uses Uses Uses Uses, previously used has utilised in the past, utilises several, absent any data. The shapes of warning traffic signs can vary, but they typically have an equilateral triangle shape with a white background and a heavy red border. They have a yellow backdrop and a black border in the People's Republic of China (Macau and Hong Kong are the exceptions).
Learn more about Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/9368597
#SPJ4
Two police cars are chasing a suspected
bank robber. If one police car cuts through
the park, it can get in front of the suspect's
car and trap it between the patrol cars. Determine if this is allowed or no allowed based on “Vehicles prohibited in parks” law, explain why.
Answer:
Explanation:
Because i we drive our car in the park it will hit someone
Which of the following is most true?
a. Illegal harassment and discrimination can apply to any protected category.
b. Illegal harassment and discrimination only applies to sex and gender.
c. Any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal.
d. Company policies cannot be more restrictive than the law requires.
The most accurate statement is that any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal. (option c)This answer is consistent with U.S. federal and state laws, as well as international conventions, which generally prohibit discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, age, disability, religion, national origin, and other protected categories.
In addition, harassment and discrimination can take many forms, such as unwelcome conduct that creates a hostile or offensive work environment, unfair treatment in employment decisions, and retaliation against employees who complain about discrimination or harassment. Therefore, it is important for employers to have policies and training programs that promote diversity, inclusion, and respect in the workplace.
Company policies can be more restrictive than the law requires, as long as they do not discriminate or retaliate against employees who engage in protected activities. However, it is recommended to ensure that company policies align with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies are responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and employees who believe they have been harassed or discriminated against can file a complaint with these agencies or pursue legal action.
To know more about harassment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32417535
#SPJ11
Why do the police feel that Michelle committed $uicide?
Answer:
It depends on what killed her, but I need more evidence
Explanation:
What possible legal defense(s) could they use for criminal charges related to the burglary?
Answer:
What possible legal defense(s) could they use for criminal charges related to the burglary?
Explanation:
A Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI) is designed to do which of the following?
Answer:
may be you forgot to give options no PROBLEM I have written according to me
Explanation:
The ground-fault circuit interrupter, or GFCI, is a fast-acting circuit breaker designed to shut off electric power in the event of a ground-fault within as little as 1/40 of a second. It works by comparing the amount of current going to and returning from equipment along the circuit conductors.
Which of the following is not typically associated with PD diagnoses?
Hospitalizations
Homosexuality
Criminal behavior
Dysfunction at work and in relationships
The item that is not typically associated with PD diagnoses includes:
HomosexualityCriminal behaviorDysfunction at work and in relationshipsWhat is a PD diagnoses?The PD diagnoses means the diagonize of the Parkinson's disease. In an overview, the parkinson's disease basically a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves.
The symptoms of this disease usually start slowly, the common first symptom is a barely noticeable tremor in just one hand and tremors but the disorder may also cause stiffness or slowing of movement.
Read more about Parkinson disease
brainly.com/question/5126740
#SPJ1
Question #4
Multiple Choice
Key computer issues addressed by the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) include all of the following except
how to increase the amount of "cookies"
how to avoid "malware"
how to protect kids online
O how to prevent "scammers," "hackers," and identity theft
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) addresses key computer issues such as avoiding malware, protecting kids online, and preventing scammers, hackers, and identity theft. However, it does not specifically focus on increasing the amount of "cookies."
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) is an agency that works to protect consumers from various issues related to computer and online activities. It provides resources and information to help individuals navigate the digital landscape safely. Some of the key computer issues addressed by the BCP include educating consumers on how to avoid malware, which refers to malicious software that can harm computers and compromise data security. The BCP also emphasizes the importance of protecting children online, promoting awareness about the potential risks and offering guidance to parents and caregivers.
Additionally, the BCP plays a crucial role in raising awareness about scams, hackers, and identity theft, aiming to help consumers prevent and respond to these threats effectively. However, increasing the amount of "cookies," which are small text files stored on a computer to track website activity, is not a specific issue addressed by the BCP. While the BCP may provide general information about online privacy and data collection, its primary focus is on protecting consumers from potential harm and fraudulent activities rather than addressing technical aspects like increasing the number of "cookies."
Learn more about Bureau of Consumer Protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/15216453
#SPJ11
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract. In favor or against it. Discuss (20 marks)
Note:please the answer should be at least 800 words.
Please add references below the answer(use APA format including author's last name and year of publication, for direct quotations include the page number as well and all websites used to retrieve materials must be referenced)
Answer:
This statement is incorrect, since the theory has enormous relevance in law.
Explanation:
The law is basically a set of norms that regulates life in society, establishing guidelines for coexistence and rules of conduct that, if not complied with, have consequences that can range from simple fines to time in prison.
But unlike what the statement says, the law is composed of a theoretical component, which implies the sociological and cultural study of the law and the society to which it will apply, the consequences that it may have and its use in other societies. Without this study, the laws would be empty of content, since they would be simple rules without any basis and, therefore, very easy to be broken.
1. John offers Tk. 5,000 to anyone who will remove
rubbish and clean his garden. The following people comply with the terms of
this offer:
(a) His wife, Gen;
(b) His ex-wife, Flora;
(c) His colleague, Sam
(d) His son, 9 years old, William;
(e) His next-door neighbor, Billy-a lunatic.
Advise John whether or not, in these circumstances, any legally
enforceable contracts have been concluded.
Answer:
In these circumstances, it is unlikely that legally enforceable contracts have been concluded with everyone who has complied with John's offer.
(a) John's wife Gen is considered a household member, and thus cannot enter into a contract with her husband.
(b) John's ex-wife Flora, however, can enter into a contract with John.
(c) John's colleague Sam can also enter into a contract with John as they have a professional relationship.
(d) John's son William is a minor, and as per the contract law, a minor cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
(e) John's next-door neighbor Billy is a lunatic, and as per the contract law, a person of unsound mind cannot enter into a legally binding contract.
In conclusion, only John's ex-wife Flora and his colleague Sam have entered into legally enforceable contracts with John for the removal of rubbish and cleaning of his garden.
How would limiting awards affect medical malpractice lawsuits?
Answer: Supporters say caps on medical malpractice awards discourage frivolous lawsuits and reduce the cost of health care because providers no longer need to practice defensive medicine. Yet research shows that costs from medical liability make up just 2 to 2.5 percent of total health care spending
Explanation:
What if somebody accidentally gives me the wrong answer? Wouldn’t I NOT be learning? And wouldn’t it be a waste of my points?
Answer:
yup that happenes sometime..
Explanation:
Explain the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923
The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 requires employers to provide benefits to employees who are injured or killed on the job.
The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 was enacted to compensate workers who were injured in the course of their employment due to an accident. It applies to all employees, including those who work part-time, temporarily, or casually.
This act assures that laborers' rights are protected even if they suffer disability or death as a result of an accident at work. The Act also includes provisions for medical and other benefits, such as reimbursement of medical expenses, provision of artificial limbs, and payment of a gratuity.
Therefore, the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923 is mentioned above.
To learn more on Employees Compensation Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30269394
#SPJ1
Which model believes that societies can agree to what behavior is acceptable
and unacceptable?
Identify one law in the Philippines which you think needs to be revised as it is no longer relevant to the present times . Enumerate reasons why it need to be revised and the revisions needed to be done on the particular law.
Answer it Properly and Clear
One law in the Philippines which needs to be revised as it is no longer relevant to the present times is the Revised Penal Code's (RPC) Article 100.
This law is no longer relevant because of the current developments and advancements in technology .Article 100 of the RPC talks about. Subsidiary imprisonment is a penalty imposed when the convict is not able to pay the fine imposed on them. The penalty requires the convict to serve their sentence through simple imprisonment in case they are not able to pay the fine that was imposed upon them.
This punishment is not necessary in the current times due to the technological advancements, which means that there are more options for convicts to be penalized with the same effect. Article 100 of the RPC needs to be revised due to the following reasons: Incarceration costs are high. The economy is now significantly different from how it was when the law was made. The goal of punishment has evolved over time, and the primary focus now is on the rehabilitation of the offender.
The current approach is to find ways to rehabilitate the offender so that they can be reintegrated into society. The goal is not to punish them through incarceration. Revisions needed to be done on the particular law To revise Article 100 of the RPC, the following can be done: Revise the penal system: The current penal system should be re-examined to find ways to rehabilitate offenders rather than to punish them.
This way, the number of people being incarcerated will be reduced, and the system will be more effective in rehabilitating offenders. Implement community service: Instead of sending offenders to jail, they could be required to serve their sentence by doing community service. This way, they can contribute positively to society and also pay back for their crimes. Create alternative penalties: The government could create alternative penalties that would allow offenders to serve their sentence without being incarcerated. For example, electronic tagging could be used to monitor offenders who have been released from jail.
To know more about Subsidiary imprisonment
brainly.com/question/18652891
#SPJ11
Your uncle Brian stole three t-shirts from a stand at the mall. You are upset that he made this choice, and decide to use your iPhone to secretly record a conversation with him where he admits that he did, in fact, steal the shirts. He is awaiting trial, and you bring the recording to the police station to submit it as evidence. In your state, it is illegal to use a secretly recorded conversation in a court of law. In other words, this piece of evidence is inadmissible. Do you agree with this rule? In your answer, define the exclusionary rule and doctrine of fruit of the poisonous tree, and explain how these terms apply to your situation.
Answer: I agree with this rule that secretly recorded conversations cannot be used as evidence in a court of law. I agree with this rule because with technology now days it would be all too easy to takes someones words out of contact or even rearrange what was said. This also violates our rights as Americans and takes away our privacy. The fruit of the poisonous tree rule is an extension of the exclusionary rule meaning, illegally gathered evidence cannot be admissible in a court of law, the fruit being the evidence and the poisonous tree being the means in which the evidence was gathered.
Explanation:
Which of the following cannot be discharged by filing bankruptcy?
a. Credit card debt.
b. Mortgaged debt.
c. Student loan.
The option is c. Student loan.Bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual or business declares that they cannot repay their debts, and their assets are liquidated, or a payment plan is agreed upon to pay their debts. Bankruptcy can eliminate some debts and prevent creditors from collecting them, but it cannot discharge all debts.
While bankruptcy can discharge or eliminate some debts, student loans cannot be discharged by filing for bankruptcy. This is because student loans are considered "nondischargeable" under bankruptcy law. This means that regardless of the type of bankruptcy filed, student loan debt will not be discharged unless the debtor can prove "undue hardship."Credit card debt can be discharged by filing bankruptcy, but it is important to note that the ability to discharge credit card debt will depend on the specific circumstances of the case. Mortgaged debt can also be discharged by filing bankruptcy, but the debtor will lose their property as part of the bankruptcy process if they cannot catch up with their payments.
To know more about Bankruptcy visit-
brainly.com/question/30628707
#SPJ11
The doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim is called
Answer:
Res judicata
Explanation:
Res judicata is a Latin word which means matter decided. It is a situation in which an apex court has ruled over a case and there is no more room for any appeal or retrial of any form.
The judgement is usually final with both parties having no option than to accept it.
Res judicata is also known as the doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim.
unlike the civil rights act, the americans with disabilities act (ada) considers
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) considers disability as an essential component, unlike the Civil Rights Act.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990, and was intended to eliminate discrimination against people with disabilities in many areas of daily life.
The act is the most comprehensive legislation to date to protect the civil rights of individuals with disabilities. It's designed to give a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against persons with disabilities and to help them integrate into mainstream American life. Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) applies to employment and establishes specific guidelines for disabled workers.
The act prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in employment, public services, transportation, public accommodations, and telecommunications. Title I of the act focuses on employment and prohibits discrimination against qualified people with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, advancement, termination, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.
Therefore, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) considers disability as an essential component, unlike the Civil Rights Act.
Read more about ADA at https://brainly.com/question/30392203
#SPJ11
Given that almost half of all property crimes are committed by juveniles who have previous arrests and convictions, it is likely that the juvenile justice system _____.is successful at the goal of rehabilitating juvenile offendersis successful at the goal of rehabilitating juvenile offendersis an overall successis an overall successis successful at keeping the community safeis successful at keeping the community safeis not a successful modelis not a successful model
Given that almost half of all property crimes are committed by juveniles who have previous arrests and convictions, it is likely that the juvenile justice system is not a successful model.
How successful has the juvenile justice system been ?The success of the juvenile justice system is a highly debated topic and can be evaluated from various perspectives.
The high rate of recidivism among juveniles with previous arrests and convictions suggests that the system has not been successful in addressing the root causes of juvenile crime. In order to improve the success of the juvenile justice system, ongoing evaluation and refinement of policies and practices are needed.
Find out more on the juvenile justice system at https://brainly.com/question/11399114
#SPJ1
With reference to relevant authority, indicate whether a partnership is recognized as a separate entity apart from the partners in terms of SA African law
The common law is the primary source of partnership regulations in South Africa because a partnership is not universally recognized as a separate legal entity apart from the partners.
What is a partnership?A partnership is a business structure whereby two or more partners combine their human and material resources to form an entity.
Partners usually sign a partnership agreement to share risks, profits, and losses. The partnership agreement remains the legal document that establishes a partnership. Where it is not existing, disputes among the partners can be settled using the general partnership agreements.
Examples of common partnerships include:
Law firmsPhysician groups, Real estate investment firmsAccounting groups.Thus, there are no existing partnership laws in South Africa, and partnerships are generally not distinct from their partners, legally speaking.
Learn more about partnership businesses at https://brainly.com/question/14034519